harpoonflyby
The Force is Strong With This One
By using evidence we are all familiar with I would like to propose a counter theory - the WTC building collapses prove that they were in fact DESIGNED to collapse. Forget planes, pods, 4000 deg kerosene fires. Forget bombs too (but not completely). These structures collapsed perfectly and consistently, being such immense structures, laws of probability would demand any demolition scenario, even one of the highest order of ingenuity and orchestration, could not have been re-produced three times in such a short amount of time. I propose that the WTC since time of inception was intended to collapse.
Explosive charges were embedded in some fashion into the core structure of the buildings. This conclusion is derived solely on the fact that WTC7 came down catastrophically. Therefore with all variables equal, that is, marginal intensity fires, marginal structural damage, it logically points to any WTC collapse as not because of planes and fuel (albeit allegedly fuel was involved in WTC7 but not even the same kind of fuel, and even so under entirely unique circumstances). It is far too difficult to envision the demolition could have been planned and implmented to such a public place, under a single administration of government- which keep in mind had just begun. So how could a hush and rush job not leave behind any trail of evidence, go completely unnoticed by anyone? Someone somewhere would have blown the whistle, probably out of greed for money.
It wasn't a rush job. Forget just a moment about demolition teams sneaking into the building and planting explosives, mysterious evacuations and fire drills in the days or weeks before 9/11, this stuff is too simple. In the 30-35 years before 9/11, when WTC was being planned and architected, where were we? We were in the middle of the Cold War, a war comprised of nothing more than delusions and tensions. Defence agencies of the government back then, you know the types that gave us NORAD a secret bunker in a mountain, implemented a self-destruct mechanism for the WTC buildings as a contigency scenario in the event of communist invasion. Possibly more buildings are involved. This was done to preclude the enemy from setting up any useful command and control centers from a likely location - the center of American business, commerce, gov't intelligence. In other words the WTC buildings were designed, or covertly adapted, so they could be brought down at will, thus demolishing any useful intelligence or resources. Watch any of the Indiana Jones movies? Since wars in ancient times peoples have boobytrapped their lairs in the event of being overrun, to prevent your enemies from using your own fortress or weapons against you, but also to destroy treasure or secrets.
We can only speculate as to the how, what, why of the initiation of the self-desctruct. Ask yourselves however, what is easier to believe, this "late-in-the game" scenario to collapse buildings as part of a single, giant, fully calculated false-flag operation, such as one most truth movements support, or, sort of an "opportunistic" false-flag operation born out of serious miscalculation, and subsequently covered up by equal parts of truth and lie?
Explosive charges were embedded in some fashion into the core structure of the buildings. This conclusion is derived solely on the fact that WTC7 came down catastrophically. Therefore with all variables equal, that is, marginal intensity fires, marginal structural damage, it logically points to any WTC collapse as not because of planes and fuel (albeit allegedly fuel was involved in WTC7 but not even the same kind of fuel, and even so under entirely unique circumstances). It is far too difficult to envision the demolition could have been planned and implmented to such a public place, under a single administration of government- which keep in mind had just begun. So how could a hush and rush job not leave behind any trail of evidence, go completely unnoticed by anyone? Someone somewhere would have blown the whistle, probably out of greed for money.
It wasn't a rush job. Forget just a moment about demolition teams sneaking into the building and planting explosives, mysterious evacuations and fire drills in the days or weeks before 9/11, this stuff is too simple. In the 30-35 years before 9/11, when WTC was being planned and architected, where were we? We were in the middle of the Cold War, a war comprised of nothing more than delusions and tensions. Defence agencies of the government back then, you know the types that gave us NORAD a secret bunker in a mountain, implemented a self-destruct mechanism for the WTC buildings as a contigency scenario in the event of communist invasion. Possibly more buildings are involved. This was done to preclude the enemy from setting up any useful command and control centers from a likely location - the center of American business, commerce, gov't intelligence. In other words the WTC buildings were designed, or covertly adapted, so they could be brought down at will, thus demolishing any useful intelligence or resources. Watch any of the Indiana Jones movies? Since wars in ancient times peoples have boobytrapped their lairs in the event of being overrun, to prevent your enemies from using your own fortress or weapons against you, but also to destroy treasure or secrets.
We can only speculate as to the how, what, why of the initiation of the self-desctruct. Ask yourselves however, what is easier to believe, this "late-in-the game" scenario to collapse buildings as part of a single, giant, fully calculated false-flag operation, such as one most truth movements support, or, sort of an "opportunistic" false-flag operation born out of serious miscalculation, and subsequently covered up by equal parts of truth and lie?