The "Mandela Effect"- Has my Bible changed? Or do I just have a bad memory like most people?

Why limit the possibilities in regard to reality bridging? I guess the "current" timeline may be the result of multiple possible changes and each individual limited by the his own awareness level may experience it differently / contextually.

did a search on deja vu on cassioapaeatranscripts.org and the session on January 4th 1997 may be relevant
Source: Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
A: Deja vu comes to you compliments of 4th density STS.

Q: (L) Is deja vu a result of some sensation of the universe having changed?

A: Or... some sensation of reality bridging.

Q: (T) As you move into the new one, you have leftovers?

A: No.

Q: (L) What is reality bridging?

A: What does it sound like?

Q: (L) Is it somewhat like merging universes? (T) A bridge is something you put between two things...

A: You wish to limit, wait till 4th density, when the word will be obsolete!

Q: (L) That still doesn't help me to understand deja vu as a "sensation of reality bridging." Is deja vu because something comes into our reality from another?

A: One possibility..

Q: (T) Didn't we talk about this? That it is a bleedthrough from other dimensions... that when we think we have been someplace before, it is because in another dimension we have...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) If you are now in a particular universe that has been created and merged by 4th density STS, and there is still the old universe existing, and you feel a connection, or a bridging, because some alternate self is in that alternate universe, living through some experience... or a similar thing?

A: No limits of possibilities.

Q: (L) So it can be any and all of those things, and bridging realities of "past" and "future," as well. Is it possible to change the past within a discrete universe, or does every change imply a new or alternate universe?

A: Discrete does not get it.

Q: (L) Well, within a particular, selected one of the universes, can you go back in time, within that universe, change the past, and have it change everything forward, still within that selected universe, like a domino effect?

A: In such a case, yes.

Q: (L) But, you said that if you want to change the past, you have to create an alternate universe... (T) No, you asked about changing the past, and they said you have to create a temporary place to work from, a position from which you can manipulate the reality...

A: That is for specialized activities.

Q: (L) So that creating of an alternate universe was for special things, and not for a general historic change?

A: What was described is not the same as an "alternate universe."

Q: (L) It is a temporary file that will go away when you are finished loading the program. And that is not creating an alternate universe, but rather a temporary dimension...

A: Close.
Click to expand...
 
"Q: (L) Well, within a particular, selected one of the universes, can you go back in time, within that universe, change the past, and have it change everything forward, still within that selected universe, like a domino effect?

A: In such a case, yes."

This reminds me of a quote from William James where I think he was talking about multiple existences and how they can emerge and be accessed in special states of consciousness. Possibly the Wave may enhance this?

William James in his book 'The Varieties of Religious Experience':

The whole drift of my education goes to persuade me that the world of our present consciousness is only one out of many worlds of consciousness that exist, and that those other worlds must contain experiences which have a meaning for our life also; and that although in the main their experiences and those of this world keep discrete, yet the two become continuous at certain points, and higher energies filter in."
Click to expand...
 
kenlee said:
"Q: (L) Well, within a particular, selected one of the universes, can you go back in time, within that universe, change the past, and have it change everything forward, still within that selected universe, like a domino effect?

A: In such a case, yes."
Click to expand...

Very interesting. My interpretation is that if you alter the past you will inevitably create an alternate timeline that will carry on independently from the original one, with a new set of conditions that will overwrite any possible paradoxes. But according to the C’s answer here, this new timeline would normally be inserted within the same universe that contained the original timeline, and not in some alternate universe. This would imply that the present universe contains many independent timelines, and the question would rather be, what is it that keeps us generally focused on one particular timeline throughout our present incarnation? I would speculate that one has a natural tendency to be drawn towards a “default timeline” because that timeline functions as a consensus reality by virtue of having been coalesced from the sum-total of all similar expectations and beliefs held by the majority of conscious beings; it’s the reality on which the most emotional currency has been invested.

This all boils down to the basic tenet that your beliefs create your reality, and that if you can manage to accept that you are only currently operating from a set of deeply ingrained beliefs basically because you made up your mind to play in the present sandbox, so you have to abide by the agreed upon rules. Then it also follows that at some point you can decide that the currently accepted beliefs have served their purpose and that you are ready to play in a different sandbox.
 
Luftalchimist said:
This would imply that the present universe contains many independent timelines, and the question would rather be, what is it that keeps us generally focused on one particular timeline throughout our present incarnation? I would speculate that one has a natural tendency to be drawn towards a “default timeline” because that timeline functions as a consensus reality by virtue of having been coalesced from the sum-total of all similar expectations and beliefs held by the majority of conscious beings; it’s the reality on which the most emotional currency has been invested.
Click to expand...

Sounds good!
 
Off topic - If anyone took an interest in the video I posted with Clif High and Dick A;guire about a coming event, here is a video of the six remote viewers discussing what to do with the information they received. Hopefully, someone will ask the Cs about this topic.

 
I am reading this now:
Spur said:
OK, here is a fascinating website that deals with time line shifts. Here is a page devoted to the 'Mandela Effect'. The rest of the webpage is even more fascinating.

Mandela Effect – A System of Soul Management – Metallicman

metallicman.com metallicman.com
Click to expand...
And I found this quote:

Looney Toons​

The children’s cartoon, the “Looney Toons” was loved by many. I myself would be glued to the television set all during my childhood. I would watch Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd, and the host of other characters entertain me.

The name, “Looney Toons” makes sense because “toons” is the ending of cartoons. The show is actually called “Looney Tunes.” Seriously. It’s not even a musical show!
Click to expand...
So I remembered it like "toones" but now there is poped up a memory:
A friend of mine introduced me tho millencolin who had a song called "tiny toons" to "the same old tunes" because of copyright infringement with the tiny toons form Warner bros. (Same Old Tunes - Wikipedia.)
So why would WB call them tiny toons if the original is called loony tunes and why can millencolin use tunes if the loony tu(u)(oo)n(e)s use it too, that would be either an infringement...
This incident raises my curiosity - Is ist possible to pinpoint the original truth by searching it through a backdoor (via detours)?
Or am I only confused by that and this example can not proove anything?
 
Luftalchimist said:
Very interesting. My interpretation is that if you alter the past you will inevitably create an alternate timeline that will carry on independently from the original one, with a new set of conditions that will overwrite any possible paradoxes. But according to the C’s answer here, this new timeline would normally be inserted within the same universe that contained the original timeline, and not in some alternate universe. This would imply that the present universe contains many independent timelines, and the question would rather be, what is it that keeps us generally focused on one particular timeline throughout our present incarnation? I would speculate that one has a natural tendency to be drawn towards a “default timeline” because that timeline functions as a consensus reality by virtue of having been coalesced from the sum-total of all similar expectations and beliefs held by the majority of conscious beings; it’s the reality on which the most emotional currency has been invested.

This all boils down to the basic tenet that your beliefs create your reality, and that if you can manage to accept that you are only currently operating from a set of deeply ingrained beliefs basically because you made up your mind to play in the present sandbox, so you have to abide by the agreed upon rules. Then it also follows that at some point you can decide that the currently accepted beliefs have served their purpose and that you are ready to play in a different sandbox.
Click to expand...

1700584457134.png
 

Attachments

  • 2003829-Albert-Einstein-Quote-Reality-is-merely-an-illusion-albeit-a-very.webp
    17.9 KB · Views: 6
Here's a video I came upon that has an individual that purports to be a channel for an ET life-form. In it there is an explanation of what the 'Mandela Effect' is and there is some light hearted discussion of some of what people notice in the time-line shifts.

 
OK, this is even weirder/freakier than I could imagine. A bloke takes a older phone and uses it to 'look back through time' at various Mandela Effects. Crikey, just when I think I'm getting a handle on this phenomena something like this pops up.

 
That's obviously a fake. Someone in the comments also posted proof of it that you can see in the video:

Well it IS edited. And very well so. I even have the 100% proof right there: Go to 1:57 (adjust video speed to 0.25 if necessary) and press pause at the exact right moment and you see the monocle disappear from the phone screen.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom