The following article continues the theme of looking at esoteric or occult symbols that conceal a hidden hyperdimensional physics, which has only become apparent in our own more scientifically advanced age that can now appreciate such concepts. Although we have looked at some of the ideas presented in this article previously on this thread, the article seeks to connect what on the surface seem to be a number of random, unconnected things. I hope it will generate a lively discussion.
The Hexagon and the Star of David
Recently, we have been looking at the ways in which the Atlanteans sought to preserve for posterity their advanced scientific and technological knowledge after suffering a cataclysm that all but annihilated their society, an event we now know as the Deluge or the Biblical Flood.
We have seen evidence that they did this primarily through myths, which contained hidden allegories (e.g., Plato’s Cave and his description of the capitol city of Atlantis) and through certain symbols, which came to form part of an occulted, esoteric wisdom that was preserved within mystery schools such the Pythagoreans (as sacred geometry), the Dionysian Mysteries cults, the Cabbalists and the Essenes for example, and was eventually inherited by groups such as the Assassins, the Knights Templar, the Freemasons and the modern Rosicrucians.
We have looked at possible hyperdimensional scientific models based around the pyramid (the tetractys) or tetrahedron, projective geometry and the potential relevance of prime numbers, following the C’s clues. However, for the purposes of this article, I would like to focus on one particular symbol and that is the hexagon and the device it is most often linked with within occult or cabbalistic teachings, the Star of David.
We have seen evidence that they did this primarily through myths, which contained hidden allegories (e.g., Plato’s Cave and his description of the capitol city of Atlantis) and through certain symbols, which came to form part of an occulted, esoteric wisdom that was preserved within mystery schools such the Pythagoreans (as sacred geometry), the Dionysian Mysteries cults, the Cabbalists and the Essenes for example, and was eventually inherited by groups such as the Assassins, the Knights Templar, the Freemasons and the modern Rosicrucians.
We have looked at possible hyperdimensional scientific models based around the pyramid (the tetractys) or tetrahedron, projective geometry and the potential relevance of prime numbers, following the C’s clues. However, for the purposes of this article, I would like to focus on one particular symbol and that is the hexagon and the device it is most often linked with within occult or cabbalistic teachings, the Star of David.
The Star of David emblem (see above) is created from two intersecting equilateral triangles that form what is known as a ‘hexagram’.
Quoting from Wikipedia:
A hexagram (Greek) or sexagram (Latin) is a six-pointed geometric star figure with the Schläfli symbol {6/2}, 2{3}, or {{3}}. Since there are no true regular continuous hexagrams, the term is instead used to refer to a compound figure of two equilateral triangles. The intersection is a regular hexagon.
The hexagram is part of an infinite series of shapes which are compounds of two n-dimensional simplices. In three dimensions, the analogous compound is the stellated octahedron, and in four dimensions the compound of two 5-cells is obtained.
[The hexagram] has been historically used in religious and cultural contexts and as decorative motifs. The symbol was used as a decorative motif in medieval Christian churches and Jewish synagogues. The hexagram is thought to have originated in Buddhism and was also used by Hindus before it appeared in Judaism. In Judaism it was first used by King David 885 BC and was later adopted by Muslims as a mystic symbol in the medieval period, where it was known as the Seal of Solomon, and depicted as either a hexagram or a pentagram.
Quoting from Wikipedia:
A hexagram (Greek) or sexagram (Latin) is a six-pointed geometric star figure with the Schläfli symbol {6/2}, 2{3}, or {{3}}. Since there are no true regular continuous hexagrams, the term is instead used to refer to a compound figure of two equilateral triangles. The intersection is a regular hexagon.
The hexagram is part of an infinite series of shapes which are compounds of two n-dimensional simplices. In three dimensions, the analogous compound is the stellated octahedron, and in four dimensions the compound of two 5-cells is obtained.
[The hexagram] has been historically used in religious and cultural contexts and as decorative motifs. The symbol was used as a decorative motif in medieval Christian churches and Jewish synagogues. The hexagram is thought to have originated in Buddhism and was also used by Hindus before it appeared in Judaism. In Judaism it was first used by King David 885 BC and was later adopted by Muslims as a mystic symbol in the medieval period, where it was known as the Seal of Solomon, and depicted as either a hexagram or a pentagram.
Group theory
In mathematics, the root system for the simple Lie group G2 is in the form of a hexagram, with six long roots and six short roots.
Construction by linear algebra
A regular hexagram can be constructed by orthographically projecting any cube onto a plane through three vertices that are all adjacent to the same vertex. The twelve midpoints to edges of the cube form a hexagram. For example, consider the projection of the unit cube with vertices that are all adjacent to the same vertex. The twelve midpoints to edges of the cube form a hexagram. For example, consider the projection of the unit cube with vertices at the eight possible binary vectors in three dimensions (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), (0, 0, 1), (1, 1, 0), (1. 0. 1), (0, 1, 1), (1, 1, 1) on to the plane x+ y + z = 1. The midpoints are (0, 0, ½), (0, ½, ½), (0, 1, ½), (1, 1, ½), and all points resulting from these by applying a permutation to their entries. These 12 points project to a hexagram: six vertices around the outer hexagon and six on the inner.
A regular hexagram, {6}[2{3}]{6}, can be seen as a compound composed of an upwards (blue here) and downwards (pink) facing equilateral triangle, with their intersection as a regular hexagon (in green).
The oldest known depiction of a six-pointed star (dating back to the 3rd millennium BC.) was excavated in the Ashtarak burial mound in “Nerkin Naver” (in Historic Armenia). [MJF: This would therefore predate the foundation of Judaism and the historic origins of the Abraham/Mosaic Hebrews or Israelites.]
The hexagram is also a mandala symbol called satkona yantra or sadkona yantra found on ancient South Indian Hindu temples. It symbolizes the nara-narayana, or perfect meditative state of balance achieved between Man and God, and if maintained, results in "moksha," or "nirvana" (release from the bounds of the earthly world and its material trappings) [MJF: bear this in mind for later].
Some researchers have theorized that the hexagram represents the astrological chart at the time of David's birth or anointment as king. The hexagram is also known as the "King's Star" in astrological circles.
In antique papyri, pentagrams, together with stars and other signs, are frequently found on amulets bearing the Jewish names of God* and used to guard against fever and other diseases. Curiously the hexagram is not found among these signs. In the Greek Magical Papyri (Wessely, l.c. pp. 31, 112) at Paris and London there are 22 signs side by side, and a circle with twelve signs, but neither a pentagram nor a hexagram.
*The most common name of God in the Hebrew Bible is the Tetragrammaton, יהוה, that is usually transcribed as YHWH.
The oldest known depiction of a six-pointed star (dating back to the 3rd millennium BC.) was excavated in the Ashtarak burial mound in “Nerkin Naver” (in Historic Armenia). [MJF: This would therefore predate the foundation of Judaism and the historic origins of the Abraham/Mosaic Hebrews or Israelites.]
The hexagram is also a mandala symbol called satkona yantra or sadkona yantra found on ancient South Indian Hindu temples. It symbolizes the nara-narayana, or perfect meditative state of balance achieved between Man and God, and if maintained, results in "moksha," or "nirvana" (release from the bounds of the earthly world and its material trappings) [MJF: bear this in mind for later].
Some researchers have theorized that the hexagram represents the astrological chart at the time of David's birth or anointment as king. The hexagram is also known as the "King's Star" in astrological circles.
In antique papyri, pentagrams, together with stars and other signs, are frequently found on amulets bearing the Jewish names of God* and used to guard against fever and other diseases. Curiously the hexagram is not found among these signs. In the Greek Magical Papyri (Wessely, l.c. pp. 31, 112) at Paris and London there are 22 signs side by side, and a circle with twelve signs, but neither a pentagram nor a hexagram.
*The most common name of God in the Hebrew Bible is the Tetragrammaton, יהוה, that is usually transcribed as YHWH.
The Hebrew Name of God as inscribed on the page of a Sephardic
manuscript of the Hebrew Bible (1385)
The Star of Davidmanuscript of the Hebrew Bible (1385)
The Star of David is a symbol commonly associated with Judaism and the Jewish People. In Hebrew, it is called Magen David (“Shield of David”).
The Magen David is today a generally recognized symbol of Judaism and Jewish identity and is also known colloquially as the Jewish Star. Its usage as a sign of Jewish identity began in the Middle Ages, though its religious usage began earlier, with the current earliest archaeological evidence being a stone bearing the shield from the arch of a 3–4th century synagogue in the Galilee.
The Magen David is today a generally recognized symbol of Judaism and Jewish identity and is also known colloquially as the Jewish Star. Its usage as a sign of Jewish identity began in the Middle Ages, though its religious usage began earlier, with the current earliest archaeological evidence being a stone bearing the shield from the arch of a 3–4th century synagogue in the Galilee.
The Star of David in the oldest surviving complete copy of the Masoretic text, the Leningrad Codex, dated 1008.
The first thing that strikes me about the image above is how similar it looks to an eastern mandala. This may be no accident. The Jewish religion emerged in the Middle East but before the religion took shape under Abraham/Moses, the people who would become the Hebrews, Israelites and eventually the Jews were part of a larger body of Semitic people who as Scythian Celts had migrated from central Asia into the Middle East. They would establish themselves first in Mesopotamia, then dominated by the Sumerians, where they would be, as new immigrants, very much the underdogs. The Sumerians had long had trade contact with the Indian sub-continent and Indian culture, philosophy and religious concepts had permeated Sumerian society over time. Eventually, these Scythians would take over the Sumeria empire and establish a new Akkadian empire under Sargon the Great, the first great 'Akkadian' king of Sumeria, who the C’s described as a ‘deep level punctuator’ (coming from the subterranean Aryan civilisation):
Q: (L) Well, we should have figured that. There's hardly been anybody else running things for the last 300 thousand years or so. Okay, going in another direction: what other names were the Danaans known by?
A: Scythians. [MJF: So the Danaans were Scythian Celts who would eventually end up in Northern Europe and may well have been the Tribe of Dan and the Tuatha de Danaan in Ireland]
Q: (L) How did the Scythians get to Egypt?
A: VIA Akkad.
Q: (L) Was Sargon a Scythian?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Were the Hittites a genetically altered group of Scythians? [MJF: And let us not forget that Abraham/Moses was a Hittite, as well as being a Levite.]
A: Close.
However, it would be this period of subjection under Sumerian rule that would act as an ancient folk memory for the later Exodus from Egypt. The C’s placed this original Exodus as far back as 2,664 BC:
Session 30 September 1994:
Q: (L) What year did the Exodus occur counting backward from now according to our calendrical system?
A: 4670.16
Q: (L) At that time did a cometary Venus pass close to the earth and cause disruption?
A: Yes.
[…]
Q: (L) Which is the older civilization: Sumerian or Egyptian?
A: Sumerian. [MJF: By this I think they mean the Egyptian civilisation of the Pharaohs, not the non-Egyptian civilisation that built the Pyramids at Giza in 8,800 BC]
We should also remember here that India’s Hindu religion and culture based, on the Vedic scriptures, was derived from descendants of the Paranthas (who were Atlanteans):
Q: Were the Vedas written by the Paranthas or written by the Celts?
A: Descendants of Paranthas, as per "Divine guidance."
Hence, esoteric symbols like the hexagram may have made their way from India to Sumeria and Egypt and would eventually find their way into the iconography of Judaism. However, when exactly the motif was adopted by the Mosaic Jews is a moot point. In a bizarre twist on history, the Jews would find themselves back in Mesopotamia as slaves again after the fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians in 587 BC, the Babylonians having succeeded to the old Akkadian empire of Sargon the Great. Thus, it is possible that the Star of David symbol was co-opted into Judaism during the Babylonian diaspora. Whatever was the means by which the hexagram or Star of David was introduced into Jewish teachings and philosophy, we know it eventually became an integral part of the Jewish Kabbalah.
As Wikipedia explains:
As Wikipedia explains:
Jewish Kabbalah is a set of esoteric teachings meant to explain the relationship between the unchanging, eternal God — the mysterious Ein Sof (אֵין סוֹף, ("The Infinite") — and the mortal, finite universe (God's creation). It forms the foundation of mystical religious interpretations within Judaism.
Jewish Kabbalist originally developed their own transmission of sacred texts within the realm of Jewish tradition and often use classical Jewish scriptures to explain and demonstrate its mystical teachings. These teachings are held by followers in Judaism to define the inner meaning of both the Hebrew Bible and traditional rabbinic literature and their formerly concealed transmitted dimension, as well as to explain the significance of Jewish religious observances. One of the fundamental kabbalistic texts, the Zohar, was first published in the 13th century, and the almost universal form adhered to in modern Judaism is Lurianic Kabbalah.
Traditional practitioners believe its earliest origins pre-date world religions, forming the primordial blueprint for Creation's philosophies, religions, sciences, arts, and political systems. Historically, Kabbalah emerged from earlier forms of Jewish mysticism in 12th- to 13th-century Spain and Southern France.
And, as we know, this kabbalistic knowledge, which first emerged in Western Europe in Spain and Southern France, would be picked up by Western scholars and incorporated into Western esoteric teachings (including for these purposes the secrets of alchemy), alongside the Hermetica, by groups such as the Knights Templar and the Rosicrucians. Indeed, as I have mentioned before, Nicolas Flamel, the 14th century Parisian alchemist, supposedly discovered the secret of alchemy after reading a book by Abraham the Jew, which he obtained in Spain. This might explain why the enclave of alchemists mentioned by the C's in relation to Oak Island was based in the Pyrenees.
The Hexagram as a Scientific Symbol
Having looked at the history of the Hexagram, I would now like to turn to the science that may lie behind the symbol, which may point us towards that most interesting of concepts, the wormhole.
Let us recall what the C’s said about the loop of the cylinder, which pictorially represents the image of a wormhole:
Session 7 June 1997:
Q: Ark did some reading on the Einstein thing, the letters to Kaluza, and there did not seem to be anything that E did in the period mentioned that would make one tend to think that there was a UFT from him in that time. But, Kaluza DID have an interesting idea about a 5 dimensional cylinder UFT which Einstein thought was quite startling. Yet, it seems that Einstein somewhat delayed Kaluza's presentation. What struck me was the word 'cylinder' which reminded me of the earlier session where I asked if the Germans had developed a time machine and you said 'yes,' and that it was in Antarctica, and that 'they' were 'exploring the loop of the cylinder.' You said that the loop of the cylinder was a 4th thru 6th density profile. Could you give me some elaboration on this cylinder, the loop of the cylinder, and whether it was Kaluza who did the UFT and not Einstein?
A: Cylinder is really a double loop, is it not? And meditate if you will on the true meaning of this! [MJF: Which can be represented in the form of the wormhole, which looks like like a heavily twisted can of coke, as depicted in the illustration of a holographic quantum wormhole as provided below by Blueglazer.]
Q: Is it true that Kaluza had the theory and Einstein didn't?
A: Maybe it is that Einstein first hypothesized, and others were then commissioned for the purpose of completion in order to lead to application.
Credit to Blueglazer
Session 5 February 2000:
Q: It's really sad that Santilli is involved with such flakey people! (F) Hasn't he always been? (L) He is certainly influenced by the wrong people! And I don't think we want anything to do with him at all. (A) Now, we were talking about Kaluza Klein, and you mentioned the Germans "exploring the loop of the cylinder" in relation to time travel. I don't know what this means but I have the idea that it is related to extra dimensions, hyperspace. Now, we asked a question at some point and you said that a cylinder is really a double loop. You then suggested that we meditate on the true meaning of this sentence. Now, I don't know how to meditate, but I do know how to do math. So, I drew three pictures here: one is a real cylinder, two is a which is a kind of cylinder inside a cylinder, and three, like a torus. Laura said that it wasn't any of these, that it should only have one side like a cylinder/mobius strip - no left and no right. So, this could be option 4, something like a Klein bottle or option 5, something called a twisted torus. Is it 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5? Or 6, none of the above? Is it one of these?
A: Selection 3.
Q: 3 is the torus. (L) What is a loop of the cylinder? Yes, there is one loop and then there is another loop. One loop is probably what we call time - cyclical time.
A: Time cycle.
Q: What is the second loop?
A: Included, but not inclusive.
Q: I guess that means that it is included but is not the whole thing. It covers that, but that isn't the whole thing. What DOES it mean?
A: Yes.
Q: Wait, I asked what is the second loop. The second loop is included but not inclusive?
A: Remember, you do have cycles but that does not necessarily mean cyclical. 3-Dimensional depiction of loop, seek hexagon for more. Geometric theory provides answers for key. Look to stellar windows. Octagon, hexagon, pentagon.
Q: Are those the different levels of density?
A: No, but it relates. Geometry gets you there, algebra sets you "free."
This was followed by a further discussion of the hexagon in the session dated 4 July 2020:
A: Tetrahedron in 3D is what in 4D?
Q: (Ark) Tetrahedron in 3D is what in 4D...
A: Lethbridge.
Q: (Pierre) Coral castle.
(Joe) No, pendulums.
(Ark) The magnetic something?
(Joe) He adjusted the length of pendulums to dowse into different dimensions.
(Andromeda) He was drawing pentagrams and they were triangles in another dimension.
(Gaby) I think it was pentagons that he drew in 3rd density, and that was triangles in 4th density.
A: Yes
Q: (Ark) What is this Lethbridge? It's a book that I should look at?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) We have it. It's a short book.
(Ark) Alright, I will look and try to figure it out. Second question of a similar kind... It goes back to 24th of July 1999. I was again asking about theories of gravity and how to expand the theory of gravity because gravity is so important. Then, there was an unexpected combination of words which was, "octagonal complexigram*". That was the answer. And I have no idea... I mean, complexigram, I have an idea. There are complex numbers, right? So complex numbers, it probably has to do with...
[*This term had arisen in an answer the C’s had given to a question in the Session dated 24 July1999:
Q: (A) Okay, I was trying to figure out how to build this expanded gravity, and I made a table to assist the question. The first possibility is that one can build gravity on a square matrix. This matrix can be symmetric, can be non-symmetric, or can be a complex matrix, which I call possibilities a, b, and c. The second possibility is to build a theory of gravity on the basis of a connection which looks like a cube rather than a matrix. Here we also have three possibilities: no curvature, but torsion; no torsion but curvature; torsion and curvature. These are possibilities 1, 2, and 3. Another possibility is to use any combination of these two lines of speculation. Another possibility is none of the above, but to build gravity on the basis of an irregular cube, or an irregular square, which I call A. Another possibility is to use something that is none of the above.
A: Octagonal complexigram. Try the formula for possibility 1-c first.]
A: Double tetrahedron in 3D is hexagon in 4D.
Q: (Ark) But here it was octagonal, and not hexagonal.
The C's have thus pointed out that a double tetrahedron (which creates an octahedron when the two tetrahedrons’ bases are joined together) in 3 dimensions becomes a hexagon in 4 dimensions. A tetrahedron, or pyramid, in 3 dimensions can be represented, when viewed side on, by a triangle in 2 dimensions. The triangle is the first of the Platonic solids in geometry. The faces of a regular tetrahedron are equilateral triangles. If you then join two intersecting tetrahedrons together in 2 dimensions you will get the Star of David, otherwise known as the ‘Seal of Solomon’. In 2 dimensions this shape is depicted as a hexagon, which the C's are saying is a 4-Dimensional representation of a double tetrahedron in 3 dimensions. So, it appears that the ancient Star of David device is really a symbol, which conceals a hyperdimensional reality that can lead one to the Unified Field Theory.
This hyperdimensional reality can be seen in action more readily when the double tetrahedron is circumscribed by a circle, or in three dimensions it is enclosed within a sphere (see below and think here of planets and stars). You will note that apart from the poles, there are major intersection points at the angle of 19.5°.
This hyperdimensional reality can be seen in action more readily when the double tetrahedron is circumscribed by a circle, or in three dimensions it is enclosed within a sphere (see below and think here of planets and stars). You will note that apart from the poles, there are major intersection points at the angle of 19.5°.
This is thought by some researchers to represent the shape of the major energy out welling points within planetary spheres and stars including our Sun. Evidence to support this can be found, for example, at Kīlauea in Hawaii, which is one of the most active volcanoes on Earth and is located at 19.5°, as is the famous Red Spot on the planet Jupiter too. One of the people who has particularly promoted this hyperdimensional energy physics is Richard Hoagland, who I appreciate from responses to previous posts of mine is a researcher who is pretty much persona non grata on this Forum. However, in this context we cannot ignore what he has had to say on this subject, as the C’s themselves appeared to suggest his ideas, at least in this particular area, have credence:
Q: Everybody in the world is posting crazy, bizarre theories on the internet, and writing these elaborate web pages about their visions and their information from other 'sources,' and that the pyramid is a giant bell, or a clock that resets time, and so on and on....
A: Hoagland.
Q: Fine with Hoagland! He was on the radio the other night saying that Leedskallen moved his Coral Castle because he wanted to align it with Hoagland's proposed grid theory. That is clearly the most obvious foolishness since Hilliard told us about the moving of the Coral Castle and that it was because of some county regulatory reasons. That is the most ridiculous bunch of poppycock I have ever heard!
A: Whatever else you find true about Hoagland, just remember that genius resides adjacent to insanity!
Q: (A) What is the meaning of this remark about Hoagland?
A: Some of his stuff may be "poppycock," but some is right on the money, honey!
Q: (L) Well, what did Hoagland ever say about the pyramid? (A) He said that the way the Coral Castle was built was the same way the pyramid was built. (L) Well, we know that because Leedskallen said that himself! That's not news. Hoagland talks about this 19.5 degree latitude line and this double tetrahedron, but I don't know how that relates to something that is located at about 29 degrees of latitude such as the pyramid. That's about 10 degrees off. Has Hoagland ever opined about the pyramid itself?
A: Look it up!
It was Hoagland through his study of the geometrical alignments of the ‘Monuments on Mars’ (which we know from the C’s were built by the Atlanteans) who came to appreciate that the positioning of these structures on Mars betrayed a knowledge of an advanced hyperdimensional physics.
The C’s confirmed the correctness of Hoagland’s discovery relating to such tetrahedral hyperdimensionality in the following excerpt from the transcripts:
The C’s confirmed the correctness of Hoagland’s discovery relating to such tetrahedral hyperdimensionality in the following excerpt from the transcripts:
Q: (T) We are talking 4th density to 3rd density. Is this what Hoagland is referring to when he talks about the tetrahedral form, he has detected from the Martian structures he has been studying that he postulated...
A: Yes. This is a bridge to 4th density.
For more on this see: The Enterprise Mission (enterprisemissions.com)
Quoting Hoagland:
The Significance of the "Cydonia Message"
“Lest there be any confusion, the authors are NOT claiming there is "a tetrahedron buried inside each planet!" Rather, it is suggested that the "tetrahedral geometry" explicitly designated by "Cydonia" is revealing an equivalent higher-order mathematical topology: i.e., a vorticular "two-torus" energy flow and internal fluid dynamics, equivalent to tetrahedral mathematics. That such an internal "vorticular pattern" could be explicitly modelled by an "embedded tetrahedral topology" is mathematically well-known (Porteous, I. R., 1981). That such a "geometric short-hand" -- directing us specifically to some underlying physical manifestation of tetrahedral mathematics -- was left specifically for us at Cydonia, seems now almost inescapable . . . if not inescapably significant.
A quantitative treatment of the physics underlying this phenomenon would appear likely to advance our understanding of energy transfer inside planets considerably -- a not unexpected outcome, if this indeed is "Mankind's first successfully decoded extraterrestrial message." Additional observations suggest, however, that the significance of these predictions could extend far beyond "the simple siting of active volcanic centers on the surfaces of near-by worlds . . ."
"Cydonia Tetrahedral Model" Extended to the Giant Planets
We have already alluded to the surprising conformance of the planet Neptune to this mysterious "embedded tetrahedral model." Its newly discovered "Great Red Spot" (as imaged by the Voyager 2 spacecraft) now strikingly coincides with the "19.5-degree latitude predictions" communicated by Cydonia. It is the growing suspicion of the authors, however, that the imminent Voyager studies of Neptune, coupled with a re-analysis of those studies it conducted of Uranus, may provide vital evidence that the "Cydonia equations" are trying to tell us about more than just energy transfer . . .
Based on the evidence detailed below, it is our suggestion that these observations may relate to actual energy generation.
For many years there have been observed "energy excesses" in the overall energy balances exhibited by the four major planets of the outer solar system: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. These planets, inexplicably, all radiate significantly more energy into space than they receive from the Sun at their respective distances (Hubbard, 1980).
A quantitative treatment of the physics underlying this phenomenon would appear likely to advance our understanding of energy transfer inside planets considerably -- a not unexpected outcome, if this indeed is "Mankind's first successfully decoded extraterrestrial message." Additional observations suggest, however, that the significance of these predictions could extend far beyond "the simple siting of active volcanic centers on the surfaces of near-by worlds . . ."
"Cydonia Tetrahedral Model" Extended to the Giant Planets
We have already alluded to the surprising conformance of the planet Neptune to this mysterious "embedded tetrahedral model." Its newly discovered "Great Red Spot" (as imaged by the Voyager 2 spacecraft) now strikingly coincides with the "19.5-degree latitude predictions" communicated by Cydonia. It is the growing suspicion of the authors, however, that the imminent Voyager studies of Neptune, coupled with a re-analysis of those studies it conducted of Uranus, may provide vital evidence that the "Cydonia equations" are trying to tell us about more than just energy transfer . . .
Based on the evidence detailed below, it is our suggestion that these observations may relate to actual energy generation.
For many years there have been observed "energy excesses" in the overall energy balances exhibited by the four major planets of the outer solar system: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. These planets, inexplicably, all radiate significantly more energy into space than they receive from the Sun at their respective distances (Hubbard, 1980).
See also: Hyperdimensional Physics - 1 (bibliotecapleyades.net)
This article also included interesting conjecture by Hoagland on what James Clerk Maxwell’s original electromagnetic equations may have contained before Oliver Heaviside butchered them after Maxwell’s death and prior to their first publication.
It is obvious from Maxwell’s own writings that, even before Hathaway’s formalization, his choice of quaternions as mathematical operators for his electromagnetic theory was based on his belief that three-dimensional physical phenomena (including even perhaps the basis of human consciousness itself) are dependent upon higher dimensional realities.
For, in honour of another great mathematician of the time, multi-dimensional geometer Arthur Cayley, Maxwell wrote:
"Oh WRETCHED race of men, to space confined!
What honour can ye pay to him, whose mind
To that which lies beyond hath penetrated? The symbols he hath formed shall sound his praise,
And lead him on through unimagined ways
To conquests new, in worlds not yet created.
First, ye Determinants! In ordered row
And massive column ranged, before him go,
To form a phalanx for his safe protection.
Ye powers of the nth roots of - 1!
Around his head in ceaseless* cycles run,
As unembodied spirits of direction.
And you, ye undevelopable scrolls!
Above the host wave your emblazoned rolls,
Ruled for the record of his bright inventions.
Ye cubic surfaces! By threes and nines
Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty lines-
The seal of Solomon in three dimensions.
March on, symbolic host! With step sublime,
Up to the flaming bounds of Space and Time!
There pause, until by Dickenson depicted,
In two dimensions, we the form may trace
Of him whose soul, too large for vulgar space,
In n dimensions flourished unrestricted."
-- James Clerk Maxwell
To the Committee of the Cayley Portrait Fund -- 1887
This suggests Maxwell must have studied the Seal of Solomon very carefully and used it in his hyperdimensional model.
Confirmation that Maxwell’s "hyper-dimensional" inquiries extended far beyond "mere" physical interactions can be seen from another of his "unknown" poems ...
"My soul is an entangled knot,
Upon a liquid vortex wrought
By Intellect in the Unseen residing.
And thine doth like a convict sit,
With marlinspike untwisting it,
Only to find its knottiness abiding;
Since all the tool for its untying
In four-dimensional space are lying."
Hoagland then points out:
In another work ("The Aether," 1876), Maxwell underscored the "ultimate" significance of these inquiries ...
"Whether this vast homogeneous expanse of isotropic matter [the aether] is fitted not only to be a medium of physical Interaction between distant bodies, and to fulfil other physical functions of which, perhaps we have as yet no conception, but also as the authors of The Unseen Universe seem to suggest, to constitute the material organism of beings exercising functions of life and mind as high or higher than ours are at resent, is a question far transcending the limits of physical speculation ..."
This startling connection -- between Maxwell’s demonstrably deep interest in questions "hyperdimensional," including his direct homage to one of his scientific mentors’, Arthur Cayley’s hyperdimensional geometry (the "27 lines on the general cubic surface" problem -- see diagram, below); and our rediscovery over a century later of that same geometry ... at a place called "Cydonia" ... on Mars -- is nothing short of astonishing.
"...Ye cubic surfaces! By threes and nines, Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty lines- The seal of Solomon in three dimensions [emphasis added] .."
Which, of course, are nothing less than the geometrical and mathematical underpinnings of the infamous "circumscribed tetrahedral latitude" memorialized all over Cydonia ... 19.5 degrees, the identical, hyper-dimensional quaternion geometry whose physical effects (see below) we have now rediscovered all across the solar system ... and beyond!
In a tragedy for science (if not for society in general) whose outlines we are only now beginning to appreciate, after Maxwell’s death, two other 19th Century "mathematical physicists" -- Oliver Heaviside and William Gibbs -- "streamlined" Maxwell’s original equations down to four simple (if woefully incomplete!) expressions.
Because Heaviside openly felt the quaternions were "an abomination" -- never fully understanding the linkage between the critical scalar and vector components in Maxwell’s use of them to describe the potentials of empty space ("apples and oranges," he termed them*) -- he eliminated over 200 quaternions from Maxwell’s original theory in his attempted "simplification."
*Could this reference by Maxwell to “apples and oranges” be linked with what the C’s said here about the manifestations that occurred at Montauk, Long Island (which was a continuation of the Philadelphia Experiment) in the session dated 31 July1999:
Q: Other than people from the past and future, what other kinds of things did they materialize in the Montauk experiments?
A: Review.
Q: What kinds of things were they interested in materializing more than anything else? (A) Probably technological devices. (L) Did they materialize technology from the future?
A: This is more complex than your questions indicate.
Q: I realize this. I am struggling with this whole idea. I would just like to know what sorts of things they were most interested in materializing so that I would then have a clue as to which direction to go with my questions.
A: Not applicable.
Q: When they were doing this materializing, did they not have direct intent? Were they just experimenting to see what WOULD materialize at various settings?
A: Their knowledge brought them to a level different than your current imaginings.
Q: Well, help me out here! What do you mean?
A: No use comparing apples to oranges.
Oliver Heaviside, described by Scientific American (Sept. 1950) as "self-taught and ... never connected with any university ... had [however] a remarkable and inexplicable ability (which was possessed also by Newton and Laplace ...) to arrive at mathematical results of considerable complexity without going through any conscious process of proof ..." According to other observers, Heaviside actually felt that Maxwell’s use of quaternions and their description of the "potentials" of space was "... mystical, and should be murdered from the theory ..." which -- by drastically editing Maxwell’s original work after the latter’s untimely death (from cancer), excising the scalar component of the quaternions and eliminating the hyperspatial characteristics of the directional (vector) components -- Oliver Heaviside effectively accomplished singlehanded.
They are, in fact...,
"Heaviside’s equations!"
Lest anyone doubt this is the case, they merely have to read a highly revealing paper on the subject by another renowned British mathematical physicist of this century, Sir Edmund Whittaker, titled simply "Oliver Heaviside" (Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, Vol. 20, 1928-29, p.202); or, another overview of Heaviside by Paul J. Nahin, "Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude" (IEEE Press, New York, 1988, p.9, note 3.).
The end result was that physics lost its promising theoretical beginnings to becoming truly "hyperdimensional" physics ... over a century ago ... and all that that implies.
And no doubt this was deliberately engineered by the PTB (powers that be) of that period to deprive scientists from learning of Maxwell’s real model, which appears to have been kept under lock and key ever since.
As a last note on Hoagland’s discovery concerning the tetrahedron model, the C’s made some additional comments on the matter in the session dated September 25, 1999:
They are, in fact...,
"Heaviside’s equations!"
Lest anyone doubt this is the case, they merely have to read a highly revealing paper on the subject by another renowned British mathematical physicist of this century, Sir Edmund Whittaker, titled simply "Oliver Heaviside" (Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, Vol. 20, 1928-29, p.202); or, another overview of Heaviside by Paul J. Nahin, "Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude" (IEEE Press, New York, 1988, p.9, note 3.).
The end result was that physics lost its promising theoretical beginnings to becoming truly "hyperdimensional" physics ... over a century ago ... and all that that implies.
And no doubt this was deliberately engineered by the PTB (powers that be) of that period to deprive scientists from learning of Maxwell’s real model, which appears to have been kept under lock and key ever since.
As a last note on Hoagland’s discovery concerning the tetrahedron model, the C’s made some additional comments on the matter in the session dated September 25, 1999:
A: Yes. All Hoagland has done is highlight a point at which magnetic lines converge using the tetrahedron model.
Q: If they converge at that point...
A: But the question is how does the tetrahedron model relate to trans-dimensional space?
Q: How does the tetrahedron model relate to trans-dimensional space?
A: A key which unlocks the door.
Q: Back to the tetrahedron. How is it a key to trans-dimensional space? Does one activate it in some way? Do you place machinery of some sort at these points?
A: No. Magnetism.
Q: Are you supposed to generate magnetism, or is it natural magnetism?
A: Natural.
Q: Are you supposed to do anything to it or with it?
A: Supposed???
Q: Is it useful to do something with it?
A: Can be.
Q: In what sense?
A: Travelling between dimensions. [MJF: Keep this point in mind for later]
Q: Is anybody at the present time utilizing it in this way?
A: Not terran STS 3rd density.
Q: That implies that 4th density STS IS doing this. Could one construct a scale model of a tetrahedron in a sphere, magnetize it, and open portals?
A: Yes.
Q: Would it require a lot of electrical current?
A: Yes.
Q: Is there anyway to travel between dimensions, in space time, or whatever, utilizing very little power, as such?
A: Off the point we told you before that all spheres of cosmic nature are windows.
Continued in Part 2
