US Hegemony and Its Perils - China's Charge Sheets - Feb 2023

Michael B-C

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
On 20th February, the Chinese Government, via its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, published four pretty astonishing - certainly astonishingly blunt - position papers, three of which come across as opening statements for the prosecution of US History and Cultural imposition upon the world ever since its founding.

These are:

US Hegemony and Its Perils

Drug Abuse in the United States

Gun Violence in the United States: Truth and Facts

The fourth paper, is by way of a counter argument to the US stance of our rules or the highway, and outlines an approach to international relations based on co-operation, respect and non-intrusion into the internal affairs of other states.

The Global Security Initiative Concept Paper

I will post here in its entirety only the first, because whatever your view of the Chinese, this is a pretty conclusive indictment and shows in its language and content that the gloves have well and truly come off and any pretense at friendly relations has just gone up in smoke.

Perhaps one day historians will refer to this document as the first salvo in the US-Chinese estrangement and even perhaps war.

Heaven knows if US power structures will comment on this or attempt a riposte or whatever, but I'm sure they have read it and I'm certain they will be incandescent.


US Hegemony and Its Perils

2023-02-20 16:28



Contents

Introduction

I. Political Hegemony—Throwing Its Weight Around

II. Military Hegemony—Wanton Use of Force

III. Economic Hegemony—Looting and Exploitation

IV. Technological Hegemony—Monopoly and Suppression

V. Cultural Hegemony—Spreading False Narratives

Conclusion



Introduction

Since becoming the world's most powerful country after the two world wars and the Cold War, the United States has acted more boldly to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, pursue, maintain and abuse hegemony, advance subversion and infiltration, and willfully wage wars, bringing harm to the international community.

The United States has developed a hegemonic playbook to stage "color revolutions," instigate regional disputes, and even directly launch wars under the guise of promoting democracy, freedom and human rights. Clinging to the Cold War mentality, the United States has ramped up bloc politics and stoked conflict and confrontation. It has overstretched the concept of national security, abused export controls and forced unilateral sanctions upon others. It has taken a selective approach to international law and rules, utilizing or discarding them as it sees fit, and has sought to impose rules that serve its own interests in the name of upholding a "rules-based international order."

This report, by presenting the relevant facts, seeks to expose the U.S. abuse of hegemony in the political, military, economic, financial, technological and cultural fields, and to draw greater international attention to the perils of the U.S. practices to world peace and stability and the well-being of all peoples.

I. Political Hegemony -- Throwing Its Weight Around

The United States has long been attempting to mold other countries and the world order with its own values and political system in the name of promoting democracy and human rights.

◆ Instances of U.S. interference in other countries' internal affairs abound. In the name of "promoting democracy," the United States practiced a "Neo-Monroe Doctrine" in Latin America, instigated "color revolutions" in Eurasia, and orchestrated the "Arab Spring" in West Asia and North Africa, bringing chaos and disaster to many countries.

In 1823, the United States announced the Monroe Doctrine. While touting an "America for the Americans," what it truly wanted was an "America for the United States."

Since then, the policies of successive U.S. governments toward Latin America and the Caribbean Region have been riddled with political interference, military intervention and regime subversion. From its 61-year hostility toward and blockade of Cuba to its overthrow of the Allende government of Chile, U.S. policy on this region has been built on one maxim-those who submit will prosper; those who resist shall perish.

The year 2003 marked the beginning of a succession of "color revolutions" -- the "Rose Revolution" in Georgia, the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine and the "Tulip Revolution" in Kyrgyzstan. The U.S. Department of State openly admitted playing a "central role" in these "regime changes." The United States also interfered in the internal affairs of the Philippines, ousting President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. in 1986 and President Joseph Estrada in 2001 through the so-called "People Power Revolutions."

In January 2023, former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo released his new book Never Give an Inch: Fighting for the America I Love. He revealed in it that the United States had plotted to intervene in Venezuela. The plan was to force the Maduro government to reach an agreement with the opposition, deprive Venezuela of its ability to sell oil and gold for foreign exchange, exert high pressure on its economy, and influence the 2018 presidential election.

◆ The U.S. exercises double standards on international rules. Placing its self-interest first, the United States has walked away from international treaties and organizations, and put its domestic law above international law. In April 2017, the Trump administration announced that it would cut off all U.S. funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) with the excuse that the organization "supports, or participates in the management of a programme of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization." The United States quit UNESCO twice in 1984 and 2017. In 2017, it announced leaving the Paris Agreement on climate change. In 2018, it announced its exit from the UN Human Rights Council, citing the organization's "bias" against Israel and failure to protect human rights effectively. In 2019, the United States announced its withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty to seek unfettered development of advanced weapons. In 2020, it announced pulling out of the Treaty on Open Skies.

The United States has also been a stumbling block to biological arms control by opposing negotiations on a verification protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and impeding international verification of countries' activities relating to biological weapons. As the only country in possession of a chemical weapons stockpile, the United States has repeatedly delayed the destruction of chemical weapons and remained reluctant in fulfilling its obligations. It has become the biggest obstacle to realizing "a world free of chemical weapons."

◆ The United States is piecing together small blocs through its alliance system. It has been forcing an "Indo-Pacific Strategy" onto the Asia-Pacific region, assembling exclusive clubs like the Five Eyes, the Quad and AUKUS, and forcing regional countries to take sides. Such practices are essentially meant to create division in the region, stoke confrontation and undermine peace.

◆ The U.S. arbitrarily passes judgment on democracy in other countries, and fabricates a false narrative of "democracy versus authoritarianism" to incite estrangement, division, rivalry and confrontation. In December 2021, the United States hosted the first "Summit for Democracy," which drew criticism and opposition from many countries for making a mockery of the spirit of democracy and dividing the world. In March 2023, the United States will host another "Summit for Democracy," which remains unwelcome and will again find no support.

II. Military Hegemony -- Wanton Use of Force

The history of the United States is characterized by violence and expansion. Since it gained independence in 1776, the United States has constantly sought expansion by force: it slaughtered Indians, invaded Canada, waged a war against Mexico, instigated the American-Spanish War, and annexed Hawaii. After World War II, the wars either provoked or launched by the United States included the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan, the Iraq War, the Libyan War and the Syrian War, abusing its military hegemony to pave the way for expansionist objectives. In recent years, the U.S. average annual military budget has exceeded 700 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 40 percent of the world's total, more than the 15 countries behind it combined. The United States has about 800 overseas military bases, with 173,000 troops deployed in 159 countries.

According to the book America Invades: How We've Invaded or been Militarily Involved with almost Every Country on Earth, the United States has fought or been militarily involved with almost all the 190-odd countries recognized by the United Nations with only three exceptions. The three countries were "spared" because the United States did not find them on the map.

◆ As former U.S. President Jimmy Carter put it, the United States is undoubtedly the most warlike nation in the history of the world. According to a Tufts University report, "Introducing the Military Intervention Project: A new Dataset on U.S. Military Interventions, 1776-2019," the United States undertook nearly 400 military interventions globally between those years, 34 percent of which were in Latin America and the Caribbean, 23 percent in East Asia and the Pacific, 14 percent in the Middle East and North Africa, and 13 percent in Europe. Currently, its military intervention in the Middle East and North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa is on the rise.

Alex Lo, a South China Morning Post columnist, pointed out that the United States has rarely distinguished between diplomacy and war since its founding. It overthrew democratically elected governments in many developing countries in the 20th century and immediately replaced them with pro-American puppet regimes. Today, in Ukraine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Pakistan and Yemen, the United States is repeating its old tactics of waging proxy, low-intensity, and drone wars.

◆ U.S. military hegemony has caused humanitarian tragedies. Since 2001, the wars and military operations launched by the United States in the name of fighting terrorism have claimed over 900,000 lives with some 335,000 of them civilians, injured millions and displaced tens of millions. The 2003 Iraq War resulted in some 200,000 to 250,000 civilian deaths, including over 16,000 directly killed by the U.S. military, and left more than a million homeless.

The United States has created 37 million refugees around the world. Since 2012, the number of Syrian refugees alone has increased tenfold. Between 2016 and 2019, 33,584 civilian deaths were documented in the Syrian fightings, including 3,833 killed by U.S.-led coalition bombings, half of them women and children. The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) reported on 9 November 2018 that the air strikes launched by U.S. forces on Raqqa alone killed 1,600 Syrian civilians.

The two-decades-long war in Afghanistan devastated the country. A total of 47,000 Afghan civilians and 66,000 to 69,000 Afghan soldiers and police officers unrelated to the September 11 attacks were killed in U.S. military operations, and more than 10 million people were displaced. The war in Afghanistan destroyed the foundation of economic development there and plunged the Afghan people into destitution. After the "Kabul debacle" in 2021, the United States announced that it would freeze some 9.5 billion dollars in assets belonging to the Afghan central bank, a move considered as "pure looting."

In September 2022, Turkish Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu commented at a rally that the United States has waged a proxy war in Syria, turned Afghanistan into an opium field and heroin factory, thrown Pakistan into turmoil, and left Libya in incessant civil unrest. The United States does whatever it takes to rob and enslave the people of any country with underground resources.

The United States has also adopted appalling methods in war. During the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan and the Iraq War, the United States used massive quantities of chemical and biological weapons as well as cluster bombs, fuel-air bombs, graphite bombs and depleted uranium bombs, causing enormous damage on civilian facilities, countless civilian casualties and lasting environmental pollution.

III. Economic Hegemony -- Looting and Exploitation

After World War II, the United States led efforts to set up the Bretton Woods System, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which, together with the Marshall Plan, formed the international monetary system centered around the U.S. dollar. In addition, the United States has also established institutional hegemony in the international economic and financial sector by manipulating the weighted voting systems, rules and arrangements of international organizations including "approval by 85 percent majority," and its domestic trade laws and regulations. By taking advantage of the dollar's status as the major international reserve currency, the United States is basically collecting "seigniorage" from around the world; and using its control over international organizations, it coerces other countries into serving America's political and economic strategy.

◆ The United States exploits the world's wealth with the help of "seigniorage." It costs only about 17 cents to produce a 100 dollar bill, but other countries had to pony up 100 dollar of actual goods in order to obtain one. It was pointed out more than half a century ago, that the United States enjoyed exorbitant privilege and deficit without tears created by its dollar, and used the worthless paper note to plunder the resources and factories of other nations.

◆ The hegemony of U.S. dollar is the main source of instability and uncertainty in the world economy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States abused its global financial hegemony and injected trillions of dollars into the global market, leaving other countries, especially emerging economies, to pay the price. In 2022, the Fed ended its ultra-easy monetary policy and turned to aggressive interest rate hike, causing turmoil in the international financial market and substantial depreciation of other currencies such as the Euro, many of which dropped to a 20-year low. As a result, a large number of developing countries were challenged by high inflation, currency depreciation and capital outflows. This was exactly what Nixon's secretary of the treasury John Connally once remarked, with self-satisfaction yet sharp precision, that "the dollar is our currency, but it is your problem."

◆ With its control over international economic and financial organizations, the United States imposes additional conditions to their assistance to other countries. In order to reduce obstacles to U.S. capital inflow and speculation, the recipient countries are required to advance financial liberalization and open up financial markets so that their economic policies would fall in line with America's strategy. According to the Review of International Political Economy, along with the 1,550 debt relief programs extended by the IMF to its 131 member countries from 1985 to 2014, as many as 55,465 additional political conditions had been attached.

◆ The United States willfully suppresses its opponents with economic coercion. In the 1980s, to eliminate the economic threat posed by Japan, and to control and use the latter in service of America's strategic goal of confronting the Soviet Union and dominating the world, the United States leveraged its hegemonic financial power against Japan, and concluded the Plaza Accord. As a result, Yen was pushed up, and Japan was pressed to open up its financial market and reform its financial system. The Plaza Accord dealt a heavy blow to the growth momentum of the Japanese economy, leaving Japan to what was later called "three lost decades."

◆ America's economic and financial hegemony has become a geopolitical weapon. Doubling down on unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction," the United States has enacted such domestic laws as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, and the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, and introduced a series of executive orders to sanction specific countries, organizations or individuals. Statistics show that U.S. sanctions against foreign entities increased by 933 percent from 2000 to 2021. The Trump administration alone has imposed more than 3,900 sanctions, which means three sanctions per day. So far, the United States had or has imposed economic sanctions on nearly 40 countries across the world, including Cuba, China, Russia, the DPRK, Iran and Venezuela, affecting nearly half of the world's population. "The United States of America" has turned itself into "the United States of Sanctions." And "long-arm jurisdiction" has been reduced to nothing but a tool for the United States to use its means of state power to suppress economic competitors and interfere in normal international business. This is a serious departure from the principles of liberal market economy that the United States has long boasted.

IV. Technological Hegemony -- Monopoly and Suppression

The United States seeks to deter other countries' scientific, technological and economic development by wielding monopoly power, suppression measures and technology restrictions in high-tech fields.

◆ The United States monopolizes intellectual property in the name of protection. Taking advantage of the weak position of other countries, especially developing ones, on intellectual property rights and the institutional vacancy in relevant fields, the United States reaps excessive profits through monopoly. In 1994, the United States pushed forward the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), forcing the Americanized process and standards in intellectual property protection in an attempt to solidify its monopoly on technology.

In the 1980s, to contain the development of Japan's semiconductor industry, the United States launched the "301" investigation, built bargaining power in bilateral negotiations through multilateral agreements, threatened to label Japan as conducting unfair trade, and imposed retaliatory tariffs, forcing Japan to sign the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. As a result, Japanese semiconductor enterprises were almost completely driven out of global competition, and their market share dropped from 50 percent to 10 percent. Meanwhile, with the support of the U.S. government, a large number of U.S. semiconductor enterprises took the opportunity and grabbed larger market share.

◆ The United States politicizes, weaponizes technological issues and uses them as ideological tools. Overstretching the concept of national security, the United States mobilized state power to suppress and sanction Chinese company Huawei, restricted the entry of Huawei products into the U.S. market, cut off its supply of chips and operating systems, and coerced other countries to ban Huawei from undertaking local 5G network construction. It even talked Canada into unwarrantedly detaining Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou for nearly three years.

The United States has fabricated a slew of excuses to clamp down on China's high-tech enterprises with global competitiveness, and has put more than 1,000 Chinese enterprises on sanction lists. In addition, the United States has also imposed controls on biotechnology, artificial intelligence and other high-end technologies, reinforced export restrictions, tightened investment screening, suppressed Chinese social media apps such as TikTok and WeChat, and lobbied the Netherlands and Japan to restrict exports of chips and related equipment or technology to China.

The United States has also practiced double standards in its policy on China-related technological professionals. To sideline and suppress Chinese researchers, since June 2018, visa validity has been shortened for Chinese students majoring in certain high-tech-related disciplines, repeated cases have occurred where Chinese scholars and students going to the United States for exchange programs and study were unjustifiably denied and harassed, and large-scale investigation on Chinese scholars working in the United States was carried out.

◆ The United States solidifies its technological monopoly in the name of protecting democracy. By building small blocs on technology such as the "chips alliance" and "clean network," the United States has put "democracy" and "human rights" labels on high-technology, and turned technological issues into political and ideological issues, so as to fabricate excuses for its technological blockade against other countries. In May 2019, the United States enlisted 32 countries to the Prague 5G Security Conference in the Czech Republic and issued the Prague Proposal in an attempt to exclude China's 5G products. In April 2020, then U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the "5G clean path," a plan designed to build technological alliance in the 5G field with partners bonded by their shared ideology on democracy and the need to protect "cyber security." The measures, in essence, are the U.S. attempts to maintain its technological hegemony through technological alliances.

◆ The United States abuses its technological hegemony by carrying out cyber attacks and eavesdropping. The United States has long been notorious as an "empire of hackers," blamed for its rampant acts of cyber theft around the world. It has all kinds of means to enforce pervasive cyber attacks and surveillance, including using analog base station signals to access mobile phones for data theft, manipulating mobile apps, infiltrating cloud servers, and stealing through undersea cables. The list goes on.

U.S. surveillance is indiscriminate. All can be targets of its surveillance, be they rivals or allies, even leaders of allied countries such as former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and several French Presidents. Cyber surveillance and attacks launched by the United States such as "Prism," "Dirtbox," "Irritant Horn" and "Telescreen Operation" are all proof that the United States is closely monitoring its allies and partners. Such eavesdropping on allies and partners has already caused worldwide outrage. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, a website that has exposed U.S. surveillance programs, said that "do not expect a global surveillance superpower to act with honor or respect. There is only one rule: there are no rules."

V. Cultural Hegemony -- Spreading False Narratives

The global expansion of American culture is an important part of its external strategy. The United States has often used cultural tools to strengthen and maintain its hegemony in the world.

◆ The United States embeds American values in its products such as movies. American values and lifestyle are a tied product to its movies and TV shows, publications, media content, and programs by the government-funded non-profit cultural institutions. It thus shapes a cultural and public opinion space in which American culture reigns and maintains cultural hegemony. In his article The Americanization of the World, John Yemma, an American scholar, exposed the real weapons in U.S. cultural expansion: the Hollywood, the image design factories on Madison Avenue and the production lines of Mattel Company and Coca-Cola.

There are various vehicles the United States uses to keep its cultural hegemony. American movies are the most used; they now occupy more than 70 percent of the world's market share. The United States skilfully exploits its cultural diversity to appeal to various ethnicities. When Hollywood movies descend on the world, they scream the American values tied to them.

◆ American cultural hegemony not only shows itself in "direct intervention," but also in "media infiltration" and as "a trumpet for the world." U.S.-dominated Western media has a particularly important role in shaping global public opinion in favor of U.S. meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.

The U.S. government strictly censors all social media companies and demands their obedience. Twitter CEO Elon Musk admitted on 27 December 2022 that all social media platforms work with the U.S. government to censor content, reported Fox Business Network. Public opinion in the United States is subject to government intervention to restrict all unfavorable remarks. Google often makes pages disappear.

U.S. Department of Defense manipulates social media. In December 2022, The Intercept, an independent U.S. investigative website, revealed that in July 2017, U.S. Central Command official Nathaniel Kahler instructed Twitter's public policy team to augment the presence of 52 Arabic-language accounts on a list he sent, six of which were to be given priority. One of the six was dedicated to justifying U.S. drone attacks in Yemen, such as by claiming that the attacks were precise and killed only terrorists, not civilians. Following Kahler's directive, Twitter put those Arabic-language accounts on a "white list" to amplify certain messages.

◆The United States practices double standards on the freedom of the press. It brutally suppresses and silences media of other countries by various means. The United States and Europe bar mainstream Russian media such as Russia Today and the Sputnik from their countries. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube openly restrict official accounts of Russia. Netflix, Apple and Google have removed Russian channels and applications from their services and app stores. Unprecedented draconian censorship is imposed on Russia-related contents.

◆The United States abuses its cultural hegemony to instigate "peaceful evolution" in socialist countries. It sets up news media and cultural outfits targeting socialist countries. It pours staggering amounts of public funds into radio and TV networks to support their ideological infiltration, and these mouthpieces bombard socialist countries in dozens of languages with inflammatory propaganda day and night.

The United States uses misinformation as a spear to attack other countries, and has built an industrial chain around it: there are groups and individuals making up stories, and peddling them worldwide to mislead public opinion with the support of nearly limitless financial resources.


Conclusion

While a just cause wins its champion wide support, an unjust one condemns its pursuer to be an outcast. The hegemonic, domineering, and bullying practices of using strength to intimidate the weak, taking from others by force and subterfuge, and playing zero-sum games are exerting grave harm. The historical trends of peace, development, cooperation, and mutual benefit are unstoppable. The United States has been overriding truth with its power and trampling justice to serve self-interest. These unilateral, egoistic and regressive hegemonic practices have drawn growing, intense criticism and opposition from the international community.

Countries need to respect each other and treat each other as equals. Big countries should behave in a manner befitting their status and take the lead in pursuing a new model of state-to-state relations featuring dialogue and partnership, not confrontation or alliance. China opposes all forms of hegemonism and power politics, and rejects interference in other countries' internal affairs. The United States must conduct serious soul-searching. It must critically examine what it has done, let go of its arrogance and prejudice, and quit its hegemonic, domineering and bullying practices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I saw that being discussed a few days ago, and I found it interesting, mostly because it goes to show you that the Chinese, as probably do many other governments in the world, see right through the US and the effect it has had on the world.

Which implies that while the US feels as the "leader" of the "free world" in reality, a lot more people see behind the facade and understand exactly what the US is, a mafia leader who pushes and intimidates others into falling in line.

To me, China and other nations continue to do business with the US because it's such a large client that it's an attractive market, and ruining it would entail collapse for everyone to a large degree, but I daresay that a lot of them see the inevitable suicidal tendencies, and see it eventually going down, potentially taking the EU with it, and everyone's kind of just waiting it out.
 
Perhaps one day historians will refer to this document as the first salvo in the US-Chinese estrangement and even perhaps war.

Or maybe the Chinese spy balloon affair. It's interesting that this more open belligerence from China comes on the heels of that event.

As I noted in the balloon thread, I think a big scene was deliberately made of that otherwise innocuous event. Over the years there have been multiple other similar balloon incursions into the US with barely a word said. The US and several other countries regularly fly such balloons over other countries, China included, and again, barely a word said. The US flagrantly spies on anyone and everyone, and all accept it as par for the course.

So WHY was such a deal made about this one?

Seems to me that some power brokers in the US (deep state) did so deliberately to antagonize China, or, more specifically, to make clear their belligerent intent towards China, basically, the gloves are off.

China got the message, and has begun to respond to the collapsing of that particular wave function.
 
It’s not that no one else would say it, it’s that no one could say it before, including China.

Now that China has reached the position it has as a geopolitical powerhouse, there’s nothing stopping them from saying it anymore.

Agreed TC but there is also the question 'just because we can say it, should we say it'. In the pre 2022 world none of these facts (other than any mention of fueling Ukraine post then) were any different. The difference in 2023 is diplomacy is now officially dead. Its over. The Chinese - and the Russians - have decided there's no point even pretending to converse rationally with the west. Its a clear basket case of insanity and malignancy so lets move on. Hence the time is right to say it.

To my mind this set of salvos is not intended for western ears but the 8/10ths of the rest of the world who have had enough of the bully and want to move on to a different playground.


Yes I see your point Zzartemis but one has to ask - why did the Chinese take such a provocative position on two contentious internal social issues within the US, (and as per your above), along with two geopolitical statements? To get across a message to other countries, slanted though it may be, namely 'is this is the festering culture that you want to get into bed with and then have invade your streets?' It's a clear statement of 'let's make a different, better world without these people' - and as TC says, now they can say it, and having broken ranks, its a also a promise and an invitation saying China is strong enough to face down and replace the bully with a more benign form of protective big brother.

The bottom line is that China and Russia mean business and their shop is well and truly open for business.

Cold War 2.0 has officially started. This time though its not ideologically based - it's sanity vs insanity based. Sadly it's likely really only a question of how, where and when it goes hot.
 
Or maybe the Chinese spy balloon affair. It's interesting that this more open belligerence from China comes on the heels of that event.

As I noted in the balloon thread, I think a big scene was deliberately made of that otherwise innocuous event. Over the years there have been multiple other similar balloon incursions into the US with barely a word said. The US and several other countries regularly fly such balloons over other countries, China included, and again, barely a word said. The US flagrantly spies on anyone and everyone, and all accept it as par for the course.

So WHY was such a deal made about this one?

Seems to me that some power brokers in the US (deep state) did so deliberately to antagonize China, or, more specifically, to make clear their belligerent intent towards China, basically, the gloves are off.

China got the message, and has begun to respond to the collapsing of that particular wave function.

One can assume the Chinese have been probably quietly preparing these statements in unison for sometime Joe on the expectation of using them when the moment is right. It does seem as if they've taken the balloon farce as that moment, namely if the US is going to use something that we have both been doing for years without previous bother and turn it into such a grotesque crisis, we have now obviously reached that moment of going all in - so take that, I'll raise you - how's about some statements of hard faced reality to match your buffoonery!

In the wake of all the hissy fits from the US around fake weapons to Russia, Wang Li's trip to Moscow to meet with Lavrov and Putin comes across as a clear message that there's no stopping this now with mere threats and rhetoric. The March meeting in Moscow between Putin and Xi Jinping will no doubt create even bigger waves of momentum.

Maybe the time has come again to watch out for any hints that the infamous ZZZyber attack Dr. Klaus promised us all back in 2021 is on its way .

Cyber-Attacks

In 2021, the WEF conducted a simulation of Cyber Attacks involving a scenario of Paralysis of the Power Supply, Communications, Transportation, The Internet.

Klaus Schwab
intimated in no uncertain terms based on “a simulated scenario” that a cyber-attack: “could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole”.
What does Schwab have up his sleeve. A “Cyber Terrorist Attack” conducive to unprecedented disruptions? Is this something that we should take seriously?

A renewed fear campaign, a warning of an impending danger? In the words of Jeremy Jurgens, WEF Managing Director:
“I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.” (emphasis added)
The 2021 cyber polygon simulation scenario had an obvious “contradictory” geopolitical slant:
The event was chaired by Russia’s Prime Minister
Mikhail Mishustin, numerous Russian financial institutions, media and communications entities had been invited by the WEF.

Forty-eight countries participated in the Event, there were 41 partners of which 10 were from the Russia and Kazakhstan: News Agency TASS, NTV, Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank and a leading global financial institution, the Mail.ru Group, Russia’s largest internet provider, MTS, Russia’s leading telecommunications group, the State Legal Department of the Omsk Region, Siberia. Powerful banking financial institutions from Kazakstan. Among others.

See also the assumptions of the Training Program, which are predicated on terrorist hackers.

Amply documented, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has been instrumental in endorsing US-NATO’s military agenda in regards to Ukraine.

Was this July 2021 Cyber Polygon event (which occurred 8 months prior to the Ukraine War) intent upon creating political divisions within the Russian Federation by establishing partnerships with a number of powerful Russian media, communications, banking and financial institutions, etc.

Not a single representative from the People’s Republic of China. Was the Cyber Polygon Simulation (July 2021) intended to foster confrontation between China and Russia?


A few months later, starting in March 2022, Russia was put on the WEF black list, Russian institutions were excluded from participating in both the WEF May 2022 as well as January 2023 Davos Venues.


“The World Economic Forum has put on ice its relationships with Russia, including strategic partnerships with conglomerates run by oligarchs.”

Is this Scenario a Dress Rehearsal for a forthcoming cyber crisis?

The geopolitics of this exercise are complex. While Russia is routinely threatened by US-NATO, the Russian Federation is a partner of this WEF initiative, which is largely dominated by Wall Street and the Western financial establishment.

Why was China –which is an ally of Russia– excluded from the Cyber Polygon Exercise?

The Cyber Attack is categorized as a Terrorist Act. Ask yourself the question: Who has the capabilities of carrying out such an attack?

Russia’s financial and banking establishment were actively involved in the Cyber Scenario. Was the exercise intended to create divisions between China and Russia?

While one cannot speculate, the matter must nonetheless be addressed.

And who will be blamed if the Cyber Scenario goes live?

Engineered economic and social chaos. Is that not part of a US hegemonic project?
 
Final thought before I get out the way: thinking of the attritional way the Russians are fighting in Ukraine makes me consider whether the double act of China-Russia is now doing the same on the diplomatic front. They know the US/West is only able to fight one way where as they plan 4 steps ahead - so maybe we are now seeing - from Putin's speech to the nation, these statements, calls by Russia for a UN investigation of Nord Stream, pressure on Sweden, all the visits etc - but the start of a giant rolling process of tag between the two countries whereby they are going on the offensive their way as much to goad the US into further rash steps to further add fuel to their case of 'just look how mad and dangerous these people now are and something must be done to stop them now'.

The old cold war was one thing, this one is going to be on quite another level. The US is not the US of the 1960s-1980s and now they have two entwined Titans to confront, there's only going to be one winner to my mind. If anyone is to win that is...

Just a thought.
 
The other issue from China’s standpoint is the US threatening to start a war with them over Taiwan. So they’re responding to a threat.

What you @Michael B-C said about “Are these the people you want to align yourself with?”, could also be a strong hint for the Taiwanese to think about their future.
 

Brian Berletic summarises the situation nicely, and points out that a direct confrontation between the US and China does not look favourable for the States in most war games. Using Taiwan as a proxy is an obvious goal of the US, but doing so would be fraught with issues that Ukraine doesn't have. The reality though is that the economic fallout is massive in any scenario other than peaceful reunification.
 
The gloves were coming off clearly a year ago when Blinken and Senior Chinese diplomat Yang Jiechi met in Alaska. When the Chinese diplomat started to point his hand at the US side I sensed that nothing constructive could be worked out with the US. US only understand one policy, "We say what will be done"

The English translation begins at 24:23 and ends at 38:11 following the previous 17 minutes talking in Chinese. The missed last part (1:00:00 to the end) has been added.
Interesting detail -


Nee Zhen Chui

1 year ago
The Chinese officials are so powerful. When the American officials asked the media to leave, the Chinese officials directly ignored the U.S. reaction and asked the media to stay and record their conversations. The Chinese officials also asked the U.S. officials why they were afraid of the media.

"That is the secret sauce of America."

This meeting fireworks were almost as good as Putin's speech in Munich in 2007.
 
Last edited:
The Chinese officials are so powerful. When the American officials asked the media to leave, the Chinese officials directly ignored the U.S. reaction and asked the media to stay and record their conversations. The Chinese officials also asked the U.S. officials why they were afraid of the media.

Did you mean that the above happened in the video you linked, or at some other point during the meeting? In the video, it’s Blinken who asks the media to stay.
 
Did you mean that the above happened in the video you linked, or at some other point during the meeting? In the video, it’s Blinken who asks the media to stay.
I recall watching this meeting a year ago. The videos available then were not complete but I do recall chatter on a forum that the Chinese wanted the media to watch the whole meeting and the US did not. No, I did not see the part (if it exists) where the US said "OK, press please leave". I'm going on what I recall.

Yes, in the second short video we see where US is saying stay.

Would the US at the beginning of the meeting ask the Press to leave ? If someone were to ask me this I would say yes as openness is not a strong card in US diplomacy. Maiden leaks show that clearly.

PS: I Just looked further down the comments and found this,

Time Traveler

1 year ago
@gary prater The U.S. officials kicked the press out, but the Chinese official wanted the press to stay and record what they were saying. The U.S. officials later did call the press back.
Is that the story of what happened ? I have no idea, but that is not the most important thing about this meeting. This is a glimpse into how diplomats talk to each other. For me that is the first time I had a chance to see something like that, over 1 hr. of it.
 
One commentor I watched yesterday referred to the Chinese document as a quiet declaration of war. The Chinese being slow, methodical, and setting the stage. Russia in its own way has also been notifying the global community similarly in what I would call a “legal” format. Perhaps to notify the global community of what is about to happen and set “a reason” for why it is going to happen. And, or to say: Pick a side global community and choose well.

As the curtain is being pulled back, IMO the message is: We have a bellicose-rogue-nation, a loose-cannon, and if we don’t do something about it, we are all going to go down with it. Exposing the nation that is being used as HQ for the dirty works department.

I think the Russians know when they go to the UN, they are only going to get an elbow in the eye, and told to shut up, but they are establishing the case for posterity, and setting the stage for calling out the UN as corrupt in the future.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom