Session 7 September 2013
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
lilies
The Living Force
The Emotional part
The real question regarding Jesus and Caesar for the C's:
Was Caesar the incarnation of the Great Spiritual Being who is referred to as The Christ?
It follows that the Jesus person referred to in the sessions is same.
I emphasized references below. The issue is the following: It would be nice if there was a person "prayers can go to", namely Jesus / Caesar. Not really for fervent prayers every night, rather for the reassurance of the existence of such a spiritual being of great power.
Thank You for reading.
The real question regarding Jesus and Caesar for the C's:
Was Caesar the incarnation of the Great Spiritual Being who is referred to as The Christ?
It follows that the Jesus person referred to in the sessions is same.
I emphasized references below. The issue is the following: It would be nice if there was a person "prayers can go to", namely Jesus / Caesar. Not really for fervent prayers every night, rather for the reassurance of the existence of such a spiritual being of great power.
Thank You for reading.
Graalsword
Jedi Council Member
Laura said:
This also makes me think about how some psychopaths deteriorate when they loose power, so in this case could it be that the deterioration is due to the higher level psychopaths pressing on them(presidents) to follow the agenda, making them less popular, less liked by the masses, therefore their rapid aging and deterioration?
Session 941005
Q: (L) If one repeatedly calls upon Jesus does one get repeated replications or additional strength, power or whatever?
A: No.
Q: (L) In other words, once one has truly made the connection, that's it?
A: That's all that's needed.
Q: (L) Are any of us able to replicate in this manner if we so desire?
A: Could if in same circumstance. The way the process works is thus: When Jesus left the earth plane, he went into another dimension or density of reality, whereupon all "rules" regarding the awareness of time and space are entirely different from the way they are perceived here. At this point in space time his soul which was/is still in the physical realm, was placed in a state of something akin to suspended animation and a sort of advanced form of unconsciousness. From that point to the present his soul has been replicated from a state of this unconsciousness in order that all who call upon him or need to be with him or need to speak to him can do so on an individual basis. His soul can be replicated ad infinitum--as many times as needed. The replication process produces a state of hyper- consciousness in each and every version of the soul consciousness.
Is this where He dies for you(r sins) comes from?
Each time asked, he dies and replicates?
Q: (L) If one repeatedly calls upon Jesus does one get repeated replications or additional strength, power or whatever?
A: No.
Q: (L) In other words, once one has truly made the connection, that's it?
A: That's all that's needed.
Q: (L) Are any of us able to replicate in this manner if we so desire?
A: Could if in same circumstance. The way the process works is thus: When Jesus left the earth plane, he went into another dimension or density of reality, whereupon all "rules" regarding the awareness of time and space are entirely different from the way they are perceived here. At this point in space time his soul which was/is still in the physical realm, was placed in a state of something akin to suspended animation and a sort of advanced form of unconsciousness. From that point to the present his soul has been replicated from a state of this unconsciousness in order that all who call upon him or need to be with him or need to speak to him can do so on an individual basis. His soul can be replicated ad infinitum--as many times as needed. The replication process produces a state of hyper- consciousness in each and every version of the soul consciousness.
Is this where He dies for you(r sins) comes from?
Each time asked, he dies and replicates?
Marcus-Aurelius
Jedi Master
Thank you Château crew for another great session!
I think yes, as far as they are offered something sufficiently important for their interests. This was the case with Libya whereas they were opposed to any intervention until France offered them a military transport ship if I remember well. They were trying to buy it for some time, but the USA was opposed the deal, until it was suddenly agreed and NATO was bombing Libya some days later.
But I think this will be difficult for Syria, the sacrifice must be enormous for the USA before Russia accepts as Syria is closer to their borders and strategically more important in the region for them. Leaving it to the West will mean accepting to be circled by USA puppets allies!
Just my thoughts on this!
seek10 said:
I think yes, as far as they are offered something sufficiently important for their interests. This was the case with Libya whereas they were opposed to any intervention until France offered them a military transport ship if I remember well. They were trying to buy it for some time, but the USA was opposed the deal, until it was suddenly agreed and NATO was bombing Libya some days later.
But I think this will be difficult for Syria, the sacrifice must be enormous for the USA before Russia accepts as Syria is closer to their borders and strategically more important in the region for them. Leaving it to the West will mean accepting to be circled by USA puppets allies!
Just my thoughts on this!
Forrestdeva
Padawan Learner
Thank you Laura and Team for the session.
I wonder, are the Cs saying that people who believe in lies lose their psychic abilities if they ever had them, or they didn't have them to begin with? Or they had them but in a limited way? Dogs are loyal and friendly, and they guard people, and this person is obviously pretty much the contrary. So what's the deal with the comparison apart from meaning that her "psychic abilites" are not good? Why would they compare this person to Cherie? Maybe I'm reading too much into it...
Zadius Sky
The Living Force
Ailén said:
Good question as I'm wondering the same thing. The dogs can "sense" about people as to whether they're bad or good while being charged by pleasant or unpleasant sensations. Perhaps that can be applied to the person in question? They can "sense" some things about anything (people, nature, etc.) and more they lie, the more they "filter" what they're sensing. The more they "filter" what they "sensing," the more destructive they can cause to others and themselves?
Just speculating here. :)
Ailén said:
Note: NR = {name redacted}
I also wondered about what the C's said about NR's abilities... The thing with dogs is that they often do appear to be psychic, and I think often they are - possibly moreso than humans in some instances. But, at the same time, they have a whole different perception of the world than we do. Their sight is different, their hearing is better, their sense of smell is WAAAAY better than ours, etc. I also read something recently about dogs and electric fields, or something like that... Dunno, can't find it now... So, when I think about all that, sometimes I wonder if our Little Furry Friends are simply perceiving things we normally don't with their normal senses, and then something happens, and then we go, "Oh, the dog is psychic!"
Well, sometimes I still think they ARE psychic, but the point is that I wonder if NR is the type of person where things are perceived so differently that they "pick up" on things and then must run around like crazy trying to warn others about these perceived "threats".
Several of our doggies are "storm warning systems". Sometimes they are agitated hours in advance. But at the same time, I can look at a weather forecast, or go outside and sniff the air, or notice that I have sinus pressure which usually indicates a change in barometric pressure... and then I say, "Weather's changing!" If it's sunny, that probably means it's going to rain. Of course the doggies don't realize that we can look out the window and see the coming storm clouds, or that we can see live radar images of an approaching front, and so on.
So, when the C's said NR is about as psychic as Cherie, my thoughts/reactions were as follows:
1.
Those C's are funny!2. :/ Hang on a minute, Cherie DOES seem pretty psychic sometimes...
3. But then is what we think of as psychic really actually psychic?
4. When the Storm Warning Doggies go bonkers due to a storm or something, it isn't really protecting or warning us, because we usually know about it if we're paying attention. And we're ALWAYS paying attention!
If we were NOT paying attention, then it would be a warning - psychic or not. But, that's kind of the point: NR ran around "warning" us of all kinds of stuff that:
a) we already knew about, or that we already knew MORE about than NR
b) isn't really a dire threat that requires being super-agitated
c) to NR is the End of the World, or close to it (in terms of the drama generated, including/especially in other people)
Regarding a) above, NR has been a rather vigorous promoter of various things that we have come to the opposite conclusion about after careful investigation. IOW, NR promotes things that we would not promote, and vice versa.
In any case, whereas the doggies just need some lovies and reassurance that everything is okay, the humans are okay, and a "Thanks for the warning!", NR just sat there and continued to bark at max volume, even after the storm had passed. Once this kind of individual gets ahold of the bone, there ain't no lettin' go!
Or, put another way: If an intruder tried to break into the house here, the doggies would know, and they would sound the alarm (and probably eat at least part of the intruder). But they will also bark like crazy at rabbits, moles, and plenty of other non-threats that WE know are not threats, but they don't because they're just doing their Doggie Jobs. They see the neighbor every day, and they bark like mad at him, probably because after he's done feeding his dogs, he always goes away. And then they think, "Good job, guys! We scared him away again! High five!!!"
In this sense, NR and similar types actually COULD be useful to a small extent... The problem is that we don't need this type of "guard dog" on the forum; we need aware humans!
Zadius Sky
The Living Force
Interesting, Mr. Scott. Thanks for sharing. :)
Mr. Scott said:
I think it may be both. Alister Hardy (author of the Living Stream) hypothesized that animals should have psi (he used a continuity argument similar to that used to support panpsychism: if humans have psi abilities, something similar should be found all the way down the evolutionary ladder, at least in some rudimentary form). Since Hardy's time, I think there's been enough evidence to suggest he was right, e.g., Sheldrake's research on animals who know their owners are coming home. Interestingly, Sheldrake found that while mammals show some apparent psi abilities, reptiles do not. This matches with the human psi evidence that suggests such abilities are tied with emotions, especially bonding.
Added: That said, comparing human to animal psi may be like comparing human to animal cognition. Animals don't 'think' like we do, they act instinctively. So a human could conceivable have some psi abilities, but totally misinterpret them according to their own skewed emotions and unconscious purposes. Kind of like our dog here, who thinks every meal is for him. A human might have some psi ability but interpret everything through their own subjective lens.
G
Gertrudes
Guest
Ailén said:
The way I interpreted it is that they were corrupted due to these two women's "filters". As in, the development of a clean and clear psychic ability would go hand in hand with Being.
Approaching Infinity said:
That's how I see it thus far.
Cherie, and apparently NR, showed to be very differently alined from Laura and the type of Work we pursue here. If they are aligned with lies, even though their inbuilt antennae may, for whatever reason, be picking up on frequencies that many of us don't as easily pick up on, it begs the question of what type of frequency they are picking up on, and how they are interpreting that frequency.
If through their thoughts and choices they have created a sense of "being" that will mainly pick up on lies and on a distorted vision of reality, can that be taken as a psychic ability? Maybe it won't, though this is just a guess.
And thank you very much for posting this session
