Because what is happening right now, it seems that most likely in near future, might be a lots of people would starving to death due to food shortage.
So I was thinking about this subject several days and come up with this idea about connecting to the information field for accessing all the necessary nutrients energy to the ones own drinking water.
Anyway until we can complete transition to next density, we have to get energy from the foods, but in case no foods available for us then I do think that access nutrients energy from information field is other option.
What do you guys think? It’s possible theory or not.
February 6th 2016
(L) Oh yeah! This is very interesting. I forgot to tell ya'll about this. Ark has read a very interesting study about water and how you can talk to it and program it.
(Arky) So question is first, is it really the case that water is so smart that when you talk to it, you can change its properties?
A: Yes
Q: (Arky) Okay. Now, what is it in the water that makes it so sensitive to intentions that they make the water change its chemical and biological functions?
A: This goes beyond the material properties to the information field that is the fundament of water, a most basic substance in the cosmos with strong creative and receptive qualities.
Q: (Galatea) Water has memory. It's like a library. It has memory.
(L) That's the problem we're trying to get to.
(Galatea) Oh, you're trying to understand why?
(L) Exactly.
(Arky) Is water really VERY, VERY, VERY special in this respect?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) So other substances don't have those properties?
A: Right.
Q: (Galatea) That's where the idea holy water comes from.
(Joe) So, should we talk to our water?
(Arky) Yes
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) What should we say?
(L) Good water! Good water!
(Andromeda) Nice water! [laughter]
(Galatea) Is it good to let rainwater touch your skin whenever it rains?
A: Not much recently, you might get burned.
Q: (L) Acid rain. You've got more questions about the water, honey?
(Arky) Not about the water. I want to ask about dialectical logic. There was this guy Hegel. He invented what is called dialectics. It can be summarized like contradictions are important; there is thesis, anti-thesis, and then you have synthesis. Okay... There is idealistic dialectics, materialistic, etc. And of course there are critics saying it's nonsense, that the only good logic is Aristotelian logic, and all this dialectics is just pure nonsense. I would like to have some hint. Should I study dialectic logic and Hegel?
A: Law of Three rules!
Q: (Arky) Law of three?
(Pierre) Thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
(Arky) Okay, I am done.
(Joe) On the water thing, is it best to do this with distilled water?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) I have a question that'll sound crazy. Is water similar to space?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) I knew it! [laughter]
(Pierre) Similar in what sense?
(L) It's like etheric.
(Galatea) Space is water?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) I knew it!
(L) So did the ancients. They called it The Waters Above.
(Galatea) Really?
(Joe) Can we make heavy water by talking to it?
(Arky) No, no, no. With water, this is very strange. I was reading about the experiments. So, first you talk to water, you test the water, and it makes it different. But then you have to be clever. If it is just information, you don't have to talk to water. You use the computer to convert your talk into a number. You print the number on the piece of paper, you put it on the bottle, and water should be smart enough because anyhow it's information! It's not your talk. It's somewhere, right? You put it on the label, and water knows what was your intention. Experiments were even done like that.
(Galatea) Water is the Google search of the universe.
A: Yes
Q: (Arky) You convert your talk to a number, like 1000, 2010, okay there's a number. Your language and intent is this number. But you can say something with good intentions, or with wrong intention. The algorithm is such that it may produce the same number for either. Yet, it seems that the water is smart enough that even if you put the same number on two bottles, but derived from different language and intent, it knows whether the intention was positive or negative!
(L) Even if the number is the same?!
(Arky) You see? So the information is somewhere. It's not really important what words you use or what you say exactly. You communicate in some way with the information field that is everywhere.
(Pierre) And the water has this special connection to the information field, and it knows what the number is related to.
(Arky) So your piece of paper is really the address of a piece of information.
A: Yes
(Andromeda) That's fascinating
February 10th 2018
A: Codes express as waves of energy.
Q: (Artemis) Think of it like the Matrix when he sees the code of the Matrix and affects it. Something like that.
(L) So they say express... Codes are information. They are stored as information. They express as energy. So, if that's the case, then would gravity be like the ultimate code or the ultimate information, and electromagnetism an expression of information?
A: Yes
(Pierre) So, if codes are involved in PK, and codes express as waves of energy, does it mean that in this world that PK is based on some energetic phenomena?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Well, that's very blurry to me. When someone does some PK stuff, what happens to the energy? What is particular to a non-PK event? Is the energy compressed, distorted, twisted...
(L) What are you talking about? PK vs non-PK event?
(Pierre) At a distance I move this crystal. There is PK between the experiencer and the item. Energetically, what is going on? That's my question.
A: Information is being sent.
Q: (Pierre) Information is being sent by the individual to the item - in an energetic form?
A: Yes like a phone call.
Q: (Pierre) It's electromagnetic, and then...
(L) It gets decoded. So, next question?
(Artemis) Pierre is still curious... [laughter] So, this information that's being sent, it's like light being sent essentially, yes?
A: Close
So I was thinking about this subject several days and come up with this idea about connecting to the information field for accessing all the necessary nutrients energy to the ones own drinking water.
Anyway until we can complete transition to next density, we have to get energy from the foods, but in case no foods available for us then I do think that access nutrients energy from information field is other option.
What do you guys think? It’s possible theory or not.
February 6th 2016
(L) Oh yeah! This is very interesting. I forgot to tell ya'll about this. Ark has read a very interesting study about water and how you can talk to it and program it.
(Arky) So question is first, is it really the case that water is so smart that when you talk to it, you can change its properties?
A: Yes
Q: (Arky) Okay. Now, what is it in the water that makes it so sensitive to intentions that they make the water change its chemical and biological functions?
A: This goes beyond the material properties to the information field that is the fundament of water, a most basic substance in the cosmos with strong creative and receptive qualities.
Q: (Galatea) Water has memory. It's like a library. It has memory.
(L) That's the problem we're trying to get to.
(Galatea) Oh, you're trying to understand why?
(L) Exactly.
(Arky) Is water really VERY, VERY, VERY special in this respect?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) So other substances don't have those properties?
A: Right.
Q: (Galatea) That's where the idea holy water comes from.
(Joe) So, should we talk to our water?
(Arky) Yes
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) What should we say?
(L) Good water! Good water!
(Andromeda) Nice water! [laughter]
(Galatea) Is it good to let rainwater touch your skin whenever it rains?
A: Not much recently, you might get burned.
Q: (L) Acid rain. You've got more questions about the water, honey?
(Arky) Not about the water. I want to ask about dialectical logic. There was this guy Hegel. He invented what is called dialectics. It can be summarized like contradictions are important; there is thesis, anti-thesis, and then you have synthesis. Okay... There is idealistic dialectics, materialistic, etc. And of course there are critics saying it's nonsense, that the only good logic is Aristotelian logic, and all this dialectics is just pure nonsense. I would like to have some hint. Should I study dialectic logic and Hegel?
A: Law of Three rules!
Q: (Arky) Law of three?
(Pierre) Thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
(Arky) Okay, I am done.
(Joe) On the water thing, is it best to do this with distilled water?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) I have a question that'll sound crazy. Is water similar to space?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) I knew it! [laughter]
(Pierre) Similar in what sense?
(L) It's like etheric.
(Galatea) Space is water?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) I knew it!
(L) So did the ancients. They called it The Waters Above.
(Galatea) Really?
(Joe) Can we make heavy water by talking to it?
(Arky) No, no, no. With water, this is very strange. I was reading about the experiments. So, first you talk to water, you test the water, and it makes it different. But then you have to be clever. If it is just information, you don't have to talk to water. You use the computer to convert your talk into a number. You print the number on the piece of paper, you put it on the bottle, and water should be smart enough because anyhow it's information! It's not your talk. It's somewhere, right? You put it on the label, and water knows what was your intention. Experiments were even done like that.
(Galatea) Water is the Google search of the universe.
A: Yes
Q: (Arky) You convert your talk to a number, like 1000, 2010, okay there's a number. Your language and intent is this number. But you can say something with good intentions, or with wrong intention. The algorithm is such that it may produce the same number for either. Yet, it seems that the water is smart enough that even if you put the same number on two bottles, but derived from different language and intent, it knows whether the intention was positive or negative!
(L) Even if the number is the same?!
(Arky) You see? So the information is somewhere. It's not really important what words you use or what you say exactly. You communicate in some way with the information field that is everywhere.
(Pierre) And the water has this special connection to the information field, and it knows what the number is related to.
(Arky) So your piece of paper is really the address of a piece of information.
A: Yes
(Andromeda) That's fascinating
February 10th 2018
A: Codes express as waves of energy.
Q: (Artemis) Think of it like the Matrix when he sees the code of the Matrix and affects it. Something like that.
(L) So they say express... Codes are information. They are stored as information. They express as energy. So, if that's the case, then would gravity be like the ultimate code or the ultimate information, and electromagnetism an expression of information?
A: Yes
(Pierre) So, if codes are involved in PK, and codes express as waves of energy, does it mean that in this world that PK is based on some energetic phenomena?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Well, that's very blurry to me. When someone does some PK stuff, what happens to the energy? What is particular to a non-PK event? Is the energy compressed, distorted, twisted...
(L) What are you talking about? PK vs non-PK event?
(Pierre) At a distance I move this crystal. There is PK between the experiencer and the item. Energetically, what is going on? That's my question.
A: Information is being sent.
Q: (Pierre) Information is being sent by the individual to the item - in an energetic form?
A: Yes like a phone call.
Q: (Pierre) It's electromagnetic, and then...
(L) It gets decoded. So, next question?
(Artemis) Pierre is still curious... [laughter] So, this information that's being sent, it's like light being sent essentially, yes?
A: Close