Re: Michael Ende's 'Momo' - an allegory for Laura & the C's?
Hi Atuya,
Thanks for your thoughts.
Maybe you can read the book to gain a broader understanding of this particular work? I think sometimes we jump at "far-out" conclusions a bit too easily (I include myself here). That is not to say that there wasn't maybe some form of "channeling" involved with Ende's work, but my understanding is that we should focus on the most "down to earth" explanations first before engaging in speculations.
For example, it seems that Ende's work was inspired a lot by the esoteric and mystic literature available to him, especially the works of Rudolf Steiner. I think he borrowed many concepts from these works and as I wrote above, he had a clearly non-materialistic view of the universe and spoke out for a marriage of science and mysticism.
Could you clarify a little bit what you mean? While enthusiasm is certainly a great motivator, I think it's better to be on the cautious side when it comes to the idea of "you create your own reality", which can be easily misleading. I'm not saying that this is the case with you, but maybe you want to read a little bit more about that (see here for example).
Again, would you mind to clarify?
And I can only recommend to read Momo and the Neverending story, I think these are brilliant (and highly entertaining) books!
Hi Atuya,
Thanks for your thoughts.
Atuya said:I've not read the book, and only just discovered it while reading this thread, but from the descriptions and observations posted above it seems that this is a documented case of 'past-future communication' manifested on the BBM.
Given the particulars of the book and the subject matter itself, maybe we have before us a clear case of past-future communication via consciousness. Could it be that the work around the Cassiopaeans in the 21st century has created a beacon of light in the not so distant past? Perhaps the positive growth of this network NOW has put roots into the THEN, literally and literarily?
Maybe you can read the book to gain a broader understanding of this particular work? I think sometimes we jump at "far-out" conclusions a bit too easily (I include myself here). That is not to say that there wasn't maybe some form of "channeling" involved with Ende's work, but my understanding is that we should focus on the most "down to earth" explanations first before engaging in speculations.
For example, it seems that Ende's work was inspired a lot by the esoteric and mystic literature available to him, especially the works of Rudolf Steiner. I think he borrowed many concepts from these works and as I wrote above, he had a clearly non-materialistic view of the universe and spoke out for a marriage of science and mysticism.
Atuya said:Do we will into existence more inspirational literature of this type? Why not? We will do what we will do!
Could you clarify a little bit what you mean? While enthusiasm is certainly a great motivator, I think it's better to be on the cautious side when it comes to the idea of "you create your own reality", which can be easily misleading. I'm not saying that this is the case with you, but maybe you want to read a little bit more about that (see here for example).
Atuya said:And upon reviewing my words, I note the usage of inspire, perspire... into breath, through breath. Or: Ende on the benefits of EE :)
Again, would you mind to clarify?
And I can only recommend to read Momo and the Neverending story, I think these are brilliant (and highly entertaining) books!