Laura said:So, basically, at this point, I don't get the impression that Jim Marrs is COINTELPRO.
I've come across the same point that Crossfire was behind the JFK movie, and got the same feeling that since it was ok, he might be ok, too.Laura said:I've got his book "Crossfire," but haven't had time to read it yet. I've heard that it is the source for the info behind Oliver Stone's movie "JFK" so that suggests it at least goes in the right direction.
So, basically, at this point, I don't get the impression that Jim Marrs is COINTELPRO.
I just checked the index and didn't see it in there. I'm pretty sure I first heard about him in Final Judgment (when I read the intro some months back), so I don't know of any other 'popular' sources that talk about him. Mike Piper recommends a recent book called "Supermob" that he described as "disgusting", I believe, because of the depravity of the real mobsters.beau said:Hmmm, do you remember if Jim mentioned Meyer Lansky at all hkoehli? I swear it was him
I read "Rule by Secrecy" too and thought it was excellent how he connected the dots going backwards in time. Keep in mind that at the time of his writing Sitchin was the latest news. I also read "Inside Job" that was asking more questions than giving answers and did not consider the Zionist angle. Then again if he has been leaned on, the title says clearly where he is coming from.OPINMYND81 said:I read his "Rule by Secrecy" about 4 years ago and was impressed by the breadth of what he covers.
What kind?dantem said:However, the "Friend of Jim" page in his official website give us some clues...
With the further I agree, the later I cannot judge.Dantem said:Anyway, we just need more clues, isn't it? Or it's just that my reading instrument is off?
.. 'aparently' sounds a bit like projection as the page is clearly not called CLOSE friends. ...And yes, I read everything concerning Rense on thease pages (and posted some) and agree 100%, however I doubt Maars has. Which reminds me, I shall send him an email and make him aware of it and link the threads.Dantem said:(or apparently close friends)
Sounds like you have a bit of a personal investment here, Fifth Way. Why would Mars have Rense listed on his site at all? It doesn't take a genius to see that the Rense site is ripe with disinfo. Also as far as this comment is concerned:fifthway said:.. 'aparently' sounds a bit like projection as the page is clearly not called CLOSE friends. ...And yes, I read everything concerning Rense on thease pages (and posted some) and agree 100%, however I doubt Maars has. Which reminds me, I shall send him an email and make him aware of it and link the threads.
It sounds a bit abrupt, to say the least. How can you 'not judge' when all dantem is asking is if he is seeing this situation in a way others might be seeing it - or in an objective way. If you agree that we need more clues, then that would indicate that dantem's reading instrument here is not off.fw said:With the further I agree, the later I cannot judge.