Scandinavian observations and perspectives

It will be interesting to see if the West launches an investigation into this.
Then people can ask: why was there not an investigation into the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines?? 👍
Coming across the Münchener Merkur newspaper, from Wednesday, October 11, they say that a data cable was also damages and add at the end:
The newspaper iltalehti even reported that the government and the military suspected that Russia had attacked the line.
The idea reported in the Münchner Merkur, that Russia is behind, is not reasonable and very significantly, the German paper does not comment on, or refer to the Nord Stream sabotage in 2022 and all the scandal surrounding that event. The notice however, still appears on the front page, and should raise questions in the minds of thinking people.

Looking up the Norwegian NORSAR, there was:

Seismic signal detected in the vicinity of the Balticconnector gas pipeline

NORSAR has recorded seismic signals near the Balticconnector gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea. The signals indicate a possible explosion at around 01:20, local time in Finland, 8 October 2023.
Seismologists at NORSAR have analyzed data from the Finnish seismic network, including a group of sensors called the FINES seismic array. Data shows a clear event at 01:20, Finnish time, which corresponds with the approximate time that the media reports a drop in pressure in the pipeline. We are unable to determine if the event was caused by a suden release of gas under high pressure, due to rupturing of the pipeiline, or from the detonation of an explosive.

The Figure below shows clear seismic beam signals at the FINES array in southern Finland. The calculated beam points to a signal origin SW of the array.

FINES seismogram
UTC is like GMT, Finland is in + three due to summer time. In other words, from a British and US perspective it was still the birthday of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin.
NORSAR continues:
The event has been located approximately 40 km north of Paldiski, Estonia close to where the Baltic Connector pipeline crosses the Nord Stream 1 pipeline. The magnitude of the event has been estimated at 1.0 on the Richter scale, which is much lower than the Nord Stream explosion detected in September 2022.

Event map

Common questions
Why was the event not found earlier?

The event was relatively small – it has a magnitude of approximately 1. We were able to find it by first looking at the FINES seismic array (part of the International Monitoring System for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty). NORSAR have expertise in seismic array processing, which can be used for identifying weak signals. We have discussed our findings with other seismological institutes from the Nordics where there is broad agreement with the findings.
What does the waveform show?
The figure shows the P-wave and S-wave signals recorded at a seismic array (called ‘FINES’) in Finland. The P-wave and S-wave are different types of seismic waves, which travel at different speeds. The P-wave is the first to arrive and the S-wave is the second to arrive. We can use these different waves to estimate a location, origin time and size of the event. Using a seismic array such as FINES, which is a group of multiple sensors placed in a certain configuration, we can enhance signals from different locations for improved detection. The two 'beams' therefore show the enhanced P-wave and S-wave signals for our estimated location.
Was it definitely an explosion?
There was a sudden energy release that caused an explosive signal. We cannot be sure of the exact cause – for example, sudden rupturing of the pipeline, or detonation of an explosive charge.
How large was the event?
The seismic event had a magnitude of approximately 1 on the Richter scale. We are still estimating what this means in terms of an explosive yield but we are confident that it is equivalent to less than 100 kg TNT. The sudden release of pressure on the pipeline contributes to this size estimate and there are many unknowns in this estimation.
The text was written by:
Ben Dando
Head of Department Test Ban Treaty Verification
What I found interesting was the nearness to the Nord Stream 1 pipeline. Finland is being initiated into NATO and taught how to say that Russia did it without bothering about time for closer investigation. It also happens less than 24 hours after the Hamas action in Israel, so more general chaos.
 
There's been a border tensions going on between Finland and Russia since last October, and Finland has accused Russia of "hybrid operation" by "weaponizing" migrants in order to create a "crisis" in the border:
Border tensions have heightened between Russian and the NATO alliance's newest member Finland. Finland has lately accused Moscow of weaponizing migrants to create a crisis at border crossings.

Russia had vowed "countermeasures" after Finland was admitted into NATO last April. Finland’s Border Guard has since documented what it says is a serious uptick in undocumented migrants showing up at crossings, with most of them having originated in Africa and the Middle East.

The some 830+ mile Russian-Finnish border also serves as the external border of the European Union. EU President Ursula von der Leyen has recently joined Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo in condemning what they called Russia's "instrumentalization of migrants" - with von der Leyen calling it "shameful".

Finland's border authorities have said over 300 undocumented asylum seekers have recently arrived, mostly at four southern crossings which at this point have been closed. In some instances this has led to violence, with border guards having deployed riot control measures to keep migrant groups from breaching the border.
This is, of course, an extremely hyperbolic reaction to a situation, where there's been about total of 700 migrants crossing the eastern border during November. With this pace it would be about 8500 migrants a year. Last year 45 000 Ukrainian refugees came to Finland, and no one saw a problem there.

One can notice the disconnection as Finland is purposely making a mountain out of molehill. The reason why there's been handful of extra migrants arriving daily is because Russia ended the cross-border agreement as a response to Finland's previous provocations, such as ending trade cooperation and discriminating Russian visa applications. Now Russia has stopped their policy to stop migrants who don't have Schengen visa from crossing the border.

So Finland is now trying to propagandize and make this look like some "hybrid operation" in order to avoid admitting that we're purposely escalating things, and that no one in the political system wants to end this process. For them it's useful to have these "exciting" things going on with Russia in order to hysterize the public and keep their attention elsewhere. And likely this all is being encouraged/directed by their new Nato overlords.

But still the whole thing looks like a joke. There's literally dozen of migrants crossing the border with bicycles and Finnish media and politicians are frantically going defcon 5 like it's gravest situation our nation has ever faced!

At the EU parliament Finnish meps we're discussing these events to empty audience few days ago, as it must have looked too nothingburger for others to even participate, I think. At some places in Europe, such as Lambedusa island in Italy, there's been arriving thousands of migrants a single day, and compare that to the "hybrid operation" at the Finnish border.

The headline of Finnish MSM newspaper said: "EU parliament emptied as Finnish MP's started to talk about the eastern border - and this a good thing". See how delusional our media is, they try to turn this into a positive thing, by claiming that because no one was interested to hear Finnish MP's, it must mean that Putin's evil plan to sow discord is failing! :lol:

Finnish politicians rather shout "hybrid operation", than admit to the public that we're on a path of escalation by our own choice, which may not end well for Finland. Even though this particular case looks currently ridiculous the response of closing the border is serious in itself, and there's been active escalations done to make previous relationship with Russia impossible.

Besides the sanctions, sending weapons to Ukraine, bullying Russian citizens, ending economic ties and joining Nato, Finland expelled nine Russian diplomats last summer, which led to the closure of Finland's main consulate in St.Petersburg.

Deterioration of diplomatic channels is not a good sign, and there seems to be other similar plans on table, such as closing the Russian consulate in Åland, (ending demilitarization itself in there is legally extremely difficult with several historical agreements in place) as this seems to be a step they would like to achieve. Although some Finnish foreign ministry officials are hesitating about this, there is presidental elections coming next year, and we can hear from several candidate's words how this would be a desirable goal, and the media has also been pushing this angle for a while now.
 
🇸🇪 Sweden
High treason / coup d'état ?

When i heard the (alternative) news the other day, it was as if my breakfast got stuck in my throat.

So, the Swedish foreign minister Pål Jonsson travels to the US a couple days ago, signing a treaty/agreement with the US foreign minister -

🔸that the US military can access 17 military bases in the Kingdom of Sweden unrestricted.

🔸The US can store weapons unrestricted on Swedish soil. Even atomic weapons - which is forbidden. Though right now, the “US has no need to store nuclear weapons on Swedish soil”. [Yeah. Words. Not even worth a penny]

🔸US military staff located in Sweden is ruled by American military law, not Swedish.

- All this without the Swedish Parliament doscussion / agreement /vote (so far)

- no laws have been changed (yet) as the current ones do NOT allow this what so ever

- without prior information to the Swedish citizens about that a FOREIGN power will have free unrestricted access to all Swedish military facilities (and secrets).

- And we are NOT in NATO yet, either


I consider this to be High Treason !
The worst act possible against a sovereign (and officially still neutral) nation (for 200+ years). It literally went unnoticed for most people here in Sweden.

Just like that ?!?

Simply unthinkable that a foreign power gets all of the sudden, unrestricted access to all military installations here in Sweden plus that US laws are applied instead of Swedish laws. In practice, this means all US staff enjoys a kind of immunity when they misbehave in private.

Apparently our current foreign minister Pål Jonsson has very deep ties to the US, for a long time. Another traitor groomed and infiltrated. Like so many others we have seen in the past in other countries.

😡
 
consider this to be High Treason !
The worst act possible against a sovereign (and officially still neutral) nation (for 200+ years). It literally went unnoticed for most people here in Sweden.
Yeah, I saw the news today. Although expected, it is still astonishing how far things have progressed in a short time, and how Finland and Sweden are so eagerly showing their servitude and compliance to their "new" overlords, without any thought or instict of self preservation. Finland is going to sign their defence cooperation agreement in 18th of December, and according to Minister of Defence Häkkänen, it'll be mostly identical in terms, so likely allowing US military laws to be similarly applied in here, unrestricted store of weapons, and creation of several military bases etc.
 
Simply unthinkable that a foreign power gets all of the sudden, unrestricted access to all military installations here in Sweden plus that US laws are applied instead of Swedish laws. In practice, this means all US staff enjoys a kind of immunity when they misbehave in private.
It is similar direction in Denmark, at least as far as US laws to be applied.

Sputnik has
Finland to Give US Access to 15 Military Bases
8 hours ago
Estonian PM Kaja Kallas, Finland's President Sauli Niinisto and France's Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna at the NATO Summit in Vilnius on July 12, 2023.  - Sputnik International, 1920, 14.12.2023

© AFP 2023 / Odd Andersen
Subscribe

HELSINKI (Sputnik) - Finland will give the United States access to 15 of its military bases under a defense cooperation pact, Finnish Defense Minister Antti Hakkanen announced Thursday.
Next week, the US and Finland are expected to sign the Defence Cooperation Agreement in Washington. Finnish daily Helsingin Sanomat reported that the bases would host US ground forces, navy and air force personnel.
The Finnish cabinet clarified that the agreement will be signed on December 18. Afterward, it would have to be approved by the parliament.

"The United States is committed to protecting us during hard times. This is an extremely important message now," Hakkanen said during a televised news conference.



The agreement will provide the US with the access to and use of "the agreed facilities and areas; prepositioning of defence equipment, supplies and materiel in the territory of Finland; entry and movement of US aircraft, vessels and vehicles; ensuring the protection, safety, and security of US forces and the facilities and areas they use; criminal jurisdiction; and diverse practical matters related to the activities of US forces in the territory of Finland," the cabinet said in a statement.

The US has also signed similar deals with Norway (full NATO member) and Sweden (potential future NATO member), providing the country with access to four and 17 new bases in the Nordic region, respectively.

On April 4, 2023, Finland officially joined NATO, thus bringing to an end the nation's decades of non-alignment policy. With the country's accession to the alliance, the bloc's border has gained nearly 1,300 kilometers along the Russian-Finnish border.


Russian officials have expressed major concern regarding unprecedented NATO activity on the country's western border under the pretext of "deterrence." Moscow has repeatedly raised concerns about the alliance's military buildup in Europe. The Kremlin has emphasized that Russia "poses no threat to anyone, but will not ignore actions potentially harmful to its interests."

Finland, along with Sweden, submitted their membership applications in mere months after Russia launched its special military operation in Ukraine. Sweden's application is still pending ratification by Hungary and Turkiye.
Is the future of Europe that of Argentina?
Putin hits out at new Argentine president’s dollarization plan
Adopting the US currency would lead to a “significant” loss of sovereignty, the Russian leader has warned
And before getting to the USD, make everything dirt cheap for US capital investment:
Argentina to Halve Exchange Rate of National Currency to Fight Crisis - Economy Minister
BUENOS AIRES (Sputnik) - Argentine Finance Minister Luis Caputo said Tuesday that Argentine authorities went for a serious devaluation of the national currency and will halve the exchange rate of the national currency, the peso, against the US dollar to tackle the crisis in the country.
 
It is similar direction in Denmark, at least as far as US laws to be applied.
Below are more details and headlines from today and yesterday:
Defense agreement with the USA is one security policy protection. One detail shows who wants it the most
'There must not be as much as an A4 sheet between Denmark and the USA'
Irrevocable for 10 years: Agreement allows American soldiers on Danish soil

The defense agreement with the USA is security policy all-encompassing from Denmark – a detail shows who wants it the most
Analysis: If you have to look at who gets the most out of an agreement, you can look at whether it goes beyond the standard terms and in whose favor. And judging by the defense agreements the US has recently entered into with the Nordic countries, it is us who have the hat in hand.

It takes two parties to enter into an agreement, and the compromise must be palatable for both.

This also applies to the defense agreements the US enters into with the Nordic countries. The first was with Norway last year. In recent weeks, agreements with Sweden and Finland have fallen into place.

And today it was announced that the superpower and Denmark have finally come to an end with the negotiations, which have been going on since just before Russia entered Ukraine.
[...]

And from Jyllands-Posten
9/12/2023 AT 12:45 p.m
Expert on defense cooperation with the USA: Denmark has gone further than during the Cold War – and this will create a reaction from the Russians

The Americans have a clear agenda with the agreement, which gives access to Danish airforce stations, explains Peter Viggo Jakobsen.

The new defense cooperation with the USA 'marks a new breakthrough in Danish defense policy', explained Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen (S) at a press conference on Tuesday afternoon.

Here she and Minister of Defense Troels Lund Poulsen (V) announced the agreement which, among other things, means that American soldiers and equipment can be stationed at the air stations in Karup, Skrydstrup and Aalborg.

'It is absolutely correct that this is a new marriage. We have agreed to something we did not want during the Cold War. It is of course about the war in Ukraine, but it probably would have come anyway because the Americans have such a great interest in this collaboration,' says Peter Viggo Jakobsen, associate professor at the Norwegian Defense Academy.
But from Arbejderen.dk there is an article that explains not all agree:
The Danish Defense Committee warned against foreign troops on Danish soil
Activists from the Peace Initiative were represented in the Danish Parliament's Defense Committee. Here they warned the parties' defense representatives about the consequences of giving the green light to the establishment of American bases on Danish territory.
It was not green youth that argued:
1702992084869.png
Tove Jensen (left) and Birgit Sørensen (right) from the Peace Initiative on their way to a meeting with the Danish Parliament's Defense Committee, where the two peace activists warned against opening up American military bases on Danish soil.

ML@ARBEJDEREN.DK
18 DECEMBER 2023 | 06:06
On Thursday afternoon, two peace activists from the Peace Initiative's base campaign 'No to USA bases' were represented in the Danish Parliament's Defense Committee.

Here they warned the parties' defense representatives about the consequences of giving the green light to the establishment of American bases on Danish territory.

- The Danish government is currently negotiating with the USA about an agreement that opens up American bases and the permanent stationing of American troops on Danish soil, says Birgit Sørensen, active in the Peace Initiative.

With her was Tove Jensen, who is also active in the Peace Initiative.

- The negotiations and plans for an American military base in Denmark create great insecurity in the parts of the Danish public who are familiar with the impending agreement. We want transparency and want to know the reasons for Denmark's need to enter into such an agreement with the world's biggest war machine, the USA. Such an agreement will mean that Denmark joins the US's base empire, and opens Denmark up to foreign troops, warns Tove Jensen.
Next, there are more notes from the news coverage of the event that announced the agreement. There will be some repetition, but considering the importance of the day, I think it is okay.
LIVE: American soldiers can be stationed in Denmark with a new agreement
The USA is in full swing entering into defense cooperation with the Nordic countries.
TODAY AT 13:57

Overview: This means the agreement with the United States
The USA can station American soldiers and store material on Danish soil.
Concretely, the soldiers can be stationed at three Danish air stations: Skrydstrup, Karup and Aalborg.
The government cannot answer how many American soldiers are expected in Denmark. But they will be evident in the streets, and you will meet them in Brugsen supermarket, says the Prime Minister.
The agreement is scheduled to enter into force in one year's time.
It is irrevocable for ten years. So even if Denmark wants to get rid of the American soldiers in five years, it cannot be done.
The USA will not be able to place cluster bombs or nuclear weapons in Denmark.
Greenland and the Faroe Islands are not covered by the agreement.
If an American soldier commits a crime in Denmark, it will be the American authorities who must prosecute him - not the Danish ones.
Expert: New agreement makes Nato stronger
NATO stands stronger against Russia with the defense agreements that the US has entered into with countries such as Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark.

This is according to Sten Rynning, professor of war studies and director of the Danish Institute for Advanced Studies at the University of Southern Denmark.

- It is the point of the agreements that NATO and not least the USA must have easier access to bring troops right up to the immediate area close to Russia, so that the Russians cannot attack into NATO territory without expecting strong resistance.

It closes, so to speak, a gap in NATO's ability to deter an attack from Russia.

Because if you don't want to deter the Russians with nuclear weapons, you have to use something else, he says.

- It is conventional forces that can roll all the way to the border and ensure that the Russians do not roll forward. It requires an enormous amount of logistics and a great deal of muscle power to lift troops from west to east under NATO auspices.

- Denmark is just on the main road towards the Baltic countries, and that is what this agreement is about. The Americans will use the three air stations to move troops close to NATO's border.
A voice of protest, just one:
Enhedslisten: This is completely unheard of
The new defense agreement between Denmark and the USA causes great concern in the Enhedslisten.

Foreign affairs rapporteur Trine Perthou Mach calls it 'incredibly worrying'.

- It is incredibly worrying to give up sovereignty in this way to a foreign power, which must now have soldiers stationed on Danish territory, but where it is regulated by the USA and not by the Danish authorities.

But the defense minister says there is full control over what the Americans are doing. So what is there to worry about?

- I haven't read the agreement closely yet, but part of the discussion in the other Nordic countries is whether Danish authorities can have inspection rights. Can we investigate whether the Americans are complying with the agreements? Can we be sure there are no nuclear and cluster weapons? That interrogations are not carried out with torture? What happens if an American commits something criminal in Denmark - and why aren't Danish authorities supposed to investigate it?, she says.

In particular, the legal situation if an American soldier commits a crime in Denmark is worrying.

- If a Danish woman is raped and the main suspect is an American, it will not be the Danish authorities who have to investigate it. It must then be American authorities according to American law. It is completely unheard of, she says.
To counter the protest from the left and green party, Enhedslisten. If you asked the Danes who they prefer to be occupied by, the US or Russia, 94 % would, at a guess, say the US. Well, now they have their wish fulfilled, though it will take time before the agreement is ironed out with changes to current Danish/EU legislation.

The liberal left party, De Radikale, are slightly worried, but not really:
Radicals: Two things give cause for concern
The Radicals support the defense agreement the government has entered into with the United States.

This is according to Foreign Minister Christian Friis Bach, who calls the agreement necessary and important.

But even so, he has concerns about the agreement on a principled level:

- There are two things where there is cause for concern. One is the weapons we don't want: cluster bombs and nuclear weapons.
But how will they control that none of those weapons will be stored, well it is also his main concern:
- The second is crime committed by American soldiers on Danish soil. We want them to be prosecuted in Denmark. We hope the Americans will allow that, he says.

The government made it clear at a press conference earlier today that the agreement does not allow the Americans to store either nuclear weapons or cluster bombs in Denmark.

The agreement means that American soldiers who commit crimes on Danish soil must basically be prosecuted in the USA. And that is what Christian Friis Bach is worried about.

- The Americans have a rule of law and a strong legal system. They can prosecute their own citizens and that is what they want.

- But we want the citizens who commit crimes here to be punished here. We hope the Americans will make it possible, and we must push for that, he says.
TODAY AT 12:29 p.m
Expert: Russia will be angry - but mostly at other Nordic countries
The Russians will be angry about the new defense agreement between the USA and Denmark, says Peter Viggo Jakobsen, associate professor at the Defense Academy.

But it is not the Danish agreement that will excite the Russians the most, he estimates.

- What especially scares them is that the Americans will now have access to Finland. This brings the US very close to the Russian nuclear submarines and warships that can carry nuclear weapons, and which are supposed to deter the Americans from attacking Russia with nuclear weapons.

- So the closer you get to the Russian border, the angrier the Russians get. After all, we are in the middle of nowhere, so it will be the other Nordic countries that take most of the grumbling from Russia, he says.
He is right about Russia, but also naive, or speaking against his better judgement when he says: "we are in the middle of nowhere", considering that the narrow Danish Straits are used for war ships of both countries. How is that in the middle of nowhere?!? On the other hand, if the deal has to be sold to the public, which it will come hell fire or high water, his statement is wise. Symbolically, however,
Iceland, which was part of Denmark until 1944, witnessed a significant vulcanic eruption last night and this morning.
Volcano erupts in Iceland after series of earthquakes | DW News
So much for hell fire, and there is an unusual and fresh warning out for high water in the seas around Denmark as a result of a storm. In short nothing to worry about. It is just like in a movie, as the guy from Island states regarding the eruption.
TODAY AT 12:18 p.m
Expert: The Americans will be able to send planes really, really quickly to Europe
The US has now entered into defense agreements with a number of European countries. Now also Denmark.

Many of the agreements give the Americans access to air stations, and there is a reason for that, assesses Peter Viggo Jakobsen, associate professor at the Defense Academy.

- The USA is in the process of making itself capable of being able to send planes really, really quickly to Europe in a war situation in order to deter a Russian attack on a NATO country.

- It is necessary to have many different air stations for that. With the missile threat, you make a nice target for the Russians if you have many planes gathered at one base.

- When you can spread your planes over almost all NATO countries, the Russians don't really have anything to shoot at, he says.
TODAY AT 12:00
Troels Lund Poulsen: It will not be a mini-USA
Although the Americans will now have the opportunity to station soldiers and store material at three Danish air stations, there will be no question of the air stations becoming American in practice.

Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen emphasizes this.

- We are not creating a mini-USA. It is a cooperation agreement in which the Americans comply with our international obligations. But having said that, the Americans must have the opportunity to store material to the extent that they think it makes sense.
TODAY AT 11:55
What does Denmark get out of it?
The US will therefore be able to station soldiers in Denmark and store equipment at three Danish air stations.

But what does Denmark get out of the agreement?

This gives defense correspondent Mads Korsager a suggestion for:

- The advantages for Denmark are – roughly speaking – that the better relations we have with the USA, the safer Denmark is. Denmark is not a strong military power, but if we follow in the wake of the USA, then Denmark will become a safer place, because the USA is the world's strongest military power.

- By virtue of that friendship alone, it is a strengthening of Danish security, he says.
TODAY AT 11:50
Defense correspondent: I paid attention to that
DR's defense correspondent, Mads Korsager, followed the entire press conference.

He is particularly adamant that it is three named air stations that will form the framework for defense cooperation.

The USA will be able to station soldiers and place equipment at the three air stations.

- It actually makes good sense. All the airfields are large geographically, there is plenty of space to establish an American presence, and they are also fairly well guarded, says Mads Korsager.
TODAY AT 11:39
The agreement is valid for ten years - no matter what
The agreement must first be completely in place here in Denmark before it comes into force.

Among other things, some legislation must be changed, and therefore part of it must go through the parliament first.

The government therefore expects the agreement to come into force in a year's time, says the Minister of Defence.

And then it will apply for ten years. No matter what. The agreement is irrevocable for the first ten years.

So even if, in a few years, the Danish government wishes to send American soldiers home, it cannot be done.

- We are looking at a very tense situation in our immediate area. Therefore, I think we should be happy about this agreement, which also extends forward, says Troels Lund Poulsen.
And who created "the very tense situation in our immediate area"? The US will give you the "correct answer", no doubt.
TODAY AT 11:35
Who should prosecute US soldiers?
One of the major discussions in other countries where the United States has entered into similar defense agreements is who should prosecute American soldiers if they commit crimes.

For example, in Germany there has been a situation where an American soldier had killed a German. He is being tried by a court-martial in the United States instead of a German court.

And as a starting point, it will also be like this that the Americans prosecute themselves, says Mette Frederiksen:

- It will basically be the case that the Americans themselves can prosecute if something were to happen. Unless Denmark in a concrete situation considers that we want it differently, says Mette Frederiksen.
TODAY AT 11:32
The Danes will meet American soldiers in Brugsen [Brugsen is a common supermarket chain]
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen will not put a concrete number on how many American soldiers can come to Denmark, because it depends on the situation.

But it becomes clear that they are going to be here:

- You will get to see American soldiers on Danish soil, and you will also be able to hear that when you shop in Brugsen, says the Prime Minister.

- It will change the streetscape, the places where they will be. And we are looking forward to that, it says.
TODAY AT 11:28
No cluster bombs or nukes
The Minister of Defense says that one must continuously discuss with the United States what the American presence in Denmark should look like.

But all activities must take place in coordination with the Danish defense and with respect for Danish sovereignty and legislation.

- The same applies in relation to the storage of certain types of weapons, which of course must respect Denmark's obligations under international law.

- It is relevant in relation to, for example, cluster bombs. And nothing changes Danish policy on storing nuclear weapons on Danish territory, says Troels Lund Poulsen.
There is a precedence in Denmark when it comes to US to say no officially, and allow it unofficially. If it comes out, it will be said that it was in just a transit to Poland or similar.
In another article published yesterday, there was:
Finland allows American soldiers to come very close to the border with Russia
The new agreement gives the US military unhindered access to a number of military areas and buildings in countries close to Russia.
By
Rasmus Christiansen
YESTERDAY AT 09:23
Several countries close to Russia, both before and after the invasion of Ukraine, have given the green light for American soldiers to be stationed in their countries. And today a new country joins the list.

Because today an agreement on greater defense cooperation between the USA and Finland is being officially signed.

This allows American forces to get very close to the border with Russia.

Today, the agreement will be formally signed, after which it must be officially approved by the legislatures of the two countries.
1702999372409.png
- The agreement makes cooperation and operations easier and faster to organize in peacetime. It will also be vital in times of crisis, Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen said last week when the agreement was announced.

Included in the agreement is a list of 15 facilities and areas to which the US military will have unfettered access and which it can use to store military equipment and ammunition.

These include four air stations, a military port, and access via rail to northern Finland, where the US military can use an area for storage.

An area that is a few hours' drive from the border with Russia, writes the Reuters news agency.

Agreement also concluded with Sweden
Finland, which became a NATO member earlier this year, is far from the only country to have entered into such an agreement with the United States.

On December 6, Sweden entered into a similar agreement.

The agreement gives US forces access to 17 areas and facilities, including four air stations, a port and five military bases.

Unlike Finland, however, Sweden is still waiting for them to be approved as a NATO member.

In addition, the United States has made similar agreements with Norway, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Estonia.

The Danish government is also in the process of negotiating a similar cooperation with the USA.

Will not store nuclear weapons
The American presence in Finland can be made permanent, but there are currently no plans for that, the Finnish government says.

The agreement states that Finland will not allow nuclear weapons, biological weapons or anti-personnel mines - a type of mine designed to kill or maim people - to be stored or transported on Finnish territory.

According to Reuters, Finland is also in the process of improving its railway infrastructure around the border with Sweden, which should make it easier for the countries' allies to send forces and equipment to cities that are close to the border with Russia.

The Russian government has repeatedly criticized Finland's NATO membership and warned that it risks escalating the conflict further.

President Putin echoed that criticism in an interview with Russian state television that aired Sunday.

- The West has taken Finland and drawn them into Nato. Why? We solved all the problems we had with Finland a long time ago. There were no problems, but there will be now, Putin said.
The above agreements prepares the US to protect its interests in Europe, in case of a collapse of NATO. If NATO is broken, it will allow for Ukraine style proxy engagements, without committing to article 5 and involve a greater area than the US can afford. Moreover, if Russia/Ukraine is no longer an issue, it will allow for conflict in Western Europe itself.

The new agreements with Sweden, Finland and Denmark mark a development, but then, at least in the case of Denmark, the government has been more than willing to take initiatives on Ukraine in the direction of more war and less peace, with rather few people protesting both the military aid and the massive funding, all made at the expense of the local citizens. It can be concluded that all is as it should be in a country Shakespeare's play Hamlet brought to notice, even if it is hard to rejoice when people accept manipulation and lies.

It is worth noting that Kaliningrad is now practically encircled, while the access to the Russian city of Saint Petersburg, is in a dormant siege from the side of the Baltic sea, that can be activated any time. This was also signaled by the bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline that followed the first wargames with US military presence on the Island of Bornholm in 2022, thus breaking an agreement made with the Soviet Union, about not having US soldiers on that island. The US and Denmark broke the spirit of the agreement, but held onto the claim they did not break its letter, since the Soviet Union no longer exists. I guess that is how snakes perpetuate what they call peace.
 
Well, when I think about this, isn't it very convinient now, if a "swan flue" or "camel hump syphilis" comes to anywhere in Scandinavia with bird migration, WHOever cares about us, has troops here to give medicine or arrange shelters where needed.... And they take orders from and are responsible to no-one, expect to the evil genious at the top of the pyramid.

Arrgh, how much more human masses need before they start seeing these lies? And what must happen before 4th dimension borns? I think suffering to some extent does put us thinking, but extreme suffering and violence only give birth for new wars. Or is that what they want, total destruction?

Well, at least here's one thing again to talk to people and try to get them understand that we are (almost) all Humans, who have same rights to live here. Back to 60's, make Love not war.
 
Thanks for sharing all those details, @thorbiorn, @Seppo Ilmarinen and @XPan. Geez, Scandinavia was already a US pawn, but they are getting into it even deeper now, disregarding their own interestests. Russia may not take this well at all, indeed, and it's sad, because being so close, THEY should be partners. But nope, "they" can't allow that.

It's "funny" how the EU doesn't really matter here. You'd think they would need to consult with the other members if they are basically welcoming foreign armies into their countries, but since it's the US, they can forgo that "detail"?

I reckon it doesn't bode well for neither Scandinavia, nor Europe in general. It could just be fake scare tactics, though. We'll see.
 
Sweden accepts nuclear weapons

Well, Sweden already signed an agreement (or was it a declaration ?!) several years ago, in which they stated to accept nuclear weapons can be stored on Swedish soil. No other Scandinavian country accepts that (officially) on their territories - except the stupid Swedes, do. (I wonder if the average Sweden even is aware of this total change in attitude revolving nuclear weapons getting stationed in Sweden).

There was however, no discussion about it.

Neither about the latest, perhaps most serious change in Swedish History - the special agreement with the US Military, which must be seen as a silent coup d'état. No Flick is even taking about that - nor has this signed agreement been voted upon in favor in the Swedish Parliament (yet). It is truly an absurdity, which in my eyes simply underlines how much our "democracy" already has seen its last breathe.

Now, since the Swedish Minister for Defence, Pål Jonson (with deep Transatlantic ties) went to the US, signing a special agreement with the US military, which in hindsight reveals that it is the biggest significant decision made in Swedish history for the past 200 years.

He practically gives Sweden to the US military to their disposal - for what ever reason the US sees fit. They can do whatever they want militarily, whenever they want and with no insight into their motives and true military activities. Plus they are getting paid for everything with Swedish Taxpayers money. Staff doesn't need to pay tax, no need for passports, and there are no consequences that can touch them via Swedish laws. Nor do they need to account for their motives toward the Swedish Police, what US military individuals were doing. :umm:

It is an absurdly bad deal
in which the Kingdom of Sweden has absolutely no benefits from it. Since this is NOT a bilateral agreement - it does NOT guarantee that the US will protect Sweden in case of an attack. It also has nothing to do with NATO. It is a special single-sided agreement, to use Sweden as a transport matt for warfare - solely based on the US military's thinking, strategies and wishes. Without any true influence the Swedish Gov or Swedish Military can do. Nothing in this agreement has to do about what is or would be good for Sweden.

Plus that Sweden, even in this agreement, is not rejecting the storage of nuclear weapons on Swedish soil.

Denmark, Finland and Norway also have their special deals directly with the US Military, but with the difference that each country put in certain requirements and the (official) rejection of nuclear weapons.

(My guts tell me - I do not for a second believe that the US will not store nuclear weapons in Finland and Norway. When you have no true insight or power into the US Military activities, then you can't tell about possible storage of nuclear weapons either. And even if the involved Gov's would know... the US simply tell's them off. "No information" / "No comments". I believe that is much closer to reality)


Sweden: "People and defense 2024"
Apparently there was a conference under the label "People and defense 2024", in which the King of Sweden Carl-Gustav, Crown Princess Victoria and her husband Prince Daniel etc all were present. (Prince Daniel, who by the way, attend to WEF's Davos last year, if i got that right)

Possible war in Sweden. Clap-Clap-Clap.

Now guess who also was present (on air) at the same occasion ?

Zelensky. :barf:



Government warns of future war in Sweden

After the NATO application and the new "defence agreement" with the US - which really only benefits the US military and the globalist mafia's attempts to subjugate Russia - Sweden may be facing war. This has now been announced by the Swedish government.


It was during his speech at Folk och Försvar 2024 ("People and Defense 2024") that Carl-Oskar Bohlin, Minister for Civil Defence, thundered that there could be a war in Sweden.

Sweden has been at peace for over 200 years. But this "pleasant companion" can no longer be relied upon, according to the Minister. "It's dangerous to think that way.

- There could be a war in Sweden," he says bluntly.

Bohlin therefore calls for "societal resilience" among Swedes. 'And we must prepare ourselves mentally and practically for the possibility of war.

- Failure to act is not a permissible modus operandi.

Bohlin is addressing, among others, officials in emergency authorities and municipal councils, who should have their "war organisation" ready. As an employee, you should ask your employer what role you should play in the "workplace war organisation".

- Are you a private individual? Good, have you taken responsibility for your home preparedness? Have you thought about whether you have time to join a voluntary defence organisation? If not, go for it!" continues Carl-Oskar Bohlin.

According to the Minister, the world is facing "security policy developments with greater risks than since the end of the Second World War". We must stand by the "rules-based world order", he said.

The minister almost makes it sound like war is only a matter of time.

He admits that what he says in his speech "may sound dark and dystopian".

- For the vast majority of us, this is our only real home, the shard of land we want to leave to our future generations intact and better than we inherited it. Defending all this, our order, our freedoms and democratic ideals, is what it's all about and in this realisation we all need to grow in the seriousness of the task," he thunders.

On social media, not everyone is impressed by his speech, calling it "bullshit".

Listen to his speech HERE.


The warmongering of the People and Defence is so out of touch with reality that it has a "shadow of a lie" over it. So says former foreign affairs journalist Chris Forsne in Swebbtv.

- "Either an order has been issued from somewhere or everyone is just collectively hysterical right now, trying to build up fear.

It is in Swebbtv's latest Omvärldsanalys (What happens around us - Analysis) that the former SVT journalist, who has worked for many years on foreign affairs, comments on the Swedish government's sudden war hysteria.

She thinks that what is happening in Sweden is very strange.

Both the government and ÖB claim that Swedes must prepare for war.

The powers that be are trying to make the Swedes fearful and docile, and are portraying it as Russia planning a blitzkrieg against us. On the one hand, they have said that Sweden will be safer with NATO and the US, but now we are so insecure that we have to prepare for war.

- Gallimatias. This is pure nonsense, says Chris Forsne in Swebbtv. "I think everyone should just calm down and think about what we are doing.

The power elite is throwing out one insubstantial platitude after another.

- Either an order has been issued from somewhere or everyone is just collectively hysterical right now, trying to build up fear.

- Most of us who hear this are wondering what they are doing up there in People and Defence. There is an air of ridicule about the whole thing.

According to Forsne, this is about "a small closed group of people who socialise with each other and who have lost their footing and do not understand what is going on in the country".

- "Zelensky has become a continuation of the Greta phenomenon, which was almost as strong. Everyone was in favour of Greta and the earth would be finished and wiped out.

Rather, those in power are now themselves creating a threat to Sweden, a threat that would otherwise not have existed.

- "Unfortunately, this reminds me of the First World War and how the different sides fuelled the war," says Chris Forsne in Swebbtv.

"Why is nothing being done to negotiate peace in Ukraine instead?

- What are we doing?" Forsne asks.



Politicians and military officials are now claiming that Sweden is in a serious situation and that we may soon be at war.

This comes at a time when Ukraine is losing the war against Russia, Sweden is about to join NATO and the government is signing a "dangerous" military agreement with the US.

- Sweden should cancel the NATO application," Mikael Jansson (AFS) told Swebbtv News.

After the power elite led Swedes into an impending NATO membership and a misleading "defence agreement" with the US - which really only benefits the US military and the globalist mafia - Swedes should now be prepared for an upcoming war.

That was the government's message at Folk och försvar this weekend.

- 'There could be a war in Sweden,' said Carl-Oskar Bohlin (M), Minister for Civil Defence.

The power elite is trying to paint some kind of picture that Russia is interested in attacking Sweden, that it is only a matter of time before it blows up.

This comes after the total failure of the proxy war against Russia. According to military analyst Scott Ritter, the war is now lost, although the fighting will continue for some time. This is because Ukraine's strategic loss is a fact, which he says means that nothing in the future will change the outcome.

Swedes should imagine the same thing happening here as in Ukraine.

According to Commander-in-Chief Micael Bydén, Swedes must not give up hope, he said dramatically on TV4 Nyhetsmorgon on Monday.

- "Hope is not a strategy to build plans and take care of the problem, but hope must be there," says Micael Bydén on TV4. "It's not pitch black. But we have to understand how serious the situation really is and that people are mentally preparing themselves at an individual level. Look at the news reports from Ukraine. Ask yourself the simple questions. If it happens here, do I have things in place? What should I do?

According to Mr Bydén, it is important to have citizens who "understand now that this is serious". Because it could get worse for Sweden, he says on TV4, but he doesn't think Swedes should give up hope.

"But if we hadn't applied for NATO membership and invited the US war machine onto our soil, we wouldn't have had to think about war", writes a user on X.

"The US wants to keep its leading role in the world and we are the ones to be sacrificed", another user points out.

Some on social media don't even understand what the government and ÖB are talking about. What threat?

"Against what? Against who? And why?", writes one person on X.

The sudden drama from those in power may seem strange. But for the Western 'elite', the Ukraine war is about not losing global power, about maintaining 'world order'.

American journalist Tucker Carlson has previously said that he is absolutely convinced that the US power elite will go to war with Russia in 2024.

- They will do anything to win. So how will they do it? They won't do covid again. The right is afraid of that. But they won't. They can't do it. They have already been exposed. It won't work," explained Tucker Carlson in an interview last year. So what will they do? They will go to war with Russia. That's what they will do. There will be a real war between the US and Russia within the next year. I don't think we will win it. But that's a different analysis.



In this World Analysis, we once again meet former Ambassador Sven Hirdman,

who has previously participated in programmes on Swebbtv. In this programme, we hear his thoughts on the war and the possibility of peace in Ukraine, the military agreement between Sweden and the USA, and the situation in Gaza and how the land borders there should look for peace to be achieved.

Mr Hirdman says that he has followed Putin since 1995, when he was Deputy Mayor of St Petersburg. He later met him in Moscow when Mr Putin was working for the FSB (former KGB) and as Secretary of the Russian Security Council. When former Russian President Yeltsin announced that Vladimir Putin would become Prime Minister and was also intended to succeed Yeltsin, Mr Hirdman was surprised, he says. Hirdman saw Putin as a skilful civil servant but not a politician. There were other names that would have been more natural, he says.

Putin's first term of office, 2000-2004, was very successful with several successful reforms. However, the first worrying event occurred in 2003, Hirdman says, when Russia's richest man, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, was arrested and his oil company Yukos was confiscated. Russia's war with Georgia in 2008 and Putin's harsh words in 2007 that Russia would not submit to the United States were also signs that Putin had other plans for Russia than what the Western powers wanted.

Commenting on the military agreement signed between the US and Sweden, Mr Hirdman said: "This is an agreement that serves American military and strategic interests. It is not a bilateral agreement between the US and Sweden for the US to defend Sweden. There is no question of that!" Sweden previously had the so-called Host Nation Agreement with NATO, as well as the NATO application itself.

The new agreement is valid for ten years and cannot be cancelled during that time. With the expansion of NATO in recent decades, the location of a potential war zone has moved to the east and north. Scandinavia was not previously so central, but has now become so. Finland now has a 130-mile-long NATO border with Russia, and Sweden has become a staging area for US forces against Russia.

Mr Hirdman was also ambassador to Israel from 1983 to 1987. During that time the population of Gaza was about 600,000, compared to 2 million before the current conflict. At that time there was some possibility of living in Gaza through fishing and orange growing, unlike today. Mr Hirdman does not believe in a two-state solution with Gaza and the West Bank linked by a narrow corridor controlled by the PLO. There would inevitably be conflicts between Israeli settlers and Palestinians. The best solution would be to return to the 1967 borders and incorporate the Palestinians from Gaza into Jordan.
 
I forgot to add another little detail, after i listened to today's SwebbTV's discussion.

Sweden: "People and defense 2024"
Apparently there was a conference under the label "People and defense 2024", in which the King of Sweden Carl-Gustav, Crown Princess Victoria and her husband Prince Daniel etc all were present. (Prince Daniel, who by the way, attend to WEF's Davos last year, if i got that right)

That war mongering, 'Swedish' conference "People and Defense 2024"... was sponsored by BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION.

How far can irony go, before it becomes ridiculous ? :rolleyes: :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom