Hi ToeKnee with sleepyvinny and Ark mentioned:
ToeKnee >> Although the video on the website is very compelling and does raise a lot of questions; none of those questions can be answered properly without the release of more evidence.
I have just read the entire thread and find it hard to believe we are debating the topic of “the video on the website” without introducing the readers to a video link in the Opening Post. Right away you are asking these readers to literally ‘read your mind’ and determine the “New Pentagon Video” is a reference to this Alex Jones article ( _http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/pentagon_plane_release.htm ) about the
“May 16, 2006 Judicial Watch” released Pentagon Camera #1 and Camera #2 Security Video images:
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/dodvideos.html
Sleepyvinny makes the ‘security tapes’ comment in Post #5, but says,
“This is verifiable: just try to get hold of the information, the extra security tapes etc, and you will find that you cannot.” Since the extra security tape video information was released in May of 2006 and Sleepyvinny’s post was made on June 25, 2006, then obviously the extra security tape information was available; unless of course I am missing something in the translation. The discussion on this thread appears to meander left, right, up and down all around the
“Pentagon Strike Video: Information” without ever addressing the topic at all. The OP thesis statement says:
ToeKnee >> Although the video on the website is very compelling and does raise a lot of questions; none of those questions can be answered properly without the release of more evidence.
What video and what website? If the video information on the website is very compelling, then obviously some 911Truth explanation can be gathered from careful analysis of the released data. The Topic Starter appears to be using the released security camera information to make a case for what cannot be answered rather than using this opportunity to present evidence so these readers can draw well-informed
“What Really Happened At The Pentagon” conclusions. The fact is that we ‘can’ extrapolate vital dimensional data from the released security frames to establish the diameter of the flying object within a very small margin of error, which the DoD failed to realize upon finally releasing this very important evidence. We can examine the Three-Part Dimensional Extrapolation Procedure in a moment, after we look at the Topic Starter’s intentions more carefully.
ToeKnee >> Did a 757 hit the Pentagon? Did a smaller plane hit it? Did a missile hit it? Who Knows! No one can answer those questions as long as the FBI does not disclose further evidence, which they deliberately withholding.
The common denominator in all my Pentagon Thesis Papers is they contain no question marks, because asking OP questions requires answers and your reading audience is divided into smaller factions with the asking of each question. This particular OP was drafted to raise more questions than the author is willing or able to answer, as evidenced by his reluctance to include even one link to any third-party information at all. Rather than post the Security Video Information link I posted above, ToeKnee sends you to this 9-11 Anomalies ( http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/anomalies.html ) in Post #4 with no information on the
“Pentagon Strike Video: Information” at all. ToeKnee then links you to Jim Hoffman’s “Flight 77 Hit The Pentagon” Disinformation here ( http://www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/index.html ) in Post #7 in a vain attempt to hijack his own topic to
“OfficialCoverStoryVille.” Ark hit the nail squarely on the head in Post # 6:
Ark >> "We should concentrate on ALL OTHER EVIDENCE"? Who are "we"? You mean "us", or you mean "you"? Why should some people not be dealing with the Pentagon issue? You do not like this idea? I wonder why? And why did you originally call this new thread that you have posted "Pentagon Strike: Disinformation?"
The fact is that ToeKnee is doing everything to lead these Admins, Mods, registered members and readers ‘away’ from the DoD incriminating evidence actually found in the released Security images, because the inside job bad guys now realize 911Truthers have more evidence that the Pentagon was attacked by the Department Of Defense itself. If we can dispense with the formalities of examining the Topic Starter’s true intentions, then maybe we can actually discover the 911Truth contained in the security images themselves. Rather than assume everyone here is familiar with the Pentagon Security Frame information, please allow me to start at the beginning:
Five Pentagon frames ( http://www.911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/uncropped.html ) were leaked to the public in March of 2002 ( http://www.911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/fiveframes.html ) that started all the controversy, until Camera #1 and Camera #2 video JudicialWatch.org clips were released on May 16, 2006 as described above. These images were taken through a ‘wide-angle lens’ and the flying object is just over seven hundred feet away from the security camera, so establishing the precise diameter of the flying object appears an impossibility. Right? Wrong. :0) The DoD’s blunder in allowing the original five frames to be leaked is coming back to haunt them, which requires DoD Disinformation Operatives to carry out this kind of diversionary deflection smokescreen trickery. The fact is that a three-part Geometric, Observational and Algebraic Dimensional Extrapolation Procedure does exist that will give us the actual diameter of the flying object (missile) within a two inch margin of error. The procedure begins by careful examination of the famous Frame1 image:
Source >> http://www.911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/dodvideos.html
Many 911Truthers are confused about what actually appears and is hidden in this famous Frame1 image showing the vapor trail exhaust with the missile hidden behind the right-hand column. You can see the actual missile nose section included in the blackboard taken from the top right-hand frame and Camera #2 on the “Source” page. The three-part dimensional extrapolation procedure begins by establishing the 911Truth surrounding all wide-angle lens images. Every wide-angle lens distorts the sizes of all contained images in direct proportion to their distance away from the ‘true’ horizontal X-Axis plane and the vertical Y-Axis plane dividing the frame into four equal parts like a surveyor’s
‘transit level’ ( http://www.bobvila.com/HowTo_Library/The_Transit_Level--A2060.html )
‘crosshair’ ( http://www.themcdonalds.net/richard/astro/writings/images/castleFarCrosshair.jpg ). A true Horizontal X-Axis plane is running all the way across the frame1 image with a true Y-Axis plane running vertically establishing a ‘true’ X-Y Axis Intersection Point directly in the center of the picture. I have established an ‘imaginary’ X and Y-Axis plane coinciding with the upper right-hand corner of the right-hand column to locate the new X-Y Axis Intersection Point labeled
“The Magic Spot :0)” in the blow up image.
The security camera we are looking through AND the top of that right-hand column AND a reference point 5 feet above the horizon all lay along the same 5-feet Horizontal X-Axis plane through which we draw a single line segment ( http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/5footplane.jpg ). We cannot see the missile behind the column, but we can see the missile ‘exhaust’ centered on the same 5-feet X-Axis plane telling us the ‘missile nose’ is also on the same plane. Our only dimension taken from this Geometric portion of the exercise is the 5-feet measurement from the missile nose down to the ground established by the line segment running horizontal between the video camera itself, the top of the right-hand column, the missile nose and the 5-feet reference point just above the horizon in the distance some 1800 feet away. We then leave the Geometric portion of the procedure to enter the Observational segment of the exercise to determine the ‘ratio’ between the missile diameter and the ‘clearance underneath.’
This is the Camera #2 image showing the missile nose section entering the frame from the Source right-hand first image. The dark shadowy looking object below the missile nose is as section of sidewalk located between our security camera and the missile appearing in the distance. From this picture we can determine the ‘ratio’ of the clearance underneath is between twice and three times the missile diameter, which gives us a proportion of 1X to 2.5X for the final Algebraic third of the dimensional extrapolation procedure. Returning to the original Frame1 picture with my blackboard illustration, we see the equation gathered from this three-part exercise:
While we do not know the distance from the ‘top’ of the flying object to the ground, we have 5 feet from the ground to the missile nose. Since one half of the missile diameter dimension is above ‘and’ below the missile nose, we use ½X in the equation to represent the ‘bottom’ half of the flying object. We then add two and a half times the diameter to ½X that combined equal our 5-feet dimension to begin solving the equation.
.5X + 2.5X = 5’
X + 5X = 10’ (double values to eliminate the ½X)
6X = 10’
X = 1.66667’
X = 20 inches
The Frame1 Pentagon Security Frame image says an object flying just 5 feet off the ground with 2.5 times the clearance underneath is right at 20 inches in diameter, which is obviously NOT an image of any 100-Ton Jetliner or any ‘manned aircraft’ at all. The only flying object that can strike the Pentagon to go “BOOM” with a 20-inch diameter is one kind of missile or another. The time stamp data has been overwritten to show a 9/12 date and a later time, because the DoD does not want you to realize these images were taken at 9:31:39 AM when the Pentagon Clocks were stopped ( http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/312.jpg ) and their fake Flight Data Recorder information ( http://web.archive.org/web/20061007032310/http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Flight_+Path_+Study_AA77.pdf ) places their Phantom Flight 77 Jetliner ‘beyond’ Pentagon airspace. This 9:31:39 AM Missile Strike was caught on the Double Tree Security Video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wUXXgfN2fM ) with the 9:32:43 time stamp ( http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/0932AMExplosion.jpg ) confirming the FAA 9:32 AM aircraft crash explosion included in the
Official “Chronology Of A Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001” ( http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB165/faa5.pdf ) Timeline. This combined 9:32 AM First Explosion Evidence (more here >> http://blog.lege.net/content/Seven_Hours_in_September.pdf ) establishes the 911Truth that the original attack on the Pentagon had NOTHING to do with Flight 77 or any 100-Ton Jetliner at all and that the Official Bush Administration/DoD Cover Story is nothing more than a Cover Story LIE. Disproving the Official “Flight 77” Cover Story is made simple by looking at the pre-collapse images:
This is the exact location where the Official Cover Story Cronies say a real 100-Ton Jetliner crashed going 530 miles per hour. :0) A man could literally stand atop one of those cable spools and reach his hands up to the elevation of the ‘still-standing’ second-story concrete slab, but the DoD says this picture includes a crashed 100-Ton Jetliner. To say we need ‘more evidence’ to disprove the Official Cover Story is BULLONY and most everyone here knows that already. The released Pentagon Security evidence is just one nail of many in the Official Cover Story coffin that We The People with Congressional Oversight should have laid to rest LONG AGO, except for the serious lack of leadership allowing this Bushie Administration/DoD/FBI Charade to continue unabated right before our eyes everyday showing the real inside job guys getting away with bloody murder of innocent US Citizens.
GL,
Terral
