stevenwarran said:
Ottershrew said, "As you may already have gathered, the background to this forum lies in channeled communications."
I said, "I hadn't caught on that, at base, SOTT was about channeled communications, and that explains a lot."
Joe the Administrator said, "SOTT is not at base about channeled communications," without further elaboration.
What further elaboration was necessary? Joe was being honest. Ottershrew was sharing his/her understanding which is simply not complete. Some of the associated web pages of this forum deal with 'channeled communications' but SOTT, by definition, does not. I really don't see the reason for your continued aggression.
sw said:
So it is rude of me to on the surface say an obviously vexing and provocative thing like, "Got it?" Unadorned. Unshielded.
Actually, yes, it is rude.
sw said:
Yet Joe, the "Administrator," can tell me where I am wrong, with nary a concern for constructively righting my misinformation, and that is seen as sophisticated sophistry and not rudeness. This coming after his light chiding I was likely to find my beliefs will be found insane here.
Actually, Joe was being extremely polite in his response, considering your provocation and aggression. If you were familiar at all with this forum, then you would realize that anyone advocating the 'no plane' theory here would have their sanity challenged - and - hmmm - didn't you previously say that you didn't advocate this theory - so how, then, are these your 'beliefs'?
ws said:
Is all this because of my imprecision with language? "At base," for "background." "My area of 9-11 advocacy," instead of "My area of 9-11 core competency?"
Perhaps. So, are you now saying that you do advocate the 'no plane' theory, but it's not your 'core competency'? Does it depend on what the meaning of 'is' is?
sw said:
And who are all you other people? I was talking to Ottershrew and Joe. Is it fun to "lay on?"
'lay on'? In case you were unaware, this is a forum, not a personal telephone conversation. When anyone posting on this forum makes aggressive and offensive comments to another person on this forum, it is noticed, and quickly - because we do not tolerate such behavior here.
sw said:
Maybe I was having a bad day.
Perhaps, but why should this forum 'pay' for your bad day by being the recipients of your verbal abuse? Judging from this last response, it seems a rather long day for you.
sw said:
And maybe I don't know how to get off on the right foot.
Perhaps, but that is not this forum's responsibility.
sw said:
Maybe I have a spanking fetish and Joe is an authority trigger.
Perhaps, but there are other forums for engaging in such behavior - let me guess - you think that was funny, right?
sw said:
And what the hell does "baking" mean?
Hmmm - I believe it means 'cooking' with heat.
sw said:
I can hear your voices talking behind these words. Can you hear me? RI "came to me," is translated as either "I don't go trolling," or "I have been working in painful isolation. I don't reach out to while away the hours"
What do you mean you can 'hear your voices' - is that literal? It also seems that 'came to me' means - by your definition - visited your website? Please correct me if I'm wrong - but if so, that's a rather interesting definition, especially when used as a defense against pushing your own agenda on another site. Perhaps you should put up a disclaimer on your web site stating that any visitor has 'come to you' thus you are free to return the favor and interact any way you see fit? It might cut down on confusion.
The painful isolation aspect is rather well understood, however - most truth seekers do find themselves at that point sooner or later, until they learn to network effectively.
sw said:
I can tell you I believe whole-heartedly in every word I've ever written, especially the mistakes. and if that reads as "agenda pushing," or "abusive language," or "an inability to discuss and share in a manner befitting normal human beings,"
Apologies, but are you saying that you do not consider the language you used to be abusive? Are you also stating that you believe - especially - the mistakes you have written?
sw said:
to you, then I guess somewhere along the line I'll figure out what the spending the last half-hour of my life was worth. But not here. And not now.
I'm a bit confused by this last part - are you stating that this is the 'last half hour of your life' - as in you are going to commit suicide? Perhaps I am misunderstanding you, and I hope that I am, because committing suicide over getting banned by a website is indicative of much deeper problems and much deeper pain than we are able to deal with here. If this is the case, all I can suggest is that you hold on until tomorrow - just one more night. See how things seem tomorrow and look into getting some support - no one can do this alone.
If this was another sarcastic joke of yours, then it's still not a bad idea to get some support.