Mr. Premise
The Living Force
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/200306charliesheen.htm
A Defiant Sheen Challenges Official 9/11 Fable on National TV
Dares Millions of Viewers to "Do [their] own research"
Prison Planet | April 15 2006
Actor Charlie Sheen made history when he first questioned the official story of 9/11, calling it the "biggest conspiracy theory of them all." Sheen's comments sent shockwaves across the alternative media and have been one of the biggest stories on the internet for weeks. The story also garnered prime time coverage by major news outlets including CNN, FOX News, and hundreds of newspapers worldwide.
Following his brave step into the spotlight over his 9/11 questions and the ensuing backlash of attacks and hit pieces, Sheen issued an email statement to the media demanding that he be challenged on the facts instead of junior high name-calling. Not one single mainstream media outlet has had the nerve to take Sheen up on his challenge.
Only a few days after Sheen's story broke in the mainstream press, sources within FOX News and CNN told Alex Jones off-the-record that there was a concerted effort from their companies' management to "kill" the Sheen story and to end any favorable coverage of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Producers were given this dictate despite the record high ratings and positive audience feedback that was received from coverage of the Sheen 9/11 story.
On Friday, April 14th on ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live talk show, Sheen once again brought forward his questions about the official story to tens of millions of Americans. When asked by host Jimmy Kimmel about the statements he made on The Alex Jones radio show, Sheen succinctly remarked, "I just had questions, I had a lot of questions."
He went further, decrying the media's treatment of his statements, noting that "[the mainstream media] didn't really take a look at any of the stuff I was asking them to look at, any of the evidence or any of the stuff that generated those questions..." instead they spun it into the story of whether or not he was "qualified" to question the government.
"I felt the only real validation that I needed was being a tax paying citizen that loves my country," Sheen expressed to a powerful round of applause from the studio audience. Sheen continued, "What happed to the time in this country when we were entitled, when we had a constitutional and a God-given right to be curious about things that didn't make sense."
When asked by Kimmel what had brought him to pose his questions about the official story, Sheen replied, "I've done a lot of research," then referred to the growing number of high-profile individuals who have already bravely stepped forward to ask questions about 9/11, stating "...its not just me, its the people that have come before me - the experts and the engineers, the physicists and the scientists and the scholars, that raised a lot of these things and I took a look at their research and said yeah, it doesn't add up, a lot of it doesn't add up, hence these questions."
Before Kimmel moved the discussion to another topic, Sheen was careful to remind the audience, "There are two areas: Building 7 and the five frames from the Pentagon. Don't listen to me, do your own research."
Following the broadcast of the Jimmy Kimmel Live show, Alex Jones spoke with Sheen about his views concerning the interview. Sheen made the following statement:
"This is a landmark moment in the 9/11 Truth Movement. We have fired a flaming arrow into the heart of the myopic propaganda posing as the irrefutable official story. Come one, come all, the floodgates have opened! Reveal your patriotism."
In response Alex Jones stated, "In my 12 years of broadcast, I have broken hundreds of stories that have gained national attention, but none have captured the imagination of the people like Charlie Sheen's statements on 9/11. Universally people recognize that his courageous stand has smashed the floodgates and the tide has now turned. The 9/11 Truth Movement saw its birth over four and a half years ago and it witnessed an unprecedented infusion when Charlie Sheen spoke out. "
"The bottom line is that people resonate with Charlie Sheen's courage. The average man or woman understands that Sheen is taking a risk by saying aloud what they have only thought about in secret: 9/11 was an inside job and the foundational event for the police state growing in America and the pretext for the ongoing wars for global empire."
For challenging the US corrupt government's official story? Lol, I see that 'honour' more likely going to either Tom Cruise or Mel Gibson. They're better 'connected' into the PTB's establishment.EsoQuest said:Personally, I wouldn't be surprized to see him in the starring role of a new 9/11 movie.
No, for getting the people's attention and trust so that the PTB can "uncover" a kindler, gentler story that involves corruption of people and not the system itself. For playing an instrumental role in deepening the trance, and helping to get the real perpetrators off the hook. I really wonder who isn't connected to the PTB's establishment. There are after all many layers of connection and willingness to work with the PTB.Ruth said:For challenging the US corrupt government's official story?
The 9/11 truth movement's focus on the WTC demolition isn't too surprising seeing as it was the most visible (and therefore accessible to investigation?) of the three events. And they must have been 'on to something', even if it was just attracting a whole lot of attention, for Cointelpro to ramp up so quickly against them and compromise them. Were they the first to get compromised, I wonder?Joe said:I have a sneaking suspicion that it serves the interests of a certain lobby in America for the threat of 9/11 exposure to be kept hanging over the Bush administration. While the 9/11 truth movement is united on the demolition of the twin towers and WTC7, the Pentagon attack that has become the source of "division". This would appear to be the work of Cointelpro. Why must unified efforts to expose the truth of the Pentagon attack be thwarted? Because the Pentagon attack contains the seeds of the double cross and the potential to expose the fact that the US government is beholden to another entity.
Joe
The so-called "9-11 Truth" Movement was never really about sincere individuals wanting to out the truth. It is inevitable that groups of these individuals have become a big part of the movement over time but as ever truth is never the goal of any movement begun by a pathocracy. It is ultimately designed to divert.Ruth said:The 9/11 truth movement's focus on the WTC demolition isn't too surprising seeing as it was the most visible (and therefore accessible to investigation?) of the three events. And they must have been 'on to something', even if it was just attracting a whole lot of attention, for Cointelpro to ramp up so quickly against them and compromise them.
Read what Joe has written again.Focusing on one plane crash and its consequences seems to me to be diverting attention from the others. I'm sure Cointelpro would find that quite appropriate. I believe its best to keep attention on all three. They all have glaring inconsistencies, its just that the Pentagon is the MOST glaring (where did that Boeing go to again - its not 'parked' on the lawn?).
Indeed. And forcing acceptance of this lie only deepens the trance state of the masses.Darren said:Yes, the Pentagon attack is most glaring, by design.
You're talking about a LOT of money. 757's are tens of millions of dollars, and the operational costs of one are something like $50 per minute. At least, that's what one of my former flight instructors told me. Not to mention all the people you'll need to hire to install the remote control hardware, and the pilot who will be flying the thing remotely. And they bill by the hour.Laura said:Darren said:So, again, as Jean-Pierre Petit suggested last night, it would be SO easy to expose THAT lie by building a facsimile of the section of the Pentagon that was hit, get a used 757 loaded with cadavers, luggage and fuel, and remote control crash it into the facsimile. That would settle, once and for all, exactly what happens when a 757 hits the Pentagon.
If the 911 Truth Movement wants to really put the perpetrators where they belong - behind bars - then THAT'S the thing to focus on. Raise the money to conduct the experiment, and it'll be all over.
I'm wonderding why I haven't heard this even proposed before. It sounds reasonable, and it sounds affordable. Do you think it's just one of those ideas that hasn't been proposed because it's right under one's nose, or because it's not considered reliable (although I woundn't know why)? I'm pretty much running out of rational explanations why a considerably large "truth movement" hasn't even speculated (to my knowledge) in this direction.John Chang said:I wonder if anyone has tried doing this yet?