A interview with Catherine Austin Fitts that helps understanding:

The Great Taking​

Story at a glance:
  • David Webb, a former hedge fund investor, has written a book called “The Great Taking,” as well as filmed a documentary by the same name. His book and film detail how the Federal Reserve influences financial markets, and how its money creation has outpaced economic growth of the U.S., which is a huge red flag indicating that the velocity of money is collapsing
  • Central bankers and other globalists have carefully planned the coordinated takedown of the financial system using highly sophisticated strategies, including the manipulation of derivative markets. Whatever securities you believe you may own, you’re not the actual owner of, and when the derivative markets collapse, everything can be taken from you
  • While Webb’s work raises serious concerns, there are other more pressing issues that need our attention. Priority No. 1 is ensuring we have control over our financial transactions. We need to help state legislators to protect financial transaction freedom
  • North Dakota has a sovereign state bank, and the Florida State Legislature is getting ready to introduce legislation for state banking in the state of Florida. All states need to do this, as it’s one of the primary ways to protect the financial freedom of all citizens
  • Priority No. 2 is building and securing food freedom, and No. 3 is transparency and education. We need to educate people about the severity of what’s coming, so that we can, en masse, begin to make different choices
 

Attachments

  • david-webb-the-great-taking-pdf.pdf
    152.7 KB · Views: 1
So next WEF annual gathering in Davos will be held from 15-19 January 2024.
In recent Redacted show they talked about their panels:

The theme in Davos this year is Rebuilding Trust

Preparing for Disease X (panelist is Big Pharma)
With fresh warning from the WHO that an unknown "Disease X" could result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic, what novel efforts are needed to prepare healthcare systems for the multiple challenges ahead?

Securing and Insecure World
Persistent conflict, intensifying climate crises, a fragile global economy and the potential risk of new technologies are creating a complex global security environment.

United States's Role in the World
The United States remains a pivotal actor in the international financial system, on geopolitical issues as well as in the development of next-generation technologies.
Given the fundamental transformations in the world, how will the US respond and where will it lead?

Transforming Energy Demand
By 2050, estimates indicate that the global economy will have doubled in size and will be serving a population of over 10 billlion people. In this context, improving energy efficiency is critical to delivering and affordable, secure and climate-aligned future.

What can companies and governments do to enable economic growth with less energy?

The Race to Reskill
As a quarter of jobs are expected to change in the next five years, millions of people will need to move between declining and growing jobs.

From precision learning to workforce planning, what are the innovative business and policy approaches to facilitate reskilling, upskilling and job transitions?

Defending Europe's United Front
European nations have made unprecedented strides both in increasing and pooling resources for their collective defence, with common procurement for military supplies for Ukraine, Finland in NATO and Sweden not far behind, and Denmark signing up to Europe's joint defence policy in the space of two years.

Yet, as domestic politics in Europe and in its key security partners threaten unity, what are the implications for European defence cooperation?

Where Is Freedom of Expression Going?
In the past decade, freedom of expression has declined in regions around the world. Emerging technology, disinformation and cyber censoring are among the elements deepening the dire enviroment for the press, communities in conflict, educational systems and individuals.

What does the data on freedom of expression reveal about trends, warnings and solutions to mitigate the threats?

Fighting the Obesity Epidemic
Global levels of obesity have tripled in the past 30 years and continue to rise to epidemic proportions.
With new advances in science fueling demand for solutions, how should societies and health systems better prepare for and respond to obesity?

You can watch show here. And if you, by accident ;-) didn't hear about NYC Secret Tunnels, you can also check out in the continuation of the show.
 
This poem by Eduardo Galeano (Uruguayan journalist and writer) seems to describe what the WEF thinks of 99%

THE NOBODIES

The fleas dream of buying a dog
and the nobodies dream of getting out of poverty,
that some magical day
good luck will suddenly rain,
that good luck will rain down in torrents;
but good luck doesn't rain yesterday,
nor today, nor tomorrow, nor ever,
nor does good luck fall from the sky in a drizzle, no matter how much the nobodies call it and even if their left hand itches, or they get up with the right foot, or start the year changing their broom.

The nobodies: the children of no one, the owners of nothing.

The nobodies: the Insignificant , the nonentity, running the hare, dying the life,

-flicked- the nobodies, -flicked-:
Who are not, though they are.
Who do not speak languages, but dialects.
Who do not practice religions, but superstitions.
Who do not make art, but handicrafts.
That they do not practice culture, but folklore.
That they are not human beings, but human resources.
The nobodies: the children of no one, the owners of nothing.
That they do not have faces, but arms.
That they do not have names, but numbers.
That they do not appear in universal history, but in the red chronicle of the local press.
The nobodies, who cost less than the bullet that kills them.
The nobodies: nobody's children...
The nobodies: the owners of nothing,
screwed, screwed, screwed, screwed, screwed...
1384966703389.jpg
 
There's a new BOI in USA town, and they want the BIO of everyone involved in business/financial entities. It was passed as a part of the military budget bill during the last days of the Trump administration over his veto (vetoed for reason of internet liability).

A. General Questions

A. 1. What is beneficial ownership information?

Beneficial ownership information refers to identifying information about the individuals who directly or indirectly own or control a company.
[Issued March 24, 2023]
Back to top

A. 2. Why do companies have to report beneficial ownership information to the U.S. Department of the Treasury?

In 2021, Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act on a bipartisan basis. This law creates a new beneficial ownership information reporting requirement as part of the U.S. government’s efforts to make it harder for bad actors to hide or benefit from their ill-gotten gains through shell companies or other opaque ownership structures.
[Issued September 18, 2023]
Back to top

A. 3. Under the Corporate Transparency Act, who can access beneficial ownership information?

FinCEN will permit Federal, State, local, and Tribal officials, as well as certain foreign officials who submit a request through a U.S. Federal government agency, to obtain beneficial ownership information for authorized activities related to national security, intelligence, and law enforcement. Financial institutions will have access to beneficial ownership information in certain circumstances, with the consent of the reporting company. Those financial institutions’ regulators will also have access to beneficial ownership information when they supervise the financial institutions.
FinCEN published the rule that will govern access to and protection of beneficial ownership information on December 22, 2023. Beneficial ownership information reported to FinCEN will be stored in a secure, non-public database using rigorous information security methods and controls typically used in the Federal government to protect non-classified yet sensitive information systems at the highest security level. FinCEN will work closely with those authorized to access beneficial ownership information to ensure that they understand their roles and responsibilities in using the reported information only for authorized purposes and handling in a way that protects its security and confidentiality.
[Updated January 4, 2024]


The William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (NDAA 2021) is a United States federal law which specifies the budget, expenditures and policies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2021. Analogous NDAAs have been passed annually for 59 years.[1] The act is named in honor of Representative Mac Thornberry,[2] who served as either the chair or the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee. Thornberry retired from Congress at the end of the congressional session.[2][3]

The $740 billion bill includes pay raises for America's soldiers, modernizations for equipment, and provisions to require more scrutiny before troops are withdrawn from Germany or Afghanistan. President Donald Trump had threatened to veto the bill because it did not include a repeal of 1996 legislationshielding internet companies from being liable for what is posted on their websites by third parties. The bill also includes a provision to limit the president's use of emergency declarations to divert military construction funds to finance the expansion of the Mexico–United States barrier.[4][5] Another provision within the act would require the military to rename bases that were named after figures from the Confederacy. The act also contains multiple anti-money laundering provisions and effectively bans anonymous shell companies.

The bill passed both the House and Senate with veto-proof majorities on December 11, 2020. On December 23, President Trump vetoed the bill. The House and Senate voted on December 28, 2020, and January 1, 2021, respectively, to override the veto; this was the only veto override of Trump's presidency.[6]
 

The Government’s Plan to Criminalize Your Thoughts​

Story at a glance:
  • Documents received by investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Alex Gutentag and Matt Taibbi from an anonymous but “highly credible” whistleblower reveals new details on how the U.S. censorship-industrial complex — a network of more than 100 government agencies, private firms, academia and nonprofits — seeks to police and criminalize “wrong-think”
  • The documents describe how the modern digital censorship programs were created, and the various roles of the military, U.S. intelligence agencies, civil society organizations and commercial media
  • They also describe the methods and techniques used, such as the creation and use of sock puppet accounts to spy on and steer online discussions and propagate desired narratives, and the discrediting of dissenters “as a necessary prerequisite of demanding censorship against them”
  • The documents show that the weaponization of the financial sector originated with the Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL), which expressly sought to get banks to “cut off financial services to individuals who organize rallies or events”
  • The CTIL files also show there was a clear intent to circumvent the First Amendment by outsourcing censorship to the private and nongovernmental sector. According to the whistleblower, “The ethos was that if we get away with it, it’s legal”
 

Attachments

  • ctil-files-documents-pdf.pdf
    352.7 KB · Views: 2
History repeats
L‑2 The Future: Technology, Theocracy and the Thousand Year Reich
MP3: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 (Approx. 118 minutes)
Posted by FTR ⋅ January 20, 1995
Transcript Snip:
First, the discussion focuses on the conflict between corporate profits and both substantial wages and benefits and strong environmental protection policy. This conflict results in an element of cognitive dissonance on the part of most people (who must work for a living.) In order to maximize profit, discomfort must be correspondingly maximized as well.

Human behavior is dictated largely by two principles that psychologists call the pleasure principle and the reality principle. In a nutshell:
People do what makes them feel good. When they feel bad, they must alter their environment in such a way as to remove the discomfort. They can either change their external environment or their internal environment. Political action, labor and environmental organizing would certainly bring change that would relieve social and environmental distress. That is not as profitable as holding down wages and profits. Profits can be maximized if people can be made to alter their internal environment in such a way as to endure or even enjoy discomfort (what Mr. Emory refers to as learning “to enjoy sitting on a tack.”)

There are a variety of ways of getting people to attempt this. If they are inebriated on drugs or alcohol, their pain will be attenuated (at least temporarily) and their will to resist blunted. In this context, opium would be “the religion of the people.” The real thing might be even better.


LOL!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-01-14 at 05-07-58 The San Francisco Standard (@sfstandard) _ X.png
    Screenshot 2024-01-14 at 05-07-58 The San Francisco Standard (@sfstandard) _ X.png
    463.4 KB · Views: 9
An amazing clip from... Amazing Polly:

As the WEF and WHO drum up fear of “Disease X” there is a new set of narrative gatekeepers assembling a phony Dream Team of ‘covid dissidents.’ The trouble is most of them supported all the mandates!
 
An amazing clip from... Amazing Polly:

As the WEF and WHO drum up fear of “Disease X” there is a new set of narrative gatekeepers assembling a phony Dream Team of ‘covid dissidents.’ The trouble is most of them supported all the mandates!

While I credit her for being very astute about Covid and getting it right so early on, I also wonder if maybe she isn't being a little too cynical about Brett Weinstein here. Weinstein, as we know, has made a very big and positive impression of late (7M views) from his interview with Tucker. I think the whole hour of it is worth watching in case anyone's missed it.

What is particularly strong about Weinstein's presentation is what he says about the US' plans for ceding sovereignty to the WHO's international vaccine mandates, travel passes, and all that that entails. He speaks about it with a gravity that suits the frightening nature of it all as well.

Yes, he leaves things out of the interview (its only 1 hour after all), and was slow to come to the dissident party by his own admission, but there was nothing so far that suggested to me that he may be some kind of gatekeeper going forward now that's he's established some credibility on the subject with a very large audience. But we'll certainly see.

So I just think that Polly knows, from direct experience, just what it takes to 'break the wall' on just such a subject - and battle the onslaught of the main narrative from the start. And resents the attention and benefits received by the latecomers who lacked insight at the beginning of the pandemic, and avoided the attacks endured by the first wave of battle-weary 'Covid dissidents'.

 
Back
Top Bottom