Further to
my earlier posts in this thread about the pending Covid-19 case before the District Court of Leeuwarden, the Netherlands, against the puppets of the PTB, there has been a development in this matter. Yesterday, lawyer Peter Stassen gave a press conference in front of the courthouse, which can be found
here.
Basically, plaintiffs have submitted the expert witnesses' testimonies into the court proceedings independently, thereby evading the need for the court's permission for a hearing of the experts.
Keep in mind that lawyer Arno van Kessel, who initiated the proceedings on behalf of client Stichting Recht Oprecht, was thrown in jail in June of this year, while every 3 months his solitary confinement is prolonged by the authorities on charges of terrorism without one shred of evidence. The man has been disbarred, and can never practice law again as he has,
in his own words, been “financially broken by the state.” His co-counsel, Peter Stassen, now leads the cases.
Astoundingly, early this month, the judge ordered Van Kessel to remain in custody until the DA’s office has come up with their report and hearings can be planned, expected to take place in May 2026, and until at least February 2026, the public prosecutor argued, Van Kessel (and five other suspects) “should remain behind bars for the protection of Dutch society,
because these people have a deep-rooted conviction that the state must be overthrown” and “do not shy away from violence” in doing so.” Seems like a clear case of WrongThink to me!
Interestingly,
new evidence has come to light that the guy who anonymously tipped off the DA’s office that Van Kessel was a “terrorist,” was on a personal vendetta crusade against Van Kessel. A very convenient but super obvious useful idiot I’d say, given that the PTB are very worried about this case, so much so that they even murdered expert witness Prof. Dr. Francis Boyle earlier this year, as per the C’s in the session of 27th September 2025. Like in other countries, judges have basically been appointed on the basis of ideology, so it's possible that Van Kessel stays in the woods for some time to come.
Key Points of the Press Conference
* Announcement of the presentation of new, crucial evidence in two ongoing lawsuits against, among others, the State of the Netherlands,
Mark Rutte, Hugo de Jonge, Jaap van Dissel, Diederik Gommers,
Albert Bourla (Pfizer), and
Bill Gates.
* The cases concern damages caused by COVID-19 injections. The clients claim they were misled and would not have taken the shot without that deception.
* He places the case in a broader perspective: a global project called the “COVID-19 Great Reset,” in which the truth has deliberately been suppressed (he quotes Romans 1:18). Stassen says the injections are crucial to this project of depopulation, fertility reduction, and total control.
* New evidence (submitted on December 7):
*
Video messages and written expert reports from five experts: Sasha Latypova, Michael Yeadon, Joseph Sansone, Katherine Watt, and Catherine Austin Fitts.
* Main conclusions from these reports:
1. COVID-19 injections are
indistinguishable from a bioweapon.
2. They were developed and deployed as military “countermeasures” under Emergency Use Authorization (Operation Warp Speed), resorting under military legislation and not under regular pharmaceutical regulations.
3. Through mutual recognition between the FDA and EMA, the deception continues; in Europe, they are wrongly presented as a “vaccine.”
4. They offer no health benefits, are not safe, and not effective.
5. Harm (including heart failure, cancer, sudden death) is intentional by design.
6. They are part of a larger military depopulation and control system (Great Reset), in which
NATO plays a role [of which Mark Rutte is the current Chief].
* The defendants (except Bill Gates, whose lawyer referred to the court's judgment) don’t want to hear these experts and stick to the narrative of a “safe and effective vaccine.”
* The lawyer calls on the press to expose the suppression of the truth.
* Both cases (proceedings on the merits in Leeuwarden and appeal against the refusal to hear expert witnesses in Amsterdam) will have oral hearings in 2025. He expects that the judges can no longer ignore this evidence.
* All case documents and videos are publicly available via
www.rechtoprecht.nl and the foundation's YouTube channel; anyone may use them for their own proceedings.
* Financial support for the foundation is welcome, but even
more important is that more people file similar cases. [In this light, the
article up on SOTT about more and more people seeing through the lies and waking up comes to mind.]
Q&A Session (Main Points):
* No mandatory personal appearance of defendants; they can be represented by a lawyer.
* Bill Gates' lawyer was the only one who did not oppose hearing the experts (referred to the judge).
*
The evidence has now been submitted independently (videos and reports), without needing court permission for an expert hearing.
* The lawyer has been working alone since recently (after the departure of mr. Arno van Kessel), but feels supported by the foundation and volunteers.
* Oral hearing in the main proceedings likely between March and October 2025; further debate may be needed afterward.
* He acknowledges that proceedings can take a long time but emphasizes that
the fight for truth continues – both legally and “spiritually.”
* On questions about media attention: the foundation is working on promotion (compilation videos, social media); the limited attention is attributed to
control over the press as part of the “project.”
In this article you can find the links to the video presentations of the five experts, Catherine Austin Fitts, Joseph Sansone, Katherine Watt, Mike Yeadon, and Sasha Latypova:
De videoboodschappen, voorzien van Nederlandse ondertiteling, zijn middels linkjes in deze brief aan het Hof Amsterdam te downloaden.
www.ninefornews.nl
I saw some MSM in Holland reporting that the Dutch health institute reports a sharp decline in the uptake of the covid shot this year, especially in the 60 + category. Good, it seems indeed more and more people are waking up. like this
article on SOTT describes perfectly.
She also admitted she completely supports the 'inclusion' narrative (she is hook-line-sinker 'green agenda'). My thought was that she had no idea what 'inclusion' includes but said nothing. Her energy is difficult for me to deal with when she explodes.
