Superjet-100 crash-lands, catches fire at major Moscow airport

Current fallout's from this incident.


Russian regional carrier Yamal Airlines will cancel a planned purchase of 10 Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft, a day after one of the commuter jets operated by Aeroflot fatally crash-landed at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport.

Yamal announced its decision on Monday, after Russia’s transport minister declined to ground the aircraft in response to the accident.

Yamal’s decision to drop the plane is said to be unconnected to Sunday’s accident. General Director Vasily Kryuk told Russian news agency TASS that servicing costs on the narrow-body Superjet 100 are too high.

A Superjet 100 belonging to Aeroflot crash-landed in a blaze of fire and smoke at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo International Airport on Sunday.

The plane had departed Sheremetyevo for Murmansk, but pilots declared an emergency on board and returned to Moscow, with the plane bursting into flames upon a hard landing. A total of 40 passengers and one crew member died in the tragedy.

Yamal operates 15 of the planes, and is Russia’s second-largest Superjet 100 operator after national flag carrier Aeroflot.

And a very intersting development.

And a current press release from Hahn Air
Hahn Air Lines’ Chief Development Officer - Flight Operations, confirms participation at Routes Silk Road 2019.
9 May 2019
Routes Silk Road 2019, the route development forum for the CIS, Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Central Asia, will bring together key decision makers from the region’s airlines, airports and tourism authorities for face-to-face meetings, networking opportunities and the conference programme.

Taking place 15-17 July 2019 in Nur-Sultan, the Routes conference programme will feature talks and panel discussions by senior industry experts. Simon Riha, Chief Development Officer - Flight Operations at Hahn Air Lines, will also take to the stage to discuss “Connecting East to West - hub development, bilaterals with Asia and Europe, and Asian growth”.

Other topics to be addressed over the course of the programme include catering for the Russian market, the latest trends in route development in China, and how small airports can raise their profile. More information about the event can be found here.
 
The pilot of the SSJ-100 Denis Yevdokimov has described the situation as follows (machine translation from Russian):

None of that explains the ridiculous bounce on landing. If it was a normal approach at normal speed, and the only problem was radio communication, why did the plane effectively take off again after a "normal" landing. Either the pilot is lying or he is an extremely bad pilot that cannot properly land a plane.

i believe it is the unburned fuel that led to excess mass - the plane is not actually designed to land right after flying off, it has to burn tons and tons of fuel before it has a lower mass safe for the landing gear to absorb landing impact. He would probably have had to land with normal horizontal speed but even less vertical drop rate, which would probably require finer control than could reasonably be expected in this situation.
 
i believe it is the unburned fuel that led to excess mass - the plane is not actually designed to land right after flying off, it has to burn tons and tons of fuel before it has a lower mass safe for the landing gear to absorb landing impact. He would probably have had to land with normal horizontal speed but even less vertical drop rate, which would probably require finer control than could reasonably be expected in this situation.

Yes I agree with this.

The Russian news agency Interfax report indicates that fuel tanks were full as crew made the decision that it was too dangerous to dump fuel over Moscow.

This is also interesting -


A flight attendant said there was a sharp flash soon after the Aeroflot flight took off, bound for the northern city of Murmansk.

“We took off, got into a cloud, there was strong hail, and at that moment there was a pop and some kind of flash, like electricity,” Tatiana Kasatnika said in a video posted on YouTube.
 
Last edited:
Snip 5-6 minutes Read / Plus Tweets
For some in the West, any death of a prominent journalist in Russia seems to be only a fortunate opportunity to speculate that he or she must have been an enemy of the Kremlin and died because of it.

The latest person to fall victim to this trend is Sergey Dorenko, who suddenly died on Thursday while out on a motorcycle ride.
"Anti-Putin journalist dies in mysterious motorbike accident days after criticizing Russian authorities over fatal plane crash," the Daily Mail chose to headline its report on Dorenko’s death.


The usual Russiagaters were quick to chip in with anger and disbelief. Bill Browder, the internationally famous anti-Putin crusader, called Dorenko "one of Russia's most outspoken independent journalists and critics of the Putin regime."

"Putin will be Putin," Bild editor Julian Ropcke declared as he retweeted the story. He added a translation of an angry rant posted by Dorenko in the wake of last weekend’s Superjet crash.

"One of Dorenko's last posts. Deadly? Rest in peace."

1cf9f458d2a86ac5529e1cade09b5339.png


Good for Ropcke that the message he quoted didn't carry a date stamp. Otherwise his readers might have learned that it was posted right on the day of the tragedy, when the high death toll was suspected but not yet confirmed. Dorenko had posted no less than 59 messages on his channels after that "last post."

As for the Daily Mail’s insinuation that Putin's hitmen assassinated "Kremlin critic" for saying bad things about the Russian government, the autopsy has since shown that Dorenko suffered a ruptured aortic aneurysm. This was reported by the very radio station that he headed. It's a relatively rare and usually lethal condition.

For the sake of argument, let’s say the autopsy report can be falsified and the Kremlin did go after the journalist. The problem with that conspiracy theory is that Dorenko was not as critical of government policies as his colleagues at the Daily Mail and the “blame Russia” crowd want to believe.

The Mail paints a story of a brave no-nonsense reporter, who had spent years criticizing the Russian government. Dorenko was fired in 2000, after accusing the government and Vladimir Putin of lying about the causes of the Kursk nuclear submarine disaster. In 2007, he released footage of his 1998 interview with Alexander Litvinenko, who died in Britain from Polonium-210 poisoning. Days before his death he "attacked an effort to blame the crew for a disaster that many suspect is the fault of technical problems with the Sukhoi plane."

Conveniently omitted were some of Dorenko’s other statements and ideas that didn't fit the narrative. For instance, he was a vocal supporter of the decision to reintegrate Crimea after it broke away from Ukraine in 2014, prompting the Ukrainian press to call Dorenko a “top Russian propagandist.”

For the sake of argument, let’s say the autopsy report can be falsified and the Kremlin did go after the journalist. The problem with that conspiracy theory is that Dorenko was not as critical of government policies as his colleagues at the Daily Mail and the “blame Russia” crowd want to believe.

The Mail paints a story of a brave no-nonsense reporter, who had spent years criticizing the Russian government. Dorenko was fired in 2000, after accusing the government and Vladimir Putin of lying about the causes of the Kursk nuclear submarine disaster. In 2007, he released footage of his 1998 interview with Alexander Litvinenko, who died in Britain from Polonium-210 poisoning. Days before his death he "attacked an effort to blame the crew for a disaster that many suspect is the fault of technical problems with the Sukhoi plane."

Conveniently omitted were some of Dorenko’s other statements and ideas that didn't fit the narrative. For instance, he was a vocal supporter of the decision to reintegrate Crimea after it broke away from Ukraine in 2014, prompting the Ukrainian press to call Dorenko a “top Russian propagandist.”

For the sake of argument, let’s say the autopsy report can be falsified and the Kremlin did go after the journalist. The problem with that conspiracy theory is that Dorenko was not as critical of government policies as his colleagues at the Daily Mail and the “blame Russia” crowd want to believe.

The Mail paints a story of a brave no-nonsense reporter, who had spent years criticizing the Russian government. Dorenko was fired in 2000, after accusing the government and Vladimir Putin of lying about the causes of the Kursk nuclear submarine disaster. In 2007, he released footage of his 1998 interview with Alexander Litvinenko, who died in Britain from Polonium-210 poisoning. Days before his death he "attacked an effort to blame the crew for a disaster that many suspect is the fault of technical problems with the Sukhoi plane."

Conveniently omitted were some of Dorenko’s other statements and ideas that didn't fit the narrative. For instance, he was a vocal supporter of the decision to reintegrate Crimea after it broke away from Ukraine in 2014, prompting the Ukrainian press to call Dorenko a “top Russian propagandist.”

“Those who don't support Russia's position on Crimea lack both heart and intelligence,"
Dorenko had said on the issue. On another occasion he literally threatened to violate any American with a fire iron if challenged in his opinion that the cities of Donetsk, Lugansk and Kharkov in eastern Ukraine were "our land.” As for the tensions between Russia and Ukraine, he wrote: "We can inflict pain indefinitely until people say they have realized that there will be no Ukraine that stands against Russia. If we have to keep proving it for ten more years, we will."

Good luck printing those opinions in the Western press!

The actual Dorenko – not the Daily Mail-Browder-Roepcke construct – was a controversial figure on the Russian media scene. In the 1990s he was famous as a reputation hitman for oligarch, media mogul and shady power broker Boris Berezovsky. One of his jobs was to conduct relentless attacks at ex-PM Evgeny Primakov on behalf of a presidential candidate by the name of Vladimir Putin.

In one report he was explaining to viewers at length that Primakov's recent surgery at a private Swiss clinic must have cost hundreds of thousands of euros or maybe more, considering how old and frail the politician was.

Yes, there was his famous report on the Kursk disaster, in which he accused Putin of mishandling the crisis. "The authorities disrespect us all. That's why they lie. And more importantly, they treat us like that solely because we allow them," was how he wrapped up the report, and was indeed sacked after that.

Yet despite his often abrasive personal style and strong opinions, he remained part of the media establishment in Russia, not some fringe voice delivering online rants about “evil Putin.” He headed one of Moscow's biggest radio stations. What could possibly make him a target?


Dorenko was many things. What he was not is a stock character for anti-Putin conspiracy theory peddlers and outlets that never let the facts interfere with a good a clickbait headline.

Alexandre Antonov, RT
@alantonov
 


Opinion on the non dumping of the fuel tanks before the crash. The rest is armchair quarter backing with speculation, and prejudice!
He's from California, and follows the party line.

 
May 7, 2019 - SSJ-100 plane returned to tarmac due to failure of communication and autopilot systems

1220494.jpg

© Sergei Fadeichev/TASS

The Aeroflot SSJ-100 passenger plane, which crashed on May 5, returned to the airport due to a failure in communication and automated flight control systems, Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport’s press service informs.

According to the press service, the plane took off at 18:02, and at 18:12, the flight commander reported a failure in radio communication to the airport’s dispatch, requesting landing at the airport. At 18:13, the commander reported a failure in communication for the second time, adding that the plane’s automated flight system had malfunctioned as well. At 18:30, the plane landed at the Sheremetyevo tarmac, after which it caught fire.

In the minute following the plane’s landing, the emergency alert was issued and the plane’s emergency slides were deployed in order for the passengers to evacuate. The first two firefighting squads arrived at the crash site at 18:32, while four more approached the plane at 18:33. The airport rescue teams entered the burning plane at 18:35. The fire was fully extinguished at 18:48.

The press service informs that after the emergency alert is issued, the emergency and rescue teams must arrive at the crash site within three minutes. According to the airport, 26 emergency workers, one vehicle of the gas and smoke protection services, as well as 4 ambulances were involved in the rescue operation.


May 7, 2019 - Crashed SSJ-100 plane's flight recorder seriously damaged in Sheremetyevo airport incident
"The flight recorder was exposed to high temperatures and was seriously damaged. The voice recorder is in satisfactory condition," IAC said in a press statement posted on its official website.

According to IAC, the flight information was copied to be further decoded and analyzed. A preliminary report about the results of investigation into the accident will be issued within 30 days, IAC said.


May 6, 2019 - Ill-fated SSJ-100 passenger says he saw lightning striking plane’s engine two times

1220484.jpg

© Moscow News Agency photo via AP

The mayor of Severomorsk, a restricted-access city in Russia’s northwestern Murmansk region, who was onboard the ill-fated plane that crash landed at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport on Sunday, has told TASS he had seen lightning striking into the plane’s right-hand engine twice while the plane was in midair.

"I heard two loud whangs and turned my head to see two flashings near the right-hand engine. These were lightning strikes. But the engine did not caught fire, it caught fire later when the plane touched the ground, bounced and touched the ground again, i.e. after it hit the ground for the second time," said Vladimir Yevmenkov.

He said the evacuation had proceeded without panic, with the flight attendants being highly professional. "Until the plane stopped and while the flight attendants were opening the doors, people were standing in the aisle. It took some time. Should they have rushed to the door in panic we could hardly have survived," he noted, adding that there were problems with the left-hand emergency exit door and it was dark in the cabin.

"At first, only one emergency exit door was opened, on the right side, and only some time later the left-hand door was opened too. People were standing in the aisle letting those before them leave the plane. I did not smell any burning ordor. We did not see what was going on in the tail section. There was no light in the cabin but it was light outside," he recalled.
 
Last edited:


Translated from Russian by Microsoft
AUDIO: The SSJ pilot asks for an emergency landing at Sheremetyevo. "Loss of radio communication! Airplane Direct Mode "(term for direct control of an airplane without automation)


Edit:
FAA May 5, 2019

Are you suggesting a laser was used to shoot down the Russian jet?
 
Are you suggesting a laser was used to shoot down the Russian jet?
No, no, not by any means. It was just kind of interting that it appeared on the 5th. The FAA have always been gate keepers, imho.
 

Lightning knocked out autopilot of SSJ-100 that exploded at Sheremetyevo, says watchdog

The findings indicate that the pilots tried several times to establish communications with the air traffic controller at an operational frequency but managed to do this only at an emergency frequency

The SSJ-100 airliner that burst into flames upon its emergency landing at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport on May 5 had lost communications with air-traffic controllers for some time after it was struck by lightning. The plane’s autopilot also went out of order, according to a preliminary report published by the Inter-State Aviation Committee on Friday.

"After the lightning had struck the plane, the autopilot went out of order, setting off the sound warning system," the document says.

Also, the pilots tried several times to establish communications with the air traffic controller at an operational frequency but managed to do this only at an emergency frequency, the findings indicate.

After the lightning struck the plane, the onboard flight recorders operated improperly for about 15 seconds, the document says.

"Beginning from 15:08:12, one-off commands and indicators of analogue parameters that are recorded through EIU-100 data concentrator units were improperly recorded for about 15 seconds," the findings say.

A Sukhoi Superjet-100 belonging to Aeroflot airlines, which took off from Moscow’s Sheremetyevo for Murmansk on May 5, had to return to the airport about 30 minutes after its flight, making an emergency landing and subsequently bursting into flames. There were 73 passengers and five crewmembers aboard the plane. In all, 41 people died in the air crash, and 10 others were hospitalized.

Investigators have opened a criminal case over flight safety violations and breaches in aircraft operation that entailed the death of two and more people through negligence. Detectives are looking into several versions of the incident, including pilot incompetence, a technical failure and unfavorable weather conditions.
 
The day after the Sukhoi Superjet 100 incident at Moscow.

[REAL ATC] Aeroflot Sukhoi SUFFERS A DECOMPRESSION enroute | Returns to Riga
Published on May 6, 2019 / 10:01
ce16543812fc7312aa9390fc983005c0.png
 
MOSCOW, October 2. /TASS/. Russia’s Investigative Committee has brought criminal charges against air pilot Denis Yevdokimov, whose Sukhoi Superjet-100 liner crash-landed at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport in May.

"The investigation continues. Charges have been brought against Denis Yevdokimov. Aeroflot provides all-round assistance to the investigators," the air carrier said. Aeroflot stated that "only following all-round and thorough examination of all evidence it will be possible to establish the real causes of the disaster and take the necessary measures in order to avoid such tragic situations in the future."

Once again Aeroflot asked the media, the public and officials to refrain from spreading premature conclusions about the causes of the crash before the official investigation is over.

A source familiar with the case has said Yevdokimov’s defense has requested extra examination of the landing gear’s design and the flammability of materials of the plane’s interior. "Also, the plane’s electric control systems will be tested," he added.

Aeroflot’s Sukhoi Superjet liner (SSJ-100), which left Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport for Murmansk on May 5 had to return about 30 minutes later. It made a crash landing and caught fire. There were 73 passengers and five crew on board; 41 died and 10 others were injured.

A criminal case was opened over the air crash under Part 3 of Article 263 of the Criminal Code (violation of air traffic and aircraft operation safety rules that caused negligent death of two or more persons). Maximum punishment under this article is seven years in prison.
 
Back
Top Bottom