The Living Force
pr said:Hello everyone,
I hope this is the appropriate location/format to address the following issues; if it's not, please, oh please, tell me!
I'm a newbie to this forum. However, I've spent a considerable amount of time on this globe (BBM) and have gained/been given some understanding of things biblical by ASKING PROPERLY.
Let's just say 'for the sake of discussion' (FTSOD), that 'WHYISTHATSO' (WITS) is/could be a 'petty tyrant' (PT).
This thread is presented with the perfect opportunity to demonstrate a 'self-importance quantity' (SIQ) (that is rotten or not) and 'impeccability quality' (IQ). The action of rechanneling the rotten self-importance is impeccability. It is achieved through six elements that interplay each other: control, discipline, forbearance, timing, will and the PT.
Is this example of postings (that I've read above), the best this site has to offer in demonstrating impeccability and lack of self-importance? If you are trying to achieve a good impression, it's not working. Ridicule, innuendo and petty sarcasm (PS). Are (some of) these examples of how YOU all would LIKE to be treated?
I have read the postings (above) suggesting the inappropriateness of (format) WITS's addition to this thread, but no suggestions where he might post at a better subject location/format. Sure, you may disagree with his perspective; there are more effective, mature and professional ways to disagree with ANYONE than what you are demonstrating. If you don't like what he is "prophetizing", tell him so and why you disagree, as Laura attempted to do (although again, and I DO NOT MEAN TO BE ANTAGONISTIC HERE, but based on the aura of the attitude she displayed, her/your self-importance quantity is too high; one that has raised children can SEE these things).
pr, I'm having some difficulty with the wordiness of your post. Could you take time to be more concise, please, for the sake of all members. Paragraphs with gaps between them also make for much easier onscreen reading.
I think what you are saying is that you picture WITS as a teeny weeny petty tyrant, and in the responses of forum members, you're not seeing the attributes of warriorhood that you expect (or 'require'?)
The purpose of the forum is clearly defined, and so, members strive to work towards this aim. Protecting an environment for low-noise discussion is an essential part of that. Posts that say, for example "Oh, and Laura, one more thing. If you would like you can nail me to a tree also." are clearly highly inappropriate.
Perhaps you misunderstood this little dialogue with WITS? Acting with impeccability does not have to mean running the 'be nice' program.
This might be because you are emotionally identified with the responses, and so are projecting onto it?