Conférence "Les changements terrestres et la connexion anthropocosmique"

Gandalf

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
You'll find below the invitation to a conference I will hold (in French) on Wednesday, November 21st in Paris. So far there about 50 attendees. Some seats are still available. The conference is organized by "Les Amis de la Radiesthésie".

How did it go @Pierre?
 

Pierre

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
How did it go @Pierre?

I think it went well, but I'm judge and jury here. Maybe the forum members that attended the conference will share their feedbacks.

In any case, we had about 60 attendees. About half the attendees who didn't read the book, bought it at the end of the conference. People seemed interested and asked very relevant questions. Unfortunately, we had to stopped the Q/A session because we had use all the allotted time (2h30).

I guess the organizers (Les Amis de la Radiesthésie) enjoyed the conference since they invited me to be the speaker of the conference they will organize in September in Southern France (Var). They also recommended me to another organization for which I will intervene during a conference in July in Western France.
 

Gandalf

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
I guess the organizers (Les Amis de la Radiesthésie) enjoyed the conference since they invited me to be the speaker of the conference they will organize in September in Southern France (Var). They also recommended me to another organization for which I will intervene during a conference in July in Western France.

Wow ! Great news and I am very happy for you and your book.

Go Pierre Go ! :clap:
 

Goemon_

Jedi Master
I found the conference well performed.
I had to be very focus to get to understand everything.
I read the book just after it was published and I had forget a lot.
There is some advantages to this form compared to reading the book. At least the fact that you have some explanations of graph and Pierre pointing at the graph at the same time. Of course there is more details in the book and so watching the conference and then reading the book would certainly be a good option to best understand the subject.
 

Learner

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Thank you for the update, Pierre! I wondered as well how it went. I am happy to hear, that there seems to be quite some interest in what you conveyed. Kudos about the great news! :thup:

And hopefully listeners will read on and educate themselves further (and will share their information further), as this is such an important topic.
 

Kisito

Jedi Council Member
I was really excited about going to Pierre's lecture. I had thought about it all week. I had procured the book in Kindle version in 2010, it took me several weeks to read it. And there, in 2 hours 30 of conference I understood many things. It's a really fascinating subject. It seemed too short, the time passed very quickly.
I had never seen Pierre before, his words are concise, he has a lot of humility, and he does not let himself be seduced by the compliments, and has enough humor not to take himself seriously. It is a very significant dialectic.
I then queued for Pierre to sign my book by. I told him that I had a little coffee, a coffee shop called "Cassiopée Café" in Montmartre, near the Sacré-Coeur. There are many artists and intellectuals and "specialists" in the climate. They speak "all" of the danger of CO2 caused by man ... These customers have sympathy for me, but they find me very strange and unthinking when I question anthropocosmic global warming. It's a job that has been going on for two years. I told Pierre that I had Laura's books, placed in some places in my library, he smiled and told me that I had disseminated them (disséminé), I accepted. He suggested I wear a helmet on his head :-D
I do not know if I managed to influence one person in two years?
But Peter in two hours had influenced the whole room, even the man who played the devil's advocate.
How much would it have influenced in two years?
Can we build something on this "Pierre-Stone-Kephas" ?

The fact remains that for two days Pierre's book has become an attraction.
A Parisian filmmaker laughed, saying he could adapt it to a disaster film.
Others have denigrated the book, some were angry, someone said "why not".
Some on the forum asked about November 21st ...
Can a video be effective?
Thank you for your work Pierre ... And thank you to Laura and all the team who have brought you to this path.
 

hesperides

Dagobah Resident
FOTCM Member
Seems like you didn´t leave anybody indiferent, Pierre, what a huge accomplishment from the get-go!

I had your conference in my mind these last days while wondering how it went and awaiting for your feedback. Your future as a truth discloser looks promising from the invitations you were offered, and the people interested in acquiring your book. I know it´s not an easy book to grasp, I had to read over and over several explanations as I wanted to get your point.

Unfortunately I live far away from France and there was no way I would have let slip by the opportunity of being part of the attendees. Maybe one day, if feasible, you´ll make a video for us here? :-)
 

Ellipse

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I think it went well, but I'm judge and jury here. Maybe the forum members that attended the conference will share their feedbacks.

Pierre you explain very well and show the link between the points very well so we see the big picture (it's the case to say that). With your explanations we see that the same forces are at work at very different scales and those forces are just physic!


The difficulties for Pierre is the time. You have to show that there is hard proofs of what you say to not appear as a nut, as you introduce concepts people have never heard before, but it took time. So You have to found the right equilibrium between the numbers of concepts you introduce, explanation of them and the credibility of the final picture you want people adhere. I 'm sure Pierre will adjust.

The remark that was made was that there is "the Human-Cosmic Connection" in the title of the conference so you have to mention it from the start because people come for the title. I was not here at the very beginning so I don't know if a plan of the conference, mentioning it, was given.

It's the difficulties, you have to explain the physic and a more esoteric part too in a short time. Perhaps, when possible, splitting the conference in two parts with an interval would be interesting for very interested audience?

Having myself a scientific background, I'm not the best to judge how Pierre explanations are received by people having other background, it would be interesting to know. For me it was super clear.

What I can add is that the guy behind me was saying "But what about the glaciers which are melting ?? What about the ice fields which are melting !??". Expected questions, so I think those points need to be addressed in advance without waiting for the questions/answers part.

Personally, I have a question for you Pierre: you mention that a brown dwarf cannot be detected by our current telescopes because their radiations are in the very low infrared if a remember well, so my question is: so how do we know that such objects exist? Is it only theoretical objects? I mention it because it struck me during the conference.
 

Goemon_

Jedi Master
Personally, I have a question for you Pierre: you mention that a brown dwarf cannot be detected by our current telescopes because their radiations are in the very low infrared if a remember well, so my question is: so how do we know that such objects exist? Is it only theoretical objects? I mention it because it struck me during the conference.

I think that the answer to your question was in the conference. I don't remember the exact details but what I get from this part of the conference is that the electric universe 'theory' would make sense of the existence of the second sun being around with a comet cluster. All the data that we get from the sun activities and the things we see happening on the planet can not been explain with the 'gravity theory'. Pierre adding that this doesn't mean that the 'gravity theory' is false but that it is not sufficient to explain the observations. So, we can't be sure that all what we see comes from a second sun but it is highly probable that it comes from an unknown object and we don't know about any other object. that is the gist of the mater as far as I recall the presentation.
 
Top Bottom