03's mindset reminded me of FB fact checkers. The same pedantic black/white thinking, poking what they perceive as holes but fully misunderstanding the content they're criticizing and therefore poking no real holes. It's actually kinda sad, you know this person is largely dysfunctional if this is the kind of thinking that drives them in their life, and thanks to dunning krueger they have no idea that they're a mess.
As for the C's "accuracy" - a lot of what they say isn't something that can be verified - how does one verify STO/STS for example? It seems simple but how do you prove it to yourself or to someone else? The only way (thus far) is to learn to observe yourself and others as objectively as possible, network about your observations, be sincere with yourself and your network, and in time you will start to develop an understanding of the nuances and complexities of STS/STO, and how they work, how they effect people who choose one or the other, and it will be a work in progress possibly forever as your understanding is refined. In other words, there are many things that require years of experience, networking, writing, reading, and thinking, and even then they're not even close to being complete! You can try to prove or verify or convey the best you can to those who haven't done the work, but it will just be words to them.
For example - the C's could say something like "black holes are physical reflection of final destination of STS" and until you have understood STS, entropy, nihilism, subjectivity/objectivity, wishful thinking, love, knowledge, yin-yang, and many other things, this and many other statements will be rather meaningless to you. And perhaps eventually you can say "aha I get it now, it makes perfect sense!" and 03 comes along and says "ok explain it to me in 30 words or less" (essentially), and if you can't, well put it into a "miss" bucket! How absurd is that?
This is why I think life experience and age can lead to wisdom that cannot always be fully conveyed or taught, or at least the understanding of that wisdom cannot be taught and must be earned through your own efforts and LOTS of "time". It's like a kid asking what a relationship is, or what love is, and you simply cannot take your 50 year relationship, all the trials and tribulations and lessons, the ups and downs, the fights and the mutual growth, the worries and struggles, warts and all, and convey it meaningfully to someone who has no reference experience to understand, no matter how cocky or self-assured they are (as any teenager is) that they get it, probably even more than you do. Even if you wrote a book for the kid it would just be a lot of words. You cannot take your mind's neural map and transfer it into his head. You cannot explain the impact of a memory that only you can feel and see or even understand.
Even movies, which is an artform which can convey a lot, are only useful to those who can relate to the characters. If I don't have the lived experience, or the soul experience, or the maturity to grasp what I'm seeing, I can't appreciate a love story, or V for Vandetta (arguably also a love story lol), or the Matrix, or anything else. In fact when I first saw the Matrix I didn't get it - I couldn't even explain it to my friends. The concept was SO foreign to my 13 year old eyes that I just had no idea what I just saw. Years later it all started to make sense. But nothing anyone said could possibly truly convey the meanings embedded in that work.
Anyway, all this just to say - a miss list would ironically "miss" all of the above, and that's a HUGE chunk of what the C's are - things that only makes sense through years of experience and effort on our part. Even a hit list is mostly just for fun, because while it's neat to get those nice simple clean "hits", it pales in comparison with the wisdom/philosophy on life and the universe that is imparted to us, which slowly reveals its value as we apply it with faith and as an experiment. As they once said, it is only helpful to those who recognize the application, and that already requires being at a certain point in the learning cycle, otherwise you're not ready to benefit from this work, which is where 03 currently resides.