"The Psyche as interaction: electromagnetic patterns of conscious energy" - valid physics?

JGeropoulas

The Living Force
The Psyche as Interaction: Electromagnetic Patterns of Conscious Energy by Manya J. Long is a book title that's intrigued me for months so I went to their Facebook page where I found 7 installments of excerpts from the Conclusion. The book's premise seems harmonious with other familiar concepts, such as "reality as we experience it is ultimately an illusion" and "octaves". I can follow the very basic ideas, but get lost in the physics, as I know practically nothing about that field. So, I'd like an informed opinion by those adept in physics before I expend energy trying to comprehend what's said.

Here's an example (Part 7), followed by the complete excerpt (Parts 1-7):

Just as π, 3.141, defines a circle (and a confined sinewave by a boundary, such as the conscious and unconscious intervals, which generates a circular holographic pattern), it also represents the radius, as an octave and, consequently, 2 π, 6.282, which represents the diameter as two octaves. So that 2 π/3 (2.1) represents C#’ as an octave above the fundamental tone of C, and also the √5 (2.24) and the angle of 45˚, which defines both DNA’s (this includes all earthly 1.6 billion species which have the same DNA, and only the bases are different) (see: Neurophysiological Appendices) pentagonal, cellular structure, and also the earth’s dodecahedron electromagnetic grid system; for example, the major ley lines.

Another multiple of π, through which the crystallographic molecular structures manifest, is π/2 (1.6 or the golden mean, also Φ “phi”), which with the √3 results in a 60˚ angle defining a hexagon consisting of six equilateral triangles and manifesting as carbon’s molecular structure. The interval of 1.5 also represents all earthly organisms’ DNA structure and our lapse of consciousness from 0.8 – 1.2s and language (which Varela and Maturana demonstrated that we use to “structurally couple” [cocreate] with our environment).

The lapse of consciousness interval is produced by the ratio (or the interaction of the two whole numbers) 2:3, which is the ratio of 1.5 (3/2). This ratio of 1.5 represents our 0.8-1.2 unconscious span of time (1.2/.8). Our unconscious span of time occurs alternately between our .95s-1s conscious span of time. The ratio of our conscious interval of time is 1.05 (1/.95). These unconscious and conscious intervals are produced by the discrete discontinuous quantized and periodic nature of energy as produced by the √2 (note: all mass is an equivalent aspect of energy, e.g., E=MC²). This interval of 1.5 would be the same for all carbon-based earthly organisms that share the same DNA. Consequently, due to the periodic nature of energy, all worldly phenomena would blink on-and-off together (i.e., materialize/manifest/actualize and dematerialize/non-manifest/ deactualize) since the angle (phase/time) of the wave is the same over the entire sphere centered on the origin at any given time per Ditchburn’s L͟i͟g͟h͟t͟ and as waves whose phases (e.g. height/amplitude/ intensity/hypotenuse) would match (or square, which to multiply something by itself, or to cross opposites, e.g. magnetism and electricity, which are two seemingly different aspects of the same thing at right, 90˚ angles to each other manifested by the √2), or amplify, the result would be the apparent actualization or manifestation of an object (the “intensity” [e.g., the squaring of the height or amplitude of a wave] of a feeling [e.g. emotions are at the 5 - 8cps theta brain wave frequency, which is also this reality’s base resonant frequency]).

This interval of unconsciousness (1.5) would be the basis for the interconnectedness and telepathic agreement between all worldly phenomena whose natural base resonant frequencies vibrate within a narrow bandwidth of 5 - 8cps, or meters. This natural resonant frequency range coincides with our human theta (5 - 8cps) brain wave clusters.

The complete excerpt (Parts 1-7)

Part 1:

“In other words, there is no exteriorization of nature; everything is the mental, spiritual, and psychic manifestation of All That Is”. The universe, (only from a human perspective) is a three-dimensional emotional projection through the senses at 5-8cps. This is the same frequency as the human brain’s theta waves and the base resonate frequency of all worldly phenomenon. So that all worldly phenomenon is a holographic projection viewed on our visual cortex.

This phenomenal world springs into being or actualization within the first 5 billionth of a second during our .95-1s consciousness interval in accordance with inner models. These models are part of collective unconscious archetypal thought/frequency patterns. The patterns represent the 60,000 thoughts per day per person.

Thus, the infinite versions of the sinewave function are collapsed when a decision is made by the individual consciousness at 5 billionth of a second. Actualization of what appears to be all worldly phenomenon during this consciousness interval is starting to be built-up on individual visual cortexes at 5-8cps.

Consequently, physical forms are the linear, time-oriented succession of 150 images or resolutions being built up on our visual cortex. These images as archetypes then return to the overall energy of All That Is.

Seth, the “non-physical ‘energy personality essence’”¹ for whom author Jane Roberts speaks as while she’s in a trance, could have been referring to the hologram [note: in ancient India, the Hindus had a term for this reality being an allusion: it was “maya”] or holomovement, that a rotating circle (representing two octaves, so that the interval which is one octave represents the radius as π (Pi), or 3.141, which corresponds to a 2:1 [radius to diameter] ratio [as represented by the √2, which defines a square, and is also the diagonal of the square with sides of “1”], a 90 degree angle and the intervals of 1.414). The intervals √3 as 1.73 and √5 as 2.24 are latently implied, or nested within the √2, as is ¹²√2 as the intervals of 1.05 [which is what all the earth 1.6 billion species’ DNA is based on, as is human language and human music along with bird’s song], and represents the crystallographic multiples of π, as they correspond to atomic and molecular structures. The √2 represents the Principle of Alternation [“everything alternates towards its opposite”], which is the crossing of opposites, resulting in the attractive forces of magnetism and electricity as in water, H₂O [2 Hydrogen atoms and 1 Oxygen atom], and also the seven-fold axial system [axis of symmetry] of crystal lattices [whose atoms are represented crystallographically as a regular system of points], representing archetypal forms generated by a confined sinewave resulting in spherical harmonic waveforms.

“The sinewave is the sum total of the wave form (thought form).” The sinewave is a formal, numerical relationship that is also a non-periodic (its vibrations are arbitrary), single, harmonic partial, containing only one frequency component (the octave sense is not strong with pure tones), which underlies all other waveforms that are generated by a rotating circle (the ratio of the circumference to the diameter equals π (Pi) which is the interval of 3.141 [or one octave (radius), or 22/7, or 3 1/7], by which the circle is defined) and when confined (as in the interaction [resonance] or “the crossing of opposites” [which produces an angle, whereby “energies are controlled, specified, and modified”² by initiating from duality (as a “seeming” difference from All That Is), the principle of alternation (frequency), the √2 (Note: The ancient Egyptians portrayed this “crossing of opposites,” etc. as the mouth of Re; this generative principle was the symbol for the supreme creator, Atum-Re), and the Taoist Yin and Yang female/male concepts]), the y-axis being perpendicular, as magnetism is to electricity [at right, 90˚ angles], to the x-axis, for example the division of a circle as unity electron patterns (probabilities), which are then by their nature quantified, discrete, discontinuous and periodic bits of movement [energy] as spherical, harmonic (octave) waveforms. These possess both kinetic and potential energy, and can then only vibrate at certain periodic (repetitious patterns [iterations], which constitute recurrence as the basis for the molecular stability necessary for our 1.05 intervals based 17 senses to be able to apprehend frequency as an object), natural frequencies, or a narrow bandwidth of frequency. This bandwidth for all worldly phenomenon is 1 1/2 - 2 octaves (a circle), or 5 - 8cps.

1 Unknown Reality, Roberts, p. 301
2 Sacred Geometry, Lawlor, p. 8

Part 2:

Vibration, as movement, is the basis of the electromagnetic spectrum and is the result of the interaction, or confinement of a sinewave to the boundary of a spherical surface, or “the crossing of opposites”³, which produces the holographic and dual aspects of electricity and magnetism. These are perpendicular (at right, 90˚ to each other) interactions, whose height/amplitude/hypotenuse are the √2 (the square root is a proportion, and as such is the comparison of equivalent ratios, which measure differences so that a proportion simultaneously and paradoxically represents the holographic property of sameness within difference; for example, the part containing the whole [note: the atomic valence structure of carbon - all earthly organisms are carbon based - is tetrahedral and reflects the √2 and 90˚ electron bond angles of the “p” orbitals]), or the interval of 1.414 (which defines the shape or form of a square) as the crossing of opposite, equal line lengths as arms of the atomic structure of carbon, which are at 90˚ right angles to each other, and also as the multiplication (symbolized by the cross), or any number (as “an archetype of order”, concept, or thought pattern) by itself is a square. Logarithms, such as the musical scale (12√2 defines the musical notes) or our perceptual senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, smell, etc., are the result of squaring (crossing) a number (i.e., ¹²√2 = 1.05 when multiplied by itself 12 times equals the √2, or 1.414 [an archetype of order]) - multiplying it by itself - then, continually multiplying (i.e. crossing) that result by the original number (“an archetype of order”⁴).

Consequently, our sensorial experience (i.e., moment-by-moment or image frame-by-frame built up on the visual cortex combined with the appropriately matching smell, touch, taste, and sound sensation, etc.) is an “octave”, or harmonic experience of holographic aspects, based upon the natural resonant frequency, 5 - 8cps, and then produces an axis of symmetry (the “y”-axis, i.e. magnetism/space) for the waveform.

3 Sacred Geometry, Lawlor, p. 82
4 Note: The ¹²√2=1.05, which is what the intervals or notes of music and our 17 different senses are based upon. Also, birdsong and human language are based on the 122

Part 3:

These spherical, harmonic waveforms that are produced by the confinement (interaction) of a sinewave to a surface (i.e. a boundary, such as our conscious, .95s - 1s interval of 1.05, or our unconscious, 0.8s - 1.2s interval of 1.5), symbolically represent interacting thought/energy patterns within the conceptual frame work of opposites in order to produce duality (for example, the earth is a sphere); and they possess an axis of symmetry similar to that of the earth’s 23.5˚ degree axis (which designates the four seasons),and are marked by north and south poles. According to Quantum Theory, confined waveforms have quantified (same as, discrete, discontinuous or periodic), dynamic attributes (note: as mentioned earlier from S̲a̲c̲r̲e̲d̲ G̲e̲o̲m̲e̲t̲r̲y̲, dynamic quantities result from the asymmetrical divisions [such as the hypotenuse of a right triangle and/or the diagonal of a square resulting in a square root] of unity [as represented by the #1 Mother Archetype]; for example, 1: √2, which is the proportion for growth: psychological as well as physical), such as position, momentum and external spin, which are contextual and depend upon the manner of measurement (note: an electron, as an elementary particle, does have innate or static attributes, such as mass, charge and internal spin about the axis of symmetry). From a physics aspect, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle applies here, because it states that a particle does not possess both position and momentum simultaneously (note: Sambursky, in T̲h̲e̲ P̲h̲y̲s̲i̲c̲a̲l̲ W̲o̲r̲l̲d̲ o̲f̲ L̲a̲t̲e̲ A̲n̲t̲i̲q̲u̲i̲t̲y̲, concluded that all key modern scientific concepts originated from Greek natural philosophy [for example; atoms, matter, space, time, energy, the unified field theory, and mathematics as the language of science]). David Bohm, in Q̲u̲a̲n̲t̲u̲m̲ T̲h̲e̲o̲r̲y̲ (pg. 147), concurred that “actually, many of the ancient Greeks were unable to grasp the idea of continuous motion, as those who have studied Zeno’s paradoxes will know.”⁵ One of the most famous of these paradoxes concerns an arrow in flight. Since at each instant of time the arrow is occupying a definite position, it cannot at the same time be moving (this is the Uncertainty Principle’s unconscious base).

Consequently, all particles composing an object (from an electron, to an atom, to a molecule, to a cell, etc.) have an axis of symmetry which determines their internal spin, and that acts as both a channel for energy (note: energy can only be absorbed into a system through the north pole of the “y”-axis - and, o̲n̲l̲y̲ at the natural resonant base frequency) and its focal point for the exchange (interaction - “crossing of opposites”) of that energy (i.e. the rotational moment of informational patterns) between the center (for example, the origin, which is the intersection of the “x” and “y” axis of a circle, and its symmetrical divisor - the diameter) and the outside (for example, the perimeter of a circle is its circumference, so that the comparison of difference - the ratio - of the divisor or diameter to the perimeter or circumference [c/d = π] is defined by π [π, 22/7, 3 1/7, or 3.14]) of the motion.

5 Note: Ptolemy correlated the 12 zodiacal signs [personality patterns] with the tones of the musical system, which then was correlated several centuries later by Kepler with the planets' orbits.

Part 4:

Motion involves a change of position (a dynamic, quantified, periodic attribute defined by the #2 Father Archetype, whose qualities include dynamism, ordering [as in number, frequency, and time], duality [defined by the √2 as the Principle of Alternation or Yin and Yang], creativity, movement, and energy) and is generally expressed as a function of time (i.e. the “x-axis”/electricity), which is the same as the phase or angle of the wave, and is determined by a ratio (interaction, or “crossing of opposites”) of two whole numbers. (Note: in the case of earthly phenomenon these two whole numbers are 2 [represented by the #2 Father Archetypal concept of conflict], and 3 [represented by the #3 Archetype of Union resulting in an outcome]. This orthogonality of repetitious, relational, informational thought patterns, as standing waves [the #2 Father Archetype represents the frequency 4.29 to 4.92 x 10¹⁴, which is the color “red” and the #3 Archetype of Union represents the frequency 5.08 to 5.26 x 10¹⁴, which is the color “yellow” as the ratio 2:3], creates the unconscious [0.8s - 1.2s] interval of 1.5 or π/2, where our psyches agree and decide upon [the site or measurement where the sinewave collapses, and a possibility becomes a probability] the information that will be physically manifested as objects/events in the next conscious interval of [.95s - 1 second], 1.05 or π/3.)

Therefore, a rotating circle, as an archetypal thoughtform, creates a sinewave (a formal, numerical relationship which is the basis of a hologram), which, when confined, vibrates periodically only within a narrow bandwidth of frequency/rotation (the natural resonant frequency), defined by the √2 and resulting in a repetitious, circular pattern of numerically coded information; for example, a wave signal, which has an axis of symmetry similar to our spine’s function as the human axis of symmetry, and both of which create a cortex of energy analogous with a “y”-axis.

Part 5:

As mentioned earlier, the basis of energy, albeit the entire electromagnetic spectrum, is movement or motion caused by interaction. (This is the basis for the recurrence found in nature, which gives the molecular structure of matter its stability. This resonance phenomenon, or the interaction of electrons within an atom and between atoms (photons), is based on the quantum mechanical principle of differences having a common base; for example, a ratio. In the case of all worldly phenomena this ratio is 2:3, the interval of 1.5, the angle of 90˚ degrees, √2, the atomic structure C:G, the perfect fifth, and √3 as a formative principle that defines a triangular and hexagonal structure as 60˚ for molecular structures). The confinement of a sinewave to a spherical surface (defined by the ratio of π (pi), and the interval of 3.141) results in periodic frequencies having the holographic properties of self-actualization and non-linearity (as in the sense of an octave), creating as its aspects: electricity and magnetism (represented by interaction at right, 90˚ angles to each other); sound, which is the movement of the circular, repetitious, numerically coded patterns within the human perceptual hearing range of 18cps - 20,000cps (10¹ - 10⁴); and visible light, which is the circular, repetitious, numerically coded patterns within the human visual range of 429 trillion cps - 750 trillion cps, 10¹⁴. In other words, the entire electromagnetic spectrum, from 10¹ (power and telephone frequency) to 10²⁴ (gamma ray frequency), is harmonically based on the logarithmic scale of 10 and is arranged in octaves. (Note: “The musical octave is based on a tone, whose vibrational frequency is in an exact ratio of 2:1 with another tone.”) A scale of eight natural tonal divisions from C to C’ is called an octave. For example, water as H₂O represents a 2:1 ratio and occurs on earth as a solid [ice], liquid [water], and gas [steam]. Similarly, hydrogen and carbon both have a tetrahedral atomic valence structure, whose bonds [arms] are at right, 90˚ degree angles to each other and this then corresponds to the √2. The human body is composed of 70-90% water [with the remainder mostly being carbon], as H₂O [a 2:1 ratio or an octave, 1/2 of a circle, or π (3.141)], which receives and divides the sunlight [photons] by utilizing the crystalline, √3 molecular structure [which finds its stability in recurrence, or the repetitious wave patterns] of the water in our cells into √5, pentagonal cellular structures. So, the two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen represent a 2:1 ratio, or an octave. As an octave, it represents π, or 3.141, and reflects the division of the One [unity] into two [duality]. Or, more precisely, the archetypal form of a circle, which is defined by the proportion of the √2 whose asymmetrical divisor is the diagonal, which then becomes the root of the next square. From the ¹²√2 is manifested the ratio of π/3, or the interval of 1.05, which defines not only the musical notes [semitones], but also language and our perceptual senses, but also our conscious interval of .95s - 1s, or confinement of a sinewave to a surface.

Part 6:

Just as there is a narrow, finite range of frequencies that vibrate as a result of a confined (interacting) sinewave to a surface so that they’re called spherical, harmonic waveforms, and they have an axis of symmetry resulting in the bilateral symmetry of molecular structure (which was demonstrated by Hans Jenny’s Chemical experiment C͟y͟m͟a͟t͟i͟c͟s͟) that produces a
particle’s intrinsic spin (a static attribute) and an external (dynamic) spin as it rotates and creates space, there is also a finite amount of crystallographic groups of motion according to Hilbert in G͟e͟o͟m͟e͟t͟r͟y͟ ͟a͟n͟d͟ ͟t͟h͟e͟ ͟I͟m͟a͟g͟i͟n͟a͟t͟i͟o͟n͟. The discrete, discontinuous, periodic, or quantized nature of energy (as a result of the √2), translates into a regular, geometrically arranged system of points; for example, the atoms of all of the 92 naturally occurring elements (of which 96% can be reduced down to only four elements: hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon).

This system of points defines the atomic (√2) and molecular (√3) structure of cells or crystallographic classes of motion in space (Hilbert refers to them as the five regular polyhedron; for example, the tetrahedron, the octahedron, the icosahedrons, the cube and the dodecahedron, or, as they were known in antiquity, as the five Platonic Solids, all of which can be deformed to a sphere [topology] as they represent the elements of the periodic table).

In his book, G͟e͟o͟m͟e͟t͟r͟y͟ ͟a͟n͟d͟ ͟t͟h͟e͟ ͟I͟m͟a͟g͟i͟n͟a͟t͟i͟o͟n͟, Hilbert mathematically proved that there cannot be any rotations (of that waveform’s axis of symmetry) through angles, which are the result or the comparison of two whole numbers as a ratio (interaction), other than the multiples of π (3.141), 2 π/3(2.1), π/2, and (1.6; + π/3 (1.05) for the crystallographic atomic, molecular and cellular structures of earth’s carbon-based organisms. (Note: in Plato’s T͟i͟m͟a͟e͟u͟s͟ the concept of reality as being the result of a revolving model of simultaneous, mathematical forms [sinewaves/thoughtforms] from the body of ideas [collective unconscious] arranged in a linear, temporal succession by the demiurge finds a parallel with the earth’s (π), carbon-based structures.)

Part 7:

Just as π, 3.141, defines a circle (and a confined sinewave by a boundary, such as the conscious and unconscious intervals, which generates a circular holographic pattern), it also represents the radius, as an octave and, consequently, 2 π, 6.282, which represents the diameter as two octaves. So that 2 π/3 (2.1) represents C#’ as an octave above the fundamental tone of C, and also the √5 (2.24) and the angle of 45˚, which defines both DNA’s (this includes all earthly 1.6 billion species which have the same DNA, and only the bases are different) (see: Neurophysiological Appendices) pentagonal, cellular structure, and also the earth’s dodecahedron electromagnetic grid system; for example, the major ley lines.

Another multiple of π, through which the crystallographic molecular structures manifest, is π/2 (1.6 or the golden mean, also Φ “phi”), which with the √3 results in a 60˚ angle defining a hexagon consisting of six equilateral triangles and manifesting as carbon’s molecular structure. The interval of 1.5 also represents all earthly organisms’ DNA structure and our lapse of consciousness from 0.8 – 1.2s and language (which Varela and Maturana demonstrated that we use to “structurally couple” [cocreate] with our environment).

The lapse of consciousness interval is produced by the ratio (or the interaction of the two whole numbers) 2:3, which is the ratio of 1.5 (3/2). This ratio of 1.5 represents our 0.8-1.2 unconscious span of time (1.2/.8). Our unconscious span of time occurs alternately between our .95s-1s conscious span of time. The ratio of our conscious interval of time is 1.05 (1/.95). These unconscious and conscious intervals are produced by the discrete discontinuous quantized and periodic nature of energy as produced by the √2 (note: all mass is an equivalent aspect of energy, e.g., E=MC²). This interval of 1.5 would be the same for all carbon-based earthly organisms that share the same DNA. Consequently, due to the periodic nature of energy, all worldly phenomena would blink on-and-off together (i.e., materialize/manifest/actualize and dematerialize/non-manifest/ deactualize) since the angle (phase/time) of the wave is the same over the entire sphere centered on the origin at any given time per Ditchburn’s L͟i͟g͟h͟t͟ and as waves whose phases (e.g. height/amplitude/ intensity/hypotenuse) would match (or square, which to multiply something by itself, or to cross opposites, e.g. magnetism and electricity, which are two seemingly different aspects of the same thing at right, 90˚ angles to each other manifested by the √2), or amplify, the result would be the apparent actualization or manifestation of an object (the “intensity” [e.g., the squaring of the height or amplitude of a wave] of a feeling [e.g. emotions are at the 5 - 8cps theta brain wave frequency, which is also this reality’s base resonant frequency]).

This interval of unconsciousness (1.5) would be the basis for the interconnectedness and telepathic agreement between all worldly phenomena whose natural base resonant frequencies vibrate within a narrow bandwidth of 5 - 8cps, or meters. This natural resonant frequency range coincides with our human theta (5 - 8cps) brain wave clusters.

 
I don’t know, but maybe I am just too dumb to understand - but to me it sounds a lot like garbage (not that I am very literate in physics either). But the author seems to take all sorts of disparate things and connects them via some numerical coincidences - which reminds me of Umberto Eco’s passage in Foucault’s Pendulum:

“I believe the universe is a great symphony of numerical correspondences, I believe that numbers and their symbolism provide a path to special knowledge. But if the world, below and above, is a system of correspondences where tout se tient, it’s natural for the kiosk and pyramid, both works of man, to reproduce in their structure, unconsciously, the harmonies of the cosmos. The so-called pyramidologists discover with their incredibly torturous methods a straightforward truth, a truth far more ancient, and one already known. It is the logic of research and discovery that is tortuous, because it is the logic of science. Whereas the logic of knowledge needs no discovery, because it knows already. Why must it demonstrate that which could not be otherwise? If there is a secret, it is much more profound.”
- Umberto Eco, Foucault’s Pendulum

Anyway, my 2 cents
 
Sounds like a load of salad shooter metaphysics masquerading as physics.

But you knew I would say that, didn't you?

Why?

Because you already knew it yourself.
 
Sounds like a load of salad shooter metaphysics masquerading as physics.

But you knew I would say that, didn't you?

Why?

Because you already knew it yourself.
Well after learning the truth about the Urantia Book and Nassim Haramein, I am wary of such "industrious" and "impressive" revelations. But as a believer in physics and meta-physics, "hope springs eternal" that those two fields can converge into coherent explanations like this seems to be at first glance.
 
Well after learning the truth about the Urantia Book and Nassim Haramein, I am wary of such "industrious" and "impressive" revelations. But as a believer in physics and meta-physics, "hope springs eternal" that those two fields can converge into coherent explanations like this seems to be at first glance.

Well, I'm the same way, truth be told. I was quite taken with the beginnings of Transurfing.
 
I've somewhat observed Nassim Haramein work over the years (since Klaus Dona has associated himself with him) and frankly speaking, I'm rather annoyed by (what seems to me, to be) his make believe science and conclusions, which has rather little to do with objectivity IMO. Rather than viewing his theories as possibilities that could be dead wrong, he seems to believe in them like a gospel which leads him to interpret many things in favor of his ideas.
 
Well after learning the truth about the Urantia Book and Nassim Haramein, I am wary of such "industrious" and "impressive" revelations. But as a believer in physics and meta-physics, "hope springs eternal" that those two fields can converge into coherent explanations like this seems to be at first glance.
Haramein has to know he is selling lots of not true ideas but he unfortunately seems more interested in the selling than the truth. That said I have seen people throw out a possibly good idea. when criticizing Haramein in that there is a possibly good idea from Sidharth relating black holes to fundamental particles:


The starting point of this model was the fact that the purely classical Kerr-Newman Black Hole describes the electron’s field including the purely Quantum Mechanical g=2 factor. However there are two inexplicable features. The first is the naked singularity of the Kerr-Newman Black Hole, if it is to represent an electron. The second is the complex coordinate shift used by Newman in deducing the Kerr-Newman metric, which Newman himself could not explain. It was pointed out [8, 9, 10] that there is a spacetime cutoff, at the Compton scale (l, τ) exactly as in the case of Dirac’s non Hermitian position operator for the electron.

As for Long and illusion and octaves, etc., if he had mentioned fire, earth, air, and water then that would have been as close to something good as he got. As Laura has mentioned, it's an early version of information theory. The illusion thing kind of alludes to us being information rather than materialism based. Consciousness is really just bound information. Octaves are really just an information scheme. Mathematical physics is an information scheme. Sacred geometry is an information scheme thus you can use the Enneagram and Zodiac for a personality model; the Sefirot descriptions are quite personality related too.

If you want to do physics, starting with X-Y-Z-T is easier than using fire, earth, air, and water or thinking, feeling, sensation, and intuition. You usually need more than four bits; something like six or eight is good.
 
At first glance, his explanations look like a bunch of conjectures that are all over the place. It would be one thing to continually give real world examples of why what you are saying may be true but with what's written you have to take everything at face value.

Also using a lot of multi-syllable words when explaining something to an audience that isn't familiar with your field usually means you're not saying much if anything at all. The incompetence can be masked with big, seemingly appropriate words, that are stitched together in an awkward manner.

Paraphrasing Neil deGrasse Tyson in his Masterclass

Being 'right' is less important than communicating your findings. If you cannot explain your understandings in a coherent manner to those that do not have your same realizations or context, what you're saying doesn't really matter.

The above even includes people in the same field. This doesn't mean you have to know exactly what someone is talking about to identify whether or not they are using a rational thought process.
 
At first glance, his explanations look like a bunch of conjectures that are all over the place. It would be one thing to continually give real world examples of why what you are saying may be true but with what's written you have to take everything at face value.

Also using a lot of multi-syllable words when explaining something to an audience that isn't familiar with your field usually means you're not saying much if anything at all. The incompetence can be masked with big, seemingly appropriate words, that are stitched together in an awkward manner.

Paraphrasing Neil deGrasse Tyson in his Masterclass



The above even includes people in the same field. This doesn't mean you have to know exactly what someone is talking about to identify whether or not they are using a rational thought process.

Exactly. Ark says if you can't explain it to a 5 year old, you don't know it.
 
At first glance, his explanations look like a bunch of conjectures that are all over the place. It would be one thing to continually give real world examples of why what you are saying may be true but with what's written you have to take everything at face value.

Also using a lot of multi-syllable words when explaining something to an audience that isn't familiar with your field usually means you're not saying much if anything at all. The incompetence can be masked with big, seemingly appropriate words, that are stitched together in an awkward manner.

Paraphrasing Neil deGrasse Tyson in his Masterclass



The above even includes people in the same field. This doesn't mean you have to know exactly what someone is talking about to identify whether or not they are using a rational thought process.
Yeah, I have good reading comprehension, even at a graduate level, but due to many mathematics or physics concepts, I was unable to grasp anything other than the vaguest notion of what he was saying. And those ideas and connections were fascinating, which is why I made this post inquiring if the math and physics made sense to those with better technical comprehension. Yes, it does come across as "word salad" but unfortunately physics also sounds like word salad to me.
 
After reading this thread I bought the kindle version of "The Psyche as interaction: electromagnetic patterns of conscious energy" and have read through it.

I actually found it quite fascinating.

The whole point of the book is to " [demonstrate] the correlation between planets, angles, astrological signs, colors, musical intervals and note frequencies, senses, molecular structures, elements, the bonding strengths of the electron shells' sublevels and the binding nuclear strengths of the neutrons and protons and chakras as harmonic intervals (numerical ratios) of the electromagnetic spectrum."
It's all given in charts in the rear part of the book.

Those who can make something out of books like Crowleys' Liber 777, could find it worthwhile to have a look at this.

Of course one could also spent the time reading Umberto Eco instead.
 
PS: The physics in the book are 'valid' insofar as they are all theories by different scientists the autor uses to 'connect dots' between these and psychology archetypes, myth/fairytales and mathematics.
 
Back
Top Bottom