Well damned. I may have to revert to scientific method over numerology, though I will show the insight for such thought as Jan 27, 2007. Since I cannot get reliable dates more than about 500 years ago, I will look at 49^2 (or 7^4 cycles).
From the installation of first obelisk in Rome (which has 13 obelisks erected) and which Washington, DC, some Masons took great trouble to build a huge obelisk (taller than any allowed building which is limited to 13 stories), and which Egyptians had scads of obelisks from whom the oppressed followed Moses out in Exodus, we see the seat of Catholicism has these same Obelisks as what they escaped from as well as the name Rome from whom they were persecuted.
Anyway, there are two events regarding the first obelisk in Rome. (You know, upon threat of death no one is to speak upon the lifting of this obelisk into place upon threat from the pope). There is the date of lifting (in which it was covered) and then the date of unveiling... about 6 months apart.
So, looking at first date scientifically, cyclically, we can measure major monetary events within some multiple of 49^2 days. We have on Jan 27, 2007, 49^2 x 8^2 days (a squared number of days). Going back to the previous square utilizing 49^2 of that date, we find 49^2 x 7^2 or 64 - 49 = 15 cycles back, taking us to 1908, the date of the Monetary commission which was to establish the Federal Reserve 5 years after.
Well, anyway it isn't exact but is within a very small fraction of 1% of exact. Also, if you do research, you will find such significant events of other nations, England, France, etc within one small fraction of 1% of exact to this event.
So if the numerology does not work out exact, the science shows close. They may set up little traps, being far too clever... But we are within a small fraction of 1% of very close.
