The Divine Couple

Mike

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I thought about posting this in the ‘Romance Novel’ thread, since it has so many connections to that project, but felt having a separate thread was probably much more appropriate. Figure a link to this thread could be provided there if others feel it is appropriate.

Note: I also thought about doing a full review of Goddess worship before the male dominator monotheistic religions took over and also a review of the male dominator monotheistic religious concept before posting this, but figured I’d never write this post if I did. I also figure that Laura’s SHOTW is a good place to start for those subjects. I would like to read more about Goddess worship though and will try to find the best books available on this, but I can’t let myself order 10 more books when I have SO many already waiting to be read. Finally, maybe the general concept I propose below has been written about somewhere, but I don’t remember it and couldn’t find anything along the lines of what I propose below.

‘The Divine Couple’

I have been thinking about “karmic and simple understandings”, reading some of the romance novels, thinking about relationships, and reflecting on some of the insights I have had in relation to this to me personally. I plan to write some thoughts on my insights in relation to the romance novels and myself at some point.

But one day a couple months ago I also started to have some very abstract ideas and thoughts in relation to the romance novels, since they ultimately sparked the ideas below, and how the stories, template or templates within the stories, and understandings about oneself, relationships, and life that may come from reading these novels may apply in some way to the highest universal level, and the novels overall that we have been directed to may be a representation of same to some degree. A kind of “As Above, so Below” take on things.

These thoughts center around the idea that in terms of “As Above”, instead of just a singular ‘God’ and ‘Cosmic mind’ making up ‘The One’, that the C’s have referred to, that there is also a ‘Cosmic heart’ and ‘Goddess’ that in union with ‘God/Cosmic mind’ forms, via a duality, what makes up ‘The One’. The King and the Queen – ‘The Divine Couple’ of creation. The Father and Mother of the universe and creation. The Yin and Yang. This being the highest representation of the Masculine principle and Feminine principle in union. And this union created or ‘birthed’ the universe/reality and also the material universe (the universal body) in all of its manifestations. And this union also maintains these for the purpose of ‘raising’ beings or souls up to their level through the school of creation to be part of the ‘Divine Family’ and ‘in union with the One’ or to be in union with the ‘One family’ or the ‘Divine Family’.

In terms of this abstraction and the cosmic drama of the ‘Divine Couple’, Act I is the ‘dance’ and eventual mating of the couple toward their union, the birthing of the universe and reality and the beings to raise in it, and is represented by the romance novels we have been reading. For the romance novels, the man and woman, in the varied and assorted stories and the varied situations and conditions these men and women are in, meeting, being changed in so many ways by this meeting and interaction, interacting from a deep attraction and the physical, energetic expression of sexual interactions which comes from the attraction, falling in love during the process and finding a deeper meaning to life with this other person that is the springboard to change for the better for each person and also growing from the interaction in so many ways, and a lot of times by the end of the story the couple has a child that seems to complete them and give fuller meaning to their relationship. Could there have been a ‘dance’ like this, in the abstract sense, for the proposed ‘Divine Couple’ – the God and Goddess meeting, interacting, falling in love and mating to produce the Universe? Is the creation of the Universe and reality in essence a cosmic love story? Could this be in part what is so powerful about the romance novels and why it is such an important project?

I also have thought of an Act II and Act III. Act II is raising the ‘child/children’ by the couple in the school of creation and Act III is when the child is he or herself grown and perpetuates the cycle of the ‘Divine Couple’ by being an adult, finding another, falling in love with another, and then having his or her own children. More on Act II, Act III and the C’s cosmology and the C’s material overall, and likely Act I, in relation to this in future posts.

This conceptualized duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ would be in addition to the Service to Others (STO) and Service to Self (STS) duality that is an integral part of the cosmology formulated with respect to the C’s and the Cassiopaean Experiment. And what concerns us here is the path of STO with respect to the possible abstract duality of the ‘Divine couple’ and returning to be ‘in union with the One’. I’d imagine there are likely aspects of this that may apply to the STS path, but I have no interest in thinking about and exploring such thoughts and possibilities. Sure, STS is a path a being can take. A valid option that the universe provides in creation, and can even be seen as required to be provided as an option in order for the universe and reality to function as a school. BUT that STS path, and the total selfishness, self-centeredness, and total lack of focus on and consideration for others that 6D STS and leading to it might represent, won’t deliver beings on that path to be part of the abstract proposition of the ‘Divine Family’ and making it to 7D. It will only lead to estrangement from the ‘Divine Family’ and outside it in the end. It is an path that can be taken, but it leads in the end away from others and not in union with them.

Maybe, since learning about romantic interpersonal relationships and connections may be one of the most important things we can encounter and learn about and struggle with in life (and come to think of it, another important thing is learning overall about parents and family, etc and this is represented in the romance novels) and also can be used to learn about life and ourselves, that this could be the “so Below” that is a reflection of the “As Above”. Even if this learning takes place through the romance novels and in the absent former or current romantic relationships, it is something very important, maybe universally so, to experience, reflect on, and learn about. And also, that the romance novels give the ability to experience so many variations of the theme for a person to learn from, which they wouldn’t otherwise experience in one life, as noted by others in the romance thread. Maybe reading a large number of the novels provides more of a universal perspective and conceptualization this is important, which comes from thinking about and reflecting on the various themes and things a person can learn from them about people and oneself. And this maybe connects to my ‘Divine Couple’ conceptualization. And finally, both the proposed “as Above” and also the “so Below” male and female and coupling to produce offspring is also reflected in the material reality and throughout nature that we can observe in 3D. Maybe it is a reflection of something higher?

Maybe my abstract analogy of the ‘Divine Couple’ only goes so far and is really off the mark, since from our level and very limited ability to conceptualize and understand something like 7D/’The One’, let only much ‘above’ 3D, can we even come close with an analogy to describe it? This quote in the ‘OP session’ with the C’s maybe gives some direction in relation to this and I thought of it when thinking about the ideas in relation to the ‘Divine Couple’.

Q: Does the recharging of the souled being come from a similar pool, only maybe the “human” pool?

A: No — it recharges from the so-called sexual center which is a higher center of creative energy. During sleep, the emotional center, not being blocked by the lower intellectual center and the moving center, transduces the energy from the sexual center. It is also the time during which the higher emotional and intellectual centers can rest from the “drain” of the lower centers’ interaction with those pesky organic portals so much loved by the lower centers. This respite alone is sufficient to make a difference. But, more than that, the energy of the sexual center is also more available to the other higher centers.

Q: From where does the so-called “sexual center” get ITS energy?

A: The sexual center is in direct contact with 7th density in its “feminine” creative thought of “Thou, I Love.” The “outbreath” of “God” in the relief of constriction. Pulsation. Unstable Gravity Waves.

One thought is that the abstract concept of the duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ might relate to ‘Third Man principle’ or theme. The addition, or third, to the duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ being the ‘children’/beings of the ‘Divine Couple’, which completes the theme. Will have to add a review of what Laura has written about this as something to look at and explore.

Finally, my mom passed away a year ago today. I once referred to her as the ‘High Queen of the Universe’. I was off my rocker then and maybe I still am… Love you Mama Bear! 😍

 

iamthatis

Jedi Council Member
FOTCM Member
I thought about posting this in the ‘Romance Novel’ thread, since it has so many connections to that project, but felt having a separate thread was probably much more appropriate. Figure a link to this thread could be provided there if others feel it is appropriate.

Note: I also thought about doing a full review of Goddess worship before the male dominator monotheistic religions took over and also a review of the male dominator monotheistic religious concept before posting this, but figured I’d never write this post if I did. I also figure that Laura’s SHOTW is a good place to start for those subjects. I would like to read more about Goddess worship though and will try to find the best books available on this, but I can’t let myself order 10 more books when I have SO many already waiting to be read. Finally, maybe the general concept I propose below has been written about somewhere, but I don’t remember it and couldn’t find anything along the lines of what I propose below.

‘The Divine Couple’

I have been thinking about “karmic and simple understandings”, reading some of the romance novels, thinking about relationships, and reflecting on some of the insights I have had in relation to this to me personally. I plan to write some thoughts on my insights in relation to the romance novels and myself at some point.

But one day a couple months ago I also started to have some very abstract ideas and thoughts in relation to the romance novels, since they ultimately sparked the ideas below, and how the stories, template or templates within the stories, and understandings about oneself, relationships, and life that may come from reading these novels may apply in some way to the highest universal level, and the novels overall that we have been directed to may be a representation of same to some degree. A kind of “As Above, so Below” take on things.

These thoughts center around the idea that in terms of “As Above”, instead of just a singular ‘God’ and ‘Cosmic mind’ making up ‘The One’, that the C’s have referred to, that there is also a ‘Cosmic heart’ and ‘Goddess’ that in union with ‘God/Cosmic mind’ forms, via a duality, what makes up ‘The One’. The King and the Queen – ‘The Divine Couple’ of creation. The Father and Mother of the universe and creation. The Yin and Yang. This being the highest representation of the Masculine principle and Feminine principle in union. And this union created or ‘birthed’ the universe/reality and also the material universe (the universal body) in all of its manifestations. And this union also maintains these for the purpose of ‘raising’ beings or souls up to their level through the school of creation to be part of the ‘Divine Family’ and ‘in union with the One’ or to be in union with the ‘One family’ or the ‘Divine Family’.

In terms of this abstraction and the cosmic drama of the ‘Divine Couple’, Act I is the ‘dance’ and eventual mating of the couple toward their union, the birthing of the universe and reality and the beings to raise in it, and is represented by the romance novels we have been reading. For the romance novels, the man and woman, in the varied and assorted stories and the varied situations and conditions these men and women are in, meeting, being changed in so many ways by this meeting and interaction, interacting from a deep attraction and the physical, energetic expression of sexual interactions which comes from the attraction, falling in love during the process and finding a deeper meaning to life with this other person that is the springboard to change for the better for each person and also growing from the interaction in so many ways, and a lot of times by the end of the story the couple has a child that seems to complete them and give fuller meaning to their relationship. Could there have been a ‘dance’ like this, in the abstract sense, for the proposed ‘Divine Couple’ – the God and Goddess meeting, interacting, falling in love and mating to produce the Universe? Is the creation of the Universe and reality in essence a cosmic love story? Could this be in part what is so powerful about the romance novels and why it is such an important project?

I also have thought of an Act II and Act III. Act II is raising the ‘child/children’ by the couple in the school of creation and Act III is when the child is he or herself grown and perpetuates the cycle of the ‘Divine Couple’ by being an adult, finding another, falling in love with another, and then having his or her own children. More on Act II, Act III and the C’s cosmology and the C’s material overall, and likely Act I, in relation to this in future posts.

This conceptualized duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ would be in addition to the Service to Others (STO) and Service to Self (STS) duality that is an integral part of the cosmology formulated with respect to the C’s and the Cassiopaean Experiment. And what concerns us here is the path of STO with respect to the possible abstract duality of the ‘Divine couple’ and returning to be ‘in union with the One’. I’d imagine there are likely aspects of this that may apply to the STS path, but I have no interest in thinking about and exploring such thoughts and possibilities. Sure, STS is a path a being can take. A valid option that the universe provides in creation, and can even be seen as required to be provided as an option in order for the universe and reality to function as a school. BUT that STS path, and the total selfishness, self-centeredness, and total lack of focus on and consideration for others that 6D STS and leading to it might represent, won’t deliver beings on that path to be part of the abstract proposition of the ‘Divine Family’ and making it to 7D. It will only lead to estrangement from the ‘Divine Family’ and outside it in the end. It is an path that can be taken, but it leads in the end away from others and not in union with them.

Maybe, since learning about romantic interpersonal relationships and connections may be one of the most important things we can encounter and learn about and struggle with in life (and come to think of it, another important thing is learning overall about parents and family, etc and this is represented in the romance novels) and also can be used to learn about life and ourselves, that this could be the “so Below” that is a reflection of the “As Above”. Even if this learning takes place through the romance novels and in the absent former or current romantic relationships, it is something very important, maybe universally so, to experience, reflect on, and learn about. And also, that the romance novels give the ability to experience so many variations of the theme for a person to learn from, which they wouldn’t otherwise experience in one life, as noted by others in the romance thread. Maybe reading a large number of the novels provides more of a universal perspective and conceptualization this is important, which comes from thinking about and reflecting on the various themes and things a person can learn from them about people and oneself. And this maybe connects to my ‘Divine Couple’ conceptualization. And finally, both the proposed “as Above” and also the “so Below” male and female and coupling to produce offspring is also reflected in the material reality and throughout nature that we can observe in 3D. Maybe it is a reflection of something higher?

Maybe my abstract analogy of the ‘Divine Couple’ only goes so far and is really off the mark, since from our level and very limited ability to conceptualize and understand something like 7D/’The One’, let only much ‘above’ 3D, can we even come close with an analogy to describe it? This quote in the ‘OP session’ with the C’s maybe gives some direction in relation to this and I thought of it when thinking about the ideas in relation to the ‘Divine Couple’.



One thought is that the abstract concept of the duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ might relate to ‘Third Man principle’ or theme. The addition, or third, to the duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ being the ‘children’/beings of the ‘Divine Couple’, which completes the theme. Will have to add a review of what Laura has written about this as something to look at and explore.

Finally, my mom passed away a year ago today. I once referred to her as the ‘High Queen of the Universe’. I was off my rocker then and maybe I still am… Love you Mama Bear! 😍


This is such a great post. Thank you! Will definitely re-read and ponder.
 

Mike

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
This is such a great post. Thank you! Will definitely re-read and ponder.

You're welcome. I like the idea, since it makes me feel good in a way, but don't know if it is correct or has any connection with reality. The concept makes logical sense to me given pieces of data, such as the romance novel project and discussion and some C's communications. One such piece of data from the C's that I thought about that helped to form my conceptualization is this quote.

23 Oct 1994 said:
Q: (L) Where did the souls come from that entered into the bodies on the planet earth? Were they in bodies on other planets before they came here?

A: Not this group.

Q: (L) Were they just floating around in the universe somewhere?

A: In union with the One. Have you heard the Super ancient legend of Lucifer, the Fallen Angel?

Q: (L) Who is Lucifer?

A: You. The human race.

Q: (L) Are the souls of individual humans the parts of a larger soul?

A: Yes. Close. The One. All who have fallen must learn "the hard way."


Q: (L) Are you saying that the act of wanting to experience physical reality is the act of falling?

A: You are members of a fragmented soul unit.

Q: (L) What is it about wanting to be physical is a "fall"?

A: Pleasure for the self.
 

BHelmet

The Living Force
Very interesting. All theories and abstractions are vulnerable to idealization. The reality on the ground may be quite another story.

I am aware of the ideas and concepts but all I really have to go on is my own experience. My best guest is that I foolishly ran away in fear from my polar opposite. But I was lucky enough to land one of my 3 legitimate Spouses that Mouravieff mentions. Note-he doesn’t give much detail.

That said, it is my opinion that anybody who thinks ANY relationship, even if divinely inspired, is a carefree cakewalk in the park is misguided. Great relationships, challenge us to grow. And that can mean some serious challenges.

I am aware I could be biased and completely in err. It is easy to think “why is this such a struggle? It must not be right”. And how many other seemingly happy couples do we see who look like they are happier and working better together than we?

But then how many do we see break up and split apart and we are shocked? I often ask myself why I/we keep steadfastly working at it when the breakthroughs are difficult to achieve and require much patience.

Then there is that opposite thingy. The opposition creates an overwhelming intense attraction but it also guarantees some massively frustrating conflict: the super hot crucible. (Which is a necessity to melt and allow the interior core to re-fuse)

It’s an ongoing process. The missed polar opposite leaves me with some deep and heavy “what if’s”. Ultimately I was afraid of betrayal: either by her or by me. I was afraid of emotional pain, lacking in trust and I ran away.

But that disastrous failure redoubles my strength to not give up now. There IS a certain kind of salvation available in these relationship scenarios as it involves dedicating your self to another. If both people have the same dedication, it can be a beautiful if maddening endeavor.
 

Mike

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
gottathink said:
Are you also referring to the concept of polar-opposite relationships?

Not specifically with what I wrote.

But it is an item that crossed my mind as possibly related to the conceptualization. And "on the list" to review to include what Mouravieff writes in the Gnosis trilogy that relates to the polar-opposites the C's mention and have been written about by Laura. It has been some time since I've read about or thought about such things.
 

Cass

The Force is Strong With This One
I thought about posting this in the ‘Romance Novel’ thread, since it has so many connections to that project, but felt having a separate thread was probably much more appropriate. Figure a link to this thread could be provided there if others feel it is appropriate.

Note: I also thought about doing a full review of Goddess worship before the male dominator monotheistic religions took over and also a review of the male dominator monotheistic religious concept before posting this, but figured I’d never write this post if I did. I also figure that Laura’s SHOTW is a good place to start for those subjects. I would like to read more about Goddess worship though and will try to find the best books available on this, but I can’t let myself order 10 more books when I have SO many already waiting to be read. Finally, maybe the general concept I propose below has been written about somewhere, but I don’t remember it and couldn’t find anything along the lines of what I propose below.

‘The Divine Couple’

I have been thinking about “karmic and simple understandings”, reading some of the romance novels, thinking about relationships, and reflecting on some of the insights I have had in relation to this to me personally. I plan to write some thoughts on my insights in relation to the romance novels and myself at some point.

But one day a couple months ago I also started to have some very abstract ideas and thoughts in relation to the romance novels, since they ultimately sparked the ideas below, and how the stories, template or templates within the stories, and understandings about oneself, relationships, and life that may come from reading these novels may apply in some way to the highest universal level, and the novels overall that we have been directed to may be a representation of same to some degree. A kind of “As Above, so Below” take on things.

These thoughts center around the idea that in terms of “As Above”, instead of just a singular ‘God’ and ‘Cosmic mind’ making up ‘The One’, that the C’s have referred to, that there is also a ‘Cosmic heart’ and ‘Goddess’ that in union with ‘God/Cosmic mind’ forms, via a duality, what makes up ‘The One’. The King and the Queen – ‘The Divine Couple’ of creation. The Father and Mother of the universe and creation. The Yin and Yang. This being the highest representation of the Masculine principle and Feminine principle in union. And this union created or ‘birthed’ the universe/reality and also the material universe (the universal body) in all of its manifestations. And this union also maintains these for the purpose of ‘raising’ beings or souls up to their level through the school of creation to be part of the ‘Divine Family’ and ‘in union with the One’ or to be in union with the ‘One family’ or the ‘Divine Family’.

In terms of this abstraction and the cosmic drama of the ‘Divine Couple’, Act I is the ‘dance’ and eventual mating of the couple toward their union, the birthing of the universe and reality and the beings to raise in it, and is represented by the romance novels we have been reading. For the romance novels, the man and woman, in the varied and assorted stories and the varied situations and conditions these men and women are in, meeting, being changed in so many ways by this meeting and interaction, interacting from a deep attraction and the physical, energetic expression of sexual interactions which comes from the attraction, falling in love during the process and finding a deeper meaning to life with this other person that is the springboard to change for the better for each person and also growing from the interaction in so many ways, and a lot of times by the end of the story the couple has a child that seems to complete them and give fuller meaning to their relationship. Could there have been a ‘dance’ like this, in the abstract sense, for the proposed ‘Divine Couple’ – the God and Goddess meeting, interacting, falling in love and mating to produce the Universe? Is the creation of the Universe and reality in essence a cosmic love story? Could this be in part what is so powerful about the romance novels and why it is such an important project?

I also have thought of an Act II and Act III. Act II is raising the ‘child/children’ by the couple in the school of creation and Act III is when the child is he or herself grown and perpetuates the cycle of the ‘Divine Couple’ by being an adult, finding another, falling in love with another, and then having his or her own children. More on Act II, Act III and the C’s cosmology and the C’s material overall, and likely Act I, in relation to this in future posts.

This conceptualized duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ would be in addition to the Service to Others (STO) and Service to Self (STS) duality that is an integral part of the cosmology formulated with respect to the C’s and the Cassiopaean Experiment. And what concerns us here is the path of STO with respect to the possible abstract duality of the ‘Divine couple’ and returning to be ‘in union with the One’. I’d imagine there are likely aspects of this that may apply to the STS path, but I have no interest in thinking about and exploring such thoughts and possibilities. Sure, STS is a path a being can take. A valid option that the universe provides in creation, and can even be seen as required to be provided as an option in order for the universe and reality to function as a school. BUT that STS path, and the total selfishness, self-centeredness, and total lack of focus on and consideration for others that 6D STS and leading to it might represent, won’t deliver beings on that path to be part of the abstract proposition of the ‘Divine Family’ and making it to 7D. It will only lead to estrangement from the ‘Divine Family’ and outside it in the end. It is an path that can be taken, but it leads in the end away from others and not in union with them.

Maybe, since learning about romantic interpersonal relationships and connections may be one of the most important things we can encounter and learn about and struggle with in life (and come to think of it, another important thing is learning overall about parents and family, etc and this is represented in the romance novels) and also can be used to learn about life and ourselves, that this could be the “so Below” that is a reflection of the “As Above”. Even if this learning takes place through the romance novels and in the absent former or current romantic relationships, it is something very important, maybe universally so, to experience, reflect on, and learn about. And also, that the romance novels give the ability to experience so many variations of the theme for a person to learn from, which they wouldn’t otherwise experience in one life, as noted by others in the romance thread. Maybe reading a large number of the novels provides more of a universal perspective and conceptualization this is important, which comes from thinking about and reflecting on the various themes and things a person can learn from them about people and oneself. And this maybe connects to my ‘Divine Couple’ conceptualization. And finally, both the proposed “as Above” and also the “so Below” male and female and coupling to produce offspring is also reflected in the material reality and throughout nature that we can observe in 3D. Maybe it is a reflection of something higher?

Maybe my abstract analogy of the ‘Divine Couple’ only goes so far and is really off the mark, since from our level and very limited ability to conceptualize and understand something like 7D/’The One’, let only much ‘above’ 3D, can we even come close with an analogy to describe it? This quote in the ‘OP session’ with the C’s maybe gives some direction in relation to this and I thought of it when thinking about the ideas in relation to the ‘Divine Couple’.



One thought is that the abstract concept of the duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ might relate to ‘Third Man principle’ or theme. The addition, or third, to the duality of the ‘Divine Couple’ being the ‘children’/beings of the ‘Divine Couple’, which completes the theme. Will have to add a review of what Laura has written about this as something to look at and explore.

Finally, my mom passed away a year ago today. I once referred to her as the ‘High Queen of the Universe’. I was off my rocker then and maybe I still am… Love you Mama Bear! 😍

Well, perhaps the wishful thinking and the ego are necessary to advance as long as they fulfill their specific function in our walk, our behaviors according to our condition in consciousness and in balance as presented in Laura's material on "the parable of the chariot", Likewise and as for the degree of superficial love that encompasses touch, desire, service to oneself can include other spheres in the mystical love that goes beyond human experience and the desire for selfish pleasure so that the divine partner is no longer veiled to the illusory human concepts.
 

Joe

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
That said, it is my opinion that anybody who thinks ANY relationship, even if divinely inspired, is a carefree cakewalk in the park is misguided. Great relationships, challenge us to grow. And that can mean some serious challenges.

For sure. Just like all other areas of life itself. All life does, or should, serve growth, which implies change, which is difficult. That growth primarily involves interaction with other people. The closer your interactions with another, the more intense the challenges to grow can be. It seems the core of those challenges involve knowing and understanding yourself, knowing and understanding another, and putting another before yourself to a degree that most are not used to. But to do that requires knowledge to be gained on different levels, and that knowledge must be acquired, because no one has it to start with. Acquiring that knowledge usually involves struggle and some amount of suffering.

It’s an ongoing process. The missed polar opposite leaves me with some deep and heavy “what if’s”. Ultimately I was afraid of betrayal: either by her or by me. I was afraid of emotional pain, lacking in trust and I ran away.

The polar opposite thing is an interesting concept. A lot of people think of a polar opposite as someone who is a "perfect fit" or "perfect match" for them. They conceive a relationship with such a person as being mostly problem-free, where they are always perfectly understood. But that removes the opportunity (and in most people, requirement) for the growth and change that are the product of the problems.

I tend to think that polar opposites don't really exist in a preformed way, but can be 'made' if there is the right match on some basic aspects of nature between two people and then both are willing to work on ironing out the problems within themselves and the other. Doing that often takes a fair amount of effort and suffering, and many aren't willing to stick at it. Those that ARE, for some reason, willing to stick at it, perhaps have something ineffable between them that could be called "true love". From that perspective, there are potentially many polar opposites out there for anyone.
 
Last edited:

Cass

The Force is Strong With This One
For sure. Just like all other areas of life itself. All life does, or should, serve growth, which implies change, which is difficult. That growth primarily involves interaction with other people. The closer your interactions with another, the more intense the challenges to grow can be. It seems the core of those challenges involve knowing and understanding yourself, knowing and understanding another, and putting another before yourself to a degree that most are not used to. But to do that requires knowledge to be gained on different levels, and that knowledge must be acquired, because no one has it to start with. Acquiring that knowledge usually involves struggle and some amount of suffering.



The polar opposite thing is an interesting concept. A lot of people think of a polar opposite as someone who is a "perfect fit" or "perfect match" for them. They conceive a relationship with such a person as being mostly problem-free, where they are always perfectly understood. But that removes the opportunity (and in most people, requirement) for the growth and change that are the product of the problems.

I tend to think that polar opposites don't really exist in a preformed way, but can be 'made' if there is the right match on some basic aspects of nature between two people and then both are willing to work on ironing out the problems within themselves and the other. Doing that often takes a fair amount of effort and suffering, and many aren't willing to stick at it. Those that ARE, for some reason, willing to stick at it, perhaps have something ineffable between them that could be called "true love". From that perspective, there are potentially many polar opposites out there for anyone.
In every process of personal growth / from the approach of the development and construction of the soul, there are a series of elements (+ and -) where the individual goes through stages and processes, it is clear that a magnetic center is developed in the continuous interaction as Joe says, and yes there are a series of neurochemicals that are carried out in the activation and deactivation of genes in the DNA and the restructuring of codons in the organism, I could then say that qualitatively such a person begins to crystallize more and more that magnetic center of power giving the result of the fusion of the soul with the genetics and also if we take into account the creativity the feminine creative potential in latent balance with the masculine we have the androgynous being. We also have what Pierre said about the proteins (the hair) as antennas and it is precisely our antenna that the elite wants to damage so much to avoid our awakening. Greetings to you Joe.
 
Top Bottom