Huge mothership spotted by NASA.

Avala said:
I have found this on one blog, and blog author said that he find it on some forum, probably shiny mish-mash but it is interesting, and motherships are mentioned. I will not post blog address because I don’t want to any who read this make some prejudice from other content on that blog.

However, here it is:
Reads like FUD disinfo. (FUD = fear, uncertainty, doubt)
Reminds of resume writing in the sense that the text has all the right words in it that the target audience is looking for: new world airport, Denver, geodesic orbit, underground mega-bunker, reptillian, mother ship, etc.

The following sentence takes the cake though IMO:
They are remarkable in many aspects not the least of which is their ability to respond to changing commands with the software being encoded on the underside of the craft.
Now the writer is just laughing in the gullible reader's face.
If you're trying to warn somebody you're not going to waste time with useless details. Especially if you are part of a secretive organization and probably monitored you're going to minimize your exposure by getting the message out with as little noise as possible.

The following sentence is also interesting:
Do not be surprised if major earthquakes and volcanic activities increase during this time; it will be a result of scalar weaponry that will be used.
So the message is that it's scalar weaponry doing this and accept that as the answer for these activities. And how is that a side-effect. And what are scalar weapons to begin with?

More proof that there is a website out there for anyone to vector ones thinking.
 
Keit said:
The main problem I had with this article (hxxp://www.ufoarea.com/events_ufowakes.html) is:
Usually, when someone post an image made by NASA satellite or other "big authority" satellite, they like to add a link to the original image in order to strengthen their claim (example - all the anomalies found in Mars mission images). But in this case, not only there is no link to the original image, no one can copy the image (distribute it), they also add another image made by NASA (this time with precise details how and when) and say that this is NOT like the one they present as image of mothership.
So naturally I have several questions: Where is the proof that it was done by NASA satellite? If it is something "leaked" and secret, it holds the same credibility as other "leaked" images (if there are any) so why this one is more credible? If it is indeed an image that we can find on an open source - why UFO Area doesn't link to this source or allow others to copy the image?

Maybe there is a way to contact UFO Area guys and present them with those questions?
This is their email ufoarea777@yahoo.com
 
What strikes me personally is that they have to TELL US WHAT TO SEE in this picture. Where did we encounter such tactics? Photos of debris from Pentagon were described in similar way. There was a lot of junk resembling...nothing particular, but of course we were TOLD that this or that gizmo is a part from 757.

Oh, I found something - you'd better see it folks:

http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=6209
 
Laura said:
Q: What programming?

A: See Bible, "Lucid" book, Matrix Material, "Bringers of the Dawn," and many other sources, then cross reference...
This "Lucid" book - to what were the C's referring? Project Lucid by Texe Marrs by any chance?
 
This could be a result of the high strangeness happening in our atmosphere lately, that may not necessarily be "ships" but more like "atmospheric" phenomena, because there is definitely something serious happening to our upper atmosphere (lower too really), and this "weirdness" is getting very common actually.

Laura brought that up before and explained what she found, here are the posts:

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=4764.msg33430#msg33430
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=4764.msg33447#msg33447
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=4764.msg33473#msg33473
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=4764.msg33603#msg33603
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=4764.msg33794#msg33794
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=4764.msg33905#msg33905

That whole thread is worth reading again. It touches on chemtrails as well, which is most likely a distraction to mis-direct researchers who are trying to figure out what's going on with the atmosphere. HAARP is also a similar vector, to make people think that weather changes are due to HAARP. And I know that many New Age sources are "channeling" information that certain clouds are "cloud ships", as in, ships in disguise. Again, this sounds similar - like a vector designed to lead any honest researchers into false conclusions by "giving" conclusions to them. As j0da noticed, and I think he's spot on with that, is that they're telling us what to conclude. Similarly, the same thing is going on with HAARP and with "chemtrails" and "cloud ships" etc. And yet there's evidence that suggests that it is much bigger than all of that, where none of those explanations "match up" to all the data. And at the end of the day, we cannot ignore data just cuz it doesn't fit these explanations, we have to throw out the explanations instead and look for those that match all the data.
 
anart said:
can you address these questions directly?
No.

It would be useless, and I already said it directly twice. Think of it what you wish, delete all, if you think its noise, do whatever you want to do.
 
I think based on the description, this mysterious "NSA operative" is talking about this UFO. Those who followed that thread, know that it got ridiculous as it went from a bunch of "leaked" videos on youtube and supposed screenshots to what looked like "blueprints" that were supposedly scanned from some super-secret government research document. You know, the usual. The reason I think it's that same UFO and that same group that has been mysteriously dropping this "multimedia material" around is basically this statement from the "NSA operative" guy:
...They are remarkable in many aspects not the least of which is their ability to respond to changing commands with the software being encoded on the underside of the craft.
Which correlates to what has been mentioned about that spikey UFO in the aforementioned thread. So
yeah, very "smooth operation" going on here :rolleyes:. Can anybody else smell the very familiar stench of Aussie Bloke? In other words, this whole fiasco with the pictures/videos/blueprints/nsa guy looks like a nice little PSYOP. I wouldn't be surprised if it is the same guys that did Aussie Bloke - and pulling on those strings led to some very serious crap like the porn industry etc, it's a long story.

I did a quick google search, it seems like Avala got his/her (dis)information here:
_http://galaksija(dot)info/forum/viewtopic.php?p=37916&sid=28e6f698bf21cbe74d87f4ec15bc1883

Avala, what makes you think that revealing the above source would lead to prejudice instead of the opposite, provide data that can be used to ascertain what is going on here? Do you know the purpose/nature of this forum - have you seen any tendency to assume and prejudge here? Otherwise I don't understand why you say that, your logic makes no sense to me. And why the resistance to answer a few pretty important question anyway? You said it would be useless, but useless to whom - to you or to Anart or perhaps to other forum members? I find it strange that you're so defensive about it. What's a little external consideration gonna cost you anyway?

It reminds me of this guy. Mysteriously shows up, slaps a bunch of pictures from a mysterious forum, uses really weird capitalization/punctuation in his writing, and disappears. Ok tangent - you ever watch that show "America's Got Talent"? They have a panel of judges that have huge red buttons with a big "X" on them that makes an annoying AAAAAAACK noise when they hit it. I wish we had a huge button like that here so we could hit it as soon as something like that happens. Based on all the responses that guy got, clearly everybody else felt like hitting that button too, you know? And j0da's post really amounted to hitting that button, the word "ridiculous" was understating it, osit.

Avala, can you elaborate on why you think it would be useless to elaborate on the thinking process that went into your post with the NSA guy's quote in it? You certainly don't sound like you see anything wrong with it, so I think that alone is reason enough to discuss it.
 
Actually I got my disinformation here, and that’s I why I was thinking better not to say where I get it.

_http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?messageid=409276

Maybe just like you, but you weren’t lazy and you find that one down on google.Except there was none of back thought like with your post, maybe you don’t believe it, or don’t know for better, but I am very disappointed.


SAO said:
Avala, can you elaborate on why you think it would be useless to elaborate on the thinking process that went into your post with the NSA guy's quote in it? You certainly don't sound like you see anything wrong with it, so I think that alone is reason enough to discuss it.
Elaboration of my thinking process in this thread probably would be interesting and useful.
Same as yours in this last post. You know what am I thinking on, and I will not say anything about it any more.

SAO I am very sad and disappointed, this is final thanks and god buy.
 
Avala, you are acting like a petulant child who stomps his/her foot when they don't get what they want. The fact that you are so emotional leads me to believe that something else may be bothering you. I sense some mis-directed energy. What's on your mind?
 
Avala said:
I will not post blog address because I don’t want to any who read this make some prejudice from other content on that blog.
I want to point out that this is manipulation, lack of sincerity with the forum members here, and basically amounts to contempt. It is also the method favored by disinformationalists not to mention the Bush Reich and cronies.
 
How peculiar - it's our usual suspects that run the show... Godlike Productions and ATS :)

hxxp://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?messageid=409276
hxxp://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread291803/pg1

From ATS:
dntwastetime said:
OK, I recieved this email via, Alan DeWalton (aka BRANTON) Meta Terran News Group. This is from Sherry Shriner.This is possibly a ATS SkunkWorks thread. I thought I would try it in Aliens/UFO first.
OK this is nuts and most certainly a hoax so....Don't shoot the messenger. Thanks DWT
Ohh, if you don't know them already, you might want to check who those nutzoids are:

Branton
hxxp://www.angelfire.com/ut/branton/brantonia.html

Sherry Shriner
hxxp://www.sherryshriner.com/sherry/intro.htm

But wait, there is more...this drone BS is beginning to evolve: hxxp://aliendrones.com

They have a "mission statement" already!

aliendrones.com said:
Wednesday, 12 May 2004

We recognize the importance and grave seriousness of the question of whether our government is withholding potentially life changing information related to extra terrestrials and their echnologogies. We feel the information Isaac has provided along with the various photos and eyewitnesses that this may be the best opportunity at disclosure the UFO community has had to date.

It is our mission and hope that this website will along with others working on the Isaac/Drone information will force our government to disclose all information and materials currently in its possession relating to extra terresterials and their technologies.


Last Updated ( Sunday, 15 July 2007 )
Notice the first date? So it's supposed to be a long story, huh. Too bad this website was registered (yeah, by proxy) 26-jun-2007.
 
In short, Avala was propagating a hoax and either knew it, or just "wanted to believe it was true", so decided to withhold the source. Like I said, that's not how we work. You do not get to the truth of any matter without investigating every aspect of an data bit.

What features in there is the ASSUMPTION that we would automatically dismiss the item simply because it came from GLP or ATS which is not the case. We would certainly look upon it skeptically, but would investigate. This attitude of "assumption," or deciding what others do or do not "need to know" is one of the chief characteristics of STS even if the individual is firmly convinced they are on an STO path.

As Mouravieff wrote:

Often the Knight is defeated because he was serving the Devil with all his heart while sincerely but mistakenly believing that he was serving Christ.
 
For the record, the Aussie Bloke fiasco was in fact tied to the owners of GLP, that same forum where Avala found this new and similar "warning". And similarly for ATS, many of the things "Posted" on ATS were in fact tied to the owners/sponsors of ATS itself, as research showed as well. I think those are both good examples for why revealing as much data/sources as possible can only help determine the truth, and hiding the sources helps hide the truth.
 
Back
Top Bottom