Session 23 September 2023
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
Petar
Padawan Learner
I agree, they must have been through a lot, seen a lot of things they were not allowed to talk about.
Maybe they couldn't get a live feed of the landing at the time, they have filmed it in the studio with a lot of mistakes, so many people came to the conclusion that the landing never happened.
I came across two videos from Apollo 20 about a huge spacecraft on the moon.
I can't confirm the authenticity of these videos, but with the help of our forum members we can surely get closer to the truth.
Sorry to disappoint you but having researched these videos some years ago, I believe they are faked. What is true though is that NASA had budgeted for and lined up two more Apollo Moon flights after Apollo 17, which would have been Apollos 18 and 19. However, for reasons not altogether clear, they cancelled both flights. There was some nonsense about the US public becoming bored by the Moon landings, which I don't really buy into. Is it more likely that the US was warned off conducting more Moon landings after Apollo 17 by the secret government or the Quorum. Were the Greys finding the landings too intrusive on their territory? Had NASA discovered all it wanted to know or it wished to retrieve from the Moon? Anyway, as a child of the space age, after the initial euphoria of the Moon landings, NASA confined itself to low Earth orbit missions for the next 50 odd years. To my way of thinking, we have stood still for all this time. Perhaps it will take an Elon Musk to move things forward again where manned space missions are concerned.
Lahaina
With over thousands of available rentals, overpriced, and remaining empty, the state and county are looking for other methods to remove victims out of hotels so their counts could go down.
Long story short. NOTHING HAS CHANGED, and Green keeps pushing back the inevitable outcome, which makes him look ridiculous, especially when he, in a suttle tone, tries to bribe the victims with a million dollar settlement. Now to quickly change the subject, let's talk about Red Hill
KaWaiAwaAwa
Jedi Master
Mytja
Jedi Master
Regarding the mold issue, it's good to know the role environment variables play in its creation/prevention, like relative humidity and room temperature. For example, if relative humidity indoors is kept below 50-55% (by dehumidifier home unit for example) mold can't grow. Also, temperatures below freezing point and above 140° F will kill the mold spores.
More about mold handling using environment conditions:
At What Humidity Does Mold Grow? This Knowledge is Power! - Humidifier Compare
At what humidity does mold grow in your house? It grows when humidity level is at least 60%, and spores spread in other rooms.
humidifiercompare.com
Graphic table showing the interplay of environment variables and time needed for the mold to appear/grow:
I can highly recommend the book. I'm halfway through it and it's been a real eye-opener. It's like a history of relentless greed, psychopathy and how modern history still covers it and romanticizes the "cradle" of the Western civilization.
ELT
Jedi
After thought, I very often notice an attractiveness towards long curly hair, both from myself towards it + hearing strangers' remarks towards other people having it, or my own.
It's something that seems to innately catch the attention of some, like if there was an unconscious appeal towards it - which I think there is.
We now have an explanation.
dredger
The Living Force
I found an article which made me remember that the C's recently answered about ... thus i searched a little bit, found that it was during this session, the extract above.
And here is the article that made me thought about this passage of the session :
Freeman Dyson: The whole Earth is greener as a result of increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
According to the late Freeman Dyson, computer models do a good job of helping us understand climate but they do a very poor job of predicting it. “As measured from space, the whole earth is growing…
expose-news.com
Bonus in french, as i initially found it here :
Freeman Dyson : La Terre entière est plus verte grâce à l'augmentation du dioxyde de carbone dans l'atmosphère
Selon le regretté Freeman Dyson, les modèles informatiques vous aident à comprendre le climat, mais ils font du très mauvais travail pour ...
echelledejacob.blogspot.com
Silvano Trotta Officiel
C'est tout de même fou toutes ces découvertes que l'homme fait sur l'environnement de la Terre, alors qu'ils envoient régulièrement des sondes remplies d'instruments dans l'espace, vers la Lune et autres...Et que dire des missions Apollo... lol. Ainsi en 2014 Une équipe de scientifiques...
t.me
Ainsi en 2014 Une équipe de scientifiques dirigée par l'Université du Colorado Boulder a découvert un bouclier invisible de style "Star Trek" qui bloque les soi-disant "électrons tueurs" à 11500 kms au-dessus de la Terre.
Le bouclier, qui forme une barrière au mouvement des particules, a été trouvé dans les ceintures de rayonnement de Van Allen. Les ceintures de rayonnement, qui sont maintenues en place par le champ magnétique de la Terre, sont deux anneaux en forme de beignet qui sont remplis d'électrons et de protons à haute énergie.
« C'est presque comme si ces électrons couraient dans un mur de verre dans l'espace », a déclaré Baker, dans un communiqué. « Un peu comme les boucliers créés par les champs de force sur Star Trek qui ont été utilisés pour repousser les armes extraterrestres, nous voyons un bouclier invisible bloquer ces électrons. C'est un phénomène extrêmement déroutant. »
Les scientifiques ont découvert une limite "extrêmement pointue" au bord intérieur de la ceinture de rayonnement externe, qui semble empêcher les électrons de percer le bouclier et de se déplacer vers l'atmosphère terrestre.
Petit rappel pour un prochain numéro, le taux de radioactivité des ceintures de Van Allen est si élevé que les instruments de mesures de James Van Allen, qui les a découvertes en 1958, ont tous "explosé"....
Mais les astronautes d'Apollo les passaient facile avec leur bidule en papier d'alu... Mais LOL !!
Scientists discover Earth’s ‘Star Trek’-style invisible shield
A team of scientists led by the University of Colorado Boulder has discovered an invisible “Star Trek”-style shield that blocks so-called “killer electrons” 7,200 miles above Earth.
It's amazing all these discoveries that mankind is making about the Earth's environment, when they regularly send probes full of instruments into space, to the Moon and elsewhere... And what about the Apollo missions... lol.
So in 2014 a team of scientists led by the University of Colorado Boulder discovered a "Star Trek"-style invisible shield that blocks so-called "killer electrons" 11500 kms above the Earth.
The shield, which forms a barrier to the movement of particles, was found in the Van Allen radiation belts. The radiation belts, which are held in place by the Earth's magnetic field, are two doughnut-shaped rings that are filled with high-energy electrons and protons.
"It's almost as if these electrons are running through a glass wall in space," said Baker, in a statement. "A bit like the shields created by force fields on Star Trek that were used to repel alien weapons, we're seeing an invisible shield blocking these electrons. It's an extremely puzzling phenomenon."
Scientists have discovered an "extremely sharp" boundary at the inner edge of the outer radiation belt, which appears to prevent electrons from piercing the shield and travelling towards the Earth's atmosphere.
As a reminder for a future issue, the level of radioactivity in the Van Allen belts is so high that the measuring instruments used by James Van Allen, who discovered them in 1958, have all "exploded" ....
But the Apollo astronauts passed them easily with their tinfoil gizmos... But LOL!
Scientists discover Earth’s ‘Star Trek’-style invisible shield
A team of scientists led by the University of Colorado Boulder has discovered an invisible “Star Trek”-style shield that blocks so-called “killer electrons” 7,200 miles above Earth.
Silvano Trotta Officiel
Voici l'ordinateur du vaisseau spatial Apollo. Il disposait d'environ 65 kb de mémoire et d'une vitesse de traitement de 0,045 Mhz. 🤪🤪🤪 Mais Don Pettit, astronaute de la Nasa dit : "Nous ne pouvons pas retourner sur la Lune, nous ne disposons plus de cette technologie." 🤪🤪🤪
t.me
Il disposait d'environ 65 kb de mémoire et d'une vitesse de traitement de 0,045 Mhz.
Mais Don Pettit, astronaute de la Nasa dit :
"Nous ne pouvons pas retourner sur la Lune, nous ne disposons plus de cette technologie."
It had around 65 kb of memory and a processing speed of 0.045 Mhz.
But Don Pettit, Nasa astronaut said:
"We can't go back to the Moon, we don't have that technology any more."
I watched an interview with Momčilo Milinović, a retired engineer and professor at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade. He is an expert in the field of rocket technology.
At 01:08:00 he talks about the Russian rocket to the moon and he mentions something very interesting.
Unlike all previous missions to the moon, this Russian rocket trajectory was something that nobody had ever done before. According to him, it was almost an "artillery" attempt to shoot the rocket and land on the moon. They fired the rocket without any classic circling around the Earth. They circled just a quarter rotation around the Earth and fired directly at the moon. There they had another half or quarter rotation around the moon and they tried to land vertically on the surface of the moon, breaking vertically with powerful braking motors.
According to his words, the technic and the equipment were the masterpieces, the best our science can offer today.
It was an attempt to show the world what are they capable of. To fire a rocket directly to the moon and land vertically. As he says it was a "maniacal" attempt to show the world their capabilities in rocket technic.
They lost control of the rocket in the last phase of the vertical landing. Not in communication, but lost control the control, according to his words.
So if we take the C's answer that the goal was to keep Russia down and embarrassed then somehow the whole story makes sense.
The World government or whoever it was, did not want to allow Russia to publicly present its capabilities in rocket technic. Like, if we can shoot a rocket directly on the moon, then any place on earth is not a problem for us.
They had to publicly admit that they failed, while other countries like India or China succeeded in landing, although they are using classic, by-the-book techniques to do that.
for 50 years. (The man holding the camera is probably a descendant of the cameraman left behind by the Apollo crew. 
BHelmet
The Living Force
Oh PERLOU, how silly. Obviously Odysseus asked a passing alien to help with the selfie!(The man holding the camera is probably a descendant of the cameraman left behind by the Apollo crew.♂)
And what was Ody packing, an iPhone 4 ? judging by the exquisite photo quality.