Mark Rodin's Vortex Based Mathematics

[mifune]

MarkoRodin.com

Within, you will be taken on a spiraling tour through the toroidal roller coaster of our deterministic universe. Dark Matter, the vibratory essence of all that exists, is no longer on its elusive hide and seek trip -- it has been found! With the introduction of Vortex-Based Mathematics you will be able to see how energy is expressing itself mathematically. This math has no anomalies and shows the dimensional shape and function of the universe as being a toroid or donut-shaped black hole. This is the template for the universe and it is all within our base ten decimal system!

You have entered a place where Numbers are Real and Alive not merely symbols for other things. You will discover that the relationships between numbers are not random or man-made but that numbers are actually elementary particles of which everything is composed. This lost knowledge was well known to our ancients and is now being uncovered for us today. Gradually you will come to see numbers in a simple yet profoundly perfect three-dimensional matrix grid pattern that forms the shape of a torus. The number grid reveals the calibration and timing for an engine that can take us throughout the universe and solve mankind's energy needs. Interested? Delve in...

WELCOME TO MarkoRodin.org

Want to find the answers to the unknown?

Want to see a man-made black hole?

Using a new math that shows that numbers are not man-made symbols, but are actually real, you will see and understand the answers to these questions.

Learn about:

* A particle that does not bend, but causes everything in the universe to curve around it.
* The three toroidal number patterns that are the basis to all mathematics (the pattern of numbers traversing the toroidal surface in, out, and around).
* The universe as an ecological system of renewal.
* Your body being made out of countless stars of the past.
* Proof of an omniscient supreme being.
* Making a coil that produces unlimited free energy.
* A number grid that shows the underpinning geometry of the universe.
* How everything is a torus.
* Making a propulsion source that can take you anywhere in the universe.
* Artificial Intelligence based on a binary triplet.
* The Aetheric Template in DNA that guides evolution.
* The repeating number pattern that solves pi and demonstrates it to be a whole number.
* A mathematics in which numbers do not move, but the functions move instead.
* How numbers form a 3D solid geometric object.
* The secret of a gyroscope -- why it vertically lifts itself upright.
* Wormholes, nested vertices, portals, and doorways.
* Why Dimensions are a result of how things move through space.
* The preferred frame of reference to the universe is based upon the fixed constant number 9.
* Number crunching and encription compression done through cross addition.
* The labrynth maze of the Doubling Circuits where they invert in the center.
* World boundary conditions and inversion seams of nested vortices.
* The bilateral symmetry of the decimal system resulting in polar number pairs having parity by being perfect mirrors of one another.
* The zero is always in the center in the form of the vortex hole.
* Multiplication series are unbroken rings from cross sections of the torus.
* A number cannot be created or destroyed and zero does not exist on a number line or in any multiplication series.
* The number 9 is the node and represents Spirit.
* The numbers 3 and 6 represent the Yin and Yang in the form of magnetism and the number 9 is the S curve.
* The base ten numerical counting system is triangulated.
* Infinity has an epicenter.
* The powers of ten occur by halfing.
* The torus skin models harmonic cascadence.

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE
RODIN COIL AND VORTEX-BASED
MATHEMATICS

As you begin to glide through this explanation of Marko Rodin's fantastic discoveries, please understand that you must set aside many commonly held belief systems of the way the world works in order to fully comprehend the completely new truths that are embodied in this discovery.

This math truly explains everything that ever was, is, and ever will be in the universe, perfectly, with no omissions. As Russell Blake, senior researcher from Microsoft, has said of Marko's work, "This fantastic coherence has existed since the beginning of time but has yet to be harnessed by mankind and the potential is truly mind-boggling." Thus, we invite you to charge forward with all your mind, heart and soul into the enchanting realm we like to call The Rodin Experience.

Mathematics as we know it today is only a tool to symbolize quantities. It simply and shamelessly helps the greedy king count his coins. Vortex-Based Mathematics (VBM) is completely different because it is a dynamic math that shows the relationships and thus the qualities of numbers rather than the quantities. Within VBM numbers are not symbols that stand for something else, NUMBERS ARE REAL AND ALIVE. But what exactly does that mean you ask, well...

At the age of fifteen Marko Rodin projected his mind as far as he could across the universe and asked the question, "What is the secret behind intelligence?" Due to his gift of intense focus or because it was time for him to know the answer, his stomach muscles turned to iron and as he was literally lifted forward he answered out loud, "I understand." What he had gleaned from his query was that all intelligence comes from a person's name. This led him to understand that not only do our personal names and the language they are spoken in highly affect our personalities but that the most important names are the names of God. This led Marko into a journey of thoroughly studying all the world's great religions. When he was introduced to the Bahai Faith he immediately became a believer. Literally days later Marko decided to take The Most Great Name of Bahaullah (prophet of the Bahai Faith) which is Abha and convert it into numbers. He did this in an effort to discover the true precise mystical intonation of The Most Great Name of God. Since the Bahai sacred scripture was originally written in Persian and Arabic Marko used the Abjad numerical notation system for this letter to number translation. This was a sacred system of allocating a unique numerical value to each letter of the 27 letters of the alphabet so that secret quantum mechanic physics could be encoded into words. What Marko discovered was that (A=1, b=2, h=5, a=1) = 9. The fact that The Most Great Name of God equaled 9 seemed very important to him as everything he had read in both the Bahai scriptures and other religious text spoke of nine being the omni-potent number. So next he drew out a circle with nine on top and 1 through 8 going around the circle clockwise. Then he discovered a very intriguing number system within this circle. Marko knew he had stumbled upon something very profound. This circle with its hidden number sequence was the "Symbol of Enlightenment." This is the MATHEMATICAL FINGER PRINT OF GOD.

Follow along as the amazing properties of this symbol unveil themselves to you. Put your pencil on number 1 and without picking up your pencil, move your pencil in a straight line to number 2, then 4, then across the center to 8. Notice that you are doubling. So next should be 16 and it is, but 1+6=7. So move your pencil to 7. Then 16 doubled is 32, but 3+2=5. So move your pencil to 5. Then 32 doubled is 64 and 6+4=10 and 1+0=1. And you're back to 1. So move the pencil across the center and back up to 1. The significance of the Mayan calender is that 64 is one complete cycle of infinity. Then it begins again with 64 doubled is 128 and 1+2+8=11, then 1+1=2. And so on. You will never get off this track as you keep doubling. Notice the infinity symbol has formed underneath your pencil, creating an ever-repeating pattern of 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5. Amazingly, this number sequence stays intact as you half numbers as well. Start again at the 1 but this time go backwards on the infinity symbol. Half of 1 is .5, so move your pencil to the 5. Then half of .5 is .25, and 2+5=7. So move your pencil to the 7. And half of .25 is .125 and 1+2+5=8. So move to the 8. Next half of .125 is .0625 and 0+6+2+5=13 and 1+3=4. So go across to the 4. And half of .0625 is .03125 and 0+3+1+2+5=11 and 1+1=2. So move to the 2. Forever staying on the route of 1,2,4,8,7,5 even backwards.

Incredible... Marko Rodin is applying the Enneagram... http://www.markorodin.com/

 

[christx11]

Incredible... Marko Rodin is applying the Enneagram... _http://www.markorodin.com/

Sounds like incredible word salad to me.

This lost knowledge was well known to our ancients
Want to find the answers to the unknown?
Your body being made out of countless stars of the past.
Proof of an omniscient supreme being.
Artificial Intelligence based on a binary triplet.
labrynth maze of the Doubling Circuits where they invert in the center
9 is the node and represents Spirit
3 and 6 represent the Yin and Yang in the form of magnetism and the number 9 is the S curve

DRC

 

[John G]

Rodin's work and the Enneagram are both kind of small scale patterns coming from larger more useful math structures:

http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/SegalConf2.html#MarkoRodin
http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dhspfskq_353tqfg5

Rodin is very briefly mentioned in the Cs transcripts too:

Q: Acquiring the knowledge to be able to do it puts you there. Awareness binds you to the reality. And I
was reading Plato's Cave, today. You know,the shadows on the wall and everything. And he really said
some interesting things there - a completely analogy of 4th density. All right then ... (A) Well, in fact,
when Tony Smith mention Rodin coils - whatever they are - and toroidal structures - they will probaly be
important at some point.

 

[SeekinTruth]

I just wanted to mention that I noticed a difference in the "order/sequence of the numbers" in the Enneagram pattern in the Rodin article above from my previous limited exposure to it in 'In Search of the Miraculous,' Mouravieff's 'Gnosis' books, and material mentioning it here in the forum/sott/cass sites: previously from these above books, my attention and awareness was drawn only to the 1,4, 2, 8, 5, 7 pattern; whereas Rodin's pattern is 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5 which forms the infinity symbol he mentions.

This Enneagram puzzle is very "deep" indeed. I've been struck for some time by how much potential information it must contain, if one has aquired the knowledge and understanding to "get it."

Also the "problem" of 9 and the "Names of God" Rodin mentions seems to be begging some exploration/re-visiting, but right now I can't exactly formulate my thoughts on it. About 8 to 10 years ago I noticed by chance that any multiple of 9 is also 9 numerologically and thought this must be very significant for a few years; and then I read Laura's Adventures and Wave series around three years ago and came across a pretty comprehensive explication on the issue, and 9 also being a "number of entrapment and recurrence." With the additional information about (Al Arabi's Sufi notions?) "Names and Faces of God" (and related concepts of "Thought Centers" from C's, etc.) I've gleaned from my readings since my introduction to this research network, the mention of 9 and "Names of God" struck a forceful chord, so to speak. Right now "Which names of God?" is rotating in my mind.

 

[John G]

Incredible... Marko Rodin is applying the Enneagram... _http://www.markorodin.com/

Sounds like incredible word salad to me.

That site also has an interview by Rense and an endorsement from Bearden (2 known disinformation specialists) so one certainly has to be careful.

just wanted to mention that I noticed a difference in the "order/sequence of the numbers" in the Enneagram pattern in the Rodin article above from my previous limited exposure to it in 'In Search of the Miraculous,' Mouravieff's 'Gnosis' books, and material mentioning it here in the forum/sott/cass sites: previously from these above books, my attention and awareness was drawn only to the 1,4, 2, 8, 5, 7 pattern; whereas Rodin's pattern is 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5 which forms the infinity symbol he mentions...About 8 to 10 years ago I noticed by chance that any multiple of 9 is also 9 numerologically and thought this must be very significant for a few years

This also relates to the Celtic Enneagram:

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/3199/celtic.html

In the Celtic Enneagram 124875 follows a circle, 1 thru 9 is an infinity pattern, 6-9-3 is a line, 1-4-2-8-5-7 is a criss-cross pattern, and multiples of 9 are opposites. It kind of just depends how you initially plot the numbers as to what patterns you end up with. The Celtic Enneagram is very close to being this magic square where all rows, columns, and diagonals sum to a multiple of 9.

612
594
783

This magic square representation is I think the most accurate as far as the Enneagram's modern day use as a personality type model. It I think has the opposites being opposite personalities and the adjacent positions being "close" personalities. To be really accurate though, you have to have two 3-6-9s (as some modern Enneagram theorists have done though some incorrectly in my opinion want to extend this by doubling up all 9 points). With the extra 3-6-9, things look like the top graphic from here:

http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dhspfskq_353tqfg5

 

[mandell]

depths of rodin

awesome to see the above discussion- thanks every one! :D
can anybody help me to expand some other thoughts on the 'matter'? Rodin exclaims that 9 can/does represent the spirit, an interesting consideration given the relationship to his two main life studies- mathematics and religion, all culminating at his current findings and application.

I noticed an article on sott (science and tech) "what the Hadron is really looking for", is the missing Higgs particle- is this the 9 represented in Rodins work given its representation perfectly as the number 1... (9 by 3=3... 3 by 3=1)... reminds me of another of the C's comments with Ark and Laura relating to Medusa(11) representing a third of the whole(33)... the 'super symmetry' in the article also reminded me of this topic

The sybology spotted in Auch Cathedral (Secret History of the World) as 'Jesus' is put to rest also got my blood flowing a little, only because I felt there was possibly more to the story pictorially? - does anyone else see the wreath being held over Jesus by the unnamed dominant female figure as representing the doughnut shaped universe, and consequently Rodins recent work, with triplets, quantum representations and mobius (as above, so below) neatly all in place.
Also gives possible meaning to the head dress of prominent figures in Auch? - though how amazing would it be to discover that the magnetic fusing of you bodies (Gurdjieff) results in the human capability to apply the vortex based mathematics from within!!!! (with it's production of 3D based in the head hence the turban)

I would love any feedback as I am not a scientist or numerologist, but a few things have struck me like a brick to the head (in a good way with spine tingles from the top down)..
I dont know if Rodin knows how much he has, but I have found a 4 hour lecture of his for anyone keen to find out- the symbology, numerology and simplicity seems unparalleled, and given the C's expectation for Rodins' future relevance, Im keen to hear what others have to say with any knowledge in these areas, as I am lacking

http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=-7911972442098545165&ei=xwUyS5rWOYeYqAOR3fnNDg&q=marko+rodin+vortex+based+mathematics&hl=en&view=3#

 

[anart]

Re: depths of rodin

, and given the C's expectation for Rodins' future relevance,

Hi mandell, could you explain what you mean by this?

 

[durabone]

ditto anart's question.

Marko discovered that the 1,2,4,8,7,5 was a doubling circuit for a very efficient electrical coil. There was still one more very important number pattern to be realized.]Marko discovered that the 1,2,4,8,7,5 was a doubling circuit for a very efficient electrical coil. There was still one more very important number pattern to be realized.

which is the higher dimensional magnetic field of an electrical coil]which is the higher dimensional magnetic field of an electrical coil

Umm, interesting coil winding theory. I have tested quite a few coils. Here's some pretty bold claims:

The Rodin Torus Coil tested at Hewlett Packard and determined to be creating 62.5% greater magnetic output than the present day standard wound electrical coils

COMPUTER PROCESSORS & OPERATING SYSTEMS

The Rodin Solution enables Marko Rodin to design circuitry for computer microprocessors that have no waste heat and - thus, require no refrigeration or heat sink - eliminating all friction, resistance and parasitics. This is possible because:

1) Rodin knows the natural pathway that electricity wants to take without forcing it, scientifically known as the longest mean free pathway of least resistance;

2) Rodin has discovered the source of the non-decaying spin of the electron;

3) Rodin uses electricity´s own magnetic field to bathe conductors in a magnetic wind to maintain constant temperature without any risk of short-circuiting or incinerating conductors.

Data, papers, please? No one is above peer review!

This part reminds me of Bill Fogal:

that creates underpinning nested vortices that are responsible for super-efficiency

He claims in his "Charged Barrier Technology" to be able to create dimensional charge forms inside of electrolytic capacitor gel.

The numbers in squares are very much like John Searle's "Magic Squares"

This seems absolutely over the top to me:

http://rodin.freelancepartnership.com/media/NASA-Inc%20-%20Marko%20Rodin%20Technologies.pdf

EDIT" One more:

artificial man-made black hole and an electrical wheatstone bridge that creates a gravity well on a laboratory bench top

A central claim made by Hatonn & the Space Brotherhood is that repelling magnets curve the space between them towards a black hole.

 

[mandell]

sure Anart-
was looking more at the esoteric symbolism that is used at Auch and it's 'preservation/ hiding' of esoteric truths through this symbology as Laura explains in her book.
I understand that Marko himself has not attributed his technology relating to 4D as of yet- maybe he hasn't read the wave or Secret History, but I wanted to bounce the possibility that his work has more meaning symbolically yet to be understood (re: C's comments), but as a starting point it is represented in his work- relating to shapes and electromagnetic relativity- I would be happy to make more of a fool of myself if this is still not understood.... (as a hypothesis, perhaps given the evidence and coralations of importance in two current separated fields of study in the mainstream, (self discovery and quantum possibilities), the relationship may provide evidence of this 'inner' technology and possibilities, I propose more thought on the esoteric value and symbology as represented at Auch that is away from 3D technology and Marko's proposed application).. not trying to disprove anything, just open a window of discussion if there is another to be opened on a forum such as this?

Perhaps have a look at the link I posted to get more of a vibe on Marko and a NASA-LESS description of his own thoughts given he does not seem to buy into scientific muscle and all the talk that comes with it???

Did you hear NASA are now coming to Australia to discover the secrets of our Aboriginals in Northern WA, (only place in OZ where whole culture is preserved by a few secretive traditionals) so they can learn more about the stars!!!!! The stars dont interest them when stargazing- it's the space between the stars that their culture focuses on? I thought this to be interesting also.

 

[anart]

sure Anart-
was looking more at the esoteric symbolism that is used at Auch and it's 'preservation/ hiding' of esoteric truths through this symbology as Laura explains in her book.

Why would you think that Auch has anything to do with Rodin or that the C's had ever said that anything about his 'future relevance'?

It seems that you are creating theories in your own mind that have no basis in reality.

I understand that Marko himself has not attributed his technology relating to 4D as of yet- maybe he hasn't read the wave or Secret History, but I wanted to bounce the possibility that his work has more meaning symbolically yet to be understood (re: C's comments)

What C's comments - could you quote them, please? Your writing is rather hard to follow, so I can't make out if you are talking about alleged comments made by the C's about Rodin or something else. Any concise clarification you could offer would be helpful.

 

[mandell]

sorry anart- I was referencing C's transcripts from Blulamps above post and it's clear to me 'now' that it was Arks comments (A) in the above transmissions that were posted that I am referring to in regard to Rodins work being relevant in the future (whether scientifically in Arks work or elsewhere-). So apologies for thinking I was quoting the C's (even though they ARE referred to as Laura and Ark and 'us' in the future)...

Now as for Auch, like I said, I was looking at 'possible' relevance of sybology used- see your cover of secret history, and to Laura's questions and ideas on the wreath and turbans in Auch.. re: her afterword in the Secret History, though I was looking for a clearer/updated clarity if anyone had any.

Pardon me for creating theories in my own mind that have no basis in reality (how is this a bad thing to hypothesize if there is possible relevance?), as my intention was to offer and create further thought in a positive direction as another angle of interpretation on this symbology and get some feedback about some possible relevance of the turbans and the wreath in Auch- something that spoke to myself personally- A description of your interpretation of the use of the wreath and use of the turban-like head dress in Auch would be of benefit to me in clearing up the confusion you must have, to give such a reply- and I would be MORE than happy to take it all as it comes as I clearly am not trying to 'change' a view of any scientific study or experimentation.. if you have no interpretations of your own in this matter , then i find your reply extremely subjective.

So what I hear you saying, alternatively to what your replay has stated is- (forgive me again if I am incorrect )

(anart to Mandell)- "your questions of symbology relating to Rodins discoveries have no relevance whatsoever to Auch, and I hear you saying that Rodin himself is somehow relevant, though HE is not either"

If anyone , including Laura might be able to address the symbology in Auch further relating to the Wreath and head-dress/Turbans, than I would love to know more. It just seems to me that the technology in Rodins WORK (given his background also) HAS a deeper esoteric value and if looked at through my above link to Rodins discoveries by his own word, i'm sure you may have some questions of your own.

 

[anart]

sorry anart- I was referencing C's transcripts from Blulamps above post and it's clear to me 'now' that it was Arks comments (A) in the above transmissions that were posted that I am referring to in regard to Rodins work being relevant in the future (whether scientifically in Arks work or elsewhere-). So apologies for thinking I was quoting the C's (even though they ARE referred to as Laura and Ark and 'us' in the future)...

Thanks for clarifying that - makes sense. At this point in time, there is a difference, so when you say 'the C's said' that usually means you can quote a transcript where 'the C's said'.

Now as for Auch, like I said, I was looking at 'possible' relevance of sybology used- see your cover of secret history, and to Laura's questions and ideas on the wreath and turbans in Auch.. re: her afterword in the Secret History, though I was looking for a clearer/updated clarity if anyone had any.

Pardon me for creating theories in my own mind that have no basis in reality (how is this a bad thing to hypothesize if there is possible relevance?), as my intention was to offer and create further thought in a positive direction as another angle of interpretation on this symbology and get some feedback about some possible relevance of the turbans and the wreath in Auch- something that spoke to myself personally- A description of your interpretation of the use of the wreath and use of the turban-like head dress in Auch would be of benefit to me in clearing up the confusion you must have, to give such a reply- and I would be MORE than happy to take it all as it comes as I clearly am not trying to 'change' a view of any scientific study or experimentation.. if you have no interpretations of your own in this matter , then i find your reply extremely subjective.

I was merely looking for some clarity on what you had written because it was coming across as 'word salad' and very hard to follow.

So what I hear you saying, alternatively to what your replay has stated is- (forgive me again if I am incorrect )

(anart to Mandell)- "your questions of symbology relating to Rodins discoveries have no relevance whatsoever to Auch, and I hear you saying that Rodin himself is somehow relevant, though HE is not either"

Nope, not saying that - I was trying to get you to clarify because it is very easy to ascribe importance or connection to things that are not there with ones imagination. Just because a wreath resembles a torus does not mean it is a symbol of a torus, for example. The information gathered thus far in this thread on Rodin would indicate there isn't 'much there', as it were, so for us to understand where you're trying to go with this it is absolutely crucial that you be as clear and concise as possible. Hopefully that clarifies at least a little.

 

[henry]

mandell, I, too, find it difficult to understand much of what you have written in the various posts you have made so far, try as I may to read and reread them. When you write, do you consider how your messages will be interpreted by the reader? If not, it might be a useful experiment to try.

Sometimes this problem arises with new members who are used to participating in other forums where messages are tossed off with little thought. It works differently here, as you'll discover. :)

You might spend some time reading the old threads to get a better feel for it.

 

[mandell]

thanks guys, i'm used to expressing myself more in person and through conversation.
I intended to ask if anyone had any thoughts that relate to my own, not to impose a direction that does not exist.

Given there is no comments on this matter I shall leave it there, and research further.

I hope to be clearer in the future.

 

[mandell]

I would like to know if anyone has any further ideas about what the wreath may represent at Auch given there is always more to be interpreted? RE: anart comments on symbolism and the toroidal structure not being represented there?
any further ideas of your own you would like to add? (as this was my original intention in my first message)

If this is not plain enough I urge no reply. thanks