Session 6 December 2014
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
Don Diego
Jedi Master
Thank you very much for this very enlightening session! Again...
I've just start a new job as estate agent where I live in the "deep" South of France, it's amazing the number of people willing to quit cities and searching for farms, found/erect communities, seeking for self sufficient energy and food, people from very different backgrounds aware of what's really going on currently and/or in the near future. Indeed there are so many abandonned little farms ruined by the system...
I've just start a new job as estate agent where I live in the "deep" South of France, it's amazing the number of people willing to quit cities and searching for farms, found/erect communities, seeking for self sufficient energy and food, people from very different backgrounds aware of what's really going on currently and/or in the near future. Indeed there are so many abandonned little farms ruined by the system...
F
forge
Guest
Thinking about injuries of the triple cycle veil and consequent leaking since reading it first Monday night, it was super worth to publish this personal info.
F
forge
Guest
@Quinault
@Skyalmian
@Stoneboss
"I'm interested in contributing more. I don't enough at all."
"I've also been "sitting on the fence" for way too long. I even joined the FOTCM quite some time ago and I'm still not an active member. And I know why."
When you come to this site and Sott (or the book store) to check, if there is anything new you most interested in, think about that, when you decide to donate even small amounts. What do you value most to read, listen to and have that Laura, Ark and the QFG team publishes? Say those things, list them in your mind, the new sessions, podcasts, books, workshops and try to say something like:
- Thank you for the books, thank you for the sessions, thank you the invaluable info that you and the Team gave me! I really VALUE your important work, because thanks to your efforts and research, my life got a lot better! Thanks to you I have found my aim - that I can help you even from afar. I can strengthen the Fellowship from where I live. Thanks to Your research and sharing your results: Laura, the QFG Team, Ark, I truly VALUE your efforts!
Quote from Session 21 June 2014
@Skyalmian
@Stoneboss
"I'm interested in contributing more. I don't enough at all."
"I've also been "sitting on the fence" for way too long. I even joined the FOTCM quite some time ago and I'm still not an active member. And I know why."
When you come to this site and Sott (or the book store) to check, if there is anything new you most interested in, think about that, when you decide to donate even small amounts. What do you value most to read, listen to and have that Laura, Ark and the QFG team publishes? Say those things, list them in your mind, the new sessions, podcasts, books, workshops and try to say something like:
- Thank you for the books, thank you for the sessions, thank you the invaluable info that you and the Team gave me! I really VALUE your important work, because thanks to your efforts and research, my life got a lot better! Thanks to you I have found my aim - that I can help you even from afar. I can strengthen the Fellowship from where I live. Thanks to Your research and sharing your results: Laura, the QFG Team, Ark, I truly VALUE your efforts!
Quote from Session 21 June 2014
Bastian
The Living Force
Thank you Laura & all others involved for this enlightening session (as usual).
I was particularly interested in this part about French nuclear plants flight over by drones :
My thoughts about that affair were :
1/ who is able to plan and realize such an (seemingly military spying) operation ?
I doubt it can be any small group, such as any so-called "Muslim terrorists". Only quite (not even medium) powerful groups : powerful countries' army/secret services. So maybe USA, Russia, China, UK, etc.
2/ who are the world leaders in drone technology ?
To my knowledge, the USA and Israel...
3/ in the current world strategic context, for whom is it useful to try such an operation ? (that is : a threat against nuclear power plants in France, or against France itself, or even Europe according to the expert in nuclear plants in this article/video :
http://fr.sott.net/article/23791-Drones-l-hypothese-inquietante-d-un-expert-en-energie-nucleaire )
Certainly not Russia, because it would give an incredible excuse to their enemies to begin a war (if needed !), if recognized.
So, the Cs' answers about the author (NSA, Mossad or CIA etc.) and the aim (keeping the pressure on France - in the context of (c)overt war against Russia) looks quite logical.
And there was a mystery (to my mind) that it solves, too :
4/ who is able to do that (flying drones over the nuclear plants of a technologically/militarily developed country such as France, anonymously) to gather informations they would not be able to obtain with a spy satellite ? Of course the USA for instance would probably not need some drone flying over a French nuclear plant - their spy satellites are probably sufficient. But, as a disguised threat rather than a spying operation, it's a lot more meaningful.
So, thanks again.
PS : planning a false flag (but real) attack on French nuclear plants, and accusing Russia of authoring it, is definitively the American/Israelian (deep government) way to procede ! It's even their own signature (cf. this presumed motto : "by way of deception, you'll do/win the war").
Edit : sentences from the extract put in bold.
I was particularly interested in this part about French nuclear plants flight over by drones :
Laura said:
My thoughts about that affair were :
1/ who is able to plan and realize such an (seemingly military spying) operation ?
I doubt it can be any small group, such as any so-called "Muslim terrorists". Only quite (not even medium) powerful groups : powerful countries' army/secret services. So maybe USA, Russia, China, UK, etc.
2/ who are the world leaders in drone technology ?
To my knowledge, the USA and Israel...
3/ in the current world strategic context, for whom is it useful to try such an operation ? (that is : a threat against nuclear power plants in France, or against France itself, or even Europe according to the expert in nuclear plants in this article/video :
http://fr.sott.net/article/23791-Drones-l-hypothese-inquietante-d-un-expert-en-energie-nucleaire )
Certainly not Russia, because it would give an incredible excuse to their enemies to begin a war (if needed !), if recognized.
So, the Cs' answers about the author (NSA, Mossad or CIA etc.) and the aim (keeping the pressure on France - in the context of (c)overt war against Russia) looks quite logical.
And there was a mystery (to my mind) that it solves, too :
4/ who is able to do that (flying drones over the nuclear plants of a technologically/militarily developed country such as France, anonymously) to gather informations they would not be able to obtain with a spy satellite ? Of course the USA for instance would probably not need some drone flying over a French nuclear plant - their spy satellites are probably sufficient. But, as a disguised threat rather than a spying operation, it's a lot more meaningful.
So, thanks again.
PS : planning a false flag (but real) attack on French nuclear plants, and accusing Russia of authoring it, is definitively the American/Israelian (deep government) way to procede ! It's even their own signature (cf. this presumed motto : "by way of deception, you'll do/win the war").
Edit : sentences from the extract put in bold.
syldan
Dagobah Resident
While reading what Bastian has posted, a flash came to me of the photo platsering the media outlets from the 'unscheduled' meeting 'required' by François Hollande a week or sa back with President Poutine. The French Presidential plane stopped over 'inadvertantly' in Moscow?! Also, considering the event a week earlier with South Stream when Turkey ie: Erdogan clearly went against NATO diktat.
In the world of such people, if the french secret service had wind of something in the NATO false flag variety being planned in France in order to blame Russia somehow - i mean there are precedents, that by warning Poutine, Hollande was protecting his country it's relationship with Russia because once it is out in the open, the false flag can simply not go on as planned? That would explain President Poutine's glowing smile coming out of the meeting with Hollande? I may be out on a weak limb here? But i also noticed how right-wing political opponents of Hollande, in Marine LePen, and also Marina LePen, have come out to say publicly how much Russia is an ally of France, since this event?! fwiw
In the world of such people, if the french secret service had wind of something in the NATO false flag variety being planned in France in order to blame Russia somehow - i mean there are precedents, that by warning Poutine, Hollande was protecting his country it's relationship with Russia because once it is out in the open, the false flag can simply not go on as planned? That would explain President Poutine's glowing smile coming out of the meeting with Hollande? I may be out on a weak limb here? But i also noticed how right-wing political opponents of Hollande, in Marine LePen, and also Marina LePen, have come out to say publicly how much Russia is an ally of France, since this event?! fwiw
Inquorate said:
Well, don't know if you are on social networks, but you could share SOTT articles and videos there, also Laura's books. Write reviews on Amazon, etc. Basically, anything that may assist with more people knowing about the site and Laura's work. It doesn't have to be pushy or "conspiratorial", just a friendly sharing of stuff you are curious about. fwiw.
cubbex
The Living Force
Thanks for the session and sharing.
Regarding the psychic stuff. I've recently began to take melatonin again, for one reason or another through some of the weirdes dreaming, I have dealt with a lot of bagagge I've been holding the past years.
What is exactly the psychomantum? is just a dark room with a mirror? if that is the case, wouldn't any room with a normal mirror in the night a psychomantum? what could be something similar? what is the mechanism?
Regarding the psychic stuff. I've recently began to take melatonin again, for one reason or another through some of the weirdes dreaming, I have dealt with a lot of bagagge I've been holding the past years.
What is exactly the psychomantum? is just a dark room with a mirror? if that is the case, wouldn't any room with a normal mirror in the night a psychomantum? what could be something similar? what is the mechanism?
Keit said:Inquorate said:
Well, don't know if you are on social networks, but you could share SOTT articles and videos there, also Laura's books. Write reviews on Amazon, etc. Basically, anything that may assist with more people knowing about the site and Laura's work. It doesn't have to be pushy or "conspiratorial", just a friendly sharing of stuff you are curious about. fwiw.
I agree. Twittering Sott articles with your thoughts and comments and posting on Facebook really does have a butterfly effect. You network with people who share your views. It's a great medium to support the Aims of our group here.
http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141213/eu--russia_reaches_out-314f993d1b.htmlromochar said:
=================
As for the Holland surprise visit to visit Senor Putin... the first I heard of that was from the Sorcha Faal site: whatdoesitmean A site that is most interesting in that it openly states that they are getting their information straight from the Kremlin... imagine the media circus here in the West admitting the same? Or Tel Aviv etc?
Can you just imagine? 
s-kur
Jedi Council Member
It's could be disjointed but i'll try to do it as clearly as I can...
The matter is "Personal questions in our lives"
Recently I've speculated about interactions with people who not involved in the Work properly. In our lives we can see many cases of asking by some person. Often such requests have an egoistic nature (no matter weither narcissistic nor OP\psychopatic person). If we decide give a feedback\help we spend our energy. Since the nature of the most people is egoistic, even if their request looks very pure we rarely get our spent energy back. I understand that the edge between egoistic\clear intentions is very thin but what is the key to see a real intentions? Or key is only experience? We have an intentions to put efforts\provide energy in the network, but some of us are puzzling with "help everyone who ask". Thus, we lose our energy, without energy we can't DO.
For example: Someone talk me that he hadn't money and he hunger. I can give him a pie. Another hunger asks me...I give him a pie again and again. Despite of all my kindness an efforts I can't feed them all. But! If a had not been done it and I just have an idea without anticipations is there real opportunity that I'll meet collinear people who have the same idea and we'll open a "kitchen soup", as Laura call it. Thus, we could feed most of them :)
Maybe it's incorrect example, though, it's the only came to my mind)
Total question: how to distinguish intentions for the purpose to save energy for more constructive DOing?
I came across this thought when I was contemplating the links between narcissism and energetic vampirism. The overcome of such ineractions is total lose of own energy an need to get it from others. Serving to self, as we know it.
BTW, maybe here is the keys to understanding G's words (paraphrasing) "To become the altruist it is necessary to become the full egoist at first"
The matter is "Personal questions in our lives"
Recently I've speculated about interactions with people who not involved in the Work properly. In our lives we can see many cases of asking by some person. Often such requests have an egoistic nature (no matter weither narcissistic nor OP\psychopatic person). If we decide give a feedback\help we spend our energy. Since the nature of the most people is egoistic, even if their request looks very pure we rarely get our spent energy back. I understand that the edge between egoistic\clear intentions is very thin but what is the key to see a real intentions? Or key is only experience? We have an intentions to put efforts\provide energy in the network, but some of us are puzzling with "help everyone who ask". Thus, we lose our energy, without energy we can't DO.
For example: Someone talk me that he hadn't money and he hunger. I can give him a pie. Another hunger asks me...I give him a pie again and again. Despite of all my kindness an efforts I can't feed them all. But! If a had not been done it and I just have an idea without anticipations is there real opportunity that I'll meet collinear people who have the same idea and we'll open a "kitchen soup", as Laura call it. Thus, we could feed most of them :)
Maybe it's incorrect example, though, it's the only came to my mind)
Total question: how to distinguish intentions for the purpose to save energy for more constructive DOing?
I came across this thought when I was contemplating the links between narcissism and energetic vampirism. The overcome of such ineractions is total lose of own energy an need to get it from others. Serving to self, as we know it.
BTW, maybe here is the keys to understanding G's words (paraphrasing) "To become the altruist it is necessary to become the full egoist at first"
A.K.
Padawan Learner
Thank you for putting this latest great session, fantastic crew.
In my opinion, conserving energy and helping others means to read the signs of whether i'm helping an O.P. or a souled thus it's
important 'see' who is who thus limit our interaction with them. Of course need to throw in STS vs STO into the mix as well. All these need
to have good feedback mechanism, awareness & not being subjective. All in all putting our WORK into usage.
In my opinion, conserving energy and helping others means to read the signs of whether i'm helping an O.P. or a souled thus it's
important 'see' who is who thus limit our interaction with them. Of course need to throw in STS vs STO into the mix as well. All these need
to have good feedback mechanism, awareness & not being subjective. All in all putting our WORK into usage.