If you have had a direct experience with these beings, that must have been terrifying for you. Although I did an earlier post on this thread to remind people that these reptilians have been known to rape earth women, we should also recall that such experiences are not just a thing of the distant past since, in the early transcripts, Laura mentioned her friend Candy who appeared to have been sexually assaulted by a reptilian being with the marks to prove it.
Prince Marduk, Ra and Yahweh
I deliberately referred to Prince Marduk in my post as he is a central figure in the Mesopotamian legends of the Anunnaki. Indeed, he eventually became the chief god of the city of Babylon and the national god of Babylonia; as such, he was eventually called simply Bel a name derived from the Semitic word Baal, or “lord.” (which in Hebrew became "El"), thus usurping the roles of Anu, Enlil and his own father Enki or Ea as the chief god of Mesopotamia. In Egypt he would be equated with Ra, the sun-god. Marduk’s star was Jupiter, and his sacred animals were horses, dogs, and especially the so-called dragon with forked tongue, representations of which adorn his city’s walls. In Egypt Marduk would be equated with Ra, the Egyptian sun-god. This may be highly significant for us in relation to the Hebrew or Israelite God Yahweh, later rendered as Jehovah or simply as El ("lord") given what the C's said here:
Session 20 August 2001:
Q: If the Levites were the Hittite Moon worshipers, how come Akhenaten, who hung out with Nefertiti, instituted Sun worship? That doesn't make sense.
A: Future Ho into.
Q: Future what into?
A: Ho.
Q: HO must stand for something. I don't understand. Was Nefertiti responsible for Akhenaten's Sun worship?
A: Mostly.
Q: Well why did it turn into Sun worship instead of Moon worship?
A: Future honour of Ra. Go 353535. Deity.
Q: So in other words they were laying a foundation for future layering of other concepts?
A: Yes.
Q: Was the Temple on Crete at Knossos, was it really a necropolis as Wunderlich suggests?
A: 5th density waiting room.
Q: Did they sacrifice humans there?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they sacrifice animals?
A: Yes.
Q: What animals were they sacrificing, and to whom?
A: Apis Bull in part.
Q: What was the other part?
A: Haho 353535
Q: "Ho" must be a name. Is Ho a name of a god?
A: HOH 353535
Q: (T) Is it water? (L) Is it like Hawah? (A) HOH water?
A: Remember Irish pig.
The C's later explained the link between the pig and the 353535 reference in the 20 August 2001 session above:
Session 23 August 2001:
(L) Okay, now about the Pig God: what is it about pigs that makes them ideal as a symbol for the manifestation of God energy, or even as a vehicle?
A: Genetically manipulated RU 353535.
Q: (L) What does that code relate to?
A: Race underpinning tribal code structure.
Q: (L) Are you suggesting that some codon of human DNA that relates to a "tribal code structure" was spliced into an animal?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Why an animal and not a human being? Is it because the STS energy is so contractile that a pig is an appropriate receptacle?
A: Yes.
Finally, we should recall here that the C's told us that the personage of Yahweh was merely a front for the Lizards:
Session 7 October 1994:
Q: (L) Who was Yahweh.
A: Fictional being.
Q: (L) Who was the god that spoke to Moses on the mount?
A: Audible projection of Lizards.
Session 16 September 1995:
Q: (L) What was the origin of the Hebrew People?
A: Genetic construct.
[....]
Q: (L) Who was Yahweh?
A: False teacher.
Q: (RC) Who was Jehovah?
A: Moniker variance of previous answer.
Q: (L) And what was the desired result of the Hebrew genetic manipulation?
A: Further control through the fostering of mistrust and hostility, leading to enslavement and warring. … Also accomplished renewed and invigorated 3rd to 4th density "feeding."
So where the C's say the "Future honour of Ra. Go 353535. Deity", this seems to imply that Yahweh or Jehovah should be equated with Ra, who in turn is equated with the Sumerian or Babylonian Marduk. However, Marduk is merely a human appellation, which the C's also confirmed as being the Sumerian name for the planet Mars. This does not mean to say though that there were not, and still are, individual leaders or princes among the Lizard beings or Anunnaki since the C's have made it clear in the present session that the Lizards and Orions have a hierarchical structure: "They operate under the control of an hierarchical system with an overlord pulling the strings or levers as the case may be".
I also referred in that previous post to the division of the Anunnaki gods into different warring factions, who may have fought a cosmic war for control of the solar system and Earth, which may have involved battles off-Earth on places like Mars, with human groups aligning with one Anunnaki faction or the other. As I said earlier, this may have been remembered by our ancestors as a war of the gods, as described in the Mesopotamian legends of the Anunnaki, in the Greek stories of the war between the Gods of Olympus (linked through Zeus/Jove with the planet Jupiter) and the Titans (linked through their leader Cronus to Saturn), and in the Norse sagas and myths to Ragnarök.
I have recently been re-reading Dr Joseph P Farrell's book The Cosmic War (2007) and would like to quote here what he said about this cosmic battle and the role of the serpents or dragons (the Lizard beings) in ancient history, as described in worldwide myths and legends.
Farrell in interpreting the Mesopotamian stories of the Anunnaki notes that there was a civil war between them involving two sides of a ruling family or dynasty in which Marduk played a prominent part. He likened this conflict to the First World War in Europe, which was fought between countries ruled by monarchs and emperors who all had close family ties with one another, making it almost a "civil war" of sorts between the interrelated royal houses of Europe. He states:
"The same holds true of the Sumerian and Babylonian traditions of the cosmic war, it is in every respect a family war, a civil war and revolt in the pantheon."
The Serpent gods and Dragon People
Farrell then turns his attention to the serpent gods and dragon people, which material I will quote from liberally (see the purple text), whilst adding relevant references from the transcripts to support what is said plus my own quotes in red:
Lucifer is, of course, usually understood by the Judeo-Christian tradition to be the serpent referred to in Genesis three accounts of the fall of man. His description as the “wisest” and “most cunning” of all the creatures – as well as his promise to mankind that if it but eats of the “forbidden fruit” of the tree of knowledge of good and evil – has led some commentators to draw parallels with between him and the “civilising” and “wisdom” gods of other cultures, the gods who taught the arts and sciences of civilisation.
This statement accords with what the C’s have told us about the Lizard beings who represent the true identity of the serpent in Eden:
Session 5 October 1994:
Q: (L) What was the Fruit of the tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil that was supposedly eaten by Eve and then offered to Adam?
A: Knowledge restriction. Encoding.
Q: (L) What did it mean when it said Eve ate of the fruit of the tree of knowledge? What act did she perform to do that?
A: Consorted with wrong side.
Q: (L) What does consorted mean?
A: Eve is symbolic.
Q: (L) Symbolic of what?
A: Female energy.
Q: (L) The female energy did what when it consorted?
A: Lost some knowledge and power.
Q: (L) Why was the eating of the fruit of this tree called knowledge of good and evil feared by god or gods to enable Eve to be equated with gods?
A: What? Clarify please.
Q: (L) Who was the god that feared that the eating of this fruit would make Eve equal to him or them?
A: No. {They were right. I had the trees confused.}
Q: (L) The Bible says that these gods said that they were afraid that man would now take hold of the fruit of the tree of life and live forever. What does this mean? Why did the eating of this fruit make god afraid?
A: Did not.
Q: (L) What was the fruit of the tree of life?
A: Limitation.
Q: (L) How can the fruit of the tree of eternal life be limitation?
A: Conceptually limited.
Q: (L) I want you to know that this does not make a whole lot of sense.
A: Yes it does. Think carefully.
Q: (L) Was the god who walked in the garden who warned Adam and Eve not to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, was that the original creator god? i.e.
the good guy?
A: No.
Q: (L) Who was that god who ordered them not to eat of this tree?
A: Complicated. Laura you are missing the obvious.
Q: (L) In what sense would the fruit of the tree of life be limiting?
A: Believing that one source contains all knowledge is contradicting reality.
[…]
Q: (L) And, how long ago did this occur?
A: 309,882 years ago.
Q: (L) Was the loss of the Edenic state also accompanied by a takeover of mankind by the Lizzies?
A: Yes.
[…]
Q: (L) What was the true identity of the serpent in Eden?
A: Lizards.
Session 7 October 1994:
Q: (L) Regarding the "Fall" in Eden and the loss of the Edenic state, how long ago did that happen?
A: 309,000 years ago approx.
Q: (L) What was the situation... what happened... what was the state of mankind?
A: Loss of faith caused knowledge and physical restrictions by outside forces.
Q: (L) What did the snake or the "tempter" represent?
A: Forces known to you as Lizzies; we have already taught you this.
Q: (L) I am just checking!
[…]
Q: (L) The Sumerian story of the creation of human beings involves a story where they say they killed a god and mixed his blood and parts to mix with mud and then planted it in these female "gestation" goddesses and that this is where the human race came from. Now, this sounds an awful lot like what the "Grays" are doing at the present time. Did someone actually kill a "god", break his soul in pieces, and thereby make the human race?
A: Symbolism and not correct event sequence.
Q: (L) What was that story about? What was the real seed event?
A: Lizard beings genetically altering the human race after battle for their own feeding purposes.
Q: (L) When did these events that these Sumerian stories are talking about take place?
A: 309000 years ago, approx.
Q: (L) So, it happened so long ago that these stories have lost the truth?
A: Reflection passed down through psychic memory channel.
And
Session 28 August 1999:
Q: I have this book, this Marcia Schafer thing: "Confessions of an Intergalactic Anthropologist," and its a bunch of channelled stuff; one thing she says: "the snake is associated with the sign of wisdom and higher learning, and is often regarded quite highly in mystical circles." She had an interaction with a rattlesnake, for which she felt sympathy, and she also has sympathetic interactions with Lizzies. I would like to have a comment on the idea of the snake as a "sign of wisdom and higher learning." Does this, in fact, represent what the snake symbolizes?
A: Snake is/was reported in context of the viewpoint of the observer.
Q: Are you saying that when the observer's viewpoint is that the snake is a symbol of higher learning, maybe...
A: Maybe the observer was just "blown away" by the experience.
Q: Clarify, please.
A: If you were living in the desert, or jungle, about 7,000 years ago, as you measure time, would you not be impressed if these Reptoid "dudes" came down from the heavens in silvery objects and demonstrated techno-wonders from thousands of years in the future, and taught you calculus, geometry and astrophysics to boot?!?
Q: Is that, in fact, what happened?
A: Yup.
Q: Well, this is one of the problems I am dealing with in trying to write this history of mankind. As I understand it, or as I am trying to figure it out from the literature, prior to the 'Fall in Eden,' mankind lived in a 4th density state. Is that correct?
A: Semi/sort of.
Q: Please be more specific.
A: 4th density in another realm, such as time/space continuum, etc.
Q: Okay, so this realm changed, as a part of the cycle; various choices were made: the human race went through the door after the 'gold,' so to speak, and became aligned with the Lizzies after the 'female energy' consorted with the wrong side, so to speak. This is what you have said. This resulted in a number of effects: the breaking up of the DNA, the burning off of the first ten factors of DNA, the separation of the hemispheres of the brain...
A: Only reason for this: you play in the dirt, you're gonna get dirty.
Q: What was the motivating factor for playing in the dirt? What essential thing occurred? You said once that it was 'desire based imbalance.' What was it a desire for?
A: Increased physicality.
Q: What was the objective sought for in this desire for increased physicality?
A: Sensate.
The Mayan-Aztec god Quetzalcoatl who is credited with teaching them their civilisation, is said to have been a bearded white man, but is also, as is well known, depicted as a “feathered serpent” or a “winged serpent”. Similarly, the Incan Viracocha was a bearded white man and also a feathered” or a “winged” serpent. The Egyptian “wisdom god” Thoth, who is also credited with building the Great Pyramid, is also associated with a lizard, the salamander. Even the Book of Revelation refers to Lucifer as a “dragon”, or to put it differently, a “feathered serpent”.
In ancient Egypt’s mythology, the flying serpent is not only a symbol of immortality, it is also an ambiguous symbol both of the source of good and evil, a dialectic of recalling the serpent’s temptation of mankind in the Genesis 3 to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Not surprisingly, these feathered serpents and dragons are also said to have sired a chimerical offspring with mankind:
“The Book of Dyzan … states that) the Sarpa or Great Dragons were the Fifth Race to inhabit the world. The Fourth Race were a race of giants who had lived before the Deluge but were wiped out by that catastrophe. The book relates how the serpent gods or dragons redescended after the Deluge and instructed man in the arts of civilisation. These serpent-gods had a human face and the tail of a dragon*: they founded divine dynasties on Earth and are believed to be the ancestors of our current civilisation, the Fifth race of the Book of Dyzan. The leader of these gods was called “The Great Dragon” [MJF: the Christian Lucifer or Devil, who may be the same being as the (Lizard) Emperor referred to in this session, who I have likened to Prince Marduk].”**
*Q: (L) And could you tell us what the Lizzies look like?
A: Upright alligators with some humanoid features in face.
**An excerpt from R.A. Boulay’s Flying Serpents and Dragons.
Like the giant offspring of the Nephilim described in the Old Testament, the Book of Dyzan also describes the “reptilian-human” offspring of this Fifth Race as practising cannibalism. [MJF: Which makes one think of the terrifying creature photographed at Wookey Hole in Somerset, England (see my earlier post)]
Egyptian art often depicts the slaying of an evil serpent in terms starkly reminiscent of the Christian theme of St George slaying the dragon [MJF: I would add here the similar imagery of St Michael the Archangel in the Book of Revelations where he is depicted plunging his spear into the Devil/Lucifer when hurling him out of heaven whilst uttering the cry “Who is like to God”, which is the actual meaning of the name "Michael"].
The Egyptians also depicted “serpent vehicles” in the Pyramid texts, carrying Osiris in the underworld in a “boat” and then to the stars.
These feathered or flying serpents and dragons are also associated with the notion of kingship*** itself, appearing in the Egyptian pharaoh’s headdress or uraeus. Similarly, the ancient Emperors of China claimed descent from the “Celestial Dragon”, since dragons were “present at the Creation and shared the world with mankind”. Moreover, in China “the dragon was linked with the development of man” and who “taught him the essential arts.” Indeed, “the first humans were considered to have been created by an ancient goddess … who was herself part dragon and part mortal.
***This accords with William Bramley’s account in his book The Gods of Eden of the concept of kingship being passed down by the Edenic gods to mankind:
Q: (L) Who was Hermes Trismegistus?
A: Traitor to court of Pharoah Rana.
Q: (L) Who is Pharoah Rana?
A: Egyptian leader of spiritual covenant.
Q: (L) In what way was Hermes a traitor?
A: Broke covenant of spiritual unity of all peoples in area now known as Middle East.
Q: (L) Who did Hermes betray?
A: Himself; was power hungry.
Q: (L) What acts did he do?
A: Broke covenant; he inspired divisions within ranks of Egyptians, Essenes, Aryans, and Persians et cetera.
Q: (L) What was his purpose in doing this?
A: Divide and conquer as inspired by those referred to as Brotherhood in Bramley book you have read.
Q: (L) Is this the Brotherhood of the snake Hermes formed in rejection of unity?
A: Hermes did not form it; it was long since in existence.
Q: (L) Who was the originator of the Brotherhood of the Serpent as described in the Bramley book?
A: Lizard Beings.
This is an excerpt from William Bramley's The God's of Eden showing the benevolent intent of the ancient serpent knowledge kundalini/enlightenment before the knowledge and Secret Societies were hijacked by the dark faction:
Of all the animals revered in ancient human societies, none were as prominent or as important as the snake. The snake was the logo of a group which had become very influential in early human societies of both hemispheres. That group was a disciplined brotherhood dedicated to the dissemination of spiritual knowledge and the attainment of spiritual freedom. This brotherhood of the snake (also known as the "Brotherhood of the Serpent," but which I will often refer to as the "brotherhood") opposed the enslavement of spiritual beings and according to Egyptian writings, it sought to liberate the human race from custodial bondage. The brotherhood also imparted scientific knowledge and encouraged the high aesthetics that existed in many ancient societies. For these and other reasons, the snake had become a venerated symbol to humans and according to Egyptian and biblical texts, an object of custodial hatred.
When we look to discover who founded the Brotherhood, Mesopotamian texts point right back to that rebellious "god," Prince Ea (Enki). Ancient Mesopotamian tablets relate that Ea and his father, Anu, possessed profound ethical and spiritual knowledge. This was the same knowledge that was later symbolized as trees in the Biblical Adam and Eve story. In fact, the Biblical tree symbol came from pre-biblical Mesopotamian works, such as one showing a snake wrapped around the trunk of a tree, identical to later portrayals of the snake in Eden. From the tree in the Mesopotamian depiction hanging two pieces of fruit. To the right of the tree is the half-moon symbol of Ea; to the left is the planet symbol of Anu. The drawing indicates that Ea and Anu were associated with the snake and its teachings. This connection is affirmed by other Mesopotamian texts which describe Anu's palace in the "heavens" as being guarded by a god of the Tree of Truth and a god of the Tree of Life. In one instance, Ea reportedly sent a human to be educated in that very knowledge [MJF: the Prophet Enoch?].
We therefore find Ea designated as the reputed culprit who tried to teach early man (Adam) the way to spiritual freedom. This suggests that Ea intended his creation, Homo sapiens, to be suited for Earth labour, but at some point he changed his mind about using spiritual enslavement as a means. If Ea was a true historical personality as the Sumerians claimed, then he was the probable leader of the Brotherhood at its founding on Earth. The Brotherhood may have adopted the snake as its logo because Ea's first home on Earth was said to have been constructed by a serpent-infested swampland which Ea called Snake Marsh. Another possible explanation for the snake logo is offered by Mr. Stitchin who says that the Biblical word for "snake" is nahash, which comes from the root word NHSH, meaning "to decipher, to find out."
Despite all their reported good intentions, the legendary Ea and early Brotherhood clearly failed to free the human race. Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and biblical texts relate that the "snake" was quickly defeated by other Custodial factions [MJF: the Lizards]. The Bible informs us that the Serpent in the Garden of Eden was overcome before it was able to complete its mission and give Adam and Eve the "fruit" from the second "tree".
We should read the above in the light of what the C's said here:
Q: (L) Who were Enlil and Enki, the Annunaki of Sumerian stories?
A: Great teachers.
Q: (L) Were they human or extraterrestrial?
A: Extraterrestrial.
Q: (L) Where did they come from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) Was the human race genetically engineered to be slaves?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And who were the genetic engineers of this slavehood?
A: Lizard beings.
The Seraphim - Fiery Serpents
To Farrell’s account I would also add the order of angels which the Jews called the Seraphim, who were viewed as fiery serpents. Quoting from Wikipedia:
A
seraph (
/ˈsɛrəf/, "burning one"; pl:
seraphim /ˈsɛrəfɪm/)
[a] is a celestial or heavenly being originating in Ancient Judaism. Tradition places seraphim in the highest rank in
Christian angelology and in the fifth rank of ten in the
Jewish angelic hierarchy.
In Hebrew, the word
saraph means "burning", and is used seven times throughout the text of the Hebrew Bible as a noun, usually to denote "serpent", twice in the
Book of Numbers, once in the
Book of Deuteronomy, and four times in the
Book of Isaiah. The reason why the word for "burning" was also used to denote a serpent is not universally agreed upon; it may be due to a certain snake species' fiery colors, or perhaps the burning sensation left by its venomous bite. Regardless, its plural form,
seraphim, occurs in both Numbers and Isaiah, but only in Isaiah is it used to denote an angelic being; likewise, these angels are referred to
only as the plural
seraphim – Isaiah later uses the singular
saraph to describe a "
fiery flying serpent", in line with the other uses of the term throughout the Tanakh.
There is emerging consensus that the motifs used to display seraphs in Hyksos-era
Canaan had their original sources in Egyptian
uraeus iconography. In Egyptian iconography, the uraeus was used as a symbol of
sovereignty,
royalty,
divinity and
divine authority, and later iconography often showed uraei with wings. In the early monarchic period of
Israel and
Judah, Egyptian motifs were evidently borrowed by the Israelites
en masse, as a plethora of personal
seals belonging to classes ranging from commonfolk to royalty have been discovered, which incorporate several pieces of ancient Egyptian iconography, including the
winged sun,
ankh, the
hedjet and
deshret crowns of
Upper and
Lower Egypt,
scarabs, and the uraeus cobra. These uraei often had four wings, as opposed to the Egyptian standard which only gave them two. These images have been connected with the
seraphim angels associated with Isaiah's visions, or perhaps more directly to the aforementioned "fiery flying serpent", but this continues to be debated – and an image of serpentine
seraphim clashes with Isaiah's own vision, which clearly envisioned
seraphim with heads, legs, and arms.
The vision in
Isaiah Chapter 6 of seraphim in an idealized version of
Solomon's Temple represents the sole instance in the Hebrew Bible of this word being used to describe celestial beings. "... I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple. Above it stood the seraphim: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly." (Isaiah 6:1–3) And one cried to another, "Holy, holy, holy, is YHWH of hosts: the whole earth is full of His glory." (verses 2–3) One seraph carries out an act of
ritual purification for the prophet by touching his lips with a live coal from the altar (verses 6–7) "And he laid it upon my mouth, and said, Lo, this hath touched thy lips; and thine iniquity is taken away, and thy sin purged."
The text describes the "seraphim" as winged celestial beings with a fiery passion for doing God's good work. Notwithstanding the wording of the text itself, at least one Hebrew scholar claims that in the Hebrew Bible the seraphim do not have the status of angels, and that it is only in later sources (like
De Coelesti Hierarchia or
Summa Theologiae) that they are considered to be a division of the divine messengers.
Seraphim appear in the 2nd-century BC
Book of Enoch, where they are mentioned, in conjunction with
cherubim, as the heavenly creatures standing nearest to the
throne of God. In non-biblical sources
they are sometimes called the Akyəst (Ge'ez: አክይስት "serpents", "dragons"; an alternate term for Hell).
In the
Second Book of Enoch, two classes of celestial beings are mentioned alongside the seraphim and cherubim, known as the
phoenixes and the
chalkydri (
Ancient Greek: χαλκύδραι
khalkýdrai, compound of χαλκός
khalkós "brass, copper" + ὕδρα
hýdra "
hydra", "water-serpent"—lit. "brazen hydras", "copper serpents"). Both are described as "
flying elements of the sun" [
MJF: Hmmm flying saucers anyone but could be comets as well?] that reside in either the 4th or 6th heaven, who have twelve wings and burst into song at sunrise.
Here is the C's on angels though:
Q: (L) Well, the 'angel thing' is pretty big nowadays. There are an awful lot of angels running around. My first thought was: 'what better way for the bad guys to deceive than to appear as angels.'
A: Not true!!! STS CAN appear as entities incorrectly perceived as "angels," but if it is really a sixth density being, incorrect perception is not possible.
And
Q: (L) Well, are there such things as archangels?
A: Maybe.
Q: (L) Well, if there are such things as archangels, how would we perceive them?
A: Too complex.
Finally, just to show that the ancient winged serpent imagery is till very much in use, here is an image of a masonic symbol
View attachment 81471
Image from The Kneph. Official Journal of the Antient and Primitive Rite of Masonry.
Freemason Symbol. The Winged Kneph. In Ancient Egyptian religious art, Kneph refers to a motif, variously a winged egg, a globe surrounded by one or more serpents, or Amun in the form of a serpent called Kematef.
So the 'Brotherhood of the Serpent' seems to be alive and well even in our own age.
I appreciate the sympathies, but they’re not needed. I’m well aware of the atrocities committed by some reptilians to this day, but I was never physically harmed by them. Well, almost. Some were trying to mentally break me down to induce self destruction, while others tried to show me ‘why’ which not only took the fear away but empowered me. There are factions among them too and not everyone is content with the agenda knowing full well that they’ll be sacrificed on a whim during the final push for conquest. Hence their desire to “help” some of us to understand that. The Cs tried to teach us not to see STO and STS as black and white, so not all 4D STS would be considered evil by our human standards. They may have metabolic requirements that we may find unpalatable, but it doesn’t automatically make them evil. Some of them are prisoners of their hierarchical social structure. At the end it will be “all against all” and surprising alliances will be made. As far as hybridization, I have asked on one occasion why some of us carry the “dragon” type DNA and was told “they didn’t breed you [humans] with soldiers.”
