Is China Preparing a 'Special Military Operation' In Taiwan?

The pivot towards China continues


China is considering giving Russia weapons and ammunition for the Ukraine war, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has said.
Mr Blinken told CBS News that Chinese companies were already providing "non-lethal support" to Russia - and new information suggested Beijing could provide "lethal support".
This escalation would mean "serious consequences" for China, he warned.

New information, or 'information' you just made up?

Mr Blinken was speaking to CBS after he met China's top diplomat, Wang Yi, on Saturday at the Munich Security Conference.
He said that during the meeting he expressed "deep concerns" about the "possibility that China will provide lethal material support to Russia".
"To date, we have seen Chinese companies... provide non-lethal support to Russia for use in Ukraine. The concern that we have now is based on information we have that they're considering providing lethal support," he said.
He did not elaborate on what information the US had received about China's potential plans. When pressed on what the US believed China might give to Russia, he said it would be primarily weapons as well as ammunition.
The US has sanctioned a Chinese company for allegedly providing satellite imagery of Ukraine to the mercenary Wagner Group, which supplies Russia with thousands of fighters.
Mr Blinken told CBS that "of course, in China, there's really no distinction between private companies and the state".

Blinken is an expert on all the things that China 'might do'. The details are apparently not important. China is surely under no illusions about the kind of things the US might do - like provoke them into a completely unnecessary conflict.
 
The pivot towards China continues




New information, or 'information' you just made up?



Blinken is an expert on all the things that China 'might do'. The details are apparently not important. China is surely under no illusions about the kind of things the US might do - like provoke them into a completely unnecessary conflict.

China, China, China!

It's happening in Canada, too - the talk of the town is that China interfered in Canada's election, and that Trudeau is Xi's puppet! All on the basis of 'secret CSIS documents'. It all sounds kinda familiar somehow.

The focus of the fear mongering is on China's 'friends' in Canada - non-Chinese Canadians who are secretly collaborators with Xi. This opens up the door for internal suspicion and witch hunting. The piece also targets Chinese students, diplomats, and scientists who have connections with the PRC. This all may get ugly.

To my eye, it looks like a strategy aimed at channeling the growing public anger at Trudeau towards China. Trudeau is China's fault!

CDN conservatives especially will get on board with this - that's what it looks like is happening on Twitter already. Conservative leader Pierre Polievre is already fully on board. The narrative leaves the WEF and the US out of the picture - the two bodies that are way more likely to have actually interfered with CDN affairs.

 
Here is an article published by Attali on his own website on September 9, 2021 concerning the Sino-American relationship and the potential economic and financial dangers for Europeans. The author takes up the hegemonic loss of the United States over the economic world as the basis of events potentially to come. He notes a Chinese intervention on Taiwan, the date of which is symbolized by the hands on the watch face. Which date do you read?

74CAE77D-D3BD-463B-9247-28B940DD9BF4.jpeg

What will happen in the coming years between China and the United States? What consequences will this have on the rest of the world, and in particular on Europe? The question will soon become pervasive. It is time to prepare for it.

For decades, we have admired the Chinese miracle and laughed at the American decline. Both are true: China has experienced a tremendous economic boom, eradicating even the most extreme poverty in the countryside, and building a very modern industry, an industrious middle class, and formidable military power, especially naval. Meanwhile, the United States suffered a thousand economic, financial, racial, and ideological crises; it suffered terrible domestic violence, tragic bombings, and numerous military setbacks abroad.

It was not clear that, at the same time, China was heading straight for formidable contradictions: a market economy cannot cohabit durably with a dictatorship; one or the other must give way. And it is the Chinese market economy that is giving way: the big firms are passing one after the other under the control of the party, which does not accept to let young people, and especially party members, spend their time exchanging on social networks or playing video games or, worse, receiving distance education designed and provided by big private firms; by closing itself, the party will have to motivate these young people by something else than the increase of the standard of living, the purchase of luxury products or the trips abroad; and if it will be very difficult to detoxify those who have already tasted it (and who will live "lying on their couch", as it is whispered now in China. ) The party may think that it is possible to motivate the youngest, by patriotism alone, nourished by a hatred of the foreigner designated as responsible for all the hardships to come. With a stated objective: to take back Taiwan.

In the United States, other formidable contradictions will produce equally devastating consequences: Unable to ensure the growth necessary to support their debts through their expansion on the Chinese market, (and as each time a new crisis is announced), the United States will seek outlets in the military industry, and on other markets, in particular in Europe, whose firms will suffer from more unfair competition than ever from their American competitors, and whose shares will be bought up at any price by American financiers scalded by their losses on the Chinese financial markets

This seizure of the world economy should lead to strong global tension, if not to a war in the China Sea. Unless everyone realizes in time what they have to lose in such an adventure: how could the American public debt be financed if the Chinese no longer bought it, or worse, started to sell it? What would happen to the euro if the dollar collapsed in such a scenario? What would happen to the Chinese economy, and to Chinese employment, if American and European markets closed to Chinese products?

In any case, the worst can't happen, since it is in no one's interest: the two economies are highly integrated; Chinese students are a big hit at American universities; in all, no one could undo such ties. This is also what analysts of the European situation wrote in 1913, noting the extraordinary interweaving of the British and German economies, governed by two grandsons of the same queen (George V and William II, both grandsons of Queen Victoria). And yet, war broke out, to the misfortune of all.

History teaches us that, when it is logical, and even when it is unreasonable, the worst always happens, and faster than expected. Unless we act very decisively to prevent it.

From the simple European point of view, it is urgent to prepare for the hypothesis of the closure of the Chinese market for our firms, and the withdrawal of American troops, who will be occupied elsewhere. We will lose outlets, raw materials and essential components, which will make it impossible for the European economy to function, leaving us at the mercy of invaders that NATO will no longer be able to contain.

This is where, for the Europeans, the serious things will begin.
 
Here is the continuation of the above in another article by the same author published on December 22, 2022. I only pulled out the paragraph of the article that is relevant to my previous post.

« Of course, we cannot exclude the worst: the collapse of the Ukrainian army, a major inflationary slide, a paralysis of France at the time of the announcement of a very unpopular reform of the pension systems (or of a collapse of our health system, or of our school system, both so badly damaged), an offensive by China on Taiwan, to divert attention from the ravages of the Covid pandemic, an Israeli pre-emptive strike on Iran if that country gets too close to nuclear weapons, a North Korean nuclear missile on Japan, chaos in Nigeria and the DRC if the elections that are to take place there are not transparent and accepted by all. »
 
Sorry for the above mishandling, here is the full excerpt from his article.

Of course, we cannot exclude the worst: the collapse of the Ukrainian army, a major inflationary slide, a paralysis of France at the time of the announcement of a very unpopular reform of the pension systems (or of a collapse of our health system, or of our school system, both so badly damaged), an offensive by China on Taiwan, to divert attention from the ravages of the Covid pandemic, an Israeli pre-emptive strike on Iran if that country gets too close to nuclear weapons, a North Korean nuclear missile on Japan, chaos in Nigeria and the DRC if the elections that are to take place there are not transparent and accepted by all.
 
There is a difference between what I write in the post and what is published!
Attali explains that a "Chinese offensive on Taiwan" would also serve to "distract us from the ravages of the Covid pandemic."
 
'The US is sending military "instructors" to Taiwan to prepare its proxy army for war with China.'

23 Feb, 2023

59 minutes ago
 
'The US is preparing for a long war with China.'

Bolton hails Biden’s decision to send US troops to Taiwan

24 February 2023
[...]
“The aim here is not to win a war that China starts; the aim here is to deter China from doing it,” he added. “And believe me, we can do a lot more to do that.”

By Ian DeMartino - 5 hours ago

(Translated by Google)

Chinese Air Force fighter jet chases American aircraft at a distance of only 40 meters

2023-02-25
 
Last edited:

Just hours after his flight left Guangzhou headed back to Paris, China launched large military exercises around the self-ruled island of Taiwan, which China claims as its territory but the U.S. has promised to arm and defend.

Those exercises were a response to Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-Wen’s 10-day diplomatic tour of Central American countries that included a meeting with Republican U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy while she transited in California. People familiar with Macron’s thinking said he was happy Beijing had at least waited until he was out of Chinese airspace before launching the simulated “Taiwan encirclement” exercise.


Macron calls for "strategic autonomy" (as opposed to towing the foreign policies pushed by the US and other nations) among European countries, and argues that in today's climate, this is a good time to do this. He says "Five years ago, strategic autonomy was a pipe dream. Now everyone is talking about it". With the petrodollar waning in power, and some countries voicing their concerns as vassal countries led by the US, it sure does seem that way.
 
'"Strategic autonomy": The war with China over Taiwan will divide the US and EU.'

9 Apr, 2023

1 hour ago
 
'"Strategic autonomy": The war with China over Taiwan will divide the US and EU.'

9 Apr, 2023

1 hour ago
I wonder what happened to Macron .
Is he trying to cross over to the other side?
Did Xi promise him something?
Is he going to join the BRICS?
Will this be a trend in Europe?
I wonder.
 
I wonder what happened to Macron .
Is he trying to cross over to the other side?
Did Xi promise him something?
Is he going to join the BRICS?
Will this be a trend in Europe?
I wonder.
There seem to be lots of protests in parts of EU to get out of NATO. I wonder if this is as much a response to something Xi said or just to work on mollifying protesters. I like it. Let EU handle Russia/Ukraine on their own. Working with NATO weems to have crippled them.
 
Back
Top Bottom