Where can I read the article you mentioned, since the Google ads are sitting write on top of part of the text? Very annoying. Can you send the article to my email address, perhaps?E said:We don't infringe on people's free will.
djewlew said:Where can I read the article you mentioned, since the Google ads are sitting write on top of part of the text? Very annoying. Can you send the article to my email address, perhaps?E said:We don't infringe on people's free will.
Free Will
The question of free will has many levels. At the level of the universe, we could say that the only reason why anything exists is free will. The creative will of the All mediates between the thought centers of being and non-being, creating a dance of all possible forms.
As the initial impulse of creative will descends from the unconditioned realms of creation towards materiality, it gets diluted, more mechanical and determined at each level.
Tradition, as transmitted by Gurdjieff and Mouravieff, even as reflected in the Bible, suggests that the logos or creative will of the Absolute is the impulse behind all which is. The Cassiopaeans and Ra define free will as the first universal principle.
Strict determinists are the only ones who completely deny free will.
The concept of free will becomes much more ambiguous when applied at the human level. We could postulate that anything with some degree of consciousness somehow retains some spark of the uncreated, primordial free will. If this were not so, we could not define concepts of responsibility, which after all are central to any ethics. For this reason, pretty much all religious systems recognize some degree of free will, no matter how they otherwise may tend to restrict this.
Gurdjieff's description of the default state of man is nearly behavioristic, involving next to no free will. Still, Gurdjieff's whole work strives towards opening a window through which this free will might manifest. In this sense, Gurdjieff is diametrically and fundamentally opposed to any deterministic school of thought.
The greatest problem for manifested free will at the human level is that man is not one: One I wills, another does not, a third is not even aware of the whole question.
In Life Is Only Real Then When I Am, Gurdjieff introduces the dictum 'I Am, I Can, I Wish.' From the book:
'Only such a man, when he consciously says "I am"-he really is; "I can"-he really can; "I wish"-he really wishes. When "I wish"-I feel with my whole being that I wish, and can wish. This does not mean that I want, that I need, that I like or, lastly, that I desire. No. "I wish." I never like, never want, I do not desire anything and I do not need anything-all this is slavery; if "I wish" something, I must like it, even if I do not like it. I can wish to like it, because "I can." I wish-I feel with my whole body that I wish. I wish-because I can wish.' [End quote]
Free will has nothing to do with desires, it is unconditioned, it is for its own sake, yet it is not arbitrary or random, it may have a direction which is a reason unto itself. The free will possible to man in this sense is far from the possibility of arbitrary indulgence which is often the only thing modern Western discourse understands with freedom.
Bohort (Namaste) said:djewlew said:Where can I read the article you mentioned, since the Google ads are sitting write on top of part of the text? Very annoying. Can you send the article to my email address, perhaps?E said:We don't infringe on people's free will.
You will find the article below but can't you move or close the Google ads?
emphasis minedomi said:What browser are you using and what is your font size setting? Do you have any browser plugins that could be causing this?cholas said:At the top of the site map is a link that says "Glossary" which does in fact take me to Cassiopedia. Once on this page, the graphics(which are great) as well as the Navigation, Search and Toolbox are blocking the text. When clicking on Adamic Man, for example, the result is still blocked, making it hard to read the page.
Is this just my experience? Is there something I'm not doing correctly?
Can you please take a screenshot of this issue to illustrate?
[...]
this glossary http://www.cassiopedia.org/glossary (messed up glossary)
are they exactly the same?
Bud said:I use the latest Firefox and don't have any problems
realitybugll said:this glossary http://www.cassiopedia.org/glossary (messed up glossary)
and this one http://glossary.cassiopaea.com/glossary.php?l=A (working 1!)
I have not been able to access it for a while because of the tool/search bar coverup. but I know QFS is busy I didn't say anything. is there a solution?
Although this tends to be harder for family and friends to accept especially when they see only their own pain they themselves would feel if the other person took their own life and not the suffering that person
is going through.
dannybananny said:Although this tends to be harder for family and friends to accept especially when they see only their own pain they themselves would feel if the other person took their own life and not the suffering that person
is going through.
It's true but suicide isn't the way, it has it's consequences, and when you do it you start again where you left until you learn lesson, so it isn't really a wise and it won't solve problems. Suffering comes from within(from attachments, wishes, expectations, beliefs - so it's best place to observe it and not concentrate to much what your surrounding thinks and sees, and not concentrate what your programs tell you) and it can come from out like psychical pain but that i think isn't so often like emotional pain.It's best also to be happy with what you have and know that there are people that have less but are happier and then you ask yourself how so?
This clip is great reminder for that!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc4HGQHgeFE
Suffering is life and you can choose if you're going to be victim or anything else you chose to be!
Session 941107 said:Q: (L) What happens to people who commit suicide?
A: Varies according to circumstance.
Q: (L) In a general sense, is there some negative karma
involved in committing suicide?
A: There can be negative karma involved with many things.
Session 990724 said:Q: I have been having a dialogue with a fellow on the net in
the last week or so who is very well versed in the Ra
Material. He sent me a large chunk of volume 5 of the Ra
books, which was material that had not been released earlier.
It seems that during the times that Don Elkins was asking
some questions about different conspiracies and the nature of
the 4th density STS manipulations and some other rather grim
subjects, that there was some sort of judgment made by this
group, or members of this group, that such subjects were not
appropriate lines of questioning for an STO channel. They
were, apparently, considered to be a focusing on negative
aspects, therefore they were not of 'love and light.' Such
questions and directions of questions were, therefore,
discouraged or agreed by this group to be not desirable to
pursue. Don Elkins DID, however, commit suicide. Can you
tell us why?
A: Suicide is a chosen pathway for the purpose of close
realization of shutting off the noise.
Q: What noise did he want to shut off?
A: It is a figure of speech.
Q: I would like to understand. Here, these folks had this
marvelous contact with Ra...
A: Contact with Ra does not preclude the possibility of
attack.
Session 000817 said:Q: We received an email from some guy who says you guys
are 5th density STS, dark forces, and all that. According to
him, you are really leading us down the primrose path. It was
a very upsetting email because he said that everything Ra said
was absolutely the LAST WORD and you guys are chopped
liver, so to say. I shouldn't even ask about it...
A: No reason for upset.
Q: I know. But, he did suggest that Don Elkins committed
suicide because that was his pre- incarnative plan. Is suicide
possibly part of a plan made before incarnation?
A: It is one of many choices available.
Q: In Don's case, was it his plan to commit suicide at that
point, or did he commit suicide because he was under such
extreme attack?
A: Well, his suicide was his choice
Q: Was it his choice before he incarnated? Was it mapped
into this incarnation?
A: It is a choice open to all.
Q: (A) I would like to know what was his reasoning. How did
he justify this choice to himself?
A: It was an escape.
Q: An escape from what?
A: Displeasure.
Q: Displeasure from whom? Himself or others?
A: Many things.
Q: What did this displeasure relate to?
A: Not important!
Q: Did he feel this displeasure from Carla?
A: See previous response.
Q: What was important about what was in his mind?
A: When one feels displeasure, one sometimes chooses to
exit.
I think what needs to be realized is that you can have a person that is in such terrible, terrible pain, such as people who are in extreme pain due to illnesses such as cancer, that they no longer see a reason to stay in this suffering and would rather pass on. There can also be extreme psychological pain that would push someone into wanting to exit their life. Until you are in their shoes, how do you know that they should not have done this?
Clarekav said:When one is in such pain and/or is in a state of despair it takes a lot of effort to come out of it. Sometimes others don't have that energy or drive to do so, also one has to recognise what brought them into that
state in the first place. It can be a struggle and while their are people who do decide to continue to live others don't. It is up to the individual.
Perhaps accepting that (like many things) is difficult for our society especially one that is immersed in ideas of the religions that condemns suicide.