[...] It is not normal to want to inflict pain on other people and shows a clear lack of a functioning conscience if not downright pathological deviancy. Likewise, it is not normal to want to receive pain and torture. For the latter people, a skilled therapist who has a handle on Healing developmental trauma and the like, would be more appropriate, but in todays climate I am afraid that a doctor would not be able to even suggest such without being attacked by the PC culture.
Truly a sign of degeneration and a lack of higher values, for which Darwinism and the whole evolutionary materialistic shtick carries a lot of responsibility. OSIT
I've been finding it interesting/challenging to try to measure how much of that PC attack culture push-back reaction you describe comes in the form of Twitter/social-media madness, and how much is actually out there in the real world.
I find it much easier to voice conservative opinions in person, especially one-on-one, and have productive conversations than it is to communicate similar ideas on social media.
Case in point:
I was in a public space, and was talking with somebody. Our conversation wasn't loud, but it was clear that people around were able to listen in without trying. The subject of President Trump came up, and the fellow I was talking with casually indicated that Trump was an evil man. I disagreed in a friendly manner, and qualified my comment; "He's kind of a boreish person without much social grace, but I don't think he's evil or even particularly bad as presidents go."
Wow!
Everybody in the immediate vicinity physically jolted and displayed an array of fight/flight panic reactions, like I'd set off some kind of stun device. It was quite surprising. It's like there had been an invisible tension balloon in the room which I'd not noticed until I popped it with a word pin.
One of the peanut gallery folks afterwards brought up the concepts of cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias, clearly intended for my consumption and supposed benefit. Without directly addressing the subject which had started this cascade of reactions, I agreed that those were important subjects to be aware of, and added that doing personal research into popular ideas in order to determine their truth and validity was equally important. I left, feeling adrenalized, shaken and wondering if I'd made enemies.
Several days later, in the same space and crowd, I noticed that attitudes of those people had changed somewhat and that any negative reactions which might have been present were now either submerged or diminished; the tension balloon was no longer present, the unspoken blockage had been somehow digested in a manner which didn't require my personal destruction. There wasn't even any ambivalence that I was able to notice, and perhaps there was even a shift in attitudes regarding the primary subject matter, (Trump and conservative views).
What did
not happen was a Twitter mob forming and cancel culture descending on my life. Had such a discussion taken place on-line in any number of forum spaces, the result would likely have been quite different.
This might have to do with the quality of people involved. There were no blue-haired, face-pierced committed idealogues present. Just regular normal people with liberal attitudes.
Sex Infanticide - Couple have sex and the woman gets pregnant allowing the baby to grow up to 20-24 weeks. Then the woman aborts the baby. Now that’s almost a full grown baby. The couple have sex again, baby grows to 20-24 weeks followed by abortion. The mentioned couple have now done it 7 times over 10 years just to keep experiencing pregnancy whilst enjoying unprotected sex. Apparently it makes them feel more wholesome and close to each other.
[...]
This is beyond sickening. Watch the video, there is lot more in there.
I saw the same video, and found it equally upsetting, and my reaction at the time was to upvote several of the angrier comments.
Alex Jones is plugged into the same information stream as PJW, and vice/versa. I'm signed up for both of their news letters via email. AJ framed the same story as something along the lines of, "When civilizations fall, child and baby sacrafices are a common feature!" (But louder and with more Southern Preacher fire & brimstone proselytizing energy.)
In any case, I'd never thought of abortions in that way; as child sacrafices to the Beast. That's a damned interesting insight! -And it's why I tune into Alex Jones from time to time; for the system shock and wake-up calls to keep me from slipping into the soul sleep Gurdjieff warned us about.
I think it's important to remain aware, however, that AJ represents a force which may turn out to be quite dangerous, (as Paul Joseph Watson may as well by extension, though he seems far more self aware). AJ's mode of communication can push people into emotionally heightened states through his shock-jock approach, rather than encouraging rational thinking and digestion of ideas. Those emotional states are required for mobs to rise and and civil wars to start. (Civil wars are a far, far different thing than international wars). If shots are going to be fired at fellow citizens, (from the Right, anyway), it will be by people revolted into action by the idea of "Breeder Fetishists" and similar horrors rather than from people objectively angered about civil rights violations and corrupt government officials.