Sexing Up The kids

Barry

Padawan Learner
Article today on reuters.

"Sexy media a siren call to promiscuity: study
By Michael Conlon

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Sexually charged music, magazines, TV and movies push youngsters into intercourse at an earlier age, perhaps by acting as kind of virtual peer that tells them everyone else is doing it, a study said on Monday.

"This is the first time we've shown that the more kids are exposed to sex in media the earlier they have sex," said Jane Brown of the University of North Carolina, chief author of the report.

Previous research had been limited to television, said the study which looked at 1,017 adolescents when they were aged 12 to 14 and again two years later. They were checked on their exposure during the two years to 264 items -- movies, TV shows, music and magazines -- which were analyzed for their sexual content.

In general it found that the highest exposure levels led to more sexual activity, with white teens in the group 2.2 times more likely to have had intercourse at ages 14 to 16 than similar youngsters who had the least exposure.

The effect was not as pronounced for blacks, the study said, perhaps because the black youngsters in the study were already more sexually experienced than the whites were when the research began and thus were less influenced by media exposure over the two-year period.

The teenage pregnancy rate in the United States is three to 10 times higher than that found in other industrialized nations, making that and exposure to sexually transmitted infections a major public health concern, the study said.

At the same time parents tend not to talk about sex with their children in a timely and comprehensive way, leaving a vacuum in which the media may become a powerful sex educator, providing "frequent and compelling portraits of sex as fun and risk free."

"Interestingly one of the strongest predictors of risk for early sexual intercourse for both black and white teens (in the study) was the perception that his or her peers were having sex," the report said.

Youngsters "may begin to believe the world view portrayed and may begin to adopt the media's social norms as their own. Some, especially those who have fewer alternative sources of sexual norms, such as parents or friends, may use the media as a kind of sexual superpeer that encourages them to be sexually active," the report added.

The study was published in the April issue of "Pediatrics," the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A portion of the data was previously published in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

The study was done in several schools in North Carolina. The authors said that they did not measure the impact of exposure to sexual material on the Internet because when the research began in 2001 relatively few of the early adolescents in the sample had Internet access Additional research should include exposure to Web-based material, the study suggested.

"It took many studies over a number of years to establish that violence in the media increased children's violent behavior and to begin initiatives to reduce harmful effects," the study said.

"Given the consistent findings regarding media violence, it may be prudent not to wait decades to conclude that the media are also important sources of sexual norms for youth," it added. "

Well, fancy that! I especially like the comment:

[Snip]The effect was not as pronounced for blacks, the study said, perhaps because the black youngsters in the study were already more sexually experienced than the whites were when the research began and thus were less influenced by media exposure over the two-year period.[Snip]


Sounds like something Babs Bush would say!
 
Barry said:
Article today on reuters.



The teenage pregnancy rate in the United States is three to 10 times higher than that found in other industrialized nations, making that and exposure to sexually transmitted infections a major public health concern, the study said.
Have you ever been to Colchester, or stevenage? :lol:

statistics could tell you the world is flat.,would you believe that?
 
So what are you saying, that I cant present an article on the forum because it may contain incorrect data? That if I present something that is incorrect (in your eyes), then I am totally incapable of discernment and merely a gullible fool?

What are the pregnancy rates of Colchester & Stevenage? Are they higher than the entire USA?

I dont appreciate comments that try to belittle people...
 
Barry said:
I dont appreciate comments that try to belittle people...
Perhaps borderfox's comment was not directed at you, but rather to anyone reading the article, as a warning? Besides, I think the article is what was being belittled, not you. Just cuz you posted the article does not mean you have to defend it. You put a bunch of words into someone else's mouth as well. It seems your self-importance took a hit. Settle down there Barry.
 
The point is sex is blasted all over TV, Parents don't talk to their kids about it (mine didn't, well at least not very well) and kids are having sex younger and younger.

I don't need statistics to tell me what i can see with my eyes, although i do appreciate barry's original post.
 
You put a bunch of words into someone else's mouth as well. It seems your self-importance took a hit. Settle down there Barry.
Yeah, I think you are right Beau. Had a stressful day yesterday and I took it out on Borderfox. I had actually posted something entirely different in response initially but changed it a few mins later after "processing" borderfox's comments. Strange how the ego works...

Thanks for the perspective. Apologies Borderfox.
 
Back
Top Bottom