Is The Constitution a Scam?

j0da

Jedi Council Member
Some time ago we were discussing Bird Flu Hoax (http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=624) and the implications of the issue. During the thought exchange we came to such a grim point:

DonaldJHunt said:
j0da said:
And..heh, isn't mandatory vaccination in conflict with your constitution?
What is this "constitution" thing of which you speak? Some of our elders speak of such a thing having existed before the Great Darkness, but it is best not to talk of such things...
The US Constitution itself is held dear by many, even if it is trodden, torn apart by The Patriot Act and rulers conduct. Many people belive that if only said document could be brought to it's former glory most, if not all of the disease consuming the country would be conquered.
But..is this hope really based on firm ground? Is The Constitution REALLY something, which should be cherished and protected, something we can rely on in most dire moments?
The ideas conveyed in constitutions reflect the spirit of the nations and most honoured values of societies, they document the evolution of thought and give testimony to the advanced vision of coexistence – at least they are supposed to be that way. We are all so proud of our constitutions and the rights assured therein, aren’t we? Whatever happens we think we can fall back to our constitutional rights. CAN WE?

A couple of months ago my attention was drawed to this subject and what I found during my research was rather chilling. Here is what I have discovered in the countless data contained within the world wide web:

Here is the shocking Truth about the American constitution, and it is the unkindest cut of all. After spending all that time, effort, and resources attempting to secure your rights and freedoms under the man-made constitution, the bottom line at the end of the day is: YOU ARE NOT EVEN A PARTY TO THE CONSTITUTION! It is a contract between: the States, the founders (through their insider legal establishments of those incorporated States), and the king of England. The constitution itself was not signed by any human, it was only signed "In witness" on behalf of the States. Since you are not a party to that contract, then you can't possibly have ANY rights under that contract. This, and ALL constitutions are just part of the elaborate CON by the Hidden Hand. Think about it, just exactly WHO are the "We the People of the United States" that the constitution refers to who formed the "Union"? Most patriots jump to the conclusion that it includes every American "Sovereign" Citizen, don't they? But is that conclusion correct? Where in the document is the term defined, which could support that conclusion? It doesn't really say it anywhere, does it? This myth is what the Hidden Hand's educational system teaches, so that's a very good reason to be suspicious straight away. Once again we turn to the research of Stephen Ames, and his essay entitled "The Ultimate Delusion", demonstrating the contrary, where he states:

"...Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted [to be] paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the founding fathers, their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states 'But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it.'..."

Bearing the above in mind, please read again both the Preamble to the constitution and Article 7, and you will see it in a whole different Light:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

"Article. VII. The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the same.
...done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth. In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
...In Convention Monday, September 17th 1787. Present The States (note well: NOT the human "signers"/witnesses!) of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Mr. Hamilton from New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia." (my emphasis added)

So, hopefully you see, and if you don't you aren't paying attention, that even if you were 100% successful in fully restoring your rights and freedoms under a constitution, then you have really gained nothing, you have only been conned. Since constitutions are written by the Hidden Hand to further their goals, you will have sacrificed your time, effort, relationships with family & friends, resources and maybe even your life, and will have simply gone in a circle - playing right into your enemy's hands. Constitutions are set up as a trap by your enemy, and those who reach the end of that blind alley are like Dorothy, the Scarecrow, the Tin Man, and the Cowardly Lion, searching for the mythical Wizard of Oz. At the end the only thing they find is just a man behind a curtain pushing buttons and pulling levers to create illusions of power. This "wizard" could give them nothing that they didn't already have.

Source: http://i.am/jah/plan.htm
How about that? The devil is in the details, eh? Immediately after this somewhat shocking discovery I went in hurry to analyze polish constitution. It turned out that knowing a document by carefully reading it and dissecting information contained within is a completely different thing than knowing it vaguely from school, media and hearsay. I found out that the constitution of my nation is nothing more than a mere joke, for it’s construction in many points goes as follows:

The citizen has the right to .... unless the legislation act states otherwise.

And how difficult is to change legistalion? How difficult it is to pass new laws by means of manipulation and deceit, enslaving the “flock” and furthering the interests of PTB?

I encourage everyone to carefully read the constitution, wherever you live, in whatever country – just go and look for yourself. It may be a very interesting lesson of how many rights we REALLY have. Disillusion may be painful, but you have been warned.
 
There is a chapter from Manly Palmer Hall's book "The Secret Destiny of America" which describes a strange guy who popped up just before the signing, gave an impressive speech and disappeared. No-one knows who he was. I'll transcribe the chapter when I get back home.
 
i think the opening bit is bunk. Just because "We the people..." isn't clearly defined doesn't make it ambiguous. I mean, its like saying one must define the term apple if one wants to use it legally.... "We the people of the United States of America" is an unambiguous identifier describing "the people of the united states" ergo - all who live there.

Now, that said, i do think it was written by bankers and legislators, IE - the elite. And given today's state of affairs it's not really important whats written and what isn't, nor the legal implications of same. What matters is the IDEA of the constitution. The power that it's citizens BELIEVES it gives them. This is what matters, take away those rights and you'll have upheavel, even if you claim to have "the legal right" to based on whatever lawyer trick you can con up.

Although the patriot act got passed, and waco happened, so who's to say that we are entitled anything.
 
Sorry Cyre2067, but I "beg" to differ with you:

cyre2067 said:
I think the opening bit is bunk. Just because "We the people..." isn't clearly defined doesn't make it ambiguous.
Did you ever really comprehend the swearing in of witnesses? I know I didn't until it was explained to me.

"Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?"
While this whole thing seems redundant (to me), it was designed by lawyers and was done so to avoid ambiguity.

"To tell the truth"

Sure, but to satify this all you need to do is tell it once about one thing.

"The whole truth"

Sure, but there is nothing to stop you from adding a whole bunch of lies to the truth to bias the story into something different.

"And nothing but the truth"

Sure, but to satisfy this all you need to do is not lie. Q: "Where were you on the night of Tuesday the 5th of November?" A: "Its half past three."

So the oath contains all of the legal framework to make the point inescapable. Especially by a lawyer.

"We the people" is ambiguous in the US Constitution if only because of the following:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
Now here it is very clear that persons includes "free persons" (i.e. not slaves), those bound to service (i.e. in jail) but does not include Indians nor 2/5 of a slave. If "we the people" was unambiguous, this section would be quite redundant.

For the purposes of apportioning the House, the definition suddenly becomes much more clear as to what a person is. This is because prior to this point it was ambiguous.

In reference to Representatives, there is the use of the word "person". In reference to Senators there is also the word "person", however for the president and vice president there is frequently the masculine pronoun "he". However for the definition of who may run for president and how this "person" is elected, we again see the word "person". This ambituity allows Hillary to run for president. :O

If "people" was unambiguous, then we would never have needed Amendment XIX, which "gave women the right to vote".

'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,' it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.'
 
The PTB will do whatever they want regardless of what's written and what isn't or how it can be interpretted. People believe they have free speech, etc. they won't buy the argument that "oh by the way, the constitution was never ment to include you, so we're just gonna take all these freedoms away now." I'd like to see them try that one.

Although they've already done away with freedom of religious expression, freedom of the press, and the right to privacy... maybe the people just won't notice when they take away the rest... ::shrugs::
 
But Cyre, that's the point - PTB do whatever they do - not "regardless" what is written in The Constitution, but also thanks to how said document is contructed. If Stephen Ames is right - it's all legal fiction. If you are not party to it, than you and other american citizens never, ever had any unalienable rights. Some rights were granted to bigger or lesser extent by PTB just to perpetuate illusion, to keep people in their sleep, in warm fuzzy feeling they "have rights". But what good are rights when you don't use them? Just when you try to do exactly that - you are thrown to arrest and face the judge who tells you "you are not a party to the constitution". How many times have I heard about people facing charges of insulting a court because they tried to invoke their constitutional rights? So, again, if Stephen Ames is right, NO ONE is taking your rights away - you never had them in the first place!
 
Doesn't anyone find it absolutely amazing that the lives of ensouled beings are defined by inanimate objects? That most people in the US worship a corpse nailed to a piece of wood and stake their freedom on a piece of paper, even though some of those who wrote it declared that it was something that would require frequent renewal?

And so we live in a culture where "people will go crazy" if the corpse-on-a-tree myth is questioned, and where they are willing to bow their heads when a bunch of lawyers declare their paper "ambiguous". And we live in a culture where our very thinking shorts out just because a few clever psychopaths decide to play with words (using double-speak etc).

To me this is nothing short of extreme pathological idolatry. Not just idolatry but a binding addiction to idols instead of the meanings they are supposed to represent. The truth is that like all "things" the letter of the law suffers decay, but its spirit is immortal. And its spirit is based on what is RIGHT. For two hundred some years nobody really considered this "ambiguity" because people were focused on what the constitution represented not on what it said verbatim. Then a few smart characters got a bunch of lawyers to find loop-holes, and all of the sudden freedom is GONE.

I for one would like to know what is the difference between W declaring the constitution "legally" invalid, and him just tearing it up because he feels like it? In both cases he spits upon the inalienable rights of the people. Is he more justified in stomping on those rights in the first instance, i.e., are the people unjustified in affirming those rights? And speaking of "legality", this president doesn't have any legal reason for being in the White House in the first place, as he was never really elected, so really there is no law.

I understand the points made about the letter of the law, and how such contracts have to be precise to avoid misunderstanding. If the Constitution is ambiguous a democratic society would correct it, and draw a new contract.

But that's not really the point here, is it? The point is that the PTB want people to FORGET that there is such a thing as the spirit of the law, and to IGNORE that the PTB are trying very hard to keep a sleeping giant (the People) from awakening, and remembering that besides what is legal there is what is RIGHT, and that RIGHT defines legal, and not the other way around.

Waking up is not easy, not for one person in the face of a blaring alarm clock, and certainly not for collective that has been asleep for most if not all their lives. Imagine being born literally asleep and unconscious, in the throws of a nightmare. How can you possibly even relate to what it means to be awake? And yet we all know that when we are locked in a nightmare we DO awaken (often sweating, panting and/or with a shout) when we will ourselves to do so.

And the first step is not to come up with a "list of solutions" that we can all follow like good little soldiers. That is just more idolatry and the need for a "plan" to pull us through. I am not against a solution, but I do not believe that a solution is forthcoming when we keep our eyes peeled for a menu of salvation instead of right here in ourselves to fire up our now drugged and sleeping creative potential, which is the only thing that will give us our solution.

So before the solution can come we need to get the blood back into our capacity to come up with one. We need to learn to think out of the box of meandering words and legalities. We need a change of perspective, and we need to share a different way of seeing the world and assessing it with others so it becomes commonplace, natural and a powerful substitute for PTB hypnotic traps.

THEN we will find ourselves in the SPIRIT of capability to find a solution that does not play by the PTB's rules of terror, violence and mayhem. And when the eternal sleeper awakens, comprehension will come because being awake may not be familiar, but it is natural and wired into our very genes, and we will take to it like a duck takes to water.

The only other alternative is to let lawyers and psychopaths call the shots, both figurative and literal.
 
Point well-taken J0da, but we might want to distinguish the Constitution, which was an anti-democratic, pro-property rights document (the drafters' comments at the time make this clear, see also Charles Beard's work) and the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution in order to give it enough popular support. When the public talks about Constitutional rights they usually mean the Bill of Rights, not things like the setup of the rights of the Federal Government and bicameral legislatures. Because it was a political compromise, it is a mixed document with some good things and bad things. In defense of the drafters, the bad things were added so the wealthy and powerful would not destroy it and the Bill of Rights was added so the average people might support it.

Given that and given all its flaws, most of us will accept things like the Senate (which protects the interests of the rich and powerful) as long as we get the Bill of Rights.

Don
 
Wow, I've just learned that there is more to the story, so without further ado...

"The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation!"
by Lisa Guliani

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
— Preamble of the original "organic" Constitution

"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
— Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776

Fourth of July 2002 has come and gone, and Americans honored the holiday with a renewed patriotic fervor that reminded me of the Bicentennial celebrations of 1976. As is customary, traditional fireworks displays took center stage and scores of people turned out to witness the dazzling show in the summer sky. With mixed feelings, I sat with friends on a crowded Pennsylvania sidewalk beneath a glittering, mesmerizing explosion of color, pondering the keen sense of sadness and betrayal that overwhelmed my spirit. Looking around at the huge crowds gathered for the annual events, I thought silently, "We are not free." In truth, we have not been a free people for a very long time.

We celebrate this day in honor of our "independence". We call ourselves a free people in a land of liberty. Our anthems proudly sing the praises of this nation, and we raise our voices, wave our flags and join in song — but how many Americans realize they are not free? This is a myth perpetuated by the powers-that-be in order to avoid any major civil unrest, and to keep us all living under the thumb of a militaristic corporate Big Brother within the illusions that have been created for us. The truth of the matter is this: what freedom has not been stolen from us, we have surrendered willingly through our silence and ignorance. As Americans, most of us have no idea how our freedoms are maintained — or lost. Apparently, our ancestors didn't have a good grasp of this either. It is sad, but it is also very true.

Don't point to that beloved parchment, the Constitution, as a symbol of your enduring freedom. It is representative of a form of government which seemingly no longer exists in this country today. The Constitution has been thrown out the window, the Republic shoved aside and replaced with a democracy. The thing is; most people in this country remain unaware that this is so because they simply do not know the truth — what lies beyond the myths. Your so-called government is not going to tell you, either.

To even begin to understand what has happened to the Republic, we must look backward in time to the period following the Civil War. We must go back to the year 1871, which was the beginning of the decline of the Republic. When we examine what happened during that time in our history, we begin to piece together this troubling, perplexing puzzle that is "America" — only then should we answer as to whether we are indeed a "free" people or not.

So, let's roll backward into the past for a moment. It is time we learned what they didn't teach us in school. It is far more interesting than what they DID tell us. I think you'll stay awake for this lesson.

The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let's look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated "front" for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.

The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

"The Constitution for the united states of America".

The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.

Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me — and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the "organic" Constitution, we now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a "privilege" which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.

So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word "Sovereign," we must think about what the word means.

According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.

In other words, our government was created by and for "sovereigns" — the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign — remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: "government is subject to the consent of the governed" — that's supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays? I don't.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia — encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does.

You see, you are presumed to know the law. This is ironic because as a people, we are taught basically nothing about the law in school. We are made to memorize obscure factoids and paragraphs here and there, such as the Preamble, and they gloss over the Bill of Rights. But we are not told about the law. Nor do our corporate government schools delve into the Constitution in any great depth. After all, they were put into place to indoctrinate and dumb down the masses — not to teach us anything. We were not told that we were sold-out to foreign interests and made beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress to the international bankers. For generations, American citizens have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay on a massive debt that they, as a People, did not incur. There are many, many things the People have not been told. How do you feel about being made a beneficiary of somebody else's massive debt without your knowledge or consent? Are we gonna keep going along with this??

When you hear some individuals say that the Constitution is null and void, think about how our government has transformed over time from a municipal or service-oriented entity to a corporate or profit-oriented entity. We are living under the myth that this is lawful, but it is not. We are being ruled by a "de facto," or unlawful, form of government — the corporate body of the death-mongers — The Controllers.

With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion — all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain — and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don't suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That's because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works — and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law — better known as the "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas", respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.

The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as "departments" such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These "departments" all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the Constitutional Republic.

I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the "corporate empire of the UNITED STATES," which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You'll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!!

Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can't get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us — as in the case with the illegal income tax — among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period.

The great number of committees and sub-committees that the Congress has created all work together like a multi-headed monster to oversee the various corporate "departments." And, you should know that every single one of these that operates outside the District of Columbia is in violation of the law. The corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY state of the Republic beyond the District of Columbia. Let this sink into your brain for a minute. Ask yourself, "Could this deception REALLY have occurred without the full knowledge and complicity of the Congress?" Do you think it happened by accident? You are deceiving yourself if you do. There are no accidents or coincidences. It is time to confront the truth and awaken from ignorance.

Your legislators will not apprise you of this information. You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to "give" you — at a price. Be wary of accepting so-called "benefits" of the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Aren't you enslaved enough already?

I said (above) that you are presumed to know the law. Still, it matters not if you don't in the eyes of the corporation. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. We need to turn that around if we are to save our Republic before it is too late.

The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death. The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue? Think long and hard about all those bills you pay, all those various taxes and fines and licenses you must pay for. Yes, they've got you by the pockets. Actually, they've had you by the ass for as long as you've been alive. In your heart, you know it's true. Don't believe any of this? Read up on the 14th Amendment. Check out how "free" you really are.

With the Act of 1871 and subsequent legislation such as the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment, our once-great nation of Sovereigns has been subverted from a Republic to a democracy. As is the case under Roman Civil Law, our ignorance of the facts has led to our silence. Our silence has been construed as our consent to become beneficiaries of a debt we did not incur. The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation.

Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there. Are we to forgive and justify this crime against the People? You have lost more freedom than you may realize due to corporate infiltration of the so-called government. We will lose more unless we turn away from a democracy that is the direct road to disaster — and restore our Constitutional Republic.

In an upcoming article, we'll take a closer look at the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment and how we became "property" of the corporation and enslaved by our silence.

I am saddened to think about the brave men and women who were killed in all the wars and conflicts instigated by the Controllers. These courageous souls fought for the preservation of ideals they believed to be true — not for the likes of a corporation. Do you believe that any one of the individuals who have been killed as a result of war would have willingly fought if they knew the full truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his life for a corporation? I think not. If the People had known long ago to what extent their trust had been betrayed, I wonder how long it would have taken for another Revolution. What we need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We change our thinking and we change our world.


Will we ever restore the Republic? That is a question I cannot answer yet. I hope, and most of all — pray — that WE, the Sovereign People, will work together in a spirit of cooperation to make it happen in this lifetime. I know I will give it my best shot — come what may. Our children deserve their rightful legacy — the liberty our ancestors fought so hard to give to us. Will we remain silent telling ourselves we are free, and perpetuate the MYTH? Or, do we stand as One Sovereign People, and take back what has been stolen from the house of our Republic?

Something to think about — it's called freedom.
---
My heartfelt thanks goes out to the following people for their gracious and generous assistance in researching this subject: Ken S. of American Revolution II Online News, Paul Walker of RMN News, Bob Taft, Stanooch, and Willy Whitten — true Patriots, one and all.


source: http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm
And to think that when three years ago I've read somwhere that even higher educational system isn't teaching real history, nor law, nor economy, I found myself scratching my head and wondering "what could that possibly mean?". Well, scratching continues (although for slightly different reasons) - boy I hope I won't go bald too soon :O
 
"The United States Isn't a Country - It's a Corporation!"
by Lisa Guliani

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

"The Constitution for the united states of America".

The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

Capitalization - an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.
Also, what I found interesting is that the capitalization of words "IN GOD WE TRUST" that is "marked" on U.S. coins could very well be that "TO THE UNKNOWN GOD" that is referenced in KJV Acts 17:23.

http://www.cforc.com/kjv/Acts/17.html

17:22 Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.

17:23 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.

17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;17:23
It also reminds me of how preachers often "shout" when preaching the gospel. Perhaps, what makes the capitalized GOD (Yahweh?) "known" are the coins (con?) that he is engraved on that are stored in our BANKS (our temples)?

Now that's a scary thought.

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/666.htm

Q: (L) The other parts of chapter 13... Verse one says, "I stood on the sandy beach I saw a beast coming up out of the sea with ten horns and seven heads. On his horns he had ten royal crowns and blasphemous titles on his heads..." What does this verse mean?
A: Many meanings. Monetary control. 10 represents universal control of whole units of value.
Q: (L) So, the ten horns represent units of value, so we are talking about money here. What are the blasphemous titles on his heads?
A: In God we trust.
 
Of course the USA is a corporation to those whom it serves to be so. And the churches of the world are corporations to those benefiting from such distinctions. We all know the motives of the elite that has been trying to form the world in its own image for generations. It's all the same scam designed to corner people to admit that they are and have always been nothing but chattle for those who deem it so. And why? Because they say so.

I see those elite going to a lot of touble to convince people they are legally enslaved, just as the Christian churches with even more butal means defined slavery even at the soul level for its flock. Anyone who has read Machiavelli knows that he strongly advises the ruler avoid conflicts with the people. Conflict with the people is not in the rulers best interest because the ruler is always outnumbered. Better to con the people by making up a suitable to the rulers world view and conditioning the people to it.

And this conditioning has to periodically be renewed and change form because it is always temporary. And when you take out the old layer of rose-colored paint to slap on a new one what lies underneath will show. And the rulers know that this is risky business because the last thing they want is not so much that people throw off their old conditioning (they always have a new story for that), but that the people throw off their capacity to be conditioned. Then no new stories will work, and the rulers are in trouble.

The school bully usually picks on the weak and through them sets an example because he really doesn't want to be challenged. By having a history of picking on the weak all prospective challengers will remember that history any time they confront him, but will not focus on the fact that it was the weak the bully defeated. What they will focus upon is that all former condenders were defeated. And so the bully makes sure he defines the rules as inevitable and an image of himself that will keep people docile.

To defeat the bully it is not enough to stand up to him under the rules of his definition. One must alter his/her perspective of the bully, and then one must alter his/her attitude toward the bully. The purpose of this is to remove the magnifying lense the bully has placed in front of himself that makes him look larger than life.

We have been born and raised in a species-wide con-job, and sadly but understandably have become accustomed if not addicted to its trappings. Before we can be free of the bullies, or even make an attempt, we need to be free of their conditionings and discover our own rules based on what is right and true. These bullies have taught us about their laws, god's laws, nature's laws and clumped them all together in contrast to their correspondingly defined alternatives: chaos, violence, damnation...the abyss. This web of arbitrary definitions is the Matrix.

If we are to be free of the Matrix, we need to take the red pill, which is not a pill at all but a shift in perspective. Their rules attempt to control our relationships with each other, and even with ourselves. They seek to control our responses, which are predictable under their rules. We need to claim back our responses by making them responses to what is the way of things, not their conveniently defined versions. We need to understand ourselves and others, and the world view that will promote healthy and free responses because it is naturally compatible with who we are.

And we need to do this covertly, under the radar first until we are free from conditonability. We may be afraid, but courage is born in fear, and with it is born the conviction to be self-defined rather than con-job defined individuals. And as we become so we will witness the wonders of the non-linear domino effects such an awareness can trigger.
 
Back
Top Bottom