I find it fascinating that you seem to think that you have this all figured out. What happens when this 'woman' of yours doesn't follow these guidelines you've so brilliantly figured out?moonwalker said:These tests are a double edged sword if you respond the right way she will be noticeably more attracted to you after the test, but if you fail she will be noticeably less attracted.
Appeasement is futile, women are like children in this respect they have to know where the boundaries are. They will keep pushing and testing until they find those boundaries. When a women pushes and feels that resistance it allows her to feel secure with you. This is what she is looking for. But if she doesn't feel that resistance then she will keep pushing until she has walked all over you.
Of course she'll be unable to respect a man if she can walk all over him (the typical beta male). It will be mildly disappointing to her, but she'll also feel reassured about her feminine power. Women are reluctant to become emotionally invested with men of dubious intent or low value, a women knows once she becomes emotional it is far more difficult to extract herself from the situation.
Yes!!Anart said:You are also neglecting to consider what happens to this mechanical behavior you've described once a woman is no longer completely a machine?
Maybe I am misunderstanding something here, I don't have any knowledge of evolutionary psychology, but it seems to me that becoming less mechanical would make a person able to make choices/decisions/actions that are based on the knowledge of their true I, and not as children who need boundaries and security from outside sources.Moonwalker said:Appeasement is futile, women are like children in this respect they have to know where the boundaries are. They will keep pushing and testing until they find those boundaries. When a women pushes and feels that resistance it allows her to feel secure with you. This is what she is looking for. But if she doesn't feel that resistance then she will keep pushing until she has walked all over you.
That is because men most of the time abuse women, delegating them to do the "dirty work" (like rising children and cooking), while "they", men are created for some "higher purpose" (hunting, golf or making money). Our society, ruled by psychopaths, supports (unfortunately) this madness. My working hypothesis is that there is much more psychopaths among men than among women, but on this particular issue I am not aware of any rigorous research.moonwalker said:I mean how many women do you think are active on this forum, I'd be willing to bet not many, no where near as many as men anyway.