Getting dumber? & the 9 types of intelligence

Chad

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I listened to this interview yesterday with Brett of 'School sucks podcast' and Red Ice Radio. It's a 15 minute snippet of a 1 hour interview (haven't listened) and i found it very interesting. Particularly the comments on how in some ways we are much smarter since every year we are bombarded with more information which we just assimilate because we have to. But as Brett says, this is applicable in certain areas, perhaps technological for example, whereas with politics and emotional intelligence suffer from lack of input/erroneous input.

Brett was/is a teacher and this is the focal point of his podcasts.

Posted is the video and below is one of the first pages i found detailing the 'types' of intelligence. (it turns out this page is by the guy who wrote a book about it. I am familiar with the idea that different people have different learning modalities, but i didn't think that there were 9 (and maybe there arent'). Having them categorised does help with pondering and relating them back to yourself, osit.

I guess it could be considered along the lines of the enneagram or other systems which speculate that we are essentially gifted with certain aspects and these can be identified and utilised. Anyway, it was an interesting 15 minutes :)



_http://skyview.vansd.org/lschmidt/Projects/The%20Nine%20Types%20of%20Intelligence.htm
The Nine Types of Intelligence

By Howard Gardner

1. Naturalist Intelligence (“Nature Smart”)

Designates the human ability to discriminate among living things (plants, animals) as well as sensitivity to other features of the natural world (clouds, rock configurations). This ability was clearly of value in our evolutionary past as hunters, gatherers, and farmers; it continues to be central in such roles as botanist or chef. It is also speculated that much of our consumer society exploits the naturalist intelligences, which can be mobilized in the discrimination among cars, sneakers, kinds of makeup, and the like.

2. Musical Intelligence (“Musical Smart”)

Musical intelligence is the capacity to discern pitch, rhythm, timbre, and tone. This intelligence enables us to recognize, create, reproduce, and reflect on music, as demonstrated by composers, conductors, musicians, vocalist, and sensitive listeners. Interestingly, there is often an affective connection between music and the emotions; and mathematical and musical intelligences may share common thinking processes. Young adults with this kind of intelligence are usually singing or drumming to themselves. They are usually quite aware of sounds others may miss.

3. Logical-Mathematical Intelligence (Number/Reasoning Smart)

Logical-mathematical intelligence is the ability to calculate, quantify, consider propositions and hypotheses, and carry out complete mathematical operations. It enables us to perceive relationships and connections and to use abstract, symbolic thought; sequential reasoning skills; and inductive and deductive thinking patterns. Logical intelligence is usually well developed in mathematicians, scientists, and detectives. Young adults with lots of logical intelligence are interested in patterns, categories, and relationships. They are drawn to arithmetic problems, strategy games and experiments.

4. Existential Intelligence

Sensitivity and capacity to tackle deep questions about human existence, such as the meaning of life, why do we die, and how did we get here.

5. Interpersonal Intelligence (People Smart”)

Interpersonal intelligence is the ability to understand and interact effectively with others. It involves effective verbal and nonverbal communication, the ability to note distinctions among others, sensitivity to the moods and temperaments of others, and the ability to entertain multiple perspectives. Teachers, social workers, actors, and politicians all exhibit interpersonal intelligence. Young adults with this kind of intelligence are leaders among their peers, are good at communicating, and seem to understand others’ feelings and motives.

6. Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence (“Body Smart”)

Bodily kinesthetic intelligence is the capacity to manipulate objects and use a variety of physical skills. This intelligence also involves a sense of timing and the perfection of skills through mind–body union. Athletes, dancers, surgeons, and craftspeople exhibit well-developed bodily kinesthetic intelligence.

7. Linguistic Intelligence (Word Smart)

Linguistic intelligence is the ability to think in words and to use language to express and appreciate complex meanings. Linguistic intelligence allows us to understand the order and meaning of words and to apply meta-linguistic skills to reflect on our use of language. Linguistic intelligence is the most widely shared human competence and is evident in poets, novelists, journalists, and effective public speakers. Young adults with this kind of intelligence enjoy writing, reading, telling stories or doing crossword puzzles.

8. Intra-personal Intelligence (Self Smart”)

Intra-personal intelligence is the capacity to understand oneself and one’s thoughts and feelings, and to use such knowledge in planning and directioning one’s life. Intra-personal intelligence involves not only an appreciation of the self, but also of the human condition. It is evident in psychologist, spiritual leaders, and philosophers. These young adults may be shy. They are very aware of their own feelings and are self-motivated.

9. Spatial Intelligence (“Picture Smart”)

Spatial intelligence is the ability to think in three dimensions. Core capacities include mental imagery, spatial reasoning, image manipulation, graphic and artistic skills, and an active imagination. Sailors, pilots, sculptors, painters, and architects all exhibit spatial intelligence. Young adults with this kind of intelligence may be fascinated with mazes or jigsaw puzzles, or spend free time drawing or daydreaming.
Extra: wiki
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences
Theory of multiple intelligences
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The theory of multiple intelligences is a theory of intelligence that differentiates it into specific (primarily sensory) "modalities", rather than seeing intelligence as dominated by a single general ability. This model was proposed by Howard Gardner in his 1983 book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Gardner articulated seven criteria for a behavior to be considered an intelligence.[1] These were that the intelligences showed: potential for brain isolation by brain damage, place in evolutionary history, presence of core operations, susceptibility to encoding (symbolic expression), a distinct developmental progression, the existence of savants, prodigies and other exceptional people, and support from experimental psychology and psychometric findings.

Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these criteria:[2] musical–rhythmic, visual–spatial, verbal–linguistic, logical–mathematical, bodily–kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral intelligence may also be worthy of inclusion.[3] Although the distinction between intelligences has been set out in great detail, Gardner opposes the idea of labeling learners to a specific intelligence. Each individual possesses a unique blend of all the intelligences. Gardner firmly maintains that his theory of multiple intelligences should "empower learners", not restrict them to one modality of learning.[4]
 
Interesting topic, and I'm surprised that there are no replies. So here's one:
In my humble opinion, having intelligence is no good unless you can apply it to your own life.
I have met engineers for instance, who couldn't solder a wire if you paid them. (They were paid more than me!)
I have met doctors who could not make a proper diagnosis, even though I told them what the problem was!
(a busted achilles tendon, in this case)
Anyway, I think we all lean towards a certain type of intelligence, skewing the enneagram if you will.
Perhaps if we are to achieve a kind of balance in our lives, we need to develop intelligence in our weaker areas.
I think I'm lacking in numbers 4 and 6.
Other people may have a different opinion, about my intelligence.
As for IQ, the best we can hope for is 100, which is the average.
 
MusicMan said:
Interesting topic, and I'm surprised that there are no replies. So here's one:
Maybe that's because the person interviewed shows a severe lack of knowledge concerning psychopathy and that affects his studies of the subject in question.
Otherwise I found the interview somewhat interesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom