No, I haven't seen this video. Thank you for drawing it to my attention. The idea of it being a maser is something which both Christopher Dunn and Joseph Farrell champion as well. As with Stonehenge, what we see today in the Great Pyramid is just a mere skeleton with all the machinery that made it work having been withdrawn long ago (unless, of course, some of it is stored within the 'great void' that was discovered just a few years ago). It is worth noting that Sir Isaac Newton, the father of the Theory of Gravity, and Nikola Tesla studied the Great Pyramid very closely. They must have surmised things about it that were not readily apparent to others.
Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians
- Thread starter MJF
- Start date
Jimmy Ssaz
Jedi
What is the importance of those who have secrets inside them from before the fall? Is it about a certain ancestral lineage of Orion where one of the characteristics is the split chin?
I recently saw a series on Netflix called "the gift" (beware spoilers) it is about an ancestral lineage of Isis and her husband Osiris have a girl who would be the reincarnation of Horus who holds the fate of humanity in her hands. There are memories of past lives such as Jesus and Mary Magdalene, Adam and Eve, Isis and Osiris...also an elite type organization appears.
Sorry but I am not sure of the point you are making. Perhaps something has been lost in translation.
The Council of Nine
As to this role of overseeing, the C’s subsequently spoke of overseer zones in the session dated 24 September 1995:
There are overseer zones in 5th and 6th densities. Approximately one half is
STO and one half is STS. Together, along with many other colonies,
located elsewhere, this is called, in translation, Orion Federation.
Questioner: How were you able to make the transition from Venus? Did you have to change your dimension to walk upon the Earth?
Ra: I am Ra. You will remember the exercise of the wind. The dissolution into nothingness* is the dissolution into unity, for there is no nothingness. From the sixth dimension, we are capable of manipulating, by thought, the intelligent infinity present in each particle of light [MJF: units of consciousness] or distorted light so that we were able to clothe ourselves in a replica visible in the third density of our mind/body/spirit complexes in the sixth density. We were allowed this experiment by the Council which guards this planet.
Questioner: Where is this Council located?
Ra: I am Ra. This Council is located in the octave, or eighth dimension, of the planet Saturn, taking its place in an area which you understand in third-dimension terms as the rings.
* Curiously, in the original Star Trek TV series, there was an episode called ‘Who Mourns for Adonais’(see: Who Mourns for Adonais? - Wikipedia), where the Greek god Apollo is seen at the end of the story to dissolve into thin air, or spread himself on the wind, in order to join his fellow gods – could this scene have been an example of an inspiration from Thor’s Pantheum I wonder?
On another occasion, the Ra source expounded further on the Zendar Council:
"The members of the Council are representatives from the Confederation and from those vibratory levels of your inner planes bearing responsibility for your third density. The names are not important because there are no names. Your mind/body/spirit complexes request names and so, in many cases, the vibratory sound complexes which are consonant with the vibratory distortions of each entity are used. However, the name concept is not part of the Council. If names are requested, we will attempt them. However, not all have chosen names.
In number, the Council that sits in constant session, though varying in its members of balancing, which takes place, what you would call irregularly, is nine. That is the Session Council. To back up this Council, there are twenty-four entities which offer their services as requested. These entities faithfully watch and have been called Guardians."
A: Quorum mostly alien; illuminati mostly human. Q: (L) How is the Quorum important in regard to the Earth changes?
A: Watchers [MJF: did a group of these watchers go renegade on Mt. Hermon in Lebanon?].
Q: (L) Why is it important to have watchers?
A: Keep track of prophecies.
The Q in Star Trek
Q: (T) Is there any significance to the ID4 movie?
A: Sure.
Q: (L) What was the primary intention of the makers of this movie? The primary message that they attempted to convey?
A: Infuse thinking patterns with [planchette swirled a few times here] concept of aliens.
Q: (L) They intended to infuse thinking patterns with concept of aliens... was there any particular slant on aliens, per se, that was seen as desirable in the making of this movie?
A: Slant?
Q: (L) Slant, in other words, did they wish to present them inaccurately to confuse people, to present them as something to be feared and fought against, or to make them appear so completely erroneous, so that when actual aliens do appear, that they will not be perceived as negative?
A: Infuse.
Q: (L) Infuse. Just the concept, the concept of aliens in general. OK...
A: Part of a larger project.
Q: (L) And what is this project?
A: Called "Project Awaken."
Q: (L) And who is behind, or in charge of, this project?
A: Many.
Q: (L) Who are the primary group, groups or individuals? I'm sure you're not going to give us individuals, but just the grouping.
A: Thor's Pantheum.
Q: (L) And what is Thor's Pantheum?
A: Sub-select trainees for transfer of enlightenment frequency graduation.
Q: (L) What is enlightenment frequency graduation?
A: Think!
Q: (L) Enlightenment frequency graduation... so, sub-select trainees...
A: Self-explanatory.
Q: (L) Well, is this group STS or STO?
A: Both.
Q: (L) OK... (T) Are they working at cross purposes?
A: No.
Q: (T) They're working together? Bipartisan?
A: No.
Q: (J) Are they aware of each other? Working on this?
A: Yes.
Q: (J) Are they screwing each other up? (L) No, that's going in the wrong direction...
A: There is more to all of this than you could dream.
Q: (T) There's more to all of this...were you referring to... Who are they? Thor's Pantheum. And they're sub select trainees...That's the group behind this movie; OK...
A: An army of Aryan psychic projectors.
Q: (T) Well, that explains a lot more than Thor's Pantheum of sub-select trainees! An army of psychic projectors. (L) And what do they project?
A: Themselves... Right into one's head.
Q: (T) Into one's head... this is better than 'Must See TV!' (L) Project right into one's head... is anybody subject to this projecting?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And, when they project themselves right into someone's head, what does that someone perceive?
A: Inspiration.
Q: (L) Inspiration to what, or to do what?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Yes? To do what, to do something?
A: And...
Q: (L) To do something, and to understand or perceive something, is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (J) To believe something? (L) Yes. So, how many are in this army?
A: 1.6 million.
Q: (L) When they're doing this projecting into someone's head, where are they projecting from?
A: Mostly subterranean. [MJF: But not all judging by what the C’s told Laura in the session dated 1 August 2001:
Q: Let me ask you this: if some of these STS programming signals that are going out, I mean, I'm assuming some of them come from 3rd density, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: Do they actually have, like, some place on the planet where these guys sit around and read science fiction books and get these really crazy theories and stories that they assemble with some sort of fiendish glee, and then convert them via computer into the programming signal code that gets beamed out into people's heads, while the guys who are making up all the space brothers scenarios in some secret military base or whatever, just fall down on the floor laughing at what they have just done? That people will believe anything. Is this possibly something that is going on? A: Yes.]
Q: (L) Subterranean, so these are the people of the tunnels, the underground bases and all that sort of thing. Are they 3rd or 4th density beings?
A: Both.
Q: (T) Let me back up to a question here. If they can do all this projecting on their own, what was the point of the movie?
A: No, you misunderstand... This is an intense activity, directed towards influencing the high level creative forces.
Q: (L) And was this subliminal activity with the movie designed to create an opening for this further...
A: Not for you, but for others.
Q: (L) Why? Do you mean me, personally, or us as a group? (T) Well the movie didn't affect me.
A: Group.
Q: (L) What made us immune?
A: You already have the knowledge.
Q: (T) The movie wasn't meant for us; we already know. The movie was meant for all of those who don't understand.
A: Say hello to Gene Roddenberry.
Q: (L) Is Gene Roddenberry present?
A: No.
Q: (L) In other words, say hello to him because he was doing that sort of thing a long time ago?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is Gene Roddenberry one of these people from Thor's Pantheon...
A: No.
Q: (L) Why did you bring up Gene Roddenberry? (J) Because he was doing it in Star Trek?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) He was doing a whole different thing with Star Trek... (L) Well, let’s not get too far off track...
A: It's not the exact "Slant," it's "the concept, stupid."
[…]
Q: (J) We knew that!! (T) I was just teasing. Mirth!! Mirth! (L) Hold everything. When you say influencing high level creative forces, do you mean as in gathering, what would you call it, gravity waves...?
A: No.
Q: (L) What are these high-level creative forces that are needing to be influenced, or desirable of being influenced?
A: Those in the creative arts.
Q: (L) So in other words, I see, this group is using their projecting ability to influence those in the creative arts to do creative things that will therefore influence the people on the planet. Is that it?
A: Yes.
See: The Council of Nine (bibliotecapleyades.net)
The Nine’s disciples included:multi-millionaire businessmen (many hiding behind pseudonyms and including members of Canada’s richest family, the Bronfmans) and
Another key player in Lab Nine was Dr James J Hurtak, who was appointed Puharich’s second-in-command by The Nine. In fact, Hurtak had been independently channelling The Nine since 1973.
In this extraordinary book the true identity of the Nine - and of Tom - was finally revealed.
But even with such impressive contacts, all was not well with Puharich.
See also Laura’s very useful commentary on the Star Gate Conspiracy at: Book Review: The Stargate Conspiracy (cassiopaea.org)
In that article, Laura stated:
“Q: (L) Next question: I would like to know what is the "Council of Nine," as I have read about in several books. Now, there was an ancient council of nine, and then there is the one talked about by Phyllis Schlemmer Are there any references on the council of nine that you can give us?
A: Partial deception.
Q: Partial deception in the ancient references, or the modern ones?
A: Take ancient references and interpret modern accounts according to current events profile.!”
One of the chief concepts of The Nine is that the Earth was an "experiment in free will" that went wrong and if we just hold our mouth right, they will come in and fix things up for us as they have over and over again. This is, essentially, the idea that is being presented by dozens, hundreds of channelled sources.
The Ennead
Session dated 4 October 1997:
Q: I also noticed that the word 'Osiris' could also be slightly modified to say 'of Sirius.' Comment, please.
A: Sirius was regarded highly in your "past."
Q: What was the foundation of this regard for Sirius?
A: "From whence cometh, is seen that which knows no limitation."
Q: Could you elaborate on that?
A: Could but will not.
Q: Why?
A: Because you can!
Q: (L) Okay, going back to the pyramid. In the Pyramid Texts, when they talk about the ‘Boat of Millions of Years,’ what are they talking about?
A: Time machine.
And, of course, a time machine knows no limitation.
Q: (L) I am curious about what I call the "Scottish Question." Why is it that every time I start a paper trail on any issue of conspiracy, there always seems to be a link to Scotland and Scots?
A: "Celtic," what does it mean?
Q: (L) Well, the word "kilt" comes from "Celtic," but no one seems to know where they originated... they just sort of appeared on the landscape, so to speak.
A: Exactly!
Q: (L) Are you going to tell us?
A: No, not just as of yet.
Q: (L) Well, the word "kilt" comes from "Celtic," but no one seems to know where they originated... they just sort of appeared on the landscape, so to speak.
A: Exactly!
Q: (L) Are you going to tell us?
A: No, not just as of yet.
Q: (L) So, there is some interesting connection! (RC) Does it mean "warrior race?"
A: If you prefer! We have close affiliation with the "Northern Peoples." Why? Because we were in regular, direct contact with them on Kantek, before they were "lifted" to Earth by Orion STS.
So, who were the Nine Emperor Gods?
Victorian mythologist Gerald Massey (1828-1907) identified the hippo-croc sky figure of ancient Egypt as a primeval genitrix, a form of Tawaret as mother of Seth (the Greek Typhon), controlling both the turning of the heavens and the passage of time. He mentions this primordial deity several times in his two-volume work The Book of Beginnings , calling her the “goddess of the seven stars.”
As I then pointed out:
But could there be another connection with Ursa Major, one that relates directly to the quest for the Grail?
Session 26 July 1997:
Q: What is the meaning of 'The Widow's Son?' The implication?
A: Stalks path of wisdom incarnate.
Q: Why is this described as a Widow's son? This was the appellation of Perceval...
A: Perceval was knighted in the court of seven.
Q: The court of seven what?
A: Swords points signify crystal transmitter of truth beholden.
A: Scene of martyrdom. [MJF: Curiously some Daoist traditions link the Nine Emperor Gods to the 9 martyrs of the Qin dynasty – could there be some distant connection here to what the C’s were describing?]
Q: (L) They also talk about the ‘Seven Sages.’ You once said that Perceval was ‘knighted in the Court of Seven and that the sword’s points signify ‘crystal transmitter of truth beholden.’ Do these seven sages relate to this ‘Court of Seven’ that you mentioned?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When you said ‘swords points signify crystal transmitter of truth beholden,’ could you elaborate on that remark?
A: Has celestial meaning.
The Lords of the Night
Tezcatlipoca ("Smoking Mirror")
Piltzintecuhtli ("Prince Lord")
Centeotl ("Maize God")
Mictlantecuhtli ("Underworld Lord")
Chalchiuhtlicue ("Jade Is Her Skirt")
Tlazolteotl ("Filth God[dess]")
Tepeyollotl ("Mountain Heart")
Tlaloc ("Rain God")
The Nine Unknown Men of Ashoka
Nine Etruscan Deities – Novensiles
Zeus and ‘Council of Nine’
The Nine Muses of the Greek Mythology
For more see: Significance Of The 'Divine Nine' In Ancient Cultures - Look4ward
Continued in Part 2
In my recent article ‘The Hexagon and the Star of David’, I looked at the Council of Zendar based on the planet Saturn within its rings, which the C’s said was a sixth level density council which spans both physical and ethereal realms and oversees dramatic development points at various civilisational sectors in lower density levels. Quoting from that article:
As to this role of overseeing, the C’s subsequently spoke of overseer zones in the session dated 24 September 1995:
There are overseer zones in 5th and 6th densities. Approximately one half is
STO and one half is STS. Together, along with many other colonies,
located elsewhere, this is called, in translation, Orion Federation.
The reference to a council of oversight based on Saturn also seemed to tie in with comments made by Ra in the 'Law of One’ channellings:
Questioner: How were you able to make the transition from Venus? Did you have to change your dimension to walk upon the Earth?
Ra: I am Ra. You will remember the exercise of the wind. The dissolution into nothingness* is the dissolution into unity, for there is no nothingness. From the sixth dimension, we are capable of manipulating, by thought, the intelligent infinity present in each particle of light [MJF: units of consciousness] or distorted light so that we were able to clothe ourselves in a replica visible in the third density of our mind/body/spirit complexes in the sixth density. We were allowed this experiment by the Council which guards this planet.
Questioner: Where is this Council located?
Ra: I am Ra. This Council is located in the octave, or eighth dimension, of the planet Saturn, taking its place in an area which you understand in third-dimension terms as the rings.
* Curiously, in the original Star Trek TV series, there was an episode called ‘Who Mourns for Adonais’(see: Who Mourns for Adonais? - Wikipedia), where the Greek god Apollo is seen at the end of the story to dissolve into thin air, or spread himself on the wind, in order to join his fellow gods – could this scene have been an example of an inspiration from Thor’s Pantheum I wonder?
On another occasion, the Ra source expounded further on the Zendar Council:
"The members of the Council are representatives from the Confederation and from those vibratory levels of your inner planes bearing responsibility for your third density. The names are not important because there are no names. Your mind/body/spirit complexes request names and so, in many cases, the vibratory sound complexes which are consonant with the vibratory distortions of each entity are used. However, the name concept is not part of the Council. If names are requested, we will attempt them. However, not all have chosen names.
In number, the Council that sits in constant session, though varying in its members of balancing, which takes place, what you would call irregularly, is nine. That is the Session Council. To back up this Council, there are twenty-four entities which offer their services as requested. These entities faithfully watch and have been called Guardians."
Hence, it is important to bear in mind here for later purposes that Ra describes the Zendar Council, when in session, as sometimes comprising (on an irregular basis though) nine higher density beings.
I also conjectured whether the Zendar Council could be linked directly to the body the C’s have referred to in the transcripts as the Quorum, which the C’s have said is mainly comprised of aliens*, and whether this Council could have been the strange group of patriarchal type beings that Laura once saw in a dream, who seemed to give her a mission. She viewed them as an astral school of learning.
*Q: (L) On a number of occasions we talked about the quorum and the Illuminati. They both seem to be the highest levels of secret organizations. What is their relationship to each other?I also conjectured whether the Zendar Council could be linked directly to the body the C’s have referred to in the transcripts as the Quorum, which the C’s have said is mainly comprised of aliens*, and whether this Council could have been the strange group of patriarchal type beings that Laura once saw in a dream, who seemed to give her a mission. She viewed them as an astral school of learning.
A: Quorum mostly alien; illuminati mostly human. Q: (L) How is the Quorum important in regard to the Earth changes?
A: Watchers [MJF: did a group of these watchers go renegade on Mt. Hermon in Lebanon?].
Q: (L) Why is it important to have watchers?
A: Keep track of prophecies.
Bearing in mind what Ra said about his sixth density mind/body/spirit complexes being allowed by the Council to conduct an experiment** on Earth, and the fact that Ra was also the name of an ancient god of Egypt, could we see in our history examples of the Council taking a hand in human affairs and human civilisational development? I think the answer to that question is yes and that involvement may be seen in a group of nine deities that I will refer to hereafter as the Council of Nine or the Ennead.
**Recall that the C’s once said that the PTB or Illuminati's deepest secret was that they knew humankind were an experiment.
The Q in Star Trek
Before looking more closely at the Council of Nine, I would like to consider whether Gene Roddenberry, the creator of Star Trek (and a Rosicrucian through his membership of AMORC), through his involvement in the channelling sessions with the ‘the Nine’ at the Stanford Institute (see more on this later), may have become aware of the Council of Zendar.
For those not familiar with the world of Star Trek, the Q are a collective of god-like, non-corporeal beings with superpowers who live in a timeless continuum. They were introduced in the very first episode of Star Trek the Next Generation, which was the first follow-up series to the original Star Trek TV series of the 1960’s. In the first episode of the new series, Encounter at Farpoint, the star ship Enterprise’s crew first meet the character of Q when he poses as a Grand Inquisitor — who declares that humanity is being put on trial, then decides that their actions in their upcoming mission will be used to judge their worthiness and determine their fate as a race. This makes me wonder whether the Atlanteans, a spacefaring civilisation, faced a similar kind of judgment, which they failed, thus leading to the Deluge that annihilated them.
The character of Q, played by the actor John de Lancie, would be a recurring one throughout the series (and later spin-off Star Trek shows as well), including the double episode story which concluded the series, where once again the crew (but particularly Captain, Jean Luc Picard) would be set a final make or break test, with humanity’s very creation and existence at stake. You have to wonder whether Roddenberry worked the concept of sixth density beings existing in a timeless continuum and the Council of Zendar’s role in overseeing mankind’s development into Star Trek the Next Generation by means of the Q, as a result of information he may have learned of through his participation in the Nine channellings. He had already introduced the concepts of a United Federation of Planets, faster than light travel and transdimensional re-molecularisation by means of a transporter device in the original Star Trek TV series, all things the C’s have since confirmed do exist, plus the all-important and overriding ‘Prime Directive’ relating to non-interference in the affairs of more primitive societies. In Star Trek the Next Generation, Roddenberry would even have Q introduce humanity to its deadliest foe yet, the Borg, who were a multispecies cyber-genetic collective of drones controlled as a hive mind by a Borg Queen, who to me seem eerily similar to the Greys from Zeta Reticuli who, as 4th density soulless cyber-genetic beings, are controlled by the STS Orions.
As an aside, the C’s have spoken about battles at higher densities manifesting as extreme weather conditions at third density. In an episode of Star Trek Voyager that I recently watched again, the plot involved a civil war in the Q continuum, which curiously manifested itself as supernovae explosions in normal space time. In this particular episode Q, still played by John de Lancie, had become something of comic relief, as the whole episode was played for laughs. However, it left me wondering whether this idea of supernovae resulting from battles at higher dimensional levels could have been something inspired by Thor’s Pantheum. If so, and such battles really do affect our own reality, it makes me think of the supernova explosion we are supposed to be witnessing soon that the C’s have spoken about on several occasions. Might it be the result of an intense battle at 6th density between STO and STO forces?
One might also wonder if Roddenberry himself was influenced by Thor’s Pantheum of subterranean Aryan psychic projectors, as others in the creative field have been according to the C’s:
Session 21 September 1996:For those not familiar with the world of Star Trek, the Q are a collective of god-like, non-corporeal beings with superpowers who live in a timeless continuum. They were introduced in the very first episode of Star Trek the Next Generation, which was the first follow-up series to the original Star Trek TV series of the 1960’s. In the first episode of the new series, Encounter at Farpoint, the star ship Enterprise’s crew first meet the character of Q when he poses as a Grand Inquisitor — who declares that humanity is being put on trial, then decides that their actions in their upcoming mission will be used to judge their worthiness and determine their fate as a race. This makes me wonder whether the Atlanteans, a spacefaring civilisation, faced a similar kind of judgment, which they failed, thus leading to the Deluge that annihilated them.
The character of Q, played by the actor John de Lancie, would be a recurring one throughout the series (and later spin-off Star Trek shows as well), including the double episode story which concluded the series, where once again the crew (but particularly Captain, Jean Luc Picard) would be set a final make or break test, with humanity’s very creation and existence at stake. You have to wonder whether Roddenberry worked the concept of sixth density beings existing in a timeless continuum and the Council of Zendar’s role in overseeing mankind’s development into Star Trek the Next Generation by means of the Q, as a result of information he may have learned of through his participation in the Nine channellings. He had already introduced the concepts of a United Federation of Planets, faster than light travel and transdimensional re-molecularisation by means of a transporter device in the original Star Trek TV series, all things the C’s have since confirmed do exist, plus the all-important and overriding ‘Prime Directive’ relating to non-interference in the affairs of more primitive societies. In Star Trek the Next Generation, Roddenberry would even have Q introduce humanity to its deadliest foe yet, the Borg, who were a multispecies cyber-genetic collective of drones controlled as a hive mind by a Borg Queen, who to me seem eerily similar to the Greys from Zeta Reticuli who, as 4th density soulless cyber-genetic beings, are controlled by the STS Orions.
As an aside, the C’s have spoken about battles at higher densities manifesting as extreme weather conditions at third density. In an episode of Star Trek Voyager that I recently watched again, the plot involved a civil war in the Q continuum, which curiously manifested itself as supernovae explosions in normal space time. In this particular episode Q, still played by John de Lancie, had become something of comic relief, as the whole episode was played for laughs. However, it left me wondering whether this idea of supernovae resulting from battles at higher dimensional levels could have been something inspired by Thor’s Pantheum. If so, and such battles really do affect our own reality, it makes me think of the supernova explosion we are supposed to be witnessing soon that the C’s have spoken about on several occasions. Might it be the result of an intense battle at 6th density between STO and STO forces?
One might also wonder if Roddenberry himself was influenced by Thor’s Pantheum of subterranean Aryan psychic projectors, as others in the creative field have been according to the C’s:
Q: (T) Is there any significance to the ID4 movie?
A: Sure.
Q: (L) What was the primary intention of the makers of this movie? The primary message that they attempted to convey?
A: Infuse thinking patterns with [planchette swirled a few times here] concept of aliens.
Q: (L) They intended to infuse thinking patterns with concept of aliens... was there any particular slant on aliens, per se, that was seen as desirable in the making of this movie?
A: Slant?
Q: (L) Slant, in other words, did they wish to present them inaccurately to confuse people, to present them as something to be feared and fought against, or to make them appear so completely erroneous, so that when actual aliens do appear, that they will not be perceived as negative?
A: Infuse.
Q: (L) Infuse. Just the concept, the concept of aliens in general. OK...
A: Part of a larger project.
Q: (L) And what is this project?
A: Called "Project Awaken."
Q: (L) And who is behind, or in charge of, this project?
A: Many.
Q: (L) Who are the primary group, groups or individuals? I'm sure you're not going to give us individuals, but just the grouping.
A: Thor's Pantheum.
Q: (L) And what is Thor's Pantheum?
A: Sub-select trainees for transfer of enlightenment frequency graduation.
Q: (L) What is enlightenment frequency graduation?
A: Think!
Q: (L) Enlightenment frequency graduation... so, sub-select trainees...
A: Self-explanatory.
Q: (L) Well, is this group STS or STO?
A: Both.
Q: (L) OK... (T) Are they working at cross purposes?
A: No.
Q: (T) They're working together? Bipartisan?
A: No.
Q: (J) Are they aware of each other? Working on this?
A: Yes.
Q: (J) Are they screwing each other up? (L) No, that's going in the wrong direction...
A: There is more to all of this than you could dream.
Q: (T) There's more to all of this...were you referring to... Who are they? Thor's Pantheum. And they're sub select trainees...That's the group behind this movie; OK...
A: An army of Aryan psychic projectors.
Q: (T) Well, that explains a lot more than Thor's Pantheum of sub-select trainees! An army of psychic projectors. (L) And what do they project?
A: Themselves... Right into one's head.
Q: (T) Into one's head... this is better than 'Must See TV!' (L) Project right into one's head... is anybody subject to this projecting?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And, when they project themselves right into someone's head, what does that someone perceive?
A: Inspiration.
Q: (L) Inspiration to what, or to do what?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Yes? To do what, to do something?
A: And...
Q: (L) To do something, and to understand or perceive something, is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (J) To believe something? (L) Yes. So, how many are in this army?
A: 1.6 million.
Q: (L) When they're doing this projecting into someone's head, where are they projecting from?
A: Mostly subterranean. [MJF: But not all judging by what the C’s told Laura in the session dated 1 August 2001:
Q: Let me ask you this: if some of these STS programming signals that are going out, I mean, I'm assuming some of them come from 3rd density, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: Do they actually have, like, some place on the planet where these guys sit around and read science fiction books and get these really crazy theories and stories that they assemble with some sort of fiendish glee, and then convert them via computer into the programming signal code that gets beamed out into people's heads, while the guys who are making up all the space brothers scenarios in some secret military base or whatever, just fall down on the floor laughing at what they have just done? That people will believe anything. Is this possibly something that is going on? A: Yes.]
Q: (L) Subterranean, so these are the people of the tunnels, the underground bases and all that sort of thing. Are they 3rd or 4th density beings?
A: Both.
Q: (T) Let me back up to a question here. If they can do all this projecting on their own, what was the point of the movie?
A: No, you misunderstand... This is an intense activity, directed towards influencing the high level creative forces.
This today would no doubt include science fiction writers, movie and television producers, directors and script writers - think here of George Lucas, Steven Spielberg and Ridley Scott to name but a few who may have been inspired by Thor’s Pantheum to create their influential movie franchises: Star Wars, Indiana Jones and Alien respectively. However, it would seem this was not the case with Roddenberry and Star Trek:
Q: (L) And was this subliminal activity with the movie designed to create an opening for this further...
A: Not for you, but for others.
Q: (L) Why? Do you mean me, personally, or us as a group? (T) Well the movie didn't affect me.
A: Group.
Q: (L) What made us immune?
A: You already have the knowledge.
Q: (T) The movie wasn't meant for us; we already know. The movie was meant for all of those who don't understand.
A: Say hello to Gene Roddenberry.
Q: (L) Is Gene Roddenberry present?
A: No.
Q: (L) In other words, say hello to him because he was doing that sort of thing a long time ago?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is Gene Roddenberry one of these people from Thor's Pantheon...
A: No.
Q: (L) Why did you bring up Gene Roddenberry? (J) Because he was doing it in Star Trek?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) He was doing a whole different thing with Star Trek... (L) Well, let’s not get too far off track...
A: It's not the exact "Slant," it's "the concept, stupid."
[…]
Q: (J) We knew that!! (T) I was just teasing. Mirth!! Mirth! (L) Hold everything. When you say influencing high level creative forces, do you mean as in gathering, what would you call it, gravity waves...?
A: No.
Q: (L) What are these high-level creative forces that are needing to be influenced, or desirable of being influenced?
A: Those in the creative arts.
Q: (L) So in other words, I see, this group is using their projecting ability to influence those in the creative arts to do creative things that will therefore influence the people on the planet. Is that it?
A: Yes.
I would suggest in Gene Roddenberry’s case this was not necessary as he already had the benefit of ‘The Nine’ Channellings to draw upon instead; although that does not rule out the possibility that some of the Star Trek screenplay writers who came up with the story lines and plots could have been influenced by Thor’s Pantheum. Who can tell?
The Nine Channellings
We have, of course, looked at the CIA backed project that established The Nine channellings before on this thread. For a quick recapitulation, I would quote from an article on The Nine, which is largely based on The Stargate Conspiracy by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince, a book which looked into the sinister origins of The Nine.
See: The Council of Nine (bibliotecapleyades.net)
The project began in 1948 in a private research laboratory in Glen Cove, Maine, called the Round Table Foundation, run by a medical doctor named Andrija Puharich (also known as Henry K Puharich) who worked for the CIA. Recent research has revealed Puharich to have a distinctly sinister side. As an Army doctor in the 1950s, he was deeply involved with the CIA’s notorious MKULTRA mind control project. Together with the infamous Dr Sidney Gottlieb, Puharich experimented with a variety of techniques to change or induce actual thought processes. even to creating the impression of voices in the head. These techniques included the use of drugs, hypnosis and beaming radio signals directly into the subject’s brain.
[MJF: From this description, it looks as though Puharich may have been involved in perfecting for the CIA the Greenbauming brainwashing techniques originally used by the Gestapo, as discussed with the C’s. Moreover, the C’s have confirmed that the CIA and other nefarious groups have the capability of creating the impression of voices in a person’s head – see the excerpt from the session dated 1 August 2001 shown above.]
The project was intended to research the paranormal. Among the noted psychics studied at the Foundation were the famous Irish medium Eileen Garrett and the Dutch clairvoyant Peter Hurkos (Pieter van de Hirk). Prominent members included the influential philosopher and inventor Arthur M Young and the socialite Alice Bouverie (née Astor [MJF: N.B. the Astors are believed to be a high-ranking Illuminati family. Moreover, the original Round Table was an elitist organisation set up by the 19th century British tycoon and empire builder Cecil Rhodes). The Foundation itself is now known to have been largely funded by the Pentagon as a front for its medical and parapsychological research.
In December 1952, Puharich brought into his laboratory an Indian mystic named Dr D G Vinod, who began to channel The Nine or ’the Nine Principles’. In the months before Vinod returned to India, a group met regularly to hear The Nine’s channelled wisdom. Never known for their modesty, The Nine proclaimed themselves to be God, stating "God is nobody else than we together, the Nine Principles of God."
[MJF: From this description, it looks as though Puharich may have been involved in perfecting for the CIA the Greenbauming brainwashing techniques originally used by the Gestapo, as discussed with the C’s. Moreover, the C’s have confirmed that the CIA and other nefarious groups have the capability of creating the impression of voices in a person’s head – see the excerpt from the session dated 1 August 2001 shown above.]
The project was intended to research the paranormal. Among the noted psychics studied at the Foundation were the famous Irish medium Eileen Garrett and the Dutch clairvoyant Peter Hurkos (Pieter van de Hirk). Prominent members included the influential philosopher and inventor Arthur M Young and the socialite Alice Bouverie (née Astor [MJF: N.B. the Astors are believed to be a high-ranking Illuminati family. Moreover, the original Round Table was an elitist organisation set up by the 19th century British tycoon and empire builder Cecil Rhodes). The Foundation itself is now known to have been largely funded by the Pentagon as a front for its medical and parapsychological research.
In December 1952, Puharich brought into his laboratory an Indian mystic named Dr D G Vinod, who began to channel The Nine or ’the Nine Principles’. In the months before Vinod returned to India, a group met regularly to hear The Nine’s channelled wisdom. Never known for their modesty, The Nine proclaimed themselves to be God, stating "God is nobody else than we together, the Nine Principles of God."
The Nine’s disciples included:multi-millionaire businessmen (many hiding behind pseudonyms and including members of Canada’s richest family, the Bronfmans) and
- European nobility
- scientists from the Stanford Research Institute
- at least one prominent political figure who was a personal friend of President Gerald Ford
We also know that Lyall Watson (then the darling of the alternative scene because of his seminal 1973 book Supernature) was involved, as was the influential counter-culture guru Ira Einhorn [MJF: who would later be convicted of murder] - and Gene Roddenberry, creator of Star Trek.
Roddenberry was part of that circle in 1974 and 1975, and even produced the screenplay for a movie about The Nine. How much he was influenced by them is unknown, although it is said that some of their concepts found their way into the early Star Trek movies, and The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine TV series (there was even a character called ‘Vinod’ in one Deep Space Nine episode). [MJF: I wonder if the name ‘Deep Space Nine’ may have even be a pun on ‘The Nine’ given that much of the story arc of that long series involved a strange group of non-corporeal superbeings called ‘the prophets’, whose semi-divine influence weaved through so many of the story lines.]
After disbanding the Round Table Foundation in 1958, Puharich had to find other channels. He subsequently joined up with aristocratic former racing driver Sir John Whitmore and Florida-based psychic and healer Phyllis Schlemmer. Schlemmer was appointed the authorised spokesperson for the entity – now known simply as ’Tom’ - who represented The Nine. Puharich, Whitmore and Schlemmer then set up Lab Nine at Puharich’s estate in Ossining, New York.
Roddenberry was part of that circle in 1974 and 1975, and even produced the screenplay for a movie about The Nine. How much he was influenced by them is unknown, although it is said that some of their concepts found their way into the early Star Trek movies, and The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine TV series (there was even a character called ‘Vinod’ in one Deep Space Nine episode). [MJF: I wonder if the name ‘Deep Space Nine’ may have even be a pun on ‘The Nine’ given that much of the story arc of that long series involved a strange group of non-corporeal superbeings called ‘the prophets’, whose semi-divine influence weaved through so many of the story lines.]
After disbanding the Round Table Foundation in 1958, Puharich had to find other channels. He subsequently joined up with aristocratic former racing driver Sir John Whitmore and Florida-based psychic and healer Phyllis Schlemmer. Schlemmer was appointed the authorised spokesperson for the entity – now known simply as ’Tom’ - who represented The Nine. Puharich, Whitmore and Schlemmer then set up Lab Nine at Puharich’s estate in Ossining, New York.
Another key player in Lab Nine was Dr James J Hurtak, who was appointed Puharich’s second-in-command by The Nine. In fact, Hurtak had been independently channelling The Nine since 1973.
Puharich and Whitmore commissioned British writer Stuart Holroyd to write an account of their adventures, which appeared in 1977 as Prelude to the Landing on Planet Earth (re-titled Briefings for the Landing on Planet Earth in paperback).
In this extraordinary book the true identity of the Nine - and of Tom - was finally revealed.
Far from being the chummy character that his rather avuncular name suggests, Tom is actually Atum, the creator-god of the ancient Egyptian religion of Heliopolis, and Uncle Tom with his eight mates are none other than the Great Ennead of Heliopolis.
But even with such impressive contacts, all was not well with Puharich.
Lab Nine broke up in 1978 after a series of mysterious events that culminated in an arson attack on the Ossining estate, and he fled to Mexico, claiming that he was being persecuted by the CIA. He returned to the USA two years later and appears to have played no further part in The Nine story. He died in 1995 after falling down the stairs in his South Carolina home. [MJF: Hmmmm… was it really an accident I wonder?]
However, The Nine continued...
Not only did Schlemmer and Whitmore continue their mission, but Dr Hurtak has also moved on. He has become a major player in the unfolding millennial drama currently being played out at Giza, but perhaps more importantly he has established himself as a New Age guru par excellence, travelling the world giving workshops on his book of channelled revelations from The Nine, The Keys of Enoch.
Written and laid out in classic Biblical style, its darkly apocalyptic vision has huge numbers of influential devotees.
Another Nine channel - an Englishwoman named Jenny O’Connor - was introduced to the avant garde Esalen Institute in San Francisco by Sir John Whitmore.
She and The Nine became so influential there that they held seminars and - unbelievably - were actually listed on the Institute’s staff, even successfully ordering the sacking of its chief finance officer and the reorganisation of its entire management structure.
This should concern us, because many influential people attended The Nine’s Esalen seminars, including Russians who were part of the Institute’s Soviet Exchange program. Some of these later rose to prominence in the Gorbachev regime and were instrumental in the downfall of Communism. (The Esalen Institute now runs the US branch of the Gorbachev Foundation.)
But, as Picknett and Prince ask, are The Nine really the ancient Ennead of Egypt?Written and laid out in classic Biblical style, its darkly apocalyptic vision has huge numbers of influential devotees.
Another Nine channel - an Englishwoman named Jenny O’Connor - was introduced to the avant garde Esalen Institute in San Francisco by Sir John Whitmore.
She and The Nine became so influential there that they held seminars and - unbelievably - were actually listed on the Institute’s staff, even successfully ordering the sacking of its chief finance officer and the reorganisation of its entire management structure.
This should concern us, because many influential people attended The Nine’s Esalen seminars, including Russians who were part of the Institute’s Soviet Exchange program. Some of these later rose to prominence in the Gorbachev regime and were instrumental in the downfall of Communism. (The Esalen Institute now runs the US branch of the Gorbachev Foundation.)
See also Laura’s very useful commentary on the Star Gate Conspiracy at: Book Review: The Stargate Conspiracy (cassiopaea.org)
In that article, Laura stated:
The Nine announced that they were the supreme high god of the Egyptians, Atum. As the "Nine Principles of Egypt embodied as One," the Nine claim to be returning to Earth to help mankind at a critical stage. The Cassiopaeans said something about this in the transcripts:
“Q: (L) Next question: I would like to know what is the "Council of Nine," as I have read about in several books. Now, there was an ancient council of nine, and then there is the one talked about by Phyllis Schlemmer Are there any references on the council of nine that you can give us?
A: Partial deception.
Q: Partial deception in the ancient references, or the modern ones?
A: Take ancient references and interpret modern accounts according to current events profile.!”
One of the chief concepts of The Nine is that the Earth was an "experiment in free will" that went wrong and if we just hold our mouth right, they will come in and fix things up for us as they have over and over again. This is, essentially, the idea that is being presented by dozens, hundreds of channelled sources.
So, let us take a look at the ancient accounts of The Nine or the Ennead, whilst recalling what Ra had said about the Zendar Council at the top of this article.
The Ennead
Historically, the Ennead (the Nine) were the nine primary gods of Egypt. The Ennead comprised the sun god Atum; his children Shu and Tefnut; their children Geb and Nut; and in turn their children Osiris, Isis and Nephthys. However, its claims to pre-eminence by the Heliopolitan priesthood were not respected throughout Egypt. In Memphis (within modern day Cairo), for example, the priests of the god Ptah celebrated him as superior to the Nine. This may be an important consideration given who I think Ptah really was (MJF: see my earlier posts on this subject where I linked the image and description of Ptah to that of an alien Grey).
The Egyptian Ennead
As Wikipedia points out, the ancient Egyptians created several enneads as their unification under the First Dynasty brought numerous local cults into contact with one another. Thus, The Pyramid Texts of Dynasties V and VI mention the "Great Ennead", the "Lesser Ennead", the "Dual Ennead", and the "Seven Enneads". Some pharaohs even established enneads that incorporated themselves as gods. However, the most important was the "Great" or "Heliopolitan Ennead" of Awanu (known under the Greeks and Romans as Heliopolis), which celebrated the family of the sun god Atum (sometimes referred to as Atum-Re) and thrived from the Old Kingdom to the Ptolemaic period. It should be noted here that Atum was connected in Egyptian cosmology particularly to the star system Sirius (the dog star), which may have profound implications given what the C’s said here about Sirius:
Session dated 4 October 1997:
Q: I also noticed that the word 'Osiris' could also be slightly modified to say 'of Sirius.' Comment, please.
A: Sirius was regarded highly in your "past."
Q: What was the foundation of this regard for Sirius?
A: "From whence cometh, is seen that which knows no limitation."
Q: Could you elaborate on that?
A: Could but will not.
Q: Why?
A: Because you can!
As I pointed out in an earlier post, the Egyptian god Sah and his consort Sopdet, known by the Greeks as Sothis, personified the constellation of Orion and the bright, first magnitude star Sirius. Their son was Horus Spd, another astral deity. Sah and Sopdet came to be viewed as manifestations of Osiris and Isis.
In the Pyramid Texts, Sah/Osiris is called “father of the gods.” The deceased king is said to enter the sky “In the name of the Dweller in Orion, with a season in the sky and a season on earth.” In these early texts the king is told, “You shall reach the sky as Orion, your soul shall be as effective as Sothis.” Orion (Sah/Osiris) is said to row towards the stars in a boat*, where he is surrounded by stars as he sails across the sky in a papyrus skiff (see the image above).
*MJF: Could this boat be the ‘Boat of a Million Years’, which the C’s told us was a time machine?In the Pyramid Texts, Sah/Osiris is called “father of the gods.” The deceased king is said to enter the sky “In the name of the Dweller in Orion, with a season in the sky and a season on earth.” In these early texts the king is told, “You shall reach the sky as Orion, your soul shall be as effective as Sothis.” Orion (Sah/Osiris) is said to row towards the stars in a boat*, where he is surrounded by stars as he sails across the sky in a papyrus skiff (see the image above).
Q: (L) Okay, going back to the pyramid. In the Pyramid Texts, when they talk about the ‘Boat of Millions of Years,’ what are they talking about?
A: Time machine.
And, of course, a time machine knows no limitation.
The development of the Ennead remains uncertain, although it appears to have first appeared when Ra's cult, which was supreme under Dynasty V, declined in importance under Dynasty VI. Egyptologists have traditionally theorised that the Heliopolitan priesthood created it to establish the pre-eminence of Atum over the other gods, incorporating some major gods in lesser positions and omitting others entirely. The most prominent of such deities was Osiris, the god of vegetation and the afterlife, who was incorporated into the Ennead as Atum's great-grandson. After the Great Ennead was well established, the cult of Ra – identified with Atum – recovered much of its importance until superseded by the cult of Horus. The two were then combined as Ra-Horus of the Horizons.
Atum was considered a protector of pharaohs. He was responsible for meeting them in their tombs and lifting them up into the afterlife. In the afterlife, the pharaohs – who were all considered Atum’s sons – would become stars that never died. One of Atum’s titles was “Father of Kings”. From our perspective, we should note that it was the pharaoh who channelled the gods of the Ennead and acted as their spokesman on Earth. Hence, we can see something of a connection here between the Egyptian pharaoh’s channelling of the Ennead in ancient Egypt and that which Puharich facilitated in the latter half of the 20th century through the channelling of The Nine.
However, were Puharich’s trance mediums channelling the same entities as those the Pharaohs channelled and knew as the Ennead? It is curious that when Laura raised this issue with the C’s they gave something of an ambiguous answer when they said it was a “partial deception” and Laura needed to “take ancient references and interpret modern accounts according to current events profile”. We need to ask then whether some of the information obtained from the channelling of The Nine was legitimate and correct. Perhaps the earlier sessions involving the Round Table Foundation were, whilst the later channellings of the character named Tom (the supposed alias for Atum) were those that involved the deception.
To confuse matters even more, the being or entity who was the source of the later ‘Law of One’ channellings used the name “Ra”, and we know the ancient Egyptian cult of Ra was identified with that of the Atum. Puharich would later sit in on a few sessions of the Law of One channellings and afterwards opined that he thought it was the same source as the one he and his colleagues had channelled in The Nine channellings. It may be important to note that unlike many Egyptian gods, Atum usually appears fully humanoid. This may tie in with what Ra said in the Law of One channellings where he stated: “we were able to clothe ourselves in a replica visible in the third density of our mind/body/spirit complexes in the sixth density”. Hence, we might legitimately ask the question whether the channelling of the Ennead by the ancient Egyptian pharaohs was part of the experiment that Ra said he had been allowed to conduct by the Council of Zendar? For this purpose, we should note that Ra used the personal pronoun “we” not “I” in the quote shown above. He could have. of course, have meant the royal “we”, as in the plural usage adopted by monarchs when speaking, but then again, he may have meant himself and fellow 6th density members of his Venusian based 6th density social memory complex or unified thought form collective.
This channelling of 6th density beings must also embrace the Cassiopaeans too, for they have admitted that they were in communication with a group of Kentakkians prior to their planet’s destruction and later with their descendants who they described as the “Northern Peoples”:
Session 24 September 1995:Atum was considered a protector of pharaohs. He was responsible for meeting them in their tombs and lifting them up into the afterlife. In the afterlife, the pharaohs – who were all considered Atum’s sons – would become stars that never died. One of Atum’s titles was “Father of Kings”. From our perspective, we should note that it was the pharaoh who channelled the gods of the Ennead and acted as their spokesman on Earth. Hence, we can see something of a connection here between the Egyptian pharaoh’s channelling of the Ennead in ancient Egypt and that which Puharich facilitated in the latter half of the 20th century through the channelling of The Nine.
However, were Puharich’s trance mediums channelling the same entities as those the Pharaohs channelled and knew as the Ennead? It is curious that when Laura raised this issue with the C’s they gave something of an ambiguous answer when they said it was a “partial deception” and Laura needed to “take ancient references and interpret modern accounts according to current events profile”. We need to ask then whether some of the information obtained from the channelling of The Nine was legitimate and correct. Perhaps the earlier sessions involving the Round Table Foundation were, whilst the later channellings of the character named Tom (the supposed alias for Atum) were those that involved the deception.
To confuse matters even more, the being or entity who was the source of the later ‘Law of One’ channellings used the name “Ra”, and we know the ancient Egyptian cult of Ra was identified with that of the Atum. Puharich would later sit in on a few sessions of the Law of One channellings and afterwards opined that he thought it was the same source as the one he and his colleagues had channelled in The Nine channellings. It may be important to note that unlike many Egyptian gods, Atum usually appears fully humanoid. This may tie in with what Ra said in the Law of One channellings where he stated: “we were able to clothe ourselves in a replica visible in the third density of our mind/body/spirit complexes in the sixth density”. Hence, we might legitimately ask the question whether the channelling of the Ennead by the ancient Egyptian pharaohs was part of the experiment that Ra said he had been allowed to conduct by the Council of Zendar? For this purpose, we should note that Ra used the personal pronoun “we” not “I” in the quote shown above. He could have. of course, have meant the royal “we”, as in the plural usage adopted by monarchs when speaking, but then again, he may have meant himself and fellow 6th density members of his Venusian based 6th density social memory complex or unified thought form collective.
This channelling of 6th density beings must also embrace the Cassiopaeans too, for they have admitted that they were in communication with a group of Kentakkians prior to their planet’s destruction and later with their descendants who they described as the “Northern Peoples”:
Q: (L) I am curious about what I call the "Scottish Question." Why is it that every time I start a paper trail on any issue of conspiracy, there always seems to be a link to Scotland and Scots?
A: "Celtic," what does it mean?
Q: (L) Well, the word "kilt" comes from "Celtic," but no one seems to know where they originated... they just sort of appeared on the landscape, so to speak.
A: Exactly!
Q: (L) Are you going to tell us?
A: No, not just as of yet.
Q: (L) Well, the word "kilt" comes from "Celtic," but no one seems to know where they originated... they just sort of appeared on the landscape, so to speak.
A: Exactly!
Q: (L) Are you going to tell us?
A: No, not just as of yet.
Q: (L) So, there is some interesting connection! (RC) Does it mean "warrior race?"
A: If you prefer! We have close affiliation with the "Northern Peoples." Why? Because we were in regular, direct contact with them on Kantek, before they were "lifted" to Earth by Orion STS.
These “Northern Peoples” presumably included the Hyperboreans and later the Celts and Scandinavians, who had their own pantheons of gods, which in the latter case involved an ennead of their own (see below). The Cassiopaeans have also admitted to having been in contact with Abraham/Moses, which means that Laura has been in august company. I will devote a separate post to this Abraham/Moses association with the C’s, as it deserves a careful analysis of its own given the important role Abraham/Moses has played in the three main monotheistic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. In the meantime, let us look at other examples of enneads, who exercised a powerful influence over peoples and cultures widely scattered by time and geography.
The Nine Emperor Gods of Taoism or Daoism
Taoism or Daoism refers to a set of Chinese traditions and religions which emphasise living in harmony with the Dao ('Way' or 'Path'). The Dao is generally defined as the source of everything and the ultimate principle underlying reality. Daoism includes various self-cultivation methods, including meditation, internal alchemy, and various rituals. Common aims include becoming one with the natural flow of the Dao, longevity, becoming a sage (zhenren) and even an immortal (xian). The roots of Daoism go back at least to the 4th century BC, and it has had a profound influence on Chinese culture over the course of the centuries.
Some elements of Daoism may be traced to prehistoric folk religions in China. In particular, many Daoist practices drew from the Warring States era phenomena of the wu (Chinese shamans) and the fangshi ("method masters", which probably derived from the "archivist-soothsayers of antiquity"). These method masters were Chinese technical specialists who flourished from the third century BC to the fifth century AD. English translations of fangshi include alchemist, astrologer, diviner, exorcist, geomancer, doctor, magician, monk, mystic, necromancer, occultist, omenologist, physician, physiognomist, technician, technologist, thaumaturge (wonderworking), and wizard. Perhaps a general description for them would be “Esoteric Masters". However, as you can see from this lst, the fangshi would seem to have had a lot in common with the Egyptian priests of ancient Egypt and the later Egyptian Therapeutae (and Essenes) and even later still with the Rosicrucians of the Middle Ages and beyond.
Some elements of Daoism may be traced to prehistoric folk religions in China. In particular, many Daoist practices drew from the Warring States era phenomena of the wu (Chinese shamans) and the fangshi ("method masters", which probably derived from the "archivist-soothsayers of antiquity"). These method masters were Chinese technical specialists who flourished from the third century BC to the fifth century AD. English translations of fangshi include alchemist, astrologer, diviner, exorcist, geomancer, doctor, magician, monk, mystic, necromancer, occultist, omenologist, physician, physiognomist, technician, technologist, thaumaturge (wonderworking), and wizard. Perhaps a general description for them would be “Esoteric Masters". However, as you can see from this lst, the fangshi would seem to have had a lot in common with the Egyptian priests of ancient Egypt and the later Egyptian Therapeutae (and Essenes) and even later still with the Rosicrucians of the Middle Ages and beyond.
So, who were the Nine Emperor Gods?
These nine sky lords were believed by Daoists to be the original rulers of China and offspring of the supreme god of creation. The Nine Emperor Gods Jiǔ Huáng Xīng Jūn / Jiǔ Huáng Da Di (皇星君/九皇大帝) are the nine sons manifested by Father Emperor Zhou Yu Dou Fu Yuan Jun (斗父周御國王天) and Mother Dou Mu (斗母元君) of the stars of Ursus Major, the Great Bear (aka known as the Big Dipper or the Plough), who holds the Registrar of Life and Death [MJF: cf. this function with the role of Osiris as lord of the afterlife in ancient Egypt who weighed souls based on the lives they had led].
In Chinese cosmology, seven of the stars of the Great Bear are visible while two assistant stars are invisible to most people. According to the teachings of Taoism, the Nine Emperor Gods are high-ranking Star Lords who preside over the movement of planets and coordinate mortal Life and Death issues. It is here that we see a definite correspondence with the Council of Zendar, since the Nine Emperor Gods were meant to oversee the celestial realm (i.e., 5th and 6th density) whilst also watching over the affairs of mankind (at 3rd density).
This reference to the seven stars of Ursus Major or the Great Bear calls to mind the Egyptian Queen Sobekneferu's focus on the seven stars of Ursa Major as discussed in my article of 14 March 2023 (see: Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians | Page 72 | Cassiopaea Forum) on Bram Stoker and the Jewel of the Seven Stars. Sobekneferu was the first royal female to wear the twin crowns of Upper of Lower Egypt, reflecting how the god Atum was usually depicted in anthropomorphic form, wearing the dual white and red crown of Upper of Lower Egypt, reinforcing his connection with kingship. In that article, I quoted Andrew Collins’ where he said:
“… there is every indication that Sobekneferu was interested in this same set of stars through her veneration of the crocodile god Sobek. In ancient Egyptian astronomy the crocodile was shown climbing on the back of a female hippopotamus, or as part of a hippo-croc hybrid. This combined sky figure has been identified with the stars of Draco, the celestial dragon of Greek and Arabic sky lore ( Lull and Belmonte, 2009 ), one of the key constellations of the northern night sky. Both the crocodile and hippo have also been identified with the stars of Ursa Major and Ursa Minor (Berio, 2014), which are themselves extremely close to Draco.In Chinese cosmology, seven of the stars of the Great Bear are visible while two assistant stars are invisible to most people. According to the teachings of Taoism, the Nine Emperor Gods are high-ranking Star Lords who preside over the movement of planets and coordinate mortal Life and Death issues. It is here that we see a definite correspondence with the Council of Zendar, since the Nine Emperor Gods were meant to oversee the celestial realm (i.e., 5th and 6th density) whilst also watching over the affairs of mankind (at 3rd density).
This reference to the seven stars of Ursus Major or the Great Bear calls to mind the Egyptian Queen Sobekneferu's focus on the seven stars of Ursa Major as discussed in my article of 14 March 2023 (see: Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians | Page 72 | Cassiopaea Forum) on Bram Stoker and the Jewel of the Seven Stars. Sobekneferu was the first royal female to wear the twin crowns of Upper of Lower Egypt, reflecting how the god Atum was usually depicted in anthropomorphic form, wearing the dual white and red crown of Upper of Lower Egypt, reinforcing his connection with kingship. In that article, I quoted Andrew Collins’ where he said:
Victorian mythologist Gerald Massey (1828-1907) identified the hippo-croc sky figure of ancient Egypt as a primeval genitrix, a form of Tawaret as mother of Seth (the Greek Typhon), controlling both the turning of the heavens and the passage of time. He mentions this primordial deity several times in his two-volume work The Book of Beginnings , calling her the “goddess of the seven stars.”
As I then pointed out:
“In Theosophy (which is based primarily on Madam Blavatsky's writings), it is believed that the Seven Stars of the Pleiades focus the spiritual energy of the seven rays from the Galactic Logos to the Seven Stars of the Great Bear, then to Sirius [MJF: which is linked to Atum], then to the Sun, then to the god of Earth (Sanat Kumara), and finally through the seven Masters of the Seven Rays (i.e., Blavatsky's Ascended Masters) to the human race.
It may well be that the Golden Dawn shared a similar outlook to their Theosophist contemporaries where the Seven Stars of the Great Bear were concerned, one which may have informed Stoker in his writings.
It may well be that the Golden Dawn shared a similar outlook to their Theosophist contemporaries where the Seven Stars of the Great Bear were concerned, one which may have informed Stoker in his writings.
But could there be another connection with Ursa Major, one that relates directly to the quest for the Grail?
Session 26 July 1997:
Q: What is the meaning of 'The Widow's Son?' The implication?
A: Stalks path of wisdom incarnate.
Q: Why is this described as a Widow's son? This was the appellation of Perceval...
A: Perceval was knighted in the court of seven.
Q: The court of seven what?
A: Swords points signify crystal transmitter of truth beholden.
The C's subsequently elaborated further on this point in connection with Laura's questions concerning the Egyptian Pyramid Texts and the Seven Sages (MJF: Could these be the Masters of the Seven Rays and Blavatsky's Ascended Masters? See also see my previous post.) in the Session dated 22 August 1998:
Q: (L) The Pyramid Texts also talk about the ‘Duat.’ What is this?
A: Scene of martyrdom. [MJF: Curiously some Daoist traditions link the Nine Emperor Gods to the 9 martyrs of the Qin dynasty – could there be some distant connection here to what the C’s were describing?]
Q: (L) They also talk about the ‘Seven Sages.’ You once said that Perceval was ‘knighted in the Court of Seven and that the sword’s points signify ‘crystal transmitter of truth beholden.’ Do these seven sages relate to this ‘Court of Seven’ that you mentioned?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When you said ‘swords points signify crystal transmitter of truth beholden,’ could you elaborate on that remark?
A: Has celestial meaning.
The word "celestial" when used as an adjective means "positioned in or relating to the sky, or outer space as observed in astronomy", as in a celestial body. It can also mean in a religious context "belonging or relating to heaven", as in the celestial city. Finally, it can mean something which is "supremely good" as in celestial beauty. However, sticking with the first meaning, could the C's have meant that the court of seven related to a celestial body or group of such bodies, as in a star or constellation? If so, could they have had in mind Ursa Major whose stars may have been viewed by the ancients as a handle turning the heavens around the pole star Polaris?”
Could there be a connection between the Egyptian goddess of the seven stars of Ursa Major and Father Emperor Zhou Yu Dou Fu Yuan Jun [comparable in many ways to Atum] and Mother Dou Mu who manifested the Daoist Nine Emperor Gods, who in turn were intimately linked in Daoist lore to the stars of Ursa Major? If so, are we seeing the involvement of the Council of Nine with two very different cultures in two different time periods? If that is the case, could the C’s ‘Court of Seven’ be linked to the Ennead or Council of Nine and by extension to the Zendar Council?
However, the Ennead have also appeared in various other pantheons of the gods. Hence, we must ask whether we may be seeing the same group of higher density beings operating under different names in different geographical areas during different eras, but always with the same basic objective(s) in mind?
Could there be a connection between the Egyptian goddess of the seven stars of Ursa Major and Father Emperor Zhou Yu Dou Fu Yuan Jun [comparable in many ways to Atum] and Mother Dou Mu who manifested the Daoist Nine Emperor Gods, who in turn were intimately linked in Daoist lore to the stars of Ursa Major? If so, are we seeing the involvement of the Council of Nine with two very different cultures in two different time periods? If that is the case, could the C’s ‘Court of Seven’ be linked to the Ennead or Council of Nine and by extension to the Zendar Council?
However, the Ennead have also appeared in various other pantheons of the gods. Hence, we must ask whether we may be seeing the same group of higher density beings operating under different names in different geographical areas during different eras, but always with the same basic objective(s) in mind?
The Lords of the Night
In Mesoamerican mythology the Lords of the Night (Classical Nahuatl: Yoalteuctin) are a set of nine gods who each ruled over every ninth night forming a calendrical cycle. Each lord was associated with a particular fortune, bad or good, that was an omen for the night that they ruled over. The lords of the night are known in both the Aztec and Maya calendar, although the specific names of the Maya Night Lords are unknown. The only Mayan light lord that has been identified is the God G9, Pauahtun the Aged Quadripartite God.
The Nine Lords of the Night in Aztec mythology are:
Xiuhtecuhtli ("Turquoise/Year/Fire Lord")
The Nine Lords of the Night in Aztec mythology are:
Xiuhtecuhtli ("Turquoise/Year/Fire Lord")
Tezcatlipoca ("Smoking Mirror")
Piltzintecuhtli ("Prince Lord")
Centeotl ("Maize God")
Mictlantecuhtli ("Underworld Lord")
Chalchiuhtlicue ("Jade Is Her Skirt")
Tlazolteotl ("Filth God[dess]")
Tepeyollotl ("Mountain Heart")
Tlaloc ("Rain God")
The Nine Unknown Men of Ashoka
The society of the Nine Unknown Men was formed shortly after 226 BC by Emperor Ashoka. Grandson of the legendary Emperor who unified the Indian subcontinent, Chandragupta, Ashoka was anxious to uphold his grandfather’s legacy and maintain the empire.
According to Buddhist legend Ashoka summoned nine of the most brilliant minds in India at the time to be consulted before making any big decisions. For security purposes, the identity of these men was never made public. Together, these geniuses formed a secret society that came to be known as the ‘Nine Unknown Men’.
This organisation sought to accumulate all the scientific knowledge it could from natural science to psychology to the composition of matter. Fearing that if ordinary men were given this scientific knowledge they would use it for destruction, only the Nine Men were allowed to study and develop scientific theories and technology [MJF: compare this with the Pythagoreans who adopted a similar approach to scientific study and maintained a veil of secrecy over their knowledge too]. To better accomplish this daunting task, each of the nine was charged with a specific book that he was to update, revise, and ultimately perfect as regards the knowledge therein. When one of the nine could no longer complete the task – whether from the wish to retire, fading health, or death – the obligation was passed to a chosen successor. The number of members in the society was always to be kept at nine. Thus, the society of the Nine Unknown Men has allegedly lived on for over 2000 years.
According to Buddhist legend Ashoka summoned nine of the most brilliant minds in India at the time to be consulted before making any big decisions. For security purposes, the identity of these men was never made public. Together, these geniuses formed a secret society that came to be known as the ‘Nine Unknown Men’.
This organisation sought to accumulate all the scientific knowledge it could from natural science to psychology to the composition of matter. Fearing that if ordinary men were given this scientific knowledge they would use it for destruction, only the Nine Men were allowed to study and develop scientific theories and technology [MJF: compare this with the Pythagoreans who adopted a similar approach to scientific study and maintained a veil of secrecy over their knowledge too]. To better accomplish this daunting task, each of the nine was charged with a specific book that he was to update, revise, and ultimately perfect as regards the knowledge therein. When one of the nine could no longer complete the task – whether from the wish to retire, fading health, or death – the obligation was passed to a chosen successor. The number of members in the society was always to be kept at nine. Thus, the society of the Nine Unknown Men has allegedly lived on for over 2000 years.
Nine Etruscan Deities – Novensiles
The basis of Etruscan religion was the fundamental idea that the destiny of man was completely determined by the vagaries of the many deities worshipped by the Etruscans. Among various gods worshipped by the Etruscans special place was reserved for the collective deities Known as the ‘Novensiles’.
These were Nine gods of lightning whose strikes were thought to indicate future events depending on their location. Ancient Roman scholar and writer Marcus Terentius Varro suggested that they are nine, because in doing anything that number is always reputed most powerful and greatest and they had obtained their power from Jupiter (the Roman Zeus) to wield his thunder. All nine alike were briefly and compendiously invoked under one name – Novensiles.
These were Nine gods of lightning whose strikes were thought to indicate future events depending on their location. Ancient Roman scholar and writer Marcus Terentius Varro suggested that they are nine, because in doing anything that number is always reputed most powerful and greatest and they had obtained their power from Jupiter (the Roman Zeus) to wield his thunder. All nine alike were briefly and compendiously invoked under one name – Novensiles.
Zeus and ‘Council of Nine’
In Greek mythology, when Prometheus gave fire to mankind, he infuriated Zeus so much that to punish Prometheus, Zeus had him chained to a rock and every day an eagle came down and ate his liver. Because he was immortal, the liver grew back, and the eagle returned to do the same to him the next day ad infinitum. To punish mankind, Zeus and eight other deities gathered to form the Council of Nine.
The Council members were Aphrodite, Apollo, Athena, Demeter, Hephaestus, Hera, Hermes, Poseidon and Zeus himself.
Together this council created Pandora, and sent her, as a gift, to Epimetheus. Epimetheus was also given Pandora’s Box and told to never open it. Curiosity got the better of Pandora and she opened the box, thereby releasing all of the misfortunes of Mankind [MJF: Is this a code for scientific knowledge, the misuse of which destroyed the Atlanteans?].
The Council members were Aphrodite, Apollo, Athena, Demeter, Hephaestus, Hera, Hermes, Poseidon and Zeus himself.
Together this council created Pandora, and sent her, as a gift, to Epimetheus. Epimetheus was also given Pandora’s Box and told to never open it. Curiosity got the better of Pandora and she opened the box, thereby releasing all of the misfortunes of Mankind [MJF: Is this a code for scientific knowledge, the misuse of which destroyed the Atlanteans?].
The Nine Muses of the Greek Mythology
The Nine Muses of the Greek Mythology were deities that gave artists, philosophers and individuals the necessary inspiration for creation [MJF: which makes me think here of the activities of Thor’s Pantheum].
Hesiod reveals that they were called Muses or Mouses in Greek, as the Greek word “mosis” refers to the desire and wish. The word “museum” derives from the Greek Muses.
The Nine Muses were: Clio, Euterpe, Thalia, Melpomeni, Terpsichore, Erato, Polymnia, Ourania and Calliope.
All the ancient writers appealed to the Muses at the beginning of their work. Homer asked the Muses both in the Iliad and the Odyssey to help him tell the story in the most proper way, and right up until today the Muses are symbols of inspiration and artistic creation.
In paintings, the Muses are usually presented as ethereal women with divine beauty, holding laurels and other items depending on their particular faculty.
Hesiod reveals that they were called Muses or Mouses in Greek, as the Greek word “mosis” refers to the desire and wish. The word “museum” derives from the Greek Muses.
The Nine Muses were: Clio, Euterpe, Thalia, Melpomeni, Terpsichore, Erato, Polymnia, Ourania and Calliope.
All the ancient writers appealed to the Muses at the beginning of their work. Homer asked the Muses both in the Iliad and the Odyssey to help him tell the story in the most proper way, and right up until today the Muses are symbols of inspiration and artistic creation.
In paintings, the Muses are usually presented as ethereal women with divine beauty, holding laurels and other items depending on their particular faculty.
For more see: Significance Of The 'Divine Nine' In Ancient Cultures - Look4ward
Continued in Part 2
The Council of Nine Part 2
The Norse Gods
Session 10 October 1998:
Q: (A) I want to ask about the meaning of my dream, which was so vivid... about Elohim and Seraphim. What was the meaning of this dream?
A: Peace torch.
Q: (A) What is peace torch? From whom?
A: Not from. All considered before decision on judgment.
Q: (L) That makes no sense at all.
A: Yes it does.
Q: (A) Who were the Elohim?
A: Elohim refers to past, as a connection to future as envisioned in your dream. It is the connector that counts, see?? Ruling council of Od; Odiem. [MJF: and we know the Elohim are transdefinitive and variable entities (shapeshifters?) who originally manifested as humans but then as non-human after making a pact or covenant with the 4th density STS Rosteem, who now manifest as the Rosicrucians.]
Q: (L) What about the Seraphim?
A: Council in clouds... We are speaking of advanced insight here.
Q: (L) Why were there 300 Elohim and 301 Seraphim?
A: Who is the odd one out?
Q: (A) Who is the odd one out?
A: Check your roots. Od, odiem, odd, could we spell it out any clearer for you? Not without abridging free will!
Q: (L) Who is Sara? [MJF: we now know that Sara or Sarah, Abraham’s wife in the Bible, was in reality Nefertiti, a subterranean hybrid.]
A: Roots.
In old Norse the noun Óð, is said to mean mind, soul or spirit. Óðr was also the husband of the goddess Freya and usually identified as the root of Odin. Odin, along with Freya, were the two greatest practitioners of shamanism amongst the Norse gods.
The noun óðr is also descriptive of the masculine shamanic power of the Aesir - ecstasy, fury, inspiration - but Odin is also able to wield the mystical feminine power of the Vanir - seidr - bestowed on him by the goddess Freya.
Thus, does the C’s reference to “Od” “Odiem” point to Odin or Woden? Where the C’s tell Laura to check her roots, is this because her English, Anglo-Saxon ancestors were Woden or Wotan worshippers, the Gemanic equivalent of Odin. In other words, are they saying that Laura, as someone of Nordic descent, is a child of Odin?"
Thus Elohim-Yeahweh becomes “tungla ársvé” in Old Norse, perfectly explainable, as astro-agrarian yuletide, at sun’s nadir.
Session 29 April 1995:
Q: (L) Do they all share a common origin?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And what is that origin?
A: Neormm.
Q: (L) Neormm?
A: Closest English equivalent.
Q: (L) Is that a place?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Where is it?
A: Check star guides.
Session 7 June 1997:
Q: In a previous session where you introduced the concept of perpendicular realities, you stated that (T) was connected to a particular reality called 'Neormm.' You also designated the 'thought centre' of STS as Ormethion. I noticed the similarity of the names. Is there a relationship?
A: The orm is close to orimulsion. Look it up.
A: Our answers have meaning best not to presuppose!
Session 31 October 1998
Q: Now, I have long wondered about something you said to Terry, about him being connected to a thought center called Neormm, and that it was related to orimulsion, and this is some kind of a fuel. I wonder if you could clarify that remark. What is Neormm?
A: Not yet.
Session 7 November 1998:
Q: (L) Okay, I want to ask: what is the relationship between Neormm and Odiem?
A: Take the two and look for hidden words.
I would be interested if anyone has any further thoughts on these two strange words.
Do they read the C's transcripts I wonder? Any ideas? This is seriously weird!
The Tuatha dé Danaan
These god-like beings included:
Dian Cécht, the physician or healer of the gods.
Nuadu, the king or leader of the Tuatha dé Danaan.
The Dagda, the great god.
The Morrígan or Mórrígan, the "great queen".
Lugh or Lug, the son of Cian, who wields an unstoppable fiery spear [MJF: shades of Odin here and Zeus with his thunderbolts].
Aengus, the son of the Dagda and brother of Brigid.
Brigid or Brigit/Brig meaning 'exalted one’, the daughter of the Dagda. As a goddess, she is sometimes linked with the Romano Celtic goddess Brigantia. She is associated with wisdom, poetry, healing, protection, smithing and domesticated animals.
Goibniu, the metalsmith of the Tuatha dé Danaan.
A: Orange is reference to hair colour.
Bluegazer said:
"Maybe that's the property that makes them bi-density?
Session dated 7 June 1997:
Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts ate a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination?
A: Trichinosis used to be non-existent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this.
Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichonosis, and the Aryans were not?
A: Originally.
Q: So, it was necessary for the Jews not to eat the pork, but not for the Aryans, and the mixing caused susceptibility. In a general sense, are strong Aryan genetics indicative of the necessity for the consumption of meat?
A: In a sense, but pescadorial features substitute semi-adequately.
Q: Pescadorial. Semi-adequately. What needed to be added so that the substitution would be not just semi-adequate, but totally adequate?
A: Iron/protein levels.
Q: So, it is the iron that the Celts need? Well, that brings me to the next question: In all the Celtic folklore when they talk about 'fairies,' which are obviously other density beings very similar to our modern 'Gray alien,' these fairy/slash aliens insist that no iron come near them in any way. It was also said that bringing iron into contact with someone thought to be a 'changeling' would prove whether or not they were because if they were, they would disappear instantly. Also, the instructions for the building of the Temple of Solomon included restrictions on the use of iron in either the preparation of the materials or the putting together of the building itself, even down to the rejection of the use of iron nails in any part. What is the significance of this restriction on the use of iron by these other density beings, whoever they are?
A: Bloodline trails.
Q: Are you saying that... I don't understand... not even well enough to frame another question...
A: You will, my dear, oh will you! [MJF: This seems to be a reference to the upcoming realm border crossing, which will facilitate the movement of an as yet unknown number of people to 4th density.]
Q: If it was necessary for the Aryans to have iron... okay, maybe the iron is something that interacts...
A: What about iron as an element?
Q: Okay, let's see: {consults dictionary} Iron –derived from early Celt 'iserno,' via Illyrian 'eisarno' from the IndoEuropean base 'eis,' which means to 'move vigorously; strong, holy.' It is a white, malleable, ductile, metallic chemical element that can be readily magnetized, rusts rapidly in moist or salty air, and is vital to plant and animal life; it is the most common and important of all metals, and its alloys, as steel, are extensively used. Symbol: Fe; atomic weight: 55.847; atomic number: 26; specific gravity: 7.86; melting point: 1535 degrees Centigrade; boiling point 3,000 degrees C. The electron shells are thus: 2,14,8,2. Iron is an element of blood, hemoglobin, and is easily magnetized... there is some new work about iron and magnetite in the brains of people who are psychic or have 'abduction' experiences... is it the magnetism?
A: Yes....
Q: Is it something that holds one more firmly in 3rd density, and the elimination of it enables one to switch densities... or...
A: Tis magnetite that acts as a conduit, and perhaps, just perhaps, allows for transference back and forth at will?!? [MJF: Teleportation] And what about the legend about the alchemists? Is not the key term there really transformation?!? And has not the "smoke screen" really been delivered so effectively by all the concentration upon the substance?!? And does not this remind one indeed of all the misguided concentration upon substance rather than meaning that one finds so regularly on 3rd density??
Q: I get it! So, it is the magnetite in the body, that collects and holds the charge, and it has absolutely nothing to do with an external substance at all! Is that it?
A: You are getting "warmer."
Q: Am I right, we need more iron for magnetite, or am I completely off base here?
A: You are right, but, do not underestimate the significance of that just delivered! What better deception than to divert the meaning of alchemy, by focusing upon substance, then addicting those souls bound to 3rd density to the substance?
And again in the session dated 5 December 1998:
Q: So, when you said 'template, Templar,' you were possibly referring to the fact that what was going on here, the constructions, the name and word clues, and even the events and incidents may have been a model that we should look for in other places?
A: Temples too.
Q: What is the...
A: What is behind your temples?
Q: Behind, in a general sense? The creators, the instigators? The church?
A: Place your fingers upon...
Q: What do you put your fingers on that has to do with a temple? Place your fingers on your temple? On your head? What is behind your temple? Your brain...
A: Which part?
Q: Well, the TEMPORAL lobe... the part of the brain where magnetite is found.
A: Yes....
Q: So, what are you getting at here?
A: We are not, you will.
Q: So, the instructions or clues found in this place, may, in fact, apply to some other location? Is that it?
A: Or to a grid.
Q: Was Saunier aware of this grid?
A: It is not important, the grid is.
Could there be any evidence of the involvement of ET agents like the fictional Gary Seven in modern times? The answer is possibly.
The Strange Case of Valiant Thor
According to Frank E. Stranges, Eisenhower asked Thor where he was from, to which Thor gave a rather cryptic response: "the morning and the evening star". Below is the alleged dialogue exchange provided by Stranges:
Eisenhower: "Please, sir, what is your name? And where do you come from?"
Thor: "I come from the planet your Bible calls the morning and the evening star."
Eisenhower: "Venus?"
Thor: "Yes, sir."
Eisenhower: "Can you prove this?"
Thor: "What do you constitute as proof?"
Eisenhower: "I don’t know."
Q: (L) Does the government have or did they ever have a treaty with any aliens?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is the treaty still in effect?
A: Never was.
Q: (L) Did they try to get a treaty with them?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Did the aliens refuse?
A: No. Tricked.
Q: (L) Where was Venus originally from?
A: Ancient wanderer from near Arcturus.
“It’s like there is this whole other reality going on that we don’t hear about!” she stated, “These timelines and the deeper history connected to secret societies, connected to these deeper ET agendas that have been around for thousands of years!”
I certainly agree with those comments and would ask whether the deeper ET agendas she refers to include those of the Council of Nine?
For more on this subject see: The Eisenhower Alien Meetings Are "Just The Tip Of The Iceberg!" - UFO Insight
The Norse Gods
In the mythic story of the Ragnarök, which is like a Nordic version of Armageddon or a ‘twilight of the gods’ saga, many of the main Norse gods (including Odin and Thor) die in a climactic battle against the forces of destruction or chaos that takes place against a background of natural disasters and the submersion of the world in water. After the battle, the surviving and returning gods subsequently meet up again and the world is repopulated by two human survivors. Interestingly, it transpires yet again that there are nine main surviving deities who are left to watch over mankind as Odin and company had done before.
Is there any echo of this Norse gods link to the Council of Zendar or the Council of Nine? Well, there may be. In the transcripts there is a reference to another dream Laura had (we have referred to it previously in an earlier post), which seems to involve a council sitting in judgement:
Is there any echo of this Norse gods link to the Council of Zendar or the Council of Nine? Well, there may be. In the transcripts there is a reference to another dream Laura had (we have referred to it previously in an earlier post), which seems to involve a council sitting in judgement:
Session 10 October 1998:
Q: (A) I want to ask about the meaning of my dream, which was so vivid... about Elohim and Seraphim. What was the meaning of this dream?
A: Peace torch.
Q: (A) What is peace torch? From whom?
A: Not from. All considered before decision on judgment.
Q: (L) That makes no sense at all.
A: Yes it does.
Q: (A) Who were the Elohim?
A: Elohim refers to past, as a connection to future as envisioned in your dream. It is the connector that counts, see?? Ruling council of Od; Odiem. [MJF: and we know the Elohim are transdefinitive and variable entities (shapeshifters?) who originally manifested as humans but then as non-human after making a pact or covenant with the 4th density STS Rosteem, who now manifest as the Rosicrucians.]
Q: (L) What about the Seraphim?
A: Council in clouds... We are speaking of advanced insight here.
Q: (L) Why were there 300 Elohim and 301 Seraphim?
A: Who is the odd one out?
Q: (A) Who is the odd one out?
A: Check your roots. Od, odiem, odd, could we spell it out any clearer for you? Not without abridging free will!
Q: (L) Who is Sara? [MJF: we now know that Sara or Sarah, Abraham’s wife in the Bible, was in reality Nefertiti, a subterranean hybrid.]
A: Roots.
So, after the Council of Zendar or Saturn and the Council of Nine, we now have a council in clouds and a ruling council of Od or Odiem, who may be connected to the Elohim. We may assume here that the ruling council of Od or Odiem is the same as the council in clouds. If by Laura’s roots, the C’s are referring to her Nordic (Norman) roots through the Percy family, then Od or Odiem may be referring to Odin, the supreme god of the Norse pantheon, who was therefore the equivalent of Zeus in the Greek pantheon and Jupiter in the Roman pantheon.
We have looked at this matter, including the possible link between the fiery Seraphim and the Lizards, before – ref. my post on The Egyptian Pilgrimage of Initiation Part 2 dated 27 August 2022 (see Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians | Page 52 | Cassiopaea Forum). In that post, I pointed out that Saturn was:
“… a planet linked to Cronus (Kronos, Chronos, Saturn) the Titan god of time and ages who was, above all, associated with the destructive force of time which sooner or later consumes everything. Cronus was the father of Zeus, who became the King of the Olympian gods of Greece and led them to victory over Cronus and his fellow Titans. Cronus had been the leader and youngest of the first generation of Titans, the divine descendants of the primordial Gaia (Mother Earth) and Uranus (Father Sky). He overthrew his father and ruled during the mythological Golden Age until he in turn was overthrown by his son Zeus.
Zeus’ equivalent in the Nordic and Germanic pantheons was Odin or Woden. Just as Zeus was the ancestor of many of Greece’s founding kings, Odin was believed to have been the forefather of many of the Germanic (Aryan) peoples. The two gods also have remarkably similar origin stories. While Zeus is a master of the sky and a thunder god, Odin walked the line between the realms of the living and the dead and was a wise god whose power lay within his wisdom. While Zeus hurled thunder bolts down from Olympus, Odin, although a god of war, was better known for his wit, intelligence, and wisdom. However, in Norse mythology, Odin’s son Thor (the Norse god of thunder) can be viewed in many ways as being more similar to the Olympian king than Odin himself.
We have looked at this matter, including the possible link between the fiery Seraphim and the Lizards, before – ref. my post on The Egyptian Pilgrimage of Initiation Part 2 dated 27 August 2022 (see Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians | Page 52 | Cassiopaea Forum). In that post, I pointed out that Saturn was:
“… a planet linked to Cronus (Kronos, Chronos, Saturn) the Titan god of time and ages who was, above all, associated with the destructive force of time which sooner or later consumes everything. Cronus was the father of Zeus, who became the King of the Olympian gods of Greece and led them to victory over Cronus and his fellow Titans. Cronus had been the leader and youngest of the first generation of Titans, the divine descendants of the primordial Gaia (Mother Earth) and Uranus (Father Sky). He overthrew his father and ruled during the mythological Golden Age until he in turn was overthrown by his son Zeus.
Zeus’ equivalent in the Nordic and Germanic pantheons was Odin or Woden. Just as Zeus was the ancestor of many of Greece’s founding kings, Odin was believed to have been the forefather of many of the Germanic (Aryan) peoples. The two gods also have remarkably similar origin stories. While Zeus is a master of the sky and a thunder god, Odin walked the line between the realms of the living and the dead and was a wise god whose power lay within his wisdom. While Zeus hurled thunder bolts down from Olympus, Odin, although a god of war, was better known for his wit, intelligence, and wisdom. However, in Norse mythology, Odin’s son Thor (the Norse god of thunder) can be viewed in many ways as being more similar to the Olympian king than Odin himself.
In old Norse the noun Óð, is said to mean mind, soul or spirit. Óðr was also the husband of the goddess Freya and usually identified as the root of Odin. Odin, along with Freya, were the two greatest practitioners of shamanism amongst the Norse gods.
The noun óðr is also descriptive of the masculine shamanic power of the Aesir - ecstasy, fury, inspiration - but Odin is also able to wield the mystical feminine power of the Vanir - seidr - bestowed on him by the goddess Freya.
Thus, does the C’s reference to “Od” “Odiem” point to Odin or Woden? Where the C’s tell Laura to check her roots, is this because her English, Anglo-Saxon ancestors were Woden or Wotan worshippers, the Gemanic equivalent of Odin. In other words, are they saying that Laura, as someone of Nordic descent, is a child of Odin?"
In that same post of 27 August 2022, I looked at various places that contained either Od, Odd or Odiem in their name such as Odiham in England and Odda in Norway. Another Forum member Manitoba subsequently mentioned a settlement called Oddi in Iceland, which had a school where Snorri Sturluson, the author of the Prose Edda and the Heimskringla that were some of the major sources for Norse mythology and religion, was fostered and educated at.
However, I came across yet another source which mentioned a place called Odense (Odin’s vé) in Denmark.
Odense (/ˈoʊdənsə/ OH-dən-sə, also /ˈoʊθənsə/ OH-thən-sə, Danish: [ˈoðˀn̩sə]) is the third largest city in Denmark. The name Odense is derived from Odins Vé, meaning "Odin's sanctuary", as the area was known as a sanctuary for worshippers of Odin. Archaeological excavations in the vicinity show proof of settlement for over 4,000 years since at least the Stone Age.
This same source also made a link between Odin and Adon/Adonai, the Hebrew word meaning “My Lord”, which came to be used by the Jews in place of Yahweh or Jehovah, as the name for God, outside of the Temple sanctuary. The same source added:
This same source also made a link between Odin and Adon/Adonai, the Hebrew word meaning “My Lord”, which came to be used by the Jews in place of Yahweh or Jehovah, as the name for God, outside of the Temple sanctuary. The same source added:
Thus Elohim-Yeahweh becomes “tungla ársvé” in Old Norse, perfectly explainable, as astro-agrarian yuletide, at sun’s nadir.
If this view is correct, then it establishes an interesting link between Odin the Norse supreme god and Yahweh the god of the Hebrews or Israelites, who the C’s identified as being a Lizard front. Does this suggest that the “children of Odin” are really the children of Yahweh?
Session 29 April 1995:
Q: (L) Do they all share a common origin?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And what is that origin?
A: Neormm.
Q: (L) Neormm?
A: Closest English equivalent.
Q: (L) Is that a place?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Where is it?
A: Check star guides.
Session 7 June 1997:
Q: In a previous session where you introduced the concept of perpendicular realities, you stated that (T) was connected to a particular reality called 'Neormm.' You also designated the 'thought centre' of STS as Ormethion. I noticed the similarity of the names. Is there a relationship?
A: The orm is close to orimulsion. Look it up.
MJF: As Laura discovered, Orimulsion is an emulsion of bitumen in water, which is used as an industrial boiler fuel in power plants. Orimulsion is made by mixing the bitumen with about 30% fresh water and a small amount of surfactant (chemical compounds that decrease the surface or interfacial tension between two liquids, a liquid and a gas, or a liquid and a solid.
ORM as an acronym stands for Object–relational mapping, which in computer science is a programming technique for converting data between a relational database and the heap of an object-oriented programming language. Thus, it is a framework that can help and simplify the translation between the two paradigms: objects and relational database tables. Does this shed any light upon the operation of the STS thought centre known as Ormethion?
Previously, we have noted that “Orm” is closely connected to “Orme” (Orbitally Rearranged Monoatomic Elements) or “Ormus”, which leads us to Monoatomic (white powdered) Gold or Manna, the great secret of the High Priests of Egypt, Moses, the Essenes (who preserved the knowledge after the destruction of the Temple of Herod), the Knights Templar and the medieval alchemists. You may also recall that “Ormus” was the name the Priory of Sion (Rosicrucians?) allegedly adopted after their split with the Knights Templar, as marked by the “Cutting of the Elm” incident at Gisors in 1188 AD.
As to “Orimulsion”, produced by mixing bitumen with water, when the white powder of monoatomic gold was mixed in water, it was known as “The Golden Tear from the Eye of Horus”. It was called, “That which issues from the mouth of the creator.” Where the Bible speaks of the man who will plant the golden tree of life, in Hebrew this is the ORME tree. [Credit to gnosisxsophia for this.]
Did the cutting down of the elm at Gisors therefore represent a symbolic destruction of the Orme or golden tree I wonder? Does this in part explain why the Priory of Sion adopted the name “Ormus” after that event?
Q: Well, what I am asking is about the possible relationship between Neormm and Ormethion...ORM as an acronym stands for Object–relational mapping, which in computer science is a programming technique for converting data between a relational database and the heap of an object-oriented programming language. Thus, it is a framework that can help and simplify the translation between the two paradigms: objects and relational database tables. Does this shed any light upon the operation of the STS thought centre known as Ormethion?
Previously, we have noted that “Orm” is closely connected to “Orme” (Orbitally Rearranged Monoatomic Elements) or “Ormus”, which leads us to Monoatomic (white powdered) Gold or Manna, the great secret of the High Priests of Egypt, Moses, the Essenes (who preserved the knowledge after the destruction of the Temple of Herod), the Knights Templar and the medieval alchemists. You may also recall that “Ormus” was the name the Priory of Sion (Rosicrucians?) allegedly adopted after their split with the Knights Templar, as marked by the “Cutting of the Elm” incident at Gisors in 1188 AD.
As to “Orimulsion”, produced by mixing bitumen with water, when the white powder of monoatomic gold was mixed in water, it was known as “The Golden Tear from the Eye of Horus”. It was called, “That which issues from the mouth of the creator.” Where the Bible speaks of the man who will plant the golden tree of life, in Hebrew this is the ORME tree. [Credit to gnosisxsophia for this.]
Did the cutting down of the elm at Gisors therefore represent a symbolic destruction of the Orme or golden tree I wonder? Does this in part explain why the Priory of Sion adopted the name “Ormus” after that event?
A: Our answers have meaning best not to presuppose!
Session 31 October 1998
Q: Now, I have long wondered about something you said to Terry, about him being connected to a thought center called Neormm, and that it was related to orimulsion, and this is some kind of a fuel. I wonder if you could clarify that remark. What is Neormm?
A: Not yet.
Session 7 November 1998:
Q: (L) Okay, I want to ask: what is the relationship between Neormm and Odiem?
A: Take the two and look for hidden words.
Well, if you combine the letters of both words one of the hidden words you can make is “Odin”, the Norse god and where stars or celestial objects are concerned you can make “Orion” (with all the implications that name carries!) as well as the “Moon”. We have already considered “Orm” and “Orme” above, but you can also construct the word “iron” too, which links us to magnetite. It may just be coincidence, but iron is, of course, a highly magnetic metal and you can produce the word or name “Neorem” from the two words, which just happens to be the name of a Finnish manufacturer of powerful magnets. This company specialises in the production of NdFeB magnets and pole elements for large electric motors and generators, especially for renewable energy applications. Curiously, the company was founded the same year that the C’s first mentioned the name Neormm. I can’t determine how the name “Neorem” arose or why it was adopted, but it does lead us back to Scandinavia again and by extension to Odin the chief god of the Norsemen.
I would be interested if anyone has any further thoughts on these two strange words.
BTW: Whilst researching for this article, I came across this very strange psychedelic music video on youtube
, which is full of occultic imagery (including tetrahedrons etc), and called:
Neormm @ Hitech Revolution México 2ed by @Lisergica25 - CDMX - video @BSTVBODYSUITTV
It is highly strange that the video should have the name "Neormm" in the title though. The second song is apparently called 'Language of Trees'. Here is a link to a webpage that is titled "Synthetic Reincarnations" - see: Neormm – Synthetic ReincarnationsDo they read the C's transcripts I wonder? Any ideas? This is seriously weird!
The Tuatha dé Danaan
Although I have not seen the fabled Irish Tuatha dé Danaan (Gaelic for “People of the Goddess Danu”) mentioned in connection with the Ennead or the Council of Nine, I am including them for a reason. In Celtic mythology, they were a magical or supernatural race inhabiting Ireland before the arrival of the Milesians (the Gaelic ancestors of the modern Irish). The Tuatha dé Danaan were said to have been skilled in magic, and the earliest reference to them relates that, after they were banished from heaven because of their knowledge [MJF: Shades of Prometheus and the Biblical Watchers here], they descended on Ireland in a cloud of mist [MJF: perhaps signifying a spacecraft or aircraft landing?].
These god-like beings included:
Dian Cécht, the physician or healer of the gods.
Nuadu, the king or leader of the Tuatha dé Danaan.
The Dagda, the great god.
The Morrígan or Mórrígan, the "great queen".
Lugh or Lug, the son of Cian, who wields an unstoppable fiery spear [MJF: shades of Odin here and Zeus with his thunderbolts].
Aengus, the son of the Dagda and brother of Brigid.
Brigid or Brigit/Brig meaning 'exalted one’, the daughter of the Dagda. As a goddess, she is sometimes linked with the Romano Celtic goddess Brigantia. She is associated with wisdom, poetry, healing, protection, smithing and domesticated animals.
Manannán or Manann, also known as Manannán mac Lir ("son of the sea"), is a warrior and ruler and guardian of the Otherworld [MJF: compare this with the role of Osiris in the Egyptian Ennead] who is associated with the sea and often interpreted as a sea god [MJF: thus comparable to the Greek Poseidon or Roman Neptune].
Goibniu, the metalsmith of the Tuatha dé Danaan.
Sometimes medieval Christian writers explained the Tuatha dé Danaan as being fallen angels who were neither wholly good nor evil, or an ancient people who became highly skilled in magic, but several writers acknowledged that at least some of them had been pagan gods.
Although I have named nine of the main members of the Tuatha dé Danaan above, there were several other notable figures among their ranks. You may ask, therefore, why I have included them with the other Enneads mentioned above. The answer lies in part with the image shown above.
The Tuatha Dé Danann are described as a supernatural race, much like idealised humans, who are immune from ageing and sickness, and who have powers of magic. The powers most often attributed to the Tuatha dé Danann are control over the weather and the elements, and the ability to shapeshift [MJF: a 4th density ability] themselves and other things. They live in the Otherworld, which is described as either a parallel world [MJF: 4th density] or a heavenly land beyond the sea or under the earth's surface [MJF: think here of the Aryan Nation of the Third Eye]. The Celts themselves regarded the Tuatha Dé Danann as Gods from the Green Land, the Island of the Four Masters, the legendary Thule or Hyperborea.
The Tuatha Dé Danann are often described as tall gods and goddesses that have blonde or red hair, blue or green eyes and pale skin and even as beings who were shining with light (“shining ones”?). Certainly, the image above depicts them as beautiful, red, blonde or golden-haired, god-like beings, much like the 4th density Nordics so often described in UFO encounters.
However, the fact that the Tuatha de Danann are associated with red, or flame-haired (orange) giants makes me think not only of descriptions of the Nephilim giants but also of the infamous STS Orions. So, could the Tuatha Dé Danann be connected to the Ennead or the Council of Nine? Intriguingly, the C’s may have offered a possible confirmation of this in the session dated 7 October 1995:
Q: (L) Who are the 'Orange' aliens mentioned as being the 'Council of Nine?' Although I have named nine of the main members of the Tuatha dé Danaan above, there were several other notable figures among their ranks. You may ask, therefore, why I have included them with the other Enneads mentioned above. The answer lies in part with the image shown above.
The Tuatha Dé Danann are described as a supernatural race, much like idealised humans, who are immune from ageing and sickness, and who have powers of magic. The powers most often attributed to the Tuatha dé Danann are control over the weather and the elements, and the ability to shapeshift [MJF: a 4th density ability] themselves and other things. They live in the Otherworld, which is described as either a parallel world [MJF: 4th density] or a heavenly land beyond the sea or under the earth's surface [MJF: think here of the Aryan Nation of the Third Eye]. The Celts themselves regarded the Tuatha Dé Danann as Gods from the Green Land, the Island of the Four Masters, the legendary Thule or Hyperborea.
The Tuatha Dé Danann are often described as tall gods and goddesses that have blonde or red hair, blue or green eyes and pale skin and even as beings who were shining with light (“shining ones”?). Certainly, the image above depicts them as beautiful, red, blonde or golden-haired, god-like beings, much like the 4th density Nordics so often described in UFO encounters.
However, the fact that the Tuatha de Danann are associated with red, or flame-haired (orange) giants makes me think not only of descriptions of the Nephilim giants but also of the infamous STS Orions. So, could the Tuatha Dé Danann be connected to the Ennead or the Council of Nine? Intriguingly, the C’s may have offered a possible confirmation of this in the session dated 7 October 1995:
A: Orange is reference to hair colour.
And to this day, the Irish and Scottish peoples (Gaels), scattered around the world, have some of the highest concentrations of red-haired people on the planet, who are usually very pale skinned, having blue or green eyes. Could this be a legacy of the Tuatha de Danann?
In an exchange on the Alton Towers thread on 29 August 2022 (see Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians | Page 52 | Cassiopaea Forum), Bluegazer made what may be a very astute comment about the Tuatha de Danann in rection to what I had said here:
MJF said:In an exchange on the Alton Towers thread on 29 August 2022 (see Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians | Page 52 | Cassiopaea Forum), Bluegazer made what may be a very astute comment about the Tuatha de Danann in rection to what I had said here:
"As an Irish Celt myself, having a propensity towards Haemochromatosis, an inherited condition where iron levels in the body slowly build up over many years, these findings are very revealing. Could the original Celtic settlers in Ireland (as opposed to the later Milesian Gaels from Spain) have been the Scythian Celts that became the Tuatha de Danaan, i.e., Danaans or Danites [the Tribe of Dan?] arriving from the Land of Canaan or the Sinai Desert? If so, were they the scaled-down hybrid descendants of the subterranean Antareans? Indeed, could red hair and fair, sandy freckled skin be their calling card?"
Bluegazer said:
"Maybe that's the property that makes them bi-density?
I think Bluegazer makes a good point here. The link between these high concentrations of iron in the body (especially the brain) and people having special abilities may be magnetite, judging from what the C’s have said in the transcripts:
Session dated 7 June 1997:
Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts ate a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination?
A: Trichinosis used to be non-existent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this.
Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichonosis, and the Aryans were not?
A: Originally.
Q: So, it was necessary for the Jews not to eat the pork, but not for the Aryans, and the mixing caused susceptibility. In a general sense, are strong Aryan genetics indicative of the necessity for the consumption of meat?
A: In a sense, but pescadorial features substitute semi-adequately.
Q: Pescadorial. Semi-adequately. What needed to be added so that the substitution would be not just semi-adequate, but totally adequate?
A: Iron/protein levels.
Q: So, it is the iron that the Celts need? Well, that brings me to the next question: In all the Celtic folklore when they talk about 'fairies,' which are obviously other density beings very similar to our modern 'Gray alien,' these fairy/slash aliens insist that no iron come near them in any way. It was also said that bringing iron into contact with someone thought to be a 'changeling' would prove whether or not they were because if they were, they would disappear instantly. Also, the instructions for the building of the Temple of Solomon included restrictions on the use of iron in either the preparation of the materials or the putting together of the building itself, even down to the rejection of the use of iron nails in any part. What is the significance of this restriction on the use of iron by these other density beings, whoever they are?
A: Bloodline trails.
Q: Are you saying that... I don't understand... not even well enough to frame another question...
A: You will, my dear, oh will you! [MJF: This seems to be a reference to the upcoming realm border crossing, which will facilitate the movement of an as yet unknown number of people to 4th density.]
Q: If it was necessary for the Aryans to have iron... okay, maybe the iron is something that interacts...
A: What about iron as an element?
Q: Okay, let's see: {consults dictionary} Iron –derived from early Celt 'iserno,' via Illyrian 'eisarno' from the IndoEuropean base 'eis,' which means to 'move vigorously; strong, holy.' It is a white, malleable, ductile, metallic chemical element that can be readily magnetized, rusts rapidly in moist or salty air, and is vital to plant and animal life; it is the most common and important of all metals, and its alloys, as steel, are extensively used. Symbol: Fe; atomic weight: 55.847; atomic number: 26; specific gravity: 7.86; melting point: 1535 degrees Centigrade; boiling point 3,000 degrees C. The electron shells are thus: 2,14,8,2. Iron is an element of blood, hemoglobin, and is easily magnetized... there is some new work about iron and magnetite in the brains of people who are psychic or have 'abduction' experiences... is it the magnetism?
A: Yes....
Q: Is it something that holds one more firmly in 3rd density, and the elimination of it enables one to switch densities... or...
A: Tis magnetite that acts as a conduit, and perhaps, just perhaps, allows for transference back and forth at will?!? [MJF: Teleportation] And what about the legend about the alchemists? Is not the key term there really transformation?!? And has not the "smoke screen" really been delivered so effectively by all the concentration upon the substance?!? And does not this remind one indeed of all the misguided concentration upon substance rather than meaning that one finds so regularly on 3rd density??
Q: I get it! So, it is the magnetite in the body, that collects and holds the charge, and it has absolutely nothing to do with an external substance at all! Is that it?
A: You are getting "warmer."
Q: Am I right, we need more iron for magnetite, or am I completely off base here?
A: You are right, but, do not underestimate the significance of that just delivered! What better deception than to divert the meaning of alchemy, by focusing upon substance, then addicting those souls bound to 3rd density to the substance?
And again in the session dated 5 December 1998:
Q: So, when you said 'template, Templar,' you were possibly referring to the fact that what was going on here, the constructions, the name and word clues, and even the events and incidents may have been a model that we should look for in other places?
A: Temples too.
Q: What is the...
A: What is behind your temples?
Q: Behind, in a general sense? The creators, the instigators? The church?
A: Place your fingers upon...
Q: What do you put your fingers on that has to do with a temple? Place your fingers on your temple? On your head? What is behind your temple? Your brain...
A: Which part?
Q: Well, the TEMPORAL lobe... the part of the brain where magnetite is found.
A: Yes....
Q: So, what are you getting at here?
A: We are not, you will.
Q: So, the instructions or clues found in this place, may, in fact, apply to some other location? Is that it?
A: Or to a grid.
Q: Was Saunier aware of this grid?
A: It is not important, the grid is.
And the grid the C’s are referring to is, of course, the worldwide electromagnetic grid that shrouds the Earth, which can be utilised by those who know how.
Ongoing Involvement of the Council of Nine
As Wikipedia notes: “The concept of a divine assembly (or council) is attested in the archaic Sumerian, Akkadian, Old Babylonian, Ancient Egyptian, Babylonian, Canaanite, Israelite, Celtic, Ancient Greek and Ancient Roman and Nordic pantheons. The testimony of these ancient cultures is important, because ancient myths often have a kernel of truth in them”.
And, as we have seen, stories of emperors, kings and pharaohs consulting a pantheon of nine gods can be found in virtually every major ancient culture across the globe.
We must therefore ask whether it is purely coincidence that so many ancient cultures separated by thousands of miles all worshiped a group of nine main gods? Could there really be an intergalactic Council of Nine secretly working behind the scenes, dictating the course of humanity?
Coming back to Star Trek once again, Gene Roddenberry may have been hinting at such a thing in an episode from the original Star Trek show called "Assignment: Earth", which featured a character called Gary Seven. In that episode, whilst engaged in historical research, the USS Enterprise travels back through time to the year 1968 where they encounter an interstellar agent planning to intervene in 20th-century events. Seven turns out to be a human who was raised on a distant planet by an alien super race to be an agent (time traveller) who would help to guide important human events. Indeed, the concept was reprised only last year in an episode from one of the latest Star Trek spin-off shows ‘Picard’. In an episode called Fly me to the Moon, Jean-Luc Picard meets a character called Tallinn in the year 2024 who states that she too was recruited by superior beings to be a supervisor, like Gary Seven, in order protect the tapestry of human history.
And, as we have seen, stories of emperors, kings and pharaohs consulting a pantheon of nine gods can be found in virtually every major ancient culture across the globe.
We must therefore ask whether it is purely coincidence that so many ancient cultures separated by thousands of miles all worshiped a group of nine main gods? Could there really be an intergalactic Council of Nine secretly working behind the scenes, dictating the course of humanity?
Coming back to Star Trek once again, Gene Roddenberry may have been hinting at such a thing in an episode from the original Star Trek show called "Assignment: Earth", which featured a character called Gary Seven. In that episode, whilst engaged in historical research, the USS Enterprise travels back through time to the year 1968 where they encounter an interstellar agent planning to intervene in 20th-century events. Seven turns out to be a human who was raised on a distant planet by an alien super race to be an agent (time traveller) who would help to guide important human events. Indeed, the concept was reprised only last year in an episode from one of the latest Star Trek spin-off shows ‘Picard’. In an episode called Fly me to the Moon, Jean-Luc Picard meets a character called Tallinn in the year 2024 who states that she too was recruited by superior beings to be a supervisor, like Gary Seven, in order protect the tapestry of human history.
Could there be any evidence of the involvement of ET agents like the fictional Gary Seven in modern times? The answer is possibly.
The Strange Case of Valiant Thor
Valiant Thor [MJF: an interesting name given the myth of the Norse Ennead] was supposedly a delegate of the "High Council" (the Council of Nine?) who was granted VIP status at the Pentagon from 1957 to 1960 in order to discuss concerns of the Cold War, leading up to the Cuban Missile Crisis. A book by Frank Stranges (1927-2008) called Stranger at the Pentagon (published in 1967), supported by the testimony of Harley Andrew Byrd [allegedly a nephew of Admiral Richard Byrd of ‘Operation High Jump’ fame], gave an account of Thor’s mission to Earth.
In mid-March of 1957 in Alexandria, Virginia, a policeman witnessed a UFO landing in a field. A tall white man emerged from the craft and approached the officer, calmly identifying himself as Valiant Thor, sent by "The High Council". He requested that he might speak with President Eisenhower. The policeman immediately contacted his superiors, who relayed the stranger’s request to the Pentagon. Soon, agents of the National Security Service arrived at the landing site of the alien ship. They took the man to the Pentagon where he introduced himself as Valiant Thor. That day, he made fun of the entire Pentagon security system. He easily bypassed it, using only telekinesis. Thor also used telepathy to communicate with the commander of the US Navy. He was then introduced to Secretary of Defense, Charles Wilson. He eventually got to speak with Eisenhower, Richard Nixon the Vice-President, and other joint chiefs.
According to Frank Stranges, Thor was given a three-year VIP status at the Pentagon, where he conducted numerous meetings with persons of high influence in the United States government. His objective was to voice the concerns of the "High Council" over the way humanity was evolving – in particular, its apparent lust for nuclear weaponry.
In mid-March of 1957 in Alexandria, Virginia, a policeman witnessed a UFO landing in a field. A tall white man emerged from the craft and approached the officer, calmly identifying himself as Valiant Thor, sent by "The High Council". He requested that he might speak with President Eisenhower. The policeman immediately contacted his superiors, who relayed the stranger’s request to the Pentagon. Soon, agents of the National Security Service arrived at the landing site of the alien ship. They took the man to the Pentagon where he introduced himself as Valiant Thor. That day, he made fun of the entire Pentagon security system. He easily bypassed it, using only telekinesis. Thor also used telepathy to communicate with the commander of the US Navy. He was then introduced to Secretary of Defense, Charles Wilson. He eventually got to speak with Eisenhower, Richard Nixon the Vice-President, and other joint chiefs.
According to Frank Stranges, Thor was given a three-year VIP status at the Pentagon, where he conducted numerous meetings with persons of high influence in the United States government. His objective was to voice the concerns of the "High Council" over the way humanity was evolving – in particular, its apparent lust for nuclear weaponry.
According to Frank E. Stranges, Eisenhower asked Thor where he was from, to which Thor gave a rather cryptic response: "the morning and the evening star". Below is the alleged dialogue exchange provided by Stranges:
Eisenhower: "Please, sir, what is your name? And where do you come from?"
Thor: "I come from the planet your Bible calls the morning and the evening star."
Eisenhower: "Venus?"
Thor: "Yes, sir."
Eisenhower: "Can you prove this?"
Thor: "What do you constitute as proof?"
Eisenhower: "I don’t know."
According to Thor, Venusians live inside Venus. Externally Val appeared human, albeit with six fingers and six toes [MJF: thus, reminiscent of the Nephilim]. Internally, his heart was larger, and he only had one, much larger lung. His blood vessels were larger and carried hemocyanin-based blood. His brain capacity was 300 cm3 and he claimed to have an IQ of 1200, although anything over 200 loses definite meaning. Supposedly, he could speak 100 languages fluently.
An alleged photograph of Valiant Thor
It should be noted here that Frank Stranges was a writer-preacher, who was engaged in the study of UFOs. He claimed that in 1958 he had got his hands on pictures of an alien from Venus. He presented them as real proof of the existence of other civilisations at sermons in evangelistic centres. At one of these meetings, Stranges alleged that he was approached by a Pentagon employee and offered to meet Thor personally.
Valiant said that he flew to the planet Earth from Venus on the ship “Victor-1”. At home, he is a member of the “Council-12” [MJF: this sounds more reminiscent of Majestic 12 than the Council of Nine]. Representatives of other worlds often turn to him for help. He helps to find solutions to their problems. Therefore, Thor is sometimes sent to different parts of the Universe, but his main task is to maintain order in the Milky Way. He came to Earth in order to deal with the problem of increasing stocks of nuclear weapons, which in the event of a war can lead to a catastrophe of universal scale.
Thor allegedly handed President Eisenhower a recording of the High Council leaders’ address. They offered earthlings access to new technologies and help in spiritual development in exchange for stopping the production of nuclear weapons. However, the president could not persuade the generals in charge of national defence to stop developing new weapons.
According to Dr. Strange, Thor was about 180 cm tall and about 85 kg in weight. His skin was tanned, and his brown hair was slightly curled. His eyes were brown. There were no prints on the alien’s fingers or palms. Thor had no navel. Valiant said he was 490 years old. He had the ability to appear and disappear at will. It seems he could take apart the structure of his body at the molecular level and assemble it elsewhere [MJF: which we know is a capability of 4th density beings].
One can quite easily adopt a sceptical stance to this tale and dismiss the story as a complete hoax, as many in fact do (see for example: Valiant Thor: Your Friendly Pentagon Alien (skeptoid.com)). There are certainly very good grounds for viewing both Byrd and Stranges as conmen and fantasists, seeking publicity from their stories. Indeed, one can immediately recognise the Valiant Thor story as a copy of the plot of the classic 1951 sci-fi movie The Day the Earth Stood Still (see: The Day the Earth Stood Still - Wikipedia), which was remade in 2008. The 1951 movie had a plot involving a humanoid alien visitor who comes to Earth, accompanied by a powerful robot, to deliver an important message that will affect the entire human race. The message he wished to deliver was that of people from other more advanced planetary societies who were concerned with the Earth's possible aggression, now that humanity had developed rockets and rudimentary atomic power. We might also recall that Admiral Richard Byrd had said that the beings who had summoned him to a meeting with them, which had taken place within the Inner Earth, had done so after the atomic bombs of World War II had awakened their interest in surface humans.
However, before dismissing the story out of hand, it is worth noting that President Eisenhower was alleged to have met with more than one set of aliens during the 1950’s (including the Pleiadians) and many ufologists allege that he signed a treaty with one group of them (most probably the Greys), which has come to be own as the “Grenada Agreement”. This treaty is harder to dismiss since the C’s have supported the existence of such a treaty and confirmed that the Greys had broken it immediately after it was signed. It would take the US government over nineteen years to discover this fact:
Session 9 October 1994:Valiant said that he flew to the planet Earth from Venus on the ship “Victor-1”. At home, he is a member of the “Council-12” [MJF: this sounds more reminiscent of Majestic 12 than the Council of Nine]. Representatives of other worlds often turn to him for help. He helps to find solutions to their problems. Therefore, Thor is sometimes sent to different parts of the Universe, but his main task is to maintain order in the Milky Way. He came to Earth in order to deal with the problem of increasing stocks of nuclear weapons, which in the event of a war can lead to a catastrophe of universal scale.
Thor allegedly handed President Eisenhower a recording of the High Council leaders’ address. They offered earthlings access to new technologies and help in spiritual development in exchange for stopping the production of nuclear weapons. However, the president could not persuade the generals in charge of national defence to stop developing new weapons.
According to Dr. Strange, Thor was about 180 cm tall and about 85 kg in weight. His skin was tanned, and his brown hair was slightly curled. His eyes were brown. There were no prints on the alien’s fingers or palms. Thor had no navel. Valiant said he was 490 years old. He had the ability to appear and disappear at will. It seems he could take apart the structure of his body at the molecular level and assemble it elsewhere [MJF: which we know is a capability of 4th density beings].
One can quite easily adopt a sceptical stance to this tale and dismiss the story as a complete hoax, as many in fact do (see for example: Valiant Thor: Your Friendly Pentagon Alien (skeptoid.com)). There are certainly very good grounds for viewing both Byrd and Stranges as conmen and fantasists, seeking publicity from their stories. Indeed, one can immediately recognise the Valiant Thor story as a copy of the plot of the classic 1951 sci-fi movie The Day the Earth Stood Still (see: The Day the Earth Stood Still - Wikipedia), which was remade in 2008. The 1951 movie had a plot involving a humanoid alien visitor who comes to Earth, accompanied by a powerful robot, to deliver an important message that will affect the entire human race. The message he wished to deliver was that of people from other more advanced planetary societies who were concerned with the Earth's possible aggression, now that humanity had developed rockets and rudimentary atomic power. We might also recall that Admiral Richard Byrd had said that the beings who had summoned him to a meeting with them, which had taken place within the Inner Earth, had done so after the atomic bombs of World War II had awakened their interest in surface humans.
However, before dismissing the story out of hand, it is worth noting that President Eisenhower was alleged to have met with more than one set of aliens during the 1950’s (including the Pleiadians) and many ufologists allege that he signed a treaty with one group of them (most probably the Greys), which has come to be own as the “Grenada Agreement”. This treaty is harder to dismiss since the C’s have supported the existence of such a treaty and confirmed that the Greys had broken it immediately after it was signed. It would take the US government over nineteen years to discover this fact:
Q: (L) Does the government have or did they ever have a treaty with any aliens?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is the treaty still in effect?
A: Never was.
Q: (L) Did they try to get a treaty with them?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Did the aliens refuse?
A: No. Tricked.
Q: (L) How long before the U.S. government realized they had been tricked?
A: 19 years.
Q: (L) What year was this?
A: 1972. [MJF: Hence, this would suggest the treaty was signed in 1953] Richard Nixon was the President of the USA in 1972 and he had been Eisenhower’s vice-president in 1953. The famous Hollywood comedian Jackie Gleason, who was a friend and golfing partner of Nixon, confirmed that Nixon had a strong interest in UFOs and aliens. For more see: The Nixon-Gleason Alien Account And Other Presidential UFO Secrets - UFO Insight]
I am minded to think that the Valiant Thor story, at least as described by Stranges, is a hoax but it could still have been based on a similar event that may have happened at some stage in the 1950’s, which subsequently leaked out through a process of Chinese whispers. By the late 1960’s it was known that Venus was a hellhole of a planet. Hence, it makes sense that Stranges should suggest that Thor’s civilisation had lived within the planet. Moreover, the C’s have confirmed that there are 3rd and 4th density beings who dwell within the Earth, so why should Venus be any different. Furthermore, we learned above that Ra, a 6th density being, claimed to have come from Venus, a planet the C’s told us was originally an ancient wanderer from near the star Arcturus:
A: 19 years.
Q: (L) What year was this?
A: 1972. [MJF: Hence, this would suggest the treaty was signed in 1953] Richard Nixon was the President of the USA in 1972 and he had been Eisenhower’s vice-president in 1953. The famous Hollywood comedian Jackie Gleason, who was a friend and golfing partner of Nixon, confirmed that Nixon had a strong interest in UFOs and aliens. For more see: The Nixon-Gleason Alien Account And Other Presidential UFO Secrets - UFO Insight]
I am minded to think that the Valiant Thor story, at least as described by Stranges, is a hoax but it could still have been based on a similar event that may have happened at some stage in the 1950’s, which subsequently leaked out through a process of Chinese whispers. By the late 1960’s it was known that Venus was a hellhole of a planet. Hence, it makes sense that Stranges should suggest that Thor’s civilisation had lived within the planet. Moreover, the C’s have confirmed that there are 3rd and 4th density beings who dwell within the Earth, so why should Venus be any different. Furthermore, we learned above that Ra, a 6th density being, claimed to have come from Venus, a planet the C’s told us was originally an ancient wanderer from near the star Arcturus:
Q: (L) Where was Venus originally from?
A: Ancient wanderer from near Arcturus.
It could be that a 4th density being (a Nordic) like Valiant Thor did perhaps approach the US government in the 1950’s, as a representative of an advanced civilisation, over concerns about what was then the very real prospect of a nuclear war on Earth. However, if they did so, I would suggest that it is more likely they came from one of the inner Earth civilisations rather than from Venus. I would not completely rule out either that such a representative could have come from the Council of Nine.
Eisenhower’s great granddaughter, Laura Eisenhower, doesn’t doubt that any of these meetings went ahead. When she was asked about her great-grandfather’s experience, she stated that these meetings took place against a backdrop of a world that most of us don’t realise existed. She states that the Second World War was still being fought behind-the-scenes, and that such things as ‘Operation Paperclip’ were just a part of that scenario. She also cited the Admiral Richard Byrd and his apparent battle with “Nazi UFOs” in Antarctica [MJF: which the C’s confirmed did take place - A: Yes, but he was led to believe he was chasing what amounted to merely an encampment of detached Nazis]. Quoting Eisenhower:
Eisenhower’s great granddaughter, Laura Eisenhower, doesn’t doubt that any of these meetings went ahead. When she was asked about her great-grandfather’s experience, she stated that these meetings took place against a backdrop of a world that most of us don’t realise existed. She states that the Second World War was still being fought behind-the-scenes, and that such things as ‘Operation Paperclip’ were just a part of that scenario. She also cited the Admiral Richard Byrd and his apparent battle with “Nazi UFOs” in Antarctica [MJF: which the C’s confirmed did take place - A: Yes, but he was led to believe he was chasing what amounted to merely an encampment of detached Nazis]. Quoting Eisenhower:
“It’s like there is this whole other reality going on that we don’t hear about!” she stated, “These timelines and the deeper history connected to secret societies, connected to these deeper ET agendas that have been around for thousands of years!”
I certainly agree with those comments and would ask whether the deeper ET agendas she refers to include those of the Council of Nine?
For more on this subject see: The Eisenhower Alien Meetings Are "Just The Tip Of The Iceberg!" - UFO Insight
Well, I have read the last two posts here about the council of nine, the council of Zendar. And also the last posts of the last session of April 8 of this year. A couple of things caught my attention. One is this Neormm thing and perpendicular realities.
This session of April 29, 1995 brought with it the concept of perpendicular realities and subsequently the concept of the group of seven individuals:
Here the point is to see that for a perpendicular reality that number of individuals is required. The C's indicate 7 as optimal. While for Zendar it is 9. Perhaps the number is not as important (yet) as the fact that this council of nine by their association with each other constitutes exactly a perpendicular reality.
Several questions and observations arise from this. If they are 6th density entities, by their mere condition per se they can be said to be powerful, but if indeed, an association of such entities forming a perpendicular reality, what is really their scope?
Is it possible that Neormm is located in the rings of Saturn? Is Neormm, the STS perpendicular reality of these beings?
This session of April 29, 1995 brought with it the concept of perpendicular realities and subsequently the concept of the group of seven individuals:
Here the point is to see that for a perpendicular reality that number of individuals is required. The C's indicate 7 as optimal. While for Zendar it is 9. Perhaps the number is not as important (yet) as the fact that this council of nine by their association with each other constitutes exactly a perpendicular reality.
Several questions and observations arise from this. If they are 6th density entities, by their mere condition per se they can be said to be powerful, but if indeed, an association of such entities forming a perpendicular reality, what is really their scope?
Is it possible that Neormm is located in the rings of Saturn? Is Neormm, the STS perpendicular reality of these beings?
I apologise for being out of touch for so long. Partly this was down to my eldest son making a rare visit to stay with me. He is a fascinating character and it is always good to catch up with the zeitgeist through mixing with the younger generation. However, the main reason for taking so long to post is that I have been researching a subject which to some extent flowed out of my post on the Ennead. This then led me to write a lengthy article on Abraham/Moses and the Exodus, which seek to corroborate as much of the Cassiopaeans comments on this subject as I could manage.
For those not familiar with the subject matter, I hope it will be enlightening. I must add that I have not read Laura's book The Horns of Moses yet, so it is possible I may be duplicating things Laura has already said on the topic. I have mainly relied on authors who have formed the view that Moses and the Exodus occurred on or around the time of the eruption of Thera and therefore place the Biblical Exodus during the 18th dynasty period in Egyptian history, especially the reigns of Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaten. The article also tries to link Abraham/Moses with the Trojans, who in my view may have survived and emigrated to Eastern Anatolia and merged with the Hittites. As always, the article is intended to be thought provoking, so comments are welcome.
I do intend to catch up with responses to others' posts and to post more material on existing themes such as the various societies or groups the 19th Century Rosicrucians may have hidden behind. This finally involves discovering a genuine link between Lewis Carroll and the Orphic Circle. As usual, I quote my sources, so you are welcome to search these out yourselves.
For those not familiar with the subject matter, I hope it will be enlightening. I must add that I have not read Laura's book The Horns of Moses yet, so it is possible I may be duplicating things Laura has already said on the topic. I have mainly relied on authors who have formed the view that Moses and the Exodus occurred on or around the time of the eruption of Thera and therefore place the Biblical Exodus during the 18th dynasty period in Egyptian history, especially the reigns of Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaten. The article also tries to link Abraham/Moses with the Trojans, who in my view may have survived and emigrated to Eastern Anatolia and merged with the Hittites. As always, the article is intended to be thought provoking, so comments are welcome.
I do intend to catch up with responses to others' posts and to post more material on existing themes such as the various societies or groups the 19th Century Rosicrucians may have hidden behind. This finally involves discovering a genuine link between Lewis Carroll and the Orphic Circle. As usual, I quote my sources, so you are welcome to search these out yourselves.
Abraham, Moses, Akhenaten, Meritaten and the Cassiopaeans
Session dated 16 October 1994:
Q: (L) Where did Moses get his knowledge?
A: Us. [6th Density]
Session 7 October 1994:
Q: (L) Who was Yahweh.
A: Fictional being.
Q: (L) Who was the god that spoke to Moses on the mount?
A: Audible projection of Lizards.
Q: (L) Did Moses at any time realize that he had been duped by the Lizzies?
A: No.
Q: (L) Yet, the other night you said that Moses is also doing work with Christ on another plane, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, if he was misled by the Lizzies, how did he get to be a good guy?
A: Taught afterward
Q: (L) After what?
A: Plane transfer.
Q: (L) Did Moses die?
A: No.
Q: (L) Who took him?
A: Us.
Q: (L) What is the origin of the Kaballah?
A: Channelled truths given to early pre-Mosaic Jews to use your terminology.
Q: (L) When the Jewish commentators began setting down the teachings, was this the first time this had been put into writing?
A: No. Not even close.
Was it the C’s, another 6th density group or the Ennead who these early pre-Mosaic Jews channelled? We know from the Old Testament that the Levites were a priesthood who carried and protected the Ark of the Covenant:
Q: Who were the Levites?
A: Sect of monk-like pacifists. Connected to Moses.
Session 20 August 2001:
Q: All right, first question is, what is the origin of the Levites?
A: Hittites Moon Worshippers.
Q: Well, before the Hittites became Hittites, what were they?
A: Indo-europeans.
Q: What was the source of the Indo-europeans?
A: Aryan sub-race. Q: Is there any other group the Aryans mixed with to produce the Indo-Europeans?
A: Fourth Density genetic tweak.
Q: Was Abraham a Levite?
A: Yes.
Q: Was Sarah Nefertiti?
A: Yes.
Q What was the reason for the strange skull shape of Nefertiti and her family?
A: Genetic tweak.
Q: Was this 4th density genetic tweak done by STS or STO?
A: STS
Q: If the Levites were the Hittite Moon worshipers, how come Akhenaten, who hung out with Nefertiti, instituted Sun worship? That doesn't make sense.
A: Future Ho into.
Q: Future what into? A: Ho.
Q: HO must stand for something. I don't understand. Was Nefertiti responsible for Akhenaten's Sun worship?
A: Mostly.
Q: Well why did it turn into Sun worship instead of Moon worship?
A: Future honour of Ra. Go 353535. Deity.
Q: So in other words they were laying a foundation for future layering of other concepts?
A: Yes.
Q: Was the Temple on Crete at Knossos, was it really a necropolis as Wunderlich suggests?
A: 5th density waiting room.
Q: Did they sacrifice humans there?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they sacrifice animals?
A: Yes.
Q: What animals were they sacrificing, and to whom?
A: Apis Bull in part.
Q: What was the other part?
A: Haho 353535
Q: "Ho" must be a name. Is Ho a name of a god?
A: HOH 353535
Q: (T) Is it water? (L) Is it like Hawah? (A) HOH water?
A: Remember Irish pig.
The Gaels, Scythians and Scota
“In ancient times Scota the daughter of Pharaoh left Egypt with her husband Gayel by name and a large following. For they had heard of disasters which were going to come upon Egypt, and so through instructions or oracular responses of the gods they fled from certain plagues that were to come. They took to the sea entrusting themselves to the guidance of their gods. After sailing in this was for many days overs the seas with troubled minds, they were finally glad to put in at a certain shore because of bad weather.”
Meritaten and Smenkhkare
Meritaten’s Revenge on Smenkhkare
Q: (L) Well, it seems that Nefertiti disappeared from history in the 12th year of the reign of Akhenaten. He then died in the 17th year of his reign. If Nefertiti was Sarah, where was she during this five year period, if Akhenaten died going after her when Abraham/Moses carried her off?
A: Locked up.
Q: (L) So, Nefertiti is Sarah and Abraham came and rescued her somehow, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: (L) You mentioned before that Helen/Nefertiti/Sarah was locked up by Akhenaten. Why, specifically, was she locked up?
A: He became unable to function and the action was taken by others.
Q: (L) Did Akhenaten go mad as I have surmised?
A: Pretty much
Q: What happened to Akhenaten? He also brought about the monotheistic worship and was apparently so hated that any mention of him, his very name, was stricken from buildings and statuary; his tomb was defaced and there was tremendous turmoil in the land. He essentially disappeared from the landscape, erased by the people who must have really hated him. What was the deal with Akhenaten?
A: Is not that enough? Must one endure anymore?
Q: Endure anymore what?
A: Vilification.
Moses and the Blood Covenant
Q: At the making of the Covenant at Mt. Sinai, there was a bunch of sacrificed animals, and Moses took the blood, dividing it in half, he cast one half on the altar. Taking the book of the covenant, he read it to the people, and they said 'we will observe all that Yahweh has decreed. We will obey.' And then Moses took the blood and cast it on the people saying 'this is the blood of the covenant that Yahweh has made with you containing all these rules.' What is this blood of the covenant?
A: Has to do with bloodline.
Q: So this symbolized the bloodline of the Jews?
A: No.
Q: What bloodline are we talking about here?
A: Aramaic/Aryan.
Q: Is the god worshipped in Judaism, Yahweh, really Howah, the Pig God?
A: Yes.
The C’s commented on the real meaning of the tetragrammaton in the session dated 16 September 1995:
Q: (RC) The Tetragrammaton, which is a code for the name of God in the Old Testament, who or what does this code represent?
A: Be careful not to get caught up in ancient deceptions, but ostensibly it "means" I Am The One.
Q: (L) Who were the Elohim of the Bible?
A: Transdefinitive. And variable entities. [...] First manifestation was human, then non-human. [...]
Q: (L) Well, what brought about their transformation from human to non-human?
A: Pact or covenant.
Q: (L) They made a pact or covenant with each other?
A: No, with 4th density STS.
Q: (L) Well, that is not good! Are you saying that the Elohim are STS? Who were these STS beings they made a pact with?
A: Rosteem, now manifests as Rosicrucians.
(L) Okay, now about the Pig God: what is it about pigs that makes them ideal as a symbol for the manifestation of God energy, or even as a vehicle?
A: Genetically manipulated RU 353535.
Q: (L) What does that code relate to?
A: Race underpinning tribal code structure.
Q: (L) Are you suggesting that some codon of human DNA that relates to a "tribal code structure" was spliced into an animal?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Why an animal and not a human being? Is it because the STS energy is so contractile that a pig is an appropriate receptacle?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) That's bizarre.
Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts ate a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination?
A: Trichinosis used to be non-existent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this.
Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichinosis*, and the Aryans were not?
A: Originally.
Q: So, it was necessary for the Jews not to eat the pork, but not for the Aryans, and the mixing caused susceptibility.
*Trichinosis, also known as trichinellosis, is a parasitic disease caused by roundworms of the Trichinella type.
Akhenaten and Sun Worship
However, the C’s have also told us that Nefertiti was more than just a large skulled hybrid for she also seems to have been what they referred to as a ‘Deep Level Punctuator’:
Q: Was Sarah Nefertiti [a Levite]?
A: Yes.
Q What was the reason for the strange skull shape of Nefertiti and her family?
A: Genetic tweak.
Q: Was this 4th density genetic tweak done by STS or STO?
A: STS
Session 2 February 2003:
L) Once before we discussed Nefertiti and Sarah being one and the same person. We have now been discussing the idea, based on some significant clues in ancient documents, that this individual was also Helen of Troy. Is this, in fact, a useful idea to follow? Is it a correct assessment of the clues?
A: Indeed!
Session 17 August 2003:
A: The lines blur. Rothschilds are similar in a smaller way to Sargon. Deep level punctuator.
Q: (L) What is a deep level punctuator?
A: One who emerges from seeming obscurity to "make a mark" on history. Don't you wonder where they come from. Think "deep."
Q: As in underground bases?
A: Well, what a concept!
Q: (L) Is this where Helen came from?
A: Yes
As to the religion of Atenism, quoting from Wikipedia:
Session 20 August 2001:
Q: Was the explosion of Thera the cataclysmic story later added to the Exodus?
A: Yes.
Q: Did the Mediterranean Sea part?
A: No.
Q: Did this happen at the same time as when Abraham was fleeing from Akhenaten, hauling off his wife Nefertiti/Sarah?
A: Yes.
Q: What happened to Akhenaten?
A: Drowned in the Nile.
Session 23 August 2001:
Q: If Akhenaten pursued Abraham and Sarah at the time of the eruption of Thera, did it happen that the waters of the Nile withdrew and then slammed back and hit him?
A: In part.
Q: So the disruption upset the Nile. It made it turbulent, or overflow, or dangerous in some sense?
A: Yes. Q: (L) Now, I have a little problem with my writing. First of all, did the eruption of Thera occur in 1627 BC or thereabouts?
A: Close.
Q: (L) What stimulated the eruption of Thera?
A: Venus.
{Here I think that "Venus" is a code for the giant comet described by Victor Clube}
Q: (L) Well, about 40 years after that there was the comet cluster, in 1588 BC, correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, it seems that Nefertiti disappeared from history in the 12th year of the reign of Akhenaten. He then died in the 17th year of his reign. If Nefertiti was Sarah, where was she during this five year period, if Akhenaten died going after her when Abraham/Moses carried her off?
A: Locked up.
Q: (L) So, Nefertiti is Sarah and Abraham came and rescued her somehow, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And that happened at the time of the passage of the comet cluster, between 1627 BC and 1588 BC - dramatic events which is what enabled that particular drama to take place...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So Abraham retrieved Sarah and Akhenaten went after them and drowned in the river or something?
A: Close.
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: (L) You mentioned before that Helen/Nefertiti/Sarah was locked up by Akhenaten. Why, specifically, was she locked up?
A: He became unable to function and the action was taken by others. [MJF: Smenkhkare and Kiya perhaps?]
Q: (L) Did Akhenaten go mad as I have surmised?
A: Pretty much.
Q: (L) Did he fall in the Nile and get eaten by a crocodile as the story about one pharaoh suggests?
A: No Crocodile.
Q: So, he just fell in and drowned?
A: More like he was "helped."
Q: (L) Sounds to me like this poor guy was just a patsy all around.
A: Yup.
Q: The story about the plague that is told in Manetho, was this a plague as in leprosy, a disease, or something else?
A: It was multiple elements including leprosy.
Q: (L) What were these different elements?
A: Consider the writings about cometary showers.
In my previous article, I looked at the possible influence of a Council of nine gods or advanced alien beings who the Egyptians referred to as the Ennead (The Nine), for whom the Pharaoh of Egypt acted as the main point of contact. We saw that a similar group of nine entities also interacted with other peoples and cultures all over the ancient world, at different periods in time. However, these entities (if indeed they were the same group of beings) were not the only aliens or higher dimensional beings who seem to have been in contact with human kings or key figures in antiquity since we know that the Cassiopaeans were in direct contact with Abraham/Moses and possibly with his contemporary, Pharaoh Akhenaten too:
Session dated 16 October 1994:
Q: (L) Where did Moses get his knowledge?
A: Us. [6th Density]
The C’s did not tell us when their communications with Moses began and what was the method of communication, e.g., direct channelling. We know at some point though, probably on Mount Sinai where he received the Ten Commandments, that Moses was misled by the Lizard beings holding themselves out as Yahweh, the monotheistic deity of the Israelites:
Session 7 October 1994:
Q: (L) Who was Yahweh.
A: Fictional being.
Q: (L) Who was the god that spoke to Moses on the mount?
A: Audible projection of Lizards.
Q: (L) Did Moses at any time realize that he had been duped by the Lizzies?
A: No.
Q: (L) Yet, the other night you said that Moses is also doing work with Christ on another plane, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, if he was misled by the Lizzies, how did he get to be a good guy?
A: Taught afterward
Q: (L) After what?
A: Plane transfer.
Q: (L) Did Moses die?
A: No.
Q: (L) Who took him?
A: Us.
Elsewhere the C’s told us that they had taken Moses to this other plane after he had been deposed as the Israelites’ leader due to his increasingly tyrannical behaviour. If Moses was the leader of the Israelites of the Biblical Exodus, who were these Israelites? For those who have studied the Bible, you may recall that “Israel” was the name conferred on the patriarch Jacob by God (Yahweh). Jacob was supposedly Abraham’s grandson by way of Isaac. However, the C’s have told us that the Biblical Jacob was just another persona of Abraham/Moses. Whether the Israelites called themselves by that at the time of the Exodus from Egypt is open to question. The first known written reference to the Israelites is to be found on the so called ‘’Victory Stela’ of the Pharoah Mernptah, which dates to around 1220 B.C. The reference to “Israel” on that Stela is intended as a reference to a tribal group rather than to a place name. By way of contrast, the first reference to Yahweh, the god of the Israelites, is to be found within an inscription on a column in the temple of Soleb in Egypt dating from the reign of Pharaoh Amenhotep III, Akhenaten’s father, more than a century earlier. This inscription reads “Yahweh in the land of the Shasu” (for more on the Shasu, see below). Although the temple’s columns contained an inscribed register of African and Asiatic place names, or toponyms, there was no inscription connected to any place or tribal group calling themselves Israel or the Israelites. So where did the Biblical Israelites come from?
The Cassiopaeans would later confirm that Abraham/Moses was in fact a Hittite and a Levite, a people who would appear to have been a branch of the Indo-European Scythians who had moved into Anatolia (Turkey), Mesopotamia. and much of the modern Middle East during the second millennium B.C. The C’s also confirmed that Abraham’s wife Sarah was in fact Nefertiti, the foreign born Queen of Pharaoh Akhenaten, and she too was a Hittite and Levite (see below). This means that if Moses/Abraham was raised and educated in the Egyptian court, as maintained by the Hebrew Bible, he would of necessity have had close dealings with the Pharoah of that period who was Amenhotep III, the father of Akhenaten and Nefertiti’s father-in-law.
If the C’s were communicating with Moses/Abraham, this in turn begs the question who provided the information to the pre-Mosaic Jews (Hittites/Levites/Celts?) which formed the original Kabbalah:
The Cassiopaeans would later confirm that Abraham/Moses was in fact a Hittite and a Levite, a people who would appear to have been a branch of the Indo-European Scythians who had moved into Anatolia (Turkey), Mesopotamia. and much of the modern Middle East during the second millennium B.C. The C’s also confirmed that Abraham’s wife Sarah was in fact Nefertiti, the foreign born Queen of Pharaoh Akhenaten, and she too was a Hittite and Levite (see below). This means that if Moses/Abraham was raised and educated in the Egyptian court, as maintained by the Hebrew Bible, he would of necessity have had close dealings with the Pharoah of that period who was Amenhotep III, the father of Akhenaten and Nefertiti’s father-in-law.
If the C’s were communicating with Moses/Abraham, this in turn begs the question who provided the information to the pre-Mosaic Jews (Hittites/Levites/Celts?) which formed the original Kabbalah:
Q: (L) What is the origin of the Kaballah?
A: Channelled truths given to early pre-Mosaic Jews to use your terminology.
Q: (L) When the Jewish commentators began setting down the teachings, was this the first time this had been put into writing?
A: No. Not even close.
Was it the C’s, another 6th density group or the Ennead who these early pre-Mosaic Jews channelled? We know from the Old Testament that the Levites were a priesthood who carried and protected the Ark of the Covenant:
Q: Who were the Levites?
A: Sect of monk-like pacifists. Connected to Moses.
The above answer suggests that they may have been a monastic group that existed even before the events described in the Biblical account of Moses and the Exodus.
We also know that the Hittite/Levites (members of the Tribe of Levi) were originally moon worshippers who became sun worshippers presumably in Egypt:
We also know that the Hittite/Levites (members of the Tribe of Levi) were originally moon worshippers who became sun worshippers presumably in Egypt:
Session 20 August 2001:
Q: All right, first question is, what is the origin of the Levites?
A: Hittites Moon Worshippers.
Q: Well, before the Hittites became Hittites, what were they?
A: Indo-europeans.
Q: What was the source of the Indo-europeans?
A: Aryan sub-race. Q: Is there any other group the Aryans mixed with to produce the Indo-Europeans?
A: Fourth Density genetic tweak.
Q: Was Abraham a Levite?
A: Yes.
Q: Was Sarah Nefertiti?
A: Yes.
Q What was the reason for the strange skull shape of Nefertiti and her family?
A: Genetic tweak.
Q: Was this 4th density genetic tweak done by STS or STO?
A: STS
Q: If the Levites were the Hittite Moon worshipers, how come Akhenaten, who hung out with Nefertiti, instituted Sun worship? That doesn't make sense.
A: Future Ho into.
Q: Future what into? A: Ho.
Q: HO must stand for something. I don't understand. Was Nefertiti responsible for Akhenaten's Sun worship?
A: Mostly.
Q: Well why did it turn into Sun worship instead of Moon worship?
A: Future honour of Ra. Go 353535. Deity.
Q: So in other words they were laying a foundation for future layering of other concepts?
A: Yes.
Q: Was the Temple on Crete at Knossos, was it really a necropolis as Wunderlich suggests?
A: 5th density waiting room.
Q: Did they sacrifice humans there?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they sacrifice animals?
A: Yes.
Q: What animals were they sacrificing, and to whom?
A: Apis Bull in part.
Q: What was the other part?
A: Haho 353535
Q: "Ho" must be a name. Is Ho a name of a god?
A: HOH 353535
Q: (T) Is it water? (L) Is it like Hawah? (A) HOH water?
A: Remember Irish pig.
The Gaels, Scythians and Scota
That last reference to the Irish pig god, Howah, links us with the Gaels (Goidels) or the Milesians (i.e., sons of Míl) who had originally sailed to Ireland from Iberia (Spain) after supposedly spending hundreds of years travelling around. From there the Gaels would subsequently migrate and settle in Scotland. Indeed, the 1320 Declaration of Arbroath, which made the case for Scottish independence from England, directly claimed that the Scots were Scythians. Is there anything to support this? Well, the Lebor Gabála Érenn (The Book of the Taking of Ireland), an Irish work which was first compiled in the 11th century AD by an anonymous writer, purports to be a history of Ireland and the Irish (i.e., the Gaels). Fénius, a Prince of Scythia, is described as one of 72 chieftains (MJF: there is that special number 72 again!) who apparently built the Tower of Babel.
Fénius’s son Nel wed Scota (from whom the Scoti tribe or branch of the Gaels, now known as the Scots or Scottish, derive their name), the daughter of an Egyptian pharaoh, and they had son named Goídel Glas. Goídel's offspring, the Goidels (or Gaels), left Egypt supposedly at the same time as the Exodus of the Israelites and settled in Scythia (N.B. Pontic Scythia, was a kingdom created by the Scythians during the 6th to 3rd centuries BC in the Pontic–Caspian steppe but the timing does not seem to be confirmatory in this case since the Gaels would start to migrate to Ireland circa 600 BC, i.e. before the Scythians set up shop in the Pontic-Caspian steppe). After some time, they would leave Scythia and spend 440 years wandering the Earth, undergoing a series of trials and tribulations akin to those of the Israelites, who were said to have spent 40 years wandering in the wilderness. Eventually, Míl and his followers reached Iberia by sea and conquered it. There, Goídel's descendant Breogán founded a city called Brigantia, and built a tower from the top of which his son Íth glimpses Ireland (MJF: Physically impossible of course). Brigantia refers to Corunna (then known as Brigantium) in modern-day Galicia in Spain (MJF: which could establish a possible link to the Brigantes or Briganti tribe of Northern Britain). Subsequently the Gaels would conquer and settle Ireland after defeating the fabled Tuatha Dé Danann (MJF: who may have had their own connection with the Council of Nine or the Ennead), i.e., “the folk of the goddess Danu", who are also known by the earlier name Tuath Dé ("tribe of the gods"). Modern scholars believe that the tale of Mil is mostly an invention of medieval Irish Christian writers. They sought to link the Irish to people and events from the Old Testament, to liken the Irish to the Israelites (rather like the British Israelite movement), and to reconcile native pagan myth with Christianity. However, recent DNA analysis does in fact show that modern-day Irish people are closely related to northern Iberians (Galicians). This would therefore suggest that there is definitely some truth to this Goidelic/Scythian link via northern Spain and the Galicians.
I have recently also come across a Scottish source with an equivalent account of the legend of Scota. This is the Scottichrnicon, a chronicle of the peoples of Scotland written in the 1440’s by the Abbott Walter Bower who drew on much older sources including Eusebius of Caesarea and the 9th Century British monk Nennius. The main character of this version of the Scota story is Prince Gaythelos (or Gayel which obviously links us with the Gaels and the Scoti) who in one of the kingdoms of Greece (which may mean northern Europe if we follow Iman Wilkens lead on the true location of Troy) failed to attain a position of authority in his father’s land, which resulted in him becoming angry and committing acts of great barbarity and cruelty, so much so that he was driven out of his native land and ended up in Egypt, where he leant his services to Pharaoh and helped him to expel an army of Ethiopians from the kingdom. In gratitude, he is offered Pharoah’s daughter, Scota, in marriage. The story is set at the time of the Exodus and when Pharaoh and his army pursue the Israelites out if Egypt he is drowned. Since Scota was meant to be Pharaoh’s only daughter, this gave Gaythelos the opportunity to seize the country. However, aware of Gaythelos’s reputation for cruelty, the Egyptians forced him and his wife to leave Egypt. Bower quoting Robert Grosseteste (and earlier 13th Century source verbatim tells us:
Fénius’s son Nel wed Scota (from whom the Scoti tribe or branch of the Gaels, now known as the Scots or Scottish, derive their name), the daughter of an Egyptian pharaoh, and they had son named Goídel Glas. Goídel's offspring, the Goidels (or Gaels), left Egypt supposedly at the same time as the Exodus of the Israelites and settled in Scythia (N.B. Pontic Scythia, was a kingdom created by the Scythians during the 6th to 3rd centuries BC in the Pontic–Caspian steppe but the timing does not seem to be confirmatory in this case since the Gaels would start to migrate to Ireland circa 600 BC, i.e. before the Scythians set up shop in the Pontic-Caspian steppe). After some time, they would leave Scythia and spend 440 years wandering the Earth, undergoing a series of trials and tribulations akin to those of the Israelites, who were said to have spent 40 years wandering in the wilderness. Eventually, Míl and his followers reached Iberia by sea and conquered it. There, Goídel's descendant Breogán founded a city called Brigantia, and built a tower from the top of which his son Íth glimpses Ireland (MJF: Physically impossible of course). Brigantia refers to Corunna (then known as Brigantium) in modern-day Galicia in Spain (MJF: which could establish a possible link to the Brigantes or Briganti tribe of Northern Britain). Subsequently the Gaels would conquer and settle Ireland after defeating the fabled Tuatha Dé Danann (MJF: who may have had their own connection with the Council of Nine or the Ennead), i.e., “the folk of the goddess Danu", who are also known by the earlier name Tuath Dé ("tribe of the gods"). Modern scholars believe that the tale of Mil is mostly an invention of medieval Irish Christian writers. They sought to link the Irish to people and events from the Old Testament, to liken the Irish to the Israelites (rather like the British Israelite movement), and to reconcile native pagan myth with Christianity. However, recent DNA analysis does in fact show that modern-day Irish people are closely related to northern Iberians (Galicians). This would therefore suggest that there is definitely some truth to this Goidelic/Scythian link via northern Spain and the Galicians.
I have recently also come across a Scottish source with an equivalent account of the legend of Scota. This is the Scottichrnicon, a chronicle of the peoples of Scotland written in the 1440’s by the Abbott Walter Bower who drew on much older sources including Eusebius of Caesarea and the 9th Century British monk Nennius. The main character of this version of the Scota story is Prince Gaythelos (or Gayel which obviously links us with the Gaels and the Scoti) who in one of the kingdoms of Greece (which may mean northern Europe if we follow Iman Wilkens lead on the true location of Troy) failed to attain a position of authority in his father’s land, which resulted in him becoming angry and committing acts of great barbarity and cruelty, so much so that he was driven out of his native land and ended up in Egypt, where he leant his services to Pharaoh and helped him to expel an army of Ethiopians from the kingdom. In gratitude, he is offered Pharoah’s daughter, Scota, in marriage. The story is set at the time of the Exodus and when Pharaoh and his army pursue the Israelites out if Egypt he is drowned. Since Scota was meant to be Pharaoh’s only daughter, this gave Gaythelos the opportunity to seize the country. However, aware of Gaythelos’s reputation for cruelty, the Egyptians forced him and his wife to leave Egypt. Bower quoting Robert Grosseteste (and earlier 13th Century source verbatim tells us:
“In ancient times Scota the daughter of Pharaoh left Egypt with her husband Gayel by name and a large following. For they had heard of disasters which were going to come upon Egypt, and so through instructions or oracular responses of the gods they fled from certain plagues that were to come. They took to the sea entrusting themselves to the guidance of their gods. After sailing in this was for many days overs the seas with troubled minds, they were finally glad to put in at a certain shore because of bad weather.”
That shore was supposedly Spain (or it could have been Samylia in Caria, Anatolia – see more below on this) where they built the town of Brigantia (MJF: linking Scota to Brigid). Subsequently, two of Scota’s sons, Hiber and Hymec depart for Hibernia (Ireland), which they then colonise. We should note in particular here the references to instructions or oracular responses from the gods, suggesting 4th or 6th density assistance, and the mention of plagues, which may link us to the Biblical plagues of Egypt. We certainly know from historical records that an unprecedented plague was rampant in Egypt and much of the Middle East at the end of Akhenaten’s reign (see also the section on the Ipuwer Papyrus below).
There are evidently strong parallels between these two accounts and other Irish versions of the Scota story involving Mil. Curiously, Scota is said to have brought the Stone of Scone (sedile regium) with her from Egypt, on which King Charles III was recently crowned at Westminster Abbey. Was this Jacob’s Pillar or is the Stone of Scone really a cypher for the Holy Grail? In Nennius’s version of the legend, he tells us that when the Egyptians drowned in the Red Sea in pursuit of the Israelites, there was present a powerful ‘nobleman of Scythia’ called Gaythelos. The surviving Egyptians (which may mean Ay and General Horemheb etc.) took counsel to expel him, lest he attack and seize control of Egypt. This suggests that Gaythelos was a man of power who was to be feared. Supposedly Gaythelos and his wife Scotia then wandered for 42 years until they landed on the coast of Spain. We see again here a link via Gaythelos to Scythia and the Scythians who, as stated above, were an Indo-European Semitic speaking race, mostly probably Celts. Could these Scythians have been Hittites, otherwise known as the Hatti?
The above seems to be a very distorted recounting of the story of Abraham/Moses, a Prince of Scythia (Gaythelos or Nel) and his Egyptian consort Meritaten/Hagar, the daughter of Pharaoh Akhenaten. Moses is, of course, supposed to have wandered with the people of Israel for 40 years in the wilderness of Sinai. However, although we know that Abraham/Moses stayed in the Middle East until he was deposed as the Israelites’ leader (see above), these stories do link Scota with Spain and Ireland. If Scota is really Princess Meritaten and Hagar, as I suspect, these accounts suggest that she may have gone to Spain (possibly southern France too) before ending up in the British Isles, perhaps in Ireland first and then subsequently northern Britain or Scotland. If so, could she have brought the Holy Grail with her? Did she remain there or was she (and the Grail) retrieved by the persons the C’s called the Dragon Slayers?
In this regard, it should be noted that Scota is specifically said to be the daughter of a pharaoh who drowned in the Red Sea at the time of the Exodus and this pharaoh is named as ‘Chencres’. This accords with what the C’s said about Akhenaten being drowned (murdered) in the Nile. However, Bower seems to have used an unknown version of the Egyptian historian Manetho’s Epitome (see more on Manetho later), which tells us that Chencres (who Manetho called Acencris or Acencheres) ruled for eighteen years and was then succeeded by his son Achorisis who ruled for seven years. Clearly Chencres and Achorisis are Akhenaten and Tutankhamun, who reigned for seventeen and eight years respectively.
Meritaten/HagarThere are evidently strong parallels between these two accounts and other Irish versions of the Scota story involving Mil. Curiously, Scota is said to have brought the Stone of Scone (sedile regium) with her from Egypt, on which King Charles III was recently crowned at Westminster Abbey. Was this Jacob’s Pillar or is the Stone of Scone really a cypher for the Holy Grail? In Nennius’s version of the legend, he tells us that when the Egyptians drowned in the Red Sea in pursuit of the Israelites, there was present a powerful ‘nobleman of Scythia’ called Gaythelos. The surviving Egyptians (which may mean Ay and General Horemheb etc.) took counsel to expel him, lest he attack and seize control of Egypt. This suggests that Gaythelos was a man of power who was to be feared. Supposedly Gaythelos and his wife Scotia then wandered for 42 years until they landed on the coast of Spain. We see again here a link via Gaythelos to Scythia and the Scythians who, as stated above, were an Indo-European Semitic speaking race, mostly probably Celts. Could these Scythians have been Hittites, otherwise known as the Hatti?
The above seems to be a very distorted recounting of the story of Abraham/Moses, a Prince of Scythia (Gaythelos or Nel) and his Egyptian consort Meritaten/Hagar, the daughter of Pharaoh Akhenaten. Moses is, of course, supposed to have wandered with the people of Israel for 40 years in the wilderness of Sinai. However, although we know that Abraham/Moses stayed in the Middle East until he was deposed as the Israelites’ leader (see above), these stories do link Scota with Spain and Ireland. If Scota is really Princess Meritaten and Hagar, as I suspect, these accounts suggest that she may have gone to Spain (possibly southern France too) before ending up in the British Isles, perhaps in Ireland first and then subsequently northern Britain or Scotland. If so, could she have brought the Holy Grail with her? Did she remain there or was she (and the Grail) retrieved by the persons the C’s called the Dragon Slayers?
In this regard, it should be noted that Scota is specifically said to be the daughter of a pharaoh who drowned in the Red Sea at the time of the Exodus and this pharaoh is named as ‘Chencres’. This accords with what the C’s said about Akhenaten being drowned (murdered) in the Nile. However, Bower seems to have used an unknown version of the Egyptian historian Manetho’s Epitome (see more on Manetho later), which tells us that Chencres (who Manetho called Acencris or Acencheres) ruled for eighteen years and was then succeeded by his son Achorisis who ruled for seven years. Clearly Chencres and Achorisis are Akhenaten and Tutankhamun, who reigned for seventeen and eight years respectively.
In earlier posts, I have laid out the case for the Biblical Hagar the Egyptian, who the C’s say was an Egyptian princess, to have been Meritaten, the eldest of Akhenaten’s six known daughters. Given her titles and prominent royal roles, as depicted in surviving murals and illustrations of the Amarna royal family, she seems to have been very close to her father Akhenaten (letters written to Akhenaten from foreign rulers make reference, for example, to Meritaten as "mistress of the house"). However, promoting this case is not without its difficulties, particularly since the C’s have told us that this individual was at one stage the last living member of the Perseid family, who are meant to have been descendants of the mythical Greek hero Perseus, the legendary founder of Mycenae and the Perseid dynasty. Perseus famously slew the Gorgon, Medusa and cut off her head, which may in my view be a cypher for the Holy Grail, which may in turn be the mysterious pure crystal skull referred to as ‘Baphomet’ by the Knights Templar. The C’s have recently told us that Perseus was a mythic character and was not based on a real person, although the ancient Greeks certainly considered him to be an authentic historical figure. However, the Perseid family was certainly real and strongly connected to the city of Mycenae. Hence, we may be looking at the same sort of foundation myth that connected Rome’s founding to the legendary twins Romulus and Remus.
Mycenae developed into a major power during the Late Bronze Age (c. 1550 – c. 1450 BC) and is believed to have become the main centre of the Aegean civilisation through the fifteenth century to the extent that the two hundred years from c. 1400 BC to c. 1200 BC are known as the Mycenaean Age. Hence, it was a major Mediterranean mercantile power during Egypt’s 18th dynasty. However, Mycenae would be among the numerous Aegean sites destroyed as part of the Bronze Age Collapse around 1200 BC. The causes of these destructions are unknown, although I would suggest that the Biblical plagues that struck Egypt and much of the Eastern Mediterranean in the Late Bronze Age may have played a major part in triggering this collapse (see more on this later).
In the temple built within the Mycenae’s citadel, a scarab of Queen Tiye of Egypt, who was married to Pharaoh Amenhotep III, was placed in the Room of the Idols. Amenhotep III’s marriage to Tiye had been celebrated by the issue of commemorative scarabs, announcing Tiye as the ‘Great Royal Wife’ and giving the names of her parents. Although the scarab may have simply been a royal gift from one monarch to another, the fact that it was placed in a prominent room in Mycenae’s main temple, may suggest that Queen Tiye and her family had strong connections to Mycenae. If true, this could explain how the Perseid line may have passed down to Meritaten via Queen Tiye, as she was Akhenaten’s mother and Meritaten’s paternal grandmother. In this regard, Egyptologists have suggested that Tiye's father, Yuya, was of foreign origin due to the features of his mummy and the many different spellings of his name, which might imply that it was a non-Egyptian name in origin. Some Egyptologists suggest that the queen's strong political and unconventional religious views might have been due not just to a strong character, but to her foreign descent.
If Meritaten was the last living member of the Perseid family, we should note that at the time of Akhenaten’s death, her brother Tutankhamun was still alive as was her sister Ankhesenamun, who married her brother Tutankhamun to become the ‘Great Royal Wife’ and Queen. Meritiaten and Ankhesenamun may have been the only surviving daughters of Akhenaten by that time since the others had either died in childbirth (Meketaten) or from plague. Egyptologists think Ankhesenamun probably died during or shortly after Ay’s reign (Tutankhamun’s successor) and no burial has been found for her yet. This does not rule her out from being Kore/Hagar but given Tutankhamun reigned for nearly nine years and Ay for nearly four years, this means that she was still alive and based in Egypt for perhaps up to fourteen or more years after her father Akhenaten’s death, which was meant to coincide with Abraham/Moses and Nefertiti/Sarah’s flight from Egypt into the Sinai Desert. She could perhaps have joined them at some later date but then the same is equally true of her older sister Meritaten. So, what is known of Meritaten in this same period?
Mycenae developed into a major power during the Late Bronze Age (c. 1550 – c. 1450 BC) and is believed to have become the main centre of the Aegean civilisation through the fifteenth century to the extent that the two hundred years from c. 1400 BC to c. 1200 BC are known as the Mycenaean Age. Hence, it was a major Mediterranean mercantile power during Egypt’s 18th dynasty. However, Mycenae would be among the numerous Aegean sites destroyed as part of the Bronze Age Collapse around 1200 BC. The causes of these destructions are unknown, although I would suggest that the Biblical plagues that struck Egypt and much of the Eastern Mediterranean in the Late Bronze Age may have played a major part in triggering this collapse (see more on this later).
In the temple built within the Mycenae’s citadel, a scarab of Queen Tiye of Egypt, who was married to Pharaoh Amenhotep III, was placed in the Room of the Idols. Amenhotep III’s marriage to Tiye had been celebrated by the issue of commemorative scarabs, announcing Tiye as the ‘Great Royal Wife’ and giving the names of her parents. Although the scarab may have simply been a royal gift from one monarch to another, the fact that it was placed in a prominent room in Mycenae’s main temple, may suggest that Queen Tiye and her family had strong connections to Mycenae. If true, this could explain how the Perseid line may have passed down to Meritaten via Queen Tiye, as she was Akhenaten’s mother and Meritaten’s paternal grandmother. In this regard, Egyptologists have suggested that Tiye's father, Yuya, was of foreign origin due to the features of his mummy and the many different spellings of his name, which might imply that it was a non-Egyptian name in origin. Some Egyptologists suggest that the queen's strong political and unconventional religious views might have been due not just to a strong character, but to her foreign descent.
If Meritaten was the last living member of the Perseid family, we should note that at the time of Akhenaten’s death, her brother Tutankhamun was still alive as was her sister Ankhesenamun, who married her brother Tutankhamun to become the ‘Great Royal Wife’ and Queen. Meritiaten and Ankhesenamun may have been the only surviving daughters of Akhenaten by that time since the others had either died in childbirth (Meketaten) or from plague. Egyptologists think Ankhesenamun probably died during or shortly after Ay’s reign (Tutankhamun’s successor) and no burial has been found for her yet. This does not rule her out from being Kore/Hagar but given Tutankhamun reigned for nearly nine years and Ay for nearly four years, this means that she was still alive and based in Egypt for perhaps up to fourteen or more years after her father Akhenaten’s death, which was meant to coincide with Abraham/Moses and Nefertiti/Sarah’s flight from Egypt into the Sinai Desert. She could perhaps have joined them at some later date but then the same is equally true of her older sister Meritaten. So, what is known of Meritaten in this same period?
Meritaten and Smenkhkare
Well for one thing, like her mother before her and her younger sister after her, she was at one stage Queen of Egypt through her marriage to a mysterious figure called Smenkhkare, a pharaoh of unknown background and origin, who lived and ruled during the late Amarna Period. It is assumed he was a member of the royal family, possibly either a brother or son of the Pharaoh Akhenaten. There are few artifacts that attest to his existence at all, and so it is assumed his reign must have been short. A wine docket from "the house of Smenkhkare" attests to Regnal Year 1. A second wine docket dated to Year 1 refers to him as "Smenkhkare, (deceased)" and may indicate that he died during his first regnal year. Clear evidence for a sole reign for Smenkhkare has not yet been found. Some Egyptologists therefore suggest that Smenkhkare did not have a sole reign of his own and served merely as Akhenaten's co-regent for about a year around Akhenaten’s Regnal Year 13. Moreover, an inscription on a honey jar docket discovered at Amarna shows that Tutankhamun’s reign commenced in the same year that his father’s ended. Likewise, a wine docket also found at the site, which is dated to the first year of Tutankhamun’s reign, is inscribed with the words “wine from the estate of Smenkhkare, deceased”, which shows that Smenkhkare was already dead.
It should be noted here that there are few records surviving for the Amarna Period, which was one of chaos and confusion, so it is extremely difficult today to determine who was ruling and when. The Amarna Period was subsequently subject to a large-scale condemnation of memory by later Pharaohs (Horemheb would, as Pharoah, go so far as to backdate his reign to have it commence directly after Amenhotep III’s), hence many records of the period were destroyed or excised. If Smenkhkare outlived Akhenaten, and became sole pharaoh, he likely ruled Egypt for less than a year. However, as stated above, clear evidence for a sole reign for Smenkhkare has not yet been found so he may have predeceased Akhenten. As to his lineage, theories propose that Smenkhkare could have been a younger brother of Akhenaten by another mother or the son of Akhenaten's older brother, Thutmose, and an unknown woman or possibly even Tutankhamun’s brother, whether by Nefertiti or another woman - including perhaps Nefertiti’s sister Mutnodjme, who later married General Horemheb to become his Great Queen when Horemheb became pharaoh, or Kiya, Akhenaten’s second wife. For reasons given below, I tend to favour Kiya.
The location of Smenkhkare's burial is unconfirmed. He has, however, been put forward as a strong candidate for the mummy discovered in the famous KV55 tomb found in the Valley of the Kings in 1907, which rested in a desecrated coffin with the owner’s name removed. It is generally accepted that the coffin was originally intended for a female and later reworked to accommodate a male. Over the past century, the chief candidates for this unknown individual have been either Akhenaten or Smenkhkare. The case for Smenkhkare comes mostly from the presumed age of the mummy which, because it is between the ages 18 and 26 (more recent analysis in 1998 has reduced this down to between 18-23), would not fit Akhenaten who reigned for 17 years and would therefore have been in his thirty’s when he died. Moreover, seriological tests published in Nature in 1974 indicated that the KV55 mummy and Tutankhamun shared the same rare blood type (MJF: could this be the hybrid Nefertiti’s blood type or Akhenaten’s?). This information led Egyptologists to conclude that the KV55 mummy was either the father or brother of Tutankhamun. A brother seemed the more likely option since the age of the mummy would only be old enough to plausibly father a child at the upper extremes. We should also note here that when famed Egyptologist Howard Carter discovered Tutankhamun’s tomb in 1924, many of the precious artefacts he found appeared to have belonged to Smenkhkare. Indeed, even the famous golden image of Tutankhamun from the lid of his second coffin was most likely that of Smenkhkare, since Dr, J. Kidd a medical artist at the Faculty of Medicine at Liverpool University in England when making a facial reconstruction of the skull of the mummy in Tomb KV55, found to his surprise that it bore a striking resemblance to the face of Tutankhamun, as depicted on the second coffin lid.
Graham Phillips in his book Act of God poses the question of who may have been responsible for desecrating the mummy in Tomb KV55 and looting its funerary goods in order to furnish Tutankhamun’s tomb. One obvious candidate may have been Tutankhamun himself or someone acting on his behalf. However, after careful analysis he reached the rather startling conclusion that it was none other than his royal wife Meritaten. But why?
It should be noted here that there are few records surviving for the Amarna Period, which was one of chaos and confusion, so it is extremely difficult today to determine who was ruling and when. The Amarna Period was subsequently subject to a large-scale condemnation of memory by later Pharaohs (Horemheb would, as Pharoah, go so far as to backdate his reign to have it commence directly after Amenhotep III’s), hence many records of the period were destroyed or excised. If Smenkhkare outlived Akhenaten, and became sole pharaoh, he likely ruled Egypt for less than a year. However, as stated above, clear evidence for a sole reign for Smenkhkare has not yet been found so he may have predeceased Akhenten. As to his lineage, theories propose that Smenkhkare could have been a younger brother of Akhenaten by another mother or the son of Akhenaten's older brother, Thutmose, and an unknown woman or possibly even Tutankhamun’s brother, whether by Nefertiti or another woman - including perhaps Nefertiti’s sister Mutnodjme, who later married General Horemheb to become his Great Queen when Horemheb became pharaoh, or Kiya, Akhenaten’s second wife. For reasons given below, I tend to favour Kiya.
The location of Smenkhkare's burial is unconfirmed. He has, however, been put forward as a strong candidate for the mummy discovered in the famous KV55 tomb found in the Valley of the Kings in 1907, which rested in a desecrated coffin with the owner’s name removed. It is generally accepted that the coffin was originally intended for a female and later reworked to accommodate a male. Over the past century, the chief candidates for this unknown individual have been either Akhenaten or Smenkhkare. The case for Smenkhkare comes mostly from the presumed age of the mummy which, because it is between the ages 18 and 26 (more recent analysis in 1998 has reduced this down to between 18-23), would not fit Akhenaten who reigned for 17 years and would therefore have been in his thirty’s when he died. Moreover, seriological tests published in Nature in 1974 indicated that the KV55 mummy and Tutankhamun shared the same rare blood type (MJF: could this be the hybrid Nefertiti’s blood type or Akhenaten’s?). This information led Egyptologists to conclude that the KV55 mummy was either the father or brother of Tutankhamun. A brother seemed the more likely option since the age of the mummy would only be old enough to plausibly father a child at the upper extremes. We should also note here that when famed Egyptologist Howard Carter discovered Tutankhamun’s tomb in 1924, many of the precious artefacts he found appeared to have belonged to Smenkhkare. Indeed, even the famous golden image of Tutankhamun from the lid of his second coffin was most likely that of Smenkhkare, since Dr, J. Kidd a medical artist at the Faculty of Medicine at Liverpool University in England when making a facial reconstruction of the skull of the mummy in Tomb KV55, found to his surprise that it bore a striking resemblance to the face of Tutankhamun, as depicted on the second coffin lid.
Graham Phillips in his book Act of God poses the question of who may have been responsible for desecrating the mummy in Tomb KV55 and looting its funerary goods in order to furnish Tutankhamun’s tomb. One obvious candidate may have been Tutankhamun himself or someone acting on his behalf. However, after careful analysis he reached the rather startling conclusion that it was none other than his royal wife Meritaten. But why?
Meritaten’s Revenge on Smenkhkare
Phillips puts forward a complex argument for Meritaten’s guilt that includes the mistaken notion that Queen Nefertiti may have died in year 14 of Akhenaten’s reign, the same year his mother Queen Tiye had died. We know from the C’s that this was not the case for she had been locked up for the last five years of his reign:
Q: (L) Well, it seems that Nefertiti disappeared from history in the 12th year of the reign of Akhenaten. He then died in the 17th year of his reign. If Nefertiti was Sarah, where was she during this five year period, if Akhenaten died going after her when Abraham/Moses carried her off?
A: Locked up.
Q: (L) So, Nefertiti is Sarah and Abraham came and rescued her somehow, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: (L) You mentioned before that Helen/Nefertiti/Sarah was locked up by Akhenaten. Why, specifically, was she locked up?
A: He became unable to function and the action was taken by others.
Q: (L) Did Akhenaten go mad as I have surmised?
A: Pretty much
Phillips paints a picture that upon his wife’s death the once vigorous Akhenaten seems to have lost all interest in promoting his new Atenist religion and even relinquished the reins of power with Smenkhkare being appointed co-regent with full pharaonic power. There was no palace revolt or military coup just chronic apathy on Akhenaten’s part. As Phillip’s points out, there is abundant evidence from Amarnan art that Akhenaten was an extraordinarily emotional man who dearly loved his family and doted over his queen. The sudden loss of his mother, two daughters and now his beloved queen within just a year or so, most likely to plague, must have been too much for such a man to bear. This sad state of mind may also be implied by what the C’s said about him here:
Q: What happened to Akhenaten? He also brought about the monotheistic worship and was apparently so hated that any mention of him, his very name, was stricken from buildings and statuary; his tomb was defaced and there was tremendous turmoil in the land. He essentially disappeared from the landscape, erased by the people who must have really hated him. What was the deal with Akhenaten?
A: Is not that enough? Must one endure anymore?
Q: Endure anymore what?
A: Vilification.
Phillips adds that with Nefertiti gone [i.e., out the way], and the Pharoah’s apparent withdrawal from rule, the drama then shifted increasingly to Akhenaten’s eldest daughter Meritaten and ultimately to what appears to have been a bitter power struggle. As we saw above, foreign correspondence described her as “the mistress of your house”, implying that she had assumed the role of ‘Great Royal Wife’ or ‘Chief Queen’. There is evidence that Meritaten may have been opposed in taking over from Nefertiti by Akhenaten’s second wife Kiya. Phillips points out that Kiya not only enjoyed far greater privileges than most pharaoh’s secondary wives but that her standing at court continued to grow. A talatat (a limestone brick) discovered at Hermopolis in 1939 was found to have originally come from buildings at Amarna and showed Kiya functioning in an important capacity in the Great Temple as the king’s ‘favourite’. Thus, Meritaten had good reason to see Kiya as a power rival. However, other Hermopolis Talatat showing the royal family at a religious service, with Nefertiti absent, shows Akhenaten’s surviving daughters and Kiya present, but Kiya is both behind and on a lower level than the princesses, which clearly indicates their superior status. Phillip’s paints the case that once Meritaten’s husband became co-regent with her father, she used her position as Chief Queen to wage a vendetta against Kiya by excising her name from inscriptions and defacing her representations. The last we hear of Kiya is in Regnal Year 16 of Akhenaten’s reign suggesting that she may not have survived long after Akhenaten’s death. But, significantly, Kiya may be a crucial figure in the mystery of Tomb KV55 for it seems to have been for her that the funerary or burial effects found in the tomb were initially made.
Phillips then puts forward evidence to show that late in Akhenaten’s reign Meritaten and Smenkhkare appeared to have embraced Atenism with a fanatical zeal, persecuting those who failed to convert to the new religion. Phillips argues that by way of contrast, there is nothing to suggest that Akhenaten, who had apparently all but lost interest in the world by that stage, had become more of a hardliner. Indeed, Phillips argues that it was Meritaten who had become the major hardliner since he points out that an inscription in the tomb of a man called Pairi at Thebes, dated ‘Year 3’ of Smenkhkare’s co-regency, tells us that Smenkhkare had a funerary temple in the city. For Phillips this means that by the third year of his reign Smenkhkare had abandoned Amarna and returned to Thebes, had died and was entombed probably in the Valley of the Kings. More importantly from our perspective, the inscription also refers to divine offerings being made to Amun-Re at Smenkhkare’s temple, meaning he had tried to reinstate the old religion. This therefore implicates Meritaten as the prime mover in the wave of contemporaneous anti-Amun desecrations. Phillips even asks whether Meritaten had come to believe that her father had become demoniacally possessed by a rival god (perhaps as a result of his uncharacteristic apathetic behaviour or possibly a mental breakdown, as suggested above by the C’s). She may even have attributed it to the god Amun-Re, thus leading to her campaign against his inscriptions. Whatever had transpired between the royal couple, Smenkhkare would seem to have turned back to Amun-Re and had tried to make amends to the former prime deity for his transgressions. However, Phillips makes an important observation here and that is that there is no surviving record of Meritaten’s death. He therefore proposes that Smenkhkare’s return to Thebes and the worship of Amun-Re must presumably have occurred once Meritaten was no longer around to stop him. But was she no longer around because she had already abandoned him for someone else? Whatever the case, Smenkhkare appears to have died within a few months of his return to Thebes to be replaced by his apparent brother Tutankhamun, who was then a mere child of eight.
What really happened to Meritaten?Phillips then puts forward evidence to show that late in Akhenaten’s reign Meritaten and Smenkhkare appeared to have embraced Atenism with a fanatical zeal, persecuting those who failed to convert to the new religion. Phillips argues that by way of contrast, there is nothing to suggest that Akhenaten, who had apparently all but lost interest in the world by that stage, had become more of a hardliner. Indeed, Phillips argues that it was Meritaten who had become the major hardliner since he points out that an inscription in the tomb of a man called Pairi at Thebes, dated ‘Year 3’ of Smenkhkare’s co-regency, tells us that Smenkhkare had a funerary temple in the city. For Phillips this means that by the third year of his reign Smenkhkare had abandoned Amarna and returned to Thebes, had died and was entombed probably in the Valley of the Kings. More importantly from our perspective, the inscription also refers to divine offerings being made to Amun-Re at Smenkhkare’s temple, meaning he had tried to reinstate the old religion. This therefore implicates Meritaten as the prime mover in the wave of contemporaneous anti-Amun desecrations. Phillips even asks whether Meritaten had come to believe that her father had become demoniacally possessed by a rival god (perhaps as a result of his uncharacteristic apathetic behaviour or possibly a mental breakdown, as suggested above by the C’s). She may even have attributed it to the god Amun-Re, thus leading to her campaign against his inscriptions. Whatever had transpired between the royal couple, Smenkhkare would seem to have turned back to Amun-Re and had tried to make amends to the former prime deity for his transgressions. However, Phillips makes an important observation here and that is that there is no surviving record of Meritaten’s death. He therefore proposes that Smenkhkare’s return to Thebes and the worship of Amun-Re must presumably have occurred once Meritaten was no longer around to stop him. But was she no longer around because she had already abandoned him for someone else? Whatever the case, Smenkhkare appears to have died within a few months of his return to Thebes to be replaced by his apparent brother Tutankhamun, who was then a mere child of eight.
Graham Phillips makes out a very interesting case, but the C’s may have provided us with an alternative answer to what became of Princess Meritaten. If she really did display fanatical zeal in promoting the religion of Aten was this because of the powerful influence of her hybrid mother Nefertiti, who the C’s have told us was the main influence on Akhenaten’s switch to Aten worship. Was she more her mother’s daughter than a daddy’s girl? Alternatively, had she by this time already become the consort or lover, and fallen under the influence, of the monotheistic Abraham/Moses, joining him and her mother when they all fled Egypt together with the Ark of the Covenant and Holy Grail, with Pharaoh’s army in hot pursuit? This would certainly explain why there is no record of her death and why a cuckolded, and by this time very sick, Smenkhkare had abandoned Amarna for Thebes? However, there is a possibility that Meritaten already knew Abraham/Moses in another guise and had formed romantic feelings for him as had her mother. That guise may have been as Crown Prince Thutmose, the eldest son of Amenhotep III and Akhenaten’s apparent brother. I will deal with this possibility later in the article but first I want to look at the Biblical Moses and at Akhenaten’s sun or Aten worship in more detail, before moving on to look at Abraham/Moses’ racial roots.
Moses and the Blood Covenant
The point the C’s made about the Hittites, as Indo-Europeans, being part of an Aryan sub-race may also link-up with the origins of the blood covenant made by Moses and the Israelites, as discussed with the C’s in another session:
Q: At the making of the Covenant at Mt. Sinai, there was a bunch of sacrificed animals, and Moses took the blood, dividing it in half, he cast one half on the altar. Taking the book of the covenant, he read it to the people, and they said 'we will observe all that Yahweh has decreed. We will obey.' And then Moses took the blood and cast it on the people saying 'this is the blood of the covenant that Yahweh has made with you containing all these rules.' What is this blood of the covenant?
A: Has to do with bloodline.
Q: So this symbolized the bloodline of the Jews?
A: No.
Q: What bloodline are we talking about here?
A: Aramaic/Aryan.
The reference to the “Future honour of Ra. Go 353535. Deity” brings us back to a potential link with the Council of Nine again and to Ra – Atum. The reference to HO, Haho and HOH would appear to link us to Yahweh (or the Latinised ‘Jehovah’ - who the C’s said was, in reality, a Lizard front), the god of the Hebrews or Israelites, who eventually would become the Jewish people. Indeed, the C’s expressly confirmed that Yahweh was the pig god ‘Howah’ in the session dated 14 September 2001:
Q: Is the god worshipped in Judaism, Yahweh, really Howah, the Pig God?
A: Yes.
Apparently, God, speaking in the first person, gave his name to Moses as ʾehyeh, the grammatical first-person form of hayah / hawah. See: What is the Name of God? (miqlat.org)
The traditional view provides that Yahweh, the name for the God of the Israelites, represents the biblical pronunciation of “YHWH,” the Hebrew name revealed to Moses in the book of Exodus. The name YHWH, consisting of the sequence of consonants Yod, Heh, Waw, and Heh, is known as the tetragrammaton.
The traditional view provides that Yahweh, the name for the God of the Israelites, represents the biblical pronunciation of “YHWH,” the Hebrew name revealed to Moses in the book of Exodus. The name YHWH, consisting of the sequence of consonants Yod, Heh, Waw, and Heh, is known as the tetragrammaton.
The C’s commented on the real meaning of the tetragrammaton in the session dated 16 September 1995:
Q: (RC) The Tetragrammaton, which is a code for the name of God in the Old Testament, who or what does this code represent?
A: Be careful not to get caught up in ancient deceptions, but ostensibly it "means" I Am The One.
After the Babylonian Exile (6th century BC), and especially from the 3rd century BC onwards, Jews ceased to use the name Yahweh for two reasons. As Judaism became a universal rather than merely a local religion, the more common Hebrew noun Elohim (plural in form but understood in the singular), meaning “God,” tended to replace Yahweh to demonstrate the universal sovereignty of Israel’s God over all others. At the same time, the divine name was increasingly regarded as too sacred to be uttered; it was thus replaced vocally in the synagogue ritual by the Hebrew word Adonai (“My Lord”), which was translated as Kyrios (“Lord”) in the Septuagint, the Greek version of the Hebrew Scriptures.
It is curious that the post-Babylonian Exile Jews should switch to using the plural name “Elohim” when you consider who the C’s told us the Elohim really were:
Session dated 7 March 1995:
It is curious that the post-Babylonian Exile Jews should switch to using the plural name “Elohim” when you consider who the C’s told us the Elohim really were:
Session dated 7 March 1995:
Q: (L) Who were the Elohim of the Bible?
A: Transdefinitive. And variable entities. [...] First manifestation was human, then non-human. [...]
Q: (L) Well, what brought about their transformation from human to non-human?
A: Pact or covenant.
Q: (L) They made a pact or covenant with each other?
A: No, with 4th density STS.
Q: (L) Well, that is not good! Are you saying that the Elohim are STS? Who were these STS beings they made a pact with?
A: Rosteem, now manifests as Rosicrucians.
Does this suggest a Rosteem (4th density STS) influence being exercised over the post-Babylonian Exilic Jews? Moreover, what was the nature of this pact or covenant with 4th density STS that brought around the Elohim’s transformation from human to non-human? Could it be in any way related to Abraham/Moses’s blood covenant at Mount Sinai and linked to the Israelites’ (Hittite/Levite) Aramaic/Aryan bloodline and by extension the much earlier Nordic (Aryan) Covenant?
It is also curious that the Jews should have replaced the divine name of God vocally by Adonai (meaning “My Lord”) since that is the name the Ra channel always signed off with in the ‘Law of One’ channelling sessions when saying in “love of Adonai”.
HawahIt is also curious that the Jews should have replaced the divine name of God vocally by Adonai (meaning “My Lord”) since that is the name the Ra channel always signed off with in the ‘Law of One’ channelling sessions when saying in “love of Adonai”.
The reference linking Hawah to the Irish pig god leads us back again to the Gaels, a branch of whom we know became the Scoti or Scots. The Celtic pig god was in fact Moccus, which is cognate with Old Irish mucc, Welsh moch, and Breton moc'h,
Quoting from Wikipedia: The Pig in Ancient Celtic Religion
“MacCulloch highlights the high status and prestige enjoyed by pigs or boars in Celtic cultures, including in religious and mythological contexts:
A cult of a swine-god Moccus has been referred to. The boar was a divine symbol on standards, coins, and altars, and many bronze images of the animal have been found. These were temple treasures, and in one case the boar is three-horned. But it was becoming the symbol of a goddess, as is seen by the altars on which it accompanies a goddess, perhaps of fertility, and by a bronze image of a goddess seated on a boar. The altars occur in Britain, of which the animal may be the emblem—the "Caledonian monster" of Claudian's poem. The swine is esteemed in Ireland, and in the texts monstrous swine are the staple article of famous feasts. These may have been legendary forms of old swine-gods, the feasts recalling sacrificial feasts on their flesh. Magic swine were also the immortal food of the gods. But the boar was tabu to certain persons, e.g., Diarmaid, though whether this is the attenuated memory of a clan totem restriction is uncertain. Bones of the swine, sometimes cremated, have been found in Celtic graves in Britain and at Hallstatt, and in one case the animal was buried alone in a tumulus at Hallstatt, just as sacred animals were buried in Egypt, Greece, and elsewhere. When the animal was buried with the dead, it may have been as a sacrifice to the ghost or to the god of the underworld.
Curiously, Moccus is identified with the Roman deity Mercury, whose Greek equivalent Hermes was associated with fertility in flocks and herds.”
The explanation for why the Celts may have so revered the pig may lie in the role the pig seems to have played, according to the C’s, in the creation of the race which underpinned the genetically manipulated tribal code structure RU 353535:
Quoting from Wikipedia: The Pig in Ancient Celtic Religion
“MacCulloch highlights the high status and prestige enjoyed by pigs or boars in Celtic cultures, including in religious and mythological contexts:
A cult of a swine-god Moccus has been referred to. The boar was a divine symbol on standards, coins, and altars, and many bronze images of the animal have been found. These were temple treasures, and in one case the boar is three-horned. But it was becoming the symbol of a goddess, as is seen by the altars on which it accompanies a goddess, perhaps of fertility, and by a bronze image of a goddess seated on a boar. The altars occur in Britain, of which the animal may be the emblem—the "Caledonian monster" of Claudian's poem. The swine is esteemed in Ireland, and in the texts monstrous swine are the staple article of famous feasts. These may have been legendary forms of old swine-gods, the feasts recalling sacrificial feasts on their flesh. Magic swine were also the immortal food of the gods. But the boar was tabu to certain persons, e.g., Diarmaid, though whether this is the attenuated memory of a clan totem restriction is uncertain. Bones of the swine, sometimes cremated, have been found in Celtic graves in Britain and at Hallstatt, and in one case the animal was buried alone in a tumulus at Hallstatt, just as sacred animals were buried in Egypt, Greece, and elsewhere. When the animal was buried with the dead, it may have been as a sacrifice to the ghost or to the god of the underworld.
Curiously, Moccus is identified with the Roman deity Mercury, whose Greek equivalent Hermes was associated with fertility in flocks and herds.”
The explanation for why the Celts may have so revered the pig may lie in the role the pig seems to have played, according to the C’s, in the creation of the race which underpinned the genetically manipulated tribal code structure RU 353535:
(L) Okay, now about the Pig God: what is it about pigs that makes them ideal as a symbol for the manifestation of God energy, or even as a vehicle?
A: Genetically manipulated RU 353535.
Q: (L) What does that code relate to?
A: Race underpinning tribal code structure.
Q: (L) Are you suggesting that some codon of human DNA that relates to a "tribal code structure" was spliced into an animal?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Why an animal and not a human being? Is it because the STS energy is so contractile that a pig is an appropriate receptacle?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) That's bizarre.
It seems strange to us today that the eating of pork was, and still is, very widespread among Aryans, particularly the Celts, whereas the eating of pork was proscribed by the Jewish faith, but the C’s supplied the following explanation for this:
Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts ate a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination?
A: Trichinosis used to be non-existent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this.
Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichinosis*, and the Aryans were not?
A: Originally.
Q: So, it was necessary for the Jews not to eat the pork, but not for the Aryans, and the mixing caused susceptibility.
*Trichinosis, also known as trichinellosis, is a parasitic disease caused by roundworms of the Trichinella type.
Akhenaten and Sun Worship
The C’s have told us that Akhenaten’s wife Nefertiti was responsible for Akhenaten's switch to sun worship and monotheism even though she, as a Hittite and Levite, should naturally have been a moon worshipper (see more on this below). The C’s explained that the switch was intended to facilitate the future honour of Ra adding “Go 353535. Deity”. Akhenaten was, of course, famous for transforming the religion of Egypt from a polytheistic based one to a monotheistic one through his worship of the Aten or solar disk during what is known as the Amarna Period.
However, the C’s have also told us that Nefertiti was more than just a large skulled hybrid for she also seems to have been what they referred to as a ‘Deep Level Punctuator’:
Q: Was Sarah Nefertiti [a Levite]?
A: Yes.
Q What was the reason for the strange skull shape of Nefertiti and her family?
A: Genetic tweak.
Q: Was this 4th density genetic tweak done by STS or STO?
A: STS
Session 2 February 2003:
L) Once before we discussed Nefertiti and Sarah being one and the same person. We have now been discussing the idea, based on some significant clues in ancient documents, that this individual was also Helen of Troy. Is this, in fact, a useful idea to follow? Is it a correct assessment of the clues?
A: Indeed!
Session 17 August 2003:
A: The lines blur. Rothschilds are similar in a smaller way to Sargon. Deep level punctuator.
Q: (L) What is a deep level punctuator?
A: One who emerges from seeming obscurity to "make a mark" on history. Don't you wonder where they come from. Think "deep."
Q: As in underground bases?
A: Well, what a concept!
Q: (L) Is this where Helen came from?
A: Yes
This clue might therefore mark her out as an agent of the Nation of the Third Eye who may have brought her up to the surface world with a specific mission to perform. Did that mission involve swaying Akhenaten over to monotheism?
As to the religion of Atenism, quoting from Wikipedia:
The word Aten appeared in the Old Kingdom as a noun meaning "disc" which referred to anything flat and circular; the sun was called the "disc of the day" where Ra was thought to reside [MJF: Perhaps Venus would have been closer to the mark given what was said by Ra in the Law of One channellings!] By analogy, the term "silver aten" was sometimes used to refer to the moon. High relief and low relief illustrations of the Aten show it with a curved surface, therefore, the late scholar Hugh Nibley insisted that a more correct translation would be globe, orb or sphere, rather than disk.
The Aten was the disc of the sun and originally an aspect of Ra, the sun god in traditional ancient Egyptian religion. While the Aten was worshiped under the reign of Amenhotep III, it was made the sole deity to receive state and official cult worship under his successor Akhenaten, though archaeological evidence suggests the closing of the state temples of other Egyptian gods likely did not stop household worship of the traditional pantheon. Inscriptions, such as the Great Hymn to the Aten (see more on this below), found in temples and tombs during Akhenaten’s reign showcase the Aten as the creator, giver of life, and nurturing spirit of the world (N.B. a role previously allotted to the creator god Ptah).
Aten does not have a creation myth or family but is mentioned in the Egyptian Book of the Dead. The first known reference to Aten the sun-disk as a deity is in The Story of Sinuhe from the 12th Dynasty, in which the deceased king is described as rising as a god to the heavens and "uniting with the sun-disk, the divine body merging with its maker".
Aten was extensively worshipped as a solar deity during the reign of Amenhotep III where it was depicted as a falcon-headed god like Ra. While Aten was the preeminent creator deity of a pantheon of ancient Egyptian gods under Amenhotep III, it was not until his successor that Aten would be the only god acknowledged via state worship. During the reign of Amenhotep III's successor, Amenhotep IV, the Aten became the sole god of the Egyptian state religion, and Amenhotep IV changed his name to Akhenaten to reflect his close link with the supreme deity. The rays of the sun disk only holds out life to the royal family, and because of this non-royals receive life from Akhenaten and Nefertiti in exchange for loyalty to the Aten. In inscriptions, like the Hymn to the Aten and the King, the Aten is depicted as caring for the people through Akhenaten, placing the royal family as intermediaries for the worship of the Aten.
Akhenaten represented himself as the son of Aten, mirroring many of his predecessors’ claims of divine birth and their positions as the embodiment of Horus. Akhenaten positioned himself as the only intermediary who could speak to Aten, emphasizing the dominance of Aten as the pre-eminent deity. This has led to discussion of whether Atenism should be considered a monotheistic religion, and thus making it one of the first examples of monotheism.
The cult-centre of the Aten was at the capital city Akhenaten founded, Akhetaten, though other cult sites have been found in Thebes and Heliopolis*. In addition to constructing a new capital in honour of Aten, Akhenaten also oversaw the construction of some of the most massive temple complexes of ancient Egypt, including one at Karnak and one at Thebes, close to the old temple of Amun. The use of Amarna as a capital city and religious centre was relatively short lived compared to the 18th Dynasty or New Kingdom as a whole, as it was shortly abandoned after the death of Akhenaten. Inscriptions found on boundary stela accredited to Akhenaten discuss his desire to make the city a place of worship to Aten, dedicating the city to the god and emphasizing the royal residences' efforts in worship. Major principals of the Aten's cult worship were recorded via inscriptions on temples and tombs from the period. Straying significantly from the tradition of ancient Egyptian temples being hidden and more enclosed the further one went into the site, temples of Aten were open and did not have roofs in order to allow the rays of the sun inside. No statues of Aten were allowed as they were seen as idolatry [MJF: This proscription against statues or idols was carried over into the Israelite and Jewish, faith. See more on this later]. However, these were typically replaced by functionally equivalent representations of Akhenaten and his family venerating the Aten and receiving the ankh, the breath of life, from him. Compared to periods before and after the Amarna Period, priests had less to do since offerings, such as fruits, flowers, cakes, were limited and oracles were not needed.
*The mention of Heliopolis above may be important here as it had, of course, been the main centre for the worship of the Ennead. However, I have reason to suspect that the person we have come to know as Abraham/Moses through the Bible may have been a temple priest based at Heliopolis (see more below on this) and would therefore have been directly involved with Aten worship during the Amarna Period.
In the worship of the Aten, the daily service of purification, anointment and clothing of the divine image that is traditionally found in ancient Egyptian worship was not performed. Instead, incense and food-stuff offerings such as meats, wines, and fruits were placed onto open-air altars [MJF: recalling here that Israelite priests also used incense, which can alter one’s state of consciousness, and they also made offerings of food stuffs to Yahweh – consider the shew bread for example]. A common scene in carved depictions of Akhenaten giving offering to Aten has him consecrating the sacrificed goods with a royal sceptre. Instead of barque-processions, the royal family rode in a chariot on festival days [MJF: Could this practice have carried over into later images of Apollo, the Greek sun-god, riding in a chariot perhaps?].
Aten was considered to have been everywhere and intangible as Aten was the sunlight and energy in the world. Therefore, he did not have physical representations that other traditional ancient Egyptian gods had, but instead was represented via the sun disc and reaching rays of light. The explanation as to why the Aten could not be fully represented was that the Aten was beyond creation [transcendent]. Thus. the inscriptions of scenes of gods carved in stone, which previously depicted animals and human forms instead showed the Aten as an orb above with life-giving rays stretching toward the royal figure. This power transcended human or animal form. Later, iconoclasm was enforced, and even sun disc depictions of Aten were prohibited in an edict issued by Akhenaten. In the edict, he stipulated that Aten's name was to be spelt phonetically [MJF: a practice which may again have been carried over into Judaism with the name of Yahweh being spelt phonetically as “YHWH]”.
Two temples were central to the city of Akhenaten. The larger of the two had an "open, unroofed structure covering an area of about 800 by 300 metres (2,600 ft × 1,000 ft) at the northern end of the city". Doorways had broken lintels and raised thresholds. Temples to the Aten were open-air structures with little-to-no roofing to maximize the amount of sunlight on the interior making them unique compared to other Egyptian temples of the time. Balustrades depict Akhenaten and the royal family embracing the rays of the Aten flanked stairwells, ramps, and altars. [MJF: Again, this may be reflected in the worship of the Israelites which was mainly conducted outdoors until the building of the first temples, but this point was also true of the Celts and their Druid priests, who preferred open air sacred places like groves and lakes to conduct their religious ceremonies.]
Ra-Horus, more usually referred to as Ra-Horakhty (Ra who is Horus of the two horizons), is a synthesis of two other gods, both of which are attested from very early on in ancient Egyptian religious practice. During the Amarna Period, this synthesis was seen as the invisible source of energy of the sun god, of which the visible manifestation was the Aten, the solar disk. Thus, Ra-Horus-Aten was a development of old ideas which came gradually. The real change, as some see it, was the apparent abandonment of all other gods on the state level, especially Amun-Ra, prohibition of idolatry, and the debatable introduction of quasi-monotheism by Akhenaten. The syncretism is readily apparent in the Great Hymn to the Aten in which Re-Herakhty, Shu, and Aten are merged into the creator god. Others see Akhenaten as a practitioner of an Aten monolatry*, as he did not actively deny the existence of other gods; he simply refrained from worshipping any but the Aten.
*Monolatry is the belief in the existence of many gods, but with the consistent worship of only one deity. This outlook may reflect the beliefs of many Celts who worshipped Bel, their sun god, as the supreme deity but at the same time believed in many other gods too. Some historians have argued that ancient Israel originally practiced a form of monolatry or henotheism. Old Testament scholar John Day suggests that angels in Judaism are what became of the other gods once monotheism took over Israel. The Ten Commandments have been interpreted by some as evidence that the Israelites originally practiced monolatry. Exodus 20:3 reads, "you shall have no other gods before me", and they argue that the addition of "before me" at the end of the commandment indicates not only that other gods may exist, but also that they may be respected and worshiped so long as less than Yahweh. There is evidence that the Israelites before the Babylonian captivity in the 6th century BC did not adhere to monotheism. Much of this evidence comes from the Bible itself, which records that many Israelites chose to worship foreign gods and idols rather than Yahweh. During the 8th century BC, the monotheistic worship of Yahweh in Israel was in competition with many other cults, described by the Yahwist faction collectively as Baals. The oldest books of the Hebrew Bible reflect this competition, as in the books of Hosea and Nahum, whose authors lament the "apostasy" of the people of Israel and threaten them with the wrath of God if they do not give up their polytheistic cults.
It is important to note though that Atenism did not solely attribute divinity to the Aten. Akhenaten continued the traditional imperial cult, proclaiming himself the son of Aten (MJF: recalling here that sun god Atum, the principal deity of the Ennead, was considered the Father of the Pharaohs) and encouraging the people to worship him. The people were to worship Akhenaten; only Akhenaten and the pharaoh's wife Nefertiti could worship Aten directly. The Aten cult afforded a special place to royal women, especially Nefertiti, who was linked with Akhenaten and the Aten in a divine triad. As pharaoh, Akhenaten was considered the 'high priest' or even a prophet of the Aten [MJF: which recalls the tradition that it was the pharaoh alone who channelled the gods of the Ennead and acted as their sole spokesman on Earth].
Egypt Post AkhenatenThe Aten was the disc of the sun and originally an aspect of Ra, the sun god in traditional ancient Egyptian religion. While the Aten was worshiped under the reign of Amenhotep III, it was made the sole deity to receive state and official cult worship under his successor Akhenaten, though archaeological evidence suggests the closing of the state temples of other Egyptian gods likely did not stop household worship of the traditional pantheon. Inscriptions, such as the Great Hymn to the Aten (see more on this below), found in temples and tombs during Akhenaten’s reign showcase the Aten as the creator, giver of life, and nurturing spirit of the world (N.B. a role previously allotted to the creator god Ptah).
Aten does not have a creation myth or family but is mentioned in the Egyptian Book of the Dead. The first known reference to Aten the sun-disk as a deity is in The Story of Sinuhe from the 12th Dynasty, in which the deceased king is described as rising as a god to the heavens and "uniting with the sun-disk, the divine body merging with its maker".
Aten was extensively worshipped as a solar deity during the reign of Amenhotep III where it was depicted as a falcon-headed god like Ra. While Aten was the preeminent creator deity of a pantheon of ancient Egyptian gods under Amenhotep III, it was not until his successor that Aten would be the only god acknowledged via state worship. During the reign of Amenhotep III's successor, Amenhotep IV, the Aten became the sole god of the Egyptian state religion, and Amenhotep IV changed his name to Akhenaten to reflect his close link with the supreme deity. The rays of the sun disk only holds out life to the royal family, and because of this non-royals receive life from Akhenaten and Nefertiti in exchange for loyalty to the Aten. In inscriptions, like the Hymn to the Aten and the King, the Aten is depicted as caring for the people through Akhenaten, placing the royal family as intermediaries for the worship of the Aten.
Akhenaten represented himself as the son of Aten, mirroring many of his predecessors’ claims of divine birth and their positions as the embodiment of Horus. Akhenaten positioned himself as the only intermediary who could speak to Aten, emphasizing the dominance of Aten as the pre-eminent deity. This has led to discussion of whether Atenism should be considered a monotheistic religion, and thus making it one of the first examples of monotheism.
The cult-centre of the Aten was at the capital city Akhenaten founded, Akhetaten, though other cult sites have been found in Thebes and Heliopolis*. In addition to constructing a new capital in honour of Aten, Akhenaten also oversaw the construction of some of the most massive temple complexes of ancient Egypt, including one at Karnak and one at Thebes, close to the old temple of Amun. The use of Amarna as a capital city and religious centre was relatively short lived compared to the 18th Dynasty or New Kingdom as a whole, as it was shortly abandoned after the death of Akhenaten. Inscriptions found on boundary stela accredited to Akhenaten discuss his desire to make the city a place of worship to Aten, dedicating the city to the god and emphasizing the royal residences' efforts in worship. Major principals of the Aten's cult worship were recorded via inscriptions on temples and tombs from the period. Straying significantly from the tradition of ancient Egyptian temples being hidden and more enclosed the further one went into the site, temples of Aten were open and did not have roofs in order to allow the rays of the sun inside. No statues of Aten were allowed as they were seen as idolatry [MJF: This proscription against statues or idols was carried over into the Israelite and Jewish, faith. See more on this later]. However, these were typically replaced by functionally equivalent representations of Akhenaten and his family venerating the Aten and receiving the ankh, the breath of life, from him. Compared to periods before and after the Amarna Period, priests had less to do since offerings, such as fruits, flowers, cakes, were limited and oracles were not needed.
*The mention of Heliopolis above may be important here as it had, of course, been the main centre for the worship of the Ennead. However, I have reason to suspect that the person we have come to know as Abraham/Moses through the Bible may have been a temple priest based at Heliopolis (see more below on this) and would therefore have been directly involved with Aten worship during the Amarna Period.
In the worship of the Aten, the daily service of purification, anointment and clothing of the divine image that is traditionally found in ancient Egyptian worship was not performed. Instead, incense and food-stuff offerings such as meats, wines, and fruits were placed onto open-air altars [MJF: recalling here that Israelite priests also used incense, which can alter one’s state of consciousness, and they also made offerings of food stuffs to Yahweh – consider the shew bread for example]. A common scene in carved depictions of Akhenaten giving offering to Aten has him consecrating the sacrificed goods with a royal sceptre. Instead of barque-processions, the royal family rode in a chariot on festival days [MJF: Could this practice have carried over into later images of Apollo, the Greek sun-god, riding in a chariot perhaps?].
Aten was considered to have been everywhere and intangible as Aten was the sunlight and energy in the world. Therefore, he did not have physical representations that other traditional ancient Egyptian gods had, but instead was represented via the sun disc and reaching rays of light. The explanation as to why the Aten could not be fully represented was that the Aten was beyond creation [transcendent]. Thus. the inscriptions of scenes of gods carved in stone, which previously depicted animals and human forms instead showed the Aten as an orb above with life-giving rays stretching toward the royal figure. This power transcended human or animal form. Later, iconoclasm was enforced, and even sun disc depictions of Aten were prohibited in an edict issued by Akhenaten. In the edict, he stipulated that Aten's name was to be spelt phonetically [MJF: a practice which may again have been carried over into Judaism with the name of Yahweh being spelt phonetically as “YHWH]”.
Two temples were central to the city of Akhenaten. The larger of the two had an "open, unroofed structure covering an area of about 800 by 300 metres (2,600 ft × 1,000 ft) at the northern end of the city". Doorways had broken lintels and raised thresholds. Temples to the Aten were open-air structures with little-to-no roofing to maximize the amount of sunlight on the interior making them unique compared to other Egyptian temples of the time. Balustrades depict Akhenaten and the royal family embracing the rays of the Aten flanked stairwells, ramps, and altars. [MJF: Again, this may be reflected in the worship of the Israelites which was mainly conducted outdoors until the building of the first temples, but this point was also true of the Celts and their Druid priests, who preferred open air sacred places like groves and lakes to conduct their religious ceremonies.]
Ra-Horus, more usually referred to as Ra-Horakhty (Ra who is Horus of the two horizons), is a synthesis of two other gods, both of which are attested from very early on in ancient Egyptian religious practice. During the Amarna Period, this synthesis was seen as the invisible source of energy of the sun god, of which the visible manifestation was the Aten, the solar disk. Thus, Ra-Horus-Aten was a development of old ideas which came gradually. The real change, as some see it, was the apparent abandonment of all other gods on the state level, especially Amun-Ra, prohibition of idolatry, and the debatable introduction of quasi-monotheism by Akhenaten. The syncretism is readily apparent in the Great Hymn to the Aten in which Re-Herakhty, Shu, and Aten are merged into the creator god. Others see Akhenaten as a practitioner of an Aten monolatry*, as he did not actively deny the existence of other gods; he simply refrained from worshipping any but the Aten.
*Monolatry is the belief in the existence of many gods, but with the consistent worship of only one deity. This outlook may reflect the beliefs of many Celts who worshipped Bel, their sun god, as the supreme deity but at the same time believed in many other gods too. Some historians have argued that ancient Israel originally practiced a form of monolatry or henotheism. Old Testament scholar John Day suggests that angels in Judaism are what became of the other gods once monotheism took over Israel. The Ten Commandments have been interpreted by some as evidence that the Israelites originally practiced monolatry. Exodus 20:3 reads, "you shall have no other gods before me", and they argue that the addition of "before me" at the end of the commandment indicates not only that other gods may exist, but also that they may be respected and worshiped so long as less than Yahweh. There is evidence that the Israelites before the Babylonian captivity in the 6th century BC did not adhere to monotheism. Much of this evidence comes from the Bible itself, which records that many Israelites chose to worship foreign gods and idols rather than Yahweh. During the 8th century BC, the monotheistic worship of Yahweh in Israel was in competition with many other cults, described by the Yahwist faction collectively as Baals. The oldest books of the Hebrew Bible reflect this competition, as in the books of Hosea and Nahum, whose authors lament the "apostasy" of the people of Israel and threaten them with the wrath of God if they do not give up their polytheistic cults.
It is important to note though that Atenism did not solely attribute divinity to the Aten. Akhenaten continued the traditional imperial cult, proclaiming himself the son of Aten (MJF: recalling here that sun god Atum, the principal deity of the Ennead, was considered the Father of the Pharaohs) and encouraging the people to worship him. The people were to worship Akhenaten; only Akhenaten and the pharaoh's wife Nefertiti could worship Aten directly. The Aten cult afforded a special place to royal women, especially Nefertiti, who was linked with Akhenaten and the Aten in a divine triad. As pharaoh, Akhenaten was considered the 'high priest' or even a prophet of the Aten [MJF: which recalls the tradition that it was the pharaoh alone who channelled the gods of the Ennead and acted as their sole spokesman on Earth].
After the death of Akhenaten, his young son Tutankhamun reinstated the cult of Amun and the ban on the state worship of non-Atenism deities was lifted in favour of a return to the traditional ancient Egyptian pantheon. The point of this transition can be seen in the name-change of Tutankhaten into Tutankhamun indicating the loss of favour in the worship of the Aten. While there was no purge of the cult after Akhenaten's death, the Aten persisted in Egypt for another ten years or so until it seemed to fade away. When Tutankhamun came to power, his religious reign was one of tolerance, with the major difference being that the Aten was no longer the only god worshiped within official, state capacity. Tutankhamun made efforts to rebuild the state temples that were destroyed during Akhenaten's reign and reinstate the traditional pantheon of gods. This seemed to be a move based publicly on the doctrine that Egypt's woes stemmed directly from it ignoring the gods, and in turn the gods' abandoned Egypt.
And let us recall that the C’s confirmed that Akhenaten’s reign coincided with the eruption of Thera, as the result of a close encounter with the planet Venus or a large comet, and the resulting plagues and pestilence this brought in its wake. Indeed, it would seem Akhenaten, as Pharoah and therefore spokesman for the gods, had to shoulder the blame for Egypt’s woes and this would lead to him being deliberately drowned in the Nile:
And let us recall that the C’s confirmed that Akhenaten’s reign coincided with the eruption of Thera, as the result of a close encounter with the planet Venus or a large comet, and the resulting plagues and pestilence this brought in its wake. Indeed, it would seem Akhenaten, as Pharoah and therefore spokesman for the gods, had to shoulder the blame for Egypt’s woes and this would lead to him being deliberately drowned in the Nile:
Session 20 August 2001:
Q: Was the explosion of Thera the cataclysmic story later added to the Exodus?
A: Yes.
Q: Did the Mediterranean Sea part?
A: No.
Q: Did this happen at the same time as when Abraham was fleeing from Akhenaten, hauling off his wife Nefertiti/Sarah?
A: Yes.
Q: What happened to Akhenaten?
A: Drowned in the Nile.
Session 23 August 2001:
Q: If Akhenaten pursued Abraham and Sarah at the time of the eruption of Thera, did it happen that the waters of the Nile withdrew and then slammed back and hit him?
A: In part.
Q: So the disruption upset the Nile. It made it turbulent, or overflow, or dangerous in some sense?
A: Yes. Q: (L) Now, I have a little problem with my writing. First of all, did the eruption of Thera occur in 1627 BC or thereabouts?
A: Close.
Q: (L) What stimulated the eruption of Thera?
A: Venus.
{Here I think that "Venus" is a code for the giant comet described by Victor Clube}
Q: (L) Well, about 40 years after that there was the comet cluster, in 1588 BC, correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, it seems that Nefertiti disappeared from history in the 12th year of the reign of Akhenaten. He then died in the 17th year of his reign. If Nefertiti was Sarah, where was she during this five year period, if Akhenaten died going after her when Abraham/Moses carried her off?
A: Locked up.
Q: (L) So, Nefertiti is Sarah and Abraham came and rescued her somehow, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And that happened at the time of the passage of the comet cluster, between 1627 BC and 1588 BC - dramatic events which is what enabled that particular drama to take place...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So Abraham retrieved Sarah and Akhenaten went after them and drowned in the river or something?
A: Close.
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: (L) You mentioned before that Helen/Nefertiti/Sarah was locked up by Akhenaten. Why, specifically, was she locked up?
A: He became unable to function and the action was taken by others. [MJF: Smenkhkare and Kiya perhaps?]
Q: (L) Did Akhenaten go mad as I have surmised?
A: Pretty much.
Q: (L) Did he fall in the Nile and get eaten by a crocodile as the story about one pharaoh suggests?
A: No Crocodile.
Q: So, he just fell in and drowned?
A: More like he was "helped."
Q: (L) Sounds to me like this poor guy was just a patsy all around.
A: Yup.
Q: The story about the plague that is told in Manetho, was this a plague as in leprosy, a disease, or something else?
A: It was multiple elements including leprosy.
Q: (L) What were these different elements?
A: Consider the writings about cometary showers.
I know that Laura has written extensively on the C’s last point on cometary showers, so I have no wish to go over old ground here. However, is there any contemporary proof of the Biblical account of the plagues of Egypt having occurred at the time of Akhenaten’s reign? Well, yes there is.
Continued in Part 2
Continued in Part 2
Abraham, Moses, Akhenaten, Meritaten and the Cassiopaeans Part 2
The Ipuwer Papyrus
Quoting below from the article by Marina Sohma: Does the Ipuwer Papyrus Provide Evidence for the Events of the Exodus?
See: Does the Ipuwer Papyrus Provide Evidence for the Events of the Exodus? | Ancient Origins (ancient-origins.net)
“It must have explained the circumstances under which the chief personage named, one ‘Ipw’ or ‘Opw-wr’, came forward to hold a long and impassioned harangue in the presence of the king and his people. These speeches, in the opinion of Dr. Lange, are prophetic in character; an era of disasters is predicted for Egypt, and is even now, as one passage declares, at hand; and it is the king himself who is responsible for the calamities the bitterness of which he is soon to taste in full measure.[…] I conclusion, it is suggested that the book may have had an historical background, and that the writer had possibly in his mind some such political situation as that of the troublous times which preceded the rise of the twelfth dynasty”.
However, the scholars they rely on here are taking the Biblical narrative of a mass exodus of Israelites (who, as Hittites, would have been viewed as Asiatics or Amu by the native Egyptians) literally rather than the relatively small group of just 600 plus people who went into exile with Abraham/Moses, as confirmed by the C’s:
Q: (L) So, from 1627 BC to 1588 BC - that's 39 years - almost exactly 40 years of "wandering in the desert," so to say. So, they must have escaped when Thera blew and forty years later, the comets came. What was Abraham and his crew doing during that time?
A: Bedouins.
Q: (L) How many were in this tribe?
A: 623.
Q: (L) So it wasn't multiple thousands of people as the Bible would have us believe. Okay, is Abraham the same individual as is presented as his son, Isaac?
A: No.
The Exodus Enigma
A: "Celtic," what does it mean?
Q: (L) Well, the word "kilt" comes from "Celtic," but no one seems to know where they originated... they just sort of appeared on the landscape, so to speak.
A: Exactly!
Q: One of the questions we would like to clear up is the issue of the Holy Grail and the Ark. Is the Ark of the Covenant - the ark thing given to the early pre-Mosaic Jews that you have described previously - the same as the Holy Grail?
A: No.
Q: (L) So there are two completely different technologies?
A: If you wish to term it such.
Q: (Galahad) Thanks guys! That's real clear!
A: This is an issue that will clarify itself soon enough.
Q: (L) Is my idea correct that we can identify the presence of these more-or-less technologies by the architecture or art or megalithic structures of the different groups on the planet?
A: To some extent, yes. But do not let that be the only clue. You might consider "lifestyle" as well as the presence and uses of metals; particularly gold vs. iron. [MJF: Gold was used a lot in Ancient Egypt for ornamentation, although it was mined outside of Egypt mainly in Nubia, whereas iron ore was mined and refined in Hittite Anatolia and used for the Hittite’s powerful war chariots and weapons.]
Q: (Galahad) Well, we got that part right. (L) Once before we discussed Nefertiti and Sarah being one and the same person. We have now been discussing the idea, based on some significant clues in ancient documents, that this individual was also Helen of Troy. Is this, in fact, a useful idea to follow? Is it a correct assessment of the clues?
A: Indeed!
Q: (L) That would mean that, according to the story, that Paris/Alexander would be the same individual as Abraham and that Herodotus' story of Paris and Helen sojourning in Egypt was true?
A: Yes.
*Stephanus of Byzantium was a 6th century AD Byzantine grammarian and the author of an important geographical dictionary entitled Ethnica (Ἐθνικά), only meagre fragments of which survive, although an epitome, i.e., a summary or miniature form of it, is extant. Nearly every article in the epitome contains a reference to some ancient writer, as an authority for the name of the place.
Q: What was the connection between the Hyperboreans, including the Celts of Britain, I believe, and the people of Delos?
A: Northern peoples were responsible for civilising the Meditteranean/Adriatic peoples with the encoded secrets contained within their superior extra-terrestrially based genetic arrangement. Practice of which you speak was multi-trans-generational habit.
Q: (L) Where do the Celts come from?
A: Same. Ferocious people. Came from fifth planet.
*Indeed, the oldest name for England would seem to be Albion. The names for Scotland in the Celtic languages were also related to Albion: Alba in Scottish Gaelic, Alba in Irish, and Alban in Welsh, Cornish, and Breton. Could Albion have been Trojan Britain’s original name perhaps?
“It seemed to him the goddess stood before him and spoke these words to him: ‘Brutus, beyond the setting of the sun, past the realms of Gaul, there lies an island in the sea, once occupied by giants. Now it is empty and ready for your folk. Down the years this will prove an abode suited to you and your people; and to your descendants it will be a second Troy. A race of kings will be born there from your stock and round the circle of the whole earth will be subject to them’.”
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: (L) Previously we were told that Helen was a genetically tweaked Hittite. Were her parents anybody who would be familiar to us outside of mythology?
A: No.
Q: (L) So her parentage was strictly mythical. Was she a member of any esteemed family or royal family along that line as has been claimed?
A: Here also you will make a discovery.
Graham Phillip’s View of the Exodus
Phillips dealt with the issue of when the Exodus took place in two of his books, the first being Act of God and the second being The Templars and the Ark of the Covenant. I have, of course, commented from both these books in previous articles. Unlike Ian Wilson, Phillips places the Thera eruption and the ensuing biblical plagues of Egypt in the last year of the reign of Pharoah Amenhotep III’s reign. He was Akhenaten’s father and Akhenaten may well have reigned alongside him by that stage, as this was the established practice when a pharaoh was old and clearly coming towards the end of his reign. Phillips made this deduction when he compared the events described in the Biblical story of the Exodus to the events that occurred after the volcanic eruptions at Krakatau and Mount Saint Helens.
In the Bible, when Pharaoh refused Moses’s demands to let the enslaved Israelites have their freedom, God (Yaheweh) is said to have punished Egypt by a series of what the Bible calls plagues. These were: darkness over the land, the Nile turning to blood, fiery hailstorms, cattle deaths, a plague of boils, and infestations of frogs, lice, flies and locusts. Although these plagues sound the stuff of myth and legend, Phillips’ research showed that these events could certainly have been the result of a natural catastrophe such as a gigantic volcanic eruption. As noted above, first came darkness over the land. Fast forward to the 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens where the sun was obscured for hours even five hundred miles from the volcano. With the even larger eruption of Krakatau near Sumatra in 1883, the skies were darkened to a much greater distance being dark as night for days on end almost a thousand miles away. One should note that the eruption of Thera was exponentially much greater than Krakatau and made Mount Saint Helens look like a firecracker by comparison*. In the Bible narrative, it speaks of three days of thick darkness over all the land of Egypt (MJF: which makes me think of the prophesied three days of darkness Laura once alluded to in the transcripts).
*Krakatau exploded with a force 20 times that of Mount Saint Helens. Where the Mount Saint Helens’ eruption produced a cloud of ash some five miles high, the volcanic cloud that ensued from Krakatau’s eruption rose fifty miles into the air. However, it has been estimated by comparing the size of the resultant craters that Thera’s explosion was almost six times greater than that of Krakatau and the volcanic debris would therefore have been hurled over a hundred miles high, with the ash fallout covering well over a million square miles. To put things in perspective, it would take today 6,000 of the most destructive modern nuclear warheads to equal the explosive magnitude of Thera.
Next Phillips showed how the Biblical thunder, hail and fire that rained upon the land of Egypt, killing all the cattle in the open fields, and breaking every tree was replicated in Krakatau when pellet-sized volcanic debris fell like hail, the fiery pumice setting fires alight on the ground and destroying trees and houses, with lightning flashing around, generated by the tremendous turbulence inside the volcanic cloud. Even after the lesser eruption of Mount Saint Helens, volcanic debris fell like hailstones flattening crops hundred of miles away. This resulted in millions of dollars’ worth of crops being destroyed.
As to the Biblical plague of boils caused by the fine dust blown over all the land of Egypt, the eruption of Mount Saint Helens saw hundreds of people being taken to hospital with skin sores and rashes due to exposure to the acidic fallout and a great deal of livestock perished or had to be destroyed due to prolonged inhalation of the volcanic dust. The ash and dust, which fell like rain, clogged motor vehicle engines, halted trains and aircraft, and blocked roads.
After the Mount Saint Helens’ eruption, fish also died and were found floating on the surface of hundreds of miles of waterways. The pungent odour of pumice permeated everything, and water supplies had to be cut off until the impurities could be filtered from reservoirs. These observed occurrences reflect very closely what was said in Exodus 7:21:
“And the fish that was in the river died: and the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink of the river, and there was blood throughout all the land of Egypt.”
The Ipuwer Papyrus
Quoting below from the article by Marina Sohma: Does the Ipuwer Papyrus Provide Evidence for the Events of the Exodus?
See: Does the Ipuwer Papyrus Provide Evidence for the Events of the Exodus? | Ancient Origins (ancient-origins.net)
The Ipuwer papyrus, also known as the ‘Admonitions of Ipuwer’, is a controversial text that describes starvation, drought, death, and violent upheavals in ancient Egypt, with some maintaining that it is an eyewitness account of the Exodus plagues. Neither the beginning nor end of this work was preserved, leaving historians with difficulty in interpreting the material and reaching a final conclusion about the events it describes.
Written in a single papyrus, the Admonitions of Ipuwer, (catalogue name Papyrus Leiden 344) is a poetic composition believed to have been written during the Egyptian Middle Kingdom era, a period corresponding to 2050 BC - 1652 BC. The origin of acquisition regarding this document is obscure. It was in possession of the Greek diplomat and merchant Yianni Anastasiou who claimed that the papyrus was discovered at Memphis, in the Saqqara region. It is currently housed at the National Archaeological Museum in Leiden, Netherlands.
The nature of the message in the Ipuwer papyrus depicts violence and chaos in Egypt. According to Dr. Lange, evidence does validate the idea that the Ipuwer papyrus was written during the Middle Kingdom, as the language style and vocabulary corresponds to those used during that era. Dr. Lange says that there are indications that the manuscript was copied from an older version, perhaps dating from the beginning of the 18th Dynasty (circa 1550 BC to 1292 BC). There are unfilled spaces which probably illustrates that it was missing or illegible in the original copied document.
Many scholars support the theory proposed by Dr. Lange, who believes the Ipuwer papyrus contains prophetic utterances of an Egyptian seer, as Alan Gardiner relates:
Written in a single papyrus, the Admonitions of Ipuwer, (catalogue name Papyrus Leiden 344) is a poetic composition believed to have been written during the Egyptian Middle Kingdom era, a period corresponding to 2050 BC - 1652 BC. The origin of acquisition regarding this document is obscure. It was in possession of the Greek diplomat and merchant Yianni Anastasiou who claimed that the papyrus was discovered at Memphis, in the Saqqara region. It is currently housed at the National Archaeological Museum in Leiden, Netherlands.
The nature of the message in the Ipuwer papyrus depicts violence and chaos in Egypt. According to Dr. Lange, evidence does validate the idea that the Ipuwer papyrus was written during the Middle Kingdom, as the language style and vocabulary corresponds to those used during that era. Dr. Lange says that there are indications that the manuscript was copied from an older version, perhaps dating from the beginning of the 18th Dynasty (circa 1550 BC to 1292 BC). There are unfilled spaces which probably illustrates that it was missing or illegible in the original copied document.
Many scholars support the theory proposed by Dr. Lange, who believes the Ipuwer papyrus contains prophetic utterances of an Egyptian seer, as Alan Gardiner relates:
“It must have explained the circumstances under which the chief personage named, one ‘Ipw’ or ‘Opw-wr’, came forward to hold a long and impassioned harangue in the presence of the king and his people. These speeches, in the opinion of Dr. Lange, are prophetic in character; an era of disasters is predicted for Egypt, and is even now, as one passage declares, at hand; and it is the king himself who is responsible for the calamities the bitterness of which he is soon to taste in full measure.[…] I conclusion, it is suggested that the book may have had an historical background, and that the writer had possibly in his mind some such political situation as that of the troublous times which preceded the rise of the twelfth dynasty”.
On the other hand, a controversial, yet intriguing, interpretation of this text was proposed by Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky who brought up a theory that the Ipuwer papyrus is a source of evidence for the events of the Exodus, from the Old Testament. The contents of this papyrus have an oddly familiar ring to those who know their Old Testament. ‘Plague is throughout the land. Blood is everywhere…The river is blood…Gates, columns and walls are consumed by fire…. Cattle moan…The land is not light’”. Literary analyses would put the original, of which the Leiden papyrus is a copy, at some time during the Egyptian Middle Kingdom and the very beginning of the turbulent Hyksos period. This would certainly coincide, therefore, with the reigns of Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaten.
Gardiner agrees with Velikovsky’s chronology in the sense that the Ipuwer papyrus text tells us about both a civil war and of an Asiatic occupation of the Delta. The two periods in which this might be possible are the dark age that separated the sixth from the eleventh dynasty, and the other is the Hyksos period. Gardiner inclines towards the theory of the invasion of Hyksos to explain the events in which this papyrus alludes.
Gardiner has no doubt that Ipuwer’s pessimism was intended to be understood as the response to a real national calamity and the references to Asiatic aggression on the Delta and devastation of the land through civil war leaves no room for questions on this point. However, this doesn’t stop Wikipedia from trying to rebut the Exodus connection:
“Ipuwer has often been put forward in popular literature as confirmation of the biblical account of the Exodus, most notably because of its statement that "the river is blood" and its frequent references to servants running away. This assertion has not gained acceptance among scholars. There are disparities between Ipuwer and the narrative in the Book of Exodus, such as that the papyrus describes the Asiatics as arriving in Egypt rather than leaving. The papyrus' statement that the "river is blood" phrase may refer to the red sediment colouring the Nile during disastrous floods, or simply be a poetic image of turmoil.”
Gardiner agrees with Velikovsky’s chronology in the sense that the Ipuwer papyrus text tells us about both a civil war and of an Asiatic occupation of the Delta. The two periods in which this might be possible are the dark age that separated the sixth from the eleventh dynasty, and the other is the Hyksos period. Gardiner inclines towards the theory of the invasion of Hyksos to explain the events in which this papyrus alludes.
Gardiner has no doubt that Ipuwer’s pessimism was intended to be understood as the response to a real national calamity and the references to Asiatic aggression on the Delta and devastation of the land through civil war leaves no room for questions on this point. However, this doesn’t stop Wikipedia from trying to rebut the Exodus connection:
“Ipuwer has often been put forward in popular literature as confirmation of the biblical account of the Exodus, most notably because of its statement that "the river is blood" and its frequent references to servants running away. This assertion has not gained acceptance among scholars. There are disparities between Ipuwer and the narrative in the Book of Exodus, such as that the papyrus describes the Asiatics as arriving in Egypt rather than leaving. The papyrus' statement that the "river is blood" phrase may refer to the red sediment colouring the Nile during disastrous floods, or simply be a poetic image of turmoil.”
However, the scholars they rely on here are taking the Biblical narrative of a mass exodus of Israelites (who, as Hittites, would have been viewed as Asiatics or Amu by the native Egyptians) literally rather than the relatively small group of just 600 plus people who went into exile with Abraham/Moses, as confirmed by the C’s:
Q: (L) So, from 1627 BC to 1588 BC - that's 39 years - almost exactly 40 years of "wandering in the desert," so to say. So, they must have escaped when Thera blew and forty years later, the comets came. What was Abraham and his crew doing during that time?
A: Bedouins.
Q: (L) How many were in this tribe?
A: 623.
Q: (L) So it wasn't multiple thousands of people as the Bible would have us believe. Okay, is Abraham the same individual as is presented as his son, Isaac?
A: No.
But Gardiner and Velikovsky are not the only persons to date the Biblical plagues and the Exodus to the 18th Dynasty for, as I have pointed out in previous posts, so do the British writers and researchers Ian Wilson and Graham Phillips.
The Exodus Enigma
In his book The Exodus Enigma, Ian Wilson makes the point that according to Egyptian sources, the Asiatics who poured into the Nile Delta spoke the same West Semitic language as that of the Biblical Israelites. Wilson quotes Genesis 12:10 “There was a famine in the land, so severe that Abram went down to Egypt to live there for a while.” However, Wilson does not, of course, view Abraham and Moses as one and the same person the way we do.
In the tomb of the 19th century BC nobleman Khnumhotep found at Ben-Hassan, 200 miles from Cairo, there is a well-known painting of a group of Asiatics making an approach to the Egyptian border.
According to the hieroglyphic inscription there were 37 people in this particular party who were the ‘Amu from Shotu’, thought to have been modern Transjordania. You may note the two sets of bellows on top of the baggage carried by the donkeys, which suggests this group were able to turn their hand to metalwork, a skill which the Egyptians in general were never particularly adept. However, we know that the Celts were from antiquity renowned as metalworkers.
Note also the multicoloured clothing that is evocative of the patriarch Joseph’s coat of many colours, which may establish a strong link to the Scythians and their later Scoti or Scottish descendants who are famous for their multicoloured, plaid or tartan kilts. This reference reminds me of what the C’s once said about the Celts:
Q: (L) I am curious about what I call the "Scottish Question." Why is it that every time I start a paper trail on any issue of conspiracy, there always seems to be a link to Scotland and Scots? In the tomb of the 19th century BC nobleman Khnumhotep found at Ben-Hassan, 200 miles from Cairo, there is a well-known painting of a group of Asiatics making an approach to the Egyptian border.
According to the hieroglyphic inscription there were 37 people in this particular party who were the ‘Amu from Shotu’, thought to have been modern Transjordania. You may note the two sets of bellows on top of the baggage carried by the donkeys, which suggests this group were able to turn their hand to metalwork, a skill which the Egyptians in general were never particularly adept. However, we know that the Celts were from antiquity renowned as metalworkers.
Note also the multicoloured clothing that is evocative of the patriarch Joseph’s coat of many colours, which may establish a strong link to the Scythians and their later Scoti or Scottish descendants who are famous for their multicoloured, plaid or tartan kilts. This reference reminds me of what the C’s once said about the Celts:
A: "Celtic," what does it mean?
Q: (L) Well, the word "kilt" comes from "Celtic," but no one seems to know where they originated... they just sort of appeared on the landscape, so to speak.
A: Exactly!
I have in previous posts mentioned the possibility that the Hebrews of the Bible may be equated with a group known to the Egyptians as the ‘Habiru’. Ian Wilson is also alive to this possibility but wisely urges caution. However, he does point out that earlier references to the Habiru do locate them in the northern reaches of the river Euphrates, which is in accordance with the patriarch Abraham’s origins as described in Joshua 24:2: “Long ago your forefathers, Terah and his sons Abraham and Nahor, lived beside the Euphrates, and they worshipped other gods.”
Recalling the bloodline covenant Moses made with the Israelites, as referred to above, Wilson noted that there were a variety of strange practices uniquely referred to in association with the patriarchs of the book of Genesis, which can be traced to social customs peculiar to the Mesopotamian city states of Mari and Nuzi. As a mark of his covenant with God, in Genesis 15 Abraham is described as having halved some animals down the middle, then ‘placed each piece opposite its corresponding piece’, a ritual act seemingly intended to invoke the fate of the animals upon anyone breaking the covenant. Wilson then adds that a nearly identical practice, the killing of an ass to bind treaties, is referred to in the tablets from Mari.
Furthermore, Wilson notes that three times in the Book of Genesis (chapters 12, 20 and 26) Abraham and his son Isaac are represented introducing their wives as their sisters to friendly monarchs – an apparently motiveless piece of deception leading to inevitable embarrassment once they were found out. For Wilson this confusion is explained by the Nuzi tablets. At Nuzi a man could impart particular sanctity to his marriage if, on marrying, he adopted bis wife as his sister. Does this mean that Abraham may have been married to Sarah/Nefertiti (both being Hittites and Levites) before they arrived in Egypt? Although one cannot rule this possibility out, I think it unlikely (unless they were betrothed at a very young age as has been the custom with royalty from time immemorial in order to cement dynastic ties) since my understanding is that Nefertiti was supposed to have grown up at the court of Pharaoh (as did Moses for that matter) as part of his extended household.
But Wilson also mentions a third example which concerns the practice of surrogacy. In Genesis, the marriages of both Abraham and Jacob (who the C’s confirmed was yet another persona of Abraham/Moses) reached a stage of near despair from them being childless. In both cases their wives, suspecting it is they who are infertile and suggested that a servant girl should act as a surrogate mother. In Genesis 16:12 Abraham is told by his wife Sarah or Sarai: “Take my slave girl [Hagar]; perhaps I shall find a family through her.” In Genesis 30:3 Jacob is similarly told by his wife Rachel: “Here is my slave girl Bilhah. Lie with her, so that she may bear sons to be laid upon my knees, and through her I too may build a family.” Wilson notes that such a concept is totally absent from the later scriptures, but this practice had official blessing at the city of Nuzi. There, if a man’s wife was barren, it was her duty to find another woman to bear her husband’s children, those children becoming hers as if she had borne them herself – reflecting Sarah’s words – “perhaps I shall find a family through her”. For Wilson, these practices strongly suggest that the ancestors of the Biblical Hebrews spent some time in their wanderings on the fringes of Mari and Nuzi at a date which may be roughly assigned to the first half of the second millennium BC.
I would point out that even of this link is true, it may not explain the peculiar circumstances in which Abraham/Moses/Jacob had a child, Ishmael. with his wife’s (Nefertiti/Sarah/Rachel) daughter Meritaten - otherwise known in the Bible as Hagar the Egyptian. Even if Abraham/Moses and Sarah/Nefertiti had roots which lay with the people who were the Biblical Hebrews, who were possibly the Habiru, they would seem to have been Hittites according to the C’s, who at that time occupied Anatolia (modern day Turkey) and not the Fertile Crescent (Mesopotomia) where the cities of Mari and Nuzi were situated. Moreover, it is more likely that as two persons who had spent many, if not most, of their formative years in Egypt at the Pharaoh’s court, they would have naturally adopted Egyptian customs and practices. We know that the pharaohs of the 18th dynasty practiced incest with female close family members, so although it may seem shocking to our sensibilities today, the act of Abraham/Moses having a child with his stepdaughter would not have been viewed as something out of the ordinary in the Egyptian culture of that period.
Who was Moses?Recalling the bloodline covenant Moses made with the Israelites, as referred to above, Wilson noted that there were a variety of strange practices uniquely referred to in association with the patriarchs of the book of Genesis, which can be traced to social customs peculiar to the Mesopotamian city states of Mari and Nuzi. As a mark of his covenant with God, in Genesis 15 Abraham is described as having halved some animals down the middle, then ‘placed each piece opposite its corresponding piece’, a ritual act seemingly intended to invoke the fate of the animals upon anyone breaking the covenant. Wilson then adds that a nearly identical practice, the killing of an ass to bind treaties, is referred to in the tablets from Mari.
Furthermore, Wilson notes that three times in the Book of Genesis (chapters 12, 20 and 26) Abraham and his son Isaac are represented introducing their wives as their sisters to friendly monarchs – an apparently motiveless piece of deception leading to inevitable embarrassment once they were found out. For Wilson this confusion is explained by the Nuzi tablets. At Nuzi a man could impart particular sanctity to his marriage if, on marrying, he adopted bis wife as his sister. Does this mean that Abraham may have been married to Sarah/Nefertiti (both being Hittites and Levites) before they arrived in Egypt? Although one cannot rule this possibility out, I think it unlikely (unless they were betrothed at a very young age as has been the custom with royalty from time immemorial in order to cement dynastic ties) since my understanding is that Nefertiti was supposed to have grown up at the court of Pharaoh (as did Moses for that matter) as part of his extended household.
But Wilson also mentions a third example which concerns the practice of surrogacy. In Genesis, the marriages of both Abraham and Jacob (who the C’s confirmed was yet another persona of Abraham/Moses) reached a stage of near despair from them being childless. In both cases their wives, suspecting it is they who are infertile and suggested that a servant girl should act as a surrogate mother. In Genesis 16:12 Abraham is told by his wife Sarah or Sarai: “Take my slave girl [Hagar]; perhaps I shall find a family through her.” In Genesis 30:3 Jacob is similarly told by his wife Rachel: “Here is my slave girl Bilhah. Lie with her, so that she may bear sons to be laid upon my knees, and through her I too may build a family.” Wilson notes that such a concept is totally absent from the later scriptures, but this practice had official blessing at the city of Nuzi. There, if a man’s wife was barren, it was her duty to find another woman to bear her husband’s children, those children becoming hers as if she had borne them herself – reflecting Sarah’s words – “perhaps I shall find a family through her”. For Wilson, these practices strongly suggest that the ancestors of the Biblical Hebrews spent some time in their wanderings on the fringes of Mari and Nuzi at a date which may be roughly assigned to the first half of the second millennium BC.
I would point out that even of this link is true, it may not explain the peculiar circumstances in which Abraham/Moses/Jacob had a child, Ishmael. with his wife’s (Nefertiti/Sarah/Rachel) daughter Meritaten - otherwise known in the Bible as Hagar the Egyptian. Even if Abraham/Moses and Sarah/Nefertiti had roots which lay with the people who were the Biblical Hebrews, who were possibly the Habiru, they would seem to have been Hittites according to the C’s, who at that time occupied Anatolia (modern day Turkey) and not the Fertile Crescent (Mesopotomia) where the cities of Mari and Nuzi were situated. Moreover, it is more likely that as two persons who had spent many, if not most, of their formative years in Egypt at the Pharaoh’s court, they would have naturally adopted Egyptian customs and practices. We know that the pharaohs of the 18th dynasty practiced incest with female close family members, so although it may seem shocking to our sensibilities today, the act of Abraham/Moses having a child with his stepdaughter would not have been viewed as something out of the ordinary in the Egyptian culture of that period.
This issue of Abraham/Moses and Nefertiti/Sarah living at Pharoah’s court leads to the question of who really was Moses? Wilson points out that the name “Moses” is an Egyptian one meaning “is born”, the same as “mosis” in the name Tuthmosis or Tuthmose, an Egyptian prince and elder brother of Akhenaten, who some think people could have been the real Moses, who mysteriously disappeared from the record prior to Akhenaten’s ascent of the throne (see more below on this). Wilson also points out that several of the Levites (recalling here that the C’s have told us they were Hittites) described in the Bible as having been involved in the Exodus, including Phinehas, Merari and Hophni, had, like Moses, Egyptian names. For Wilson, this does not mean that these people were necessarily Egyptian, but they had been so long Egyptianized that they had no Semitic names to fall back on.
Like Laura, Wilson entertained serious doubts about the truth of certain aspects of the Biblical story of Moses’s birth, but he noted that there were clues in the account which suggests he had a relatively well-to-do Egyptian upbringing. Wilson noted that during the 18th Dynasty, it was not uncommon for the children of subject foreign princes to be brought up in the Egyptian court – the apparent reason being to gain their loyalty in adult life. Wilson wonders whether Moses was one of these children, noting that if this was the case, then the practice of Egyptian inculturation had clearly failed where he was concerned.
To support this hypothesis further, Wilson cites the Biblical scholar George Mendenhall who argued that the possibility Moses spent some time at a royal court is indicated by the similarity between the covenant which he is described as having set up between God and the Israelite people (see above) and the type of covenant between lord and vassal that was common around the middle of the second millennium BC among such people as the Hittites. This argument is even more persuasive once you take into account the C’s confirmation that Abraham/Moses was in fact a Hittite. Mendenhall points out that the form of covenant is in each case almost identical: the lord’s identification of himself and his titles, “I am the Lord your God”; a statement of his past munificence, “Who brought you out of Egypt”; a requirement of loyalty and obedience, “You shall have no other gods to set against Me; you shall not make a carved image …” and so on.
But for Wilson, the links with Egypt go further than just the adoption of Egyptian names. Intriguingly, Wilson notes that the idea of an ‘ark’ as a portable god-house was typically Egyptian. He points out that on his military campaigns Tuthmosis III would travel with a portable shrine, which was the cabin of a ceremonial boat housing an image of the god Amon - ‘he who is hidden’ - and Egyptian armies paraded before it, regarding it as their divine protection, in a manner reminiscent of the Israelites subsequent use of the Ark of the Covenant. Like the Israelite Ark, the Egyptian one could be opened only by specially privileged persons, in this case the pharaoh and his most senior priests. Let us also recall that an ark like contraption, which may have been a similar portable shrine, was found by Howard Carter in the tomb of Tutankhamun.
However, if the Hittite Abraham/Moses had been brought up in the Egyptian court then the same could be equally true of the Hittite Nefertiti, whose Egyptian name meant ‘the beautiful one is come’. She may have been quite young when she originally came to the Egyptian court, whether voluntarily or otherwise. Alternatively, she may have already been mature at that time and may have known or had a relationship with Abraham/Moses before arriving at Pharaoh’s court, which the Biblical story of Abraham passing her off as his sister to Pharaoh may allude to.
This last point may link up with Laura and the Chateau crew’s observation, which the C’s confirmed was true, that Abraham/Moses was also Paris in Homer’s account of the Trojan War as set out in the Iliad and the Odyssey, and Nefertiti/Sarah was Helen of Troy:
Session 2 February 2003:
Like Laura, Wilson entertained serious doubts about the truth of certain aspects of the Biblical story of Moses’s birth, but he noted that there were clues in the account which suggests he had a relatively well-to-do Egyptian upbringing. Wilson noted that during the 18th Dynasty, it was not uncommon for the children of subject foreign princes to be brought up in the Egyptian court – the apparent reason being to gain their loyalty in adult life. Wilson wonders whether Moses was one of these children, noting that if this was the case, then the practice of Egyptian inculturation had clearly failed where he was concerned.
To support this hypothesis further, Wilson cites the Biblical scholar George Mendenhall who argued that the possibility Moses spent some time at a royal court is indicated by the similarity between the covenant which he is described as having set up between God and the Israelite people (see above) and the type of covenant between lord and vassal that was common around the middle of the second millennium BC among such people as the Hittites. This argument is even more persuasive once you take into account the C’s confirmation that Abraham/Moses was in fact a Hittite. Mendenhall points out that the form of covenant is in each case almost identical: the lord’s identification of himself and his titles, “I am the Lord your God”; a statement of his past munificence, “Who brought you out of Egypt”; a requirement of loyalty and obedience, “You shall have no other gods to set against Me; you shall not make a carved image …” and so on.
But for Wilson, the links with Egypt go further than just the adoption of Egyptian names. Intriguingly, Wilson notes that the idea of an ‘ark’ as a portable god-house was typically Egyptian. He points out that on his military campaigns Tuthmosis III would travel with a portable shrine, which was the cabin of a ceremonial boat housing an image of the god Amon - ‘he who is hidden’ - and Egyptian armies paraded before it, regarding it as their divine protection, in a manner reminiscent of the Israelites subsequent use of the Ark of the Covenant. Like the Israelite Ark, the Egyptian one could be opened only by specially privileged persons, in this case the pharaoh and his most senior priests. Let us also recall that an ark like contraption, which may have been a similar portable shrine, was found by Howard Carter in the tomb of Tutankhamun.
However, if the Hittite Abraham/Moses had been brought up in the Egyptian court then the same could be equally true of the Hittite Nefertiti, whose Egyptian name meant ‘the beautiful one is come’. She may have been quite young when she originally came to the Egyptian court, whether voluntarily or otherwise. Alternatively, she may have already been mature at that time and may have known or had a relationship with Abraham/Moses before arriving at Pharaoh’s court, which the Biblical story of Abraham passing her off as his sister to Pharaoh may allude to.
This last point may link up with Laura and the Chateau crew’s observation, which the C’s confirmed was true, that Abraham/Moses was also Paris in Homer’s account of the Trojan War as set out in the Iliad and the Odyssey, and Nefertiti/Sarah was Helen of Troy:
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: One of the questions we would like to clear up is the issue of the Holy Grail and the Ark. Is the Ark of the Covenant - the ark thing given to the early pre-Mosaic Jews that you have described previously - the same as the Holy Grail?
A: No.
Q: (L) So there are two completely different technologies?
A: If you wish to term it such.
Q: (Galahad) Thanks guys! That's real clear!
A: This is an issue that will clarify itself soon enough.
Q: (L) Is my idea correct that we can identify the presence of these more-or-less technologies by the architecture or art or megalithic structures of the different groups on the planet?
A: To some extent, yes. But do not let that be the only clue. You might consider "lifestyle" as well as the presence and uses of metals; particularly gold vs. iron. [MJF: Gold was used a lot in Ancient Egypt for ornamentation, although it was mined outside of Egypt mainly in Nubia, whereas iron ore was mined and refined in Hittite Anatolia and used for the Hittite’s powerful war chariots and weapons.]
Q: (Galahad) Well, we got that part right. (L) Once before we discussed Nefertiti and Sarah being one and the same person. We have now been discussing the idea, based on some significant clues in ancient documents, that this individual was also Helen of Troy. Is this, in fact, a useful idea to follow? Is it a correct assessment of the clues?
A: Indeed!
Q: (L) That would mean that, according to the story, that Paris/Alexander would be the same individual as Abraham and that Herodotus' story of Paris and Helen sojourning in Egypt was true?
A: Yes.
This revelation opens up a whole new avenue of speculation and potentially links Abraham and Nefertiti to the Trojan War, which rather than taking place in Asia Minor, as the German archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann believed when he discovered what he thought was the ancient city of Troy at Hissarlik in Turkey, occurred instead in what today is Cambridge in England according to Iman Wilkens. Does this then suggest that the Hittites/Levites were Trojan refugees from Britain who had succeeded in escaping the burning city of Troy?
In Homer’s Iliad, Paris, also known as Alexander (Ἀλέξανδρος, Aléxandros), was the son of King Priam and Queen Hecuba of Troy. However, we should probably not take the mythic elements of Homer’s story too seriously here. For example, the account of Paris falling in love with Helen and spiriting her away from her husband King Menelaus of Sparta and taking her to his native city Troy, thereby causing the Trojan War, may simply be a reflection of the story of Abraham/Moses/Paris falling in love with Nefertiti/Sarah/Helen and eloping with her into the Sinai Desert with her cuckolded husband Akhenaten in hot pursuit. Herodotus’s alternative spin on Homer’s original tale with Paris and Helen sojourning in Egypt after their ship was blown off course by a violent storm (echoes perhaps of the rough conditions that prevailed in the eastern Mediterranean as a result of the explosion of Thera) would again appear to be a further reflection on the love story of Abraham/Moses and Nefertiti/Sarah. Is there anything in the historical record to support the idea of there being a Hittite prince by the name of Alexander during the period in question?
Alaksandus of WilusaIn Homer’s Iliad, Paris, also known as Alexander (Ἀλέξανδρος, Aléxandros), was the son of King Priam and Queen Hecuba of Troy. However, we should probably not take the mythic elements of Homer’s story too seriously here. For example, the account of Paris falling in love with Helen and spiriting her away from her husband King Menelaus of Sparta and taking her to his native city Troy, thereby causing the Trojan War, may simply be a reflection of the story of Abraham/Moses/Paris falling in love with Nefertiti/Sarah/Helen and eloping with her into the Sinai Desert with her cuckolded husband Akhenaten in hot pursuit. Herodotus’s alternative spin on Homer’s original tale with Paris and Helen sojourning in Egypt after their ship was blown off course by a violent storm (echoes perhaps of the rough conditions that prevailed in the eastern Mediterranean as a result of the explosion of Thera) would again appear to be a further reflection on the love story of Abraham/Moses and Nefertiti/Sarah. Is there anything in the historical record to support the idea of there being a Hittite prince by the name of Alexander during the period in question?
I recently discovered at my uncle’s house an interesting book on the Hittites by Oliver Gurney, which mentioned an Anatolian kingdom called Wilusa ruled over by a king called Alaksandus circa 1300 BC. You will immediately note that Alaksandus is phonetically similar to Aléxandros and by extension Alexander. Wilusa (or Wilusiya) was a Late Bronze Age city in western Anatolia known from references in fragmentary Hittite records. This ancient city and archaeological site is located at Hisarlik in present-day Turkey. For our purposes, the city is particularly notable for its identification with the archaeological site of Troy (see above), and thus its potential connection to the legendary Trojan War.
In 1924, Emil Forrer, a Swiss Hittologist, suggested that the name Ahhiyawa corresponds to the Homeric term for the Greeks, Achaeans. Forrer's work was primarily motivated by linguistic similarities, since "Wilusa" and the associated placename "Taruisa" show striking parallels to the Greek names "Wilios" and "Troia" respectively. Subsequent research on Hittite geography has lent these identifications additional support and they are now generally accepted by scholars, though they are not regarded as firmly established. One alternative hypothesis proposes that Wilusa was located near Beycesultan, which was known in the Byzantine era as "Iluza" (Ἴλουζα), similar phonetically to Ilium (Latin) or Ilion (Greek).
Carrying on with the Byzantine connection, the book explained that Stephanus of Byzantium* preserved the legend that the town of Samylia in Caria (a region of western Anatolia) had been founded by one Motylos who had received Helen and Paris (presumably on their voyage from Sparta to Troy), which may be reflected perhaps in the historical treaty of vassalage between the Hittite king Mawatalli II and Alaksandus. Alaksandu's obligations under that treaty included both timely intelligence about potential anti-Hittite activity as well as soldiers for military expeditions. Some evidence suggests that Muwatalli invoked this later obligation, as Wilusan soldiers appear to have served in the Hittite army during the Battle of Kadesh (see more below on this).
In 1924, Emil Forrer, a Swiss Hittologist, suggested that the name Ahhiyawa corresponds to the Homeric term for the Greeks, Achaeans. Forrer's work was primarily motivated by linguistic similarities, since "Wilusa" and the associated placename "Taruisa" show striking parallels to the Greek names "Wilios" and "Troia" respectively. Subsequent research on Hittite geography has lent these identifications additional support and they are now generally accepted by scholars, though they are not regarded as firmly established. One alternative hypothesis proposes that Wilusa was located near Beycesultan, which was known in the Byzantine era as "Iluza" (Ἴλουζα), similar phonetically to Ilium (Latin) or Ilion (Greek).
Carrying on with the Byzantine connection, the book explained that Stephanus of Byzantium* preserved the legend that the town of Samylia in Caria (a region of western Anatolia) had been founded by one Motylos who had received Helen and Paris (presumably on their voyage from Sparta to Troy), which may be reflected perhaps in the historical treaty of vassalage between the Hittite king Mawatalli II and Alaksandus. Alaksandu's obligations under that treaty included both timely intelligence about potential anti-Hittite activity as well as soldiers for military expeditions. Some evidence suggests that Muwatalli invoked this later obligation, as Wilusan soldiers appear to have served in the Hittite army during the Battle of Kadesh (see more below on this).
*Stephanus of Byzantium was a 6th century AD Byzantine grammarian and the author of an important geographical dictionary entitled Ethnica (Ἐθνικά), only meagre fragments of which survive, although an epitome, i.e., a summary or miniature form of it, is extant. Nearly every article in the epitome contains a reference to some ancient writer, as an authority for the name of the place.
Although Herodotus claimed they were Minoans, the Carians themselves maintained that they were Anatolian mainlanders and were akin to the Mysians and the Lydians. Interestingly, the Homeric name for the Lydians was Μαίονες, who were cited as being among the allies of the Trojans during the Trojan War. There is today a Turkish town in this region called Selimiye, which to me seems etymologically close to Samylia. This town’s name may therefore be a distant echo of the ancient Carian town of Samylia. As Iman Wilkens has shown, names have a way of surviving even after successive invasions and conquests.
Map of the Near East depicting location of Wilusa in Northwest Anatolia.
Wilusa was apparently part of a confederation of Arzawa or Assuwa. Indeed, Wilusa first appears in the historical record around 1400 BC, when it was one of the twenty-two states of the Assuwa Confederation, which formed in an unsuccessful attempt to oppose the Hittite Empire. The name was recorded in various centres in Mycenaean Greece as Asiwia, which later acquired the form “Asia”. Hence, if you ever wondered where the European name of Asia as representing the Far East came from, this is its root.
King Alaksandus reigned in the late Bronze Age, and thus far too late for Abraham/Moses, but could this king’s name have been cognate with that of the patriarch Abraham in his persona as Paris, who was also known as Alexander? If so, was Wilusa Troy, not the original Troy but a new Troy named after the original city of that name located in England and destroyed at the culmination of the Trojan War in the same way that today’s city of New York in the USA is named after the city of York in England? Although some scholars would like to identify Wilusa with Troy and the Trojan War, others sanction caution in this regard as no one has yet found any historical evidence for any particular event from the Greek legends of Troy, and the Hittite documents themselves do not suggest that Wilusa-Troy was ever attacked by Greeks-Ahhiyawa (Achaeans). Noted Hittitologist Trevor Bryce cautions that our current understanding of Wilusa's history does not provide evidence for there ever having been an actual Trojan War since "the less material one has, the more easily it can be manipulated to fit whatever conclusion one wishes to come up with".
The Dardanians and the TrojansKing Alaksandus reigned in the late Bronze Age, and thus far too late for Abraham/Moses, but could this king’s name have been cognate with that of the patriarch Abraham in his persona as Paris, who was also known as Alexander? If so, was Wilusa Troy, not the original Troy but a new Troy named after the original city of that name located in England and destroyed at the culmination of the Trojan War in the same way that today’s city of New York in the USA is named after the city of York in England? Although some scholars would like to identify Wilusa with Troy and the Trojan War, others sanction caution in this regard as no one has yet found any historical evidence for any particular event from the Greek legends of Troy, and the Hittite documents themselves do not suggest that Wilusa-Troy was ever attacked by Greeks-Ahhiyawa (Achaeans). Noted Hittitologist Trevor Bryce cautions that our current understanding of Wilusa's history does not provide evidence for there ever having been an actual Trojan War since "the less material one has, the more easily it can be manipulated to fit whatever conclusion one wishes to come up with".
The same book also revealed that an Egyptian source confirmed that the ‘Drdny’ (i.e., the Dardanians – as no other similar name is known) fought as allies of the Hittites, like the Wilusans, at the Battle of Kadesh (1274 BC) against the Egyptian forces of Ramesses II. The Dardanoi (Greek: Δάρδανοι; its anglicised modern terms being Dardanians or Dardans) were a legendary people of the Troad, supposedly located in north-western Anatolia (Turkey). The Dardanoi were by legend the descendants of Dardanus, the mythical founder of Dardanus, an ancient city in the Troad. The Dardanelles Strait was named after the Dardanoi, who lived in the region. From our perspective, it is important to note that a contingent of Dardanians figures among Troy's allies in the Trojan War. If the Wilusans were Trojan descendants, then it makes sense that the Dardanians would continue to be allied with them, as they had been during the earlier Trojan War, unless this later event (i.e., the Battle of Kadesh) somehow became superimposed upon Homer’s account due to distance in time.
The Royal House of Troy was also divided into two branches, that of the Dardanoi and that of the Trojans (their city being called Troy, or sometimes Ilion/Ilium). The House of the Dardanoi (its members being the Dardanids, Greek: Δαρδανίδαι; Latin: Dardanidae) was older than the House of Troy, but Troy later became more powerful. Aeneas is referred to in Virgil’s Aeneid interchangeably as a Dardanian or as a Trojan, but strictly speaking, Aeneas was of the branch of the Dardanoi. Many rulers of Rome, for example Julius Caesar and Augustus, claimed descent from Aeneas and the Houses of Troy and Dardania. Homer adds the epithet Dardanides (Δαρδανίδης) to King Priam and to other prominent characters denoting that they are members of the house of the Dardanoi.
According to Wikipedia, the ethnic affinities of the Dardanoi, and of the Trojans, and the nature of their language remain a mystery. This would make sense if they were refugees who migrated to the Dardanelles region after the fall of Troy, their original homeland, and then established themselves in Anatolia as the people who would subsequently be known to the Egyptians and the Mitanni as the Hittites/Dardanians. Their migration to the eastern Mediterranean, possibly via Italy and Illyria, may, of course, have been part of a general Celtic migration from Northern and Northwest Europe after a calamity such as a cometary bombardment similar perhaps to the one which brought about the end of the Western Roman Empire in the 6th Century AD, as confirmed by the C’s. This eastwards migration might also explain the C’s following comments in the session dated 19 February 2000:
The Royal House of Troy was also divided into two branches, that of the Dardanoi and that of the Trojans (their city being called Troy, or sometimes Ilion/Ilium). The House of the Dardanoi (its members being the Dardanids, Greek: Δαρδανίδαι; Latin: Dardanidae) was older than the House of Troy, but Troy later became more powerful. Aeneas is referred to in Virgil’s Aeneid interchangeably as a Dardanian or as a Trojan, but strictly speaking, Aeneas was of the branch of the Dardanoi. Many rulers of Rome, for example Julius Caesar and Augustus, claimed descent from Aeneas and the Houses of Troy and Dardania. Homer adds the epithet Dardanides (Δαρδανίδης) to King Priam and to other prominent characters denoting that they are members of the house of the Dardanoi.
According to Wikipedia, the ethnic affinities of the Dardanoi, and of the Trojans, and the nature of their language remain a mystery. This would make sense if they were refugees who migrated to the Dardanelles region after the fall of Troy, their original homeland, and then established themselves in Anatolia as the people who would subsequently be known to the Egyptians and the Mitanni as the Hittites/Dardanians. Their migration to the eastern Mediterranean, possibly via Italy and Illyria, may, of course, have been part of a general Celtic migration from Northern and Northwest Europe after a calamity such as a cometary bombardment similar perhaps to the one which brought about the end of the Western Roman Empire in the 6th Century AD, as confirmed by the C’s. This eastwards migration might also explain the C’s following comments in the session dated 19 February 2000:
Q: What was the connection between the Hyperboreans, including the Celts of Britain, I believe, and the people of Delos?
A: Northern peoples were responsible for civilising the Meditteranean/Adriatic peoples with the encoded secrets contained within their superior extra-terrestrially based genetic arrangement. Practice of which you speak was multi-trans-generational habit.
Note that they specifically say “extra-terrestrially based genetic arrangement”, which is a curious phrase. Does this refer to their Kantekkian origins or to an off-planet, Orion laboratory hybridisation experiment perhaps even related to the 353535 tribal code?
The Thracians
The remains of the Dardanians material culture reveal close ties with Luwian, and other Anatolian groups, and the Thracians. In his book Where Once Stood Troy, Iman Wilkens argued that the Thracians originally hailed from western Brittany in France rather than Thrace or Thessaly in today’s Greece. Like the Dardanians, the Thracians were allies of the Trojans during the Trojan War according to Homer. Could the Thracians have been the ancient Dardanians?
The Thracians were an Indo-European speaking people who resided mainly in the Balkans (mostly modern-day Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Greece) and other locations in the southeast of Europe, but importantly they were also located in Anatolia. This would have made them close neighbours of the Wilusans (see previous map above).
As Wikipedia explains, the exact origin of Thracians is unknown, but it is believed that proto-Thracians descended from a purported mixture of Proto-Indo-Europeans and Early European Farmers arriving from the rest of Asia and Africa through Asia Minor (Anatolia). This could, of course, just be wishful thinking on the part of scholars.
This proto-Thracian culture developed into the Dacian, Getae and several other smaller Thracian cultures. Thracian culture was described as tribal by the Greeks and Romans, which is similar to the way in which the Romans later described the western European Celts. Interestingly, Xenophanes, a Greek philosopher and poet, writing in the 6th century BC described the Thracians as "blue-eyed and red-haired", which again, if true, is indicative of the Celts (and Scythians). Ancient Greek artwork also tended to depict Thracians as redheads. Among their customs was tattooing, common among both males and females, which again is a practice the Celts widely indulged in. Both the Romans and the Greeks called them barbarians owing to the perceived backwardness of their culture. This perceived primitiveness may be related to their living simple lives in open villages. However, the Romans said the same of the Celts who preferred to live in open villages rather than large walled towns. Intriguingly, the first historical record of the Thracians is found in the Iliad, where they are described as allies of the Trojans in the Trojan War. This brings us back to Iman Wilkens and his contention that the Thracians had come from western Brittany in France. One must be critical here and state that Homer (writing in the eighth century BC) was really a poet not an historian, so relying on him as an authentic historical source is tantamount to relying on Shakespeare as a reliable source for English/British history (think of his historical plays such as Richard III, King Lear and Macbeth for example).
With regard to Homer’s influence on Greek mythology and history, Laura pointed out in her article Jupiter, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce, and the Return of the Mongols, “… the so called “Greek” culture later imposed many of its stories and names on events and places in the Mediterranean. Certainly, the problem is unavoidably complex due to repeated waves of invasion and conquest and mixing of peoples throughout time.” She also pointed out in that article that the name Thrace may derive from the meaning of the adjective “thracus” meaning “courageous”, which may have been a popular epithet of many warrior people who gave the name to their respective regions. Whatever their origins, the Thracians were regarded by other peoples as warlike, ferocious, bloodthirsty, and barbarian. This is certainly borne out by the fact that ancient Greek and Roman historians agreed that the ancient Thracians, who were of Indo-European stock and language (as were the Hittites and Scythians too), were superior fighters, something the Romans also said of the Celts, as did the C’s:
The Thracians were an Indo-European speaking people who resided mainly in the Balkans (mostly modern-day Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Greece) and other locations in the southeast of Europe, but importantly they were also located in Anatolia. This would have made them close neighbours of the Wilusans (see previous map above).
As Wikipedia explains, the exact origin of Thracians is unknown, but it is believed that proto-Thracians descended from a purported mixture of Proto-Indo-Europeans and Early European Farmers arriving from the rest of Asia and Africa through Asia Minor (Anatolia). This could, of course, just be wishful thinking on the part of scholars.
This proto-Thracian culture developed into the Dacian, Getae and several other smaller Thracian cultures. Thracian culture was described as tribal by the Greeks and Romans, which is similar to the way in which the Romans later described the western European Celts. Interestingly, Xenophanes, a Greek philosopher and poet, writing in the 6th century BC described the Thracians as "blue-eyed and red-haired", which again, if true, is indicative of the Celts (and Scythians). Ancient Greek artwork also tended to depict Thracians as redheads. Among their customs was tattooing, common among both males and females, which again is a practice the Celts widely indulged in. Both the Romans and the Greeks called them barbarians owing to the perceived backwardness of their culture. This perceived primitiveness may be related to their living simple lives in open villages. However, the Romans said the same of the Celts who preferred to live in open villages rather than large walled towns. Intriguingly, the first historical record of the Thracians is found in the Iliad, where they are described as allies of the Trojans in the Trojan War. This brings us back to Iman Wilkens and his contention that the Thracians had come from western Brittany in France. One must be critical here and state that Homer (writing in the eighth century BC) was really a poet not an historian, so relying on him as an authentic historical source is tantamount to relying on Shakespeare as a reliable source for English/British history (think of his historical plays such as Richard III, King Lear and Macbeth for example).
With regard to Homer’s influence on Greek mythology and history, Laura pointed out in her article Jupiter, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce, and the Return of the Mongols, “… the so called “Greek” culture later imposed many of its stories and names on events and places in the Mediterranean. Certainly, the problem is unavoidably complex due to repeated waves of invasion and conquest and mixing of peoples throughout time.” She also pointed out in that article that the name Thrace may derive from the meaning of the adjective “thracus” meaning “courageous”, which may have been a popular epithet of many warrior people who gave the name to their respective regions. Whatever their origins, the Thracians were regarded by other peoples as warlike, ferocious, bloodthirsty, and barbarian. This is certainly borne out by the fact that ancient Greek and Roman historians agreed that the ancient Thracians, who were of Indo-European stock and language (as were the Hittites and Scythians too), were superior fighters, something the Romans also said of the Celts, as did the C’s:
Q: (L) Where do the Celts come from?
A: Same. Ferocious people. Came from fifth planet.
Curiously, Plato in his famous work Republic groups the Thracians with the Scythians calling them extravagant and high spirited. In his Laws, he portrays them as a warlike nation, grouping them with Celts, Persians, Scythians, Iberians and Carthaginians. Recall here though that the Carthaginians were originally Phoenicians, who had already settled in Iberia prior to Plato’s era, as had the Milesian Celts (Gaels), who were themselves Scythians, as we learned above.
As Wikipedia admits, the origins of the Thracians remain obscure, in the absence of written historical records before they got into contact with the Greeks. Evidence of proto-Thracians in the prehistoric period depends on artifacts of material culture. It is generally proposed that a proto-Thracian people developed from a mixture of indigenous peoples and Indo-Europeans from the time of Proto-Indo-European expansion in the Early Bronze Age, when the latter, around 1500 BC, mixed with indigenous peoples. However, 1500 BC puts us in the same ballpark as Abraham/Moses, Akhenaten and the eruption of Thera (circa 1600 BC or earlier?), which destroyed the Minoan civilisation. This calamity, followed by a deadly plague, saw large numbers of people on the move all over the Eastern Mediterranean, which means that there is no reason to rule out a similar migration of Celts from locations in northern Europe such as Brittany to places like modern-day Thrace and Anatolia due to some similar catastrophe.
Could a group of Dardanians have migrated from Brittany to Thrace and mixed with the people there to become the Thracians at around the same time as a group of defeated Trojans from England migrated to Wilusa (establishing a new Troy) who in time would be absorbed by the expansionist Hittites? Is this how Abraham/Moses/Paris may have come to be viewed as both a Trojan prince and a Hittite?
Geoffrey of Monmouth and Brutus the TrojanAs Wikipedia admits, the origins of the Thracians remain obscure, in the absence of written historical records before they got into contact with the Greeks. Evidence of proto-Thracians in the prehistoric period depends on artifacts of material culture. It is generally proposed that a proto-Thracian people developed from a mixture of indigenous peoples and Indo-Europeans from the time of Proto-Indo-European expansion in the Early Bronze Age, when the latter, around 1500 BC, mixed with indigenous peoples. However, 1500 BC puts us in the same ballpark as Abraham/Moses, Akhenaten and the eruption of Thera (circa 1600 BC or earlier?), which destroyed the Minoan civilisation. This calamity, followed by a deadly plague, saw large numbers of people on the move all over the Eastern Mediterranean, which means that there is no reason to rule out a similar migration of Celts from locations in northern Europe such as Brittany to places like modern-day Thrace and Anatolia due to some similar catastrophe.
Could a group of Dardanians have migrated from Brittany to Thrace and mixed with the people there to become the Thracians at around the same time as a group of defeated Trojans from England migrated to Wilusa (establishing a new Troy) who in time would be absorbed by the expansionist Hittites? Is this how Abraham/Moses/Paris may have come to be viewed as both a Trojan prince and a Hittite?
Perhaps some tentative support for this idea may be found in Geoffrey of Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain. Written in 1136, it purported to be a story of the early inhabitants of the British Isles covering a sweep of nineteen hundred years, stretching from the mythical Brutus, the great-grandson of the Trojan Aeneas, who was supposed to have given his name to the island of Britain after he landed there in the twelfth century before Christ, down to the last British king, Cadwallader in the 7th Century AD. As Laura has previously mentioned, Geoffrey of Monmouth’s book cannot be taken seriously as an historic work since much of it is based on myth and legend. However, there is always some scintilla of truth behind every myth and legend, and this may well be true of the story of Brutus.
In essence the story of Brutus was taken from the British historian Nennius’s book Historia Brittonum written towards the end of the 8th Century AD. Nennius, a British monk, was drawing on even older sources., including no doubt Roman and, as I mentioned above, the Romans liked to believe they were the descendants of the Trojans. Monmouth writes that after the Trojan War, Aeneas fled the ruined city with his son Ascanius and came to Italy where he and his son settled. His son Ascanius supposedly founded the city of Alba beside the river Tiber (which would go on to become Rome) and was elected king by the people. This narrative therefore ties in well with the Romans’ origin story that they were the descendants of the Trojans. We might also note here that the name “Alba”* just happens to be the same name the Brythonic Celts gave to Scotland before they were in turn conquered by the Scotti (Gaels) who renamed the land Scotia, today Scotland.
In essence the story of Brutus was taken from the British historian Nennius’s book Historia Brittonum written towards the end of the 8th Century AD. Nennius, a British monk, was drawing on even older sources., including no doubt Roman and, as I mentioned above, the Romans liked to believe they were the descendants of the Trojans. Monmouth writes that after the Trojan War, Aeneas fled the ruined city with his son Ascanius and came to Italy where he and his son settled. His son Ascanius supposedly founded the city of Alba beside the river Tiber (which would go on to become Rome) and was elected king by the people. This narrative therefore ties in well with the Romans’ origin story that they were the descendants of the Trojans. We might also note here that the name “Alba”* just happens to be the same name the Brythonic Celts gave to Scotland before they were in turn conquered by the Scotti (Gaels) who renamed the land Scotia, today Scotland.
*Indeed, the oldest name for England would seem to be Albion. The names for Scotland in the Celtic languages were also related to Albion: Alba in Scottish Gaelic, Alba in Irish, and Alban in Welsh, Cornish, and Breton. Could Albion have been Trojan Britain’s original name perhaps?
Brutus was Ascanius’s grandson, and he had a complex backstory which I won’t go into here save to say that he ended up being exiled from Italy and landed up in Greece (Thrace?), where he discovered the descendants of Helenus, King Priam’s son, who had been held captive by the Greeks. In Nennius’s version, Brutus wandered 42 years in Africa [MJF: shades of Abraham/Moses wandering with the Israelites in the Sinai Desert for 40 years] and arrived with his family at Lake Osiers in the country of the Philistines, whereafter he passed through the hills of Syria and then, travelling by river, he passed through Mauretania to the Pillars of Hercules where they discovered further Trojan descendants who joined Brutus and his group. Returning to Geoffrey of Monmouth’s account, Brutus then became the leader of these exiled Trojans and, after numerous bold exploits and battles with the Greeks, he would eventually lead the Trojans to occupy a deserted Britain, save for a few giants here and there, where they would build a second Troy, Troia Nova, later called Trinovantum.
Of course, Geoffrey of Monmouth and Nennius would have placed the original Troy near to Greece or in Asia Minor, in accordance with Homer’s account, and not in Britain where we believe Troy was really located following Iman Wilkens’ alternative view of Homer’s account. Moreover, we should note that in the timeframe Geoffrey of Monmouth and Nennius set Brutus’s tale, the Greeks as we know them today from Homer and classical history had not yet occupied the Peloponnese. However, leaving on one side the clearly mythic nature of this tale, it certainly does create an interesting link between the Trojans and Britain, which impels one to think that there must have been some much earlier oral tradition that had linked Troy and Britain together that Geoffrey of Monmouth and Nennius had been drawing upon. Is it possible that a group of Trojan exiles did reoccupy their former homeland after it had been laid waste by war, famine, plague and natural disaster and reconstituted Troy in what is today Ilford in North-East London? As Laura remarked in her article Jupiter, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce, and the Return of the Mongols Troy was considered the greatest, most resplendent city of its age (akin to Athens and Rome in later ages) so much so that its terrible destruction was an episode that would resound down through the subsequent centuries and even find an echo in the writings of the Jewish Prophet Jeremiah as a byword for Armageddon. It is curious then that the New Troy should be built in what is now London, which even today is still one of the greatest cities of the world and was until 1947 the capitol of a vast world-wide empire. This last point may strangely reflect something Geoffrey of Monmouth said of Brutus, which relates to a dream Brutus had of the goddess:
Of course, Geoffrey of Monmouth and Nennius would have placed the original Troy near to Greece or in Asia Minor, in accordance with Homer’s account, and not in Britain where we believe Troy was really located following Iman Wilkens’ alternative view of Homer’s account. Moreover, we should note that in the timeframe Geoffrey of Monmouth and Nennius set Brutus’s tale, the Greeks as we know them today from Homer and classical history had not yet occupied the Peloponnese. However, leaving on one side the clearly mythic nature of this tale, it certainly does create an interesting link between the Trojans and Britain, which impels one to think that there must have been some much earlier oral tradition that had linked Troy and Britain together that Geoffrey of Monmouth and Nennius had been drawing upon. Is it possible that a group of Trojan exiles did reoccupy their former homeland after it had been laid waste by war, famine, plague and natural disaster and reconstituted Troy in what is today Ilford in North-East London? As Laura remarked in her article Jupiter, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce, and the Return of the Mongols Troy was considered the greatest, most resplendent city of its age (akin to Athens and Rome in later ages) so much so that its terrible destruction was an episode that would resound down through the subsequent centuries and even find an echo in the writings of the Jewish Prophet Jeremiah as a byword for Armageddon. It is curious then that the New Troy should be built in what is now London, which even today is still one of the greatest cities of the world and was until 1947 the capitol of a vast world-wide empire. This last point may strangely reflect something Geoffrey of Monmouth said of Brutus, which relates to a dream Brutus had of the goddess:
“It seemed to him the goddess stood before him and spoke these words to him: ‘Brutus, beyond the setting of the sun, past the realms of Gaul, there lies an island in the sea, once occupied by giants. Now it is empty and ready for your folk. Down the years this will prove an abode suited to you and your people; and to your descendants it will be a second Troy. A race of kings will be born there from your stock and round the circle of the whole earth will be subject to them’.”
This, of course, could have come straight out of Homer or even the Bible (think of Yahweh’s prophecy concerning the seed of Abraham). In a curious way the prophecy would be fulfilled with the rise of the British Empire in the late 16th Century. Could it have been a passage like this that inspired John Dee to persuade Queen Elizabeth I to establish the British Empire?
The Illyrians
However, the Dardanoi or Dardanians were also linked by ancient Greek and Roman writers with the Illyrian people of the same name who lived in the Balkans (i.e. the Dardani), a notion supported by a number of parallel ethnic names found both in the Balkans and Anatolia that are considered too great to be a mere coincidence. Illyrian pirates in the Adriatic would centuries later become a menace to Roman shipping for well over a hundred years, even after the Romans had become the supreme maritime power in the Mediterranean following their crushing defeat of Carthage. If they were originally northern European Celts from Brittany, this makes perfect sense, since the Celts were, along with the Phoenicians, the great mariners of the ancient world.
Tutu Vizier of Egypt and Nefertiti’s Father?
One last point I would make on Wilson’s Biblical observations is that he notes that there was an isolated instance of an 18th Dynasty pharaoh appointing an Asiatic as a vizier. From our point of view, it is very interesting to learn that this pharaoh was Akhenaten. Wilson makes an obvious comparison with the Biblical story of Joseph here save that this man’s name was Tutu.
Is it possible that Tutu could have been Abraham/Moses or, if not, was he perhaps a close relative of Queen Nefertiti? Although we know from the C’s that the Joseph of the Bible was really based on the Scorpion King of Egypt, this does not rule out that the Jews when compiling the Bible during the Babylonian exile may have superimposed elements of the Scorpion King’s story on a real Hebrew/Israelite figure such as the vizier Tutu. Proof of Tutu’s importance can be found in the remains of a rock tomb that was cut for him at El-Amarna (Akhenaten’s new capital city) high in the cliffs overlooking the city, which was one of many such tombs for high-ranking officials of Akhenaten’s court. Although Wilson describes Tutu as a vizier his correct title might be more that of Chamberlain and first servant of the King. In this role he would appear to have been the overseer of all the King’s craftsmen, of all the King’s works in Egypt, of all the King’s silver and gold, of the King’s treasury and finally he was also the chief spokesman of the entire land. The size and quality of Tutu and other high-ranking officials’ tombs amply reflects the importance of their intended owners. However, almost none of these tombs were ever used for the purpose they were constructed for since El-Amarna was abandoned soon after Akhenaten’s death. As Nicholas Reeves in his book Egypt’s False Prophet Akhenaten states “For all their high rank, however, it remains a curious fact that any mentions of these officials beyond the confines of their sepulchres are rare and generally inconsequential. The exception is Tutu, whom we encounter on several occasions as a royal envoy in the Amarna letters: and of course the god’s father Ay, who comes into his own following the accession and early demise of his ward, the tragic Tutankhamun”.
Many Egyptologists consider Ay to have been the father of Nefertiti. His title of “god’s father” could be construed literally as father-in-law to the King, if Nefertiti was in fact his daughter. However, Ay was Egyptian born and raised as was his father Yuya before him, although it is claimed Yuya may have had Syrian ancestry. Moreover, Ay was a prominent official in Amenophis III’s court, the pharaoh possibly being his brother-in-law and therefore Akhenaten’s uncle by marriage. Against this is Nefertiti’s evident foreign, pale-skinned appearance, which can readily be explained if she was in fact a Hittite, as the C’s have proposed. The C’s also suggested that Nefertiti may not have come from a prominent, well known family where ancient history is concerned:
Tutu Vizier of Egypt and Nefertiti’s Father?
One last point I would make on Wilson’s Biblical observations is that he notes that there was an isolated instance of an 18th Dynasty pharaoh appointing an Asiatic as a vizier. From our point of view, it is very interesting to learn that this pharaoh was Akhenaten. Wilson makes an obvious comparison with the Biblical story of Joseph here save that this man’s name was Tutu.
Is it possible that Tutu could have been Abraham/Moses or, if not, was he perhaps a close relative of Queen Nefertiti? Although we know from the C’s that the Joseph of the Bible was really based on the Scorpion King of Egypt, this does not rule out that the Jews when compiling the Bible during the Babylonian exile may have superimposed elements of the Scorpion King’s story on a real Hebrew/Israelite figure such as the vizier Tutu. Proof of Tutu’s importance can be found in the remains of a rock tomb that was cut for him at El-Amarna (Akhenaten’s new capital city) high in the cliffs overlooking the city, which was one of many such tombs for high-ranking officials of Akhenaten’s court. Although Wilson describes Tutu as a vizier his correct title might be more that of Chamberlain and first servant of the King. In this role he would appear to have been the overseer of all the King’s craftsmen, of all the King’s works in Egypt, of all the King’s silver and gold, of the King’s treasury and finally he was also the chief spokesman of the entire land. The size and quality of Tutu and other high-ranking officials’ tombs amply reflects the importance of their intended owners. However, almost none of these tombs were ever used for the purpose they were constructed for since El-Amarna was abandoned soon after Akhenaten’s death. As Nicholas Reeves in his book Egypt’s False Prophet Akhenaten states “For all their high rank, however, it remains a curious fact that any mentions of these officials beyond the confines of their sepulchres are rare and generally inconsequential. The exception is Tutu, whom we encounter on several occasions as a royal envoy in the Amarna letters: and of course the god’s father Ay, who comes into his own following the accession and early demise of his ward, the tragic Tutankhamun”.
Many Egyptologists consider Ay to have been the father of Nefertiti. His title of “god’s father” could be construed literally as father-in-law to the King, if Nefertiti was in fact his daughter. However, Ay was Egyptian born and raised as was his father Yuya before him, although it is claimed Yuya may have had Syrian ancestry. Moreover, Ay was a prominent official in Amenophis III’s court, the pharaoh possibly being his brother-in-law and therefore Akhenaten’s uncle by marriage. Against this is Nefertiti’s evident foreign, pale-skinned appearance, which can readily be explained if she was in fact a Hittite, as the C’s have proposed. The C’s also suggested that Nefertiti may not have come from a prominent, well known family where ancient history is concerned:
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: (L) Previously we were told that Helen was a genetically tweaked Hittite. Were her parents anybody who would be familiar to us outside of mythology?
A: No.
Q: (L) So her parentage was strictly mythical. Was she a member of any esteemed family or royal family along that line as has been claimed?
A: Here also you will make a discovery.
If Nefertiti’s father was Ay, then we know for certain that he came from a prominent Egyptian family that had married into the Egyptian royal family. He was clearly no myth for he would go on to become Pharoah in his own right after Tutankhamun’s death. This leaves me wondering whether Tutu could have been Nefertiti’s father since he fits the picture of a foreigner (an Asiatic) who seems to have come from nowhere to become one of Akhenaten’s most senior and trusted advisors. Could he have owed his rise to prominence perhaps to his relationship with his fellow Asiatic, Queen Nefertiti?
Thera’s Eruption and the Exodus from Egypt
Ian Wilson, like Graham Phillips, connects the Biblical Exodus with the apocalyptic events experienced in Egypt, which they think resulted from the eruption of the Thera volcano, the remnants of which today form the island of Santorini in the Mediterranean Sea. It is important to note here that there was a period of a few years (no one knows how many) between the first major eruption of Thera and the final catastrophic eruption which blew the caldera to pieces, an event which appears to have brought the great Minoan civilisation of Crete to an end overnight and almost did the same for that of ancient Egypt. Wilson tends to place the main eruption in an earlier period than that of Akhenaten, preferring to connect the event to Queen Hatshepsut’s era, since there is evidence that some great misfortune befell Egypt towards the end of her reign. However, there could perhaps have been an ongoing series of eruptions of Thera over many years that eventually culminated in the big one.
Graham Phillip’s View of the Exodus
Phillips dealt with the issue of when the Exodus took place in two of his books, the first being Act of God and the second being The Templars and the Ark of the Covenant. I have, of course, commented from both these books in previous articles. Unlike Ian Wilson, Phillips places the Thera eruption and the ensuing biblical plagues of Egypt in the last year of the reign of Pharoah Amenhotep III’s reign. He was Akhenaten’s father and Akhenaten may well have reigned alongside him by that stage, as this was the established practice when a pharaoh was old and clearly coming towards the end of his reign. Phillips made this deduction when he compared the events described in the Biblical story of the Exodus to the events that occurred after the volcanic eruptions at Krakatau and Mount Saint Helens.
In the Bible, when Pharaoh refused Moses’s demands to let the enslaved Israelites have their freedom, God (Yaheweh) is said to have punished Egypt by a series of what the Bible calls plagues. These were: darkness over the land, the Nile turning to blood, fiery hailstorms, cattle deaths, a plague of boils, and infestations of frogs, lice, flies and locusts. Although these plagues sound the stuff of myth and legend, Phillips’ research showed that these events could certainly have been the result of a natural catastrophe such as a gigantic volcanic eruption. As noted above, first came darkness over the land. Fast forward to the 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens where the sun was obscured for hours even five hundred miles from the volcano. With the even larger eruption of Krakatau near Sumatra in 1883, the skies were darkened to a much greater distance being dark as night for days on end almost a thousand miles away. One should note that the eruption of Thera was exponentially much greater than Krakatau and made Mount Saint Helens look like a firecracker by comparison*. In the Bible narrative, it speaks of three days of thick darkness over all the land of Egypt (MJF: which makes me think of the prophesied three days of darkness Laura once alluded to in the transcripts).
*Krakatau exploded with a force 20 times that of Mount Saint Helens. Where the Mount Saint Helens’ eruption produced a cloud of ash some five miles high, the volcanic cloud that ensued from Krakatau’s eruption rose fifty miles into the air. However, it has been estimated by comparing the size of the resultant craters that Thera’s explosion was almost six times greater than that of Krakatau and the volcanic debris would therefore have been hurled over a hundred miles high, with the ash fallout covering well over a million square miles. To put things in perspective, it would take today 6,000 of the most destructive modern nuclear warheads to equal the explosive magnitude of Thera.
Next Phillips showed how the Biblical thunder, hail and fire that rained upon the land of Egypt, killing all the cattle in the open fields, and breaking every tree was replicated in Krakatau when pellet-sized volcanic debris fell like hail, the fiery pumice setting fires alight on the ground and destroying trees and houses, with lightning flashing around, generated by the tremendous turbulence inside the volcanic cloud. Even after the lesser eruption of Mount Saint Helens, volcanic debris fell like hailstones flattening crops hundred of miles away. This resulted in millions of dollars’ worth of crops being destroyed.
As to the Biblical plague of boils caused by the fine dust blown over all the land of Egypt, the eruption of Mount Saint Helens saw hundreds of people being taken to hospital with skin sores and rashes due to exposure to the acidic fallout and a great deal of livestock perished or had to be destroyed due to prolonged inhalation of the volcanic dust. The ash and dust, which fell like rain, clogged motor vehicle engines, halted trains and aircraft, and blocked roads.
After the Mount Saint Helens’ eruption, fish also died and were found floating on the surface of hundreds of miles of waterways. The pungent odour of pumice permeated everything, and water supplies had to be cut off until the impurities could be filtered from reservoirs. These observed occurrences reflect very closely what was said in Exodus 7:21:
“And the fish that was in the river died: and the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink of the river, and there was blood throughout all the land of Egypt.”
At Krakatau, thousands of tons of red iron oxide were discharged besides the grey pumice ash, killing fish for miles around. If Thera’s eruption also saw huge volumes of iron oxide being discharged, this would certainly explain the reference in Exodus to the Nile turning to blood (Ex 7:20: “And all the waters that were in the river turned to blood”), as large amounts of iron oxide would have turned the river red.
Phillips points out that the remaining plagues may not on first sight suggest they could have anything to do with a volcanic eruption, but he notes that often with a large-scale volcanic eruption, the entire ecosystem can be affected. Although most forms of life suffer from volcanic devastation, remarkably some actually thrive. Hence, when volcanic ash blankets the countryside, crawling invertebrates, and insects in their larval, chrysalis, or egg stage can remain safe underground, as can burrowing snakes and rodents and frogspawn, protected under submerged ledges. Thus, swarming insects are commonly associated with the aftermath of volcanic eruptions and without their natural predators they can reproduce and multiply in huge numbers. This fact can readily account for the swarms of lice, flies and locusts that beset Egypt according to the Biblical narrative set out in Exodus.
As for the Biblical plague of frogs, after the Mount Saint Helens’ eruption, whilst the predatory fish were decimated, the tiny frog eggs survived, and once the hazardous chemicals deposited by the fallout had washed down river, the result was a veritable plague of frogs throughout much of Washington State. They littered the countryside in their thousands with so many being squashed by motor vehicles on the roads that they made driving conditions hazardous. They also clogged waterways, covered gardens and infested houses just as the Biblical account in Exodus 8:2-8 relates.
Whilst Phillips recognises that the biblical plagues of Egypt could have been caused by individual natural phenomena, he points out that the likelihood of them all happening together at the same time seems just too remote for the laws of probability. A volcanic eruption would, however, account for all of them. Phillips does recognise that one problem with attributing the plagues of the Exodus to a volcanic eruption is that the Bible does not present them in the order that they would naturally have occurred in. However, he notes that the Book of Exodus was written many centuries after the events being described. No doubt the account of the plagues would have been handed down orally over many generations and, as a result, the order could easily have been shuffled.
Proof it was Thera Phillips points out that the remaining plagues may not on first sight suggest they could have anything to do with a volcanic eruption, but he notes that often with a large-scale volcanic eruption, the entire ecosystem can be affected. Although most forms of life suffer from volcanic devastation, remarkably some actually thrive. Hence, when volcanic ash blankets the countryside, crawling invertebrates, and insects in their larval, chrysalis, or egg stage can remain safe underground, as can burrowing snakes and rodents and frogspawn, protected under submerged ledges. Thus, swarming insects are commonly associated with the aftermath of volcanic eruptions and without their natural predators they can reproduce and multiply in huge numbers. This fact can readily account for the swarms of lice, flies and locusts that beset Egypt according to the Biblical narrative set out in Exodus.
As for the Biblical plague of frogs, after the Mount Saint Helens’ eruption, whilst the predatory fish were decimated, the tiny frog eggs survived, and once the hazardous chemicals deposited by the fallout had washed down river, the result was a veritable plague of frogs throughout much of Washington State. They littered the countryside in their thousands with so many being squashed by motor vehicles on the roads that they made driving conditions hazardous. They also clogged waterways, covered gardens and infested houses just as the Biblical account in Exodus 8:2-8 relates.
Whilst Phillips recognises that the biblical plagues of Egypt could have been caused by individual natural phenomena, he points out that the likelihood of them all happening together at the same time seems just too remote for the laws of probability. A volcanic eruption would, however, account for all of them. Phillips does recognise that one problem with attributing the plagues of the Exodus to a volcanic eruption is that the Bible does not present them in the order that they would naturally have occurred in. However, he notes that the Book of Exodus was written many centuries after the events being described. No doubt the account of the plagues would have been handed down orally over many generations and, as a result, the order could easily have been shuffled.
Phillips produces a number of arguments based on hard data to prove it could only have been the eruption of Thera that could account for the Biblical plagues of Exodus.
First, he shows that the Vema seabed survey showed that pumice and volcanic debris from the Thera eruption covered the seabed only to the southeast of the volcano, showing that the prevailing wind had carried the fallout cloud right in the direction of Egypt some 500 miles away. Judging from the effects of the smaller Krakatau and Mount Saint Helens eruptions, it is certain that Egypt would have suffered the full horrors of the fallout cloud.
Secondly, over the years the Thera eruption has been variously dated between 1600 and 1300 BC. However, in 1980, a Danish team of scientists publishing data gathered from ice core samples from Greenland were able to demonstrate that there had been a massive volcanic eruption somewhere in the world in 1390 BC, with a margin of era of 50 years either way. The only known large-scale volcanic eruption in that period to have caused the atmospheric conditions recorded in the ice core samples was that of Thera.
Thirdly, on the island of Crete only 70 miles south of Thera (Santorini), archaeologists found evidence of a massive tsunami having struck the densely populated northern coast of Crete (home of the Minoan civilisation), sweeping through its ports and pulverizing its towns and villages. When in the 1930’s the Greek archaeologist Spyridon Marinatos was excavating the site of Amnisos, once the harbour town for the Minoan capitol of Knossos, he uncovered a villa whose walls had been strained outwards in an unusual way with large upright stones seemingly prized out of position by some huge external force, suggesting they may have been hit by the backwash of a n enormous tidal wave. However, he also found an Egyptian artefact that strongly suggested the eruption could not have taken place until at least the reign of the Egyptian pharaoh Amenhotep III (see above) who ruled from circa 1385 to 1360 BC.
Fourth, although there are no surviving written records in Egypt of the Thera eruption in this timeframe (unless we consider the Ipuwer papyrus referred to above to be relating the effects of the eruption and the ensuing woes that followed), Phillips points out that there may be indirect contemporary evidence that an unprecedented catastrophe did occur in the last year of the reign of Amenhotep III, in 1360 BC. In that year, Amenhotep III erected literally hundreds of statues to honour the Egyptian goddess Sekhmet. Phillips tells us that at Asher (N.B. today a common Jewish name), just south of the contemporary Egyptian capitol of Thebes, Amenhotep was in the process of rebuilding a temple to the chief goddess Mut, when he suddenly reconsecrated it as a temple to Sekhmet instead and decreed that Sekhmet should replace Mut as the principal goddess. He subsequently ordered the erection of literally hundreds of statues to the goddess throughout Egypt. As Egyptologist Cyril Aldred pointed out in 1988, no other deity of ancient Egypt is represented by so many large-scale statues and nearly all of them were erected at Amenhotep’s order. As Phillip’s points out, the erection of so many statues of Sekhmet are a clear indication that despite the apparent stability and wealth of the country, something was evidently wrong. This is because Sekhmet was the goddess of devastation.
Phillips notes that the reason why so many monumental statues of Sekhmet exist in such numbers has never been satisfactorily explained. The fact that Amenhotep erected far more statues to Sekhmet than he did to the chief god Amun suggests that something must have occurred to make him question the power of the principal deity. Usually, Sekhmet was represented as a lioness or a woman with a lion’s head. In Egyptian mythology she was the daughter of the sun god Ra and she had once almost annihilated mankind [MJF: was this a folk memory of a near cometary collision or of the rogue planet Venus perhaps coming close to Earth as she did, according to the C’s, at the time of the building of Baalbek?] According to the myth, she had obscured the sun and rained down fire from heaven and humanity was only saved by Ra’s personal intervention. Sekhmet’s mythical vengeance might have been seen as markedly similar to the calamity that would have been caused by the Thera eruption. If Amenhotep believed Sekhmet was responsible for the catastrophe, one can see his erection of all these large-scale statues to her as an attempt to appease her wrath.
Graham Phillips on who was the Real Moses
Like Laura, Phillips rules out the Exodus account that Pharaoh’s daughter adopted Moses as baby and raised him as a prince. As Phillips points out, in Ancient Egypt the bloodline of the royal family was strongly controlled and manipulated. Since the pharaohs were considered gods, their daughters could only conceive children with someone of the king’s choice – this very often being the king himself. Adoption was therefore completely out of the question. Hence, it is inconceivable that a pharaoh’s daughter could have been allowed to adopt a son.
Phillips takes the view that if Moses really was a prince of the Egyptian court, as the Bible states, then he is far more likely to have been a native Egyptian. However, what Phillips does not consider is that the sons of kings of other races, being royal princes of the blood, may have been acceptable for adoption or assimilation into the Egyptian royal household. Certainly this had been the case for foreign princesses since the Amarna letters describe how a peace treaty between Pharaoh Amenhotep II and Artama I, the king of the Mittani, by which both countries hoped to contain the common threat posed by the Hittites, was sealed by a gift to pharaoh of a Mittani princess who would grace pharaoh’s court and no doubt his bed (apparently the first of several foreign ladies who would over the years be sent to the Egyptian court including most probably Nefertiti too).
Continued in Part 3
First, he shows that the Vema seabed survey showed that pumice and volcanic debris from the Thera eruption covered the seabed only to the southeast of the volcano, showing that the prevailing wind had carried the fallout cloud right in the direction of Egypt some 500 miles away. Judging from the effects of the smaller Krakatau and Mount Saint Helens eruptions, it is certain that Egypt would have suffered the full horrors of the fallout cloud.
Secondly, over the years the Thera eruption has been variously dated between 1600 and 1300 BC. However, in 1980, a Danish team of scientists publishing data gathered from ice core samples from Greenland were able to demonstrate that there had been a massive volcanic eruption somewhere in the world in 1390 BC, with a margin of era of 50 years either way. The only known large-scale volcanic eruption in that period to have caused the atmospheric conditions recorded in the ice core samples was that of Thera.
Thirdly, on the island of Crete only 70 miles south of Thera (Santorini), archaeologists found evidence of a massive tsunami having struck the densely populated northern coast of Crete (home of the Minoan civilisation), sweeping through its ports and pulverizing its towns and villages. When in the 1930’s the Greek archaeologist Spyridon Marinatos was excavating the site of Amnisos, once the harbour town for the Minoan capitol of Knossos, he uncovered a villa whose walls had been strained outwards in an unusual way with large upright stones seemingly prized out of position by some huge external force, suggesting they may have been hit by the backwash of a n enormous tidal wave. However, he also found an Egyptian artefact that strongly suggested the eruption could not have taken place until at least the reign of the Egyptian pharaoh Amenhotep III (see above) who ruled from circa 1385 to 1360 BC.
Fourth, although there are no surviving written records in Egypt of the Thera eruption in this timeframe (unless we consider the Ipuwer papyrus referred to above to be relating the effects of the eruption and the ensuing woes that followed), Phillips points out that there may be indirect contemporary evidence that an unprecedented catastrophe did occur in the last year of the reign of Amenhotep III, in 1360 BC. In that year, Amenhotep III erected literally hundreds of statues to honour the Egyptian goddess Sekhmet. Phillips tells us that at Asher (N.B. today a common Jewish name), just south of the contemporary Egyptian capitol of Thebes, Amenhotep was in the process of rebuilding a temple to the chief goddess Mut, when he suddenly reconsecrated it as a temple to Sekhmet instead and decreed that Sekhmet should replace Mut as the principal goddess. He subsequently ordered the erection of literally hundreds of statues to the goddess throughout Egypt. As Egyptologist Cyril Aldred pointed out in 1988, no other deity of ancient Egypt is represented by so many large-scale statues and nearly all of them were erected at Amenhotep’s order. As Phillip’s points out, the erection of so many statues of Sekhmet are a clear indication that despite the apparent stability and wealth of the country, something was evidently wrong. This is because Sekhmet was the goddess of devastation.
Phillips notes that the reason why so many monumental statues of Sekhmet exist in such numbers has never been satisfactorily explained. The fact that Amenhotep erected far more statues to Sekhmet than he did to the chief god Amun suggests that something must have occurred to make him question the power of the principal deity. Usually, Sekhmet was represented as a lioness or a woman with a lion’s head. In Egyptian mythology she was the daughter of the sun god Ra and she had once almost annihilated mankind [MJF: was this a folk memory of a near cometary collision or of the rogue planet Venus perhaps coming close to Earth as she did, according to the C’s, at the time of the building of Baalbek?] According to the myth, she had obscured the sun and rained down fire from heaven and humanity was only saved by Ra’s personal intervention. Sekhmet’s mythical vengeance might have been seen as markedly similar to the calamity that would have been caused by the Thera eruption. If Amenhotep believed Sekhmet was responsible for the catastrophe, one can see his erection of all these large-scale statues to her as an attempt to appease her wrath.
Graham Phillips on who was the Real Moses
Like Laura, Phillips rules out the Exodus account that Pharaoh’s daughter adopted Moses as baby and raised him as a prince. As Phillips points out, in Ancient Egypt the bloodline of the royal family was strongly controlled and manipulated. Since the pharaohs were considered gods, their daughters could only conceive children with someone of the king’s choice – this very often being the king himself. Adoption was therefore completely out of the question. Hence, it is inconceivable that a pharaoh’s daughter could have been allowed to adopt a son.
Phillips takes the view that if Moses really was a prince of the Egyptian court, as the Bible states, then he is far more likely to have been a native Egyptian. However, what Phillips does not consider is that the sons of kings of other races, being royal princes of the blood, may have been acceptable for adoption or assimilation into the Egyptian royal household. Certainly this had been the case for foreign princesses since the Amarna letters describe how a peace treaty between Pharaoh Amenhotep II and Artama I, the king of the Mittani, by which both countries hoped to contain the common threat posed by the Hittites, was sealed by a gift to pharaoh of a Mittani princess who would grace pharaoh’s court and no doubt his bed (apparently the first of several foreign ladies who would over the years be sent to the Egyptian court including most probably Nefertiti too).
Continued in Part 3
Abraham, Moses, Akhenaten, Meritaten and the Cassiopaeans Part 3
Crown Prince Tuthmose of Egypt
“(right)...the king's son the sem-priest Djhutmose; (left) I am the servant of this noble god, his miller; (front) Incense for the Ennead of the western necropolis.”
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: The story about the plague that is told in Manetho, was this a plague as in leprosy, a disease, or something else?
A: It was multiple elements including leprosy.
Q: (L) What were these different elements?
A: Consider the writings about cometary showers.
[…]
Q: (L) Did Helen/Nefertiti/Sarah get some sort of sickness that contributed to the necessity of locking her up?
A: No, in fact it was the fact that she did not get sick that made her the object of suspicion.
Q: (L) So, she didn't get leprosy.
Q: (L) We have the brother issue to deal with. We have Abraham and his nephew, Lot. Then we have Moses and Aaron, Jacob and Esau, Isaac and Ishmael. Were all of these sets of brothers just different aspects or views on the same stories, a set of singular individuals, whether brothers or not?
A: Pretty much though with added elements from other stories blended in.
Q: (L) Was it a brother/brother relationship as in actual brothers?
A: No. The "brother" relationship was created to legitimize a "false" line of transmission.
Q: (L) So there wasn't a brother, or Aaronic relationship present, assuming any part of that story was true. Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Who was Hagar the Egyptian?
A: Princess of Egypt.
Q: (L) Was she Sarah's maid?
A: No.
Q: (L) Was she Sarah's daughter?
A: Right nurture to.
Q: (L) What do you mean? I don't understand.
A: Sara's daughter by Akhenaten
And
A: And who was "Kore?"
Q: (L) Was this Abraham's daughter?
A: It was the last living member of the Perseid family.
Q: (L) Was it a male or female?
A: Female.
Q: (L) And how did Abraham come to be in possession of this female?
A: Search the text and you will see.
Q: (Galahad) If this person was the last member of the Perseid family, does that mean that Paris was a member of this family?
A: No.
Session 23 August 2001:
Q: (L) So, from 1627 BC to 1588 BC - that's 39 years - almost exactly 40 years of "wandering in the desert," so to say. So they must have escaped when Thera blew and forty years later, the comets came. What was Abraham and his crew doing during that time?
A: Bedouins.
Q: (L) How many were in this tribe?
A: 623.
Q: (L) So it wasn't multiple thousands of people as the Bible would have us believe.
Quoting also from a book called Tutankhamun the Exodus Conspiracy by Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald:
“For example, [the fortress of Per-Atum (Pr-Itm)] features in a dispatch made by an Egyptian official of the region during the reign of [Pharaoh] Merneptah:
…. This is a dispatch for [my master’s] information … to wit, we have finished admitting the Shasu-tribes of Edom (through) the fortress of Merneptah-hotpe-hi-ma’at which is (in) Tjekku to the water holes of [Pr-Itm] the house of Atum-of- Merneptah which are in Tjekku, for their own subsistence and that of their flocks.
Here in the so called Merneptah Stela we gain a glimpse of the manner in which ‘Shasu tribes’ – the name given to pastoral nomads, or ancient Bedouin – were able in times of hardship to enter Egyptian territory in order to graze their herds on its more fertile pastures. For this privilege they would come all the way from Edom, a mountainous region north of the Gulf of Aqaba and east of the Dead Sea, in the Transjordan.”
Session 20 August 2001:
Q: All right, first question is, what is the origin of the Levites?
A: Hittites Moon Worshippers.
Session 3 October 1998:
Q: Who was worshipped by the people who built Stonehenge?
A: Complicated.
Q: Give me some key words to work it out.
A: Spirits, stars, energy.
King David and the Levites
Continuing with the session dated 23 August 2001:
Q: (L) When did this tribe finally arrive in Israel and settle down. Was this after 40 years living as Bedouins?
A: Pretty much.
Q: (L) Well, I still have to deal with this King David issue. He was like a Robin Hood. Now, in another direction, what's this deal about Abraham talking to God. Is this where the whole monotheism came in?
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, it started out with Abraham and his tribe. Did he have reinforcements of his Levite brothers who came and joined his tribe from Hittite land?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Are there any details of this story that I haven't covered that I ought to?
A: David was a Levite.
Q: (L) Was he of the line of Abraham?
A: No.
Q: (L) Did he come from "Hittite land?"
A: Close.
Q: (L) How many generations before he was born did his family come to the area of Palestine?
A: 5.
Q: (L) Were they relatives of Abraham?
A: Somewhat.
Q: (L) Distantly related. So, what did David do? Came along and gathered the people together?
A: Yes.
Session 13 November 1999:
Q: Who were the Levites?
A: Sect of monk-like pacifists. Connected to Moses.
Q: Well, that doesn't make a lot of sense. They sure did a lot of warmongering and they were behind all the rules and regulations that the Jews followed and that was behind the orders to massacre entire races of. That doesn't seem to make sense at all!
A: Oh yes it does. Pacifists can be managers, not slaves.
Moses the Egyptian Levite
“Amenophis [probably Akhenaten here], the wise man and the prophet, was afraid that the gods would be angry at him and at the king, if there should appear to have been violence offered them [i.e., ‘the wise priests’].
Knowing full well the consequences of his words, he predicted that ‘certain people would come to the assistance of these polluted wretches’, who would rise up, depose the king and remain in charge of the kingdom for thirteen years.
Q: If the Levites were the Hittite Moon worshipers, how come Akhenaten, who hung out with Nefertiti, instituted Sun worship? That doesn't make sense.
A: Future Ho into.
Q: Future what into?
A: Ho.
Q: HO must stand for something. I don't understand. Was Nefertiti responsible for Akhenaten's Sun worship?
A: Mostly.
Q: Well why did it turn into Sun worship instead of Moon worship?
A: Future honour of Ra. Go 353535. Deity.
Q: So in other words they were laying a foundation for future layering of other concepts?
A: Yes.
Q: Was the Temple on Crete at Knossos, was it really a necropolis as Wunderlich suggests?
A: 5th density waiting room.
Q: Did they sacrifice humans there?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they sacrifice animals?
A: Yes.
Q: What animals were they sacrificing, and to whom?
A: Apis Bull in part.
Q: What was the other part?
A: Haho 353535
Q: "Ho" must be a name. Is Ho a name of a god?
A: HOH 353535
Q: (T) Is it water? (L) Is it like Hawah? (A) HOH water?
A: Remember Irish pig.
Quoting from Wikipedia on this last point:
The Aten’s other titles and forms of address were in fact identical to those used for the Hebrew god (see below).
Great Hymn to the Aten - Wikipedia
Psalm 104 - Wikipedia
*Eventually even the sun disc depictions of Aten were prohibited in an edict issued by Akhenaten
The Tomb of Aper-el
Crown Prince Tuthmose of Egypt
For Phillips, there was one Egyptian prince from Amenhotep III’s reign who had much in common with Moses and that was Prince Tuthmose – whose name means “son of [the god] Thoth.
He notes that not much is known about Tuthmose but enough Egyptian inscriptions have survived to provide a brief outline of his life. He was Amenhotep’s eldest son and heir to the throne. As a you young man, he acted as governor of Memphis in northern Egypt before being appointed commander of the king’s chariot forces and seeing active service against the Ethiopians. After a successful campaign, he turned to the religious life and was installed as a high priest at the temple of the god Ra in Heliopolis in northern Egypt [MJF: Wikipedia suggests though that he was appointed as High Priest of Ptah in Memphis]. Thutmose was certainly groomed from childhood to one day take over the reins of power when his father became one with the gods. A limestone relief from the Shrine of Apis at Saqqara, now at the Neues Museum, Berlin, shows the prince standing behind the pharaoh making offerings in the role of High Priest of Ptah at Memphis, known anciently as Men-nefer.
However, in the 23rd year of Amenhotep’s reign he suddenly, and for no given reason, resigned his position as a high priest and mysteriously disappeared. Two years later, when Amenhotep’s reign ended, it was Akhenaten, not Tuthmose, who ascended the throne. This seems somewhat peculiar unless perhaps Tuthmose was not a blood son of Amenhotep but an adopted prince from another royal family. However, his Wikipedia entry provides that he was the son of Amenhotep III and Queen Tiye and he appears to have died during the third decade of Amenhotep III's kingship, fairly late in his reign. However, although Tuthmose’s tomb was discovered in the 19th Century (see more on this below), it was empty.
A small schist statuette in the louvre Museum (see above) shows the prince as a miller. The miller statuette is inscribed on three sides with this text:
He notes that not much is known about Tuthmose but enough Egyptian inscriptions have survived to provide a brief outline of his life. He was Amenhotep’s eldest son and heir to the throne. As a you young man, he acted as governor of Memphis in northern Egypt before being appointed commander of the king’s chariot forces and seeing active service against the Ethiopians. After a successful campaign, he turned to the religious life and was installed as a high priest at the temple of the god Ra in Heliopolis in northern Egypt [MJF: Wikipedia suggests though that he was appointed as High Priest of Ptah in Memphis]. Thutmose was certainly groomed from childhood to one day take over the reins of power when his father became one with the gods. A limestone relief from the Shrine of Apis at Saqqara, now at the Neues Museum, Berlin, shows the prince standing behind the pharaoh making offerings in the role of High Priest of Ptah at Memphis, known anciently as Men-nefer.
However, in the 23rd year of Amenhotep’s reign he suddenly, and for no given reason, resigned his position as a high priest and mysteriously disappeared. Two years later, when Amenhotep’s reign ended, it was Akhenaten, not Tuthmose, who ascended the throne. This seems somewhat peculiar unless perhaps Tuthmose was not a blood son of Amenhotep but an adopted prince from another royal family. However, his Wikipedia entry provides that he was the son of Amenhotep III and Queen Tiye and he appears to have died during the third decade of Amenhotep III's kingship, fairly late in his reign. However, although Tuthmose’s tomb was discovered in the 19th Century (see more on this below), it was empty.
A small schist statuette in the louvre Museum (see above) shows the prince as a miller. The miller statuette is inscribed on three sides with this text:
“(right)...the king's son the sem-priest Djhutmose; (left) I am the servant of this noble god, his miller; (front) Incense for the Ennead of the western necropolis.”
However, as Phillip’s points out, Prince Tuthmose does fit the profile of Moses quite nicely in a number of ways. First, he commanded the army during the Ethiopian campaign. So also did Moses in the Biblical account. Although the Bible tells us virtually nothing about Moses’ life as an Egyptian prince, the Jewish historian Josephus writing in the 1st Century AD provided a whole chapter on the subject in his book Jewish Antiquities where we are told that Moses was appointed by the pharaoh as commander of an army, he sent to fight the Ethiopians. It was Moses’ success in that campaign that led to his exile since Pharaoh, jealous of his popularity among the soldiers, eventually orders his arrest, but after being forewarned, Moses escapes to the country. This account certainly makes more sense than the Biblical one in Exodus, which simply has Moses fleeing Egypt after saving an Israelite’s life by killing a vicious slave driver. As Phillips rightly indicates, an Egyptian prince could have ordered a common slave driver killed on the spot with total impunity if he so desired.
The second similarity between Moses and Prince Tuthmose is that for a time Tuthmose was a high priest at the temple of Ra in Heliopolis. So also, it seems was Moses. According to an account Josephus found in the work of the Egyptian historian Manetho writing in the 4th Century BC of a revolt that was said to have taken place in the city of Avaris among Semitic slaves (the Hyksos) during the reign of a pharaoh called Amenophis (the Greek version of Amenhotep). According to Manetho, Amenophis was advised to purge the country of “undesirables” and to set them to work in the stone quarries of Avaris. Apparently, for many years these people were forced to work as slaves until they were joined by a priest from the temple of Ra in Heliopolis. It seems this priest had abandoned the gods of Egypt and had been condemned to bondage. Manetho adds that this priest had once been a soldier and during his captivity in Avaris, he trained the “undesirables” to be soldiers. Although the “undesirables” were not named, nor was their homeland, and the priest was referred to as Osarseph, which simply means “leader”. Josephus drew the conclusion that Manetho's Hyksos were the Jews of the Exodus, although Manetho himself made no such connection, and he was also in no doubt that the “undesirables” were the Israelites and Osarseph was Moses. Indeed, towards the end of the story Manetho even reports that Osarseph took the name "Moses"*.
*If the story is an original part of Manetho's history of Egypt and not added later, the question arises of where he could have heard it, as the Greek Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Torah (i.e., the Exodus narrative) had not been made when he was writing. It is possible that he had an oral (Jewish) informant, or possibly an otherwise unknown pre-Septuagint translation.
Phillips points out that if Moses was the priest who appears in Manetho’s work, then Tuthmose did indeed seem to fit the bill. Manetho also tells us that the priest concerned was a servitor at the temple of Ra in Heliopolis before he abandoned the Egyptian gods, which he claims was precisely the position that Prince Tuthmose held before he disappeared.
However, there is one further fact that may establish a strong link with Tuthmose/ Osarseph and the reigns of Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaten and that was the fact that Manetho’s story depicts Osarseph as a renegade Egyptian priest who leads an army of lepers and other unclean people against the pharaoh. According to Josephus, Manetho described Osarseph as a tyrannical high priest** of Osiris at Heliopolis. Pharaoh Amenophis had a desire to see the gods, but in order to do so he first had to cleanse Egypt of lepers and other polluted people, setting 80,000 of them to work in the stone quarries, and then confining them to Avaris, the former Hyksos capital in the Eastern Delta. There Osarseph became their leader and ordered them to give up the worship of the gods and eat the meat of the holy animals [MJF: a practice which had been forbidden by Akhenaten but was, of course, practised by the Israelites]. As Wikipedia notes, an influential study by Egyptologist Jan Assmann has suggested that no single historical incident or person lies behind the legend, and that it represents instead a conflation of several historical traumas, notably the religious reforms of Akhenaten (Amenophis IV), into a shared folk memory. He suggests instead that the Exodus narrative combines, among other things, the expulsion of the Hyksos (a Semitic people), the religious revolution of Akhenaten, the experiences of the Habiru (gangs of antisocial elements found throughout the ancient Near East), and the large-scale migrations of the Sea Peoples into "a coherent story that is fictional as to its composition but historical as to some of its components."
**Recall here that the C’s said that Moses was eventually toppled as the leader of the Israelites because he had become tyrannical. Perhaps this reference in Manetho to Osarseph’s tyranny is a reflection of Moses’s domineering nature. In another passage in the Bible, Moses when meeting with God (Yahweh) was instantly stricken by him with leprosy and then just as quickly cured. Could this reflect the fact that Moses may have had leprosy himself but was cured by one of the Lizard beings who was posing as Yahweh? Could this be another possible reason why Moses hid his face?
We also know from the C’s that leprosy was rife in Egypt during the reign of Akhenaten and possibly during the last years of his father Amenhotep III’s reign:
The second similarity between Moses and Prince Tuthmose is that for a time Tuthmose was a high priest at the temple of Ra in Heliopolis. So also, it seems was Moses. According to an account Josephus found in the work of the Egyptian historian Manetho writing in the 4th Century BC of a revolt that was said to have taken place in the city of Avaris among Semitic slaves (the Hyksos) during the reign of a pharaoh called Amenophis (the Greek version of Amenhotep). According to Manetho, Amenophis was advised to purge the country of “undesirables” and to set them to work in the stone quarries of Avaris. Apparently, for many years these people were forced to work as slaves until they were joined by a priest from the temple of Ra in Heliopolis. It seems this priest had abandoned the gods of Egypt and had been condemned to bondage. Manetho adds that this priest had once been a soldier and during his captivity in Avaris, he trained the “undesirables” to be soldiers. Although the “undesirables” were not named, nor was their homeland, and the priest was referred to as Osarseph, which simply means “leader”. Josephus drew the conclusion that Manetho's Hyksos were the Jews of the Exodus, although Manetho himself made no such connection, and he was also in no doubt that the “undesirables” were the Israelites and Osarseph was Moses. Indeed, towards the end of the story Manetho even reports that Osarseph took the name "Moses"*.
*If the story is an original part of Manetho's history of Egypt and not added later, the question arises of where he could have heard it, as the Greek Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Torah (i.e., the Exodus narrative) had not been made when he was writing. It is possible that he had an oral (Jewish) informant, or possibly an otherwise unknown pre-Septuagint translation.
Phillips points out that if Moses was the priest who appears in Manetho’s work, then Tuthmose did indeed seem to fit the bill. Manetho also tells us that the priest concerned was a servitor at the temple of Ra in Heliopolis before he abandoned the Egyptian gods, which he claims was precisely the position that Prince Tuthmose held before he disappeared.
However, there is one further fact that may establish a strong link with Tuthmose/ Osarseph and the reigns of Amenhotep III and his son Akhenaten and that was the fact that Manetho’s story depicts Osarseph as a renegade Egyptian priest who leads an army of lepers and other unclean people against the pharaoh. According to Josephus, Manetho described Osarseph as a tyrannical high priest** of Osiris at Heliopolis. Pharaoh Amenophis had a desire to see the gods, but in order to do so he first had to cleanse Egypt of lepers and other polluted people, setting 80,000 of them to work in the stone quarries, and then confining them to Avaris, the former Hyksos capital in the Eastern Delta. There Osarseph became their leader and ordered them to give up the worship of the gods and eat the meat of the holy animals [MJF: a practice which had been forbidden by Akhenaten but was, of course, practised by the Israelites]. As Wikipedia notes, an influential study by Egyptologist Jan Assmann has suggested that no single historical incident or person lies behind the legend, and that it represents instead a conflation of several historical traumas, notably the religious reforms of Akhenaten (Amenophis IV), into a shared folk memory. He suggests instead that the Exodus narrative combines, among other things, the expulsion of the Hyksos (a Semitic people), the religious revolution of Akhenaten, the experiences of the Habiru (gangs of antisocial elements found throughout the ancient Near East), and the large-scale migrations of the Sea Peoples into "a coherent story that is fictional as to its composition but historical as to some of its components."
**Recall here that the C’s said that Moses was eventually toppled as the leader of the Israelites because he had become tyrannical. Perhaps this reference in Manetho to Osarseph’s tyranny is a reflection of Moses’s domineering nature. In another passage in the Bible, Moses when meeting with God (Yahweh) was instantly stricken by him with leprosy and then just as quickly cured. Could this reflect the fact that Moses may have had leprosy himself but was cured by one of the Lizard beings who was posing as Yahweh? Could this be another possible reason why Moses hid his face?
We also know from the C’s that leprosy was rife in Egypt during the reign of Akhenaten and possibly during the last years of his father Amenhotep III’s reign:
Session 2 February 2003:
Q: The story about the plague that is told in Manetho, was this a plague as in leprosy, a disease, or something else?
A: It was multiple elements including leprosy.
Q: (L) What were these different elements?
A: Consider the writings about cometary showers.
[…]
Q: (L) Did Helen/Nefertiti/Sarah get some sort of sickness that contributed to the necessity of locking her up?
A: No, in fact it was the fact that she did not get sick that made her the object of suspicion.
Q: (L) So, she didn't get leprosy.
Apart from Manetho, several other ancient, non-biblical sources seem to parallel the biblical Exodus narrative or the events which occurred at the end of the eighteenth dynasty when the new religion of Akhenaten was denounced, and his capital city of Amarna was abandoned. These tales often combine elements of the Hyksos expulsion. For example, Hecataeus of Abdera (c. 320 BC) tells how the Egyptians blamed a plague on foreigners and expelled them from the country, whereupon Moses, their leader, took them to Canaan.
To support the argument further that Tuthmose had gone into exile, Phillips points out that it is a known fact that Tuthmose’s tomb was never used. In the early 19th Century, the Italian explorer Giovanni Belzoni discovered Tuthmose’s tomb at the far end of the Valley of the Kings. We should note here that Egyptian royal tombs were prepared while the owner was still alive, only the final funerary decorations were added after death. Curiously, in this case Tuthmose’s tomb was finished, but the usual illustrations depicting the owner’s funeral and mummification were absent. This meant that the tomb weas empty not because it had been robbed but because it had never been used. Why not? Phillips argues that coupled with Tuthmose’s sudden and unexplained disappearance from the temple of Ra, and the lack of any memorial or obituaries, the empty tomb suggests that Tuthmose had been disgraced in some way and had either been executed or driven inro exile. However, did Prince Tuthmose abandon the Egyptian gods and his name because he had contracted leprosy and was exiled to Avaris for that reason and effectively condemned by his father Amenhotep III to a slow lingering death and historical obscurity (MJF: in the ancient world and even up to the Middle Ages, lepers were treated as social outcasts and had to abandon their families to live in leper colonies). This would certainly explain his empty tomb and the lack of any memorial or obituary for him, as he had by then become a virtual non-person.
One might also query whether in his new guise as Abraham/Moses, Prince Tuthmose had already been in contact with the Cassiopaeans at this time, who may have given him a whole new world vision, a new cosmology? If so, this might explain why Tuthmose dropped the divine “Tuth” (Thoth) from his name, to be called simply “Mose”, which is the original rendering of the name “Moses”.
The False Brother RelationshipTo support the argument further that Tuthmose had gone into exile, Phillips points out that it is a known fact that Tuthmose’s tomb was never used. In the early 19th Century, the Italian explorer Giovanni Belzoni discovered Tuthmose’s tomb at the far end of the Valley of the Kings. We should note here that Egyptian royal tombs were prepared while the owner was still alive, only the final funerary decorations were added after death. Curiously, in this case Tuthmose’s tomb was finished, but the usual illustrations depicting the owner’s funeral and mummification were absent. This meant that the tomb weas empty not because it had been robbed but because it had never been used. Why not? Phillips argues that coupled with Tuthmose’s sudden and unexplained disappearance from the temple of Ra, and the lack of any memorial or obituaries, the empty tomb suggests that Tuthmose had been disgraced in some way and had either been executed or driven inro exile. However, did Prince Tuthmose abandon the Egyptian gods and his name because he had contracted leprosy and was exiled to Avaris for that reason and effectively condemned by his father Amenhotep III to a slow lingering death and historical obscurity (MJF: in the ancient world and even up to the Middle Ages, lepers were treated as social outcasts and had to abandon their families to live in leper colonies). This would certainly explain his empty tomb and the lack of any memorial or obituary for him, as he had by then become a virtual non-person.
One might also query whether in his new guise as Abraham/Moses, Prince Tuthmose had already been in contact with the Cassiopaeans at this time, who may have given him a whole new world vision, a new cosmology? If so, this might explain why Tuthmose dropped the divine “Tuth” (Thoth) from his name, to be called simply “Mose”, which is the original rendering of the name “Moses”.
If Tuthmose was Abraham/Moses, then he could not have been the actual or blood brother of Akhenaten, who succeeded his father as pharaoh, since the C’s told us that Abraham was a Hittite, not an Egyptian. Graham Phillips also takes this line and does not consider Prince Tuthmose to have been Amenhotep III’s true son. This may be borne out by what the Cs said in the session dated 2 February 2003:
Q: (L) We have the brother issue to deal with. We have Abraham and his nephew, Lot. Then we have Moses and Aaron, Jacob and Esau, Isaac and Ishmael. Were all of these sets of brothers just different aspects or views on the same stories, a set of singular individuals, whether brothers or not?
A: Pretty much though with added elements from other stories blended in.
Q: (L) Was it a brother/brother relationship as in actual brothers?
A: No. The "brother" relationship was created to legitimize a "false" line of transmission.
Q: (L) So there wasn't a brother, or Aaronic relationship present, assuming any part of that story was true. Is that it?
A: Yes.
Although the above seems to be focused on the brother relationship between Moses and Aaron, it does not readily explain the idea of a false line of transmission since in the Bible Aaron was supposed to have been the actual brother of Moses. As brothers, they would have represented the same line of transmission. Of course, in the Bible Abraham’s seed was intended to be the true line of transmission through Isaac and Jacob. However, the C’s have hinted that the true line of transmission was instead the Perseid line that ran through Akhenaten (not Nefertiti) and was preserved in the last living of member of that line who was Kore, who I have suggested is Meritaten, the Biblical Hagar, who the C’s told us was a princess of Egypt rather than the slave girl or servant portrayed in the Bible:
Q: (L) Who was Hagar the Egyptian?
A: Princess of Egypt.
Q: (L) Was she Sarah's maid?
A: No.
Q: (L) Was she Sarah's daughter?
A: Right nurture to.
Q: (L) What do you mean? I don't understand.
A: Sara's daughter by Akhenaten
And
A: And who was "Kore?"
Q: (L) Was this Abraham's daughter?
A: It was the last living member of the Perseid family.
Q: (L) Was it a male or female?
A: Female.
Q: (L) And how did Abraham come to be in possession of this female?
A: Search the text and you will see.
Q: (Galahad) If this person was the last member of the Perseid family, does that mean that Paris was a member of this family?
A: No.
If Paris is Abraham/Moses, as the C’s have confirmed elsewhere, and he in turn was Prince Tuthmose, then the C’s are making it quite clear that he was not a member of the Perseid family, meaning he could not have been Akhenaten’s blood brother, since this would necessarily have made him a Perseid like Akhenaten, the father of Meritaten/Hagar, who they are suggesting was the last living member of the Perseid line until she later gave birth to Ishmael.
Of course, Tuthmose may have been Akhenaten’s true brother and have died of natural causes just as Egyptologists claim and he was therefore never Abraham/Moses or Osarseph, all this being just a well-constructed red herring. If so, Osarseph could still have been Abraham/Moses but he would therefore have been someone else entirely who we still need to identify. If that is the case, we will need to show how Abraham/Moses came to know Queen Nefertiti before he eloped with her and then slept with her daughter. To have had such intimate access to the Queen of Egypt and her daughter, particularly during the Amarna Period when the royal family lived in virtual isolation away from the main cities of Egypt, would have required someone who had great influence and high position at court. One possibility is that Tuthmose and Akhenaten were still blood brothers who shared the same father, Amenhotep III, but had different mothers, with the Perseid line running through Akhenaten’s mother rather than Tuthmose’s. However, Egyptologists hold fast that Queen Tiye was the mother of both princes.
Akhenaten’s Great Queen Tiye has herself an interesting family background, which could have included Syrian ancestry just a few generations back, at a time when the Hittites were more and more encroaching on northern Syria and creating vassal kingdoms that owed their allegiance or suzerainty to the king of the Hittites, thus provoking trouble with imperial Egypt, which viewed Syria as its fiefdom. This Syrian/Asiatic link could theoretically have provided a Hittite ancestry for both Tuthmose and Akhenaten, as sons of Queen Tiye, but it is still stretching things to view them as Hittites rather than as Egyptians for the reality is, they were born in Egypt and raised as Egyptian princes.
Nevertheless, the hard fact remains that Thutmose’s tomb in the Valley of the Kings was found to be empty, with no evidence of the grave having ever been robbed, and no mummy for him has been found to this day. So, we must ask the question, was Tuthmose the person the C’s have said was Abraham/Moses/Paris and, if so, could he have also been the renegade priest Osaresph who led a revolt against pharaoh and took a gang of Semitic Habiru (Apiru), Hebrew or Shasu into the Sinai with him?
Graham Phillips in his book Act of God provides one final clue that may suggest that Prince Tuthmose was not Amenhotep III’s real son. Phillips points out that the last we hear of Tuthmose, was when he officiated in his capacity as the High Priest at the Temple of Ptah with his father Amenhotep III at the burial of the sacred Apis Bull. Apart from an ivory whip found in Tutankhamun’s tomb, which apparently Tuthmose used as commander of the King’s chariot forces, nothing more is heard of him. Thus, it is difficult to tell how much earlier than Akhenaten’s reign Tuthmose disappears, as only one reference to Akhenaten survives from the period before he became pharaoh. This reference is to the wine-jar seal found among the ruins of Malkata Palace, which refers to “the estate of the true king’s son Amenhotep”. For Phillips, it is intriguing that Akhenaten under his original name of Amenhotep is described here as the true king’s son, as this implies that someone else was not. Could this have been a deliberate slight against Tuthmose? When you take this written evidence and the fact that Tuthmose rock-cut tomb was suddenly abandoned, it does suggest that like the Biblical Moses, Tuthmose had somehow fallen from royal favour (assuming here that he had not died, as most mainstream Egyptologists believe). If Moses had really been brought up a royal prince in Egypt during the reign of Amenhotep III, then for Phillips, Thutmose is the only known historical figure who fits the profile.
The ShasuOf course, Tuthmose may have been Akhenaten’s true brother and have died of natural causes just as Egyptologists claim and he was therefore never Abraham/Moses or Osarseph, all this being just a well-constructed red herring. If so, Osarseph could still have been Abraham/Moses but he would therefore have been someone else entirely who we still need to identify. If that is the case, we will need to show how Abraham/Moses came to know Queen Nefertiti before he eloped with her and then slept with her daughter. To have had such intimate access to the Queen of Egypt and her daughter, particularly during the Amarna Period when the royal family lived in virtual isolation away from the main cities of Egypt, would have required someone who had great influence and high position at court. One possibility is that Tuthmose and Akhenaten were still blood brothers who shared the same father, Amenhotep III, but had different mothers, with the Perseid line running through Akhenaten’s mother rather than Tuthmose’s. However, Egyptologists hold fast that Queen Tiye was the mother of both princes.
Akhenaten’s Great Queen Tiye has herself an interesting family background, which could have included Syrian ancestry just a few generations back, at a time when the Hittites were more and more encroaching on northern Syria and creating vassal kingdoms that owed their allegiance or suzerainty to the king of the Hittites, thus provoking trouble with imperial Egypt, which viewed Syria as its fiefdom. This Syrian/Asiatic link could theoretically have provided a Hittite ancestry for both Tuthmose and Akhenaten, as sons of Queen Tiye, but it is still stretching things to view them as Hittites rather than as Egyptians for the reality is, they were born in Egypt and raised as Egyptian princes.
Nevertheless, the hard fact remains that Thutmose’s tomb in the Valley of the Kings was found to be empty, with no evidence of the grave having ever been robbed, and no mummy for him has been found to this day. So, we must ask the question, was Tuthmose the person the C’s have said was Abraham/Moses/Paris and, if so, could he have also been the renegade priest Osaresph who led a revolt against pharaoh and took a gang of Semitic Habiru (Apiru), Hebrew or Shasu into the Sinai with him?
Graham Phillips in his book Act of God provides one final clue that may suggest that Prince Tuthmose was not Amenhotep III’s real son. Phillips points out that the last we hear of Tuthmose, was when he officiated in his capacity as the High Priest at the Temple of Ptah with his father Amenhotep III at the burial of the sacred Apis Bull. Apart from an ivory whip found in Tutankhamun’s tomb, which apparently Tuthmose used as commander of the King’s chariot forces, nothing more is heard of him. Thus, it is difficult to tell how much earlier than Akhenaten’s reign Tuthmose disappears, as only one reference to Akhenaten survives from the period before he became pharaoh. This reference is to the wine-jar seal found among the ruins of Malkata Palace, which refers to “the estate of the true king’s son Amenhotep”. For Phillips, it is intriguing that Akhenaten under his original name of Amenhotep is described here as the true king’s son, as this implies that someone else was not. Could this have been a deliberate slight against Tuthmose? When you take this written evidence and the fact that Tuthmose rock-cut tomb was suddenly abandoned, it does suggest that like the Biblical Moses, Tuthmose had somehow fallen from royal favour (assuming here that he had not died, as most mainstream Egyptologists believe). If Moses had really been brought up a royal prince in Egypt during the reign of Amenhotep III, then for Phillips, Thutmose is the only known historical figure who fits the profile.
In the transcripts, the C’s confirmed that when Abraham/Moses led the Israelites or Hebrews into the Sinai Desert, they became Bedouin nomads.
Session 23 August 2001:
Q: (L) So, from 1627 BC to 1588 BC - that's 39 years - almost exactly 40 years of "wandering in the desert," so to say. So they must have escaped when Thera blew and forty years later, the comets came. What was Abraham and his crew doing during that time?
A: Bedouins.
Q: (L) How many were in this tribe?
A: 623.
Q: (L) So it wasn't multiple thousands of people as the Bible would have us believe.
Is there anything in history to support this statement? Yes, there is and it relates to a group of Middle Eastern people known to history as the Shasu.
According to Wikipedia, the earliest known reference to the Shasu occurs in a 15th-century B.C. list of peoples in the Transjordan region. As previously mentioned above, the name appears in a list of Egypt's enemies inscribed on column bases at the temple of Soleb built by Amenhotep III, Akhenaten’s father. This clearly shows that they were contemporaries of Akhenaten and Abraham/Moses. Among the details uncovered at the temple was a reference to a place called "Seir, in the land of Shasu" (ta-Shasu se`er, t3-sh3sw s`r), a name thought to be related to or near to Petra in Jordan, which was a territory occupied by the Biblical Edomites at that time.
According to Wikipedia, the earliest known reference to the Shasu occurs in a 15th-century B.C. list of peoples in the Transjordan region. As previously mentioned above, the name appears in a list of Egypt's enemies inscribed on column bases at the temple of Soleb built by Amenhotep III, Akhenaten’s father. This clearly shows that they were contemporaries of Akhenaten and Abraham/Moses. Among the details uncovered at the temple was a reference to a place called "Seir, in the land of Shasu" (ta-Shasu se`er, t3-sh3sw s`r), a name thought to be related to or near to Petra in Jordan, which was a territory occupied by the Biblical Edomites at that time.
Quoting also from a book called Tutankhamun the Exodus Conspiracy by Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald:
“For example, [the fortress of Per-Atum (Pr-Itm)] features in a dispatch made by an Egyptian official of the region during the reign of [Pharaoh] Merneptah:
…. This is a dispatch for [my master’s] information … to wit, we have finished admitting the Shasu-tribes of Edom (through) the fortress of Merneptah-hotpe-hi-ma’at which is (in) Tjekku to the water holes of [Pr-Itm] the house of Atum-of- Merneptah which are in Tjekku, for their own subsistence and that of their flocks.
Here in the so called Merneptah Stela we gain a glimpse of the manner in which ‘Shasu tribes’ – the name given to pastoral nomads, or ancient Bedouin – were able in times of hardship to enter Egyptian territory in order to graze their herds on its more fertile pastures. For this privilege they would come all the way from Edom, a mountainous region north of the Gulf of Aqaba and east of the Dead Sea, in the Transjordan.”
Hence, we see above an Egyptian reference to the Shasu, a Semitic speaking people, linking them with the ancient Bedouin tribes who were coming up from the land of Edom to graze their herds in Egypt. This suggests that some of these Bedouin tribesman must have been Edomites. The Edomites were supposedly the descendants of Esau (or Edom, a name meaning “red”) who according to the Bible was the elder son of the Hebrew patriarch Isaac (Abraham’s son), who as a young adult sold his birth right to his twin brother Jacob for a portion of "red pottage" [MJF: According to the C’s, Jacob was just another persona of Abraham/Moses and this story of a brother relationship was simply created to legitimise a false line of transmission]. The Hebrew Bible in Genesis 36:31-43 lists the kings of Edom "before any Israelite king reigned". King David was meant to be the third king of a United Kingdom of Israel, so this suggests that the Edomites were a tribal group ruled by a king long before the Israelites were. However, the Bible clearly indicates that the Israelites and Edomites were related peoples since Moses and the Israelite people twice appealed to their common ancestry when asking the king of Edom for safe passage through his land, along the "King's Highway", on their way to Canaan, but the king refused permission. Accordingly, the Israelites detoured around the country because of his show of force or because God ordered them to do so rather than wage war (Deuteronomy 2:4–6). If the Edomites were a Shasu tribe, this suggests that the Israelites or Hebrews, as their kinsmen, must have also been a Shasu tribal group originally prior to their assimilation into Egyptian society.
The Edomites' original country, according to the Hebrew Bible, stretched from the Sinai Peninsula as far as Kadesh Barnea on the southern border of Canaan (later Israel). It reached as far south as Eilat, which was the seaport of Edom. On the north of Edom was the territory of the Moabites. Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald tell us that in Hebrew Talmudic lore Kadesh or Kadesh Barnea, as it was also called, was known as Rekem-Giah. Which in the Hebrew Targum (or commentary) on the book of Deuteronomy is said to have been where the Israelites camped when in the wilderness. The authors claim that Rekem, also spelled Arke and Arce (MJF: does this suggest a link to the Ark of the Covenant?), is in fact Petra, a fact attested not only in ancient textual accounts of both Jewish and early Christian origin, but also in Nabatean inscriptions discovered in modern times at the entrance to the famous Siq in which Petra is located. They also tell us that Rekem-Giah or Rekem Gea actually translates as ‘of the ravine’, a reference which seems to be to the Siq itself. Although the Edomites had occupied this site long before the Nabateans arrived, it was the latter who built the extraordinary rock city of Petra in a Romano-Greek style.
Mount Seir and the Mountain of GodThe Edomites' original country, according to the Hebrew Bible, stretched from the Sinai Peninsula as far as Kadesh Barnea on the southern border of Canaan (later Israel). It reached as far south as Eilat, which was the seaport of Edom. On the north of Edom was the territory of the Moabites. Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald tell us that in Hebrew Talmudic lore Kadesh or Kadesh Barnea, as it was also called, was known as Rekem-Giah. Which in the Hebrew Targum (or commentary) on the book of Deuteronomy is said to have been where the Israelites camped when in the wilderness. The authors claim that Rekem, also spelled Arke and Arce (MJF: does this suggest a link to the Ark of the Covenant?), is in fact Petra, a fact attested not only in ancient textual accounts of both Jewish and early Christian origin, but also in Nabatean inscriptions discovered in modern times at the entrance to the famous Siq in which Petra is located. They also tell us that Rekem-Giah or Rekem Gea actually translates as ‘of the ravine’, a reference which seems to be to the Siq itself. Although the Edomites had occupied this site long before the Nabateans arrived, it was the latter who built the extraordinary rock city of Petra in a Romano-Greek style.
According to Genesis, Esau's descendants settled in the land after they had displaced a people called the Horites, a non-Semitic people who have been linked with the Hurrians. Edom was also called the land of Seir and Mount Seir, which appears to have been strongly identified with the Edomites and may have been an ancient cultic site. Mount Seir standing on the Edomite side of the border also marked the south-eastern border of Egyptian Canaan in the Late Bronze Age. In an earlier article on this thread, I described how Graham Phillips in his book The Templars and the Ark of the Covenant took the view that Mount Seir (today called Jebel Madhbah) was the real Mount Sinai where Moses met with God and received the Ten Commandments. Indeed, there is an ancient shrine, a large open-air temple, located at its summit, which includes a lower obelisk terrace measuring 20,000 square feet with two twenty-foot-high stone obelisks [MJF: where these the original pillars intended to represent Joachim and Boaz as supposedly used in the temple of Solomon and now in Masonic lodges and temples worldwide?] hewn out of solid rock.
The mountain may have been an Edomite sacred site associated with God prior to the time of Moses, as the Jewish historian Josephus avers. The important thing to note is that local Bedouin tribesmen even to this day link the mountain and other sacred sites in the vicinity to both God and Moses and the site of Jebel Madhbah happens also to be very close to Petra, a place that was occupied by the ancient Edomites. Could this oral tradition of the Bedouin have been passed down from generation to generation from the time of Abraham/Moses? It is interesting that Petra in Greek and Hebrew means rock, which may link with the local Bedouin tradition that Moses struck a rock somewhere in this area to produce a miraculous spring of drinking water. Curiously, although the rock city of Petra was built by the Nabateans rather than the Edomites, local Bedouin have always associated the famous treasury building with a treasure belonging to Pharaoh’s daughter, whilst other monuments in and around Petra are linked with the Pharaoh of the Exodus. Could this be an echo of the Israelite flight into the land of Seir (or of the Shasu) led by Abraham/Moses with Pharaoh Akhenaten’s forces in hot pursuit and, by extension, the role of Akhenaten’s daughter Meritaten/Hagar in this episode? Could the treasure she was supposed to have deposited there been the Ark of the Covenant in an echo of the legend of the prophet Jeremiah burying it there prior to the fall of Jerusalem, where it was subsequently found, so Graham Phillips believes, by the medieval Knights Templar at the site of the Treasury (as discussed in my earlier article)? Alternatively, could this treasure belonging to Pharaoh’s daughter have been the Holy Grail, which Meritaten/Hagar may have been the custodian or guardian of?
Graham Phillips is not the only author to link Jebel Madhbah and Petra with Moses and the Israelites, for Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald in their book Tutankhamun the Exodus Conspiracy also link Jebel Madhbah with Mount Seir, Mount Sinai and Mount Horeb, the Biblical Mountain of God where Moses entered into the blood covenant with God and his people. However, these authors make a number of telling points that link Yahweh, the God of the Israelites, to the ancient Moon God Sin (en-zu or zu-en – meaning ‘the lord of knowledge) of the Mesopotamians. Sin’s major temple was based at Ur, a major city located at the mouth of the Euphrates River. However, his other great temple was at Harran on the borders of what is today northern Syria and south-eastern Turkey, which at the time of Akhenaten and Abraham/Moses was Hittite territory (see map below). The authors point out that the most ancient worshippers of the moon god were not the farmers but the Aramean and proto-Aramean nomadic pastoralists, Semitic speaking peoples, who roamed the deserts of Syria and Arabia and were the forerunners of the Midianites and the pre-Islamic Arabs (including the Bedouin). In the Old Testament, the Arameans were descendants of Aram, the son of Shem and the great-uncle of Abraham, whose older brothers were named Nahor and Haran. Midian, the supposed ancestor of the Midianites, was meant to be the fourth son of Abraham by Keturah, his concubine.
Abraham was said to be born in ‘Ur of the Chaldees’ located in the Biblical land of Shinar, ancient Sumer. However, Collins and Ogilvie-Herald think in all likelihood, that the Biblical city of Ur is to be identified with Urfa (the City of Prophets), ancient Edessa in south-east Turkey. Interestingly, Urfa is not far from the site of Göbekli Tepe and through the recent discovery of the large ‘Urfa Man’ limestone statue, is linked with giants and the Nephilim. The two authors link Urfa with an ancient city named in Akkadian, Sumerian and Hittite texts as Ursu (MJF: which makes me wonder if it can be linked etymologically to “Ursa”, the Bear, as worshipped by the Franks and Merovingians, and represented by the constellation of Ursa Major, the Great Bear aka the Big Dipper and the Plough). More significantly, Ursu had its own temple to the moon god Sin, whilst the term “Chaldees” or “Chaldeans” was simply another name for the star worshippers of Harran (Harranians) and Urfa later known as the Sabians (see my earlier article which linked them to a strange group at Giza) or star gazers. Indeed, according to the Bible, Abraham would later move to Harran with his family and spend some time there before moving on to Canaan and eventually, because of famine conditions, to Egypt. Although worshippers of the stars and planets, the ancient inhabitants of Urfa and Harran particularly worshipped the moon, i.e., Sin whom they saw as ‘God of Gods’ or ‘Lord of Gods’. Indeed, Harran was actually referred to as the ‘city of Sin’. Given that the C’s have told us that the moon is occupied by the alien Greys, this makes one wonder if the Greys may have played a part in encouraging such moon worship in the same way they told us that Yahweh was in reality a front for the Lizard beings. However, this Chaldean or Sabian influence certainly bears out the reasons why Abraham and his fellow Levites (Trojans/Dardanians) were originally moon worshippers before switching to sun or Aten worship in Egypt:
The mountain may have been an Edomite sacred site associated with God prior to the time of Moses, as the Jewish historian Josephus avers. The important thing to note is that local Bedouin tribesmen even to this day link the mountain and other sacred sites in the vicinity to both God and Moses and the site of Jebel Madhbah happens also to be very close to Petra, a place that was occupied by the ancient Edomites. Could this oral tradition of the Bedouin have been passed down from generation to generation from the time of Abraham/Moses? It is interesting that Petra in Greek and Hebrew means rock, which may link with the local Bedouin tradition that Moses struck a rock somewhere in this area to produce a miraculous spring of drinking water. Curiously, although the rock city of Petra was built by the Nabateans rather than the Edomites, local Bedouin have always associated the famous treasury building with a treasure belonging to Pharaoh’s daughter, whilst other monuments in and around Petra are linked with the Pharaoh of the Exodus. Could this be an echo of the Israelite flight into the land of Seir (or of the Shasu) led by Abraham/Moses with Pharaoh Akhenaten’s forces in hot pursuit and, by extension, the role of Akhenaten’s daughter Meritaten/Hagar in this episode? Could the treasure she was supposed to have deposited there been the Ark of the Covenant in an echo of the legend of the prophet Jeremiah burying it there prior to the fall of Jerusalem, where it was subsequently found, so Graham Phillips believes, by the medieval Knights Templar at the site of the Treasury (as discussed in my earlier article)? Alternatively, could this treasure belonging to Pharaoh’s daughter have been the Holy Grail, which Meritaten/Hagar may have been the custodian or guardian of?
Graham Phillips is not the only author to link Jebel Madhbah and Petra with Moses and the Israelites, for Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald in their book Tutankhamun the Exodus Conspiracy also link Jebel Madhbah with Mount Seir, Mount Sinai and Mount Horeb, the Biblical Mountain of God where Moses entered into the blood covenant with God and his people. However, these authors make a number of telling points that link Yahweh, the God of the Israelites, to the ancient Moon God Sin (en-zu or zu-en – meaning ‘the lord of knowledge) of the Mesopotamians. Sin’s major temple was based at Ur, a major city located at the mouth of the Euphrates River. However, his other great temple was at Harran on the borders of what is today northern Syria and south-eastern Turkey, which at the time of Akhenaten and Abraham/Moses was Hittite territory (see map below). The authors point out that the most ancient worshippers of the moon god were not the farmers but the Aramean and proto-Aramean nomadic pastoralists, Semitic speaking peoples, who roamed the deserts of Syria and Arabia and were the forerunners of the Midianites and the pre-Islamic Arabs (including the Bedouin). In the Old Testament, the Arameans were descendants of Aram, the son of Shem and the great-uncle of Abraham, whose older brothers were named Nahor and Haran. Midian, the supposed ancestor of the Midianites, was meant to be the fourth son of Abraham by Keturah, his concubine.
Abraham was said to be born in ‘Ur of the Chaldees’ located in the Biblical land of Shinar, ancient Sumer. However, Collins and Ogilvie-Herald think in all likelihood, that the Biblical city of Ur is to be identified with Urfa (the City of Prophets), ancient Edessa in south-east Turkey. Interestingly, Urfa is not far from the site of Göbekli Tepe and through the recent discovery of the large ‘Urfa Man’ limestone statue, is linked with giants and the Nephilim. The two authors link Urfa with an ancient city named in Akkadian, Sumerian and Hittite texts as Ursu (MJF: which makes me wonder if it can be linked etymologically to “Ursa”, the Bear, as worshipped by the Franks and Merovingians, and represented by the constellation of Ursa Major, the Great Bear aka the Big Dipper and the Plough). More significantly, Ursu had its own temple to the moon god Sin, whilst the term “Chaldees” or “Chaldeans” was simply another name for the star worshippers of Harran (Harranians) and Urfa later known as the Sabians (see my earlier article which linked them to a strange group at Giza) or star gazers. Indeed, according to the Bible, Abraham would later move to Harran with his family and spend some time there before moving on to Canaan and eventually, because of famine conditions, to Egypt. Although worshippers of the stars and planets, the ancient inhabitants of Urfa and Harran particularly worshipped the moon, i.e., Sin whom they saw as ‘God of Gods’ or ‘Lord of Gods’. Indeed, Harran was actually referred to as the ‘city of Sin’. Given that the C’s have told us that the moon is occupied by the alien Greys, this makes one wonder if the Greys may have played a part in encouraging such moon worship in the same way they told us that Yahweh was in reality a front for the Lizard beings. However, this Chaldean or Sabian influence certainly bears out the reasons why Abraham and his fellow Levites (Trojans/Dardanians) were originally moon worshippers before switching to sun or Aten worship in Egypt:
Session 20 August 2001:
Q: All right, first question is, what is the origin of the Levites?
A: Hittites Moon Worshippers.
If the Levites were Trojan or Dardanian descendants, who through migration became Chaldean Hittites, this might establish a possible earlier link with the Druids of Stonehenge, who the C’s told us were also star worshippers:
Session 3 October 1998:
Q: Who was worshipped by the people who built Stonehenge?
A: Complicated.
Q: Give me some key words to work it out.
A: Spirits, stars, energy.
The authors note that the fact that Abraham, the first great patriarch of the Jews, was brought up in ‘Ur of the Chaldees’ and spent much of his early life at Harran, both great cult centres of the moon god Sin, has long intrigued Biblical scholars. The possibility of there being a link between Yahweh and the moon god Sin is a very tantalising prospect indeed, especially when one considers the fact that the Mountain of God (Mountain of Yahweh), on which Abraham/Moses received the Ten Commandments is named ‘Sinai’ in the Bible, which means quite literally ‘of Sin’ or ‘of the Moon’.
Collins and Ogilvie-Herald also allude to the myths and legends of the Mandeans, a people who originated in Harran but over the last 1,500 years have spread across Lower Iran and Iraq, although still leading semi-nomadic lifestyles. Today their descendants are the Marsh Arabs. According to Mandean tradition, Bahram [MJF: which again reminds me of the Indian deity Brahma], their name for Abraham, was originally a Mandean from Harran. Yet when he was circumcised, which made him unclean, he began worshipping Yurba, a sun spirit [MJF: the Aten or Ra?] identified with the Hebrew Adonai [a substitute for the name of Yahweh], who was commanded by Ruha, queen of darkness [MJF: is this a reference to Nefertiti/Sarah perhaps?]. Henceforth he destroyed all the idols in the great temple and went forth into the desert and with him went all the unclean and ‘leprous and those who were deficient – and of these Basran Sira (moon-deficients) their descendants are unclean and deficient until the seventh generation’. Bahram’s tribe grew mightier and mightier, and Yurba gave them great power in the world, as well as magic power that fire was unable to burn him [MJF: which may be a reference to the power of the Ark of the Covenant]. He took his place on the side of darkness, and fought against the Mandeans, whom he would catch and circumcise with force and make them unclean like himself.
The two authors note that parts of the above account are eerily similar to aspects of the Exodus narrative offered by Manetho and other ancient writers. It was also significant for them that Abraham’s followers were known as Basran Sira, ‘moon-deficients’, with Sira, or Sera, being the Mandaean name for the moon. This implies that these people were renegade moon worshippers, since the moon was seen by the Mandeans as an ‘unclean’ sinister influence that was described as ‘overthrower’, ‘striker’ and the ‘bringer about of deficiency’. However, they also note that the Mandean name for the moon, Sira or Sera, is phonetically so similar to Seir, the local god who gave his name to the valley and mountain range north of the Gulf of Aqaba, that this cannot be mere coincidence. This supposition is reinforced by the knowledge that both the Mountain of God (Mountain of Yahweh) and the wilderness in which the Israelites wandered bore names that reflect the moon god Sin, since Sinai, as mentioned above, means simply ‘of Sin’, making Mount Seir, like Mount Sinai, the ‘Mountain of the Moon’.
The Moon God Yahweh Collins and Ogilvie-Herald also allude to the myths and legends of the Mandeans, a people who originated in Harran but over the last 1,500 years have spread across Lower Iran and Iraq, although still leading semi-nomadic lifestyles. Today their descendants are the Marsh Arabs. According to Mandean tradition, Bahram [MJF: which again reminds me of the Indian deity Brahma], their name for Abraham, was originally a Mandean from Harran. Yet when he was circumcised, which made him unclean, he began worshipping Yurba, a sun spirit [MJF: the Aten or Ra?] identified with the Hebrew Adonai [a substitute for the name of Yahweh], who was commanded by Ruha, queen of darkness [MJF: is this a reference to Nefertiti/Sarah perhaps?]. Henceforth he destroyed all the idols in the great temple and went forth into the desert and with him went all the unclean and ‘leprous and those who were deficient – and of these Basran Sira (moon-deficients) their descendants are unclean and deficient until the seventh generation’. Bahram’s tribe grew mightier and mightier, and Yurba gave them great power in the world, as well as magic power that fire was unable to burn him [MJF: which may be a reference to the power of the Ark of the Covenant]. He took his place on the side of darkness, and fought against the Mandeans, whom he would catch and circumcise with force and make them unclean like himself.
The two authors note that parts of the above account are eerily similar to aspects of the Exodus narrative offered by Manetho and other ancient writers. It was also significant for them that Abraham’s followers were known as Basran Sira, ‘moon-deficients’, with Sira, or Sera, being the Mandaean name for the moon. This implies that these people were renegade moon worshippers, since the moon was seen by the Mandeans as an ‘unclean’ sinister influence that was described as ‘overthrower’, ‘striker’ and the ‘bringer about of deficiency’. However, they also note that the Mandean name for the moon, Sira or Sera, is phonetically so similar to Seir, the local god who gave his name to the valley and mountain range north of the Gulf of Aqaba, that this cannot be mere coincidence. This supposition is reinforced by the knowledge that both the Mountain of God (Mountain of Yahweh) and the wilderness in which the Israelites wandered bore names that reflect the moon god Sin, since Sinai, as mentioned above, means simply ‘of Sin’, making Mount Seir, like Mount Sinai, the ‘Mountain of the Moon’.
Although I will deal below with the evident similarities that can be seen between the religious beliefs and practices of the Egyptian Atenists (led by Pharaoh Akhenaten) and the early Israelites, we should first note how the religion of the Israelites and their Shusa cousins was clearly rooted in moon worship and their god Yahweh, who would appear to have been the moon god Sin by another name.
As Collins and Ogilvie-Herald note, the worship of Yahweh among the Israelites was influenced by the veneration of the moon. Although the lunar deity was important to many ancient cultures in the Middle East (think of the Egyptian Moon goddesses Hathor and Isis for example), it was especially revered among Semitic-speaking nomadic pastoralists. Although the sun played a major role in agricultural cycles, to those who led a nomadic lifestyle, the moon was far more important since herds and flocks were moved by night to avoid the searing heat of the day. From the earliest times these Arab peoples (like the Bedouin and the Shasu) celebrated festivals at the time of the new moon. We also find the Hebrews, who were originally nomadic pastoralists, conducted all their major feasts in accordance with the lunar calendar including the Passover, which in spite of Exodus seems to have evolved from a much more archaic Semitic religious custom that was adhered to by the pre-Mosaic Hebrews (which probably was originally an act of appeasement to the lunar deity through the sacrificial offering of young or new-born animals). The Passover or Pesah feast was a night celebration, which begins at sunset and culminates at dawn being conducted in the presence of the deity (Yahweh), who could only have been identified with the full moon. Curiously, ‘the face of Yahweh’ and the ‘glory of Yahweh’ are old designations for the full moon, which appears on the 15th day of the month as a visible sign of the presence of the deity. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald cite other examples of how as late as the time of the Exodus, the religious practices of the Hebrews contained elements of lunar worship, which seem to have mirrored those conducted in the name of the moon god Sin by the pre-Islamic Arabs (including the Bedouin), the Semitic cousins of the Israelites.
As Collins and Ogilvie-Herald note, the worship of Yahweh among the Israelites was influenced by the veneration of the moon. Although the lunar deity was important to many ancient cultures in the Middle East (think of the Egyptian Moon goddesses Hathor and Isis for example), it was especially revered among Semitic-speaking nomadic pastoralists. Although the sun played a major role in agricultural cycles, to those who led a nomadic lifestyle, the moon was far more important since herds and flocks were moved by night to avoid the searing heat of the day. From the earliest times these Arab peoples (like the Bedouin and the Shasu) celebrated festivals at the time of the new moon. We also find the Hebrews, who were originally nomadic pastoralists, conducted all their major feasts in accordance with the lunar calendar including the Passover, which in spite of Exodus seems to have evolved from a much more archaic Semitic religious custom that was adhered to by the pre-Mosaic Hebrews (which probably was originally an act of appeasement to the lunar deity through the sacrificial offering of young or new-born animals). The Passover or Pesah feast was a night celebration, which begins at sunset and culminates at dawn being conducted in the presence of the deity (Yahweh), who could only have been identified with the full moon. Curiously, ‘the face of Yahweh’ and the ‘glory of Yahweh’ are old designations for the full moon, which appears on the 15th day of the month as a visible sign of the presence of the deity. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald cite other examples of how as late as the time of the Exodus, the religious practices of the Hebrews contained elements of lunar worship, which seem to have mirrored those conducted in the name of the moon god Sin by the pre-Islamic Arabs (including the Bedouin), the Semitic cousins of the Israelites.
King David and the Levites
Continuing with the session dated 23 August 2001:
Q: (L) When did this tribe finally arrive in Israel and settle down. Was this after 40 years living as Bedouins?
A: Pretty much.
Q: (L) Well, I still have to deal with this King David issue. He was like a Robin Hood. Now, in another direction, what's this deal about Abraham talking to God. Is this where the whole monotheism came in?
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, it started out with Abraham and his tribe. Did he have reinforcements of his Levite brothers who came and joined his tribe from Hittite land?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Are there any details of this story that I haven't covered that I ought to?
A: David was a Levite.
Q: (L) Was he of the line of Abraham?
A: No.
Q: (L) Did he come from "Hittite land?"
A: Close.
Q: (L) How many generations before he was born did his family come to the area of Palestine?
A: 5.
Q: (L) Were they relatives of Abraham?
A: Somewhat.
Q: (L) Distantly related. So, what did David do? Came along and gathered the people together?
A: Yes.
When Laura speaks of “Hittite Land”, she probably meant what we think of today as Anatolia or Turkey. You will note that the C’s say she is close. Below is a map of the Hittite kingdom at its greatest extent between 1350-1300 BC.
However, as you can see above, the Hittite kingdom extended down into modern Syria and Lebanon, just to the north of what was then Egyptian Canaan (and today Israel). Hence, it is quite conceivable that groups of Hittites had migrated into Canaan to become Canaanites and into Edom to become Edomites by the time of Abraham/Moses. You will also note that five generations can cover anywhere between 150-200 years plus. Moreover, one should be aware that from the late 12th century BC, during the Late Bronze Age collapse, the Hittites splintered into several independent Syro-Hittite states, which may have coincided with the reign of King David.
In this last regard it is important to keep in mind that Biblical scholars have noted that Judah and the Hittites were never enemies in the Hebrew texts; in the Book of Kings, they supplied the Israelites with cedar, chariots, and horses, and in the Book of Genesis they were friends and allies to Abraham. Uriah the Hittite was a captain in King David's army and counted as one of his "mighty men" in 1 Chronicles: 11. This may suggest that the Israelites were kinsmen of the Hittites, if not Hittites themselves.
But who exactly were the Levites that King David was one of? In the Biblical story of Exodus they are priests and the guardians and carriers of the Ark of the Covenant. The C’s described them as a sect of monks, which suggests some kind of a priestly brotherhood, who had formerly been Hittite moon worshippers and were closely connected to Moses:
In this last regard it is important to keep in mind that Biblical scholars have noted that Judah and the Hittites were never enemies in the Hebrew texts; in the Book of Kings, they supplied the Israelites with cedar, chariots, and horses, and in the Book of Genesis they were friends and allies to Abraham. Uriah the Hittite was a captain in King David's army and counted as one of his "mighty men" in 1 Chronicles: 11. This may suggest that the Israelites were kinsmen of the Hittites, if not Hittites themselves.
But who exactly were the Levites that King David was one of? In the Biblical story of Exodus they are priests and the guardians and carriers of the Ark of the Covenant. The C’s described them as a sect of monks, which suggests some kind of a priestly brotherhood, who had formerly been Hittite moon worshippers and were closely connected to Moses:
Session 13 November 1999:
Q: Who were the Levites?
A: Sect of monk-like pacifists. Connected to Moses.
Q: Well, that doesn't make a lot of sense. They sure did a lot of warmongering and they were behind all the rules and regulations that the Jews followed and that was behind the orders to massacre entire races of. That doesn't seem to make sense at all!
A: Oh yes it does. Pacifists can be managers, not slaves.
From the above, we see that the Levites were pacifists who acted as managers. This description reminds me of the Celtic Druid priests, who similarly did not participate directly in fighting but were key advisors to the Celtic kings and chieftains and were also judges, teachers and administrators (managers). If the Hittites were truly the descendants of Trojan or Dardanian Celts, this would make a lot of sense and it may suggest that the Levite priesthood had derived from the Druid priests who may have set up shop in Harran, after Troy’s fall, becoming the Chaldeans or Sabian star worshippers.
Moses the Egyptian Levite
Given Josephus’s and Manetho’s description of Osarseph, the Egyptian renegade priest who was meant to have been a servitor at the temple of Ra (N.B. a sun god rather than a moon god) in Heliopolis before he abandoned the Egyptian gods, this makes me wonder if the Levites may have been a group of fellow priests of Hittite stock who allied themselves, as undesirables, to Moses and pursued the worship of the Aten, who they subsequently associated with Yahweh after Moses had been misled by the Lizard beings. Recall here that Manetho said that the Pharaoh Amenophis (Amenhotep III and/or his son Akhenaten) was advised to purge the country of these “undesirables” and to set them to work in the stone quarries of Avaris (to the Hebrews the city of On). For many years these people were forced to work as slaves until they were joined by a priest from the temple of Ra in Heliopolis who then trained them as an army and led them in a revolt. However, the C’s seem to be emphasising in the extract quoted above that the Levites were never slaves, which suggests that the Levites may already have been a priestly caste and as such were exempt from servile work in the stone quarries. Manetho may provide some justification for this view where he states:
“Amenophis [probably Akhenaten here], the wise man and the prophet, was afraid that the gods would be angry at him and at the king, if there should appear to have been violence offered them [i.e., ‘the wise priests’].
Knowing full well the consequences of his words, he predicted that ‘certain people would come to the assistance of these polluted wretches’, who would rise up, depose the king and remain in charge of the kingdom for thirteen years.
This last reference to a thirteen-year period almost certainly seems to allude to the Amarna heresy period. Does this indicate that the monotheistic cult of the Aten commenced in the former Hyksos capitol of Avaris with these Levite priests and spread from there? The references to lepers and ‘impure people’ may not have meant lepers literally but may instead be a metaphor for Aten worshipping heretics (although there could have been genuine lepers among them too). As Collins and Ogilvie-Herald point out, having occupied the city, ‘the lepers’ and ‘impure people’ used Avaris as a base for revolt and elected themselves a leader ‘out of the priests of Heliopolis’. His name was Osarsiph (from Osiris the god of Heliopolis), or Osarseph, and to him the people swore an oath of obedience, and in return he made new laws that were mainly opposite to the customs of Egypt, which involved destroying the images of the former Egyptian gods and sacrificing the former sacred animals. The mention of an oath of obedience immediately reminds one of the blood covenant entered into by the Israelites on Mount Sinai and the creation of new laws seems to be a reflection of Moses’s Biblical role as the great lawmaker. To reinforce the connection between Osarseph and Moses Manetho adds “but that when he was gone over to these people, his name was changed and he was called Moses.”
So, did Abraham/Moses in his guise as Osarseph transform this Levite monastic priesthood or brotherhood from moon god worshippers to sun god worshippers, specifically to Ra first and then to the Aten, culminating in the eventual worship of Yəhōwā (one vocalization of the Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHWH)), known to modern western audiences today as Jehovah or Yahweh (who the C’s told us was a Lizard front), who appears to be the “Ho”, “Haho” or “Hawah” (the Irish pig god) the C’s are referring to in the excerpt from the transcripts shown below:
So, did Abraham/Moses in his guise as Osarseph transform this Levite monastic priesthood or brotherhood from moon god worshippers to sun god worshippers, specifically to Ra first and then to the Aten, culminating in the eventual worship of Yəhōwā (one vocalization of the Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHWH)), known to modern western audiences today as Jehovah or Yahweh (who the C’s told us was a Lizard front), who appears to be the “Ho”, “Haho” or “Hawah” (the Irish pig god) the C’s are referring to in the excerpt from the transcripts shown below:
Q: If the Levites were the Hittite Moon worshipers, how come Akhenaten, who hung out with Nefertiti, instituted Sun worship? That doesn't make sense.
A: Future Ho into.
Q: Future what into?
A: Ho.
Q: HO must stand for something. I don't understand. Was Nefertiti responsible for Akhenaten's Sun worship?
A: Mostly.
Q: Well why did it turn into Sun worship instead of Moon worship?
A: Future honour of Ra. Go 353535. Deity.
Q: So in other words they were laying a foundation for future layering of other concepts?
A: Yes.
Q: Was the Temple on Crete at Knossos, was it really a necropolis as Wunderlich suggests?
A: 5th density waiting room.
Q: Did they sacrifice humans there?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they sacrifice animals?
A: Yes.
Q: What animals were they sacrificing, and to whom?
A: Apis Bull in part.
Q: What was the other part?
A: Haho 353535
Q: "Ho" must be a name. Is Ho a name of a god?
A: HOH 353535
Q: (T) Is it water? (L) Is it like Hawah? (A) HOH water?
A: Remember Irish pig.
Evidently, the Lizards set things up this way as part of a long-term strategy that carries on even to this day. Although we tend to think of the Israelites as primarily sacrificing sheep to Yahweh, they did also sacrifice bulls like the Egyptians did with the Apis Bull.
Quoting from Wikipedia on this last point:
Aten was considered to have been everywhere and intangible as Aten was the sunlight and energy in the world. Therefore, he did not have physical representations that other traditional ancient Egyptian gods had but was instead represented via the sun disc and reaching rays of light. The explanation as to why the Aten could not be fully represented was that the Aten was beyond creation. Thus, the inscriptions of scenes of gods carved in stone, which previously depicted animals and human forms instead showed the Aten as an orb above with life-giving rays stretching toward the royal figure. This power transcended human or animal form.
The Aten’s other titles and forms of address were in fact identical to those used for the Hebrew god (see below).
Another unlikely source for linking Moses to Akhenaten in the Amarna age and the Atenist and Israelite religions together was the famous psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud who in two major articles and a book called Moses and Monotheism published in 1940 proposed that Moses had been an Egyptian at the court of Akhenaten. He put forward some stimulating evidence to back up his thesis, including the fact that the Hebrew word for ‘the Lord’, as we saw above, was Adonai or Adon which becomes Aten, the name of Akhenaten’s sun disk, when written in Egyptian.
In the first years of his reign, Akhenaten erected a temple to the Aten at Karnak in Thebes. This temple was torn down shortly after the end of his reign when the Egyptians abandoned Atenism and reverted back to their traditional pantheon of gods. However, many of the sculptured blocks that decorated Akhenaten’s temple were preserved as fill inside two giant gate towers that stood in front of the nearby temple of the god Amun. When these towers were dismantled for structural repair in the 1930’s, over 40,000 of these sculptured blocks were discovered. Known as the Karnak talatat, many of these blocks are inscribed with Atenists prayers that bear more than a striking resemblance to Hebrew texts.
In these talatat inscriptions we find the Aten addressed in an almost identical fashion to Yahweh. Indeed, one reference is highly reminiscent of the “I am who am” episode involving Moses at Mount Sinai: “Thou art what thou art, radiant and high over every land”.
Other inscriptions refer to the Aten just as the Bible repeatedly refers to God, as “God Almighty” and “God most High”. For example: “O great Aten, god almighty, who furnishes man’s sustenance” and “O great Aten, god most high, who drivest away the dark”. The Aten is even referred to as the lord of armies, just as the Israelite god is called the Lord of Hosts: “Thou who art Lord over all the armies of the world”. Most frequently, however, the Aten is addressed in a similar fashion to the way in which the Hebrew God is addressed as Adonai, using the word Neb, the Egyptian word for “Lord”.
However, as Phillips and other observers have noticed, it was not only the forms of address to the deities that were alike but also the way in which the two religions perceived their deities, especially in the form of prayers. American Egyptologist James Henry Breasted was the first person in 1909 to notice that a lengthy prayer that had survived in a number of inscriptions in Akhenaten’s ruined capitol of Amarna, which is known today as “The Hymn to the Aten”, bore a striking similarity to Psalm 104 in the Old Testament. Both these prayers describe in almost identical terms how God and the Aten are seen respectively as creators, nurturers, and prime movers of all phenomena on earth. Breasted formed the view that Psalm 104 had been inspired by the Hymn and this led him to view Akhenaten as the first monotheist and scientist in history. The English Egyptologist and journalist Arthur Weigall compared the two texts side by side and commented that "In face of this remarkable similarity one can hardly doubt that there is a direct connection between the two compositions; and it becomes necessary to ask whether both Akhenaten's hymn and this Hebrew psalm were derived from a common Syrian source, or whether Psalm 105. is derived from this Pharaoh's original poem. Both views are admissible.” Other Egyptologists and Biblical scholars disagree on an Egyptian influence or view the similarities between Egyptian hymns and Biblical psalms as merely generic. However, there are still modern Egyptologists who argue for an Egyptian influence on Psalm 104. For those who want to compare the two texts side by side for themselves, I attach links to both prayers here:
In the first years of his reign, Akhenaten erected a temple to the Aten at Karnak in Thebes. This temple was torn down shortly after the end of his reign when the Egyptians abandoned Atenism and reverted back to their traditional pantheon of gods. However, many of the sculptured blocks that decorated Akhenaten’s temple were preserved as fill inside two giant gate towers that stood in front of the nearby temple of the god Amun. When these towers were dismantled for structural repair in the 1930’s, over 40,000 of these sculptured blocks were discovered. Known as the Karnak talatat, many of these blocks are inscribed with Atenists prayers that bear more than a striking resemblance to Hebrew texts.
In these talatat inscriptions we find the Aten addressed in an almost identical fashion to Yahweh. Indeed, one reference is highly reminiscent of the “I am who am” episode involving Moses at Mount Sinai: “Thou art what thou art, radiant and high over every land”.
Other inscriptions refer to the Aten just as the Bible repeatedly refers to God, as “God Almighty” and “God most High”. For example: “O great Aten, god almighty, who furnishes man’s sustenance” and “O great Aten, god most high, who drivest away the dark”. The Aten is even referred to as the lord of armies, just as the Israelite god is called the Lord of Hosts: “Thou who art Lord over all the armies of the world”. Most frequently, however, the Aten is addressed in a similar fashion to the way in which the Hebrew God is addressed as Adonai, using the word Neb, the Egyptian word for “Lord”.
However, as Phillips and other observers have noticed, it was not only the forms of address to the deities that were alike but also the way in which the two religions perceived their deities, especially in the form of prayers. American Egyptologist James Henry Breasted was the first person in 1909 to notice that a lengthy prayer that had survived in a number of inscriptions in Akhenaten’s ruined capitol of Amarna, which is known today as “The Hymn to the Aten”, bore a striking similarity to Psalm 104 in the Old Testament. Both these prayers describe in almost identical terms how God and the Aten are seen respectively as creators, nurturers, and prime movers of all phenomena on earth. Breasted formed the view that Psalm 104 had been inspired by the Hymn and this led him to view Akhenaten as the first monotheist and scientist in history. The English Egyptologist and journalist Arthur Weigall compared the two texts side by side and commented that "In face of this remarkable similarity one can hardly doubt that there is a direct connection between the two compositions; and it becomes necessary to ask whether both Akhenaten's hymn and this Hebrew psalm were derived from a common Syrian source, or whether Psalm 105. is derived from this Pharaoh's original poem. Both views are admissible.” Other Egyptologists and Biblical scholars disagree on an Egyptian influence or view the similarities between Egyptian hymns and Biblical psalms as merely generic. However, there are still modern Egyptologists who argue for an Egyptian influence on Psalm 104. For those who want to compare the two texts side by side for themselves, I attach links to both prayers here:
Great Hymn to the Aten - Wikipedia
Psalm 104 - Wikipedia
For Phillips another unique correlation between the God of Israel and the Aten is that neither deity was permitted to be represented by images. Although the early Israelites did make icons to represent aspects of God’s power, the Israelite religion prohibited the making of effigies of God himself. However, in Egypt, before Atenism, an effigy or statue of a god was traditionally an essential part of the cultic practice. Indeed, the Egyptians believed that the deities actually inhabited such images. Yet in all of ancient Egyptian history, only Atenism diverged from this practice with the Atenists forbidding the making of any idols and effigies of the Aten – the sole exception being the sacred Mnevis Bull (usually depicted as a black bull wearing a solar disk and uraeus). In this last regard, it should be noted that the early Israelites also continued to venerate a sacred bull much to the annoyance of Moses, as illustrated by the infamous episode of the worship of the Golden Calf. This practice of bull veneration seemed to continue at least to the time of the prophet Jeremiah and the fall of Jerusalem in 597 B.C. when the Babylonian forces who looted the Temple made off with “twelve brazen bulls” (bronze statues) that had stood at the base of the Temple pillars. Moreover, a few hand-sized bull effigies have been found at early Israelite sites throughout Israel and Palestine, which provide further evidence for the continuation of bull veneration among the Israelites.
It should be mentioned here that both religions got around this prohibition against images of their deity by employing symbols to represent the deity’s presence. In the Israelites’ case thy used a holy seven-branched candelabrum called the menorah to represent God’s light and presence in the temple. The Atenists used instead a symbol of light to represent the Aten, a glyph* in the form of a disc with arms extending downward to end in hands holding the Ankh, the Egyptian symbol of life (see illustration above and earlier comments). It thus depicted the sun with its rays bringing life-giving sunlight to the earth. However, it is important to note here that the glyph represented sunlight and not the sun itself, since sunshine, which brings warmth, light and life (photosynthesis etc.), yet cannot be seen in its own right, conveyed the idea of an invisible, omnipresent, all-providing god.
It should be mentioned here that both religions got around this prohibition against images of their deity by employing symbols to represent the deity’s presence. In the Israelites’ case thy used a holy seven-branched candelabrum called the menorah to represent God’s light and presence in the temple. The Atenists used instead a symbol of light to represent the Aten, a glyph* in the form of a disc with arms extending downward to end in hands holding the Ankh, the Egyptian symbol of life (see illustration above and earlier comments). It thus depicted the sun with its rays bringing life-giving sunlight to the earth. However, it is important to note here that the glyph represented sunlight and not the sun itself, since sunshine, which brings warmth, light and life (photosynthesis etc.), yet cannot be seen in its own right, conveyed the idea of an invisible, omnipresent, all-providing god.
*Eventually even the sun disc depictions of Aten were prohibited in an edict issued by Akhenaten
The Tomb of Aper-el
Phillips final piece of evidence that Atenism and the religion of the early Israelites were clearly related is for him the most compelling. In 1989 a French archaeologist named Alan Zivie made an astonishing discovery of a rock-cut tomb at Sakkara near Cairo. What is so astonishing is that the tomb was that of a priest of both the Aten and the Hebrew God. Inscriptions reveal that the man had been an important Egyptian official at the court of Akhenaten. In fact, it turned out that this man called Aper-el was one of the most important figures in Akhenaten’s government. He was a Grand Vizier, the chief minister of northern Egypt. DNA tests revealed though that he was not a native Egyptian but a Semite, which in itself may have been unusual enough (MJF: recall here though the Asiatic vizier Tutu referred to earlier in this article, who also had a rock-cut tomb made for him at Amarna). For Phillips what was more remarkable is that this man seemed to have been an Israelite. The name Aper-el appeared to Zivie to have been a title, which when translated means literally “Servitor of [the God] El”. As we saw above, El was the Hebrew word for God. His name clearly implied that Aper-el was a chief practitioner of the Israelite religion during Akhenaten’s reign. However, the tomb illustrations revealed that Aper-el was also the high priest of the Atenist temple in the city of Memphis. As Phillips states: “here we not only have evidence of a shared link between the Hebrew religion and Atenism but also an example of someone who seems to have been a priest of both religions and saw no contradiction”.
Phillips draws the logical conclusion from all this that the monotheistic religions of the Israelites and the Atenists must have been very closely related. Phillips adds that whether Atenism sprang from the religion of the Israelites, or the other way around may never be known. If though Nefertiti/Sarah was mainly responsible for Akhenaten’s sun (Aten) worship, as the C’s have claimed, then we must conclude that it was the Hittite/Israelite/Levite faction among the priests of Egypt who were ultimately responsible for promoting Atenism.
Last edited:
Postscript to Abraham, Moses, Akhenaten, Meritaten and the Cassiopaeans
The Missing Papyri of Tutankhamun
“Realising the potentialities of such a threat, when Great Britain was having such trouble on account of the Balfour promises to both the Jews and the Arabs, the Vice Royal lost his temper completely and let fly at Carter’s head an ink well that stood on his desk that was half full of ink … Eventually cooler heads prevailed and an adjustment was made so that Carter was silenced and the threat never materialised. "
Perhaps we will never know the answer, but then I suppose we could always ask the Cassiopaeans. Any volunteers?
The Missing Papyri of Tutankhamun
Although I said earlier that there is little written evidence surviving for the Amarna Period providing a record of what happened during that most extraordinary era in Egyptian history, there is a tantalising clue that an official record may have been preserved and found by the Egyptologist Howard Carter when he first opened Tutankhamun’s tomb in November 1922. According to claims made to the press by Lord Carnarvon, the financial sponsor of the expedition, shortly before his mysterious death in April 1923, Carter had found some papyri inside the tomb, which may have contained a record of the boy king’s reign, as was Egyptian custom at the time in relation to royal burials. If true, then why have these papyri never been released to the public, as they would no doubt have shed light on what transpired during the Amarna Period and perhaps also on the event which the Hebrew Bible calls the Exodus? The answer is complicated and linked with the highly involved and delicate politics of the Middle East during the early part of the 20th Century.
The allied victory in the First World War had seen the collapse of the Turkish empire in 1918. Turkey’s former territories in Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Mesopotamia were now occupied by the British and French. The victorious allies, through the newly formed League of Nations, subsequently granted the British a mandate to administer the former Turkish colony of Palestine. However, this mandate brought with it major political headaches for the British. A month before British Empire forces had captured Jerusalem from the Turks, the British government had signed the Balfour Declaration in November 1917 committing Britain to supporting the Zionist vision of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine, thus ending a Jewish exile from the Holy Land that had lasted for over 1,800 years. Many in the Arab world though did not share the Zionists' joy over the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, particularly when large numbers of Jewish people (especially from Russia) started to arrive and settle in the country after 1918. Arabs in the Middle East harboured concerns for their cousins in Palestine, as the Jewish population steadily grew in numbers and influence. In this last regard, Egyptian nationalism was openly pro-Arab, which created major issues for British diplomats working in Egypt. Indeed, Egypt itself was a tinderbox just waiting to explode. There had already been serious anti-Jewish riots in Jaffa in 1922, which might soon be repeated in Egypt. To complicate things further, the Arab revolt against Turkish occupation had proven extremely beneficial to the British in defeating the Turks, so there was also something of a debt of honour on the part of the British as regards trying to meet the aspirations of Arab nationalists. It was against this political backdrop that Howard Carter discovered the long-lost tomb of Tutankhamun in the Valley of the Kings.
The tomb’s discovery was a great coup for Carter and Lord Carnarvon and was major world-wide news, establishing them as heroes in the eyes of the public and putting Egypt very much in the limelight. However, Carter had long been in dispute with Egypt’s Antiquities Service and its ruling body the Ministry of Public Works, which reached its climax in the winter digging season of 1923-24. This led Carter’s archaeological team to down tools and go on strike. Unfortunately, this resulted in the Egyptian authorities retaliating by withdrawing Lady Carnarvon’s (who had taken over the financial backing of the project from her late husband) concession to dig in the Valley, leaving Carter out of work and in despair.
Carter was perplexed by the British government’s refusal to put pressure on the Egyptian government to reissue the concession and allow him back into the tomb. Carter eventually decided to take matters into his own hands and stormed into offices of the British High Consul in Cairo where he threatened that ‘unless he received complete satisfaction and justice, he would publish for the whole world to read the documents that he found in the tomb giving the true account according to the Egyptian Government of the exodus of the Jews from Egypt’. Although many have since argued that it was all a bluff on Carter’s part and that such documents never existed, Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald in their book Tutankhamun the Exodus Conspiracy argue that this was no idle threat. Carter would seem to believe that he possessed highly controversial information regarding the Biblical story of the Exodus, which if revealed would not only call into question the rudiments of the biblical story that was crucial to the foundation of ancient Israel but would also undermine the Zionist case for the establishment of a modern Jewish state on the same soil and with it the British Mandate for Palestine. Carter’s high standing and profile with the world media at that moment in time would have enabled him to deliver his findings to the widest possible audience. The results would not doubt have been like an explosive bombshell going off and the ensuing political crisis may have fatally undermined Zionist claims over Palestine, which had effectively been underwritten by the Balfour Agreement. It should be noted that the incident was recorded by an eyewitness, a gentleman called Lee Keedick, who produced a typewritten account of the meeting in Cairo:
The allied victory in the First World War had seen the collapse of the Turkish empire in 1918. Turkey’s former territories in Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Mesopotamia were now occupied by the British and French. The victorious allies, through the newly formed League of Nations, subsequently granted the British a mandate to administer the former Turkish colony of Palestine. However, this mandate brought with it major political headaches for the British. A month before British Empire forces had captured Jerusalem from the Turks, the British government had signed the Balfour Declaration in November 1917 committing Britain to supporting the Zionist vision of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine, thus ending a Jewish exile from the Holy Land that had lasted for over 1,800 years. Many in the Arab world though did not share the Zionists' joy over the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, particularly when large numbers of Jewish people (especially from Russia) started to arrive and settle in the country after 1918. Arabs in the Middle East harboured concerns for their cousins in Palestine, as the Jewish population steadily grew in numbers and influence. In this last regard, Egyptian nationalism was openly pro-Arab, which created major issues for British diplomats working in Egypt. Indeed, Egypt itself was a tinderbox just waiting to explode. There had already been serious anti-Jewish riots in Jaffa in 1922, which might soon be repeated in Egypt. To complicate things further, the Arab revolt against Turkish occupation had proven extremely beneficial to the British in defeating the Turks, so there was also something of a debt of honour on the part of the British as regards trying to meet the aspirations of Arab nationalists. It was against this political backdrop that Howard Carter discovered the long-lost tomb of Tutankhamun in the Valley of the Kings.
The tomb’s discovery was a great coup for Carter and Lord Carnarvon and was major world-wide news, establishing them as heroes in the eyes of the public and putting Egypt very much in the limelight. However, Carter had long been in dispute with Egypt’s Antiquities Service and its ruling body the Ministry of Public Works, which reached its climax in the winter digging season of 1923-24. This led Carter’s archaeological team to down tools and go on strike. Unfortunately, this resulted in the Egyptian authorities retaliating by withdrawing Lady Carnarvon’s (who had taken over the financial backing of the project from her late husband) concession to dig in the Valley, leaving Carter out of work and in despair.
Carter was perplexed by the British government’s refusal to put pressure on the Egyptian government to reissue the concession and allow him back into the tomb. Carter eventually decided to take matters into his own hands and stormed into offices of the British High Consul in Cairo where he threatened that ‘unless he received complete satisfaction and justice, he would publish for the whole world to read the documents that he found in the tomb giving the true account according to the Egyptian Government of the exodus of the Jews from Egypt’. Although many have since argued that it was all a bluff on Carter’s part and that such documents never existed, Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald in their book Tutankhamun the Exodus Conspiracy argue that this was no idle threat. Carter would seem to believe that he possessed highly controversial information regarding the Biblical story of the Exodus, which if revealed would not only call into question the rudiments of the biblical story that was crucial to the foundation of ancient Israel but would also undermine the Zionist case for the establishment of a modern Jewish state on the same soil and with it the British Mandate for Palestine. Carter’s high standing and profile with the world media at that moment in time would have enabled him to deliver his findings to the widest possible audience. The results would not doubt have been like an explosive bombshell going off and the ensuing political crisis may have fatally undermined Zionist claims over Palestine, which had effectively been underwritten by the Balfour Agreement. It should be noted that the incident was recorded by an eyewitness, a gentleman called Lee Keedick, who produced a typewritten account of the meeting in Cairo:
“Realising the potentialities of such a threat, when Great Britain was having such trouble on account of the Balfour promises to both the Jews and the Arabs, the Vice Royal lost his temper completely and let fly at Carter’s head an ink well that stood on his desk that was half full of ink … Eventually cooler heads prevailed and an adjustment was made so that Carter was silenced and the threat never materialised. "
Eventually, on 13 January 1925, after a compromise had been reached, some 11 months after Carter and his colleagues had downed tools and gone on strike, a new concession was granted to Carter, as archaeological agent for Lady Carnarvon, and Carter resumed his excavation of the boy king’s tomb.
However, there may have been an added factor in Carter’s evident attempt to blackmail the authorities in granting him back his concession. Amongst the most prominent supporters of the Zionist plan for the establishment of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine (Eretz Israel) were senior members of the Rothschild family. We should keep in mind here that the Balfour Declaration had been addressed to Lionel Walter de Rothschild, a leading Zionist who had worked closely alongside Chaim Weizmann in the lead-up to the signing of the document. Moreover, there are very strong reasons to believe that Lady Almina Carnarvon was the illegitimate daughter of Alfred de Rothschild who was the grandson of the founder of the British branch of the House of Rothschild, the wealthiest and most powerful Jewish family in Europe. It would seem that an impoverished Lord Carnarvon had approached Alfred de Rothschild and agreed to marry his daughter if he would clear Carnarvon’s substantial existing debts and provide the couple with a large marriage dowry. Hence, it would seem to have been Rothschild money that had backed Carter’s expedition. However, by 1922-23 Carnarvon was once more suffering financial difficulties. By that time Alfred de Rothschild had died and left a vast fortune to his daughter and her two children by Lord Carnarvon.
Collins and Ogilvie-Herald speculate whether Carnarvon’s financial plight led him to concoct a plan by which he might have intended to persuade certain leading Zionist Jews to pay some kind of financial remuneration to himself and Carter to cover the continuing costs of the dig in return for Carter and himself not revealing the contents of ancient Egyptian documents discovered in the tomb that were of such a highly sensitive nature that they were best kept private. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald readily admit there is no hard evidence that any such blackmail attempt was ever carried out. However, they argue that if it was, then the most obvious candidates to whom it may have been directed was Carnarvon’s own in-laws, the Rothschilds, since they had most to lose by the derailment of the planned Jewish National Home in Palestine.
In the end Carter never divulged the contents of the papyri and the matter was quietly forgotten. As a highly respected Egyptologist, he could not have backtracked later and admitted that he had removed from the tomb papyrus documents that had never been catalogued or recorded in the first place. This almost certainly would have meant the end of his career as an Egyptologist and the lucrative lifestyle that went with being a successful author, public lecturer and after-dinner speaker. There is no way he would have jeopardised all of this. As the authors state, there is no absolute proof that the Exodus papyri ever actually existed but then neither can it be proved that they didn’t exist. If they did, what became of them? Did Carter choose to destroy them out of fear they may one day fall into the wrong hands? Could they be languishing in some forgotten drawer of a museum somewhere or could they have been passed on to a third party with a vested interest in keeping them secret, who either destroyed them or put them in a bank safety-deposit box where they remain to this day?
However, there may have been an added factor in Carter’s evident attempt to blackmail the authorities in granting him back his concession. Amongst the most prominent supporters of the Zionist plan for the establishment of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine (Eretz Israel) were senior members of the Rothschild family. We should keep in mind here that the Balfour Declaration had been addressed to Lionel Walter de Rothschild, a leading Zionist who had worked closely alongside Chaim Weizmann in the lead-up to the signing of the document. Moreover, there are very strong reasons to believe that Lady Almina Carnarvon was the illegitimate daughter of Alfred de Rothschild who was the grandson of the founder of the British branch of the House of Rothschild, the wealthiest and most powerful Jewish family in Europe. It would seem that an impoverished Lord Carnarvon had approached Alfred de Rothschild and agreed to marry his daughter if he would clear Carnarvon’s substantial existing debts and provide the couple with a large marriage dowry. Hence, it would seem to have been Rothschild money that had backed Carter’s expedition. However, by 1922-23 Carnarvon was once more suffering financial difficulties. By that time Alfred de Rothschild had died and left a vast fortune to his daughter and her two children by Lord Carnarvon.
Collins and Ogilvie-Herald speculate whether Carnarvon’s financial plight led him to concoct a plan by which he might have intended to persuade certain leading Zionist Jews to pay some kind of financial remuneration to himself and Carter to cover the continuing costs of the dig in return for Carter and himself not revealing the contents of ancient Egyptian documents discovered in the tomb that were of such a highly sensitive nature that they were best kept private. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald readily admit there is no hard evidence that any such blackmail attempt was ever carried out. However, they argue that if it was, then the most obvious candidates to whom it may have been directed was Carnarvon’s own in-laws, the Rothschilds, since they had most to lose by the derailment of the planned Jewish National Home in Palestine.
In the end Carter never divulged the contents of the papyri and the matter was quietly forgotten. As a highly respected Egyptologist, he could not have backtracked later and admitted that he had removed from the tomb papyrus documents that had never been catalogued or recorded in the first place. This almost certainly would have meant the end of his career as an Egyptologist and the lucrative lifestyle that went with being a successful author, public lecturer and after-dinner speaker. There is no way he would have jeopardised all of this. As the authors state, there is no absolute proof that the Exodus papyri ever actually existed but then neither can it be proved that they didn’t exist. If they did, what became of them? Did Carter choose to destroy them out of fear they may one day fall into the wrong hands? Could they be languishing in some forgotten drawer of a museum somewhere or could they have been passed on to a third party with a vested interest in keeping them secret, who either destroyed them or put them in a bank safety-deposit box where they remain to this day?
Perhaps we will never know the answer, but then I suppose we could always ask the Cassiopaeans. Any volunteers?
Here's something else. It is now known that the pig has many biological similarities with man.
Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution - Nature
This study presents the assembly and analysis of the genome sequence of a female domestic Duroc pig and a comparison with the genomes of wild and domestic pigs from Europe and Asia; the results shed light on the evolutionary relationship between European and Asian wild boars.
www.nature.com
Here's something else. It is now known that the pig has many biological similarities with man.
Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution - Nature
This study presents the assembly and analysis of the genome sequence of a female domestic Duroc pig and a comparison with the genomes of wild and domestic pigs from Europe and Asia; the results shed light on the evolutionary relationship between European and Asian wild boars.
I was aware of this. For many years it has been suggested by scientists that because pigs have such a similar DNA to man, their organs could be used for human transplant purposes. However, I understand that this has been resisted up to now because of the dangers inherent in the interspecies transfer of viruses from pigs to man. Just think of the swine flu scare a few years ago.
However, I am intrigued by the C's answer to Laura when she asked whether some codon of human DNA that relates to a "tribal code structure" was spliced into an animal, presumably the pig. The C's said in response to her question "close", so I wonder how we could get closer still? The C's have confirmed that viruses are a means of evolution by causing DNA changes. Could STS beings have genetically engineered a virus within pigs, which when it was transferred to human specimens created a new hybrid human with the RU 353535 tribal code structure, resulting perhaps in a scaled down version of the Nephilim? This point may link with what the C's said in the session dated 19 April 1997:
However, I am intrigued by the C's answer to Laura when she asked whether some codon of human DNA that relates to a "tribal code structure" was spliced into an animal, presumably the pig. The C's said in response to her question "close", so I wonder how we could get closer still? The C's have confirmed that viruses are a means of evolution by causing DNA changes. Could STS beings have genetically engineered a virus within pigs, which when it was transferred to human specimens created a new hybrid human with the RU 353535 tribal code structure, resulting perhaps in a scaled down version of the Nephilim? This point may link with what the C's said in the session dated 19 April 1997:
Q: Am I correct in my assessment that the origin of the Grail stories was the story of the Head of Bran?
A: But what was the "origin" of Brahna?
Q: Well, from the way I am interpreting what I have found, I have two possibilities: One is the Celts from Kantek, and two: a Nephilim hybrid.
A: Could be one and the same.
Q: Well, from what you have said in prior sessions, these bloodlines can be of positive or negative orientation, a duality, and that they lead to super-secret power sources. Is that correct?
A: Well, the duality is existent concommitantly through all bloodlines, but in the so-called Celts, it is more pronounced, therefore, there are more vivid power cells and centres.
[…]
Q: Okay, I will keep digging. How can I find if there is going to be a connection between the Aryan/Jewish bloodline of Jesus and the Merovingian/Plantagenet bloodline? Does it exist?
A: Only to the extent of the shared origins of the Essenes and the Celts.
If by "Essenes" the C's were referring to the Jewish Essenes of Christ's time whose origins lay in ancient Egypt, as we have previously discussed, then their response is letting us know that the Essenes shared a common origin with the Celts.
I have speculated that the 'Head of Bran' (perhaps the pure crystal skull the Knights Templar found and referred to as Baphomet) may be connected to the Grail, which we know Abraham/Moses had in his possession after Nefertiti/Sarah stole it from Akhenaten and gave it to him in her guise as Rachel, the wife of Jacob. I have also speculated that 'Bran' and 'Brahna' may be references to the biblical Abram or Abraham, as he later became known. If I am right, the C's response suggests that Abraham (a Hittite/Scythian Celt by origin) may have been one of these new Nephilim hybrids along with some of his Hittite/Levite kinsmen. If so, does this suggest that Abraham was aware of this special bloodline of the Aramaic/Aryan/Hittite/Levites (which also included Nefertiti with her elongated head) and he recognised the fact by overseeing the blood covenant entered into by the Israelites on Mount Sinai:
Q: At the making of the Covenant at Mt. Sinai, there was a bunch of sacrificed animals, and Moses took the blood, dividing it in half, he cast one half on the altar. Taking the book of the covenant, he read it to the people, and they said 'we will observe all that Yahweh has decreed. We will obey.' And then Moses took the blood and cast it on the people saying 'this is the blood of the covenant that Yahweh has made with you containing all these rules.' What is this blood of the covenant?I have speculated that the 'Head of Bran' (perhaps the pure crystal skull the Knights Templar found and referred to as Baphomet) may be connected to the Grail, which we know Abraham/Moses had in his possession after Nefertiti/Sarah stole it from Akhenaten and gave it to him in her guise as Rachel, the wife of Jacob. I have also speculated that 'Bran' and 'Brahna' may be references to the biblical Abram or Abraham, as he later became known. If I am right, the C's response suggests that Abraham (a Hittite/Scythian Celt by origin) may have been one of these new Nephilim hybrids along with some of his Hittite/Levite kinsmen. If so, does this suggest that Abraham was aware of this special bloodline of the Aramaic/Aryan/Hittite/Levites (which also included Nefertiti with her elongated head) and he recognised the fact by overseeing the blood covenant entered into by the Israelites on Mount Sinai:
A: Has to do with bloodline.
Q: So this symbolized the bloodline of the Jews?
A: No.
Q: What bloodline are we talking about here?
A: Aramaic/Aryan.
If by "Essenes" the C's were referring to the Jewish Essenes of Christ's time whose origins lay in ancient Egypt, as we have previously discussed, then their response is letting us know that the Jewish Essenes shared a common origin with the Celts, which ultimately leads back to the planet Kantek.
One factor which may be a possible marker for these new hybrids is red hair. By tradition, Abraham was supposed to have had red hair, as did King David and, much later, Jesus Christ (who the C's said had strawberry blonde hair as a child). Moreover, some of the Plantagenet kings of England mentioned by Laura also had red hair, as did their Norman kinsmen such as William the Conqueror and his son and successor William Rufus. One such example of a red haired Plantagenet was King Richard the Lionheart (1157-1199) who was said to be very attractive, his hair being between red and blond (ginger), and he was light-eyed with a pale complexion. Richard's father, Henry II, was Angevin-Norman and the great-grandson of William the Conqueror, the first Norman king of England. According to Clifford Brewer, Richard was 6 feet 5 inches (1.96 m) tall, although that is unverifiable since his remains have been lost. This would have been huge by the standards of the day and, if true, might certainly betray Nephilim genes. Indeed, this notion may be supported by a familial legend since according to Angevin family tradition, there was even 'infernal blood' in their ancestry, with a claimed descent from the fairy, or female demon, Melusine. Melusine was a figure of European folklore, a female spirit of fresh water in a holy well or river. She is usually depicted as a woman who is a serpent or fish from the waist down, much like a mermaid. This tradition may be linked with the similar tradition concerning the origins of the Merovingians, the ruling family of the Franks, who were supposedly descended from a sea-beast called a Quinotaur (a beast of Neptune). In the past, this tale was regarded as an authentic piece of Germanic mythology and was often taken as evidence that the Merovingian kingship was sacral and the royal dynasty of supernatural origin. However, unlike the Anglo-Saxon kings of England who claimed descent from the god Woden (the Norse Odin), the Merovingians never claimed descent from a god. Nevertheless, these ancient legends of a supernatural origin for the Plantagenet and Merovingian dynasties may betray their special hybrid genetics and possibly connect them to the Hittite/Levite hybrid bloodline too.
As for the red hair connection, let us recall that many of the tales of giants (the Nephilim) have depicted them as having red hair and this includes the fabled Tuatha de Danann of Ireland, the Easter Island giants and the red haired giants of Lovelock Cave in Nevada. Could STS beings have taken these giants' genetics and tweaked them to produce a scaled down hybrid version with red hair?
Red hair is the rarest natural hair colour in humans. It is found in only 1–2% of the world's population, appearing with greater frequency (2–6%) among people of Northern or North-western European ancestry and lesser frequency in other populations. Characterised by high levels of the reddish pigment pheomelanin and relatively low levels of the dark pigment eumelanin, it is associated with fair skin colour, lighter eye colour, freckles, and sensitivity to ultraviolet light. These characteristics may all point to a Kantekkian origin and are also closely linked with the Celts. Ireland has the highest number of red-haired people per capita in the world, with the percentage of those with red hair at around 10%. Great Britain also has a high percentage of people with red hair. In Scotland, around 6% of the population has red hair, with the highest concentration of red head carriers in the world found in Edinburgh, making it the red head capital of the world. Although I don't have red hair myself, I am fair skinned, freckled and blue-eyed like many Irish Celts. I do, however, have two red-headed sons (one auburn and one ginger), which shows that I have in my DNA the recessive gene that produces red hair.
Red hair is also found amongst the Ashkenazi Jewish populations. In 1903, 5.6% of Polish Jews had red hair. Other studies have found that 3.69% of Jewish women overall were found to have red hair, but around 10.9% of all Jewish men have red beards. The stereotype that red hair is Jewish remains in parts of Eastern Europe and Russia. In European culture, before the 20th century, red hair was often seen as a stereotypically Jewish trait: during the Spanish Inquisition, all those with red hair were identified as Jewish.
This preponderance of red heads amongst Jewish populations and the Celts of the British Isles may be indicative of the Aramaic/Aryan bloodline the C's spoke of, which could link the Hittite/Levites, who would go on to become the Israelites (with their mixed Aramaic/Aryan ancestry), the Jewish Essenes and the Celts together. The Israelites were, of course, a Semitic people and the C's confirmed that the Semites were in fact Aryans in the session dated 20 October 2005:
One factor which may be a possible marker for these new hybrids is red hair. By tradition, Abraham was supposed to have had red hair, as did King David and, much later, Jesus Christ (who the C's said had strawberry blonde hair as a child). Moreover, some of the Plantagenet kings of England mentioned by Laura also had red hair, as did their Norman kinsmen such as William the Conqueror and his son and successor William Rufus. One such example of a red haired Plantagenet was King Richard the Lionheart (1157-1199) who was said to be very attractive, his hair being between red and blond (ginger), and he was light-eyed with a pale complexion. Richard's father, Henry II, was Angevin-Norman and the great-grandson of William the Conqueror, the first Norman king of England. According to Clifford Brewer, Richard was 6 feet 5 inches (1.96 m) tall, although that is unverifiable since his remains have been lost. This would have been huge by the standards of the day and, if true, might certainly betray Nephilim genes. Indeed, this notion may be supported by a familial legend since according to Angevin family tradition, there was even 'infernal blood' in their ancestry, with a claimed descent from the fairy, or female demon, Melusine. Melusine was a figure of European folklore, a female spirit of fresh water in a holy well or river. She is usually depicted as a woman who is a serpent or fish from the waist down, much like a mermaid. This tradition may be linked with the similar tradition concerning the origins of the Merovingians, the ruling family of the Franks, who were supposedly descended from a sea-beast called a Quinotaur (a beast of Neptune). In the past, this tale was regarded as an authentic piece of Germanic mythology and was often taken as evidence that the Merovingian kingship was sacral and the royal dynasty of supernatural origin. However, unlike the Anglo-Saxon kings of England who claimed descent from the god Woden (the Norse Odin), the Merovingians never claimed descent from a god. Nevertheless, these ancient legends of a supernatural origin for the Plantagenet and Merovingian dynasties may betray their special hybrid genetics and possibly connect them to the Hittite/Levite hybrid bloodline too.
As for the red hair connection, let us recall that many of the tales of giants (the Nephilim) have depicted them as having red hair and this includes the fabled Tuatha de Danann of Ireland, the Easter Island giants and the red haired giants of Lovelock Cave in Nevada. Could STS beings have taken these giants' genetics and tweaked them to produce a scaled down hybrid version with red hair?
Red hair is the rarest natural hair colour in humans. It is found in only 1–2% of the world's population, appearing with greater frequency (2–6%) among people of Northern or North-western European ancestry and lesser frequency in other populations. Characterised by high levels of the reddish pigment pheomelanin and relatively low levels of the dark pigment eumelanin, it is associated with fair skin colour, lighter eye colour, freckles, and sensitivity to ultraviolet light. These characteristics may all point to a Kantekkian origin and are also closely linked with the Celts. Ireland has the highest number of red-haired people per capita in the world, with the percentage of those with red hair at around 10%. Great Britain also has a high percentage of people with red hair. In Scotland, around 6% of the population has red hair, with the highest concentration of red head carriers in the world found in Edinburgh, making it the red head capital of the world. Although I don't have red hair myself, I am fair skinned, freckled and blue-eyed like many Irish Celts. I do, however, have two red-headed sons (one auburn and one ginger), which shows that I have in my DNA the recessive gene that produces red hair.
Red hair is also found amongst the Ashkenazi Jewish populations. In 1903, 5.6% of Polish Jews had red hair. Other studies have found that 3.69% of Jewish women overall were found to have red hair, but around 10.9% of all Jewish men have red beards. The stereotype that red hair is Jewish remains in parts of Eastern Europe and Russia. In European culture, before the 20th century, red hair was often seen as a stereotypically Jewish trait: during the Spanish Inquisition, all those with red hair were identified as Jewish.
This preponderance of red heads amongst Jewish populations and the Celts of the British Isles may be indicative of the Aramaic/Aryan bloodline the C's spoke of, which could link the Hittite/Levites, who would go on to become the Israelites (with their mixed Aramaic/Aryan ancestry), the Jewish Essenes and the Celts together. The Israelites were, of course, a Semitic people and the C's confirmed that the Semites were in fact Aryans in the session dated 20 October 2005:
Q: (Galahad) In reading through the transcripts* in the 9/11 book, I was confused about the genetic tweak that was made 130,000 years ago. Was that a tweak that was done to all the Semites, so it wasn’t only the Jews?
[* Session 23 August 2001:
Q: (L) Once before you talked about the "mission destiny profile prior encoding" of the Semitic genetic code structure. Of course, you talked about this being done 130,000 years ago, so that's a long time. But, was that original code structure put into the genetic code of the Black peoples...
A: Yes.
Q: ... to then be spread via their mixture with Aryans - as Semites - into other races?
A: Partly.
Q: (L) What is the other part?
A: Genetic tweaking of Semites.]
A: Question is what is a Semite?
Q: (Galahad) You make a remark that this thing with Hitler goes off planet. So was this something that was going on on Kantek before it exploded?
A: Yes.
Q: (Galahad) Did the Semites have a significant role in the collapse of Atlantis?
A: Indeed!
Q: (Galahad) So, when we’re looking at a replay, we’re REALLY looking at a replay!
A: Yup.
Q: (Discussion of who are the Semites) (Galahad) So the real Semites are the Aryans?
A: You got it!
Q: (L) So that means that the rank and file of Jews that have carried the tradition, the Arabic types, just took on the tradition and carried it... They were just intermediaries. They stole the significator of the original Semites and applied it to themselves. (Perceval) Semites is like Middle Eastern, isn’t it?
A: Is it? Was it?
Q: (Galahad) Then the genetic tweak, was it made in the Aryan Semites or was it made in the Jews that we know as Jews today?
A: Aryan. Reason for destruction of Jews of the “Abrahamic” line.
This last response tells us that Abraham, as a Semite, was also an Aryan, albeit of Indo-European stock.
Curiously, in ancient Egypt, red hair was associated with the trickster god of chaos and disorder, Set. I will have more to say about Set and his strange connection to the ancient Israelites' prohibition against the eating of pork in my next post. However, Set is not the only god to be associated with red hair as the Norse god Thor, son of Odin, is usually described as having red hair too.
So could red hair be the calling card of those of the bloodline of the Mosaic covenant and the special Nephilim hybrids exemplified by the Hittite/Levite - Abraham/Moses?
As to the genetic alteration which produced these scaled down Nephilim hybrids, the C's mentioned this oddly in relation to a question about Freemasonry:
A: Yes.
Q: Well, how high do you have to go to get to know anything?
A: Page 33. Blond and blue-eyed, of course! Before genetic alteration, one branch stood eleven feet tall.
The C's also mentioned a genetic tweak that was made to the Indo-Europeans, some of whom would go on to become the Hittites/Levites, in the session dated 20 August 2001:
Q: All right, first question is, what is the origin of the Levites?
A: Hittites Moon Worshippers.
Q: Well, before the Hittites became Hittites, what were they?
A: Indo-europeans.
Q: What was the source of the Indo-europeans?
A: Aryan sub-race.
Q: Is there any other group the Aryans mixed with to produce the Indo-Europeans?
A: Fourth Density genetic tweak.
Q: Was Abraham a Levite?
A: Yes.
Q: Was Sarah Nefertiti?
A: Yes.
Q What was the reason for the strange skull shape of Nefertiti and her family?
A: Genetic tweak.
Q: Was this 4th density genetic tweak done by STS or STO?
A: STS
You will note that the C's did not say the Aryans mixed with any another group to produce the Indo-Europeans (who derived originally from an Aryan sub-race) but said instead that there was some STS 4th density genetic tweak made to them. Could this be the same genetic tweak that the C's said had been made to the Semites (see above), which would therefore have included the Aryan sub-race that became the Indo-Europeans?
They also mention that Nefertiti (a Levite like Abraham) owed her strange elongated skull to a genetic tweak. This makes me wonder whether Abraham/Moses, her fellow Levite, also had a large extended skull as a result of the same genetic tweak. It is also curious that some Merovingian skulls discovered in Dark Age gravesites have been found to have been elongated in shape like Nefertiti's skull. I would suggest this is no coincidence and cannot be explained away by infant skull stretching techniques, as still practiced in some African and South American cultures.
If the Hittite Levites were the special hybrid bloodline that the C's spoke of, then the Levites (supposedly of the Israelite tribe of Levi) deserve much closer inspection. I hope to return to this particular subject in a later post.
This post started by looking at the role the pig may have played in the genetic manipulation of the RU 353535 tribal code structure. In my next post, I will look at the possible origins of the Jewish dietary prohibition against the eating of pork, which seem to lie originally in Egypt and not Israel. I may then stay with the ancient Egyptian/Israelite theme in the following post too, with a plausible explanation as to how Judaism may have taken advantage of the series of disasters that befell Egypt in the reigns of Akhenaten and his father Amenhotep III, which, as a result, would lead to the worship of the monotheistic Aten.
After that, I hope to return to the Rosicrucians with new information on the Orphic Circle and the role Benjamin Franklin, as a Rosicrucian, played in establishing the United States of America in the image of Sir Francis Bacon's New Atlantis.
As always, I appreciate your feedback.
They also mention that Nefertiti (a Levite like Abraham) owed her strange elongated skull to a genetic tweak. This makes me wonder whether Abraham/Moses, her fellow Levite, also had a large extended skull as a result of the same genetic tweak. It is also curious that some Merovingian skulls discovered in Dark Age gravesites have been found to have been elongated in shape like Nefertiti's skull. I would suggest this is no coincidence and cannot be explained away by infant skull stretching techniques, as still practiced in some African and South American cultures.
If the Hittite Levites were the special hybrid bloodline that the C's spoke of, then the Levites (supposedly of the Israelite tribe of Levi) deserve much closer inspection. I hope to return to this particular subject in a later post.
This post started by looking at the role the pig may have played in the genetic manipulation of the RU 353535 tribal code structure. In my next post, I will look at the possible origins of the Jewish dietary prohibition against the eating of pork, which seem to lie originally in Egypt and not Israel. I may then stay with the ancient Egyptian/Israelite theme in the following post too, with a plausible explanation as to how Judaism may have taken advantage of the series of disasters that befell Egypt in the reigns of Akhenaten and his father Amenhotep III, which, as a result, would lead to the worship of the monotheistic Aten.
After that, I hope to return to the Rosicrucians with new information on the Orphic Circle and the role Benjamin Franklin, as a Rosicrucian, played in establishing the United States of America in the image of Sir Francis Bacon's New Atlantis.
As always, I appreciate your feedback.
The Roots of Jewish Pork Abstinence
Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts ate a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination?
A: Trichinosis used to be non-existent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this.
Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichinosis*, and the Aryans were not?
A: Originally.
Q: So, it was necessary for the Jews not to eat the pork, but not for the Aryans, and the mixing caused susceptibility.
*Trichinosis, also known as trichinellosis, is a parasitic disease caused by roundworms of the Trichinella type.
The Levitical Prohibition against Pork
The religious rules against the eating of pork are to be found in the Pentateuch, especially in Chapter 11 of Leviticus:
“And the swine, because he parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, but cheweth not the cud, he is unclean unto you. Of their flesh you shall not eat, and their carcases ye shall not touch: they are unclean unto you.”
“The most likely answer is that the prohibition is pre-Israelite in origin and that it was preserved in Israel after its religious origins were forgotten. After all, Jews and Muslims of today abstain from eating pork without knowing why, except that it is forbidden by the Torah and by the Koran. And it is quite possible that this revulsion for the pig, which became second nature to the Israelites, was reinforced by the ritual usage which they saw made of it in certain pagan rites.”
The Pig as the Unclean Animal in Egypt
“… the swineherds, notwithstanding that they are of pure Egyptian blood, are forbidden to enter into any of the temples, which are open to all other Egyptians, and further, no one will give his daughter in marriage to a swineherd, or take a wife from among them, so that the swineherds are forced to intermarry amongst themselves. They do not offer swine in sacrifice to any of their gods, except Bacchus (Osiris) and the Moon, whom they honour in this way at the same time, sacrificing pigs to both of them at the same full moon, and afterwards eating of their flesh.”
“… the Egyptians are convinced that the Sow is an abomination to the sun and the moon. Accordingly, when they hold the festival of the moon, they sacrifice Pigs to her once a year, but at no other seasons are they willing to sacrifice them either to her or any other god.”
Finally, Aelian mentions that according to the 4th Century B.C. Greek astronomer Eudoxus of Cnidus, the Egyptians refrained from sacrificing pigs because, once the corn was sown, herds of them trod and pressed the seeds in order that they remained fertile and were not consumed by birds.
The Black Pig
Moreover, through his association with his son Sobek, a crocodile-headed god, Set was also venerated in the form of a crocodile, especially at the Temple of Kom in southern Egypt. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald tell us that through the predominance of the cult of Sobek in the Nile’s Eastern Delta, Set of Ombos was venerated with great passion in that region. Thus, at temples in the area of Tell ed-Dab’a, which was the ancient city of Avaris, and Pi-Ramesse, Sobek was worshipped by successive kings of Egypt’s 13th dynasty (circa 1786-1700), some of whom bore names honouring Sobek. However, the kings of this dynasty venerated the female ruler Sobek-nofru, a devotee of Sobek, as a deity. You may recall from my earlier article on Queen Sobeknofru or Sobekneferu titled Bram Stoker and the Jewel of the Seven Stars that she may have formed the basis for Bram Stoker’s fictitious Queen Tera in his book The Jewel of the Seven Stars. Sobekneferu’s coronation name was Sobekkara, which means “Sobek is the soul (ka) of Ra (the sun-god).”
Head of the crocodile god Sobek from the site of the Labyrinth at Hawara. It dates to the reign of Amenemhat III.
Credit: Wiki Commons Agreement, 2020.
Q: At the making of the Covenant at Mt. Sinai, there was a bunch of sacrificed animals, and Moses took the blood, dividing it in half, he cast one half on the altar. Taking the book of the covenant, he read it to the people, and they said 'we will observe all that Yahweh has decreed. We will obey.' And then Moses took the blood and cast it on the people saying 'this is the blood of the covenant that Yahweh has made with you containing all these rules.' What is this blood of the covenant?
A: Has to do with bloodline.
Q: So this symbolized the bloodline of the Jews?
A: No.
Q: What bloodline are we talking about here?
A: Aramaic/Aryan.
Q: (L) So, from 1627 BC to 1588 BC - that's 39 years – alto most exactly 40 years of "wandering in the desert," so to say. So they must have escaped when Thera blew and forty years later, the comets came. What was Abraham and his crew doing during that time?
A: Bedouins.
and:
Q: (L) When did this tribe finally arrive in Israel and settle down. Was this after 40 years living as Bedouins?
A: Pretty much.
If, as I have argued in recent articles, the Israelites or Hebrews, whose successors are today the Jewish people, were originally Hittite Scythian Celts, then where did the prohibition against the eating of pork derive from, since modern Celts are prolific pork eaters (just think of ham, bacon, pork sausages, pork pies, pork ribs and roast pork joints etc.), as were their Celtic ancestors, as archaeologists are amply able to testify given the prolific remains of pig bones found at Celtic sites throughout Europe. Indeed, the Celts even had a pig god, as mentioned in my previous post, and the pig or boar was certainly viewed by them as an animal fit to be offered in sacrifice to their deities. Hence, there seems to have been no notion of the pig being an unclean or impure animal where the ancient Celts were concerned. So where and when did this notion arise and when did the biblical Israelites incorporate a prohibition against eating pork into their religious strictures?
It seems strange to us today that the eating of pork was, and still is, very widespread among Aryan peoples, particularly the Celts, whereas the eating of pork was proscribed by the Jewish faith, but the C’s supplied the following explanation for this:
It seems strange to us today that the eating of pork was, and still is, very widespread among Aryan peoples, particularly the Celts, whereas the eating of pork was proscribed by the Jewish faith, but the C’s supplied the following explanation for this:
Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts ate a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination?
A: Trichinosis used to be non-existent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this.
Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichinosis*, and the Aryans were not?
A: Originally.
Q: So, it was necessary for the Jews not to eat the pork, but not for the Aryans, and the mixing caused susceptibility.
*Trichinosis, also known as trichinellosis, is a parasitic disease caused by roundworms of the Trichinella type.
Within the C’s answer may lie the vital clue, since the C’s are saying that the Aryans were originally not susceptible to trichinosis until they started mixing with non-Aryans. As we know, the mixing of Scythian Celts with non-Aryans first took place in Asia and then in the Middle East (Mesopotamia, Syria, Egypt, Canaan and Anatolia (Turkey) - where Abraham/Moses, the founder of Judaism, came from). Hence, we should probably look at the Middle East to see where the roots of the Jewish dietary proscription against the eating of pork may lie. In my last article, I quoted extensively from Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald’s book Tutankhamun: The Exodus Conspiracy and I will do so again, as they devoted a whole appendix of their book to this particular subject.
The Levitical Prohibition against Pork
The religious rules against the eating of pork are to be found in the Pentateuch, especially in Chapter 11 of Leviticus:
“And the swine, because he parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, but cheweth not the cud, he is unclean unto you. Of their flesh you shall not eat, and their carcases ye shall not touch: they are unclean unto you.”
A similar injunction can also be found in Chapter 14 of Deuteronomy. The authors point out that although these regulations probably date to the end of the 7th Century B.C. when sweeping religious reforms were made in order to standardise the worship of Yahweh, they no doubt reflected an older tradition of pork abstinence that reached back to a time when the first Israelites settled in the central highlands of Palestine. Archaeo-zoologists have discovered that sites in the Palestinian central highlands in the Late Bronze Age (circa 1550-1200 B.C.) contain the remains of pigs, reared and probably eaten as part of a staple diet, whereas those sites that thrived in the Iron Age (circa 1200-585 B.C.), which coincides with the establishment of the Kingdom of Israel under King David, contain almost none at all. By way of contrast, in Iron Age sites located in surrounding regions that were the territories of Israel’s traditional enemies (e.g., the Philistines), pig bones are found in abundance. Scholars such as Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman have proposed that the absence of pig bones among Iron Age communities in the central highlands defined their inhabitants as being proto-Israelites. They suggest this indicates that these proto-Israelites were emerging for the first time with their own individual ethnicity, as marked out by distinctive culinary practices and dietary customs. However, they also clearly recognised that the traditions of Exodus and covenant came much later in time. Thus, they state that half a millennium before the composition of the biblical texts, with its detailed laws and dietary regulations, the Israelites chose for reasons that are not entirely clear, not to eat pork.
So where did this prohibition against the eating of pork come from if it was only formalised in the biblical texts half a millennium after the Israelites’ arrival in Palestine? Collins and Ogilvie-Herald quote a possible answer from the biblical archaeologist Roland de Vaux:
So where did this prohibition against the eating of pork come from if it was only formalised in the biblical texts half a millennium after the Israelites’ arrival in Palestine? Collins and Ogilvie-Herald quote a possible answer from the biblical archaeologist Roland de Vaux:
“The most likely answer is that the prohibition is pre-Israelite in origin and that it was preserved in Israel after its religious origins were forgotten. After all, Jews and Muslims of today abstain from eating pork without knowing why, except that it is forbidden by the Torah and by the Koran. And it is quite possible that this revulsion for the pig, which became second nature to the Israelites, was reinforced by the ritual usage which they saw made of it in certain pagan rites.”
Collins and Ogilvie-Herald point out that scholars are generally agreed that the origins of pork abstinence among the early Israelites were derived from reasons of health, placement, distribution, religion, and politics. In the main though, proto-Jewish pig taboos are considered to have emerged primarily for reasons of hygiene. Pigs were considered unclean, uncouth animals, used on rubbish dumps to dispose of waste materials, and were often riddled with tapeworms (which, as we saw above, could cause Trichinosis). There was also the naïve belief that diseases, such as leprosy, could be transmitted simply by contact with pigs or by drinking their milk. This is an important point since we have learned from the C’s, and from historical records of the period, that leprosy and other diseases were rife in the Middle East during the time of the Israelite Exodus. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald conclude that these considerations make perfect sense and unquestionably played a role in the development of religious rules concerning the prohibition of pork among the Israelite tribes. However, the authors then pose the question whether it is possible that this tradition may reflect ideas that stemmed not from Palestine (Canaan) but from ancient Egypt instead and, if so, whether it was linked to the Egyptian association of the pig with the trickster god Set.
The Pig as the Unclean Animal in Egypt
Collins and Ogilvie-Herald rely first on the 5th century B.C. Greek historian and traveller Herodotus, who spent a considerable amount of time in Egypt recording the country’s customs and traditions, to support their hypothesis. Herodotus noted that the Egyptians considered the pig as ‘an unclean animal’, so much so that if a man in passing accidently touched a pig, he instantly hurried to the river and plunged in with all his clothes on. He went on to state:
“… the swineherds, notwithstanding that they are of pure Egyptian blood, are forbidden to enter into any of the temples, which are open to all other Egyptians, and further, no one will give his daughter in marriage to a swineherd, or take a wife from among them, so that the swineherds are forced to intermarry amongst themselves. They do not offer swine in sacrifice to any of their gods, except Bacchus (Osiris) and the Moon, whom they honour in this way at the same time, sacrificing pigs to both of them at the same full moon, and afterwards eating of their flesh.”
He further tells us that when sacrificed at the full moon, the pig’s tail, spleen and the caul (a membrane covering the sacrificed animal’s intestines) were put together and, after being covered with all the fat found in the animal’s belly, were burned together straightaway and what remained of the victim was eaten the same day. At any other time, they would not so much as taste it. In the case of sacrificial rites to Osiris (the Egyptian god of the underworld), the animal was sacrificed at the door of the god’s temple, before being carried away by the swineherd from who it had been furnished.
The 1st Century Roman biographer and moralist Plutarch also recounted how in Egypt, although the pig was seen as an impure animal, it was offered up once a year as a sacrifice to the moon goddess Selene. The 2nd Century Roman naturalist and historian Aelian had much to say about the pig’s standing in ancient Egypt too. According to him, the beast ‘in sheer gluttony does not spare even its own young’ and if it ‘comes across a man’s body it does not refrain from eating it’. For these reasons, the Egyptians detested ‘the animal as polluted and omnivorous'. Aelian cited the Egyptian historian Manetho as having said “that one who has tasted of sow’s milk becomes covered with leprosy and scaly eruptions”. This highlights the connection the Egyptians, like the proto-Israelites, made between the pig and leprosy, which may derive from the era of the biblical plagues of Egypt that ensued in the aftermath of the eruption of Thera, as discussed in my recent article Abraham, Moses, Akhenaten, Meritaten and the Cassiopaeans. Aelian observed that:
The 1st Century Roman biographer and moralist Plutarch also recounted how in Egypt, although the pig was seen as an impure animal, it was offered up once a year as a sacrifice to the moon goddess Selene. The 2nd Century Roman naturalist and historian Aelian had much to say about the pig’s standing in ancient Egypt too. According to him, the beast ‘in sheer gluttony does not spare even its own young’ and if it ‘comes across a man’s body it does not refrain from eating it’. For these reasons, the Egyptians detested ‘the animal as polluted and omnivorous'. Aelian cited the Egyptian historian Manetho as having said “that one who has tasted of sow’s milk becomes covered with leprosy and scaly eruptions”. This highlights the connection the Egyptians, like the proto-Israelites, made between the pig and leprosy, which may derive from the era of the biblical plagues of Egypt that ensued in the aftermath of the eruption of Thera, as discussed in my recent article Abraham, Moses, Akhenaten, Meritaten and the Cassiopaeans. Aelian observed that:
“… the Egyptians are convinced that the Sow is an abomination to the sun and the moon. Accordingly, when they hold the festival of the moon, they sacrifice Pigs to her once a year, but at no other seasons are they willing to sacrifice them either to her or any other god.”
Finally, Aelian mentions that according to the 4th Century B.C. Greek astronomer Eudoxus of Cnidus, the Egyptians refrained from sacrificing pigs because, once the corn was sown, herds of them trod and pressed the seeds in order that they remained fertile and were not consumed by birds.
Although the pig’s revulsion may have stemmed from considerations of hygiene and cleanliness, its place in Egyptian society was connected directly with rites and rituals surrounding Set, the god of chaos and disorder, who was the ruler of burning desert wastes. A story that confirms Set’s form as a pig is a myth concerning the coming into being of the powerful Egyptian symbol of the Eye of Horus. The 112th chapter of the Egyptian Book of the Dead speaks of how one day the sun god Re (Ra) said to Horus “Let me see what is coming to pass in thine eye”. On looking, Re tells Horus “Look out that black pig”, at which the falcon god sustained immediately an injury to his eye. It transpires that the party causing the injury to Horus’s eye was none other than Set, who had transformed himself into a black pig. Consequently, Re ordered that henceforth the pig was to be cast out as an abominable creature.
Set also appears as a pig in the myth of Osiris, the god of the underworld, after he had been slain by his evil brother Set. Isis, Osiris’s widow, flees to the Nile Delta in order to ensure the safety of her son Horus. Here she took on the shape of a kite to keep watch for the rampaging monster Set, the wild pig, whilst her son Horus, the falcon, remained concealed in the nest. Another such tale, which seems to reflect an earlier tradition in which Osiris was slain by Set in the form of a wild boar, tells how Typhon was hunting a boar when he discovered the mangled and slain body of Osiris, and it was for this reason that pigs were sacrificed once a year as an act of vengeance inflicted on the slayer of Osiris. The British anthropologist Sir James Frazer in his classic work The Golden Bough, first published in 1922, argued that originally the pig sacrificed in the name of Osiris was the god himself, in his guise as the spirit of the corn. As we saw above with Eudoxus’ account, there was a clear connection between pigs and corn, where, once the corn was sown, the Egyptians would release herds of pigs to trample down the seeds to prevent them from being eaten by the birds. Frazer believed that it was only in much later times that the pig was seen as a subject of abhorrence and repulsion, fit only to represent the trickster god of chaos and disorder, Set.
The Worship of SetSet also appears as a pig in the myth of Osiris, the god of the underworld, after he had been slain by his evil brother Set. Isis, Osiris’s widow, flees to the Nile Delta in order to ensure the safety of her son Horus. Here she took on the shape of a kite to keep watch for the rampaging monster Set, the wild pig, whilst her son Horus, the falcon, remained concealed in the nest. Another such tale, which seems to reflect an earlier tradition in which Osiris was slain by Set in the form of a wild boar, tells how Typhon was hunting a boar when he discovered the mangled and slain body of Osiris, and it was for this reason that pigs were sacrificed once a year as an act of vengeance inflicted on the slayer of Osiris. The British anthropologist Sir James Frazer in his classic work The Golden Bough, first published in 1922, argued that originally the pig sacrificed in the name of Osiris was the god himself, in his guise as the spirit of the corn. As we saw above with Eudoxus’ account, there was a clear connection between pigs and corn, where, once the corn was sown, the Egyptians would release herds of pigs to trample down the seeds to prevent them from being eaten by the birds. Frazer believed that it was only in much later times that the pig was seen as a subject of abhorrence and repulsion, fit only to represent the trickster god of chaos and disorder, Set.
Although Set’s form as a pig or boar is not in dispute, in ancient Egyptian art and literature, he was more commonly portrayed as a mythical beast like the fenekh, a hybrid form of the desert fox (emphasising his trickster role) or as a hippopotamus. He was also depicted as a human body and the head of the set-animal, carrying a spear in one hand (see image below).
Moreover, through his association with his son Sobek, a crocodile-headed god, Set was also venerated in the form of a crocodile, especially at the Temple of Kom in southern Egypt. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald tell us that through the predominance of the cult of Sobek in the Nile’s Eastern Delta, Set of Ombos was venerated with great passion in that region. Thus, at temples in the area of Tell ed-Dab’a, which was the ancient city of Avaris, and Pi-Ramesse, Sobek was worshipped by successive kings of Egypt’s 13th dynasty (circa 1786-1700), some of whom bore names honouring Sobek. However, the kings of this dynasty venerated the female ruler Sobek-nofru, a devotee of Sobek, as a deity. You may recall from my earlier article on Queen Sobeknofru or Sobekneferu titled Bram Stoker and the Jewel of the Seven Stars that she may have formed the basis for Bram Stoker’s fictitious Queen Tera in his book The Jewel of the Seven Stars. Sobekneferu’s coronation name was Sobekkara, which means “Sobek is the soul (ka) of Ra (the sun-god).”
Head of the crocodile god Sobek from the site of the Labyrinth at Hawara. It dates to the reign of Amenemhat III.
Credit: Wiki Commons Agreement, 2020.
The Victorian mythologist Gerald Massey (1828-1907) singled out queen Sobekneferu as reviving this age-old “Typhonian” cult, which centred around the hippopotamus goddess Tawaret or Reret (the concubine of Seth) and the crocodile god as a form both of Set and of Sobek. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald conclude that it was Sobekneferu who introduced the worship of Sobek and Set into the Eastern Delta of the Nile and not any king of the 13th dynasty.
However, from our perspective, it is important to note that the 13th dynasty ran concurrently with the 14th dynasty (circa 1786-1575 B.C.) which were then brought to a close when the Asiatic Hyksos warlords overran Egypt around 1730 -1650 B.C. and established their capitol city at Tell ed-Dab’a or Avaris. Since this city had been the cult centre of Sobek, the crocodile god, and his father Set, the god of borderlands, frontiers and the ‘divine stranger’, he soon became synonymous with the attributes of the Hyksos’ own god Baal. Henceforth, this new composite deity was venerated under the name of Sutekh (the Babylonian rendering of Set) and even after the expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt his cult thrived in the Eastern Delta. Sometime after his 34th regnal year, Pharaoh Rameses II (the son of Seti I, a devotee of Set like his father Rameses I before him) set up a commemorative stone known as the ‘400 years stela’, which was found at Tanis. The ‘400 years stela’ proclaims the veneration of Set by the king’s immediate ancestors including his great-grandfather Sethos, who featured in Manetho’s story of Osarsiph - the priest from Heliopolis who led a revolt amongst the Hyksos captives or slaves against the Pharaoh (either Amenhotep III and/or his co-regent Akhenaten), which may form the basis of the Jewish figure of Moses, the biblical lawgiver. The stela shows the pharaoh paying homage to Set in his Semitic form of Baal, or Sutekh, complete with a human body and conical-shaped crown. The deity’s distinctive features depict him as an Asiatic and he thus appears in his guise as the ruler of foreign territories.
Although the worship of Set had to go underground during Akhenaten’s reign, it was revived in the reign of Horemheb, particularly within the Eastern Delta. Indeed, Horemheb commissioned the construction of an enormous temple of Set at Tell ed-Dab’a/Avaris directly over a much earlier cult site, which appears to have been an Asiatic temple almost certainly dedicated to Sutekh.
The Line of Transmission of the Pig’s ProhibitionHowever, from our perspective, it is important to note that the 13th dynasty ran concurrently with the 14th dynasty (circa 1786-1575 B.C.) which were then brought to a close when the Asiatic Hyksos warlords overran Egypt around 1730 -1650 B.C. and established their capitol city at Tell ed-Dab’a or Avaris. Since this city had been the cult centre of Sobek, the crocodile god, and his father Set, the god of borderlands, frontiers and the ‘divine stranger’, he soon became synonymous with the attributes of the Hyksos’ own god Baal. Henceforth, this new composite deity was venerated under the name of Sutekh (the Babylonian rendering of Set) and even after the expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt his cult thrived in the Eastern Delta. Sometime after his 34th regnal year, Pharaoh Rameses II (the son of Seti I, a devotee of Set like his father Rameses I before him) set up a commemorative stone known as the ‘400 years stela’, which was found at Tanis. The ‘400 years stela’ proclaims the veneration of Set by the king’s immediate ancestors including his great-grandfather Sethos, who featured in Manetho’s story of Osarsiph - the priest from Heliopolis who led a revolt amongst the Hyksos captives or slaves against the Pharaoh (either Amenhotep III and/or his co-regent Akhenaten), which may form the basis of the Jewish figure of Moses, the biblical lawgiver. The stela shows the pharaoh paying homage to Set in his Semitic form of Baal, or Sutekh, complete with a human body and conical-shaped crown. The deity’s distinctive features depict him as an Asiatic and he thus appears in his guise as the ruler of foreign territories.
Although the worship of Set had to go underground during Akhenaten’s reign, it was revived in the reign of Horemheb, particularly within the Eastern Delta. Indeed, Horemheb commissioned the construction of an enormous temple of Set at Tell ed-Dab’a/Avaris directly over a much earlier cult site, which appears to have been an Asiatic temple almost certainly dedicated to Sutekh.
“Hyksos” was in fact a generic Egyptian term for the Asiatic invaders, which included numerous nomadic tribes entering Egypt from neighbouring Canaan and the Levant including perhaps the Habiru (Egyptian Apiru - who may have become the biblical Hebrews). The Hyksos were Semitic speakers whose ancestors had been Scythian Celts who had migrated through Anatolia (Turkey), into Mesopotamia, Syria and finally into Lebanon, Jordan, Canaan, and Egypt, intermixing with the indigenous peoples as they went. This mixing of their Aryan blood with the Aramaic peoples of Syria, for example, may explain the comments the C’s made in the session dated 26 December 1998:
Q: At the making of the Covenant at Mt. Sinai, there was a bunch of sacrificed animals, and Moses took the blood, dividing it in half, he cast one half on the altar. Taking the book of the covenant, he read it to the people, and they said 'we will observe all that Yahweh has decreed. We will obey.' And then Moses took the blood and cast it on the people saying 'this is the blood of the covenant that Yahweh has made with you containing all these rules.' What is this blood of the covenant?
A: Has to do with bloodline.
Q: So this symbolized the bloodline of the Jews?
A: No.
Q: What bloodline are we talking about here?
A: Aramaic/Aryan.
Q: Are you saying that the Jews are Aramaic/Aryan?
A: No. Jews are not bloodline categorizable, per se.
As we learned from the C’s elsewhere, Moses was a Hittite, as were the members of the Levite priesthood, who may therefore represent the Aramaic/Aryan bloodline the C’s are referring to above, as discussed in my previous post.
Since the Hyksos embraced the worship of Set most fully when at Avaris, it seems likely that they would have made sacrifices to the god. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald point out that this is attested in one account dating back to the Ramesside period, which related to the Hyksos king Apophis (1608-1575 B.C.). Apophis is said to have made Set his personal god and to have served no other in the land except him. A fine temple was built for the god, situated next door to the ’House of Apophis’ and here the king ‘appeared [every] day to make daily sacrifice to Seth’ (Set). There is, however, no indication that any of these sacrifices were of pigs and at the site of Tell ed-Dab’a’s main Hyksos temple, archaeological evidence has come to light in the form of countless sacrificial burnt offerings over a period of many years, which indicates that pigs were never sacrificed there. As Austrian Egyptologist Manfred Bietak has commented with respect to these archaeological findings “It looks as if, for offerings to the gods, pigs were already considered as taboo”. Thus, to the two authors, it seems possible that the Hyksos adopted sacrificial religious practices from the native Egyptians.
However, before this statement can be justified, Collins and Ogilvie-Herald point out that the pig is thought to have been venerated in Palestine (Canaan) as early as Palaeolithic times (pre-8,000 B.C.) through to the early Bronze Age (circa 3,500-2200 B.C.) and the Middle Bronze Age (circa 2000-1550 B.C.). Indeed, the two authors point out that the pig or wild boar seems to have been associated with the high god Baal and chthonic, or underworld, deities and would also seem to have been ‘the sacrificial animal par excellence’ in later ages. As I noted earlier, this point is certainly true of the Celts whose main god was Belenos or Bel - the Shining God - who may be associated with the Canaanite Baal and Bel of the Babylonians. More significantly, it is known that there was widespread abstinence of pig meat among the Phoenicians of Syria and Lebanon, the inhabitants of Cyprus, the pre-Islamic Arabs and many other Semitic-speaking peoples of the ancient world. I don’t know if this list includes the Hittites, the Wilusans (who were possibly Trojans from whom Abraham/Moses may have descended – see my previous article Abraham, Moses, Akhenaten and the Cassiopaeans) and the Dardanians of Anatolia, who I suspect were all originally Celtic peoples. Since the Hittites were moon worshippers, they may have sacrificed pigs like the Egyptians did to the Moon and later the moon goddess Selene.
Despite this knowledge, the authors state that there is no evidence of pork abstinence among the Late Bronze Age sites excavated in Palestine/Canaan, implying a different line of dietary law transmission for the earliest Iron Age I communities of the central highlands. Thus, it is the two authors’ belief that the tradition of pork abstinence originated in Egypt’s Eastern Nile Delta at the time of the Hyksos, and this was adopted by later Asiatic settlers (such as the Shasu and Hapiru) in the post-Hyksos period, the tradition later being carried out of Egypt into the central highlands of Palestine in the wake of the collapse of the Amarna period under Pharaoh Akhenaten, which the authors believe to be the true timeframe of the biblical Exodus (as confirmed by the Cssiopaeans). Although the earliest Iron Age I settlements dated back no earlier than 1200-1100 B.C., the authors suggest a period of perhaps a hundred years or so should be allowed for the migration and permanent settlement of these peoples, which if they were the Israelites makes perfect sense, since the C’s confirmed that the Israelites had wandered in the Sinai Desert for a period of 40 years or so as nomadic Bedouin tribesmen before their conquest of Canaan, which started with the fall of Jericho under Joshua:
A: No. Jews are not bloodline categorizable, per se.
As we learned from the C’s elsewhere, Moses was a Hittite, as were the members of the Levite priesthood, who may therefore represent the Aramaic/Aryan bloodline the C’s are referring to above, as discussed in my previous post.
Since the Hyksos embraced the worship of Set most fully when at Avaris, it seems likely that they would have made sacrifices to the god. Collins and Ogilvie-Herald point out that this is attested in one account dating back to the Ramesside period, which related to the Hyksos king Apophis (1608-1575 B.C.). Apophis is said to have made Set his personal god and to have served no other in the land except him. A fine temple was built for the god, situated next door to the ’House of Apophis’ and here the king ‘appeared [every] day to make daily sacrifice to Seth’ (Set). There is, however, no indication that any of these sacrifices were of pigs and at the site of Tell ed-Dab’a’s main Hyksos temple, archaeological evidence has come to light in the form of countless sacrificial burnt offerings over a period of many years, which indicates that pigs were never sacrificed there. As Austrian Egyptologist Manfred Bietak has commented with respect to these archaeological findings “It looks as if, for offerings to the gods, pigs were already considered as taboo”. Thus, to the two authors, it seems possible that the Hyksos adopted sacrificial religious practices from the native Egyptians.
However, before this statement can be justified, Collins and Ogilvie-Herald point out that the pig is thought to have been venerated in Palestine (Canaan) as early as Palaeolithic times (pre-8,000 B.C.) through to the early Bronze Age (circa 3,500-2200 B.C.) and the Middle Bronze Age (circa 2000-1550 B.C.). Indeed, the two authors point out that the pig or wild boar seems to have been associated with the high god Baal and chthonic, or underworld, deities and would also seem to have been ‘the sacrificial animal par excellence’ in later ages. As I noted earlier, this point is certainly true of the Celts whose main god was Belenos or Bel - the Shining God - who may be associated with the Canaanite Baal and Bel of the Babylonians. More significantly, it is known that there was widespread abstinence of pig meat among the Phoenicians of Syria and Lebanon, the inhabitants of Cyprus, the pre-Islamic Arabs and many other Semitic-speaking peoples of the ancient world. I don’t know if this list includes the Hittites, the Wilusans (who were possibly Trojans from whom Abraham/Moses may have descended – see my previous article Abraham, Moses, Akhenaten and the Cassiopaeans) and the Dardanians of Anatolia, who I suspect were all originally Celtic peoples. Since the Hittites were moon worshippers, they may have sacrificed pigs like the Egyptians did to the Moon and later the moon goddess Selene.
Despite this knowledge, the authors state that there is no evidence of pork abstinence among the Late Bronze Age sites excavated in Palestine/Canaan, implying a different line of dietary law transmission for the earliest Iron Age I communities of the central highlands. Thus, it is the two authors’ belief that the tradition of pork abstinence originated in Egypt’s Eastern Nile Delta at the time of the Hyksos, and this was adopted by later Asiatic settlers (such as the Shasu and Hapiru) in the post-Hyksos period, the tradition later being carried out of Egypt into the central highlands of Palestine in the wake of the collapse of the Amarna period under Pharaoh Akhenaten, which the authors believe to be the true timeframe of the biblical Exodus (as confirmed by the Cssiopaeans). Although the earliest Iron Age I settlements dated back no earlier than 1200-1100 B.C., the authors suggest a period of perhaps a hundred years or so should be allowed for the migration and permanent settlement of these peoples, which if they were the Israelites makes perfect sense, since the C’s confirmed that the Israelites had wandered in the Sinai Desert for a period of 40 years or so as nomadic Bedouin tribesmen before their conquest of Canaan, which started with the fall of Jericho under Joshua:
Q: (L) So, from 1627 BC to 1588 BC - that's 39 years – alto most exactly 40 years of "wandering in the desert," so to say. So they must have escaped when Thera blew and forty years later, the comets came. What was Abraham and his crew doing during that time?
A: Bedouins.
and:
Q: (L) When did this tribe finally arrive in Israel and settle down. Was this after 40 years living as Bedouins?
A: Pretty much.
Thus, Collins and Ogilvie-Herald believe that the biblical and Graeco-Egyptian and Graeco-Roman traditions of the expulsion of Egyptian and Asiatic peoples from the Egyptian Nile Delta to Palestine in the wake of the Amarna age provides an obvious line of transmission of pig taboos among the earliest Israelites. They point out that if nothing more, the powerful new evidence of pork abstinence among the animal bones found at Iron Age I sites in the central highlands of Palestine/Canaan argues for an Exodus hundreds of years after the expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt.
Conclusion
Hence, the answer to the question I posed at the start of this article as to where the Israelite/Jewish prohibition against the eating of pork came from would appear to be that it was a practice absorbed over several generations by the Asiatic settlers (whose ancestors were Scythian Celts) in Egypt, including the people who would later become the Israelites, from the taboos placed on pigs via ancient Egyptian religious beliefs. This prohibition then travelled with the Israelites first into the Sinai Desert and then into the central highlands of Palestine with the Israelite conquest of Canaan.
Something I want to add in this regard, and I don't know if it has any relation with the last session where the topic of the egregores, the exorcisms and the SRT was discussed... but I kept thinking about the exorcism of the demon of Gerasa, the expulsion of these demons towards the herd of pigs. Somehow this might have some relation to the issue of the pigs being a receptacle for an STS type energy.
In another section, and according to some commentaries when talking about pigs in the esoteric field, it is said that the pig is the only animal that cannot look up (the sky) unlike, for example, a dog or a cat. The answer to this is not only that pigs literally cannot because of a biological characteristic of their bodies, what they are trying to say is that pigs cannot connect or do not have the ability to perceive higher realities (the sky as heaven). Which makes me think that pigs are literally locked into a very specific frequency within the STS.
I had read that supposedly the elongation of the skull has the effect of stimulating the pineal gland.