It's an odd title I recognize, but since English is not my native language and I use an online translator it can be confusing, but I want to ask the question.
I'll start here: I have not been involved in reading romance fiction as well as the books in the other related thread. I have kept track of both threads and understand the intent of the reading work to deal with the emotional center.
However, things have taken me in another direction, although it also involves the emotional center, to some degree. In the last year I have had strong feelings and emotions about relationships, and the negative and positive aspects. Somehow that led me to come across real life accounts of men scorned because their partner cheated on them with another and vice versa. One thing led to another and I ended up reading and watching videos of these stories and the reflections of their commentators. Many of these are the ones that belong to this type of reality called manosphere / red pill community.
Beyond the criticism of feminism and other topics of this sphere, what caught my attention is the topic of infidelity, female promiscuity and how men in general by experience are avoiding women who have had a questionable lifestyle to the point of no longer wanting to marry, and resulting as the basic nucleus of society, the family is not formed. (Well, we already know that the family is in crisis for many years part of the social engineering to which humanity in general is being subjected). But what I want to point out is something that has made me not only ring the bell, but also to think if there is any relation.
From several commentators on youtube, either the channel's amphrition or the comments, several of them have pointed out the following:
"From the looks of it, when a woman is promiscuous, her receptors for joining a man in a long-term, stable relationship are damaged."
This simply made my mind explode when the phrase immediately made me think of recivership capability, the information field and proteins.
So these are my questions:
¿Does promiscuous activity, which we know is also part of a misuse of sexual energy, have a bearing on damaging (DNA) or limiting recivership capability and impeding soul growth?
¿Could this be one of the many ploys of the PTB to enslave mankind by preventing a true union between man and woman?
Somehow it seems to me that there is a relationship also with the exercise of reading romantic fiction, because not only does it cleanse the emotional center, but the exercise also makes those stories reflect lasting and stable unions of true commitment between the parties. In that sense romantic fiction has a restorative effect on the receivers and broadens the range of the recivership capability.
I'll start here: I have not been involved in reading romance fiction as well as the books in the other related thread. I have kept track of both threads and understand the intent of the reading work to deal with the emotional center.
However, things have taken me in another direction, although it also involves the emotional center, to some degree. In the last year I have had strong feelings and emotions about relationships, and the negative and positive aspects. Somehow that led me to come across real life accounts of men scorned because their partner cheated on them with another and vice versa. One thing led to another and I ended up reading and watching videos of these stories and the reflections of their commentators. Many of these are the ones that belong to this type of reality called manosphere / red pill community.
Beyond the criticism of feminism and other topics of this sphere, what caught my attention is the topic of infidelity, female promiscuity and how men in general by experience are avoiding women who have had a questionable lifestyle to the point of no longer wanting to marry, and resulting as the basic nucleus of society, the family is not formed. (Well, we already know that the family is in crisis for many years part of the social engineering to which humanity in general is being subjected). But what I want to point out is something that has made me not only ring the bell, but also to think if there is any relation.
From several commentators on youtube, either the channel's amphrition or the comments, several of them have pointed out the following:
"From the looks of it, when a woman is promiscuous, her receptors for joining a man in a long-term, stable relationship are damaged."
This simply made my mind explode when the phrase immediately made me think of recivership capability, the information field and proteins.
So these are my questions:
¿Does promiscuous activity, which we know is also part of a misuse of sexual energy, have a bearing on damaging (DNA) or limiting recivership capability and impeding soul growth?
¿Could this be one of the many ploys of the PTB to enslave mankind by preventing a true union between man and woman?
Somehow it seems to me that there is a relationship also with the exercise of reading romantic fiction, because not only does it cleanse the emotional center, but the exercise also makes those stories reflect lasting and stable unions of true commitment between the parties. In that sense romantic fiction has a restorative effect on the receivers and broadens the range of the recivership capability.