No, your tone had been perceived by me as aggressive. Same as this reply of yours.
So it was "perceived by you as aggressive", but that's just your perception, which is unlikely to always be accurate. So can you point to anything in what I wrote that can be said to be objectively aggressive. For reference, I responded to another member who suggested that those who don't like posts from this person should simply not read them by saying:
Even more simple, don't post "noise" posts from this source.
What is objectively aggressive in the above and to whom is the "aggression" directed (if anyone)? Keep in mind that a disagreement between members had been ongoing for a while, with some suggesting that there is no value in posts from this "psychic" person. Icarus Rising suggested that, to solve this disagreement, those who think there is no value in the posts, should simply not read them. My response was to suggest that, IMO, an even better way to solve this disagreement was for members to not post "noise" posts/information from this "psychic" person.
So that, precisely, is what you are calling "aggressive".