Landmark Genetic Study reveals ancestry of those living around Rome in the Imperial period almost identical to Anatolians

Michael B-C

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Three major genetic studies exploring the migration ancestry of the southern arc countries (Western Asia and Southern Europe) have been simultaneously published in journal Science. Covering the period from the PPN to Medieval Europe, all three reveal results laden with implication but in particular for those studying the imperial history of Rome, are the results of paper 3 which also covers The Bronze Age Aegean world, The era of Greek colonization, The Urartian Kingdom and its neighbors in Iran and Mesopotamia, and Medieval migrations into Anatolia and the Balkans.

First, some study context:

The Southern Arc and its lively genetic History

25.08.2022

A large-scale paleogenetic study of ancient populations from cultures and civilizations from western Asia and Southern Europe from the early Copper Age until the late middle ages reveals insights on migration patterns, genetics and interactions between the earliest farmer groups, and the origins and spread of Indo-European languages.

The Southern Arc – a bridge between Europe and Asia

Some of the earliest civilizations emerged and flourished in the ‘Southern Arc,’ a geographic region that stretches from the Caucasus and the Levant, across Anatolia and the Aegean into the Balkans; forming a bridge between Europe and Asia.

Across this arc various ancient human cultures formed, and spread. These cultures, whether lost to history or surviving down to the present day, are not only the heritage of the people of the region, but made a profound impact on human civilization as a whole.

At present, our knowledge about the people of many of these cultures, their movements, mating patterns and languages, is patchy. Paleogenetic research can cast new light on the lifeways of the people of past societies and the spread and diversification of their languages. However, addressing big questions about the past with paleogenetics requires large-scale systematic research which fills many of the current geographic and temporal gaps with which we can piece the puzzle.

In a trio of papers published simultaneously in the journal Science which report genome-wide data from 727 distinct ancient individuals—more than doubling the amount of ancient DNA data from this region and filling in major gaps in the paleogenetic record—a team of researchers led by Ron Pinhasi at the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology and Human Evolution and Archaeological Sciences (HEAS) at the University of Vienna, Songül Alpaslan-Roodenberg at the University of Vienna and Harvard University, and Iosif Lazaridis and David Reich at Harvard University—together with 202 co-authors—leverage their data to test longstanding archaeological, genetic and linguistic hypotheses. They present a systematic picture of the interlinked histories of peoples across this region from the origins of agriculture, to late medieval times.

So on to an overview of chronologically paper 3:

The Historic Period

This paper - “A genetic probe into the ancient and medieval history of Southern Europe and West Asia”- reveals how polities of the ancient Mediterranean world preserved contrasts of ancestry since the Bronze Age but were linked by migration.

The analyses support the theory that the ancient “Mycenaeans” of Greece can be modelled as a mixture in an approximately 1:10 ratio of a Yamnaya-like steppe-derived population and a “Minoan”/Early Bronze Age-like Aegean population, on average, but with previously unknown variation clarifying social aspects of the blending process:

“The Mycenaean gene pool was not monolithic,” says Iosif Lazaridis. Steppe ancestry was common, at low levels, in both elite and non-elite individuals. Some elite men traced their paternal descent to steppe populations, but others, like the Griffin Warrior near ancient Pylos from whom we recovered DNA, did not have any steppe ancestry at all. “We have to imagine steppe migrants as a population element that became integrated, both socially and genetically, into Aegean societies, and not as a people apart that dominated them.”

The results also show that the ancestry of people who lived around Rome in the Imperial period was almost identical to that of Roman/Byzantine individuals from Anatolia in both their mean and pattern of variation, while Italians prior to the Imperial period had a very different distribution. This suggests that the Roman Empire in both its shorter-lived western part and the longer-lasting eastern part centered on Anatolia had a diverse but similar population plausibly drawn to a substantial extent from Anatolian pre-Imperial sources.

“We knew from our previous research that people who lived around Rome in the Imperial period were from various regions and that many originated from the Near East,” says Ron Pinhasi who co-led a 2019 Science study that studied ancient DNA data from Rome. “But it was a complete surprise to find such a specific and clear link to Anatolia itself, and not to other eastern parts of the Roman Empire such as the Levant.”

The full paper 3 is attached below in PDF form.
 

Attachments

  • 4.9. PAPER 3 - A genetic probe into the ancient and medieval history of Southern Europe and We...pdf
    2.6 MB · Views: 7
For anyone interested in the earlier data covered in papers 1 and 2, they are now attached as PDF's below:

1. DNA from Mesopotamia suggests distinct PPN & Pottery Neolithic migrations into Anatolia

2. Genetic history of the Southern Arc - A bridge between West Asia and Europe 3,000 BC
 

Attachments

  • 4.7. PAPER 1 - DNA from Mesopotamia suggests distinct PPN & Pottery Neolithic migrations into ...pdf
    1,009.7 KB · Views: 6
  • 4.8. PAPER 2 - Genetic history of the Southern Arc-A bridge between West Asia and Europe 3,000...pdf
    3.6 MB · Views: 5
Does it say anything about the Roman Republican period?

Below is the text/figures from the study which deal specifically with the issue of Imperial Rome.


The Anatolian origins of the population of the Roman-Byzantine Empire
A paleogenomic time transect of the city of Rome in Central Italy (28) identified an ancestry shift toward the Near East during the Imperial period (27 BCE to 300 CE) but was unable to localize the origin of the migrants driving this phenomenon. We sought to identify the geographic sources of these Imperial-era Romans by coanalyzing the data from Italy with data from the Southern Arc.

Unexpectedly, the ancestry of the sample of people whose genomes were analyzed who lived around Rome in the Imperial period was almost identical to that of Roman and Byzantine individuals from Anatolia in both their mean (Fig. 3A) and pattern of variation (Fig. 3B), whereas Italians before the Imperial period had a very different distribution (28, 29). We clustered diverse Roman, Byzantine, and medieval individuals and their immediate predecessors without any knowledge of their population labels and found that the Italian and Anatolian individuals clustered together with those of pre-Roman Anatolia, whereas pre-Imperial people around the city of Rome were systematically different (Fig. 3C). This suggests that the Roman Empire in both its shorter-lived western part and the longer-lasting eastern centered on Anatolia had a diverse but similar population plausibly drawn, to a substantial extent, from Anatolian pre-Imperial sources.

In an irony of history, although the Roman Republic prevailed in its existential military struggle against the Anatolians rallied by Mithridates VI of Pontus during the first century BCE, the final incorporation of Anatolia into the Roman Empire and the increased connectivity that ensued may have set the stage for the very same Anatolians to become the demographic engine of Imperial Rome itself. This recreated, in historical time, the mythical journey of Aeneas and his Trojan exiles from Anatolia to the shores of Italy.

The Southern Arc was also a recipient of many immigrants from outside the region in the Historical period, such as two individuals sampled in Samsun in the Black Sea region from the Roman era in the second to third centuries CE (17). These individuals have both Eastern European hunter-gatherer and some East Eurasian ancestry that contrasts them with the local population of the Black Sea region that had been stable since the Chalcolithic (30), across the Early Bronze Age transition at Amasya, and down to the time of the Kingdom of Pontus (first century BCE).

Broad genetic stability in Anatolia during the Roman-Byzantine period did not mean isolation, as outliers of likely Levantine, Northern European or Germanic, and Iberian origin are detected in the Marmara region (in the Basilica of Nicaea or present-day Iznik and the Virgin Mary Monastery at Zeytinliada, Erdek) close to the Imperial capital of Constantinople (present-day Istanbul), which may have attracted a more diverse set of foreigners.

Other outliers are found at the periphery of the Southern Arc in the Iron Age, in Moldova and Romania, long after the early steppe migrants previously discussed. These are distinctive because of the East Eurasian admixture of Central Asian Scythian individuals (31–33).

28. M. L. Antonio et al., Science 366, 708–714 (2019).
29. T. Saupe et al., Curr. Biol. 31, 2576–2591.e12 (2021).
30. E. Skourtanioti et al., Cell 181, 1158–1175.e28 (2020).
31. M. Unterländer et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 14615 (2017).
32. P. B. Damgaard et al., Nature 557, 369–374 (2018).
33. M. Krzewińska et al., Sci. Adv. 4, eaat4457 (2018).


Fig 3.jpg


So no Laura, other than the blank statement that the 'Italians before the Imperial period had a very different distribution. The sources they use as per notes 28-29 offer more guidance on this though do not specifically go up to the birth of Rome/Republican period.


28. M. L. Antonio et al., Science 366, 708–714 (2019).

Ancient Rome: A genetic crossroads of Europe and the Mediterranean


Abstract

Ancient Rome was the capital of an empire of ~70 million inhabitants, but little is known about the genetics of ancient Romans. Here we present 127 genomes from 29 archaeological sites in and around Rome, spanning the past 12,000 years. We observe two major prehistoric ancestry transitions: one with the introduction of farming and another prior to the Iron Age. By the founding of Rome, the genetic composition of the region approximated that of modern Mediterranean populations. During the Imperial period, Rome's population received net immigration from the Near East, followed by an increase in genetic contributions from Europe. These ancestry shifts mirrored the geopolitical affiliations of Rome and were accompanied by marked interindividual diversity, reflecting gene flow from across the Mediterranean, Europe, and North Africa.

Summary

Our work outlines the genetic history of Rome and central Italy during the last 12,000 years. After two major prehistoric population turnovers—one with the introduction of farming and another prior to the Iron Age—individuals in central Italy began to genetically approximate modern Mediterranean populations. Throughout the past 3000 years, there were still pronounced ancestry shifts across time periods driven by genetic contributions from the Near East in the Imperial period, and later from Europe, mirroring changes in the political affiliations of Rome. Furthermore, within each time period, individuals exhibited highly diverse ancestries, including those from the Near East, Europe, and North Africa. These high levels of ancestry diversity began prior to the founding of Rome and continued through the rise and fall of the empire, demonstrating Rome’s position as a genetic crossroads of peoples from Europe and the Mediterranean.


29. T. Saupe et al., Curr. Biol. 31, 2576–2591.e12 (2021).


Ancient genomes reveal structural shifts after the arrival of Steppe-related ancestry in the Italian Peninsula


SUMMARY

Across Europe, the genetics of the Chalcolithic/Bronze Age transition is increasingly characterized in terms of an influx of Steppe-related ancestry. The effect of this major shift on the genetic structure of populations in the Italian Peninsula remains underexplored. Here, genome-wide shotgun data for 22 individuals from commingled cave and single burials in Northeastern and Central Italy dated between 3200 and 1500 BCE provide the first genomic characterization of Bronze Age individuals (n = 8; 0.001–1.23 coverage) from the central Italian Peninsula, filling a gap in the literature between 1,950 and 1,500 BCE. Our study confirms a diversity of ancestry components during the Chalcolithic and the arrival of Steppe-related ancestry in the central Italian Peninsula as early as 1,600 BCE, with this ancestry component increasing through time. We detect close patrilineal kinship in the burial patterns of Chalcolithic commingled cave burials and a shift away from this in the Bronze Age (2,200–900 BCE) along with lowered runs of homozygosity, which may reflect larger changes in population structure. Finally, we find no evidence that the arrival of Steppe-related ancestry in Central Italy directly led to changes in frequency of 115 phenotypes present in the dataset, rather that the post-Roman Imperial period had a stronger influence, particularly on the frequency of variants associated with protection against Hansen’s disease (leprosy). Our study provides a closer look at local dynamics of demography and phenotypic shifts as they occurred as part of a broader phenomenon of widespread admixture during the Chalcolithic/Bronze Age transition.

I've attached both these studies as PDFs.

FINAL NOTE:

Assuming the finding is correct and that it was driven in some way by military loses to the male gene pool sustained through a non-sustainable battlefield culling of original Romans (?), the reason why this particular area served as a the specific geographic replenishment pool in such a comparative short period of time would be of great interest as the suggestion of a relatively sudden and homogenic change in ancestry of Romans living 27BC-300AD to an Anatolian style origin might have some implications regarding the emergence of Mithraic influences..? Or even Christianity...?
 

Attachments

  • 1. Ancient Rome - A genetic crossroads of Europe.pdf
    1.6 MB · Views: 2
  • 2. Ancient genomes reveal structural shifts.pdf
    7.4 MB · Views: 2
Back
Top Bottom