Tomatochip said:
I'm interested in exactly why you've judged Project Camelot to be a disinformation site? Laura also labelled them 'disinfo' in an email to me today.
Yes. Hopefully, you will decide to share Bill Ryan's response to you here. There's much to be gleaned from that Artful Dodge.
Tomatochip said:
What exactly is the falsehood?
In this case, first of all, Bill Ryan's reputation precedes him. Second, a number of the forum members and QFS members have checked out "Project Camelot." I don't have the exact data and quotes to hand, but if you want to examine anything in particular with a network, start a thread and let's do it!
Tomatochip said:
I have been an interested observer of their material since their inception, but I hold no agenda here, either for or against. I just observe and take in what seems to ring true.
We understand that. There was no offense meant by deactivating the link... just the usual housekeeping in the forum.
Tomatochip said:
And certainly not everything on their sight is in that category for me, But overall the Project Camelot material strikes me as quite neutral and very interesting... (I love Dan Burisch and Robert Dean)...
Dan Burisch and Robert Dean... don't know if they've been covered here on the forum or not, but we sure did some digging on them in QFS some time ago. Again, if there's nothing already here, let's have a look at them.
Tomatochip said:
simply presenting a forum for people talk and express their experiences, etc. in an uncolored, matter-of-fact way.
Well, in many instances, experiences can be misleading as most of us here have learned. There's a lot of "feel good" stuff out there that amounts to little more than junk-food for the mind/soul. Lots of calories, but no nutrition and may be toxic to your health.
Tomatochip said:
What is the foul in that?? It seems to me that in the PC 'Big Picture' and 'State of the World' summaries that they don't seem to push any particular agenda on their visitors but simply summarize what has been revealed in the sum total of their video and audio interviews leaving the visitor to make up their own mind. What I do like is that they have emphasized public involvement in changing the possible negative future events through consciousness change and belief modifications... all of which strikes me as good advice. Is there something important I am missing here? Why the ban???
Yeah... there is a LOT that you are missing here, but it will take too long to explain it all. Prolly best if you just continue to read and try to sort the wheat from the chaff. We don't ask for believers and we don't offer "experiences."
Edit: Added: After re-reading Bill Ryan's missive, I have published it here:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=49.msg86689#msg86689