UK actress and TV personality Denise Welch talks about the national covid ‘scaremongering’ on This Morning.



‘....Basically, for five months now, we’ve had a rolling death count every day. We’ve never had one for the 500 people who die of cancer every day, we’ve never had one for the 180 people who die of heart disease every day or the 20 plus at the moment, who are dying of suicide every day...’

She is well informed and passionate but the presenters and resident show GP come across as utterly pathetic. Not surprisingly the video comments on YouTube were turned off!

After watching the interview, Piers Morgan, controversial and contemptible Good Morning Britain presenter took to Twitter where he called the former Waterloo Road actress ‘dangerous’.

‘Dumb, deluded & dangerous Covid-deniers like Denise Welch need to stop being given airtime,’ he penned reports the Metro, ‘Her idiotic, ill-informed ramblings – from a woman who never stops telling us that she suffers from mental illness – will cost lives by persuading people to think the virus isn’t a threat.’

Denise quickly fired back at Piers’ claims, writing: ‘Please ask Mr Morgan to show me one tweet, one interview where I have denied Covid?

Slowly but surely though more celebrities, who often have large followings on social media etc, are at least questioning the official narrative. Comedian John Bishop for example said last week:

"It seems risk assessments were made months ago when we knew significantly less than we do now and nothing has changed despite the correlation between infection and illness shifting.

"I am sure we will come out of it but I think that will happen sooner if we keep checking if what we are being asked to do makes sense."
 
UK actress and TV personality Denise Welch talks about the national covid ‘scaremongering’ on This Morning.

Denise Welch is pretty well known and generally liked in the UK, she's a presenter on the UK's popular TV program 'Loose Women' - i think it's a bit like the US' 'The View'. I was pretty surprised to see that mainstream media dared interview her calling out the lockdown and the coronavirus lies, and she does it pretty well, and they've been shared all over social media.

She's also not the only one. A copresenter of hers from the show (see video below) is saying similar things.

It's a good sign that people like her are getting such exposure and i think it speaks to a pushback that's building right now. It's probably just the beginning, and who knows where it'll go next but i hope this gives those out there questioning the official narrative some confidence in their thinking.

And they can smear her all they like but i think that may work against them; as will having the widely despised Tony Blair working for the other side pushing 'coronavirus IDs'.

To add to the picture, my mother messaged me a few weeks ago to tell me that her friends - rural/suburban working class folk (a number of who were in the army) - are increasingly sharing things on their Facebook profiles that are calling out, or at least questioning, the mainstream narrative.

Another clip also came out today of a known UK radio presenter cutting up a "scientifically useless" mask and saying that life needs to get back to normal:


 
UK actress and TV personality Denise Welch talks about the national covid ‘scaremongering’ on This Morning.



‘....Basically, for five months now, we’ve had a rolling death count every day. We’ve never had one for the 500 people who die of cancer every day, we’ve never had one for the 180 people who die of heart disease every day or the 20 plus at the moment, who are dying of suicide every day...’

She is well informed and passionate but the presenters and resident show GP come across as utterly pathetic. Not surprisingly the video comments on YouTube were turned off!

After watching the interview, Piers Morgan, controversial and contemptible Good Morning Britain presenter took to Twitter where he called the former Waterloo Road actress ‘dangerous’.

‘Dumb, deluded & dangerous Covid-deniers like Denise Welch need to stop being given airtime,’ he penned reports the Metro, ‘Her idiotic, ill-informed ramblings – from a woman who never stops telling us that she suffers from mental illness – will cost lives by persuading people to think the virus isn’t a threat.’

Denise quickly fired back at Piers’ claims, writing: ‘Please ask Mr Morgan to show me one tweet, one interview where I have denied Covid?

Slowly but surely though more celebrities, who often have large followings on social media etc, are at least questioning the official narrative. Comedian John Bishop for example said last week:

"It seems risk assessments were made months ago when we knew significantly less than we do now and nothing has changed despite the correlation between infection and illness shifting.

"I am sure we will come out of it but I think that will happen sooner if we keep checking if what we are being asked to do makes sense."

She was great, but those presenters were truly pathetic! Both had a patronizing attitude towards Denise, like she was a child. It's sad how most of the presenters on mainstream media today are like human shells or robots.
 
The thing for us to grasp about the vaccine issue is that for a large percentage of people the subject of its efficacy is going to be simply non debatable. The programming leads inexorably to that decision. The lock-downs, the masks, the crash of the economy, the perpetual and deliberately bewildering contradictions, are principally designed to make life so intolerable that the rainbow at the end of the unbearable tunnel is a vaccine that promises to instantly sweep aside all these unpleasant life choices and clean the slate, making you warm, virtuous and safe. This is the idea that people will completely invest in. It has been planted day one center stage as the only exit point to salvation. Any suggestion or information that threatens this crock of gold (sic) will be seen as an existential threat by the terrified populous and those who argue the same, anti-human and indeed of deserving of silencing by whatever means possible. The flock is being so bewildered, so terrorized, so intimidated, that the back of the cattle truck marked 'To Slaughter House' is thus perceived as the only safe place on earth and in they will rush. The rest of us can go to hell rather than allow us to close the door before they can get safely inside.
It's not just efficacy that's an issue here, either. In fact, it may not be the biggest issue, even if the public thinks a vaccine is the answer to all their prayers, because they're told.

The problem of "immune enhancement" is a subject that has come up recently, specifically in relation to Coronavirus vaccines. This is the reason they haven't been able to make a Coronavirus vaccine in the last 20 years! Believe me they tried - lots of profits to be made!

I'm beginning to wonder if something like this hasn't happened previously, maybe because of accidental contamination in other vaccines?

This is because they have to manufacture them on a live animal cell, so there's no telling what stuff is going to end up in the injection. Maybe even Coronavirus? It's a pretty universal bug.

Where can we look for this type of thing to have occured? Maybe in China? Perhaps Italy? After all, China started their mandatory adult vaccination campaign on 1st of December 2019. After that, they started having problems. Presumably will continue to force vaccines on people - perhaps the elites will get a pass?

Did we see people dropping dead in the streets after that, particularly if they were elderly? Yes we did. It looks like it started something.... :-( I can't help but think that they are overlooking a very big issue here.

If that's the case, then it may be possible that some people have been accidentally partially vaccinated against Coronavirus in contaminated flu shots. It could explain why some people drop dead shortly after the shot, or why some people have such serious complications from Coronavirus infections. If it wasn't for vaccines, maybe this 'pandemic' would have gone un-noticed?
 
It's not just efficacy that's an issue here, either. In fact, it may not be the biggest issue, even if the public thinks a vaccine is the answer to all their prayers, because they're told.

The problem of "immune enhancement" is a subject that has come up recently, specifically in relation to Coronavirus vaccines. This is the reason they haven't been able to make a Coronavirus vaccine in the last 20 years! Believe me they tried - lots of profits to be made!

I'm beginning to wonder if something like this hasn't happened previously, maybe because of accidental contamination in other vaccines?

This is because they have to manufacture them on a live animal cell, so there's no telling what stuff is going to end up in the injection. Maybe even Coronavirus? It's a pretty universal bug.

Where can we look for this type of thing to have occured? Maybe in China? Perhaps Italy? After all, China started their mandatory adult vaccination campaign on 1st of December 2019. After that, they started having problems. Presumably will continue to force vaccines on people - perhaps the elites will get a pass?

Did we see people dropping dead in the streets after that, particularly if they were elderly? Yes we did. It looks like it started something.... :-( I can't help but think that they are overlooking a very big issue here.

If that's the case, then it may be possible that some people have been accidentally partially vaccinated against Coronavirus in contaminated flu shots. It could explain why some people drop dead shortly after the shot, or why some people have such serious complications from Coronavirus infections. If it wasn't for vaccines, maybe this 'pandemic' would have gone un-noticed?
Thats Dr Lee Hieb Merritt, M.D. tentative hypothesis at the end of her talk during Doctors for Disaster Preparedness 38th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, on August 16 2020. The dramatic seeming deaths early on were likely from complications brought on by the virus interacting with a trial vaccine.

 
I thought it was worthwhile to mention this interesting interview with Gilad Atzmon, in which he talks about Jewish ID politics and the true meaning of drifting away from Athens and its ethos. Athens stands for the city of Western philosophy, science, poetry, ethics, tragedy, how to think for yourself, while Jerusalem stands for the Torah, for commandments, laws, to be dictated to what to say and what not to say.

At around 1:00 he says that covid19 makes no sense, it is a life setting based on fear. We are all being "Jerusalemized", "judified", subjects of the apocalyps philosophy. At 1:04:46 he says that if you wear a face mask, you identify with the religion of the orthodox Jews, with the commandments, the laws, the "do" and what to say and what not to say.

The global events since 9/11 have all been build like algorithms, computer models with projected calculations, f.i. global warming, 9/11, war on terror, islamism, etc. and now covid19. Robotization is in full swing. We are the most miserable people in human history. Fauci and Ferguson in the roles of the anti-scientific charlatans, like the rabbinical forces within the apocalyptic religion and now the scenario collapses because once again their predictive models fail to represent reality but they have managed to turn it into a cash machine.

With the thought police active on internet and everywhere, he says we are all facing the same persecution and the system as it exists is a fundamental sustaining of Jerusalem throughout history. This is the system implemented against Christ and Spinoza. For all who stand up against it, expect to be subjected to nasty measures, be ready to accept it. (The advice of the C's comes to mind to keep a low profile.)
He ends with saying that the tragedy is that we see a timeline of destruction and there is nothing we can do....

Indeed, let it flow its natural course, the grand cosmic cycle, and if we can survive so we can help those who ask and in the meantime enjoy life as well as you can and a great help in this are the Romance novels, i just started my first!

 
In today's online paper:
Two-thirds of Americans say they won’t get COVID-19 vaccine when it’s first available

Two-thirds of U.S. voters say they won’t try to get a coronavirus vaccine as soon as it becomes available and one in four say they don’t want to get it ever, according to a new USA TODAY/Suffolk poll released the same week that the number of COVID-19 cases surpassed 6 million.

“I don’t plan on being anyone’s guinea pig,” Ebony Dew, an independent from Capitol Heights, Maryland, said. “I don’t plan on getting it at all.”

The 40-year-old access control specialist questions the safety of a potential vaccine, echoing concerns shared by millions of Americans.

“I feel like their testing is a trial and error,” Dew said. “And I also feel that they don’t really know all that much about this virus, so how can they create a cure for it just yet?”

The poll of 1,000 voters follows similar surveys conducted in the past month that indicate as many as one third of Americans would decline a vaccine, fueled by mistrust of the Trump administration’s push to speed up its development as well as a sizable slice of the country that generally oppose immunizations of any kind.

President Donald Trump has been promoting Operation Warp Speed, a multi-agency initiative to expedite rapid production of COVID-19 tests, treatments and vaccines. Its goal is to produce and deliver 300 million doses of vaccine by January. Three vaccine candidates are in Phase 3 trials in the United States, and more are expected to enter Phase 3 trials by the end of September, according to Alex Azar, secretary of Health and Human Services.

Experts say the level of public resistance to an immunization against a virus that has already killed more than 185,000 Americans is concerning because it undermines the utility of the vaccine.

“If you have 330 million doses of vaccine and nobody wants it, it accomplishes nothing. You’ve got to use the vaccine. It’s just as important as how effective the vaccine is,” said Dr. David Salmon, a professor at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University and an expert in global disease epidemiology and control.

“You probably need between 70 and 80% of the population to get immune in order to really control COVID,” he said. “And when I say immune, I mean both get the vaccine and the vaccine worked for them.”

The USA TODAY/Suffolk poll found that about two-thirds of the 1,000 voters surveyed – 67% – would either not take the vaccine until others have tried it (44%) or not take it at all (23%)

The other third of respondents were split between those who said they would take the vaccine as soon as it’s available (27%) or those who were undecided (6%). Those 75 and older were by far the likeliest to say they will get the vaccine right away.

The poll, taken Aug. 28-31, surveyed registered voters by cell phone and landline and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

Democrats (86%) are more likely than Republicans (61%) to get the vaccine at some point. Men and women were evenly split but the youngest respondents (those under 24) and the oldest (those 75 and older) were the likeliest to get the vaccine either right away or after seeing how the initial immunizations went.

Hispanic voters (17%) and Black voters (15%) are less willing than white voters (31%) to take the vaccine as soon as it became available, according to the poll. The survey found that both groups also were likelier not to take the vaccine at all, compared to whites.

Some experts say that voters of color will need to be reassured about the vaccine due to often being treated poorly by those in the medical field.
[...]

Forty-one percent of those surveyed would not get the coronavirus vaccine if the federal government mandated it versus 50% of those who said they would.

Dozens of doctors, nurses and health officials interviewed by Kaiser Health News and The Associated Press expressed concern about the country’s readiness to conduct mass vaccinations, as well as frustration with months of inconsistent information from the federal government.

The gaps include figuring out how officials will keep track of who has gotten which doses and how they’ll keep the workers who give the shots safe with enough protective gear and syringes to do their jobs.

David Brockman, an independent voter from Columbus, Indiana, would “consider” getting the vaccine, but would be further put off if he was mandated by the government to get it.

“If they’re forcing me to get something like that, it makes me think more that there’s something behind it,” he said.

As for the vaccine itself, Brockman is still unsure if he can trust it. “I just don’t know if that would be something that right away I would just like stick my arm out and say ’hey, oh yeah. Give it to me.”

Scientists have also voiced concern over the readiness of the vaccine, worried that pressure from Trump ahead of the Nov. 3 election might lead the FDA to approve the vaccine before it is fully tested.

Concern over political pressure comes after the Food and Drug Administration claimed blood plasma reduced deaths in coronavirus patients by 35% as justification for issuing an Emergency Use Authorization for plasma – another treatment the president has said is promising.

However, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said he’s confident that the experts in charge of the vaccine will not be swayed by politics.

Previously reported:
CDC tells states: Be ready to distribute vaccines on Nov. 1
The timeline raised concern among public health experts about an “October surprise” — a vaccine approval driven by political considerations ahead of a presidential election, rather than science.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — The federal government has told states to prepare for a coronavirus vaccine to be ready to distribute by Nov. 1.

The timeline raised concern among public health experts about an “October surprise” — a vaccine approval driven by political considerations ahead of a presidential election, rather than science.

In a letter to governors dated Aug. 27, Robert Redfield, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said states “in the near future” will receive permit applications from McKesson Corp., which has contracted with CDC to distribute vaccines to places including state and local health departments and hospitals.

“CDC urgently requests your assistance in expediting applications for these distribution facilities and, if necessary, asks that you consider waiving requirements that would prevent these facilities from becoming fully operational by November 1, 2020,” Redfield wrote.

He wrote that any waivers will not compromise the safety or effectiveness of the vaccine. The Associated Press obtained the letter, which was first reported by McClatchy.

Redfield told Yahoo Finance that officials were preparing “for what I anticipate will be reality, is that there’ll be one or more vaccines available for us in November, December.”

James S. Blumenstock, a senior vice president at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, said the CDC was offering “an aggressive but necessary timetable” but that public health agencies were mobilizing to prepare detailed plans.

Several vaccine and public health experts pointed out that final stage trials of experimental vaccines are still recruiting, and are at best halfway through that process. The vaccines are two doses, and each is given a month apart. Several experts told the AP they did not understand how there could be adequate data on whether the vaccines work and are safe before Nov. 1.

“Being ready is reasonable. Cutting short phase 3 trials before you get the information you need isn’t,” said Dr. Paul Offit, a Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia immunization expert who sits on the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee.

Peter Hotez, dean of Baylor University’s tropical medicine school, said he was “very concerned” about whether the Food and Drug Administration would use an emergency use authorization to approve a vaccine before knowing whether it works and is safe.

“It gives the appearance of a stunt rather than an expression of public health concern,” Hotez said

Michael Osterholm, a University of Minnesota infectious disease expert, said he was concerned about an “October surprise” with a vaccine being rushed through ahead of the election.

“The public health community wants a safe and effective vaccine as much as anybody could want it,” Osterholm said. “But the data have to be clear and compelling, that the vaccine is effective and that it’s safe.”

He said there was a “credibility gap” between doctors and the FDA about how rigorous products are being evaluated during the pandemic.

Full story:
FDA could approve vaccine before completion of Phase Three trials
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is willing to provide “emergency use authorization” for use of a vaccine before Phase Three clinical trials are complete, FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn says. Hahn told The Financial Times that if a vaccine developer applies before concluding the crucial testing phase – involving tens of thousands of patients – the FDA might find authorization “appropriate.”

Multiple drug companies have begun Phase Three testing, but results are not expected before October or November. Former FDA chief Scott Gottlieb said Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation” that the authorization could allow use of the vaccine for high-risk populations.

“Full approval for the general population, where people can go to CVS and get a shot, that’s really a 2021 event,” Gottlieb said. “Maybe the first quarter of 2021, probably more likely the first half.”

Warp speed indeed!
 
According to WITS website (World integrated trade solution, which is a trade software provided by the World Bank for users to query several international trade databases.), basically every country in the world has been buying COVID-19 PCR test kits well before the plandemic. The link for 2018 arrived to my inbox from a friend. I checked other years too. There is no data for 2020, naturally, neither for 2016 but since 2017 the numbers are there, very similar and slightly rising each year, trading value in billions USD for many Western countries and in hundreds of millions for the rest of the so called developed world. EU is included in the list at the top while the EU member states have also been buying individually. Does EU have a private stock? 🤔.

I would not be surprised if countries were buying just some PCR tests but COVID-19 test kits? In 2017? I don't know what to make of it. The source is legit but maybe I am reading it wrong. Anyone?

Here are the links:
2017
2018
2019

This screenshot is from the top of 2017 table:

WITS.jpg
 
Thats Dr Lee Hieb Merritt, M.D. tentative hypothesis at the end of her talk during Doctors for Disaster Preparedness 38th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, on August 16 2020.
The very end [can't seem to get a screenshot]:

THANK YOU
WWG1WGA
superimposed over
Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin
 
Sorry for accidentally posting unfinished post. Here is the full text:

This article by Serbian author Vladimir Dimitrijević, originally published on Srbin.info, falls into 'Science of the spirit' category. Nicely written and explained what damage the masks really bring on spiritual level. I have been trying to figure out how to fight this mandatory mask-wearing business since in Czech they are bringing it back on a large scale, starting September 9th. Not outside and not in pubs and bars yet but pretty much everywhere else. Shops, services, public transport etc. I hope that many people are sick of it by now and the protest in form of not wearing will grow, along with demonstrations otherwise the government will really make us sheep.

Masks in schools – psychological consequences
August 20, 2020

The fight against the corona virus is triggering more and more strange types of official anti-pandemic propaganda, which constantly (re) emphasize “social distance”, and the authorities recommend that we be as far away from loved ones as possible, so as not to infect them.

Pupils should go to school with masks on their faces, and educators must also be masked. However, the psychological consequences of wearing masks are not small. Especially for children and young people.


Depersonalization

Clinical psychologist Sofija Trivunac, who had a practice in the West for four decades (she received her doctorate in the USA), points out the seriousness of these consequences in an interview with “Pečat” (August 14, 2020). Emphasizing the small benefit of masks (not counting serious medical masks, which are generally not available to ordinary people) in protection against diseases, she says: “This is a direct act of subordination and learning for children to obey, not to communicate, not to have a face. And when the baby is born and until it speaks, it, like the primates, needs that basic image of the face – a smile and eyes, and now they are already announcing glasses. So, they “abolish” our eyes and mouths as the two biggest communication channels that man has to man and man to animals. Suddenly, we came to the situation that the one who does not wear a mask is marked as a transmitter of infection or someone who is a bully, someone who resists. /… / I do not want the pathology of compulsive-obsessive people to become ruling and this crown to become normal for us.

Of course, the pandemic needs to be fought. But that struggle must not neglect the psychological consequences of the state of emergency. Sofija Trivunac points out: “If we look at the human body as a receiver that is loaded, or” unclean “, or blocked for a long period of time, its immunity is seriously weakened and it is not able to energetically” digest “all those fears. One of the great generators of fear is the uncertainty to which we are also exposed for a long period of time, and all that leads us first to mental disorders and then to physical illness. Because when the brain that controls our psyche and our body gets sick, our other organs gradually get sick and the outcomes are mostly difficult and extremely dangerous. “

Masking introduces both students and educators to a twisted world, the world of “Alice behind the mirror”, in which there will be neither real education nor basic socialization. But the biggest blow was made to the essence of interpersonal relationships – love.



The secret of love as the basis of humanity

In his book “Praises to Meaning”, the writer Dusko Jevtovic writes: “In one maternity hospital, two twins, born prematurely, were placed in separate incubators, as required by regulations. One of their lives was in danger. The nurse on duty put them in the same incubator, and when she visited them after a while, she realized that a miracle had happened: she found them embracing! The stronger twin sister hugged the weaker one, whose condition suddenly changes for the better from that moment! As if she had gained the will to live, which she missed, the weaker sister began to breathe evenly, her heart beating in the rhythm of the heart of the sister whose love had strengthened her. Precision devices registered everything. A colleague of mine also printed an article that ended with a photo of a saving hug.

When Kiri, “it was written,” felt that she was near her sister and that her sister was fighting for her life, she hugged her little sister in order to support her in that fight. From that moment, Brijela began to breathe normally, her heartbeat returned to normal and her health began to stabilize. The doctors decided to keep the babies together because when they were together they kept each other alive. ” This is, one might say, scientific proof of the healing properties of love. Because the heart is more sensitive than any device. The feeling of love protects better than protective glass and penetrates deeper than cables and tubes. With the impulse of eternity, it starts the bloodstream and with the warmth of the embrace releases hope from the armor of frozen indifference, that circle of death. “

So, in the fight against physical illness, we must not get sick mentally and socially. Health is psychophysical totality and wholeness, and not a one-dimensional absence of physical illness. We must take special care of that when it comes to our children. They are the future, aren’t they?
 
For a bit of a light hearted moment, some clever person has edited a few of Victoria's police commissioners news releases to make it sound as though he is in support of protests! :lol:


I haven't yet seen any live streams of the protests in Melbourne and wonder if they are getting censored. There are plenty of live streams from Brisbane and Sydney. The Brisbane ones that I've seen there is no police action, but they are being led by a new political party called the 'Informed Medical Opinion Party' who have apparently managed to bring together 23 candidates for the next election, 13 of whom spoke at the protest.

Here is a general video of the crowd at the Brisbane protest:


From Sydney, Victor Tee, who started protesting under the banner 'Exercising My Rights' earlier in the year has some comprehensive video's of the Sydney protests. It's clear from his video's that where there was police action, the police were the aggressors.

In part one, Victor shows the activity around one of the two fines he received on the day:

18:33

In part two, he shows more of the action of the protest and how the police attempt to corral the crowd into smaller and smaller area's.

1:06:50

The police have so many camera's on their actions at these protests that I think they are going to have a lot of trouble defending any legal action that comes their way.
 
Just saw this and I'm flabbergasted:
In Ohio on Monday the state’s governor Mike Dewine passed an order that creates FEMA camps to isolate COVID contaminated people:

The above from article:
NEW WORLD ORDER: Australia Begins Arresting Citizens Posting Non-Approved COVID Talking Points – Ohio Passes Order to Create Corona Shelters – Dr. Fauci Claims Sky Is Falling

Link to the Aug. 31 health order pdf:

This is legit as I found it on the Ohio Dept of Health website on the Public Health Orders page. It is an order by the Interim Director rather than the governor. Scroll down - it's under the Ohio Department of Health section just below the Governor DeWine section:
This is starting to feel very ominous and it should be noted that this order took effect immediately and expires in ninety days or at a time to be determined by the Director of Health, whichever is sooner. That takes this order well into November and one cannot ignore the political implications inherent in this!
 
From the twitter in previous post:

EhD6CTmXkAAa6hJ
 
Another link from previous twitter regarding the Aug. 31 Ohio health order:

Skip to 20 min if you just want the calls made to the Department of Health

In this video I review the second amended order for Non-Congregate Sheltering signed by Lance D. Himes, Interim Director of Health August 31, 2020 rather abruptly and in the middle of the night. Essentially this establishes Isolation Centers for Covid19 be available to quarantine individuals who can not do so safely where they are. They say it is completely voluntary.

I however located a document entitled "Ohio Department of Health Limitations on Movement and Infection Control Practices Version 3.0" off of the Ohio Department of Health Website. This document was released July of 2011. On page 20, Sec V it clearly states "Alternative arrangements may need to be available for those who cannot or will not comply with voluntary home-based quarantine." It even mentions Detention Centers specifically.

I contacted the Department of Health multiple times but was only able to reach a corona virus hotline. All other attempts to contact any individual who could provide me more information failed because the "pandemic" is causing them to not be in the offices. I include the phone calls in this clip. It is perfectly legal to record phone calls where I am and it is my belief that this information is in the public interest.

Non-Congregate Shelter Order https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/...
Limitations on Movement and Infection Control Practices https://odh.ohio.gov/wps/wcm/connect/....
:shock:
 
Back
Top Bottom