Biden-Harris Administration: The Empire Strikes Back

Yes, it reminds me of a 1973 film Soylent Green...


A more updated in depth analysis video: SOYLENT GREEN DECODED

It was not Charlton Heston's best movie or anyone's but it was "creepy" too.

It is not precisely Biden-related but I can see why you might have posted that trailer with all the shenanigans we are seeing now.
When I saw "The menu" other references came to my mind, for example Bunuel's Exterminating Angel. Actually putting the trailer here wasn't a great idea, not because it doesn't fit, but because I don't want to spoil the plot. So, sorry :-)
 
A possible future for government in the US - if it isn't already in the works...


'This is a unique point in our history. Our rulers lack either powerful intellects or great accomplishments. They have no leadership aura, having advanced through coercion and corruption. Both parties’ leaders are mostly empty suits with little to no substance. If one leaves, a new one fills the space without disruption.'

A government of officious martinets​

By Joe Strader
 
Will anything come of this?
Long shot, but Supreme Court, apparently, will at least decide on whether to hear it, in January.

The case is interesting and its main point is clever because it does not focus on election fraud. Its basis is that all these gov't officials violated their oaths of office by not investigating credible accusations of election fraud, which they are supposed to do (to serve the American people, etc., etc.), and the accusations came from other members of Congress (who are presumably credible). There's a good case for that - but, of course, it seems unlikely that anyone looking at the suit will not see beyond that fine point, and, of course, has to consider the unprecedented broader implications of indicting half of Congress.

 
How the FTX money laundering worked is basically how all Foreign Aid works in the same way. It's a theft from the taxpayers by their elected politicians and their corporate partners.

Here is a quick review for those of you (probably few) who may not yet know or have forgotten. The standard method, as described by many, including John Perkins in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, is to take taxpayer money from the treasury and give it to a corrupt/compliant foreign leader (usually of a developing nation), with the condition that X% of the funds must be used for some kind of project, and that particular (corruptly led) US-based corporations must be hired to execute the project. AND, typically, the recipient nation must borrow more money from the World Bank/IMF to complete the work and thus go into debt. These contractor corporations are the stealth partners of the donor nation's politicians who ensure that the money is appropriated through Congress, Parliament, or whatever governmental body holds national purse strings.

The project is typically some kind of public-works thing that pretties up the foreign nation's capital city, or something similar that doesn't particularly benefit the local people, but looks good for the leader. The leader, of course, pockets a smaller Y%, which he/she uses to pay off his/her inner circle, and so on (the machinery of hierarchical management), so the whole thing stays well obfuscated from the public.

The contractor corporations vastly overcharge for their work, get rich, and funnel Z% back to the donor country's political sponsors as political donations (to the Party, a PAC, a charitable foundation, etc. or some other ostensibly third party). They do this so that the politicians will keep renewing the schemes in the same country and setting up the same schemes in new countries. There are a thousand other crooked benefits: keeps foreign leaders happy and compliant; keeps their nations from developing into rivals; drives the recipient nations into debt with the banks, subjecting them to control; opens foreign markets, etc., etc.

This also sheds light on why there is a revolving door between corporate and political positions of power (remember Halliburton / Dick Cheney, as just one example). This is also basic fascism, by Mussolini's definition.

In the end, the donor nation's taxpayers are deceived, ripped off, and left susceptible to repeated theft, yet are completely ignorant of it, and even feel good about helping poor nations (emotionally manipulated), and remain eager to support more such endeavors. See: Ukraine.

1671225769819.png
 

FBI must be abolished – former US presidential candidate

"The agency used its influence at Twitter to unconstitutionally crush free speech, retired congressman Ron Paul argues"

Now we have proof that the FBI (along with US intelligence agencies and the Department of Homeland Security) have been acting through ‘private’ social media companies to manipulate what Americans are allowed to say when they communicate with each other,” the former Texas congressman wrote in his weekly column for his website, the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity. "

We do not need the FBI and CIA and other federal agencies viewing us as the enemy and attacking our Constitution. End the Fed…and end the Federal Bureau of Investigation!” Paul concluded, referencing his long-standing call to liquidate the US’ privately-held central bank."

 
In the latest episode of 'THE TWITTER FILES,' journalist Michael Shellenberger reveals "How the FBI & intelligence community discredited factual information about Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings both after and *before* The New York Post revealed the contents of his laptop on October 14, 2020."
 
'It is profit after all: Zelensky urges US Congress to "invest" in Ukraine's destruction.'

22 Dec, 2022

By Ilya Tsukanov - 3 hours ago (Updated: 2 hours ago)
 

Every social media firm censors for US government – Musk


"Most people don’t appreciate the significance of the point Matt was making: *Every* social media company is engaged in heavy censorship, with significant involvement of and, at times, explicit direction of the government.Google frequently makes links disappear, for example."

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 27, 2022

 
As if there weren't enough machinations being uncovered to make one sick already --- this may not be "Biden Administration" specifically but it grotesquely reflects the woke-ism of the regime.

There really is a destructive war on merit to keep those who excel away from positions of leadership. To me, it represents a clear push towards communism, in which all are equal - at the bottom - except for the state authorities who rule with absolute power.

This story amounts to criminal behavior on the part of educators, IMO. And it looks like a precursor to Standards-Based Grading, a scary development that removes numerical % scores and letter grades and replaces them with four grade tiers that, if I'm not mistaken, allow for a lot more subjectivity and woke-ist fudging to advance "equity." For example, it may be implemented with every student receiving 50% simply for showing up, removing penalties for not doing work or cheating, and withholding top scores from outstanding students. Look it up and it may be difficult to find anything negative being published about it, because most of the articles come from already woke academia.

 
I found this today as I did my news round up.. I thought it was interesting, and yet another reason why the US would never fight Russia directly.

WSJ: U.S. Army hires recruits with mental disorders

The U.S. Department of Defense allowed 700 recruits diagnosed with ADHD to enlist in the Army.

The U.S. Department of Defense allowed 700 recruits diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to enlist in the Army, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported Dec. 27. This came after the Army changed its rules on medical conditions that prohibit applicants from enlisting.

The reason for this change is the lack of recruits. The problem is that only 23% of young Americans meet the criteria to enlist in the Army and less than 10% are interested in doing so, notes the WSJ in reference to Armed Forces statistics. In addition, the population is increasingly taking medication for various mental disorders, and public health officials believe such problems increased among young people during the pandemic.

Moreover, by the close of the U.S. fiscal year in October, the Army had not met its recruiting goals and was left with a 25% shortfall. In fact, 2022 was described by Secretary of the Armed Forces Christine Wormuth as "the most difficult recruiting year" since the abolition of the draft in 1973.

In June 2022, the Army declared that those who have suffered from disorders and illnesses from a list of 38 different medical conditions could enlist if they had not shown symptoms or needed medication for treatment for a period of time, between three and seven years, depending on the specific condition.

Among those conditions are two mental behavioral disorders: ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder. Sufferers can still enlist in the Army if they did not take medications and did not show symptoms for three and seven years, respectively.

Changes to the recruiting system have in the past drawn criticism that it may lower standards, putting the military at risk in the long run. For example, the influx of enlistees with drug convictions and school dropouts during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars led to an increasing number of suicides and mental health problems in the Army in the years that followed.

However, supporters of the policy point out that without this measure the Pentagon will find it increasingly difficult to meet its needs. In addition, once accepted into the Army, soldiers will be able to consume the same medications that they are prohibited from taking before enlisting. These medications are usually prescribed by military doctors.

The U.S. Army has often been slow to adopt changes to the admissions process, WSJ says, citing U.S. military officials. For example, it did not approve women putting highlights in their hair until 2021, and the wearing of pearl earrings remains prohibited even outside of combat.

However, the military revises recruiting standards to respond to societal changes, Lin St. Clair, deputy for Admissions, told WSJ. "The services have made adjustments, maybe not as fast as society changes. But they are working to catch up," she noted.
 
Back
Top Bottom