For anyone who has not seen this documentary, it is a marker between what could have been and what is - the why's of it still lurk behind the scenes and are humanities present danger, or so it seems.
That's a great way of putting it. As though - with the deaths of JFK, RFK, MLK - the US (at least) was firmly set on a highly negative course of action and eventualities. What might it have meant for the world if these men hadn't been assassinated? This film conveys these tragedies - is well constructed, weighty, thoughtful and packs a heck of an objective reality punch. I've watched it three times and its several hours long!
In related subject matter, and in case no one's caught it, Trump recently said:
"[...] I have a lot of enemies out there. This may be the last time you'll see me for a while. A lot of very, very rich enemies, but they are not happy with what I'm doing,"
President Donald Trump gave a dire warning during a speech about an executive order on prescription drugs that has many scratching their heads. The president signed the order on Thursday which directed some federal agencies to prioritize...
www.sott.net
Now no doubt Trump has a tendency of exaggerating and being bombastic, but given the high level of enemies he has made in Washington (along with some newer ones apparently) and the outrageous displays of desperation on the part of the Dems
and their cliques to take back power in the US, I fear anything can happen. It's possible that Trump was tipped off by someone 'in the know' - that he should be very careful going forward, and that Trump in turn wanted people to know in the most appropriate way that he could communicate it; he's in some danger.
When I read the above article I was also reminded of some attention Tulsi Gabbard got several months ago when she was seen in public carrying James W. Douglass's book
JFK And The Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters. I've never read it, but the book is very highly regarded among those who accept that JFK's death had to be have been at the hands of elements of the US government, and it discusses the difficulty that people have in coming to terms with such a truth. I'm pretty sure this book has been discussed on the forum some time ago.
In any case, looking back, Gabbard was extremely outspoken, gutsy and very smart about her campaign - and was taking no prisoners! Recall how she went after Killary when Killary made those defamatory statements suggesting that Gabbard may somehow be connected to the Russian government... The DNC was also not giving Tulsi the recognition she earned and deserved as a viable candidate for the Democratic party because she clearly was not following the party line, and proved that she was her own person. And then Tulsi dropped out of the race and the news completely. But, anyway, why carry the book around? Was she trying to say something to the public? Could she have been threatened with violence if she were to persist in being so outspoken and a threat to the status quo Dems? It wouldn't surprise me to learn that something like that had happened. But who knows.
Which brings me back to Evidence of Revision. For anyone who's never seen it, it is a guaranteed eye-opener and quite affecting on top of it. And speaks to the incredible amount of control the media has in shaping a narrative. Its available on Amazon,
here. For those in Europe and internationally
here. And is the only video content besides
Éiriú Eolas that the forum has gotten behind and/or produced and sells.