Stories of Covid vaccination side effects or worse

whitecoast

The Living Force
FOTCM Member

Vaccines are generally taking five months to kill people, a timeline which shortens with each dosage.


Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people​

The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file. I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen. This is why it's hard to see.​


Steve Kirsch
Sep 1
1,215
955

Note: This article was updated on Sep 4 to incorporate the confirmation with the UK data and on Sept 5 to incorporate Tim Ellison’s work.
The key point is this:
The UK data shows statistical proof of causality of deaths (p<.001): the vaccine doses track with the excess deaths 23 weeks later. Dose dependency is key to showing causality. If no one can explain this, the precautionary principle of medicine requires any ethical society to halt the vaccines now.

Executive Summary​

Many people assumed the vaccine kills you quickly (in the first two weeks) because that’s when people notice the association and report it to VAERS. This is still true; it does kill some people quickly: half of the deaths reported in VAERS are in the first few weeks.​

But the key words are “reported in VAERS.” It turns out that if we don’t have that restriction but are just wondering when most of the deaths after COVID vaccination happen, the answer is different.​

Thanks to a helper who works at HHS, we can now clearly see that most of the deaths from the vaccine are happening an average of 5 months from the last dose. That is for the second dose; it may be getting shorter the more shots you get but there are arguments both ways (since there can be survivor bias). Using data from the UK, we can see more clearly that the delay time is around 23 weeks (so a bit more than 5 weeks). We’ll dive into that shortly.​

This delay explains why the life insurance companies got off-the-charts all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in Q3 and Q4 rather than right after the shots rolled out.​

The five month delay is also consistent with death reports where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a 4 to 6 month period.​

The 5 month death delay was also confirmed using only European data. That analysis was posted Aug 11, but I learned about it after I wrote this post.​

So when you hear of a death from stroke, cardiac arrest, heart attack, cancer, and suicide that is happening around 5 months after vaccination, it could very well be a vaccine-related death.​

The data from the Social Security Administration death master file (ages 18 to 55)​

I got this chart from a whistleblower who works for HHS. This is data you are not supposed to see. The mortality increase (60% at peak) is huge. That sort of increase can only be caused by something novel that affected massive numbers of people.​

There is only one possibility that fits that: the COVID vaccine.​

The peak is September 9, 2021.​

This graph, which is not publicly available, is from the US Social Security death master file. It compares deaths from 2021 to deaths in 2020. You simply cannot get such a rise in deaths like that unless something very deadly is affecting massive numbers of people. This explains why insurance companies all over the world were seeing massive death spikes in Q3 and Q4 of 2021. The vaccine was simply taking an average of 5 months from the most recent injection to kill people. The peak here is September 9, 2021.​

Daily vaccine doses administered in the US​

The peak is April 12, 2021.​

The peak is April 12, 2021.​

Occam’s razor​

The most obvious conclusion is that the vaccine takes an average of 5 months to kill people after the second dose.​

The second peak in December 2021 will result in life insurance companies having spikes in Q1 and Q2 of 2022.​

Here’s what UK Professor Norman Fenton said​

Another analysis using only European data found the exact same 5 month delay!​

An analysis posted at Chris Martenson’s site found the same 5 month delay using different source data! That is really stunning. I had no idea when I wrote my article.​

Here’s the reader comment pointing this outand here’s the comment on Peak Prosperity posted August 9, 2022 which was just a few weeks before I found the same thing from the US data.​

Here’s the full text of that post​

What the figure shows is the “correlation coefficient” as function of a temporal delay, that is, time shift.​

  • a negative time shift indicates that excess mortality is preceding the vaccination status
  • a positive time shift indicates that the administered doses precedes the excess mortality

The optimal time shift is defined as that time shift that maximizes the absolute pearson coefficient. We search for the highest, or the lowest value. The lowest value is around -0.3, while the highest value is around 0.8. Because the absolute value of the highest,+0.8, is larger than the absolute value of the lowest, +0.3, the optimal time shift is + 5 months. That is, Administered Doses precedes Excess mortality.​

As Holden indeed mentioned, we do find a negative relation also when there is no shift. However, the explanatory power of +0.8 is way larger than -0.3.​

The reason why I used “causes” instead of causes is that there are several characteristics of causal relations. What we tested now is “temporal precedence”. An effect can not precede the cause, plus, a cause predicts the effect better than the cause predicts the effect.​

In the cause of observational causality, another important aspect is that the cause should predict the effect better than the effect predicts itself. In this case we indeed find that Excess Mortality predicts itself poorly —of course, for a time delay equal to 0, it does predict itself, for all other time delays, it has little to no explanatory power—.​

From this we can conclude that, based on the data sets used, Administered Doses do cause Excess Mortality.​

Of course, our “brilliant experts” are still stuck in the 19th century wrt statistical methods. I do not expect that they will be able to explain the excess mortality with their current methods, simply because 5 months is a huge time delay, and because here is typically little knowledge of observational causal methods.​

About the method​

The method used is based on correlations. The current state-of-the-art is based on Information Theory, but that’s too out of the ordinary for layman, and even experts, so we better not go there. When I have time in a couple of weeks I might run the information theoretical causal analytics.​

About the data​

As mentioned, the data sets from Holden’s sources were used. We selected only EU countries, we did not differentiate between sexes and age groups. Finally we used monthly data due to time restrictions on my side (I simply do not have time to search for, or create weekly data sets for the excess mortality).​

A third analysis shows a similar delay (Spiro P. Pantazatos, PhD)​

The reaction time for Dose 1 is longer than Dose 1 and 2:​

Click the graph to see the analysis detail.​

A fourth analysis uses UK data only and finds a 23 week lag time with very high statistical significance (John Dee)​

This analysis posted in John Dee’s Almanacis the nail in the coffin for people claiming the vaccines don’t cause death.​

What he found was that the number of COVID vaccine injections can explain a third of the non-COVID excess deaths 23 weeks later. That’s huge. That is causality. The p-value is p<.001.

Note that a p value of 0.1 is typically a max cutoff (for things that don't really matter so much), p<0.05 is "normally" used, and p<0.01 when it really matters a great deal. See this article on p-values for details.​

The precautionary principle of medicine says the vaccine is killing people. It should be stopped.​

He writes:

The coefficient of determination drops out of the grill pan at r-square = 0.335. In plain English this means 33.5% of the variation we see in excess non-COVID death can be explained by variation in combined daily dosing at a lag of 23 weeks together with case detection rate at a lag of 2 weeks. Call that 34% and we have just over a third of excess deaths being explained by this combi boiler.​

And includes this graph:​

A fifth study finds a similar delay (Tim Ellison)​

Tim Ellison finds two death peaks: at 7 weeks and 27 weeks post vaccine. Because the first week is 7 weeks out, the VAERS system is unlikely to see it because it is so far out.​

One possible interpretation: the first peak is due to the first two doses and the second peak is due to getting the next booster. Food for thought. This may make some sense since the booster peak is lower (fewer people get the booster). Or it may just be that the vaccine has two time constants of harm. Or it could be a combination of both!​

Tim also wrote me the following message about his willingness to share his work. You can contact him on his substack.

I'm a skilled and accomplished Ph.D. physicist that can eat GBytes of data for breakfast. See attached resume.​

It would be easy for anyone to verify my results.​

I could send my files (messy, but correct), but folks should independently download the CDC data and do the analysis themselves.​

It only took me a few hours --​

Biggest problem being there are no DATES in the CDC Mortality Data, so one needs to figure out how to convert their Week Numbers to Dates.​

They have TWO week numbers: week 1 being the first week in the new Federal Fiscal year which is the "Beginning of the Flu Season";​

They also have the official week number -- and doing A LOT of Looking, their numbers are for the Saturday (not Sunday) of the official calendar Week number.​

That should save you a lot of time!​

And, I would say, this is what you have been looking for:​

Hard-Data proving Vax's are killing people.​

As you recently pointed out in your "brief" posting, the DATA are overwhelming ...​

Hard Data: All-Cause-Mortality.​

But the gov't keeps pushing the Vax's,​

and people keep rolling up their sleeves.​

I think I'm walking around in a Kafka novel.

Unfortunately for all of us, this is not a novel. I wish it was.​

A sixth study shows the time delay on the US data is 22 weeks​

Another take on the US data shows a 22 week delay in death, further validating my 20 week estimate. Joel pointed out that John used the UK data and found a 23 week delay.​

Joel went further though and estimated that 40% of the excess deaths in ages 18 to 55 were caused (directly or indirectly through increased COVID deaths) by the vaccine.​

So if we assume there were only 153,000 excess deaths in the US in this age range, at least 60,000 of those deaths were caused by the vaccines.​

Isn’t it funny how we will stop production at a baby formula plant when a dozen babies get sick, but we will mandate a vaccine when 60,000 relatively young people are killed, isn’t it?​

Joel also points out that it is clear that the vaccines have caused more deaths than they possibly could have saved.​

It’s funny that nobody has ever challenged Joel on his reasoning. I wonder why?​

The embalmer data gives more insights as to the cause of the double peak​

I disagree with Tim about the booster.​

Read this description of the embalmer data.​

Those clots take a while to form and then kill you.​

The vaccine has at least two major mechanisms of death. One has a short time constant and the other has a longer time constant. That’s why the embalmers didn’t notice these telltale clots until mid-2021.​

The fact that up to 93% of people dying have these clots (which likely killed them) is quite troubling.​

An anecdote​

This is interesting. It’s unlikely that there are example of both parents dying within 1 month of vax, but it’s not hard to find both parents dying around 5 months from vax:​

Another anecdote… that 5 to 6 month figure again!​

The blood doesn’t return to normal for more than 6 months after vaccination. In just 20 minutes, a good tattoo artist can tell who is vaccinated and who isn’t. I tried reaching out to tattoo artists myself to verify this and they just hung up the phone when I asked about this. I wonder why?​

The summer months hypothesis​

Mathew Crawford speculated that the delay was the same in Europe and the US due to similar rollout schedules. He speculates that people are more active in summer and activity that raises your heart rate is more likely to trigger strokes and heart attacks in the vaccinated.​

I agree that this may be a contributing factor, but I don’t know how much.​

Could this be just “Delta”?​

Delta started on July 1, 2021 and ended on December 15, 2021. So we’d expect more of a plateau rather than a sharp peak if it was Delta.​

But we know from the Massachusetts death data obtained under a FOIA request that the cause of death in 2021 shifted to the circulatory system, rather than the respiratory system according to the analysis of the ICD10 codes associated with the death records.​

In addition, the insurance companies confirmed it wasn’t COVID that was causing the excess deaths.​

And then we have plenty of stories of vaccine victims dying around 5 months after the shot.​

And we have the emergency study in Israel showing a 25% increase in calls between January and May, 2021. What’s interesting is that the authors of the paper were not allowed access to the same emergency call data after May, 2021 (they asked and were denied). That’s a huge red flag. COVID doesn’t cause cardiac issues. And the drug companies are trying to get that paper retracted.​

And now we have the disclosure that the Israeli Ministry of Health deliberately withheld vaccine safety data from the people of Israel. It seems the vaccine isn’t as safe as the told people. So when they found that out, they manipulated the data to make it look safe and released the manipulated report, something that is clearly illegal and unethical. The mainstream press refused to cover the story.​

So the evidence seems more consistent with vaccine deaths than COVID deaths.​

Alternate hypotheses​

If someone has a better explanation for this data, I’d love to hear it.​

It does appear from reading the comments that it makes sense to reader and explains what they personally observed.​

If any fact checker wants to challenge me on this, you can use the Contact Form and let’s have a recorded conversation.​

The CDC doesn’t want to talk about this. They also won’t tell us why they aren’t showing us this data.​

For sure, the NY Times and rest of the mainstream media will ignore this and won’t ask any questions. Maybe Tucker Carlson will talk about it.​

Implications for the Canadian doctor death data​

Armed with this new knowledge, we should stop looking just for deaths proximate to the vaccine and look at the overall death rate in Canada of young doctors, e.g., doctors 50 and younger. What I found when I did that is that the number of young doctor deaths in Canada increased by a factor of 2.5X in 2021 vs. 2020 (15 deaths vs. 6). I’ve requested the data for earlier years to see how this compares​

Summary​

It was wrong to assume that most of the vaccine-related deaths were happening shortly after vaccination. Some are, but most are not. It’s just that they were easier to notice when there was temporal proximity to the jabs.​

If someone you know died around 5 months after vaccination, you should definitely have a proper autopsy done as described in my earlier interview with Ryan Cole.​

Please share this info.​

 

Ellipse

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Undertakers overwhelmed in Australia.jpg
Undertakers are experiencing a rush of business with Australians dying in abnormally high numbers in a 'worrying' trend doctors can't explain.

Martin Masson, who is managing director of Tribute Funeral Services in the western Melbourne suburb of Ravenhall, said there is no shortage of work for him and others in the industry as official figures confirm Aussies are dying at a higher rate in 2022.

'We’ve been consistently busy now since the first of this year,' Mr Masson told Daily Mail Australia.

'We have certainly seen an increase in the need for our services as have done a lot of other directors.'

Mr Masson believed more working age Australians are dying but doesn't have specific statistics to back this.

'We certainly have seen a distinct shift back to people in their 60s, 50s and even late or mid 40s and even younger,' he said.

Mr Masson revealed he had been asked a number of times about increased death rates but had no particular explanation other than Covid being 'let rip'.
 

Dylou

The Force is Strong With This One

Tuatha de Danaan

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Don't know if I'm posting in the right thread but the C's said to not live in an echo chamber and off load worries here on the Forum. So here I am.

Two days ago I was reading a local newsfeed where a lady said she'd had her invitation from the NHS to go and have her next booster shot. She said if she didn't take the invitation with her she'd be refused. That second bit amused me and I told my husband. He replied that he had received his and he was booked in to take it.
Well I simply froze but the thought "well I'm not going to take care of you if you are sick"
immediately came to me. I was appalled at that thought but so angry as well.

He's had three jabs already and been very lucky, but how many time do you tempt providence???? Over the past year we have avoided talking about these jabs because I could tell he was uncomfortable but every now and then I'd mention some new study or suchlike in a casual manner.

I know mentally that this is his choice and I must practice external consideration but I'm afraid this anger is staying with me.All his thoughts are pre-concieved about the Economy, Russia and future hardships. His lack of awareness about what's going on out there may be the cause of my anger but I'm not sure.
This is my husband of 47 years and to think such an awful thought about him and on the flip side worry about how difficult it may be in the future without bringing some sickness on himself has left me rudderless.

There, I've got that off my chest because there is no one I can speak to and if anyone has any advise to get me to shake off this anger and guilt I would be very grateful.
 

PERLOU

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Très chère Tuatha, oui, je comprends votre colère et votre incompréhension...
Mais oui, vous le soignerez avec tout l'amour que vous lui avez toujours donné, parce que vous êtes ainsi...
Candidate au service des autres et respectueuse de son libre arbitre...

Dearest Tuatha, yes, I understand your anger and your incomprehension...
But yes, you will take care of him with all the love you have always given him, because you are like that...
Candidate in the service of others and respectful of his free will...
 

SOTTREADER

The Living Force
Don't know if I'm posting in the right thread but the C's said to not live in an echo chamber and off load worries here on the Forum. So here I am.

Two days ago I was reading a local newsfeed where a lady said she'd had her invitation from the NHS to go and have her next booster shot. She said if she didn't take the invitation with her she'd be refused. That second bit amused me and I told my husband. He replied that he had received his and he was booked in to take it.
Well I simply froze but the thought "well I'm not going to take care of you if you are sick"
immediately came to me. I was appalled at that thought but so angry as well.

He's had three jabs already and been very lucky, but how many time do you tempt providence???? Over the past year we have avoided talking about these jabs because I could tell he was uncomfortable but every now and then I'd mention some new study or suchlike in a casual manner.

I know mentally that this is his choice and I must practice external consideration but I'm afraid this anger is staying with me.All his thoughts are pre-concieved about the Economy, Russia and future hardships. His lack of awareness about what's going on out there may be the cause of my anger but I'm not sure.
This is my husband of 47 years and to think such an awful thought about him and on the flip side worry about how difficult it may be in the future without bringing some sickness on himself has left me rudderless.

There, I've got that off my chest because there is no one I can speak to and if anyone has any advise to get me to shake off this anger and guilt I would be very grateful.
I'm not qualified to give advice so please take this with a healthy pinch of salt.

I think the anger you are feeling is quite normal given the situation. Interestingly, you feeling guilty for feeling angry is also quite normal. 🤪

All I can say is just let the feelings wash over you rather than fight them too much. They are all normal reactions given the situation.

In the end, it doesn't sound like your husband entirely see's eye to eye with you on some of these issues but it's okay if you are tolerant of each others differing viewpoints. In terms of testing providence by continually going for more shots, I'd say one should accept this given there is no other choice unless he wakes up to the situation! You can only hope his health remains resilient.

Fyi, I have close family members who appear powerless to say no and I'm having to accept it because there is no other choice really.
 

Oxajil

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
I'm sorry to hear that, Tuatha de Danaan. It's difficult when loved ones decide to take the vaccine. If he is at least open to take supplements, perhaps you can suggest a few and you could say something along the lines of "it's usual for people to get flu-like symptoms after vaccination, this could help prevent that or help you heal faster if you do". Just an idea, if he's open to it.
 

Tuatha de Danaan

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
If he is at least open to take supplements, perhaps you can suggest a few and you could say something along the lines of "it's usual for people to get flu-like symptoms after vaccination, this could help prevent that or help you heal faster if you do". Just an idea, if he's open to it.
Thanks for the suggestion Oxajil but this subject was mentioned by me before his previous jab. He does not want to talk about it any more (his own words).
 

Bluefyre

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I'm so sorry you are dealing with this Tuatha. I am not in a similar situation but it seems to me that it is understandable that anger is one of your reactions and perhaps sorrow underneath. Sometimes we have to dig deep within us for any sense of peace and acceptance. :hug2:
 

Tuatha de Danaan

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
All I can say is just let the feelings wash over you rather than fight them too much. They are all normal reactions given the situation.
Thanks SOTTREADER, words of wisdom and a balm. Like I mentioned I'm not to sure the reason for the anger but I did realise that muttering to myself wasn't helping. Maybe a build-up of the past few years and just needed an outlet. Thanks again.
 

Dylou

The Force is Strong With This One
Hello Tuatha,
I don't know if what I'm about to write can help you, but I'm going through a situation somewhat similar to yours. My daughter, my partner and her son were vaccinated so that they could have a social life more in line with the one we had before COVID. The anger I felt was directed primarily at the politicians, but also at me for not being able to convince them not to get vaccinated. Despite my warnings, which they did not hear, I respected their free will.
The finish line is the same for all of us, but the starting point of the races in our lives is unique to each of us.
As I have read on the forum, psychological shocks linked to major events (911...) are conducive to the liberation of consciousness. The next one, which seems to be a computer blackout, should not be long in coming. It may be a liberating event for the people we love.
I don't know why some people are more sensitive to awakening than others. Why what seems obvious to us is not obvious to our loved ones? I don't know, but it seems to me that this is a situation that many of us share on the forum.
Your anger is just and you should not blame yourself for feeling it. Perlou has given you an answer full of wisdom and truth, your love for your loved ones is an answer to get you out of this anger.
 
Top Bottom