Various interesting things regarding Canada

Free tampons and menstrual pads now required in Canadian government-controlled men's restrooms​

1. i reacted to the above post with the comment "how stupid can you get?".
2. to this, tuatha de danaan replied with 😡.
3. there is an ambiguity: was his smily addressed to the stupidity of the canadina gov, or was it that he found my comment stupid??
 
heinrich said:

Free tampons and menstrual pads now required in Canadian government-controlled men's restrooms​

1. i reacted to the above post with the comment "how stupid can you get?".
2. to this, tuatha de danaan replied with 😡.
3. there is an ambiguity: was his smily addressed to the stupidity of the canadina gov, or was it that he found my comment stupid??
Click to expand...
I'll take a wild guess, number 3 the former option.
 
heinrich said:
ok, so i keep my option that the canadian gow is stupid. i had this confirmed on previous trips to canada.
Click to expand...
I would rather say that the Canadian government is deeply corrupted and gone full Woke. It's Trudeau's father who sold Canada to the globalists. From there it only went downhill. The tampons and menstrual pads BS is a political agenda pro Woke/pro Trans, and it probably has to do with the fact that some women pretend to be men: if they did not have a complete surgery to remove their inner parts, they will "cycle" every month... Thus the need to place feminine hygiene products in men's bathrooms. But yeah, overall, it's quite stupid.

Apart from that, I'll raise this question: why do they get free hygiene products exactly? Why would the government cover those costs? Aren't these employees paid a well enough salary to buy their own things?

On another Trans topic, my daughter's circus class teacher is a man who transitioned into a woman. Long hair, woman's name, breast implants, earrings, makeup, etc. A very sweet, kind, generous person, and passionate about teaching. I have nothing bad to say about him. The problem is me: I can't see him as a woman. I can only see a man pretending to be a woman. So I'm always walking on eggshells when I speak; I must be very careful with wording not to betray my own beliefs while avoiding disrespect toward him. So I always phrase with neutral words (I never use feminine or masculine, try that when talking in French, it's quite something lol).
Today, I slipped when talking to my son, but no one heard me except a 10 years old little girl who was going to the bathroom while the rest of the class was busy doing a demonstration. She heard me say: "regarde le monsieur!" which means look at the man/gentleman. She stopped and reprimanded me: "Uh, she is a lady" (c'est une dame)
I was really itching to reply her... But I hold back.
So, all this to ask, is it just me who finds something deeply disturbing and wrong about children being indoctrinated that way? Does this little girl really believe it's a woman??? Or does she know it's a man, but pretends it's a woman because she's been told it's a woman?
The damage this is going to do to our society is gruesome.
 
I read this Substack article on recommendation from John Carter's "Postcards from Barsoom" Substack. It's a fictionalized account of what an average Canadian can experience these days in Canada. I can attest to having had some of these experiences as well.
fortissax.substack.com

The Great Canadian Darkness

Average Day in Canada
fortissax.substack.com fortissax.substack.com

Quote from the author:
Almost every single experience here from the reader’s perspective is, unfortunately, a real-world anecdote that I’ve personally witnessed living in Canada. Reality is stranger than fiction.
Click to expand...
 
meadow_wind said:
On another Trans topic, my daughter's circus class teacher is a man who transitioned into a woman. Long hair, woman's name, breast implants, earrings, makeup, etc. A very sweet, kind, generous person, and passionate about teaching. I have nothing bad to say about him. The problem is me: I can't see him as a woman. I can only see a man pretending to be a woman. So I'm always walking on eggshells when I speak; I must be very careful with wording not to betray my own beliefs while avoiding disrespect toward him. So I always phrase with neutral words (I never use feminine or masculine, try that when talking in French, it's quite something lol).
Today, I slipped when talking to my son, but no one heard me except a 10 years old little girl who was going to the bathroom while the rest of the class was busy doing a demonstration. She heard me say: "regarde le monsieur!" which means look at the man/gentleman. She stopped and reprimanded me: "Uh, she is a lady" (c'est une dame)
I was really itching to reply her... But I hold back.
So, all this to ask, is it just me who finds something deeply disturbing and wrong about children being indoctrinated that way? Does this little girl really believe it's a woman??? Or does she know it's a man, but pretends it's a woman because she's been told it's a woman?
The damage this is going to do to our society is gruesome.
Click to expand...
It's a tough situation. Trying to balance external consideration against telling the truth about the situation. There's also the problem of saying the "wrong thing" in public these days. A close environment like a school where word gets around, could cause issues for you or your kids later on.

On the other hand, it might be a good lesson for the young girl to hear that adults can have different opinions, while still being calm and respectful. It's obvious she's been indoctrinated or influenced by gender cult ideology, probably from her parents or the school system. So, simply stating the reality that the teacher is a man could be seen as service to the truth for the girl.

However, when you factor in external consideration for the participants and your strategic enclosure for you and your kids within the system, speaking up would have probably done more harm than good.

I found it interesting that your automatic reaction to tell your son "regarde le monsieur!" shows that the pattern recognition part of your brain was working correctly. Even though the man presented in every way as a "woman", your first instinct was in line with reality.

Were you aware when your daughter signed up for the circus class that it would be taught by a trans person, and if you had known beforehand could she have taken a different class?

Perhaps the simplest way to avoid awkward and potentially dangerous situations like this, while still remaining aligned with the truth, is to try and find courses and activities taught by people who are not under the spell of the gender cultists.
 
Timótheos said:
I found it interesting that your automatic reaction to tell your son "regarde le monsieur!" shows that the pattern recognition part of your brain was working correctly. Even though the man presented in every way as a "woman", your first instinct was in line with reality.
Click to expand...
The best way would have been to say: "look at the teacher / regarde le professeur", in which case I would not have betrayed the truth nor been disrespectful. It's usually how I do it, but I was a little tired that day, so I "slipped"

Timótheos said:
Were you aware when your daughter signed up for the circus class that it would be taught by a trans person, and if you had known beforehand could she have taken a different class?
Click to expand...
We already knew him because he's also teaching at National Circus School, where she took her classes last year and last fall.

This other place, I knew he was teaching there before registering because I wrote to that place beforehand to get some info regarding the classes, and he's the one who replied to me personally. I need to say I was impressed with the time and care he took in his response. He's genuinely caring toward people.

There are only 3 places to do aerial circus in Montreal and it's almost always fully booked. The 3rd place is a little more expensive, closer to my home, and he does not teach there. But it's also a different teaching approach.

Timótheos said:
speaking up would have probably done more harm than good
Click to expand...
Oh yeah... The first thing that came to my mind was that she would go blurt that out to her parents and/or the teacher, then who knows what type of snowball effect it would do.
I also considered simply saying: "Maybe you should go ask your parents to have a discussion about this with you."
 
Is it a psychological warfare against Canadians?

Trudeau Government Offers Free Access To National Parks For Migrants Only​

Other Canadians will continue to pay $151.25 for a season’s pass for up to seven family members or $75.25 for an individual season’s pass that is good for any federally owned park. A day pass for what is perhaps the best-known national park in Canada – in Banff, AB – is $11 a day.
Click to expand...
thepostmillennial.com

Trudeau government offers free access to national parks for migrants only

“Free admission for newcomers to Canada and new Canadian citizens” in 2024.
thepostmillennial.com thepostmillennial.com
 
unkl brws said:
I read this Substack article on recommendation from John Carter's "Postcards from Barsoom" Substack. It's a fictionalized account of what an average Canadian can experience these days in Canada. I can attest to having had some of these experiences as well.
fortissax.substack.com

The Great Canadian Darkness

Average Day in Canada
fortissax.substack.com fortissax.substack.com

Quote from the author:
Click to expand...
what a read... reads like a sinking of civilisation. poor new world...
 
Here's an interesting thing regarding Canada:

Largest private landowners in the world

Canada is made up of 89% crown land which is technically owned by the Crown, but acts as public land and is purely symbolic. The British Crown does still own a large portfolio of real estate called Crown Estate.
Click to expand...
Is it though, "purely symbolic"?

What I see over and over with Canadian foreign policy is complete 'lockstep' with the British government. With the US too, to a great extent, but much of the nonsense Trudeau has pulled off in Canada, Americans would never stand for.

Canada may be superficially independent, but it is still effectively a colony, heavily influenced in all significant policy decisions by what is now an Anglo-American ‘deep state’. The very fact that it ‘won its independence’ through a British Act of Parliament, and not a revolution, makes Canada independent de jure, but de facto?

Incidentally, 'Canada' became such in 1867, right after the US Civil War, when the British had used what was then called British North America to funnel weapons to the Confederates and fuel the US civil war, ideally to thwart the USA's rise as a global rival. So 'independence' was granted in part as a 'reward for good behavior' on behalf of master in London, England, and in part as a move to stave off republicanism and ensure that the newly minted 'Canada' would remain loyal to the British empire as a colony.

Joined at the hip with London at the time of its founding via secret societies like the fundamentalist 'christian' (actually, pedophilic/satanic and zealously, politically loyal to the British Empire) Orange Order, of which FOUR of Canada's prime ministers were members, today it remains joined at the hip via the ‘Five Eyes’ anglosphere intelligence cult.

Canada’s extreme Covid/vaccine policies - and subsequent authoritarian crackdown against the Freedom Convoy - were social experiments devised by this imperial network. Canada was also used by the British-Canadian intelligence agencies to shelter, and later expand, the Ukrainian Nazi network after WW2, for use, as we see today, against Russia.
 
Niall said:
Canada may be superficially independent, but it is still effectively a colony,
Click to expand...
You are quite right about this. We still pay dividends to the Royal Family.

How much does the monarchy cost Canadian taxpayers?
While Canada might not pay money directly to the monarchy, the country's ties to the House of Windsor(opens in a new tab) could cost taxpayers more than $58.7 million annually.
That's according to the Monarchist League of Canada(opens in a new tab), which calculated the figure for the 2019-2020 fiscal year based on costs such as maintaining historic buildings, running the Governor General's office, and covering travel-related expenses for visiting royals like security for Prince Harry and Meghan(opens in a new tab). The pro-monarchy group says the total represents $1.55 per Canadian.


If people are interested in seeing how Canada was at the time of the fur trade when the Red Coats took over (Britain), there is a TV show named Frontier on Netflix, starring Jason Momoa. The British Hudson Bay cie just took everything for themselves under some business contract in the name of the crown.

If you are more into Romance, there is Marguerite Volant which was a big production made in Quebec. That one is also an historical fiction, and I must say Captain Chase is very handsome... 😁

You can also win a crown land. No joke! If you like to live in the middle of nowhere, eaten alive by millions of black flies and horse flies during the summer, and buried under 10ft of snow in the winter...

Territoire public - Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
Quebec Public territory
Resort land draw

Description
State lands cover more than 90% of Quebec territory. The Government of Quebec is responsible for these lands of varying sizes found throughout the province, whether in the city, in the suburbs, in rural areas or in the forest.
The government's objective is to make these lands more accessible and attractive, particularly for vacationers. This is why it is implementing various ways to facilitate its use, rental and in some cases, purchase.
In this context, each fall, you can obtain rental vacation land by participating in a draw conducted by the Quebec government in collaboration with SÉPAQ.
The interactive map illustrates the land offered by lottery as well as the location of the leases in force. Descriptive sheets are also available to specify the rental conditions of the land offered.


Maybe you prefer Ontario?
Comment profiter des terres de la Couronne de l’Ontario
Crown land represents 77% of Ontario's total land area and is managed under the province's Public Lands Act. These vast territories are accessible to all free of charge, although the designated use of the territory must be respected, depending on the sector.
Little of this land is found in southern and eastern Ontario, due to population density and urban development. However, in the north of the province, Crown lands represent 95% of the area of the region.
According to Margie Kenedy, an experienced camper, Crown lands are less busy than other spaces, such as provincial parks, since they are more difficult to find.
The first time I tried to use the Atlas, I was lost. It seems like it was created to prevent people from using it, it’s so difficult to navigate, explains the woman who documents her stays on Crown land in a blog.
The Ontario Crown Lands Atlas (New window) is a research tool that helps identify where Crown lands are located, as well as the use assigned to them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom