I have some strange thoughts for quite some time that I'd like to share, perhaps some of you have some feedback on this.
Thing is, most alternative media, and the (alternative) public discourse in general, have pretty much abandoned the 9/11 issue. Even Sott has shifted its focus. And there are of course many good reasons for this.
But some "shifts" that have been going on in the alternative media are a bit strange - I'm thinking about Paul Joseph Watson for example. Until Trump, he was busy exposing all kinds of geopolitical things, including Israeli involvement in ISIS/Syria and such, and of course he was part of the 9/11 truth movement, and he criticized Israel. Then suddenly, he abandoned many of these issues, became more part of the broader conservative camp and even adopted the conservatives' pro-Israel stance. Some people accuse him of being paid by a Jewish conspiracy or something, which I don't buy at all, but this shift is interesting. (BTW, I think PJW is brilliant and spot-on with many things.) Point is, he's a good example of how public discourse seems to have changed somewhat.
Now here's the thing: for quite some time, maybe even a few years, when I think back to 9/11 and even the period in my life where I was investigating this and reading about 9/11 truth and such, it all seems kind of foggy. Sometimes I ask myself: Did this really happen? What kind of world was that back then? It seems blurry, like another epoch, a different world.
Obviously 9/11 had a huge impact on the world we find ourselves in now. But could there have been a timeline split somewhere along the way? Russia's involvement in Syria seems like a good candidate, which basically changed the whole "post-9/11 setup". In hindsight, this seems to be the point where so many things started changing and shifting. But with the discussion about merging timelines from the recent session, I ask myself - could it also be that we are kind of attracting a different, alternative timeline - maybe one where 9/11 didn't even happen? Or where things went another way? Again, it's just this strange feeling, this "blurriness" of the post-9/11 epoch.
So, perhaps something positive is happening here, but then again, perhaps STS are changing and shifting narratives to derail us. Or it's all in my head and what I perceive is just a reflection of my personal journey over the last decade or so. Or it's a combination of all these things. Don't know, but since I keep thinking about this, I thought I'd share.
Any thoughts?
Thing is, most alternative media, and the (alternative) public discourse in general, have pretty much abandoned the 9/11 issue. Even Sott has shifted its focus. And there are of course many good reasons for this.
But some "shifts" that have been going on in the alternative media are a bit strange - I'm thinking about Paul Joseph Watson for example. Until Trump, he was busy exposing all kinds of geopolitical things, including Israeli involvement in ISIS/Syria and such, and of course he was part of the 9/11 truth movement, and he criticized Israel. Then suddenly, he abandoned many of these issues, became more part of the broader conservative camp and even adopted the conservatives' pro-Israel stance. Some people accuse him of being paid by a Jewish conspiracy or something, which I don't buy at all, but this shift is interesting. (BTW, I think PJW is brilliant and spot-on with many things.) Point is, he's a good example of how public discourse seems to have changed somewhat.
Now here's the thing: for quite some time, maybe even a few years, when I think back to 9/11 and even the period in my life where I was investigating this and reading about 9/11 truth and such, it all seems kind of foggy. Sometimes I ask myself: Did this really happen? What kind of world was that back then? It seems blurry, like another epoch, a different world.
Obviously 9/11 had a huge impact on the world we find ourselves in now. But could there have been a timeline split somewhere along the way? Russia's involvement in Syria seems like a good candidate, which basically changed the whole "post-9/11 setup". In hindsight, this seems to be the point where so many things started changing and shifting. But with the discussion about merging timelines from the recent session, I ask myself - could it also be that we are kind of attracting a different, alternative timeline - maybe one where 9/11 didn't even happen? Or where things went another way? Again, it's just this strange feeling, this "blurriness" of the post-9/11 epoch.
So, perhaps something positive is happening here, but then again, perhaps STS are changing and shifting narratives to derail us. Or it's all in my head and what I perceive is just a reflection of my personal journey over the last decade or so. Or it's a combination of all these things. Don't know, but since I keep thinking about this, I thought I'd share.
Any thoughts?