Yahoo News - New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No 757 @ Pentagon

C

CB_Brooklyn

Guest
New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

excerpt:
"The study was signed by fifteen professional pilots with extensive military and commercial carrier experience."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20070621/bs_prweb/prweb534642_1


=============================================================


Donald Rumsfeld says missile damaged the Pentagon and "similar" damaged the WTC

quote:
"Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center."

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3845
 
Looks like this was posted about a week ago here. Perhaps the Rumsfeld quote should be added as a comment, though.
 
Not surprisingly, the yahoo news link is no longer valid, and I was unable to find the article by doing a search. Does anyone know of a mirror to this story?

Thanks,
Jason in Wyoming
 
ocean59 said:
Not surprisingly, the yahoo news link is no longer valid, and I was unable to find the article by doing a search. Does anyone know of a mirror to this story?

Thanks,
Jason in Wyoming
Rick linked to where the entire article, as it was originally published, can be found - the SotT page!

here -

http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/articles/show/135526-New+study+from+Pilots+for+9-11+Truth%3A+No+Boeing+757+hit+the+Pentagon

One of the reasons we work so hard to get so many various stories into the database is so that we have a copy when/if they get purged from mainstream sources.
 
anart said:
One of the reasons we work so hard to get so many various stories into the database is so that we have a copy when/if they get purged from mainstream sources.
and what a great 'Matrix-Heat thermometer' we have - the more quickly and completely a story disappears, the more 'hot' it must have been. :cool:
 
sleepyvinny said:
and what a great 'Matrix-Heat thermometer' we have - the more quickly and completely a story disappears, the more 'hot' it must have been. :cool:
And we sure do notice how much COINTELPRO has been activated against the Pentagon issue. That is the BIG "sore toe" of the PTB. Step on that one, and you stir up a hornet's nest as we have seen. You can almost guage who is and who is NOT an "agent" (conscious or otherwise), by who thinks that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon and who knows that it just didn't happen the way they said it did.
 
Yes, that makes it really easy to tell. When I come across something on 911 I haven't seen before I just scan to the Pentagon part.

Laura said:
And we sure do notice how much COINTELPRO has been activated against the Pentagon issue. That is the BIG "sore toe" of the PTB. Step on that one, and you stir up a hornet's nest as we have seen. You can almost guage who is and who is NOT an "agent" (conscious or otherwise), by who thinks that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon and who knows that it just didn't happen the way they said it did.
 
A couple things about the FDR.....

1. It's government supplied data so it proves nothing.

2. The NTSB produced animation contradicts the physical damage but is NOT accurate in regards to the values depicted in the FDR . This is further evidence that it has been falsified.

3. PFT made an animation based off the actual values from the FDR and and it contradicts the eyewitnesses AND the physical damage further supporting the notion that it was falsified.

Here is a link to PFT's most recent animation:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3752900324142560520&hl=en
 
Back
Top Bottom