Yesterday I was watching an interview with an Argentinean academic who is working in the USA, talking about babies born to parents vaccinated before conception (not mothers vaccinated during the gestation period). Although the journalist doesn't seem to be very enlightened, I found what the academic said interesting and at some point alarming.
I attach a video with a summary of several babies and another one with the full interview. The interview is in Spanish so I leave here the most interesting points:
(Note: Dr. David Nonis is a Molecular Biologist, has a PhD in neuroscience, a postgraduate degree in biological reproduction and a postgraduate degree in cell regeneration. He has studied in Argentina, USA and Germany, and is currently working on gene editing technologies in California).
Babies...
Interview...
I attach a video with a summary of several babies and another one with the full interview. The interview is in Spanish so I leave here the most interesting points:
(Note: Dr. David Nonis is a Molecular Biologist, has a PhD in neuroscience, a postgraduate degree in biological reproduction and a postgraduate degree in cell regeneration. He has studied in Argentina, USA and Germany, and is currently working on gene editing technologies in California).
- He notes that all babies have some common features:
- Similar facial structures
- Eye colour and shape
- Cranial structure
- Sight (they seem to be able to see clearly almost as soon as they are born)
- Accelerated motor development (upright neck at 1 day old, almost walking at 3 months, ...)
- He is very struck by the homogeneity that occurs in all cases. He explains that a mutagenic factor (physical or chemical) in the same population usually causes different alterations or mutations with diverse and generally harmful effects. In general, mutations are random (different people are affected by different genes) and babies are usually born with deformities or are not viable and die. In these cases, all (or most) babies, under the action of the same supposed mutagenic agent (this could be mRNA vaccines), produce the same effect, what might suggest that there has been a deliberate and premeditated alteration of specific genes to produce a particular effect.
- He talks that we could be facing a new type of human (not a new species or race). These "new humans" could have not only physical/motor alterations, but also behavioural ones. He argues for example that we have no way of knowing what their social behaviour will be like, whether they will be able to empathise like a "normal" human being, or whether they will be more prone to violence.
- At one point in the interview he says that it is very striking how the development of these children seems similar to certain animal species, where motor development is much faster than in humans. This is particularly intriguing because it raises the possibility that the genetic profile of these children could perhaps have a certain inclination towards 2D-type individuals, i.e. the animal kingdom (this last point was not made by the scientist).
- Finally, the scientist claims that he works with the latest, most advanced gene editing technology, and that he and his colleagues cannot even begin to imagine the knowledge and technology that would be needed to obtain such results, i.e. such a precise level of editing and with such homogeneous effects. The science behind this (he speculates), is a science that is not available to everyone and that he assumes must be handled at levels that are not "official".
Babies...
Interview...
Last edited: