Azur
The Living Force
any comments on "Handbook for the New Paradigm"?
If one bothers to read the actual treatise, it is easy to see that MT is targetting those that think that one can materialize "stuff" out of thin air, very much like the Robert Monroe episode where an "human" at one point, in "a" timeline, grabs a handful of dirt and manifest an ear of corn.
What he is saying, as far as I see, is that it isn't that easy, because of the lack of understanding of entanglement of the desire. I'll repeat this: it isn't that easy, i.e. you don't get the "automatic results as promised" BECAUSE of the lack of understanding of the entanglement of your specific desire. It isn't FREE. No free lunch. If you cannot see clearly how this will serve you, with in depth honesty, you aren't likely to get too far. Think you were honest, looked deep enough within, and still nothing happened? Look again. Is it a whim? Mt seems to say that it must not only fit your "profille" for growth, but your desire has "competition" in a closed energy system.
What is "entanglement"? Mt explains it a little, and that's where you see where you may not get an automatic response, and on the flip side, where you can actually get clear and try it out for yourself. (He does address the negative area where disaster befalls people. Did they "attract" this to themsleves? You'll read about the "Law of Allowance" and the "Law of Attraction". Both of these might be simplistic explanations of the "how", with some of the current science saying it may be possible. I still have a problem understanding people "attracting" hardship, but then again, if all there is, is lessons, then maybe it is for the good of those involved. Do they deserve it? Not from my point of view. But I'm watching and learning. I interfere regardless where my empathy kicks in.)
MT goes on in my interpretive view that it is NOT that it isn't POSSIBLE, but that in manifesting, or shall we say activating a Universal mechanism (that he does NOT deny exists), it is PARAMOUNT that one understands the WHAT and the WHY. *This* is the problem, or the obstacle, that would lead to one hearing of the possibility that the Universe works this way, tries it, and comes up short, and why a glib transmission that you can have everything you want is simplistic and can lead to dis-illusionement. This is what I think MT was specifically warning about. It is not about performing a magic trick, but understanding, 1) that it is possible, and 2) what you want in your interaction with reality as you UNDERSTAND it.
For what it's worth, I *have* seemingly manifested, clearly, and have received. Maybe it is simply a coincidence.
Cheers.
Moonwalker has expressed this best when he said it has become a derogatory comment on this forum. The issue has NOT been analized in depth here, with a reference to the MT article as proof, lightly boiled, enough to be taken as a "gold" stamp that the concept is New Age BS by those who are looking for neat and easy answers.moonwalker said:
If one bothers to read the actual treatise, it is easy to see that MT is targetting those that think that one can materialize "stuff" out of thin air, very much like the Robert Monroe episode where an "human" at one point, in "a" timeline, grabs a handful of dirt and manifest an ear of corn.
What he is saying, as far as I see, is that it isn't that easy, because of the lack of understanding of entanglement of the desire. I'll repeat this: it isn't that easy, i.e. you don't get the "automatic results as promised" BECAUSE of the lack of understanding of the entanglement of your specific desire. It isn't FREE. No free lunch. If you cannot see clearly how this will serve you, with in depth honesty, you aren't likely to get too far. Think you were honest, looked deep enough within, and still nothing happened? Look again. Is it a whim? Mt seems to say that it must not only fit your "profille" for growth, but your desire has "competition" in a closed energy system.
What is "entanglement"? Mt explains it a little, and that's where you see where you may not get an automatic response, and on the flip side, where you can actually get clear and try it out for yourself. (He does address the negative area where disaster befalls people. Did they "attract" this to themsleves? You'll read about the "Law of Allowance" and the "Law of Attraction". Both of these might be simplistic explanations of the "how", with some of the current science saying it may be possible. I still have a problem understanding people "attracting" hardship, but then again, if all there is, is lessons, then maybe it is for the good of those involved. Do they deserve it? Not from my point of view. But I'm watching and learning. I interfere regardless where my empathy kicks in.)
MT goes on in my interpretive view that it is NOT that it isn't POSSIBLE, but that in manifesting, or shall we say activating a Universal mechanism (that he does NOT deny exists), it is PARAMOUNT that one understands the WHAT and the WHY. *This* is the problem, or the obstacle, that would lead to one hearing of the possibility that the Universe works this way, tries it, and comes up short, and why a glib transmission that you can have everything you want is simplistic and can lead to dis-illusionement. This is what I think MT was specifically warning about. It is not about performing a magic trick, but understanding, 1) that it is possible, and 2) what you want in your interaction with reality as you UNDERSTAND it.
For what it's worth, I *have* seemingly manifested, clearly, and have received. Maybe it is simply a coincidence.
Cheers.
What I intended to communicate was that I seemingly attracted what I was looking for after having a "clear" idea of what it was (to a relatively high degree of detail) and why I wanted it. I said that maybe it is a coincidence, because these things undoubtedly existed before I thought them up, and my finding them or "receiving" them might only really be that I could find a path to them. 
