JFK Documentary - Evidence Of Revision

Mr. Premise said:
The only thing about the documentary I don't agree with is the implication that Lyndon Johnson was a prime mover in the plot. He wasn't high up enough to be that. The people who backed his career, however, we're. These would be the Texas oil and resource extraction industries plus Brown and Root. I think LBJ was tipped off before, though.

I dunno. The evidence of his involvement was pretty damning. I used to think what you just wrote, but sort of changed my mind a bit.
 
Perceval said:
Well, you also have to allow for idiots in the intel agencies and other groups that were involved. Some of them can't hold their tongue.
That was my thought :lol2:

I got another copy of this with spanish subtitles so that my parents could watch it, and so far they're fascinated and shocked by what they've seen. The Bobby Kennedy one in particular really surprised my mom.
 
I just saw the first part. I love it. Love it. Love it. Last month I just finished to read "JFK and the unspeakable" so I was able to understand everything, putting images and faces. I love also the music, very good. And the script is incredible.

I really love JFK. More I learn about him more I admire him.
 
Bumping this thread last posted in from a few years ago.

Having reviewed this documentary before in whole and making comments, decided to revisit the documentary in all its parts. From start to finish it is most powerful in its presentation. For much of the documentary, the viewer is able to listen to the words, see the linking historical visual narrative with focus on inconvenient evidence that history shows is glossed over or never presented. From JFK forward to his brother RFK, to the machinations of mind control projects and Jim Jones, and finishing on the murder of MLK.

For the most part, the documentary offers the viewer and listener the ability to roll the evidence over and arrive at personal conclusions. Interestingly, since my first viewing, there has been many articles and alternative positions on these murder subjects. However, when this film is viewed coupled with people like Fletcher Prouty and his 'JKF' or 'Secret Team' book, this film makes all the more sense.

Will one ever really know what exactly happened in all these cases, not likley - by layered design. Yet the underlying truth is that there is a cabal of very interconnected-powerful, mean and nasty psychopaths running the show, and the three murders above were the results of their hatred and their further hatred to anyone or any country that became obstacles to their greed and plans.

For anyone who has not seen this documentary, it is a marker between what could have been and what is - the why's of it still lurk behind the scenes and are humanities present danger, or so it seems.
 
Great review. Did you put it on amazon and wherever else such reviews are welcomed?

Some peeps here had to watch it over and over again when it was being subtitled and that was a very depressing period.
 
Thank you for the reminder voyageur. I have a copy buried somewhere that I shall dig out and watch as I did not manage to watch is from beginning to end. Funnily enough, I had another reminder to watch this the other day and it was from an episode of The Simpsons (Diatribe of a mad housewife):

 
loreta said:
I just saw the first part. I love it. Love it. Love it. Last month I just finished to read "JFK and the unspeakable" so I was able to understand everything, putting images and faces. I love also the music, very good. And the script is incredible.

I really love JFK. More I learn about him more I admire him.

Perhaps it may be better to emulate his sacrifice. Which puts fear within the Psychopath's progress.

johnfkennedy105511.jpg


And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what, together, we can do for the freedom of man.” – John F. Kennedy

4d5ccff5c16c8a2f32398458a02d6acb.jpg


john-f-kennedy-jfk-quote-liberal-portrait-political-meme.jpg


JFK's 10 Best Speeches

https://youtu.be/6DbhTwahqPg
 
Gregory Doudna has a Ph.D in bible studies, but made an interview and published on his academia page a paper:

BILLIONAIRE LOGIC AND THE FATE OF JFK: Interview with John Curington, Right-hand Man and Attorney to H.L. Hunt of Dallas, Texas (the Richest Man in the World in 1963), Concerning the Assassination of President Kennedy

See also the text posted on Billionaire Logic and the Death of JFK
It begins:
Texas oilman H. L. Hunt (1889-1974) of Dallas, Texas, was the richest man in the world in the 1960s—oil, natural gas, land, companies producing food and energy, worldwide.

Mr. Hunt was also America’s pre-eminent producer and purveyor of conservative, anti-communist ideology, through a daily radio program broadcast, at its peak, on over five hundred radio stations across America called
Life Line. Hunt backed politicians who held political views he thought were best for business and for the country, and he was a close associate of J. Edgar Hoover, the long-time director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Hunt had a special phone line to Hoover and they talked frequently back and forth, on matters affecting the nation’s business.

Hunt’s
Life Line program was relentlessly critical of President John F. Kennedy—for “creeping socialism,” for being soft on America’s enemies abroad and their fellow-travellers domestically, for cozying up to the satanic United Nations and the one-worlders behind that organization intent on America’s destruction.

One of Hunt’s sons, Bunker Hunt, helped pay the cost of a black-bordered full-page newspaper ad accusing Kennedy of traitorous actions. Its headline was: “Welcome Mr. Kennedy: Why Are You a Communist?” The black borders were like a funeral notice. This ad appeared in the
Dallas Morning News on Friday, November 22, 1963. It was seeing that ad which prompted Kennedy to remark to Jacqueline at their hotel that morning, “We’re heading into nut country.”

November 22, 1963 was the day President Kennedy and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy visited Dallas, overriding futile private pleas of people like Adlai Stevenson and Sen. William Fulbright to Kennedy not to make that trip, out of concern for his safety. But the trip had been planned and was regarded as politically necessary in the runup to the 1964 presidential elections. H. L. Hunt’s political ally and fellow Texan, Vice-President Lyndon Johnson—at that moment under investigation in Congress for a corruption scandal with a growing likelihood of being dumped from the Kennedy ticket in 1964 and ending up in disgrace—had spent the preceding month at his Texas ranch preparing for Kennedy’s visit to Texas.
 
The Occam Razor states:

"when you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better."

As a case of a more general principle:

"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate"


The simplest explanation for the assasination of JFK is easy. Luis Posada Carriles wan nearby, in Dallas.
This guy noy only bombed cubana 455 flygth https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bf/Cubana_flight_455_document2.JPG and put some bombs in Havana, in 1995, so killing an annoying President was "pecata minuta" for him.
 
Last edited:
For anyone who has not seen this documentary, it is a marker between what could have been and what is - the why's of it still lurk behind the scenes and are humanities present danger, or so it seems.

That's a great way of putting it. As though - with the deaths of JFK, RFK, MLK - the US (at least) was firmly set on a highly negative course of action and eventualities. What might it have meant for the world if these men hadn't been assassinated? This film conveys these tragedies - is well constructed, weighty, thoughtful and packs a heck of an objective reality punch. I've watched it three times and its several hours long!

In related subject matter, and in case no one's caught it, Trump recently said:

"[...] I have a lot of enemies out there. This may be the last time you'll see me for a while. A lot of very, very rich enemies, but they are not happy with what I'm doing,"


Now no doubt Trump has a tendency of exaggerating and being bombastic, but given the high level of enemies he has made in Washington (along with some newer ones apparently) and the outrageous displays of desperation on the part of the Dems and their cliques to take back power in the US, I fear anything can happen. It's possible that Trump was tipped off by someone 'in the know' - that he should be very careful going forward, and that Trump in turn wanted people to know in the most appropriate way that he could communicate it; he's in some danger.

When I read the above article I was also reminded of some attention Tulsi Gabbard got several months ago when she was seen in public carrying James W. Douglass's book JFK And The Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters. I've never read it, but the book is very highly regarded among those who accept that JFK's death had to be have been at the hands of elements of the US government, and it discusses the difficulty that people have in coming to terms with such a truth. I'm pretty sure this book has been discussed on the forum some time ago.

Gabbard with JFK And The Unspeakable.jpg

In any case, looking back, Gabbard was extremely outspoken, gutsy and very smart about her campaign - and was taking no prisoners! Recall how she went after Killary when Killary made those defamatory statements suggesting that Gabbard may somehow be connected to the Russian government... The DNC was also not giving Tulsi the recognition she earned and deserved as a viable candidate for the Democratic party because she clearly was not following the party line, and proved that she was her own person. And then Tulsi dropped out of the race and the news completely. But, anyway, why carry the book around? Was she trying to say something to the public? Could she have been threatened with violence if she were to persist in being so outspoken and a threat to the status quo Dems? It wouldn't surprise me to learn that something like that had happened. But who knows.

Which brings me back to Evidence of Revision. For anyone who's never seen it, it is a guaranteed eye-opener and quite affecting on top of it. And speaks to the incredible amount of control the media has in shaping a narrative. Its available on Amazon, here. For those in Europe and internationally here. And is the only video content besides Éiriú Eolas that the forum has gotten behind and/or produced and sells.
 
As a little side note, I have to express my disappointment with Tulsi. She was all ‘gung ho’ and ‘anti-establishment’ at the beginning of her race, but gradually she started to ‘sell out’ her principles, and finally ended up endorsing creepy uncle Joe Biden! It’s not black and white, of course, that because of this she’s all bad - but it’s evidence of her not quite being what she let many people believe she was.

In the current system it’s near impossible to advance without selling out, but I had a ‘fools hope’ at the beginning of her political career that she would be the exception
 
Evidence of Revision DVD is not available on Amazon any more. I saw it at the end of Pierre‘s book and wanted to see available options for watching.
Is there any other way to order it or watch it?

Secondly, I have no CD/DVD reader; is it available in online digital format or for download?
I can put a donation and you send me link, or something….? Any other suggestions?

Thank you!
 
Are you sure it's no longer available? I was able to add it to my cart and go to "check out" -it would arrive by Tuesday? I already have a copy so didn't press "place order" though.
 
Back
Top Bottom