I find this quite perceptive!
Brazil doesn’t seem to be the type of country at the moment to take such a proactive stance - but China certainly seems to be.
About Musk’s level of autonomy… to me, my guess is very little. If I has to guess a percentage, I’d say 80-90% consciously or unconsciously controlled, given what I mentioned before.
Now, to untangle threads. Here’s a few groups I see in play.
In US: 1) Aryan Imperialists (which I’m synoniming to ‘nazis’) 2) Jews 3) Globalists. Each will claim that we are America [sic]. “Using taxpayer money… national interest” - Mike Benz. “What’s good for the jews is is good for America[sic]” - a journalist on The Atlantic , if I remember the outlet correctly. And 3’s Claiming Biden’s office is the will of the people. They will all try to steal credit for the other group’s stealing, when they can.
They overlap more often than not, but we are seeing a more clear-cut fight between 1(+2) vs 3 in North Atlantis, such as with Trump, Órban, Bolsonaro.
In some cases, 1 is fighting 2, such as Ron Unz, whose columnists at this point are explicitly calling themselves nazis (“excuse me, the correct term is national-socialist” quipped one) and barely talk about anything else other than 2.
1, 2 and 3 may fight in-house and diverge on issues such as how to deal with Russia, but they have practically the same policy towards S America in general: pillage.
It would also seem that they diverge on how to pillage. 2 and 3 either preferring or not being able to help but doing it through severe chaos and brute violence, while 1 in general follows Kissinger’s approach (see Chatham house speech) of maintaining the target victim relatively stable and leeching its resources through more elaborate means, such as privatization.
Also, B’s adm was so intensely chaotic it may have simply reached a point it’s unhelpful. 2 and 3 realized this and planned to put an adult in power. They must feel flustered that 1 ‘doesn’t get it’, and maybe by sheer ideological resonance keep supporting B even if he’s actually unhelpful in plans of plunder.
Also, it seems N Atlantis’ 1 is “making it personal”, and taking their fight with 2-3 in the countries where they get (steal) their bacon from, like a hysterical divorcing wife making a scene at her divorcing husband’s office. The wife may be very greedy and want the husband to make a lot of money so she can get a fat alimony, but she can’t help herself and just breaks loose.
I suppose the CIA, whose revenue is said to be larger than most country’s GDP and has - how many was it? - thousands and thousands of workers, and is significantly internally compartmentalized, is a really messy mish-mash of interests of 1, 2 and 3. So maybe the CIA is in-fighting about Brazil. So players would be:
In Brazil:
1) The sovereign-oriented oligarchs: Pedro II, Brazil’s second and last emperor who sat in the throne for 48 years 1841-1889, seems to have opened a precedent for serious sovereignty and local power.
So some oligarchs learned and developed from that period a significant sense of autonomy. And these people’s actions can be seen in for example getting Lula and his party elected and maintained in power from 2002-2016, when Brazil’s nominal GDP was about reach France’s - and then N Atlantis’ 1, 2 and 3 did what they did.
2) The legs-spread-wide oligarchs: Of course, since Brazil was bred to be a submissive colony and symbolically raped by her father Portugal systematically, she developed a “personality” that you could call promiscuous - little sovereignty -, so there’s that current of slutty traitors as well.
They’re the ones who basically trade lives for pennies to foreigners, and their job is full-time traitors. Bolsonaro’s severe hysterical behavior, and especially his second and most influential son’s flamboyant manipulation schemes which are typically feminine (likely homosexual, in his case), I’m fairly confident he’s either a member of of this group or represents them very well.
3) CIA: someone just told me that there’s a book called 1964 (year of the military coup). In the book it’s stated that at that time the US had 500.000 agents (conscious or unconscious) in Brazil.
By seeing what happened in 2016, personal anecdotes from myself and others, my guess is that this number has only increased. After the latest big coup (impeachment), CNN itself opened a branch here in Paulista Avenue (the most iconic avenue in the richest city in the country), and very quickly became one of the main media outlets here. I haven’t heard a single person say a pip about such a blatant conspiration.
4) China: Brazil’s biggest trade partner, significantly more so than US. People who have dealt with them told me “they have no end for their money”. Told me of companies they gave millions and million to, even a hundred million (was it USD or BRL) - it never gave any profit, the directors became rich, and the Chinese just said “that’s fine, it was just an experiment”.
Decades ago they were sending their scientists to blatantly scan and plagiarize material from libraries and scientific papers. Give almost 0 contribution. Go back to China. Disappear.
Also, they were very likely behind Argentina’s world cup title. At least 2 Chinese companies were sponsoring the team. The team won against France with Macron in the stadium. Almost lost just like Brazil lost. In the tiebreaking freekicks, didn’t take away the best penalty kicker in the world (like Br did) and didn’t list their least experienced players to kick-off and define a world champion (like Brazil did).
China is in strategic sectors in Br and Arg, such as nuclear power, mines, electrical energy, etc.
5) Russia: in 1964 a legal communist revolution almost happened. There was going to be agrarian reform, and there was even proposals of giving the vacant homes to the homeless (though this one is seen as a “scarecrow” to get other less radical reforms passed). It is said that the Russians warned then president Dilma in 2016 that her presidential plane was tapped. They’ve been here for quite a long time, and they’re far, far more discrete than the N Antlantics.
The agendas and a sort of time-line:
My guess is that:
• the sov-olig had plans for being a near-superpower in the planet (2002-2016 adm). China becomes #1 trade partner.
• N Atlantis (1, 2 and 3) had other plans - 2016 coup.
• Sov-olig plays nice, steps back. China remains trade partner.
• Germany’s 7x1 in football against Brazil. World FIFA wanting to arrest Brazilian’s national FIFA president. Severe demoralization.
• Traitor-olig becomes emboldened. Imprison sov-olig’s main man Lula (2018-2019). Sov-oligs just watch - and prepare. China clout only increases.
• NA’s 2 and 3 became exasperated with B’s cartoonish adm - too chaotic to plunder properly. “Get’em out!”.
• COVID circus breaks, probably used also with intention to demoralize “populists” around the globe. Has opposite effect.
• NA 2 and 3 agree to stabilize Br for now. Sov oligs agree. NA1 disagrees and allies with traitor-oligs (can’t resist a chance to “win” against wife/gay husband).
• Sov-oligs, NA2 and 3 manage to get Lula elected through legal and illegal means.
• Ru-Ukr war starts. Russia shows to be a superpower. Lula and sov-oligs have a lot of room for maneuver - nothing like playing “who’s the biggest bid?” as an almost irresistible woman with 2-3 superpowers wanting your attractive physical trasures.
• Lula realizes he’s old and has little left to lose, so plays a reverse card on 2 and 3, bets on China and Russia, sov-oligs.
• 2 and 3 approaching collapse - 32T USD debt on their main organ, “global majority” wising up and being empowered by Eurasia. Can’t afford to punish back at the juicy lady - need the juice or die.
• NA1 still can’t read the room. Too busy thinking they’re going to save humanity, to exact revenge and trying soothe hysterical fits. 3-5 year old’s level of ability to cope with failure. Starts pumping resource into manifesting destiny in Brazil.
• Sov-oligs are happy to use 2 and 3 apparatus (CIA or otherwise) to shut up the traitor-oligs, fight back NA1’s coup and create stability, gain power.
• NA1 unflatteringly explicitly calls for coup through many different players.
• Musk, who’s unsure whether he works for NA1, 2 or 3, dislikes sov-oligs move. He wants to coup whoever he wants, and local kleptocrats object!
• NA2 and 3 busy coup-ing US from NA1. Sov-oligs have enough clout as it is to mostly carry out their plan.
• Lula breaks the news that that NA2 is a whole lot like NA1 (comment that Israel = Hitler), removes them from strategic intel and military position. Read: -flick- off. Tells N3 that he’ll make the country very ‘hard to catch’ (to Macron: “I never felt so much like fighting”. To King Charles: “we need a looot of money to save Amazon”).
•N3 concedes and sends Macron to hug indians and dish out 2B euros.
• Brazil’s pop remain enormously hysterical with around half praying to tiers, doing nazi salutes, signalling ET’s for help, begging to be f’d by a big daddy with guns. The other half is slightly less hysterical, voting more based on how much food they had during a man’s term instead of what their pathological zionist pastor tells them. Still supporting Biden thinking he is a “left” candidate, lovin’em trannies and gays and being way smarter than those conspiracy theorists that say jews can be mean, or that the WHO wasn’t entirely transparent during the COVID crisis.
That’s the best I can see at the moment.
Last edited: