In the last exchanges that we have had, these last weeks, on space, time, relativity, the nature of light and the constancy of its speed, the nature of the 4th "dimension" of space and the imaginary number i, we have arrived at a core of central questions whose mathematical translation would allow us to advance towards the reality of the Unified Field, of THE formula of physics and mathematics because, without a doubt, at this level of mathematics and physics are ONE.
If I were to find myself in the presence of the C's, here are the questions that I would submit to them in order to advance on the Path of Knowledge. Knowing that They are us in the Future, I remain convinced that these questions will reach them during the next session of the Cs, one way or another:
· Is the Riemann hypothesis about the Zeta function accurate? Has it been proved? If yes, by whom? If not, is the revision of the concept of the number i the simplest way to prove it?
· Why is there no observation of the variation of the speed of light, according to Einstein's theory, even with frequency ? Because he locked the evidence of such a variation by his assumptions at the base of his theories? Because we are not aware that this variation is linked to the nature of time? Because the collective planetary consciousness is not ready for such an observation?
· You said that speed of light varies with frequency : Is the frequency you are talking about that of light or a new type of frequency characterizing the 4th "dimension" of space? Indeed, you have confirmed to Ark that the 4th "dimension" is of a frequency nature.
· What is the nature of the 4th "dimension" of space? You said (November 14, 1998) that we had not made a certain assumption in physics that would have allowed us to find it : is this 4th "dimension" the frequency of the observer's consciousness (1), the 3D speed of light which is thus revealed as the frequency of light when we are in 4D (2) or the Ether as a new spatial reference (3)?
Now that we have this Gordian knot to move past, I'm going to dive into what @Bluegazer pointed out to me to dig deeper into the nature of Ether as the interface between information and manifestation and to encounter the quaternions which should shed more light on what lies behind the presence of the imaginary number i.
Thanks very much for all your messages and contributions, Eric
If I were to find myself in the presence of the C's, here are the questions that I would submit to them in order to advance on the Path of Knowledge. Knowing that They are us in the Future, I remain convinced that these questions will reach them during the next session of the Cs, one way or another:
· Is the Riemann hypothesis about the Zeta function accurate? Has it been proved? If yes, by whom? If not, is the revision of the concept of the number i the simplest way to prove it?
· Why is there no observation of the variation of the speed of light, according to Einstein's theory, even with frequency ? Because he locked the evidence of such a variation by his assumptions at the base of his theories? Because we are not aware that this variation is linked to the nature of time? Because the collective planetary consciousness is not ready for such an observation?
· You said that speed of light varies with frequency : Is the frequency you are talking about that of light or a new type of frequency characterizing the 4th "dimension" of space? Indeed, you have confirmed to Ark that the 4th "dimension" is of a frequency nature.
· What is the nature of the 4th "dimension" of space? You said (November 14, 1998) that we had not made a certain assumption in physics that would have allowed us to find it : is this 4th "dimension" the frequency of the observer's consciousness (1), the 3D speed of light which is thus revealed as the frequency of light when we are in 4D (2) or the Ether as a new spatial reference (3)?
Now that we have this Gordian knot to move past, I'm going to dive into what @Bluegazer pointed out to me to dig deeper into the nature of Ether as the interface between information and manifestation and to encounter the quaternions which should shed more light on what lies behind the presence of the imaginary number i.
Thanks very much for all your messages and contributions, Eric